double standard on the special prosecutor idea where was it of the scandals of the last few year and dianne feinstein saying it's time. >> bill: we hasn't been approved yet and we'll see how it go throughout the day. we have to run. bye-bye. >> jon: reaction is pouring and now for a republican plan to replace obamacare. it is getting panned from the left and the right. president trump has come out and support. good morning, welcome to "happening now" ." >> jenna: he calls for tax credit. democrats don't like this and republicans say it doesn't go far enough and breaking up obamacare. a pulse as americans are split down the middle. 50% opposing removing the individual mandate that all americans pay health insurance.

we are going to the white house in just a moment, for now, we are going to capitol hill for more this very topic. >> let me be clear, our plan is the first step. under our plan, we are moving forward any positive direction to rescue the individual insurance markets and to give flexibility to our states. we are protecting those nations living with pre-existing conditions under our plan. we are not returning to the day of a lifetime or annual limits, and we will continue to allow young adults to remain on their parents policies until they reach the age of 26. we will keep our promise not to pull the rug up from anyone, including those on medicaid. we are also creating a new and innovative patient and state stability fund to help low

income americans afford health care and to repair the damage done to state insurance markets by obamacare. we return power back to the states. we strengthen medicaid and we prioritize help for a nation's most vulnerable. simply put, we believe we have a better way to deliver solutions to patients, not washington bureaucrats, first. we provide the make and people with what we've asked for and what they've asked for, greater choice, lower costs, and flexibility to choose a plan that best suits their families needs. introduction of this bill is just the first step in helping american families across the country gain truly affordable health care and we are eager to get started. now turned over to my colleague. >> thank you all of you for joining us today. seven years ago, obama put washington in control of america's health care.

for seven long years, this feeling law has hurt more people than it's helped. families can afford their premiums. patients can't visit the doctor that they like, and fewer insurers are offering coverage options every day. it's getting worse. with president trump now in office, house republicans are taking action to deliver relief to americans now. this week, house republicans have introduced legislation to repeal this filling law and help ensure americans have access to tailor to their needs, not health care dictated and tailored to washington's needs. the american health care act power back to. we restore state control of health care so it can be designed for the families and communities in each state. americans have a greater choice of product to tailored to what

they need, with their families need. our role is to first act now, dismantle obama cares unpopular. people can spend their health care tax dollars the way they need to and we are going to help low income americans access affordable health care. it's immediately available. secretary price wrote today of this morning, our legislation aligns with the of the president's goals of rescuing americans from the failures of the affordable care act. secretary price also wrote that our bill is necessary in an important first step for fulfilling our promises to the american people. i encourage you to read the bill and cover our actions tomorrow.

this bill is available to the american public. contrast this to the american care act. this legislation is a little over 100 pages and every american can read and understand it. house republicans promise to deliver it step-by-step to provide relief from obamacare. we take the critical first step tomorrow. >> we'd be happy to take your questions. >> you been criticized for years were pushing through obamacare, but now, nobody knows how much it's going to cost. >> the bill went online live for the entire american people, all of you, all of us to read at

6:00 last night. it's pretty well understood. it keeps you in practice with legislation. when the democrats did reconciliation, that's pretty much how it operates. it will proceed with our markups. they'll be a score coming and we look forward to that when it comes to the house floor. >> critics are already blasting this as obamacare light. what do you say to that? >> last week, we walked through with them the various provision provisions, i'd encourage them to read the bill, find out what's in it, i've handed over notes and copies to some of the senators reviewing the bill. we are repealing an replacing

obamacare. we are moving forward to get health insurance to create more choices in the marketplace and to do the biggest entitlement reform since bill clinton signed welfare reform into law. we certainly met the test of the president and secretary price who believe this. we will work with them, but we need them on board to make this happen. >> i might add. this is obamacare gone. this is important to relieving americans from this terrible law and begin restoring control in the free market to conservatives, moderates, all republicans that build consensus around. dr. price own legislation last year, i had 84 cosponsors,

including members and leaders of the freedom caucus, the rfc, and the republican conference. we are following a consensus. here is my main as republicans, we have a choice. we can act now, or we can keep fiddling around and squander this opportunity to repeal obamacare and begin a new chapter for the american people. house republicans are choosing to act now. [inaudible question] >> we've held a lot of listening

sessions with our congress members. i've met individually with the leaders from various groups within our conference. we've had sessions over the weekend with the white house and various folks there. it is a legislative process. we now have a bill that's available for all to read and i encourage them to do it. i would encourage them to look against their own bills and what they supported in the past, and then let's have a thoughtful legislative discussion. there is a process for our committees, there is a process for the budget committee, there's a process for the rules committee and that it will come to the floor. this is an important step coming forward to fulfill our promise they marking people to repeal and replace obamacare. >> how many people are covered? >> it's interesting, because if you go back to what was predicted to be covered in the exchange today, there only off by a 2-1 ratio.

the worst part of that is we are chasing young people away from insurance coverage through the various obamacare mandates. as a result, 45% of those people who decided not to sign up for obamacare and pay the penalty instead or get an exclusion are the people under the age of 35. we need to reform those markets so we can give options that are affordable and available to more people that come onto insurance coverage. we also believe to reform under medicaid will allow states to drag more of their dollars into coverage, rather than the bureaucratic processes have to go through to get wafers. [inaudible question] >> we have been listening very carefully to house republicans,

the entire conference, across the philosophical spectrum about how best to restore faith and how best to return a free market and how to make sure we do that in a way that balances the budget. we look very seriously at the option of providing the same health care. at the end of the day, the direction they gave us was that was not a provision they were comfortable today, so we decided against it, to go in a different direction. >> will cover more americans are less americans? >> that's probably the key question. here's how i know it affects us in our districts. more people have opted out, found a way to get out of obamacare then are taking it.

those who have it, frankly, can't use it. the deductibles are too high, the copayments are too high. it's just a card. it doesn't help them. under our approach, by returning innovation to the states, actually giving americans a broad choice to plans they can actually use, i believe we are increasing access to affordable care for those who want it. i think that's an important distinction here. as i see the tax credits, i have a small business background, it's chamber of congress. for 4 decades, i watched a small people, entrepreneurs, mom-and-pop companies struggle to get health care. under the republican plan for the first time, if you work hard and play by the rules, you're treated equally. you can that help as an entrepreneur. those businesses, frankly,

aren't taking the affordable care act. it doesn't help them. >> here's what we do know. last year, 225 counties in america had one option left for people to choose from on the exchange. this year, it's 1,022 knots before humana pulled out. this is collapsing before our eyes. the ceo of aetna said his own death spiral. those aren't our words, those are his words and he is in that market. they're looking where they can sustain the losses that they are enduring because of the way the markets created. the fact of the matter is not what this will do or won't do going forward. we've arrived at the scene of a pretty big rack and we are trying to clean up the mess. we're not taking anybody off medicaid plates on it today, you can read that in the bill pretty clearly. where giving power back to the states, decision-making back to the states, and hopefully have

affordable insurance of people could take advantage of. when 1 out of 3 counties of america and next year were hearing there be zero, that's the gap that we are trying to close. [inaudible question] >> i believe secretary price believes that an president trump leaves that based on the letter they sent us. >> we are waiting to give us te score. >> when do you think that?

>> that's up to cbo. >> we are looking at continuous coverage, this is not a novel concept, by the way. you can still find a similar version of this to cover pre-existing conditions and medical part b, medicare part d and in the employer market. we modeled it after that. one of the issues we found is that some people were gaming the system with guaranteed issue. it is not they had a pre-existing condition necessarily, it's that they paid for nine months of insurance, get 12, the other automatically come back into market. that's part of what's causing the spiral downward. what we want to make sure is that if you have a pre-existing condition, unit coverage. and that coverage is not rated on that condition, it's if you let it lapse, if you didn't pay the premium, there is a marginal

penalty there going backwards. it's a little bit like you don't abide by your insurance for your house on the roof is on fire, you have to buy ahead of time. it's a little different, i realize when it comes to health care, but the concept is continuous coverage. you can have a gap of 63 days, basically that's two months. our goal is to make sure that if you have a pre-existing health condition, you're not denied insurance. [inaudible question] >> i would disagree. i look at the 20,000 jobs that have left america because of the irresponsible medical device tax. i look at the health insurance taxes and others that drove up health care costs on americans,

especially those who can least afford it. you run down tax increase after tax increase after tax increase favoring the economy, they achieve nothing. i don't want americans to continue to struggle under the obamacare taxes, which is why we are moving to repeal them, as well as the subsidies and a thing of the day, as you all know, for this to pass the senate, it has to balances on the budget in the window that we've been given and will make sure it does. >> on the side that we are focused on, very little from the standpoint of repealing the taxes, appeals on the mandate and the subsidies as well, making sure that we are defunding land parenthood and redirecting those dollars to

immunity health centers so women have those services where they need them. we use the 2015 reconciliation bill as the foundation for appeal, but we go farther with those two key principles which is returning state control so communities can get health care design for them, restoring the free market so people can choose health care they need. >> from our standpoint, i think we have drafted the biggest reform in 20 plus years by going to a per capita back to the state. i don't believe that was in the 2015 reconciliation bill. i believe that's really important to re-empower states and to put medicaid on a budget. that's probably the biggest stability fund. there's been on this damage done to the market itself, we want states to be able to come in, whether it's texas or oregon, we have vastly different

decision-making that's gone on in health care in our states to be able to help out. >> is that going to be an annual decision by congress? >> i think it's a 100 billion fund over ten years. they know it's coming. >> we've talked to a lot of states, as you and imagine. we've had some very productive discussions. i don't believe they'll be allowed to expand if they haven't expended before, but if they have the expansion, they can add new people on until december 31st of 2019. why do we do that? because the states have told us and others have informed us that you've got to have a transition period that works for the people on medicaid and that works until

mr. brady's tax pieces up onlin online. what we are trying to do is what we pledged we would do, is not pull the rug out from anybody, make sure there's a transition to a better way with more policies, more opportunities, and a more fair health care system. [inaudible question] >> clearly, we have an economy that's struggling. we've got young people that can't find good paying jobs, a lot of people have given up. part of this is to remove the damaging we think job killing the taxes and the portable care

act. also, it fits into our vision of the tax reform proposal that's billed for growth. for jobs, wages in the u.s. economy. the key element of the tax credit is that it is really targeted and tailored to the individual. it's a cry that's immediately available to them. it grows and increases with age, because her health care costs go up as you get older. and expands with her family because you have greater needs as a family. it's a credit that you can take from small business to small business, from state to state, home, if you're starting a business or raising a family, even as are approaching retirement. this is unprecedented freedom. i would note too, in this legislation, thanks to the work of chairman walden, those on the aca today who are watching this slowly collapse, they'll be able

to buy off the exchanges including catastrophic coverage, it's very important to them as we make this transition. it is very carefully and liberally thought out. thank you. >> jenna: a few questions answered right there on a wide variety of topics about what this new proposal by republicans really includes, as you heard they are, you can read the bill yourself. readthebill.g.o.p. ourchiefwhite housecorrespondent john robertshasbeencoveringthest orycloseweb close

webdon'tforget,thiswasunderthebi g centerpiecesofpresident trump'sc ampaign .com mick mulvaney was out this morning making the rounds to sell some of the key features of the new bill. listen to what he said. >> the mandates and obamacare are gone. the tags and obamacare are gone. the penalties and obamacare are gone. we've taken the government out of the equation they need to be between patients and their doctors and that's gone. >> hears some of the key provisions under the new bill, you are the german talking about this. for people who don't get insurance to their employers who can buy it themselves and the tax credits, as the chairman pointed out, goes up as the person gets older.

it also maintains coverage for pre-existing conditions and keeps the precision with an obamacare. people can stay on their parents plan until age 26. a couple of notable things that are not our in this bill, thers not an ability to negotiate the cost of lower drugs. i letter of support from the secretary of health and human services, tom price, sent him to the hill to the chairman this morning, procedural rules do not allow for provisions to side across state lines or to lower the cost of drugs. president trump tweeted out this morning, "don't worry, getting rid of state lines, which will promote competition, will be in phase 2 and 3 of healthcare rollout. he also tweeted out "i am working on a new system where there will be competition in the drug industry. pricing for the american people will come way down!"

a lot of this is still new. you heard the chairman talking about the fact that this is not been scored by the congressional budget office, which means they do not yet have a cost estimate for how much this is going to cost. conservatives right now, who are very critical of this bill just on the surface, may become more critical of it if it looks like it's going to cost a lot of money or it could ameliorate their fears. something else happening this morning, that we wanted to point out to you. the renewed white house tours that were on a pause after the inauguration. take a look at this as president trump met a group of children here in the east wing of the white house. [cheers and applause] a >> was really about that picture is that the president was greeting this group of

children beneath a portrait of hillary clinton there just inside the white house. clearly, the president popular with this group of young people opening the white house back up to tours again. >> jenna: it was one of the first things that we notice, along with that brave little boy by the way. john, thank you very much. >> jon: talking more about the g.o.p. obamacare replacement plan, opinions on it and on obamacare are split across the country. a new poll from cnn, 46% of americans generally favor the a formal care act as it stands right now. 49% say they oppose it. debates in the house and start this week.we just heard from ke, the chairman of the house and greg walden, as they weighed l.

"are physically responsible plan will return controlled from washington back to the states so they can tailor their health care systems to their unique communities." let's talk about it with elia johnson and charlie hurt, columnist with the washington times, also a fox news contributor. charlie, this bill hasn't been scored yet by the congressional budget office, so, how can the two leaders of those two communities be so confident that's going to reduce costs? >> obviously, this is been the problem from the beginning. taking that away is going to be a very difficult thing. people are complaining that anything you do at this point is going to be obamacare light. they do have a point about it. it's obviously not going to take

away all of those things and obamacare extended. putting up some sort of pressures on obamacare to encourage cost savings and things like that is at least a step in the right direction. i think it's a bit of a misnomer to call it obamacare light. you're right, once he gets scored and once we see with the pricing is going to be, then we'll get a better idea of how members in the house are going to feel, how happy they'll be with this. my suspicion -- no matter what they come up with, it's really going to be hard to support. at least it will be better than obamacare. >> jon: that's the interesting thing is going to ask you about. how may times of the republic and house vote to repeal obamacare? more than 50 times. now that they have, the house and the senate, republicans

cannot all get on board apparently behind one plan. there is a significant republican opposition to this proposal. >> i'm glad charlie was a that it will be tough to get him on this train. republicans can only afford to lose two votes in the senate and 12 votes in the house. it's really significant that three senators, rand paul, ted cruz, and mike lee have already said that if this bill doesn't go as far as the 2015 and 2016 obamacare repeal versions that were passed in the house does, and it is not, that they will not support it. going into these committees where this bill is going to get work done, the house is going to have to go further in order to get enough senate votes for it to pass the senate and make it to the president's desk. i also think it significant that in the president's tweet today

he said that this fantastic bill is now up on the web site and he is ready to negotiate. i do think he leaves the door open. we see much more stronger language from the president and he could have said take it or leave it, house republicans have certainly been tough with them. he didn't do that. i think he knows there are some negotiating to be done or this bill will not pass congress. >> jon: as john roberts was telling us when white house moments ago, some of the proposals the republicans generally like, those cannot be in this bill right now, because then it would not be a "reconciliation bill" which is one of the procedural rules of the senate. >> all of that comes down to basically people's trust in president trump to actually make good on his promises to pressure congress to do those things.

i do think there is wide support for doing that, at least among republicans. all along, donald trump has not always been the most precise speaker in the world, but he's very good at selling things, he's very good at pushing his promises. we've also seen he's very good at keeping them. i expect that this will not be over with this current bill. i do think that the president will push very hard for this and i think he will campaign around the country to make sure his other provisions get done as well. >> jon: our ace producer on capitol hill is out with news release. they are in opposition to this proposal. as chad points it, they are bearing the g.o.p. bill, the bill is in trouble. we'll see where it goes from here. thank you both.

>> jenna: multiple intelligent officials under president obama saying they never tapped the phones are president trump or his campaign, but our next guest, and nsa veteran a whistleblower will explain head there's nothing more than my vacation.me so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. they offer free cancellation, in case i decide to go from kid-friendly to kid-free. now i can start relaxing even before the vacation begins.

your vacation is very important. that's why booking.com makes finding the right hotel for the right price easy. visit booking.com now to find out why we're booking.yeah

hi! hey! i've made plans for later in case this date doesn't go well. likewise! but, funny story. on top of that? my mom is my best friend. uh oh. yeah. oop! there's the rescue text from my roommate saying she needs me. wouldn't it be great if everyone said what they meant? the citi double cash card does. it lets you earn double cash back: the citi double cash card. >> there is no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time as a candidate or against his campaign. >> jenna: the former director of national intelligence denying

that president trump is ever wiretapped. the agency has also denied president trump's expose of allegations over the weekend. in fact, bill hemmer spoke moments ago with monroeville hayden. >> jon: what you think was going on at trump tower last summer? >> in my heart of hearts? nothing that has to do with electronic surveillance on the part of the united government. >> jenna: bill, great to have you on the program. >> great to be with you. >> jon: what's your response to what michael hayden just set on our program? >> that includes several

subprograms that are fiber-optic taps with the assistance of the intelligence companies, more than 100 of them across united states. that's why they have to keep building larger and larger storage facilities, because they're collecting more and more as the years go on. >> jenna: let me back up a little bit. there's been so much focus on the fbi, fisa warrants, based on your experience, what kind of surveillance on american citizens can be done without a warrant? >> none. that should be the rule. if they don't have a warrant against the u.s. citizen, they shall be collecting data. they're collecting data on every u.s. citizen without a warrant. you can look at the original bit of evidence released back in

june 2013, the fisa court order to tell him to turn over all the data on a proximally 110 million u.s. citizens. there is no probable cause at all there. that acquisition was recently ruled by the second circuit court of appeals as illegal in 2015. >> jenna: is that your assertion that every american citizen continues to be spied on by the nsa? >> absolutely. there is no warrant or oversight by congress or the courts. >> jenna: how is that happening? >> it's all done by executive orders and it's done with cooperation with the telecommunications company. that's one of the reasons they had to get immunity back in 2008. they were sifting in this process. >> jenna: i'm going to try to make this even more simple. we as an example yesterday in our program talking about fisa

warrants, because i wanted to get our viewers a sense of what it takes to get a >> sandra: in warrant. let's say hypothetically, the fbi was curious about communications with syria. and a question about how that data collected was used, make munication probably wasn't happening with syria, but with my team at fox news. can you take that same scenario and bring it over to the nsa? i want our ureters to be clear how could the nsa do a dive into my data right now? >> very simply, because they collect the entire set of data flowing across the fiber-optic lines inside the united states. no matter where they end up, if it goes to foreign countries or stays domestically. they have all the data already stored in their storage facilities and they simply interrogate it by our phone number, your ip address, or any

other signature, banking accounts or credit cards, things like that. >> jenna: if somebody wanted to do a deep dive into the data that i have, they would plug in my phone number and they would have access to the data? >> yes. the speech that applied to me, jon scott, vito, and the president of the nine states to america? >> that is correct. >> jenna: who has access to that data? so they could go through this phone number to see if anything question was happening, who has access to that data? was mining the data? >> my estimate would be between three and 6,000 people inside the intelligence community. that would include the fbi. it goes routed directly into the nsa databases.

>> jenna: this continues to that day. could that be easily reversed, taking way that executive order? could president trump change it? >> yes, he could. all he would have to do is eliminate the section where it says that if you are going after a drug dealer or other criminals on a communications line, you can take the whole line and maintain it, even if it involves u.s. citizens communications and store it and keep it indefinitely for data mining. that basically says they can take the entire communications of the world, including everything in the united states, capture, and store it, and mine it. >> jenna: there's a lot of online shopping online. i don't mean to be flippant

about it, there's a lot of serious munication's online as well. there is a something interesting happened in the final weeks of president obama's administration. issued an executive order that allowed sharing between agencie agencies. who has their hands on it and how can you be mine? >> that expands who has access to these databases. it actually opens up the opportunities for greater numbers of leaks. >> jenna: interesting. that's where we are today. a lot of anonymous sources and one has to wonder where the leaks are coming from, which is why i wanted to talk to you today. again, american citizens, not guilty of committing crimes, with no warrants, being

surveilled, and that data collected, placed somewhere, where many people have their hands and access to it. is that of the current reality? >> yes, and it's been that way for quite a while. there were some transcribing phone calls between u.s. citizens and that's been going on since 2001. they may say one thing publicly, in secret behind closed doors, they're doing subbing different. >> jenna: perhaps a broader conversation needs to continue. it's is just the beginning, we appreciate your time and look forward to having you back. thank you. >> jon: another big story today, the notable changes made to the present revised executive order on immigration. it will break them all down and asked when what mean ahead if you have medicare

parts a and b and want more coverage, guess what?

you could apply for a medicare supplement insurance plan whenever you want. no enrollment window. no waiting to apply. that means now may be a great time to shop for an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. medicare doesn't cover everything. and like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, these help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide. it could help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. these types of plans have no networks, so you get to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. rates are competitive, and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. remember - these plans let you apply all year round. so call today. because now's the perfect time to learn more. go long.

we were in a german dance group. i wore lederhosen. so i just started poking around on ancestry. then, i decided to have my dna tested through ancestry dna. it turns out i'm scottish. so, i traded in my lederhosen for a kilt.

>> jon: turning out to that new immigration order, the administration aims to end the legal troubles stemming from the first order with several notable changes, like a much slower rollout. the ban goes into effect next week. iraq is removed from the list of affected countries. current visa holders are now exempted. syrian refugees parted temporarily, not indefinitely, well refugees minority religions no longer get preferential treatment. refugees already granted asylum will be allowed to stay. references to support for the constitution and other beliefs are removed, and detailed about why the six countries were selected in the first place. joining us north to reveal some of these changes, barbara smith, former law clerk to justice alito, jr., who worked for george w. bush and elizabeth.

thanks both of you for being here. barbara, to you first, and your view, do these changes and the legal wrangling about this band? >> i think there's a possibility that states that challenged the first order will challenge the second one, but i think they'll have a significant uphill battle for a number of reasons. first, i think the due process concerned raised were eliminate eliminated. by making clear that it doesn't go into effect until march 16th which means everyone is on notice about what the order says and when it will come into effect. as it pertains to the claims brought into challenge, those are alleviated by the fact that they are very carefully catalogued. in many ways, i think the order is a lot safer than it was at first.

>> jon: elizabeth, do you agree? at >> don't agree. it's still a muslim man and we must take into account -- over and over, donald trump and his surrogates have said they wanted to prevent muslim immigration. that's what donald trump's web site still says to this day. the constitution says the government can cannot use govet in that way. with the shaky national security justification, i don't think it's very carefully detailed. in fact, a report repudiates saying that nationality or citizenship of country is not a good predictor of whether or not a country will bring terrorism

later. that leaves an uphill climb in the courts. just as we saw the first time with the courts immediately subbing into block the muslim man. >> jon: the most populous muslim country in the world is indonesia. if this were a muslim man, why choose just those six countries? >> it's been clear that you don't need to discriminate every civil person in order to have a discriminatory policy deemed discriminatory. the administration has been very clear in their statements that while they might focus on territory, will really what they were trying to do was prevent muslims from entering the country. that is not just unconstitutional, it goes against fundamental american values. a >> jon: barbara, very quickly, we are about to get cut off by the computer and 15 seconds. is it muslim ban? >> absolutely not.

i think it will be really hard-pressed to make a stronger statement. >> jon: barbara smith, elizabeth, thank you. we'll be back in a moment ♪

everything your family touches sticks with them. make sure the germs they bring home don't stick around. use clorox disinfecting products. because no one kills germs better than clorox. i love to see businesses that just started from ground up grow into further success. it just feels good to know that i'm helping someone else.

my first goal is to learn about their business, what they're currently doing in their advertising. pull some research, create a great story. trying to figure out some way of building some kind of trust in a very quick moment. you have to love to work with people. our goal, without a doubt, is that all customers are satisfied before they leave. ♪

>> jon: justin, a new and dramatic release from wikileaks says it will post thousands of documents it says come from the cia's centers of intelligence. benjamin hall live in london with more. >> another massive wikileaks drop a trove of information from inside the government. this time, over 8,000 pages from the cia's hacking program. this is another very embarrassing leak from inside the government.

wikileaks wasn't supposed to have a press conference this morning, they said they were being hacked and were unable to do that. they got the documents out earlier than that and claimant came from an isolated building. they claimed that some of the remote hacking programs can turn and electronic devices into recording and transmitting stations to spy on their targets. the information being sent back to secret cia services. at the documents include information on cia development malware meant to target smart systems. he had initially promised to leave the embassy of chelsea man -- what wikileaks is saying is

it's the most dangerous thing here is the proliferation of this hacking. if other sources get that, he could be used against the u.s. wikileaks says they were doing this for the greater good and wants to know what the cia hacking process is about. >> jon: brave new world. benjamin hall, thank you. >> jenna: and our next hour of happening now, the first televised meeting in more than a week. tori is let's take a look at some numbers:

4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom... is a stroke. 80 percent of all strokes and heart disease? preventable. and 149 dollars is all it takes to get screened and help take control of your health. we're life line screening... and if you're over 50... call this number, to schedule an appointment... for five painless screenings that go beyond regular check-ups. we use ultrasound technology to literally look inside your arteries...

for plaque which builds up as you age- and increases your risk for stroke and cardiovascular disease. and by getting them through this package, you're saving over 50%. so call today and consider these numbers: for just $149 you'll receive five screenings that could reveal what your body isn't telling you. i'm gonna tell you that was the best $150 i ever spent in my life. life line screening. the power of prevention. call now tow to learn more.

why do so many businesses rely on the u.s. postal service? because when they ship with us, their business becomes our business. ♪ that's why we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country. ♪ here, there, everywhere. united states postal service priority : you >> jon: would have a fascinating second hour coming up, including a report on why all those north korean missile failures seem to have occurred. it will talk with a "new york times" reporter who broke that story. >> jenna: that will be fascinating. >> jon: "outnumbered" starts right now.

>> harris: a fabulous start with what's happening in the pacific region, where tensions are high. china is boring morning it wile action against south korea. the two allies say the system is purely defensive. they say it was practice for hitting u.s. bases there. we'll have much more on this breaking news as we learn more. >> sandra: and is finally here, after years in the making, house republicans finally revealing their plan to repeal and replace obamacare. two of the architects of the bill, just wrapping up a news conference. this has democrats gearing up for a fight while some republicans remain on the fence. this isn't "outnumbered," sandra smith. here today, harris faulkner, meghan mccain, fox news poli