tv The O Reilly Factor FOX News February 13, 2017 8:00pm-9:01pm PST
8:00 pm
tonight. see you back here tomorrow nigh night. ♪ >> bill: "the o'reilly factor" is on tonight. >> how inhumane this is, to be breaking down peoples doors and separating parents from their children. >> bill: another stunning piece of dishonesty from the american media.. i.c.e. raids targeting criminal aliens misreported. "talking points" will deal with it tonight. >> it is terrifying, it sets you up for all sorts of attacks. puts a target on your forehead. >> bill: the radical left continues to bring up nazis criticizing the trump administration. brit hume has some thoughts on that. >> if we don't do anything about global warming, what do you predict will happen? >> i'm not sure anything will thhappen. i think we will enjoy the snow.a [laughter] >> bill: ahead, watters onon
8:01 pm
some harsh winter weather and global warming. >> what do you think about my hat? >> it looks warm. it is it made of wool? [laughs] >> bill: caution, you are about to enter the "no spin zone." "the factor" begins right now. ♪ >> bill: hi, i am bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. a stunning display of dishonesty from the national press and radical left politicians. that is the subject of this evening's "talking points" memo. last week, about 68080 undocumented aliens were arrested by i.c.e. officials countrywide. many of them have already been deported. the coordinated raids targeted aliens who had committed crimes in the usa, mostly felonies.s. 75% of those taken into custody had convictions, including homicide and rape.
8:02 pm
one man arrested in chicago, an iraqi citizen with a conviction of sexual abuse of a victim unable to consent. many of the arrested nonfelons were associated with the criminals. but those facts have largely gone unreported by the american press. and by the radical left, which is actively misleading you. >> what took place yesterday with raids in personal homes is part of the cog of the trump deportation machine. >> how inhumane this is to be breaking down people's doors,hi separating parents from their children. >> this is donald trump executing his campaign plan. he is trying to be a tough guy, so, he will go after the maids,p the moms, the people that are working in the shops, instead of going after the hard-core criminals. >> bill: maids, moms, shopkeepers, according to that dishonest politician. now, the false news reporting, actually reached the level of hysteria. newspaper headlines screaming things like "the trumpmp
8:03 pm
deportation regime has begun," "immigrant community on high alert," "fearing trump deportation force." in chicago, news of immigration raids intensifies fears. we could find no headlines in major newspapers, none, that bannered the fact that raids were targeted at illegal aliens who had committed serious crimes. committed them. that is not press bias. that is blatant dishonesty. here's another example. in the year 2013, the obama administration removed from this country more than 434,000 illegal aliens, the highest number in history, which goes back to 1892. did you see any anti-obama demonstrations? did you see any screaming headlines in the national media? no, you did not. even after president obama said this.
8:04 pm
>> what we should be doing is setting up a smart, legal immigration system, that doesn't separate families, but does focus on making sure that people who are dangerous, people who are gang bangers, are criminals, we are deporting them as quickly as possible. >> bill: that is exactly what president trump is doing exactly. but the illegal immigration issue has been set up by the media to demonize mr. trump, as a racist and a brutalizer of the poor. that is what is really going on here, a set up. it is flat out disgraceful. if the federal government cannot remove aliens who commit serious crimes in this country, then, we don't have an effective federal government.. yet, the far left and the press, knowing full well that the i.c.e. raids last week were directed at dangerous people,
8:05 pm
chose not to report that. instead, smearing president trump. we have now reached a low point. in american journalism. as for the far left, they are people who do not want any immigration enforcement. they want open borders, they want alien criminals protected, they want anarchy. why? because they don't like america as it stands now. so it is very important for all honest citizens to know you are not getting accurate information and that there is a radical element in this country that wants to destroy it. if this continues, there will be a breaking point. and that is "the memo." now, for the top story reaction, joining us from illinois, nationally syndicated columnist ruben navarrette. so, ruben, i'm very, very concerned about this blatant dishonesty, the reportage of the i.c.e. raids last week.
8:06 pm
are you as concerned as i am? b >> this is a fox news alerts. national security advisor michael flynn has resigned. it follows revelations he might not have been truthful about his conversation with the russian administration. we're going to go live to our white house chief correspondent john roberts standing by with more details. what can you tell us about this unfolding situation that is rocking the trump administration at this hour? >> this is kind of a logical move from what we've seen out of the last 12 hours from the white house paradigm was told as of last night, and looked as though national security advisor flynn would probably, the words
8:07 pm
that were used, "skate through the controversy." they have the prime minister of canada coming. they needed to have the national security advisor in place for talks with canada but then as of this morning when the president saw all the negative press that was coming out about flynn and these conversations that he had had with the russian ambassador that he just thought flynn was becoming far too big a liability. there's a point where you are worth to the administration is outweighed by the distraction that you've become, and i think flynn probably saw the writing on the wall. this afternoon, kellyanne conway said about 3:00 or 3:30 that flynn had took full confidence of the president. that could be seen to be taken one of two ways. if you've got the full confidence of the president, he either believes in you or he's getting ready to pitch you overboard. there's a long and rich history in washington of people who had the full faith and confidence of the president as they were literally being shown the door.
8:08 pm
but really what happened here was that he couldn't survive all of the negative press. and it wasn't so much the fact that he had these conversations, i think, with the russian ambassador. i think the problem for him really was that he told vice president mike pence that he didn't have any conversations with the ambassador about russian sanctions. and then mike pence went on the air and stated emphatically on one of the sunday morning shows that mike flynn had not had any conversations about the topic when indeed it looked like flynn had had conversations about it or might have and couldn't recall. so he really put the vice president in a bad place. i think ultimately that's what took flynn out of his position. >> it goes to the heart, of one
8:09 pm
would arguably say, loyalty and trust. could he be trusted if he had put the vice president and that kind of situation? >> and here's one of the things with flynn. i mean, he was as loyal as they come to president trump. i mean, he was one of the first people to get on board. he was the first person with some stars behind his rank who had come out for that-candidate donald trump. he introduced him at many of the campaign events i was at. this was a loyal guy who really believed in trump and i'm sure this was a very, very difficult decision for the president. to get rid of someone who had been with him for as long as flynn had been. but then at the same time, he apparently was not completely forthcoming with the vice president. apparently put the vice president in a bad position and then was bringing all this negative press upon himself. don't forget, this is not the first time that's happened. the issues with his son is well over the security clearance and
8:10 pm
the pizza parlor thing. i think the president looked at him and said, as much as i might like this guy, as loyal a soldier as he might've been, he's too much of a liability for my public relations standpoint. we are trying to get too much done we can't have this amount of baggage of the white house. >> the trump administration is trying to do a lot, at an accelerated pace. washington is unfamiliar with it and certainly as they do that, they are ruffling some feathers in this particular situation, what do you anticipate the follow-up might be from the resignation of mr. flynn? >> i think first of all, the democrats are probably going to smell blood in the water pray they're going to think they got their first casualty. to some degree, they might be right. a lot of this, flynn brought upon himself. again, a lot of this was pushed by democrats as well pray they were trying to get one of president trump's nominees for the cabinets. they haven't been able to yet.
8:11 pm
andrew puzder looks potentially like the most likely target if they are to prevent the confirmation of one of his nominees. so it may be that they see blood in the water. they smelled blood in the water. they start to go after more of president trump's nominees or people who are in the administration or maybe people say hey, we got one. now let's back off and see where this administration goes great i would think it's probably the former rather than the latter. and we will see. then there's the question of who does he replace him with and, you know, the name david petraeus was floating around enough a lot during the transition. he was spending an awful lot of time with the president-elect and you wonder, is there a position for david petraeus opening up? the only thing is that the conditions of his parole, as my understanding, would not allow
8:12 pm
him to leave the country until april. then there's the possibility that if president trump really wanted petraeus, he could pardon him and petraeus' record is expunged. >> this is a fragile dance that the trump administration is going to have to do to really pick the right person to replace mr. flynn because it is certainly an important position that the president needs in order to move forward with the ambitious plan he has four, as he stated during his campaign, making america great again. do you think they have been in the white house all the short few weeks they've been in office, are they having a difficult time transitioning from campaigning to governing? and could this be part of that followed because without? >> it's always more difficult to govern then it is to plan to govern. the reality of taking control in
8:13 pm
the white house is much different than a theoretical possibility. i think your trying to line up. i don't know if there's ever been a white house that has had a really, really smooth transition. there's always some bumps and some pickups along the way and when you take a look at president trump and the amount of opposition he's got, he's it's not surprising there's a lf bombs. he was trying to get an awful lot done in the first couple weeks. the executive order on extreme vetting and the way that was ruled out. they wanted to get it out of there quickly because they knew there was a lot of opposition to it. the way they rolled it out, it wasn't fully formulated. the language wasn't tight enough. it wasn't written by the department of justice, career attorneys who know government backwards and forwards and they ran into problems with it. the reality of being there at 1600 pennsylvania avenue, just
8:14 pm
to try to get the computers up and running is a real problem let alone actually trying to get something done in terms of executive orders. don't forget this president hasn't even begun to get down the road of legislative changes. >> still getting members of his cabinet in place as well, so there is still many challenges facing him. this one in particular is when the people will be watching and i think as you stated, john, democrats will see this as chum in the water and most likely they will be attacking this and perhaps same to the president "we told you so." moving forward, what do you think the president has to do in order to have some damage control from this? >> he's got to stop the bleeding is what he really has to do. he's got to put some things out there it can't be challenged or if they are challenged, they stand up to scrutiny. the first real test of that is going to be whatever executive
8:15 pm
order he writes or has written by the doj lawyers the next few days to try to put the pieces of his extreme vetting executive order together. if he can get something out that's legally bulletproof, as judge napolitano likes to say, that could be a step in the right direction. but if he keeps putting things out that could be so easily challenged and he can get stymied in court, he's going to continue to stumble. the position of national security advisor, i mean, you talk about the three or four most important positions and an administration. you've got the secretary of state,'s secretary of defense, homeland security, potentially treasury international security advisor because your national security advisor sits just the hall from the resident. they are in every major meeting. they are on every trip. they are probably close to the president than almost anybody else. and so you've got to choose very, very carefully for that
8:16 pm
national security advisor. >> we are talking to white house chief correspondent for fox news, john roberts. we are breaking down the fallout that is stemming from the resignation that fox news is confirming of national security advisor michael flynn. we will continue to follow the developments of this breaking story on the other side of the break. again, we are reporting, and it's been confirmed by our fox news team that michael flynn has actually resigned from his post as national security advisor but what will this mean for the trump administration as it moves forward with an ambitious plan to reshape, as the president has said, and make america great so as they move forward, what kind of impact with this -- would this resignn have?
8:17 pm
8:18 pm
it's a performance machine. engineering... with this degree of intelligence... ...it's a supercomputer. with this grade of protection... ...it's a fortress. and with this standard of luxury... ...it's an oasis. the 2017 e-class. it's everything you need it to be... ...and more. lease the e300 for $549 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing.
8:20 pm
>> this is a fox news alert. we are looking at the white house live. 11:19 on the east coast. i am kelly wright. national security advisor michael flynn has resigned. it follows revelations he might not of been truthful about his conversation with a russian administration. as we continue to follow the developments of these breaking details, we have on line with us our chief white house correspondent john roberts. john, i received a message from you that keith kellogg will be the interim national security advisor paid what can you tell me about keith kellogg? >> let's back up a little bit before we get into kellogg. going to be taking over here in the interim. just to remind folks again how we got here.
8:21 pm
it's all a conversation about the fact that michael flynn probably misled the second most powerful person in the country. it all goes back to the idea that he was having a conversation with the vice president regarding conversations he had with the russian ambassador, sergey kislyak. this was in the days and weeks leading up to the nitration. -- the inauguration. he had had conversations with him. it was said about it was extending christmas greetings to each other, it was about setting up a telephone exchange between the president and the president of russia. and that there was nothing dealing with sanctions which is a big issue because when you are the incoming team, you are not supposed to be talking with officials from another country about official policy.
8:22 pm
and if he had had those conversations, it could be seen as being interference by a citizen on an issue whereas he should've been allowing the current administration to conduct its business the way it saw fit. you can't go in there and say hey, were going to cut deals with you on the side. we are going to pursue our own policy with you as well. i mean, this is the sort of thing you've got to kind of left it alone. if he have these conversations, it could potentially be seen as interference. that's the last thing you want to have when you are the incoming administration. >> kelly: particularly at that level. >> so then he tells the vice president that he didn't
8:23 pm
have any contact with the russians regarding this. the vice president goes on television and he says, as far as i know, in answer to a question, our national security advisor did not have any conversations with russia about anything substantive prior to the inauguration. then the vice president is out there and if you've got your vice president out there saying something that is factually incorrect and you've been told that by the national security advisor, it comes down to a matter of trust. even if you trust a guy for certain reasons, you can't trust that this person is going to give you all the good information all the time. if he is telling an untruth to the vice president, then what else is going on. at any rate, back to kellogg. you remember that he was in charge of the presidential transition agency action team for defense. he has been with trump for a while. he's a guy who was commander of the 82nd airborne division, has
8:24 pm
a tremendous amount of military experience, a tremendous amount of national security experience and he is definitely someone who can take over the reins and is it possible that he gets a job? potentially he could get the jo job. he was announced as the chief of staff of the national security council. he was basically the number three there anyway. so to elevate him as national security advisor is something that's a natural. but it could be that maybe the president wants to bring in someone else. again, i go back to david petraeus who was seen frequently at trump tower and the president was trying to find a place for petraeus in the administration. the problem was that he already had general kelly. he already had general mattis and he had flynn as well-paid was he going to bring in yet another general to take a
8:25 pm
position in the administration? there was one too many generals for petraeus but now that flynn is gone, that potentially opens up a position for another general to come in and take over. i wouldn't be surprised if the name david petraeus gets floated unless he just says you know what, keep kellogg in there. he's the guy trust. he was chief of staff anyways of the national security counsel. why not let's just leave him there? >> kelly: for those of you just tuning in, we are talking to john roberts about the resignation of national security advisor michael flynn, who has resigned this evening. the national security advisor, we should point out, he plays a critical role in the administration in terms of our national security. he advises and assists the president on national security matters as well as foreign policy. this is someone you have to have in your close staff who understands that he has to be
8:26 pm
truthful on every topic. apparently we don't know for certain what was said to the russians between he and michael flynn in the foreign advisor for the russians but we do know that the vice president was not told. in no uncertain terms, perhaps the complete truth. michael flynn going to the vice president and saying i don't have a recollection if i talked to them about sanctions that the administration, the obama administration, had imposed on the russians. looking forward, with just a little bit of time that i have, what do you think this administration is going to have to do tomorrow morning when it addresses the american people? >> i think it has to say we made a change appeared we knew there was a problem. despite the president's advisors saying in the afternoon that the president has full confidence in general flynn prayed you've got to say general flynn chose to take himself out.
8:27 pm
he had become a distraction. we are moving ahead. we're going to go 1 foot in front of the other. we have jettisoned the issues and let's get back to the work that people elected donald trump to do. yep. we've got a mouthbreather. well, just put on a breathe right strip and ... pow! it instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than cold medicine alone. so you can breathe ... and sleep. shut your mouth and say goodnight mouthbreathers. breathe right. and now we unleash it onwerful your taxes.pecies has created. hello my name is watson. yep. h&r block and ibm watson together. creating a future of more money going back into the pockets of more families. welcome to taxes won.
8:30 pm
>> bill: "factor followup" segment tonight. >> bill: "factor followup" segment tonight. as you may know, nordstrom's and a few other retailers have downgraded products from ivanka trump, the president's daughter. now, sears and kmart have stopped selling some trump home furnishing products online.hehe what is behind all of this? joining us from los angeles, leslie marshall and from washington, katie pavlich.
8:31 pm
i didn't even know they were trump home products. >> now you know.ka >> bill: i am an ikea guy. i'm a simple man. i don't need my house to look like a palace of louis the 14th. but this is all so sudden. all of a sudden, ivanka's stuff is going out the window, and trump's lamps are going into the basement. what is this? >> first of all, i had to fact-check you and say that ikea furniture is not simple to put together. everybody's goal in life is to buy furniture that is put together rather than the kind you get from ikea but i do also like ikea. in terms of what is going on with the ivanka trump brand, it is very clear that her brand is suffering from the campaign, which is essentially a liberal mob that doesn't just go after brands they don't like, but goes after their distributors or the retailer stores that dare to sell that brand. >> bill: what is the mob? what is the name? >> grab your wallet campaign. we have seen this before.
8:32 pm
it is not good enough for liberals to disagree, they havee to destroy the livelihoods of those they disagree with. >> bill: grab your wallet is a web site? a social media thing? >> it is a web site that details all of the companies like nordstrom's, sears, that sell ivanka trump or donald trump products. >> bill: for the sole purpose of telling their readers not to buy the stuff, to hurt the retailer that sells them? >> there is also an adverse effect, another consequence, if the stores decide to continue selling these products, there is picketing outside of the store, threats, customers will be intimidated into not buying these products. it is one thing to vote with your wallet, another to deny --e >> bill: we had to figure out who is in charge of this stuff so we can put their pictures on television. do you agree with that assessment, leslie? do you agree that this is a grossly undemocratic intimidation? >> i don't think it is intimidation. i think it is extremely democratic. although it is politicallyhi motivated, obviously, they were
8:33 pm
are those that are saying, wee lost at the ballot box, so, we are going to use our wallets and our purses -- >> bill: let me get this straight. you don't think threats of picketing and disruption in a private business is intimidation? >> i don't think that saying i don't want to buy products -- >> bill: this is not what this is about. according to katie -- leslie, listen to me. that's not what this is about. according to the web site, they are going to disrupt the business if they continue caring -- carrying product they don't like. you say that it's not intimidation? >> i don't think that a hashtag on twitter and a web site thatbn lists all of the companies that carry products with the trump name is intimidating. i think what it is doing is educating people as to where they are spending their money. >> bill: you know, education -- wait, katie. education is supposed to present both sides of the story.
8:34 pm
not a hyper-partisan point of view. that is not education. it is propaganda. is it not? >> listen, bill, in a classroom, i would agree with you. >> bill: you use the word educated -- >> educating somebody or giving information on twitter with a hashtag or a web site, that is not always going to be fair and balanced, you know that. >> bill: go ahead, katie. it sounds like to me. >> it is one thing for an individual to decide i am not going to spend my hard-earned money on ivanka trump or donald trump products. that is one thing. another aspect for the grab your wallet campaign to go after the stores that dare to sell these brands. this is not isolated to ivanka trump or nordstrom or the stores. we have seen us across the board. if you don't want to sell a wedding cake to a certain couple, then, you will be h destroyed financially. if you have a politicalin disagreement, the firefox ceo, if you dare gin up for something
8:35 pm
-- stand up for something you believe in, your entire life will be destroyed prayed you'll be fired. a leftist tactic, taking a different form. >> bill: last question, real fast. you believe that nordstrom's ans sears and the other stores have caved in? you believe they have caved in because of this far left web site? that's what you believe, katie? >> i don't know if it is caving in, i think they are seeing a result of this boycott -- i guess, they would be caving in. they are responding to preventing that type of disruption. >> bill: there are just as many people who like president trump, who could buyti from these stores if they were motivated. ladies, good debate, thank you. when we come back, brit hume on the radical left using nazi analogies to criticize president trump and his supporters. and watters talking climate change in chilly new york city. coming right back. n ally?
8:36 pm
microsoft and its partners are using smart traps to capture mosquitoes and sequence their dna to fight disease. there are over 100 million pieces of dna in every sample. with the microsoft cloud, we can analyze the data faster than ever before. if we can detect new viruses before they spread, we may someday prevent outbreaks before they begin.
8:39 pm
>> announcer: "the o'reilly factor," the number one cable news show for 16 years and counting. >> bill: thanks for staying with us. i am bill o'reilly. the "hume zone" segment tonighto actress meryl streep received an award from the human rights campaign over the weekend here in new york city. as you know, a very liberal person, who despises president trump. after her criticism of the
8:40 pm
president at the golden globe awards a few weeks ago, ms. streep herself received criticism.m. she didn't like it.go >> it is terrifying, a target on your forehead, they set you up for all sorts of attacks. and armies of brownshirts and worse. the only way you can do it is because you have to, you have to. you don't have the option. you have to. >> bill: now, ms. streep makes mention of brownshirts, the arm of the nazi party, earlier and in hitler's rise, led by a man named ernst roehm. essentially thugs, they beat people up and disgrace their country. hitler eventually had the leadership murdered. what ms. streep seems to be implying is that the criticismat of her after the golden globes came from nazi like people or
8:41 pm
something. joining us from florida, brit hume. do you have any idea what merylo streep was trying to say there, brit?? >> i think she was signaling to the audience in the room, which no doubt has no more use for donald trump than she does, that she is one of them. and that she wants them to believe, i guess, that she is courageous for taking on donald trump and that she has been subjected to this nazi-like behavior, i guess, twitter, or wherever else, from people who admire mr. trump. so, i think that it is what it is about. and it is not uncommon these days to hear these veiled or not so veiled references to fascism and nazism in conjunction to -- connection to a donald trump i think it is spectacularly ill-informed and nearly hysterical. there is a lot of it out there. >> bill: we put in a call to miss streep to come on theit program and talk about the history that she refers to. what bothered me about it most
8:42 pm
of all is that she seems to be saying that if you criticize her comments about the president, that you are a nazi. the brownshirts, as you know, anyone who knows history, were vicious animals. they were too gross for hitler, if you can believe it. he killed them, the leadership. they violated every tenet of civility. so, when you are going to make a comparison to killers, that is what the brownshirts were, to people who criticize you for your political comments in america, that is inappropriate, i would think.ol that is inappropriate. >> i suspect what happened here bill, i was pretty critical of donald trump at times during the campaign in the early going, in particular, and his supporters came down on me on twitter pretty hard. they said some pretty ugly things. but that is one thing.
8:43 pm
those are words. i didn't enjoy it. but i didn't take it all that seriously. it never occurred to me to draw an analogy between these pro trump people who were pretty ugly at times and anything t remotely comparable. to what went on in hitler's germany. >> bill: it is way beyond the pale. there is a difference between gross speech, which happens on both sides of the political spectrum, every day, and the violence that ms. streep is referring to. what are bots? do you know what bots are? >> bots are short for robots. you can set up, for example, on twitter, you can set up basically a bot account, the effect of which will allow you remotely or without you being present to repeatedly post a tweet over and over again so people will see it. it is an automated form of tweeting. you can use that. having said all this, bill, i want to add one thing.
8:44 pm
first of all, meryl streep is a spectacularly great actress, no question about that. some of what she is saying is not too far off from some of the things that are being said, even by some of mr. trump'so conservative critics. you hear autocrat, you hear something close to the word fascist being used. so, if you think the way she does, and are inclined to think the way she does, you don't have to look far these days to find people -- >> bill: it's a difference between those comments, they art leveled at the president. she categorized people who criticize her, and i'm sure she did get some gross stuff, as you did, as nazis.g. all right, brit hume, everybody. there he is. watters on deck. the global warming edition. "the factor" is coming right back as we continue all throughout the usa and all over the world. safe drivers who switch to esurance
8:45 pm
could save money on car insurance. in fact, safe drivers who switch from geico to esurance could save hundreds. so if you switch to esurance, saving is a pretty safe bet. auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance. an allstate company. click or call. you fand together, of your dreams... you had the kid of your dreams. now you can put them in the car of your dreams... for a lot less than you might think. with a certified pre-owned mercedes-benz, you can enjoy legendary safety, innovation and performance at a price you can afford. and that's a pretty sweet dream. visit the certified pre-owned sales event, now through february 28th. only at your authorized dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. watry...duo fusiong heartburn relief? duo fusion goes to work in seconds and lasts up to 12 hours. tums only lasts up to 3. for longer lasting relief...in one chewable tablet try duo fusion from the makers of zantac
8:48 pm
>> bill: "back of the book" segment tonight, "watters world," as we get a blizzard here in new york city. what a better time to send watters out to talk to the folks about climate change?et ♪ >> where are you from? >> i am from russia. >> what's up, comrade? >> good, perfect. >> i say, no. >> you know what this is, global warming. [laughter] >> how big of an issue for you is global warming? >> very big.ow it's a national security issue because we are going to have what are called climate refugees, when the sea levels rise, so much of the world's population is living at sea level, they are going to have nowhere to go. >> that is a very interesting line of reasoning.
8:49 pm
>> we better extremely vet those people. >> it's true. with donald as president. >> how big of an issue is global warming? >> not a big issue. i don't really care. >> i don't think it is big at all. just look out behind us, it is freezing, it is snowy, it is cold. >> i can't feel my arms! >> it is a big issue. >> how many degrees has the earth's temperature risen in the last couple of years? >> i'm not a meteorologist. [laughter] >> i can see that. >> what do you think we should do about global warming? >> whatever we can do, we should do. >> did i not tell you just to do it, do it. >> i don't think you can do anything. >> what you think will happen it we do nothing about global warming? >> sea levels will rise, we will be underwater.pe >> so, we could go swimming together?ng >> that sounds nice. [laughter] ♪ >> oh, boy. [laughs] >> you guys, grab your suits, i will meet you down at the pool.
8:50 pm
♪ >> who do you guys think is responsible for global warming?? >> companies, especially like cattle farming in brazil. t they take down a lot of trees just to make grass fields for the cows. those trees are filters for the world. >> don't you like a nice steak, though? >> i will have a steak sandwichl and a steak sandwich. >> who do you think is responsible for global warming? >> humans and cow farts. [laughs] >> people that drive trucks. >> you are blaming truck drivers?s? >> come here. i want to give you a big sloppy kiss. >> all the carbon monoxide, whoever is in charge of that, probably them. >> or it's just the natural course of that the world is taking and we can't do anything about it. >> what do you think you could do to fight climate change? >> we all have to use our vote and get rid of this guy, donald trump. >> oh! >> do you do anything to fight against global warming? >> i don't use a lot of water in my home. i always turn off the sinks and
8:51 pm
showers when they are running where they are not supposed tose be.om i do recycle. >> carpool. >> if this global warming, i would hate to see global cooling. >> jesse, honestly, educate your viewers, really. >> you are better than that. ♪ >> what do you think about my hat? >> i like it. very tropical. >> i got a cockatoo t here. >> i like cockatoos.ik [laughs] >> i think it is ridiculous. >> it's [bleep] amazing. >> i like your hat. can i touch your pom-pom? >> it is fox fur. >> it is fox? >> i am from fox. >> there is a movie called "water world" and they had to fight forr the little water we have left. >> do you think we will all live in "water world?" >> basically. >> i think you are already living in it. >> i am watters and this is my world. >> oh, i like that. >> oh, my god! ♪ >> bill: watters, i know i will get a lot of mail on where people can get a hat like that. i'm sure almost everyone does.
8:52 pm
>> you can buy it at chubbies.com. >> bill: what is chubbies? >> a web site that sells really short shorts and crazy hats. [laughs] >> bill: how would you know about chubbies? >> because i have seen it on the internet. you know what the internet is, right? >> bill: no, i don't know what bots are. were you looking for really short shorts? >> they threw in a free hat with that. >> bill: is that what you were looking for? the short shorts? is that a requisite for your new program on the weekends? [laughter] >> we do things differently on the weekends. >> bill: i would say. you went to a web site, and you got the ugliest hat you could find? >> i thought we were going to talk about global warming. >> bill: this is far more important. u far more important than global warming. that is man-made right there. god had nothing to do with thatl >> the girl from russia goes, what is that, squirrel fur? [laughs] >> bill: she was embarrassed, you know that, right?
8:53 pm
she comes to america to try to see what democracy is and you are standing there with that hat. that is going to drive her right back to moscow.e she is on a plane right now. all right, watters, very good, i guess. "the factor" "tip of the day," another good deed. "the tip," moments away. another good deed. (vo) when it comes to valentine's gifts, helzberg diamonds knows bigger isn't always better. our beautiful diamond heart pendant is just $299.99. that's $200 off! helzberg diamonds. here's to love. tech: don't let a cracked windshtrust safelite.plans. with safelite's exclusive "on my way text"... you'll know exactly when we'll be there. giving you more time for what matters most.
8:54 pm
(team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace. "best cracked pepper sauce" barbeque trophies: "most ribs eaten while calf roping". yep. greatness deserves recognition. you got any trophies, cowboy? uh, yea, well, uh... well, there's this one. "best insurance mobile app"? yep, three years in a row. well i'll be! does that thing just follow you around? like a little puppy. the award-winning geico app. download it today.
8:55 pm
at bp, we empower anyone to stop a job if something doesn't seem right, so everyone comes home safely. because safety is never being satisfied. and always working to be better. >> bill: back to "tip of the day," more good deeds done by our viewers.he a quick note, if you do not have a valentine's day gift yet, crisis time. we will save you, go to billoreilly.com right now, get a premium membership gift. t you give it to the object of your affection, good tidings. now the male.
8:56 pm
i gave the example to explain why the trump administration selected the seven countries for the travel scrutiny. not to explain the court ruling. there was no linkage in the countries on the list. there is no effective vetting. they have functioning governments and passport control. the court of public opinion does require that, john. we reported accurately, richard. the better business bureau
8:57 pm
investigated wounded warriors and now give the charity a good report saying the so-called scandal really didn't amount to much. no spin, just the facts. well, good, bob. that is fair. i appreciate that, simon. the entire interview, unedited posted on billoreilly.com. for the super bowl interview the day of the game, we had to edit it down. now you can see the whole thinge with the president, start to finish, the way it went. many young americans are dopesville. i was a big dope.
8:58 pm
after a while, a significant number of them wise up, as they get older. someday you will lead your generation to sanity. keep it up. well, i am sorry about your dad. lots of great men lost their lives in the pacific -- that isa why i wrote "killing the rising sun." happy birthday, 103 years old in tennessee. i can't do all the birthdays, but way to go cecil. finally, factor "tip of the day." i want to thank everyone from the bottom of my heart -- it has opened up a whole new world the day after my leg was amputated,
8:59 pm
it is quiet in the woods, the lord is truly blessed me with this gift. john is one of the thousands of severely wounded vets whose lives have been changed by donations from independencefund.org. you guys have given almost $30 million over the years bringing relief to the brave men and women who have sacrificed so much. "tip of the day," tip of the hat to all of you who support independencefund.org. please check out the factor web site, different from billoreilly.com. name and town if you wish to apply, do not be umbrageous. when writing to the factor. bowe bergdahl, on tomorrow. we will have our law & order team analyze this.
9:00 pm
i'm bill o'reilly. please, always remember that the spin stops here. because we are definitely looking out for you. ♪ >> tucker: welcome to "tucker speak of this is a fox news alert, a major shakeup in washington within the trump administration. national security advisor michael flynn resigning just a short time ago. it follows reports that he had misled vice president mike pence and other officials about his contacts with russia. his departure upends trump senior team after less than one month in office, and in a resignation letter, flynn said he held numerous calls with the russian ambassador to the u.s. during the transition and it gave incomplete information about those discussions to vice president mike pence. the vice president apparently relying on information from
182 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Fox News West Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News ArchiveUploaded by TV Archive on