new order of things." something to think about tonight. have a good night, everybody. o'reilly is up next. come back and see us tomorrow night for day 27. ♪ >> bill: of "the o'reilly factor" is on tonight. >> general flynn does enjoy the full confidence of the presidents. >> bill: not anymore. the national security chief has resigned. but why? we have the inside story. >> some of his policies -- i don't think those are his ideas. the execution on the ban is horrible. >> bill: billionaire mark cuban emerging as one of president trump's biggest critics. so, what is the beef? mr. cuban will be here. >> if you don't want any trouble, keep your filthy white hands off our beautiful -- >> bill: also, i had come out yale university may honor the black panther movement, which h. we will have a special part on that. caution, you are about to enter

the "no spin zone." sb 16 begins. ♪ >> bill: hi, i am bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. the first casualty of the trump administration, that is a subject of this evening's "talking points" memo. national security chief michael flynn has resigned. the general got into trouble over a phone call he had with the russian ambassador before, before donald trump took office. the issue is centered on sanctions president obama slapped on russia, apparently, general flynn discussed that with the russians. michael flynn should have known that his call was being taped, both by american and russian intelligence agencies, that is standard. but then, things get foggy. i don't know what general flynn said, nobody knows at this point, except government officials because there is a transcript of the conversation, as yet unreleased. according to fox news

correspondent john roberts, general flynn misled vice president depends about the content of the call. that is the big reason he was fired. vice president pence has a lot of power in the white house right now and subordinates simply cannot mislead him. so, the trump administration is now searching for a new national security advisor. the story really ends here. unless general flynn was ordered to say something to the russians that was inappropriate. again, speculating on that, foolish. if evidence surfaces, we will certainly reported. perhaps, the most intriguing aspect on the flynn saga is the p.r. component. yesterday, kellyanne conway said to the general was safe. >> general flynn does enjoy the full confidence of the president and it is a big week for general flynn. he is a point of contact for many of the foreign visits. >> bill: did ms. conway mislead or did she not know the general was in trouble?

either way, not a good situation. "talking points" understands the complexity of running this country. but it's becoming clear that president trump needs better coordination among his staff. there should be someone in charge of call it dominant quality control and accurate messaging, that someone should be chief of staff reince priebus, who is experience and skill. no way kellyanne conway should be out saying all is fine with general flynn when all was not fine. a kind of confusion doesn't do anyone in his country any good, especially because president trump has legions of people trying to hurt him. summing up, flynn is outcome a new security person will be appointed, and the trump white house needs to become better organized. and that is the memo. now, to the top story, how is president trump doing according to the folks? new fox news poll just out spotlights that. do you approve? of trump's executive order on immigration? 46% say yes. 52%, no. should the order, the

immigration order, be described as a terrorist hot spot restriction or a muslim ban? 56%, restriction. 37%, ban. does the order make the usa safer? less safe? no difference? seifert, 42%. less safe, 33, no difference, 24. next, the job approval rating. approve, 48%, disapprove, 47%. finally, are you confident and donald trump's judgment and a crisis? 50% are confident. 49 are not. in october, that number was 43% confident, 56%, no. there has been aching for for the president there. it is clear the country remains divided on president trump. joining us from dallas, one of his critics, mark cuban, billionaire ntb star. let's talk some policy. what is your biggest concern about president trump in that area? >> i think his management style. i think you hit the nail on the

head. i don't think he has been able to show any leadership. i don't think he has taken responsibility for the white house and i don't think he has shown them any direction. i think the results of that are the issues that you have mentioned. there is a divergence in communications. the people at work for him seem to be fearful of having the mistakes pinned on them and that has led to leaks. just inconsistency coming out of the white house. >> bill: that is not really policy. i have to say, that i have never seen, in my lifetime, a new president do as many things as donald trump has done in 26 now, you may not like those things, and that is why we invited you on. that is the policy. >> we can start with policy. let's talk about jobs. all right? he is meeting with all of these companies but he hasn't really gotten to the point where he understands that the nature of work is changing. technology is changing, how

jobs, how people are hired, the jobs are going to do. he is shuffling the deck chairs on the titanic by going and talking to these companies and dealing with five and ten and even 25,000 jobs at a time. look, there is nothing wrong with trying to get more jobs. that is a good thing. but at any given month, our economy gains and loses 5 million plus jobs. we got to start dealing with the macro issues. >> bill: would you see that his goal of keeping manufacturing and plants here in the united states is a good one? would you cede that? >> not really. >> bill: you think it is good for the country to have plants built overseas? do you think that is good? >> that is not what i'm saying at all. >> bill: that is what his goal is, have them both here. >> i get that he wants plants built here. but you are not going to see new buildings, new facilities. what you're going to see our changes to exacting facilities.

>> bill: already, some companies say they will build in factories here because they don't want to play a tariff of bringing their goods back into the usa. >> bill: now, we're into semantics, bill. a new factory, does that mean re-modifying a facility? >> bill: what it be fair, then, to give the president a year to see if the job -- we are talking good jobs, not service, marginal jobs, the median income goes up, that was president obama, he couldn't raise the median -- would it be fair to give president trump a year to see if his aggressive approach results in good jobs appearing in america! would that be fair? >> sure. i have no problem with giving him time. but you have to look at the bigger picture. he hasn't demonstrated that he understands the bigger picture. what i will tell you with 100% certainty, every single one of those companies that he is talking to, whether it is ford, whether it is united technologies, however it may be, their total number of

employees will be fewer in three years and it is today, no matter what he does for you >> bill: we all understand that changing technology and that people have to become educated and edge. >> that is not what i'm saying. no, that is not what i am saying. >> bill: in order to do the new jobs, you need to have a new set of skills required. >> no, that is not correct at all. what i am saying is, with artificial intelligence, neural networks, we are going to see more technological change over the next three years than we have seen over the last -- >> bill: in order for people to harness that change, they are going to have to know the new technology inside and out. >> no, no. i am just telling you, that is not the way it works. people are going to be replaced by these technologies. what we have to do during that disruptive. max, we have to find places for them to go. we have to find new places to put them to work. >> bill: there is always going to be marketing, things like that that they have to do. unless you want to set up a socialistic thing, where everybody is guaranteed a job,

which is never going to happen here. let's get to health care for a minute because i know that is a big issue for you. is it fair to give the trump administration and the republican party six or seven months to come up with a plan? is that fair? >> of course. here is the real question, bill. if you are going to adjust, replace, whatever you want with obamacare, you have got to answer a simple question. out of health care providers, insurance, insurers, and consumers, who is going to take less? that is what we don't know. >> bill: he is trying to drive down the cost by having more competition among the insurance companies and then, browbeating the the farm companies, the drug companies to lower their prices. >> what you're saying is, all these insurance companies are now willing to have lower profits -- >> bill: nobody, because their profits will be going on a wider

canvas in which to sell, so, the volume goes up while the price goes down. >> where will they sell that they didn't sell before? >> they are ordered to sell in certain states. he wants to open it up to the whole country. >> it is not like the companies couldn't start, couldn't initiate -- >> bill: it is a very regimented health care system that we have. mr. cuban, i would love to have you back. you are a smart guy and we want to hear from you from time to time. thanks for coming on. next on the rundown, yale university may honor the black panther party. can you believe it? we will tell you what is going on in new haven. later, bowe bergdahl, will he get off because of comments made by donald trump? we have the latest on that as "the factor" continues all across the usa on all around the world. z282uz zwtz

y282uy ywty

tech: don't let a cracked windshtrust safelite.plans. with safelite's exclusive "on my way text"... you'll know exactly when we'll be there. giving you more time for what matters most. (team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace.

>> bill: "impact segment" segment. as you know, yale university is an ivy league stalwart, very procedures institution. now, two controversy that may harm yale. first, the university is taking john calhoun's name off of one of the residential colleges. he served in the tenant for many years before the civil war. he was an ardent proponent of slavery. however, john f. kennedy named calhoun one of the greatest senators in history. i disagree with that assessment. also, the yale daily news come the student paper, is backing at printed that says the african-american cultural center at yale will honor the black panther party as part of black history month. joining us now from new haven, connecticut, gabby cudjoe-wilkes, a yale graduate student, and here in the studio, coyote tierney, a senior at yal. john calhoun, he was associated with the yale way back, gave them a lot of money, had a college named after him, right? but no more. >> no, sir. >> bill: what happened?

>> asserted about two years ago, the calhoun renaming process really picked up steam. then, they decided last april to not rename calhoun. they had a whole committee established over the summer. >> bill: who is they? >> the administration, the yale corporation. it >> bill: this was basically faculty members that did this? >> not so much faculty members. faculty and students wanted to the name changed -- >> bill: because of the slavery issue, right? >> yes, sir. >> bill: now, that is gone. it's been on, i assume you support the banishment of john john c calhoun, correct? >> i support the renaming of the college. we are still going to be -- remember his legacy. we are not erasing him. i do support the renaming of the college. >> bill: you know there is a lot of thomas jefferson, george washington, they were slaveholders. a lot of things named after the them. what is the difference? >> he is not just a slaveholder. not just someone who was a racist. he really built his legacy around and equality.

he is really an individual whose lifelong work was around any quality. he wasn't even really for the parts that say that all men are created equal. when you think about residential colleges, this is where the students are formed, a place of community. when you think about those names that we want on those institutions with those colleges within our institutions, it is important to think about that. >> bill: you are distinguishing between the legacy of calhoun and jefferson at washington. why do you think yale even name to the college after calhoun? surely, they knew, because he was not a quiet guy, it was all pretty much up front with him. surely, they knew who he was, why did they name it? >> i'm sure they didn't know. it is 2017. i know the conversation that we are and now, watches, we can look at our legacy, we can look at the history, and make decision based on who we are now as yale university. >> bill: you don't have any thought about why they would put up calhoun as a guide worthy of having a college named after him? you don't know? >> i have a lot of questions

about the decisions that have been made. >> bill: let's turn to the black panthers. the yale paper booted in, right? there is no honoring going on in new haven about the black panthers. what is there? >> i think it is students who want to be a part of a movement and they want to compare them getting calhoun renamed, being part of these protests against things that they represent. >> bill: wear to the black panthers command? ed is a black history month. >> it looked like a few students went in the fall to go visit a thing at berkeley that was presenting a story about the black panthers. >> bill: they will report back to yale about what their experiences are? >> i was a part of that. i -- >> bill: you went out there. >> i went out there. we were in oakland, it wasn't affiliated with the berkeley. it was a conference celebrating 50 years of the black panthers

forming. and we went out there as students to really learn the history, to chronicle it, to understand what is going on. you are probably familiar with the made a event that took plac. yale has a long history of activism. we went as students, to go out -- >> bill: did you come out with a favorable impression of the black panther movement? >> oh, absolutely. >> bill: let me have your react to a sound bite that we have from stokely carmichael, who was associated with the panthers. >> we have to recognize who our major enemy is! the major enemy is not your brother, flesh of your flesh and blood of your blood. the major enemy is his institutions of racism! that is the major enemy! >> bill: the white man, based on a pig reference. you must know that alex rackley, a black panther, in new haven. he was murdered there allegedly

by other black panthers. that was back in 1969. there is a long legacy of violence associated with even the new black ant panthers today. how can you look favorably upon that group? >> there is a long history of racism in this country. i think we can all agree that racism exists in this country. >> bill: do you think that black panthers are part of the racism with their antiwhite event? >> it wasn't about antiwhite, it is pro-black. it is about the making sure they provided for the community, food programs, health care programs. the language on the rhetoric is your choice. we are not using that language and rhetoric now. we are not using that rhetoric -- >> bill: it makes me a little uneasy that a very intelligent woman like yourself could even think that these people were worthy of being considered in black history month. because they are not that much different than the ku klux klan. >> oh, while matt, really? >> bill: if you look at the

history -- >> i'm interested to see how you compare the two. >> bill: if you look at the history of all of the black panthers, although shootings come all the violence, all the rhetoric, the police officers killed, over the top, antiwhitee violence and antiblack rhetoric of the kkk, there is not a lot of difference. the kkk did community programs, as well. i will give you the last word because i really appreciate you coming on. i will ask you a personal favor to me. reassess the black panthers situation. there are groups that are far, far better for you to tout as helping african-americans. but go ahead, last word. >> last word. but i would say is that the black panthers were pro-black. they made sure that their community was provided for, every organization makes a decision in a time but they are in. however, yale, we are studying at archiving and making decisions for ourselves that what our future looks like. i am privileged to have been able to be a part of that cohort that went to oakland to study that living history. >> bill: kyle, gabby,

thank you very much. directly had, a powerful democratic senator has had his party as lost its way. later, we will analyze whether the trump administration is on tv too much. "the factor" is coming right back. oh, hey, rob. what's with the minivan? it's not mine. i don't -- dale, honey, is your tummy still hurting, or are you feeling better to ride in the front seat? oh! is this one of your motorcycling friends? hey, chin up there, dale. lots of bikers also drive cars. in fact, you can save big if you bundle them both with progressive. i'd like that. great. whoo. you've got soft hands. he uses my moisturizer. see you, dale. bye, rob.

♪ heigh ho ♪ heigh ho ♪ heigh ho heigh ho it's off to work we go here's to all of you early risers, what's up man? go-getters, and should-be sleepers. from all of us at delta, because the ones who truly change the world, are the ones who can't wait to get out in it.

>> bill: "factor followup" segment tonight. trouble within the democratic party. on sunday, former senator jim webb from virginia, a well-regarded democrat, said this. >> the democratic party for the past five or six years have moved very far to the left. when you can't have a jefferson, jackson dinner, which was the primary celebratory event of the democratic party for years because jefferson and jackson were slaveholders, they were also great americans in their day, something different has

happened to the democratic party. >> do you think they are too focused on identity politics? >> i think that the message that has been shaped by the democratic party has been shaped toward identity politics. they have lost the key part of their base, the people -- >> bill: joining us now from washington, lisa boothe and juan williams. juan, it used to be that democrats held fundraisers under the banner of jefferson jackson dinner's. but you can't do that anymore. it is like john calhoun is out the window, jefferson and jackson are out of the democratic party window. what is going on? >> i think obviously, you have the base of the democratic party now as black, latino, educated, young people. i think they are attitude toward jefferson, jackson, and the old part of the democratic party is that they are not comfortable with it, they don't like it, especially, as they were discussing in the previous segment, you have the reaction to the fact that many people were involved with slavery,

slaveholders. remember, the older democratic party was the party of the segregationist south, especially after the civil war. so, to celebrate that, but this newer, 21st century constituency of the democratic party, it doesn't fit. >> bill: i think that is going to shrink the party even further, lisa, by turning their backs on thomas jefferson and people like that, it just becomes more radicalized. am i wrong? >> no, i absolutely agree with you, bill. i think it is not only the racial identity of politics, it is also focusing on gender, it is focusing on issues like transgender bathrooms are issuee more geordie of americans don't list these as their top issues. i think you can see the way it does impact the democratic party, by looking at the current house makeup. you have got more than one-third of democrats coming from california, massachusetts, and new york. two-thirds of democrats are from either the east or west coast. the problem for the democratic party, you got to be able to end these blue-collar states. you got to be able to win.

>> bill: do you think political correctness is strangling the democrats now? at really is out of control, to some extent. >> i don't think so. clearly, what you have, as a democratic party that i think is more in touch with the changing face of the country, right now -- >> bill: then, why is donald trump president? >> oh, i think donald trump was successful in winning the electoral college. he didn't win the electoral votes. >> bill: if you think of the democratic party is more in touch with the folks, that never would have happened, juan. >> no, no, no. i think donald trump stirred a lot of racial division in the country. but i think he also appealed, that is how he broke through state like michigan, wisconsin, where obama had won previously. suddenly, they went the other way. these people aren't racists. they just saw something different and what donald trump was offering, i think, was a strong appeal to blue-collar whites. >> bill: we will give you the

last word, lisa, let me ask you the same question. you think political correctness and strength to the democratic party? >> i do think is strangling the democratic party. what have we seen from them? we have only cmis can continue to shift to the left. right now, they are in the wilderness. they are trying to figure out how to get out, bill. if you look ahead to 2018, there are ten senate seats where democrats are running and states were president trump won. there are five of those states that he won by double digits. they are looking at a very red map. >> bill: it all depends on how the president does. thank you very much, guys. plenty more ahead as "the factor" moves ahead this long. military judge on the bowe bergdahl case it says he is disturbed by comments made by donald trump edge of the white house not being on much? we have some thoughts. and we hope you stay tuned for those reports.

i realize that ah, that $100k is not exactly a fortune.

well, a 103 yeah, 103. well, let me ask you guys. how long did it take you two to save that? a long time. then it's a fortune. well, i'm sure you talk to people all the time who think $100k is just pocket change. right now we're just talking to you. i told you we had a fortune. yes, you did. getting closer to your investment goals starts with a conversation. schedule a complimentary goal planning session today. >> bill: "unresolved problems" segment tonight. earlier this week, north korea launched a ballistic missile in violation of a u.n. mandate. they did that to provoke a response from president trump. here now is dana perino, spokesperson for bush the younger. i assume you are involved with a lot of conversations about these nuts, right? >> north korea was probably in the top 20 issues. >> bill: president bush labeled them one of the axis of

evil, along with iran and iraq. >> that was early on in 2002, in which he said that these are countries who are pursuing weapons of mass destruction and they are regimes that could have terrace pick up those weapons of mass destruction i could hurt other people. >> bill: there is the current leader, kim jong-un, you dealt with his father, who is as crazy as he is. >> i don't know, this one might take the cake. >> bill: okay. when you are dealing with a rogue outfit like this, president trump said, we will deal with them harshly, the only way to deal with them harshly is to blow them up, is that not? they are not going to listen to reason. >> i think that north korea is a special case, given that it is such a closed society. there is very little information. have you ever seen one of those map that shows electricity throughout the world, pretty much all dark. this leader starves his own people. they are in concentration camps. they are so brainwashed that

it's very hard to get information in or out. the one of the things that prest bush decided to do with that the clinton administration approach of offering concessions before they change their behavior, you are only going to get concessions if you change your behavior. >> bill: it didn't work. >> a remember specifically, july of 2006, fourth of july, great time, then, the north koreans always want attention. they are like a child, throwing a tantrum just around the time when you don't want it. we spent the rest of the time that evening trying to be with the fact that they had issued, sent off these missiles. now, they're doing it again. i'm not surprised they're doing it to president trump. >> bill: okay, i don't know if it is a problem, you have a different kind of president now. i would say that president bush and barack obama were much more restrained, at least in their rhetoric. >> certainly true. >> bill: so, trump is coming across as a guy that says, you

cross us, you are going to pay a heavy price. >> president trump campaign saying, i'm going to be unpredictable. then, he thinks that that is -- >> bill: that is pouring a lot of people. >> i think that because president trump had such a good meeting with the prime minister of japan, shinzo abe -- >> bill: that can help. the only ones that sway are the chinese. >> that is why president bush put together the six party talks to make sure that china, russia, japan, south korea, everybody was in the same direction. >> bill: do you feel that president trump will try the diplomacy route? >> i don't see any reason for him not to. i mean, what is the alternative? >> bill: he can blockade them. >> sanctions are one thing. >> bill: he can put a pretty big hurt on them. >> but you are dealing with a leader that starves his own people. >> bill: there are things you can do to north korea that would provoke the situation upward. i don't think that is to anybody's benefit.

they can't be shooting missiles off every three days. >> also, we need to understand better if weather capabilities are, they can shoot missiles off, but are they aggressive advancing? >> they have an atomic weapon. they have one. so, that has to be -- >> he seems willing to use it. >> bill: i think we should send dana over there to talk to the guys. >> [laughs] do see that his brother mysteriously turned up -- he was murdered? >> bill: who, kim jong-un's brother? is dead? >> you are going to send me over here? >> we will sent bodyguards with you. we will send hemmer with you. >> gutfeld, too, please. >> bill: no, you don't want to travel with him. will sergeant bowe bergdahl get his case thrown out because of comments made by president trump? we are investigating. the story is next. as a control enthusiast,

i'm all-business when i travel... even when i travel... for leisure. so i go national, where i can choose any available upgrade in the aisle - without starting any conversations- -or paying any upcharges. what can i say? control suits me. go national. go like a pro. trust #1 doctor recommended dulcolax. use dulcolax tablets for gentle dependable relief. suppositories for relief in minutes. and dulcoease for comfortable relief of hard stools. dulcolax. designed for dependable relief.

the markets change... at t. rowe price... our disciplined approach remains. global markets may be uncertain... but you can feel confident in our investment experience around the world. call us or your advisor... t. rowe price. invest with confidence. >> announcer: "the o'reilly factor," the number one cable news show for 16 years and counting. >> bill: thanks for staying with us. i am bill o'reilly. in the "law and order" segment, the fate of sergeant bowe bergdahl. he is charged with very serious crimes after leaving his post at afghanistan and putting his army unit in danger. president obama -- yesterday in north carolina, lawyers for bergdahl through military judge to throw out the case because oy

donald trump. >> we have guys like bergdahl to get caught, i mean, he left, he was a deserter. he was a deserter. he was a dirty, rotten deserter, and we knew he deserted it when we made the deal. now, why would you make a deal for a deserter? what do we do with sergeant bergdahl 50 years ago? that's right. boom. boom! >> bill: here now to analyze, eboni williams and kimberly guilfoyle. this trial is supposed to get underway in april, it has been going on forever, far too long. but the judge apparently said that he was disturbed by donald trump's statements, correct? >> okay, these were statements made by candidate trump and i haven't been any statements subsequent to him being sworn in and becoming the 45th president of united states. >> bill: surely, the judge knows that. >> nevertheless, he wants to make sure that there aren't any issues that specifically will have a litigation on the motion like this. it should not be granted. you cannot say that there -- it

should not be thrown out. they already tried to get a pardon odidn't work. they are try to do because of the popular thing to do -- >> bill: if i were his lawyer, i would try to get it thrown out. it is a military court, eboni, so, we are not going to be suggested to politics as he would in a civilian court. >> ideally. >> bill: ideally. you never know what is in a judges mind. he understands the seriousness of desertion. particularly because the charges are coupled with some soldiers getting hurt. >> hurts, absolutely. we have got then candidate trump saying that people were killed. we know that is debunked. i agree with -- >> bill: what you mean, people were killed? >> that is what candidate trump -- >> bill: that evidence has been debunked. >> we don't know that it is true. >> bill: but it hasn't been debunked. be careful. it is going to be presented in the trial. >> we don't have any evidence that it is factually correct. >> bill: we haven't seen him

at trial. >> when president trump said this, he is allowed to save us. but now, he is the commander-in-chief. a sitting united states president. i think for a lot of people, even in this military capacity, this five person panel, i don't know that he will be able to make a distinction. you can't unring the bell. although he -- i wouldn't throw it out either. i will argue it is a problem. >> bill: as it trust the judge making the decision? >> the judge will make the decision. >> bill: the ultimate trial? >> it is a five panel -- five-member panel. >> they can decide and help other people. if they are prejudiced by their statements, they can remove them. >> but you can't unring the bell. that's out there. >> bill: let's get to an immigration situation. there is a woman who was deported because she had identity theft, which is a felony, on her sheet. it was brought up last night. roll the tape. >> guadalupe garcia, she has been in this country for 23 years. look at what donald trump did. this is what donald trump did.

>> here is my question back to you -- >> this is exactly what donald trump, the deportations are, has been doing. >> bill: let's clear that up. the woman is not legal in this country, correct, eboni? >> that is correct. >> bill: jorge misled us. the children are. how old are the children? >> 14 and 16. >> they are u.s. citizens. guadalupe has been deported because she had, was it a felony conviction? now, are you okay with that, guilfoyle? >> i am okay. i have a serious problem of identity theft in this country, she committed a felony. >> bill: she has to go kids here. >> i understand that. she was giving some leniency under the obama administration. >> bill: you are okay with that?

>> i'm not saying that i'm happy for her and her family. i think it is disturbing. >> bill: >> the law is clear ans here illegally according to the law. my issue is this. it is inconsistent from what we have heard candidate trump say on the campaign trail. we are supposed to be -- >> bill: time crunch, as always. here's what i would do if i were the president. i would give her clemency. >> you are a gracious man. >> bill: no, no. that is true, of course. [laughter] but that would make his case, look, i'm going to sign clemency for this woman. she can come back and rejoin her teenagers here. but we don't want any more of this. we will concentrate other really bad -- >> the children are u.s. citizens. they have subsequently -- >> bill: b an amazing p.r. move. >> it would come of that, you are in establishing a president. >> bill: you are not establishing a president. she has the right to get clemency. >> may be saved that

political -- >> bill: got to go. gutfeld and mcguirk on deck. is it possible that the trump administration is on tv too much? then, tip of the day, zombies influencing the "the factor" ." ♪ her. just put on a breathe right strip. it instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than cold medicine alone. shut your mouth and say goodnight mouthbreathers. breathe right. a 401(k) is the most sound way to go. let's talk asset allocation. -sure. you seem knowledgeable, professional. would you trust me as your financial advisor? -i would. -i would indeed. well, let's be clear, here. i'm actually a deejay. ♪ [ laughing ] no way! i have no financial experience at all. that really is you? if they're not a cfp pro, you just don't know. find a certified financial planner professional who's thoroughly vetted at letsmakeaplan.org. cfp. work with the highest standard.

a farmer's market.ve what's in this kiester. a fire truck. even a marching band. and if i can get comfortable talking about this kiester, then you can get comfortable using preparation h. for any sort of discomfort in yours. preparation h. get comfortable with it.

>> bill: "back of the book" segment tonight. what the heck just happened? it seems every time from the trump administration goes on television, there is controversy. >> in the end, it was misleading the vice president that made the situation unsustainable. >> which the white house knew about last month. and yet, yesterday, he went on the air and said that general flynn had the complete and full confidence of the president. >> bill: here now to analyze, bernard mcguirk and

greg gutfeld. i'm not sure all these tv appearances are helping the trump administration, gutfeld. >> i don't think they care. when i look at her appearance, she sees absolutely. she treats tv like i treat waxing. it is not a priority in my life. >> bill: are you talking about waxing your car? >> some people call it a car. anyway, she is not worth -- her predecessor, which had the charm of a yg. >> bill: to get up at five in the morning to do these morning shows, put yourself at risk, you know you are going to be attacked on every show except "fox & friends," they will like you a little bit. i don't understand -- >> in her case, let's face it. she is very impressive, she broke the big glass ceiling. she's a mother. >> bill: she is on every day. >> she turned out to be a killer on the cable news talk shows. as a female trump supporter -- >> bill: do you really believe that all of these things are

necessary? >> she took on all these guys, the taws, the tappers, the lower's, she kicked their butts for a long, long time. she emasculated these guys. now, she looks a little tired. she needs a little time off. >> bill: >> bill: she needs a c. >> she needs to go kite surfing with the obama's. >> she is 50 years old, she's got four kids. dealing with the press is the easiest part of her day. >> bill: i don't think the obama -- the trump administration is understanding that everything they say can and will be used against them. they should be mirandized before they go on. then, the satire program take. roll the tape. >> what the hell are you doing here? >> i just want to be a part of the news, jake. >> and this is how you do it? by breaking into my apartment? >> it was i supposed to do? you weren't answering your calls, you changed your number. i am not going to be ignored! >> bill: you don't get it, you made a pie massacre. we can't have you on.

>> but i miss the news. >> bill: see, that is not helpful, gutfeld. >> i disagree. kate mckinnon doing a vicious impersonation means that you won. if she was doing a reverential impersonation of hillary clinton, that means kate one. she has to do this, knowing that her side lost. she is making fun of kellyanne conway, knowing that she lost! and it kills her to have to do that? >> bill: do you see that? >> she is trying to take down a good, strong woman. >> it is sexist. >> it is sexist indeed. she is a tough woman. she needs to be cut some slack. that smug matt lauer was getting his beauty sleep and has produced over writing his questions for him, she was up all night pulling an all-nighter to figure out what to say about this general flynn situation. this woman needs credit. >> bill: but because the day before, she said there was no trouble. >> but she is defending the indefensible. >> bill: i agree with you guys guys.

she needs a rest. >> gets more people out there. >> bill: get more people. [laughter] >> and animals, too, would be fun. >> bill: i think the messaging has to be a little bit more disciplined. all right, gutfeld and mcguirk, there they are. "tip of the day" ," eboni seen d "the walking dead." "the tip," moments away.

>> bill: "tip of the day, the walking dead versus the factor. but first, the male. let me get this straight, adam, you are equating the issue of

criminal aliens rolling around the country with a crowd and speculation about voter fraud? come on, man. that information came directly from homeland security. because it is not a fact. it is your opinion. and that is a reactionary opinion, just so you know. not a fact.

we have an obligation to invite her if we are going to analyze her comments. but i would be very surprised if miss meryl streep would show up to discuss these things. i might even keel over if that happens. you know, i don't know. it was no such effort, chris. at its finest. [laughs]

thanks, for bringing that history to us. you're welcome. finally, tonight, the factor "tip of the day," the only shows on cable that beat us where the walking dead and the talking dead on amc. for a while, i thought the walking dead was the bio of former senator harry reid. how wrong i was! the walking dead are zombies who chase people around in slow motion. kind of place thematic the loss rams. we are thinking of incorporating some of that into "the factor." what about a segment about how obamacare can subsidize zombies, most of which don't have jobs

because employers frown upon cannibalism in the marketplace. if i.c.e. rounds up zombies in the country illegally, will radicals insist on open borders for the undead? here is a tip, we are seeing some very unusual things, as we become more inclusive on "the factor" and sensitive to those who are dead but not buried. as the ninth circuit appeals said, you don't necessarily have to be alive to vote. that is it for us tonight. please check out the fox news packed a web site, from billoreilly.com. word of the day, do not be a

buffoon. or a zombie. again, thank you for watching us tonight. i am bill o'reilly. please remember, the spin stops here. we are definitely looking out for you. >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight," tonight, a former mexican official said that if the president trump does build a wall, mexico ought to stop helping the united states. even if that laws that means ag terrorists in. but first, general michael flynn, we hardly knew you. the national security advisor is gone after spending less than a month in the white house. he was brought down after his conversation with russia was wiretapped by u.s. intelligence. even though they were supposed to block such