judge jeanine: welcome to a special sunday edition ofus "justice." i'm judge jeanine pirro. a big blizzard is setting its reporter: this is a big one and weol are targeting the northeas, a large area fromv up to portions of maine.

not you pink color is a warning which means a little bit more severe. then i can take you a little bit tighter. alll of this green is a blizzard watch. very heavy snow, very strong winds. that's something we are looking forward to coming late tuesday, really monday night into tuesday. here is what it looks like on our satellite-radar. two systems will come together to make this happen. it doesn't look like a lot now. that will lift its way up the coast. we haveay cold air and snow movg through portions of iowa up into wisconsin and minnesota. those two systems will combine and that's where we'll see the near blizzard conditions working its wayay up the northeast gettg into tuesday. you can time this out with snow moving through the midwest monday. monday night getting into early

tuesday morning. early tuesday morning you begin to see moisture moving into the northeast, and this could be heavy snowfall. with thathe wind, 50-70 miles an hour. this will and big one clearing off for us wednesday. these are snowfall accumulations. you see the pinker colors. that's getting up to two feet of snow. stretching down to philadelphia. this is a real big system if you wantsa an idea to give you some reference of how big they have went in past. t these are the highest snowfall records ever in new york city. in 2016 we had 26 inches. 18 to 2 feet of snow spread across the northeast. it will be a big one. we'll be busy the next couple days.lo judge jeanine: thanks so much.

president trump wants republicans too come together on the party's obamacare replacement. what's keeping some in the gop from getting on board. republican congressman from new york, chris collins. good evening, congressman. ie don't want to get into the weeds here.sm all i know is this so far. the republicans want to repeal i thinkk and replace, though i'm not sure. then wee have this freedom caucus, then we have the democrats, and then we have got the guys in the middle. at the end of the day what we need the repeal and i think replacement. so you have got the replacement ready, right? >> i was in a 2-hour markup wednesday and thursday. and that moved forward the replacement,t repeal and replace

piece that's going to our budget committee.it a little over two weeks and on to the senate. we areth trying to get it on the president's desk before the easter break. judge jeanine: the freedom caucus, these are the most conservative who don't want any fines, any tax, they don't want an expanded medicaid, and yet you are going to need them in order to get this thing passed in the house. how do you convince them. is this bowling and pizza working? how do you get them on your side? >> we need 218 votes. there are 237 house members right now. we'll get no help from the democrats. so the individuals, their definition of perfect is not necessarilydu everyone else's definition of perfect. this is a good bill. as it. would say, a republican

from new york and new jersey is not the same as a republican from texas and florida. if we don't get this done, i'm not surean what would happen net year in our mid-term elections if we don't deliver on this key promise by the president and by all of house campaigned. so our caucus, the freedom caucus as well have got to swallow hard and understand perfect can't be the enemy of good.d we have to move this over to the senate in the next two weeks and we are counting on them as part of our team, to not upset this apple cart. we are not going to give them their definition of perfect. it's just not going to happen. judge jeanine: thisto is paul ryan's bill. what does paul ryan do to convince those guys who are digging their heels in saying we gotth elected as financial conservative hawks. how doess he convince them? > we had meeting after meetig where he stood up and said we

are on a team, we are in the majority. we are not in the minority. it's time to understand the american public has trusted the republicans with the house, the senate and the white house. and we have to act in a manner that the public is expecting to done and not just to argue about them. so it will be a showdown. there is no two ways about it. there is going to be a showdown and we are counting on our freedom caucus members to do the right thing for our party. we bebeau be party. judge jeanine:e should the mandate be enough to convince them to come to your sign fit' eliminated? >> those people working part-time jobs with 29 hours. they got cut to 26 hours.

they can go back to a 29 part-time job. companies who want to grow to 25, 26 employees, they can do that t without penalties. when the fees are gone, it will be a jump-start to our economy. this isno what we are trying too to get the economy moving. the individual mandate and the employer mandate should be enough for our freedom caucus to understand how good this is. judge jeanine: what do you have to learning other than a stare-down. what do you learning? >> there have -- what do you leverage? >> there has been some talk about the cutoff date on the current expansion plan. a instead of january 1 of 2020, perhaps it could be january 1 of

2019. there are things of that sort. i'm not suggesting it's going to happen. but there are always a few tweaks. when does a does a particular tax roll off. but it won't be anything major. the deductible or the refundable tax credits that help the lower income people buy in, we have o have those. some form of expansion has to move forward. they will have to cut it down to what the states normally pay. judge jeanine: more deal making. >>in there is not much more we n do. not one single amendment in 27 hours on the bill. judge jeanine: now to wikileaks of internal cia

files. it shows the agency's ability to hack into your smart phones and tvs. terry, thanks for coming back and joining us here at justice. one of the b things that we foud out this week was that thousands of documents as described by julianan assange's wikileaks are apparently available or visible that we thought were private. after 2010 and chelsea manning, most us just assumed information weren't intelligence community being protected. then with snowden, we just assumed everything was being tightened up after that in 2013 with the nsa.

and i think that you having particular experience in this area more than most would understand that this kind of information being available, being vulnerable to hacking, is extremely dangerous to us, and needs to be more protected. what is the status of all of this? >> this has been a continual problem. you mentioned this week's release by wikileaks included 8,000 documentss they purport to include information about very classified and sensitive cia hack abilities. and it comes on the heels of 7 years now worth of high-profile unauthorized disclosures, leaks or hacks either sensitive or classified information that the government retains. judge jeanine: why isn't the

government in a position to protect this information? i understand if someone walks out the door with information and we can't figure out who we can expect to keep confidence and who we can't. but when someone from outside the government is able to hack information from inside the government, that's a real problem.th >> eachle of these cases represents a different type of problem. if you look at the 2013 manning case and the snowden case and the late thest cia case, these are potentially insider threat issues. individuals who have access and who are trusted individuals in some cases government contractors who steal that information and facilitate through ws -- through wikileaks their public exposure. judge jeanine: congressman trey

gowdy said it's no more than 30 people weik have to look at in e f.b.i. and nsa that could be responsible for this and we have to look at whatever powers we have legally to confront them and get this information from them.ro i want to quickly before we run out of time discuss the fact was a time when we kind of put an end to a lot of this. after 9/11 we understood there isn't any privacy anymore. sow that tension between privacy and national securityiv isn't as used to be. and we recognize we don't have privacy. but now with the re-upping of the section 72 of the fisa act, is that more in jeopardy because of what wikileaks has done? are americans going to say i don't want to re-up this now? we are in too much danger. >> we do have an expectation of

privacy. theha fisa section 72 is a legal authority that's been in place sincece 2008. it's set to expire the end of this year. congress isse having a legislate debate on whether to reauthorize it.re senior national security officials from to bothti parties say it's pane important and productive legal authority. the issue of the security of information is one thean government has to address. if they are going reef taken sensitive information, they need the ability to reflect it. judge jeanine: do you think we'll ever get there? >>be there is work to be done to protect information.on but the government has to be able to assure the american public that if it's going to collect sensitive information, that it has the ability to protect it. judge jeanine: lots of questions

about whether russia has any involvement in this presidential election. does the unitedl states meddlen other country's elections? joining me retired cia operations officer, sam fannis. i got tired of hearing that russia is meddling in you election. i said to myself, self, have we ever done anything like this? have we ever meddled in other country's elections? >> without question it's covert action pursuant to a finding from the president, absolutely. judge jeanine: i understand in my research there is something like, i don't know, well over 100 times in 60 years. does that sound right to you? >> sounds low to me, but i'll go with that number.

judge jeanine: let's talk about the fact we have involved in other country's elections. how would we do that? >> it's a form covert action. you have to do it pursuant to authority from the president of the united states.rt could do it in a million ways. you could pay people, you could hack data bases. you couldld threaten action if people don't do what we want them to. there is an endless series of techniquesop we could use. judge jeanine: let me posit a hypothetical question about russia undermining our democracy. if you are running large-scale covert ops would you say sitting opposite a russian ambassador in open daylight or emails going

into a building from russia are an example of the russian government covert operation in undermine an election? is that how it's done? >> no, that's not how it's done. it's a nonsensical suggestion. and i think that's evidence there isn'tha anything untoward going on. the russians are massers at this kinds of -- are masters at this kinds of thing. it would be done in the dead of night and you wouldn't see any evidence of it. fit wouldn't happen in the middle of a senate office building in broad daylight. judge jeanine: you and other people like you in the cia who have done covert ops, you are sitting at home laughing at all these claims russia first interstate feared with the election because they know how they do this? >> right. i have seen absolutely nothing of which i'm aware that suggests there was any russian effort

that manipulated this election. that they stole data, that's one thing. judge jeanine: give me examples of when and how the united states, specifics, has interfered with certain elections in other countries. >> i will give you a couple examples and they will be dated or obvious reasons. we staged a coups in guatemala where we overthrew the government god -- the government of guatemala. we overthrew the shaw of iran. judge jeanine: there are reports state department money went into israel in the obama administration to work against a prime minister netanyahu in his election.

>> in recent years there have been>> a whole bunch of state department programs where they funds ngos with the express purpose of influencing the government, the election, who forms the government. judge jeanine: interesting. but shock, shock, that we could do something like this. shaw for your service and thank you for being on "justice with judge jeanine" tonight. house intelligencenk giving the president a monday deadline for proof of wiretapping. will he explain his bombshell. >> gaightss? did you miss my open last night? shame on you. but you are in luck. we'll give you a second look. what if someone wiretaps you? >> of course we don't want to know what you are saying. but tell us>> the horrible thins people have said to you on your

phone. >> onng my phone? judge jeanine: justice is always served up best on the streets. this one you can't miss. suppositories for relief in minutes. and dulcoease for comfortable relief of hard stools. dulcolax. designed for dependable relief.

. judge jeanine: welcome back to "justice". let's bring in our political panel, former deputy assistant to president george w. bush fred blakeman and fox news contributor dennis kucinich. good evening, gentlemen. >> good evening. >> good evening. judge jeanine: i want to start -- well, good evening. i want to start with pretty much where i was talking to carrie cordero who worked in the nsa, and i'm fascinated by congressman kucinich's statement that when he was a congressman, as an american citizen, obviously, he had a conversation with someone from libya. his conversation was wiretapped and not only was it wiretapped, but a newspaper ended up having it and played it for him several years later, and he

never found out how they got it. of course, they don't have to say what their source is, and never found out how that happened. tell us about that, congressman. >> you're account is correct. i was in my congressional office in a phone call by the libyan leader, the phone call was approved by general house counsel. i was asking questions, two years after i left office, i was informed by the washington times they had a tape they wanted to listen to. a taped conversation which was given to them by i concluded by an intelligence agency. judge jeanine: but they had no right to do that. >> they don't. before i left office, i want to show you and your viewers office. before i left office i submitted a series of freedom of information requests to intelligence agencies. judge jeanine: oh, my god. >> a number came back, a number did not. five years later i'm waiting

for answer for foia request. judge jeanine: what does the ordinary person do with the freedom of information, reminds me of hillary clinton state department when they asked for information, they kept saying we have nothing, we have nothing. it flies in the face of everything we're supposed to do and freedom of information. but it not only is illegal, but that they leaked it is even more illegal, and that's what is so disconcerting about this. >> exactly right. it was the tap which was first a violation of separation of powers, but then the leaking of it was intended, i think, to try to influence government policy. now let me just tell you something else. judge jeanine: yep, yep. >> very much concerning. judge jeanine: we've got to move it. >> if they can do this to a member of congress, and the cia hacked into the senate intelligence committee's computers and admitted it, if they can do it to members of

congress, they're doing to the private citizen. judge jeanine: they're doing it to everyone. so brad, you say wikileaks is a cancer on american intelligence's safety. my concern is, as i spoke to carrie cordero is shame on us that number one, that they can hack into, it and shame on us again that we can't identify who in intelligence is leaking this crap out. >> there is no doubt about it. but, look, i think what happened to the congressman is systemic to the problem that we're having in america today. we have 17 separate and distinct intelligence services. >> well, obama did that right before he left. >> right, they're in competition with each other. not only that, they withhold information, they leak, they point fingers when one is caught. i happen to think that donald trump should ask for complete audit by the executive branch and lead the way in cleaning this up. judge, it is imperative that if others can get the information

third parties, contractors need to be scrutinized as why we have independent contractors who are protecting america's vital secrets. audit is needed, determination of what intelligence services are needed, pare it back and get control over our guarded secrets. judge jeanine: when you think about it, chelsea manning, snowden, julian assange, how many times do we have to convince ourselves it's not tight enough, and, you know, dennis, one of the things that brad says is wikileaks never releases materials on the russians and chinese. what does that mean? >> i'm not sure what it means. judge jeanine: what does it mean, brad? >> i'll tell you what it means is we are targets, and i happen to believe that there are forces behind wikileaks that are adversaries to the united states and has wikileaks doing dirty work for them. why is it so easy to get american intelligence and not

easy to get russian or north korean or chinese intelligence. judge jeanine: we are in terms of securing their intelligence. what do you think, dennis? >> judge, i'll tell you where i come in on all of this. our constitution success shredded. no american is safe from the government right now which because of the patriot act can reach into individual's private conversations under section 702 of fisa, anybody can be vulnerable to claims that they're doing improper business with foreign agents. this is wrong. we have to regain our basic freedoms which are under attack by our own government. judge jeanine: you know what? even jim comey said there is no privacy anymore, i'm not sure going after 702 of the fisa is the way to resolve this problem. brad, do you have -- before we go, on the reupping of 702? >> right now we let the inmates

run the asylum, the executive branch how intelligence is given out, created and by whom it's being worked upon, and unless we get a handle on that, shame on us. we should never surrender our rights and say this is the new normal. it should never be the new normal. judge jeanine: i agree. brad and dennis, thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you. judge jeanine: and second look at my opening statement up at my opening statement up ne with e*trade's powerful trading tools, right at your fingertips, you have access to in-depth analysis, level 2 data, and a team of experienced traders ready to help you if you need it. ♪ ♪ it's like having the power of a trading floor, wherever you are. it's your trade. ♪ ♪ e*trade. ♪ ♪ start trading today at etrade.com crazy. [ chuckles ] [ male announcer ] you get it all started... you bring them all together...

[ chatter ] ...and sometimes cart them around, too. and when it comes to making custom t-shirts that make the event, you do it all with customink. with the best collection of styles and graphics to choose from, it's easy to go online and create custom t-shirts and more for all of life's events. free shipping and on-time delivery is guaranteed. go to customink.com to get started today.

♪ she'll unease you ♪ all the better just to please you ♪

♪ she's precocious, and she knows just ♪ ♪ what it takes to make a pro blush ♪ ♪ all the boys think she's a spy, ♪ ♪ she's got bette davis eyes kelly: i'm kelly wright in washington with an extreme weather alert. weather is threatening to pack quite a punch across the northeast this week. it may well bed the season's biggest snowstorm. its estimated time of arrival is monday night. it will continue with heavy winds and blizzard-like conditions. it's likely to stretch from d.c. to new england. some areas may see as much as 2 feet of snow and coastal

flooding. in syria the terrible bloodshed is only getting worse for the nation's children. 650 children were killed last year, making 2016 the worst years yet for syria's young. unicef says they aren't safe for children because they frequently come under attack. i'm kelly wright. . judge jeanine: president trump wants his own u.s. attorneys in place, but not everyone is going willingly. here's another look at my opening statement from last night. so, 46 united states attorneys have been asked by the newly elected president of the united states to tender their resignations. so what! that's what i said. so what! but to hear it from the left, you would think this is just

another affront to democracy and our way of life, by the trump administration. in fact, i'm surprised they didn't throw in the russians. let me give it to you straight. this is a nonstory. it is not unusual for any new administration to seek the dismissal of political appointees, especially when a new party comes in. united states attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. in 1993, bill clinton's administration sought the resignation of all sitting united states attorneys appointed by republican president george bush, in one fell swoop. the obama administration also replaced all united states attorneys but what, from the bush 43 administration. now, for those of you who might be new to politics, a quote

from president barack obama. elections have consequences. or you might be more familiar with the old adage to the victor belong the spoils. but why go quietly and with dignity when you can create chaos? the united states attorney from new york's southern district without a doubt the premiere district in the nation, digs in his heels and refuses to resign. absurdly claiming he won't resign, and insisting the president fire him. say what? do you really think you have a claim to this office? take a listen to november 30th when he rushed to the cameras at trump tower. >> president-elect asked presumably because as a new yorker and aware of the great

work our office has done over the last seven years, asked me to discuss whether i'd be prepared to stay on as united states attorney, independently, we had a good meeting, i said i would absolutely consider staying on. judge jeanine: folks, what are the operative words? the president asked if he'd be prepared to stay on, not please stay on, and his response was he would consider it. now he then goes onto say he was asked to stay on and he agreed, but we really don't know what was said. that's his version, not the trump team's, and now when 47 have already automatically stepped aside because they know the protocol, the remaining 46 are asked to tender their resignations. the horror comes out, refuses to resign and can't believe

that this would apply to him and says donald trump will have to fire him, as if he's got a hold on that office, and preet, men bigger than you, gentlemen, have left when new administrations came in, giants like whitney seymour, robert fiske, rudy giuliani, james comey, david kelley, so since this happens all the time, what's the fuss? all day the trump haters claimed any change interrupts ongoing investigations of prosecutions and ultimately jeopardizes lady justice. that especially in offices where public corruption cases are tried, justice is at stake. as if only one man carries a whole office. cut it out!

do you really think that this is the first time in the history of this country that a prosecutor, federal, state, local, town, village, hamlet has been replaced by another one? what the hell do we do when they die? just give up? here's my question: no one but preet ba hara used the word fire, or asked for resignations. who knows? maybe some would have been asked to stay on, and just moments before we came on air ifound two were, even the they tendered their resignations, but because preet has such a huge ego, he thinks he's so all-important he couldn't believe such a request could possibly apply to him, he ramped it up and dared the

president of the united states to fire him. so what do you think happened? lady justice is winking under her bandages, and donald trump did what only donald trump can do so well. he said, "you're fired!" . up next, married priests? up next, married priests?

isjust wanna see ifa again? my score changed... you wanna check yours? scores don't change that much. i haven't changed. oh, really? ♪ it's girls' night they said business casual. i love summer weddings! oh no. yeah, maybe it is time. maybe i should check my credit score. try credit karma. it's free. oh woah. that's different. check out credit karma today. credit karma. give yourself some credit. if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission.

infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.

. judge jeanine: a shortage of priests has been a problem for the catholic church for sometime now. pope francis is open to the idea of letting married men become priests. joining me to discuss is father

gerald murray. father, good to have you back on "justice". now, i have to tell you, i'm catholic, went to catholic schools, the whole thing, when i heard this, i was flabbergasted! i didn't call my mother, i know how she must feel. does the pope have the right to change this? >> he does, if he wants to. judge jeanine: why? where did this come from? >> the idea has been around for a several decades. there was a lot of pressure to get rid of priestly celibacy and part of modernizing in the church that was rejected by pope paul vi, pope francis and pope benedict. it is not where we want to go. judge jeanine: you don't support it? >> not at all, i like what we have now. judge jeanine: i have to tell you with, all due respect, father, if i'm a priest and i practice celibacy for all those years and this guys comes in, got a wife, kids, married. why did i do this all these years?

>> some might say that, i'm happy the way i am, i'm happy being a priest and don't mind not having a wife and kids, i don't think you want to upset the people of god, the church in general by saying what we valued for 1,000 plus years is going to be cast aside. shortage of priests has to do with the lack of religious practice, not the fact that priests can't be married. we have to increase religious practice, get people praying, go to church, all that good stuff. that's how you solve the problem. judge jeanine: what it would take for the church to finally say, by the way, i'm reading about this and it says that already there are as many as 100 catholic priests in the united states that are married. who said they could be married? >> well, the pope, pope john paul ii made an exception for episcopalian ministers who were married and wanted to be catholic priests. judge jeanine: why? >> because they wanted to respect the fact they were serving the episcopalian church as a minister and want to serve

as the catholic church as a priest. judge jeanine: why didn't they stay episcopalian. >> they believe the catholic church is a true church and wanted to be part of it. judge jeanine: how long did it take? >> i'm not going to question, i'm glad they converted. we have married priests in ukraine and lebanon, places where married priests are. judge jeanine: certainly greek orthodox, i have an uncle who is greek orthodox. >> it's a fruitful and good thing. remember, christ wasn't married. judge jeanine: where did this start? >> started with jesus, jesus praised those who represent the kingdom. the most effective way is representing all ways of life, teaching, way of living and the fact we don't have a wife. we're totally at the disposition much the church. judge jeanine: you know where it goes from here? >> tell me. judge jeanine: i'm going to tell you. if married men can become priests, then you have the wivis and was reading that some

of them actually counsel couples together, the wife, then you have gay priests. then you're going to have women priests. equal rights, right? where is the catholic church going? >> put it at this, i'm not a supporter of changing this rule. the celibate clergy is one of the glories to the whole world. this allowed us to preach the gospel not worrying what kids are doing back at home. this is where we should stay. judge jeanine: thank you for let me talk to you about retirement. a 401(k) is the most sound way to go. let's talk asset allocation. -sure. you seem knowledgeable, professional. would you trust me as your financial advisor? -i would. -i would indeed. well, let's be clear, here. i'm actually a deejay. ♪ [ laughing ] no way! i have no financial experience at all. that really is you? if they're not a cfp pro, you just don't know. find a certified financial planner professional who's thoroughly vetted

at letsmakeaplan.org. cfp. work with the highest standard. my eyelove is making ♪"allsomething unexpected.ays my eyelove is girls' night out. my eyelove is the september issue. eyelove is all the things we love to do with our eyes. but it's also having a chat with your eye doctor about dry eyes that interrupt the things you love. because if you're using artificial tears often and still have symptoms, it could be chronic dry eye.

go to myeyelove.com and feel the love.

. judge jeanine: if you're phone was tapped, what's the worst thing they'd hear? time to hit the streets for some street justice. >> what if someone was listening to you on a wiretap. what's the worst thing you said to somebody? >> talking to my fiance sexually. >> would you be mortified? >> no. >> truth and honesty. good luck. they're listening to you on your telephone.

what's the worst thing that someone said to you that you are horrified if it got out? >> listen to me on my phone? >> yes. >> i'm not sure. >> yes, you are, you just don't want to say it! >> on my phone! >> yeah. >> what's the worst thing someone said to you on the phone because you know they're listening and it could be played at any time? >> vote for hillary. judge jeanine: that's the worst thing you said on the phone. >> yeah. judge jeanine: if all our phones are being tapped, what would be the most embarrassing thing. >> i can't think. judge jeanine: that bad? >> was it fun? at the time yes. [ laughter ] >> okay. do you want to tell us its name? tell me. >> please! [laughter]. judge jeanine: what was the worst thing someone said to you. >> watch where you going. judge jeanine: that's it? hey, you get to get some

excitement in your life. what's the worst thing someone said to you on the phone in the last week? >> they know better. judge jeanine: they know better? how tall are you? >> 6'2 1/2. judge jeanine: what was the worst thing someone said on the phone. >> i can't tell you that. judge jeanine: did they threaten you? >> no, no, no. judge jeanine: do you call the cops? >> no. judge jeanine: did you marry her? >> yes. judge jeanine: do you think the russians are listen? >> all the time. judge jeanine: you think the cia is listening? >> maybe. judge jeanine: okay. >> are you cia? judge jeanine: i could be but not in this life. >> are you wireed? . judge jeanine: damn right i'm wired. what do you think of "justice with judge jeanine"? sing for me!

[ dog singing ] . . ostriches don't really stick vitheir heads in the sand.ve horns on their helmets. and a real john deere is actually real affordable. you learn something new everyday. the surprisingly affordable john deere e series tractors.

for a drum line to perfect its routine. rocket mortgage by quicken loans is just as precise, but only takes a few minutes. so you can get a custom mortgage solution without missing a beat. quicken loans. proud supporter of college athletics. [drum line sfx: rocket] my thanks to the federal law enforcement officers association where i received the patriot award this week.

get ready for an all new face big broadcast that premieres april 7 at 9:00 p.m. on the big fox. thank you for joining us. >> you are watching the fox support. the first to give americans better health care, leading the charts, republicans on the president of doing what obama trump promised, obamacare replacement. >> their concerns about what will happen to the republicans american healthcare act. here's the next step, the congressional budget