tv Justice With Judge Jeanine FOX News March 12, 2017 6:00pm-7:01pm PDT
6:00 pm
you know, i don't see the resemblance at all. show's over. be sure to follow me on facebook, twitter and especially instagram. "justice with judge jeanine" is up next, and remember, i'm watters, and this is my world. . judge jeanine: right now on "justice" -- strikes and spares for health care. president trump's treating republicans to pizza and bowling to get them in line on the plan to fix obamacare. >> so we've begun preparing to repeal and replace obamacare. judge jeanine: some lawmakers say it false short. can he sell it? plus lawmakers give the president a monday deadline to prove evidence of his wiretap claim. >> president trump has to provide the american people not just intelligence committee, but the american people with evidence that his predecessor, former president of the united
6:01 pm
states was guilty of breaking the law. judge jeanine: can they do that? and can married men become priests. >> terrific guy here. they ought to be looking at females for priests. judge jeanine: pope francis is thinking about it. and later, it's an all-new street justice. >> if phones are being tapped, what would be the most embarrassing thing? >> that bad? >> was it fun? >> at the time, yes! [laughter]. judge jeanine: "justice" starts now. hello, and welcome to special sunday edition of "justice". i'm judge jeanine pirro, thanks for being with us tonight. we have got a full show ahead, but first, a big blizzard is setting its sights on the northeast. meteorologist has the latest. >> this is a big one, targeting the northeast, large area now
6:02 pm
stretching from virginia all the way up to into portions of maine. the pink color is a warning, a little more severe, and then i can take you a little tighter. look at new york city. all of this green is a blizzard watch. you get this when you get conditions where it's a whiteout. very heavy snow, very strong winds, that's something we're looking forward to coming late tuesday, monday night into tuesday. i'm going time that out for you in just a minute. here's what it looks like on satellite and radar two. systems make this happen. a low pressure system off the coast. that's going to lift its way up the coast on tap of that. we've got cold air and snow moving through portions of iowa stretching up to wisconsin and minnesota. those two systems combine and that is where we're going to see the near blizzard condition working its way up the northeast by late tomorrow, getting you into tuesday. here's your hour-by-hour forecast. you can time this out with the time stamp in the corner.
6:03 pm
snow moving through the midwest monday. getting into early tuesday morning, here i am taking you to very early tuesday morning, you begin to see the moisture moving into the northeast, and could this be very heavy snowfall. with that winds, 50 to 70 miles an hour. this is going to be a big one clearing off for us on wednesday. these are snowfall oaccumulations, you see the pinker colors, two feet of snow, maybe a foot of snow in new york city. the same stretching down to philadelphia. this is a really big system. if you want an idea to give you reference how big they've been in the past. i can take you back. the highest snowfall records ever in new york city. just back in 2016, we had 26". i'm not sure we're going to get there, 18 to two feet of snow spread around the northeast. it's going to be a big one, judge. judge jeanine: thanks, adam. >> we're going to be busy, here a lot the next couple of days.
6:04 pm
judge jeanine: thank you so much. and president trump wants republicans to come together on the party's obamacare replacement. what's keeping some in the gop from getting on board. joining me now republican congressman from new york, chris collins. all right, good evening, congressman. >> good to be with you, jeanine. judge jeanine: good to be with you now, congressman. now, i don't want to get into the weeds here, all i know is this so far. the republicans want to repeal, i think, and replace, although i'm not sure. and then we've got this freedom caucus and then we've got the democrats, and then we've got the guys in the middle, and at the end of the day, what we need is the repeal, and i think replacement. so you've got the replacement ready, right? >> yes, we've been working, i was in a 27-hour markup on wednesday and thursday and that moved forward the replacement
6:05 pm
-- repeal and replace piece that's going to the budget committee and rules will be on the house floor in a little over two weeks and onto the senate, and we're trying to get it on the president's desk before the easter break. there's a lot to be done. judge jeanine: okay, let me ask you this, you have the freedom caucus, and these are the most conservative who don't want any fines, any taxes. they don't want this expanded medicare or i should say medicaid. and, yet, you're going to need them in order to get this thing passed in the house. how do you convince them? is this bowling and pizza working? what do you do? how do you get them on your side? >> well, here's what we know. we need 218 votes. there's 237 house members right now. we're going to get no help from the democrats, so the individuals, their definition of perfect is not necessarily everyone else's definition of perfect.
6:06 pm
this is a good bill, and as i would say a republican from new york and new jersey is not the same as a republican from texas and florida. they've got to understand this. if we don't get this done, i'm not sure what would happen next year, judge, in midterm elections if we don't deliver on the key promise by the president and by all of us who campaigned. our caucus, the freedom caucus as well, have just got to swallow hard and understand perfect can't be the enemy of good. we have to move this over to the senate have. to do it in the next two weeks, and we're counting on them as part of our team to not upset the applecart because we're not going to give them their definition of perfect. it is not going to happen. judge jeanine: this is paul ryan's bill, what does paul ryan do to convince those guys digging their heels in and say look, we got elected as the financially conservative, you know, tax, whatever they are, hawks, how does he convince them? >> well, we've had meeting
6:07 pm
after meeting where he has stood up and said we're on a team. we're in the majority. we're not in the minority anymore, we don't have obama as our president. it's time to understand the american public trusted the republicans with the house, the senate and the white house, and we have to act, you know, in a manner that the public is expecting to get things done and not just to argue about them. so it's going to be a showdown. no two ways about it. judge jeanine: right. >> going to be a showdown and we're counting on freedom caucus members to do the right thing for our party because, again, will be our party come midterm elections if we're going to the polls and didn't deliver on health care or tax reform. judge jeanine: it the argument that the individual mandate and the employer mandate being eliminated, should that be enough to convince them to come to your side? >> yeah, there's no question, judge, all of a sudden now those people that were working part-time jobs at 39 hours that
6:08 pm
got cut to 26 hours can go back to a 39 hour part-time job. companies that want to grow beyond 49 employees to 55, 65 employees, they can now do that without a penaltyy. in the hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars of penalties, taxes and fees, when they're gone, are going to be a jumpstart to our economy. this is what we're trying to do to get the economy moving, create jobs and eliminate the individual mandate and the employer mandate should be enough for our freedom caucus to understand just how good this is. judge jeanine: okay, what kind of horse trading goes on? what do you have to leverage other than a staredown or do the right thing. for some reason, maybe it's the prosecutor in me or the cynicism in me doesn't convince me it's going to do the job. what do you leverage? >> well, i mean, there has been some talk, i don't know that it's going to go anywhere, about the cutoff date on the current expansion plan, instead
6:09 pm
of it being january 1st of 2020, perhaps january 1st of 2019. there's things of that sort. i'm not suggesting that's going to happen. there are tweeks, always a few tweeks, perhaps when does a particular fee or tax roll off? but it's not going to be anything major. the deductible or the refundable tax credits to help the lower income people buy them, we have to have those. some form of expansion has got to move forward, 31 states expanded medicaid. they have to cut the federal piece from 90% to whatever the states normally pay, 50% in new york, 73% in west virginia. judge jeanine: so more deal-making. >> no, there's really not much more we've can do. judge jeanine: gotta go. >> 27 hours on the debate, not one single amendment was passed. judge jeanine: congressman collins, thank you for joining us tonight. >> very good to be with you, judge.
6:10 pm
judge jeanine: to wikileaks and release of internal cia files that detail the agency's ability to hack into your smartphones and smart tvs. joining me now is carrie cordero, former counsel to the u.s. assistant attorney general for national security. all right, carrey, thanks for coming back and joining us here at "justice". now, one of the things that we found out this week was that thousands of documents as described by julian assange's wikileaks, are now apparently available or visible and that we thought were private, and unfortunately, after 2010 and chelsea manning, i think most of us just assume that information within the intelligence community was being protected, and then with snowden, we just assumed everything was being tightened
6:11 pm
up after that in 2013, with the nsa, and i think that you having particular experience in this area, more than most, would understand that this kind of information being available or being, you know, vulnerable to hacking is extremely dangerous to us and needs to be more protected. what is the status of all of this? >> well, thanks for having me on. absolutely. this has been a continual problem, you mentioned this week's release by wikileaks included over 8,000 documents that they purport to include information about very classified and sensitive cia hacking abilities, and it does come on the heels of about 7 years now worth of high-profile, either unauthorized disclosures, leaks or hax of either sensitive or classified information that the government retains. judge jeanine: and why isn't
6:12 pm
the government in a position to protect this information? now, i understand, carrie, if someone walks out the door with information, and we can't figure out who we can, you know, expect to, you know, keep in confidence and who we can't, but when someone from outside the government is able to hack information inside of the government, that's a real problem? >> it is. each of these cases represents a different type of problem. judge jeanine: right. >> so if you look at the 2010 manning case, the 2013 snowden case, and according to at least most recent reports today even in the "wall street journal" regarding the latest cia case, these are potentially insider threat cases. in other words, individuals who have access and who are trusted individuals, in some cases government contractors, who steal that information and facilitate through wikileaks, in this case and in the 2010 case, their public exposure. judge jeanine: well, you know,
6:13 pm
congressman trey gowdy actually said something like it's no more than 30 people that we have to look at in the fbi and the nsa that could be responsible for this, and we wh that we have legally to confront them and get this information from them, but you know, carrie, i want to quickly, before we run out of time, discuss the fact that you know, there was a time when we kind of put an end to a lot of this, but after 9/11, we kind of understood as james comey made so clear, there really isn't privacy anymore, so the tension between privacy and national security isn't as tense as it used to be, and we recognize it we don't have privacy. but now with the reupping of that section 702 of the fisa act, is that in jeopardy because of what wikileaks has done? are americans having to say,
6:14 pm
well, i don't want to reup this now. we're in too much danger? >> we have expectation of privacy. fisa section 702, the foreign intelligence surveillance act is a legal authority that's been in place since 2008. set to expire at the end of the year, congress is having legislative debate whether to reauthorize it. on one hand, multiple senior national security officials of both parties said it's a productive and important legal authority. on the other hand, this issue of the security of information really is one that the government has to address if they're going to retain sensitive information, they have to have ability to protect it. judge jeanine: do you think we'll ever get there, carrie? >> certainly a lot of work that can be done between the government and private sector to improve information, both the government and private sector have insider threat programs but the government has to be able to assure the american public if it's going to collect sensitive information that it has the ability to protect it. judge jeanine: okay, carrie cordero, thank you for joining us again.
6:15 pm
>> thanks. >> lots of questions whether russia had any involvement in this presidential election. does, though, the united states meddle in other countries' elections? joining me is retired cia operations officer, chief of station sam fadis. sam, i got sick and tired of hearing you know russia is undermining our democracy and meddling in our election. so i said to myself, self, have we ever done anything like this, and as someone involved in covert operations himself, sam, we have meddled in other countries' elections? >> without question. it's covert action, pursuant to a finding from the president, absolutely. judge jeanine: all right, and i understand in my research that there are something like, i don't know, i think it was well over 100 times in the last 60 years, does that sound about right to you?
6:16 pm
>> sounds low to me, but i'll go with that number. judge jeanine: sounds low? all right, let's talk about the fact we have involved ourselves in other countries's elections, without getting into people and glass houses shouldn't throw stones. how would we do that? >> well, it's a form of covert action pursuant to authority from the president of the united states. you could do it in a million ways. you could pay people. you could hack databases. you could threaten action if people don't do what we want them to. there's an endless series of techniques we could use. judge jeanine: let me ask or posit a hypothetical question as it relates to russia and undermining our democracy. if you were to analyze based on experience and covert operations and actually running large-scale covert ops in this exact kind of thing, would you say sitting opposite a russian ambassador in, you know, in
6:17 pm
open daylight or e-mails going into a building from russia are an example of the russian government covert operation and trying to undermine an election? is that how it's done? >> no, that's not how it's done. that's nonsensical suggestion and i think that's probably evidence that there isn't anything untoward going on, and, you know, let's be clear, the russians are masters at this kind of thing. they know exactly what they're doing, and no, it would be done in the dead of night, and you wouldn't see any evidence of it. it would not happen in the middle of a senate office building in broad daylight. judge jeanine: so all of this -- i mean, so you and other people like you in the cia who have done these covert ops, i mean, you're sitting at home laughing at the claims that russia interfered with the election because you know how they do this? >> right. i have seen absolutely nothing
6:18 pm
of which i'm aware, that suggests that there was any russian effort that manipulated this election. that they stole data? that's one thing. judge jeanine: all right, let me ask you, give me examples of when and how the united states specifics has interfered with certain elections in other countries? >> i'm going to give you a couple of examples and they're going to of necessity be dated for obvious reasons. judge jeanine: right. >> but we staged a coup in guatemala a number of decades ago where we overthrew the government of guatemala. we replaced the elected government of iran with the shah in 1953. we have done this and literally deposed leaders and replaced them with people who would do what we wanted them to. judge jeanine: and as recently as a couple of years ago, there's reports that state department money went into israel and the obama administration to work against
6:19 pm
a prime minister netanyahu in his election. >> right. in recent years there's been a whole bunch of state department programs where they fund ngo's in a lot of places. israel as you noted, egypt with the express purpose of influencing the government, the election, who forms the government. judge jeanine: interesting, but shock, shock, that we would do something like this. sam, thank you for your service and thanks for being on "justice" with us tonight. >> thank you. judge jeanine: all right, and house intelligence giving the president a monday deadline for proof of wiretapping. will he explain his bombshell allegations? my political panel on deck for a lively debate next. plus, did you miss my open last night? shame on you! but you're in luck! we'll give you a second look. and what if someone wiretapped you? >> what if someone is wiretapping your phone. >> of course, we don't know what you're saying, you would
6:20 pm
never confess. tell us the horrible things people have said to you on your phone. >> on my phone? >> yeah. judge jeanine: justice is always served up best on the street. this is one you can't miss. we'll roll on in a moment. safe drivers who switch to esurance could save money on car insurance. in fact, safe drivers who switch from geico to esurance could save hundreds. so if you switch to esurance, saving is a pretty safe bet. auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance. an allstate company. click or call. great sleep. we engineered every inch of the casper mattress to make it possible. a subtle bounce, just the right sink, we even designed a unique foam that's breathable for all night coolness.
6:21 pm
6:22 pm
various: (shouting) heigh! ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here.
6:24 pm
. judge jeanine: welcome back to "justice". let's bring in our political panel, former deputy assistant to president george w. bush fred blakeman and fox news contributor dennis kucinich. good evening, gentlemen. >> good evening. >> good evening. judge jeanine: i want to start -- well, good evening. i want to start with pretty much where i was talking to carrie cordero who worked in the nsa, and i'm fascinated by congressman kucinich's statement that when he was a congressman, as an american citizen, obviously, he had a conversation with someone from libya. his conversation was wiretapped and not only was it wiretapped, but a newspaper ended up having it and played it for him several years later, and he
6:25 pm
never found out how they got it. of course, they don't have to say what their source is, and never found out how that happened. tell us about that, congressman. >> you're account is correct. i was in my congressional office in a phone call by the libyan leader, the phone call was approved by general house counsel. i was asking questions, two years after i left office, i was informed by the washington times they had a tape they wanted to listen to. a taped conversation which was given to them by i concluded by an intelligence agency. judge jeanine: but they had no right to do that. >> they don't. before i left office, i want to show you and your viewers office. before i left office i submitted a series of freedom of information requests to intelligence agencies. judge jeanine: oh, my god. >> a number came back, a number did not.
6:26 pm
five years later i'm waiting for answer for foia request. judge jeanine: what does the ordinary person do with the freedom of information, reminds me of hillary clinton state department when they asked for information, they kept saying we have nothing, we have nothing. it flies in the face of everything we're supposed to do and freedom of information. but it not only is illegal, but that they leaked it is even more illegal, and that's what is so disconcerting about this. >> exactly right. it was the tap which was first a violation of separation of powers, but then the leaking of it was intended, i think, to try to influence government policy. now let me just tell you something else. judge jeanine: yep, yep. >> very much concerning. judge jeanine: we've got to move it. >> if they can do this to a member of congress, and the cia hacked into the senate intelligence committee's computers and admitted it, if
6:27 pm
they can do it to members of congress, they're doing to the private citizen. judge jeanine: they're doing it to everyone. so brad, you say wikileaks is a cancer on american intelligence's safety. my concern is, as i spoke to carrie cordero is shame on us that number one, that they can hack into, it and shame on us again that we can't identify who in intelligence is leaking this crap out. >> there is no doubt about it. but, look, i think what happened to the congressman is systemic to the problem that we're having in america today. we have 17 separate and distinct intelligence services. >> well, obama did that right before he left. >> right, they're in competition with each other. not only that, they withhold information, they leak, they point fingers when one is caught. i happen to think that donald trump should ask for complete audit by the executive branch and lead the way in cleaning this up. judge, it is imperative that if others can get the information
6:28 pm
third parties, contractors need to be scrutinized as why we have independent contractors who are protecting america's vital secrets. audit is needed, determination of what intelligence services are needed, pare it back and get control over our guarded secrets. judge jeanine: when you think about it, chelsea manning, snowden, julian assange, how many times do we have to convince ourselves it's not tight enough, and, you know, dennis, one of the things that brad says is wikileaks never releases materials on the russians and chinese. what does that mean? >> i'm not sure what it means. judge jeanine: what does it mean, brad? >> i'll tell you what it means is we are targets, and i happen to believe that there are forces behind wikileaks that are adversaries to the united states and has wikileaks doing dirty work for them. why is it so easy to get american intelligence and not
6:29 pm
easy to get russian or north korean or chinese intelligence. judge jeanine: we are in terms of securing their intelligence. what do you think, dennis? >> judge, i'll tell you where i come in on all of this. our constitution success shredded. no american is safe from the government right now which because of the patriot act can reach into individual's private conversations under section 702 of fisa, anybody can be vulnerable to claims that they're doing improper business with foreign agents. this is wrong. we have to regain our basic freedoms which are under attack by our own government. judge jeanine: you know what? even jim comey said there is no privacy anymore, i'm not sure going after 702 of the fisa is the way to resolve this problem. brad, do you have -- before we go, on the reupping of 702?
6:30 pm
>> right now we let the inmates run the asylum, the executive branch how intelligence is given out, created and by whom it's being worked upon, and unless we get a handle on that, shame on us. we should never surrender our rights and say this is the new normal. it should never be the new normal. judge jeanine: i agree. brad and dennis, thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you. judge jeanine: and second look at my opening statement up next. stay with us. yeah, then how'd i get this... ...allstate safe driving bonus check? ...only allstate sends you a bonus check for every six months you're accident free. silence. it's good to be in, good hands. a body without proper footd needssupport can mean pain. the dr. scholl's kiosk maps your feet and recommends our custom fit orthotic to stabilize your foundation and relieve foot, knee or lower back pain from being on your feet. dr. scholl's. and i finally found our big idaho potato truck. it's been touring the country telling folks about
6:31 pm
our heart healthy idaho potatoes, america's favorite potatoes, and donating to local charities along the way. but now it's finally back home where it belongs. aw man. hey, wait up. where you goin'? here we go again. more "doing chores for dad" per roll more "earning something you love" per roll bounty is more absorbent, so the roll can last 50% longer than the leading ordinary brand. so you get more "life" per roll. bounty, the quicker picker upper
6:33 pm
how's tcheck it out.t going? lights. meeting configuration. blueprints. call hruska. we've gotta set up a meeting. sure. how do you spell that? abreu, albert, allen, anderson c, anderson r... you know what? i'll just tell him myself. door. andrade... see why 3,000 companies a month are switching to vonage. with e*trade's powerful trading tools, right at your fingertips,
6:34 pm
you have access to in-depth analysis, level 2 data, and a team of experienced traders ready to help you if you need it. ♪ ♪ it's like having the power of a trading floor, wherever you are. it's your trade. ♪ ♪ e*trade. ♪ ♪ start trading today at etrade.com . >> live from america's headquarters i'm kelly wright. coastal regions in the northeast under a blizzard watch. anywhere from 12 to 18" of snow is being predicted in some places. forecasters warning there could be more as winds could reach up to 50 miles per hour or more. it's supposed to begin tomorrow night and last into most of tuesday. if you plan to travel this week, you might want to rethink those plans.
6:35 pm
many airlines already waiving fees for changes to reservations on tuesday and wednesday. a senior official with the u.s.-led coalition says the isis held city of mosul is completely surrounded. isis held the city captive for more than two years. forces are losing 60% of the ground it once held in iraq. i'm kelly wright. now back to "justice with judge jeanine" . judge jeanine: president trump wants his own u.s. attorneys in place, but not everyone is going willingly. here's another look at my opening statement from last night. so, 46 united states attorneys have been asked by the newly elected president of the united states to tender their resignations. so what! that's what i said. so what! but to hear it from the left,
6:36 pm
you would think this is just another affront to democracy and our way of life, by the trump administration. in fact, i'm surprised they didn't throw in the russians. let me give it to you straight. this is a nonstory. it is not unusual for any new administration to seek the dismissal of political appointees, especially when a new party comes in. united states attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. in 1993, bill clinton's administration sought the resignation of all sitting united states attorneys appointed by republican president george bush, in one fell swoop. the obama administration also replaced all united states attorneys but what, from the bush 43 administration. now, for those of you who might be new to politics, a quote
6:37 pm
from president barack obama. elections have consequences. or you might be more familiar with the old adage to the victor belong the spoils. but why go quietly and with dignity when you can create chaos? the united states attorney from new york's southern district without a doubt the premiere district in the nation, digs in his heels and refuses to resign. absurdly claiming he won't resign, and insisting the president fire him. say what? do you really think you have a claim to this office? take a listen to november 30th when he rushed to the cameras at trump tower. >> president-elect asked presumably because as a new yorker and aware of the great
6:38 pm
work our office has done over the last seven years, asked me to discuss whether i'd be prepared to stay on as united states attorney, independently, we had a good meeting, i said i would absolutely consider staying on. judge jeanine: folks, what are the operative words? the president asked if he'd be prepared to stay on, not please stay on, and his response was he would consider it. now he then goes onto say he was asked to stay on and he agreed, but we really don't know what was said. that's his version, not the trump team's, and now when 47 have already automatically stepped aside because they know the protocol, the remaining 46 are asked to tender their resignations. the horror comes out, refuses
6:39 pm
to resign and can't believe that this would apply to him and says donald trump will have to fire him, as if he's got a hold on that office, and preet, men bigger than you, gentlemen, have left when new administrations came in, giants like whitney seymour, robert fiske, rudy giuliani, james comey, david kelley, so since this happens all the time, what's the fuss? all day the trump haters claimed any change interrupts ongoing investigations of prosecutions and ultimately jeopardizes lady justice. that especially in offices where public corruption cases are tried, justice is at stake. as if only one man carries a whole office.
6:40 pm
cut it out! do you really think that this is the first time in the history of this country that a prosecutor, federal, state, local, town, village, hamlet has been replaced by another one? what the hell do we do when they die? just give up? here's my question: no one but preet ba hara used the word fire, or asked for resignations. who knows? maybe some would have been asked to stay on, and just moments before we came on air ifound two were, even the they tendered their resignations, but because preet has such a huge ego, he thinks he's so all-important he couldn't believe such a request could possibly apply to him, he ramped it up and dared the
6:41 pm
president of the united states to fire him. so what do you think happened? lady justice is winking under her bandages, and donald trump did what only donald trump can do so well. he said, "you're fired!" . up next, married priests? pope francis is considering it. where's the car? it'll be here in three...uh, four minutes. are you kidding me? no, looks like he took a wrong turn. don't worry, this guy's got like a four-star rating, we're good. his name is randy. that's like one of the most trustworthy names! ordering a getaway car with an app? are you randy? that's me! awesome! surprising. what's not surprising? how much money erin saved by switching to geico. everybody comfortable with the air temp? i could go a little cooler. ok. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more.
6:42 pm
it can seem like triggers pop up everywhere. luckily there's powerful, 24-hour, non-drowsy claritin. it provides relief of symptoms that can be triggered by over 200 different allergens. live claritin clear. hei don't want one that's haded a big wreck just say, show me cars with no accidents reported find the cars you want, avoid the ones you don't plus you get a free carfax® report with every listing i like it start your used car search at carfax.com you wto progress.move. to not just accept what you see, but imagine something new. at invisalign®, we use the most advanced teeth straightening technology to help you find the next amazing version of yourself. it's time to unleash your secret weapon. it's there, right under your nose. get to your best smile up to 50% faster. visit invisalign.com to get started today.
6:43 pm
you may know what it's like to deal with high... and low blood sugar. januvia (sitagliptin) is a once-daily pill that, along with diet and exercise, helps lower blood sugar. januvia works when your blood sugar is high and works less when your blood sugar is low, because it works by enhancing your body's own ability to lower blood sugar. plus januvia, by itself, is not likely to cause weight gain or low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). januvia should not be used in patients with type 1 diabetes
6:44 pm
or diabetic ketoacidosis. tell your doctor if you have a history of pancreatitis. serious side effects can happen, including pancreatitis which may be severe and lead to death. stop taking januvia and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area which may be pancreatitis. tell your doctor right away and stop taking januvia if you have an allergic reaction that causes swelling of the face, lips, tongue, or throat, or affects your breathing or causes rash or hives. kidney problems sometimes requiring dialysis have been reported. some people may develop severe joint pain. call your doctor if this happens. using januvia with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. to reduce the risk, your doctor may prescribe a lower dose of the sulfonylurea or insulin. your doctor may do blood tests before and during treatment to check your kidneys. if you have kidney problems a lower dose may be prescribed. side effects may include upper respiratory tract infection, stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, and headache. for help lowering your blood sugar talk to your doctor about januvia.
6:45 pm
so how old do you want uhh, i was thinking around 70. alright, and before that? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? oh yeah sure... ok, like what? but i thought we were supposed to be talking about investing for retirement? we're absolutely doing that. but there's no law you can't make the most of today. what do you want to do? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. yea. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change. investment management services from td ameritrade. . judge jeanine: a shortage of priests has been a problem for the catholic church for sometime now. pope francis is open to the idea of letting married men become priests.
6:46 pm
joining me to discuss is father gerald murray. father, good to have you back on "justice". now, i have to tell you, i'm catholic, went to catholic schools, the whole thing, when i heard this, i was flabbergasted! i didn't call my mother, i know how she must feel. does the pope have the right to change this? >> he does, if he wants to. judge jeanine: why? where did this come from? >> the idea has been around for a several decades. there was a lot of pressure to get rid of priestly celibacy and part of modernizing in the church that was rejected by pope paul vi, pope francis and pope benedict. it is not where we want to go. judge jeanine: you don't support it? >> not at all, i like what we have now. judge jeanine: i have to tell you with, all due respect, father, if i'm a priest and i practice celibacy for all those years and this guys comes in, got a wife, kids, married.
6:47 pm
why did i do this all these years? >> some might say that, i'm happy the way i am, i'm happy being a priest and don't mind not having a wife and kids, i don't think you want to upset the people of god, the church in general by saying what we valued for 1,000 plus years is going to be cast aside. shortage of priests has to do with the lack of religious practice, not the fact that priests can't be married. we have to increase religious practice, get people praying, go to church, all that good stuff. that's how you solve the problem. judge jeanine: what it would take for the church to finally say, by the way, i'm reading about this and it says that already there are as many as 100 catholic priests in the united states that are married. who said they could be married? >> well, the pope, pope john paul ii made an exception for episcopalian ministers who were married and wanted to be catholic priests. judge jeanine: why? >> because they wanted to respect the fact they were serving the episcopalian church
6:48 pm
as a minister and want to serve as the catholic church as a priest. judge jeanine: why didn't they stay episcopalian. >> they believe the catholic church is a true church and wanted to be part of it. judge jeanine: how long did it take? >> i'm not going to question, i'm glad they converted. we have married priests in ukraine and lebanon, places where married priests are. judge jeanine: certainly greek orthodox, i have an uncle who is greek orthodox. >> it's a fruitful and good thing. remember, christ wasn't married. judge jeanine: where did this start? >> started with jesus, jesus praised those who represent the kingdom. the most effective way is representing all ways of life, teaching, way of living and the fact we don't have a wife. we're totally at the disposition much the church. judge jeanine: you know where it goes from here? >> tell me. judge jeanine: i'm going to tell you. if married men can become priests, then you have the
6:49 pm
wivis and was reading that some of them actually counsel couples together, the wife, then you have gay priests. then you're going to have women priests. equal rights, right? where is the catholic church going? >> put it at this, i'm not a supporter of changing this rule. the celibate clergy is one of the glories to the whole world. this allowed us to preach the gospel not worrying what kids are doing back at home. this is where we should stay. judge jeanine: thank you for joining us father murray. is it street justice?nt to miss. i'm telling you. ♪
6:50 pm
why do we put so much effort into engineering the can-am defender? well, why do you put so much effort at everything you do? because a job worth doing, is worth doing right. can-am defender. tough, capable, clever. get a 3-year brp limited warranty plus a $1,500 cash rebate on 2016 defender models. visit your local dealer for details.
6:53 pm
. judge jeanine: if you're phone was tapped, what's the worst thing they'd hear? time to hit the streets for some street justice. >> what if someone was listening to you on a wiretap. what's the worst thing you said to somebody? >> talking to my fiance sexually. >> would you be mortified? >> no. >> truth and honesty. good luck. they're listening to you on
6:54 pm
your telephone. what's the worst thing that someone said to you that you are horrified if it got out? >> listen to me on my phone? >> yes. >> i'm not sure. >> yes, you are, you just don't want to say it! >> on my phone! >> yeah. >> what's the worst thing someone said to you on the phone because you know they're listening and it could be played at any time? >> vote for hillary. judge jeanine: that's the worst thing you said on the phone. >> yeah. judge jeanine: if all our phones are being tapped, what would be the most embarrassing thing. >> i can't think. judge jeanine: that bad? >> was it fun? at the time yes. [ laughter ] >> okay. do you want to tell us its name? tell me. >> please! [laughter]. judge jeanine: what was the worst thing someone said to you. >> watch where you going. judge jeanine: that's it?
6:55 pm
hey, you get to get some excitement in your life. what's the worst thing someone said to you on the phone in the last week? >> they know better. judge jeanine: they know better? how tall are you? >> 6'2 1/2. judge jeanine: what was the worst thing someone said on the phone. >> i can't tell you that. judge jeanine: did they threaten you? >> no, no, no. judge jeanine: do you call the cops? >> no. judge jeanine: did you marry her? >> yes. judge jeanine: do you think the russians are listen? >> all the time. judge jeanine: you think the cia is listening? >> maybe. judge jeanine: okay. >> are you cia? judge jeanine: i could be but not in this life. >> are you wireed? . judge jeanine: damn right i'm wired. what do you think of "justice with judge jeanine"?
6:56 pm
6:57 pm
6:58 pm
various: (shouting) heigh! ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here. termites, feasting on homes twenty-four-seven. we're on the move. roger. hey rick, all good?
6:59 pm
7:00 pm
get ready for an all new face big broadcast that premieres april 7 at 9:00 p.m. on the big fox. friend me on facebook, follow me on twitter an instagram. see you next saturday night. >> i'm chris wallace. president trump continues his offensive on healthcare. >> action on obamacare is an urgent necessity. >> we will discuss the prospects for repeal and replace. the president's first report card on jobs and his plan for tax reform. with gary, white house chief economic adviser, first sun show interview. then conservative republicans are pushing back on the party's healthcare plan. the. >> the goal is real simple. get rid of this terrible law and do what we told voters what we were going to do.
103 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on