tv The First 100 Days FOX News March 20, 2017 11:00pm-12:01am PDT
11:00 pm
in spite of the insanity, in spite of the abusive biased media because we are definitely looking out for you. >> tucker: a fox news alert, president donald trump wrapped up a rally in louisville after doing tough talk about illegal immigration. >> one by one, they are being cracked down and thrown the hill out of our country and we will not let them back in. >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." we will hear more from the president in a minute. you will not hear about director james comey testifying on capitol hill. it dominated cable television but the president did not mention it. we will have more on director comey's testimony. more than five hours on capitol hill, taking questions.
11:01 pm
it was a long hearing covered breathlessly from media around. what did we learn? pretty much what we already knew in november. russia makes up stories, it was them who dreamed up that the moon landing was faked almost 60 years ago. no one doubts their capacity for mischief. but after months of probing, there is precisely zero evidence that the russians had any effect on election outcomes. that does not mean we did not learn anything. we did. fbi director comey is obviously selective about which investigations he is willing to talk about. he confirmed that the bureau is investigating the trump campaign and at the same time he refused to say whether it is investigating felony leaking by government officials who destroyed general michael flynn. >> i'm just asking you the
11:02 pm
american people, you've already assured them he take it very seriously. can you assure them that it is going to be investigated. >> i can't but we seriously take classified investigations very seriously. >> tucker: we also learn something about director comey's political views. asked about brexit, comey had this to say. >> where they have a preference for candidate who had a preference for brexit? >> yes. >> tucker: how can comey possibly know what the russian leadership believed about brexit? he couldn't without clairvoyant powers. opposing the european union is the same as being a russian stooge, that would be the implication. the current state of the democratic party. what is the political stage after hysteria but just before total loss of motor function and unconsciousness? that is what it was like for
11:03 pm
hours today. >> our battleships weren't sunk and our towers did not collapse on in 2011. there is a year we should mark on our calendars. it is still going on, it didn't end on election day. >> tucker: keep in mind, pearl harbor and 9/11 pulled this country into the world altering global wars that dragged on for years. did he overstate? no, not according to his colleague. she described russian's actions as an act of war. >> in terms of trying to understand this, i think of a spider web with a tarantula in the middle. and the tarantula in my view is vladimir putin. who is entrapping many people to
11:04 pm
do his bidding and to engage with him. >> tucker: at [laughs] at [laughs] never mind don't actually catch their prey in a web. the number one super villain and almost certainly our next adversary on the battlefield. texas got so worked up about this that he read the buzzfeed dos year like it was a real document. although the hearings, at which he declared, we were attacked by russia. thank you for joining us. we were attacked by russia. how do we respond? do you think we should use long-range or short-range icbms? >> we should expand the sanctions we have and continue to investigate what they did and today we learned from the fbi director contrary to what you
11:05 pm
said, there was new information that there are members of the trump team who are under terminal and counterintelligence investigations. >> tucker: i was aware of that that. hold on, i want to take what you say seriously. i absolutely do. you said we were attacked by russia. that is not a small thing. an attack doesn't just invite a counterattack, it demands one. my question is, a carrier strike -- should they be mobilized immediately? should we notify our european allies? what is our next step in our counter attack? >> it should not be a warmer embrace of russia the president clearly said he wanted to do. we should expand nato's role, not contracted. we should talk tough with russia. we have a secretary of state who
11:06 pm
received a medal of friendship. >> tucker: i do not think they are a friend. i don't think anyone thinks that they are our friend. but we should talk tough in response to an act of war? i can't imagine a more irresponsible response to an act of war than talking tough. expanding nato -- we need a real response, do you not agree? how can we do otherwise? >> not every action requires a military response. there are cyber warfare as you can conduct. but tucker, take a step back. never in the history of our elections has a country attacked us the way that russia has. it was an electronic attack. it was not by a bomb or through a missile or bullet. they attacked us and try to influence the outcome of our campaign. i will be the first to say they did not change any vote tallies. >> tucker: i'm taking you seriously. they attacked us and you say it
11:07 pm
does not require military defense. what counterattack is really necessary? what would that look like? sanctions, nato, let's be real. >> we can squeeze their economy. their economy is in a free fall. we should isolate russia from the rest of the world. >> tucker: will not hurt putin really badly? will he run out of vodka or move into a hotel or something? >> that's why we had a hearing today. when i go home and talk to our constituents, they want to know if we are going to do anything or if the next election will see two, three, four of our adversaries try to influence and get their preferred candidates? >> tucker: i'm speaking half and just because i think this description of this is hysterical. you are a sitting congressman, one of your colleagues is a
11:08 pm
senator -- calling it an act of war. the russians are listening to this, i don't know how you can describe something as an act of war and recommended in response to pitted moves like i don't know, sanctions. really? >> sean: there's nothing we have more sacred than our democracy. >> tucker: you are saying this is war and you do want to do anything about it. >> i don't want to do what you want me to do. >> tucker: let's be really specific. what should we do? i'm taking you seriously. >> work with our allies in nato so they are also not as dependent on russia for the liquid, natural gas. one of the main sources for a lot of eastern european -- russia is. >> tucker: so we should ship -- you just said you want to make europe less dependent on russian energy. we are the largest natural gas
11:09 pm
producer in the world. are you for gas producers selling their gas in europe? are you for that? i know the natural resource defense fund is against that. >> for helping our european allies -- >> tucker: i'm laughing at your response. you are saying we should help europe become energy independent but we should not sell them natural gas customer >> of course we should. we should help others do the same. people at home, they take serious our elections. republicans and democrats can go at it back and forth, but as an outside midler comes in, that's off limits. both parties should say we will not tolerate it. it's an opportunity for republicans and democrats to unify and say never again will we allow ourselves to be in this mess. >> tucker: as soon as you
11:10 pm
define the effects of russian meddling, hacking, warmaking, whatever you are calling it, on our election, i think you will have a chance of bringing people to your side. you cannot provide an answer, though. >> i can. russia sought to tear down hillary clinton and lift up donald trump. our intelligence agencies have concluded that. i believe them, do you? >> tucker: i don't know, sometimes. i have a right to know more about how they reach their conclusions but they sort of missed 9/11 and the fall of the soviet union so i think it's fair to be skeptical. >> there's no counter evidence. >> tucker: you heard the fbi director today save that vladimir putin hated hillary clinton. hated her. he personally hated her. >> do you think he made that up? >> tucker: how would he know something like that? we don't even know ourselves. how would he know the innermost
11:11 pm
thoughts of -- why would he allege something like that? >> because of intelligence reporting. through electronic sources that are in the public report that the intelligence community put out. >> tucker: there is no indication of how we could note vladimir putin's most innermost thoughts about hillary clinton. >> should we trust the people who collect intelligence? >> tucker: declaring war against a sovereign country as you are attempting to do, we have a right to know on what basis you are doing that. if you are telling me you know what vladimir putin believes, i think it's fair to ask, how the hill would you know that? >> the he said he hates her per. >> i asked for evidence, i've received it.
11:12 pm
>> tucker: on that very specific question? you were satisfied that he would know what vladimir putin felt? are you further convinced that vladimir putin believed hillary clinton would lose? >> yes, yes. >> tucker: so not only is michael flynn clairvoyant, vladimir putin is as well. he's the only one in the world... >> the desired outcome was -- hillary clinton will go into the office so badly bruised. >> tucker: doesn't all of this undercut that theory? the effect is to badly undercut the administration of donald trump. >> if hillary clinton had one night, i would still -- >> tucker: why would he be behind a gambit like this?
11:13 pm
this hurts trump, why would putin want to do that? >> he has a guy in there right now who wants to roll back sanctions. and reverse the role of nato. >> tucker: if he said i believe you, congressman, i'm going after russia with long-range bombers. >> i would say ratchet up the sanctions. isolate russia. make putin pay for this. in 2021, i don't want to be sitting with you and talking about a different country that has been attacking our election elections. >> tucker: thank you, congressman. president trump had a lot to say tonight during a rally in louisville. we go to kristin fisher who is in louisville. nice to see you. >> hey, this was quite a rally. president trump said multiple times tonight this place is packed. and it was. he started out with greatest hits, promises made and promises
11:14 pm
kept. the issue that started it all, building a border wall. >> to be a rich nation, we must also be a safe nation. that's why i'm following through on my promise to secure, protect, and defend the borders of the united states. >> it that is what supporters here wanted to hear about, republicans on capitol hill wanted to hear about another campaign promise. repealing and replacing obamacare. >> as we move toward the crucial houseboat on thursday, the seventh anniversary of obamacare is very painful passage -- this is our long-awaited chance to finally get rid of obamacare. the long-awaited chance, we are going to do it. we're going to do it. >> one of the hospital's biggest
11:15 pm
critics is rand paul, tonight, president trump had this message for him. >> i happen to like a lot senator rand paul. i do. i do, i like him. he's good. he is a good guy. and i look forward to working with him so we can get this bill passed in some form, so that we can pass massive tax reform. >> the key word there, pass in some form, leaving the door wide open to some big negotiations if and when that bill gets to the senate. the other big question heading into tonight is it does president trump bring up the two big hearings today that happened on capitol hill? in the end, he only talked about one of them. judge neil gorsuch, hearing is now underway in the senate. i urge members of both parties
11:16 pm
to swiftly approve his nomination. he is an outstanding man from an outstanding family with an unbelievably wonderful wife. >> president trump talked about the judge neil gorsuch hearing but no mention tonight of the bombshell testimony from fbi director james comey confirming it ongoing investigation on whether or not there was any collusion between the trump campaign and russia. >> tucker: in some form. the line of the night. >> in some form. >> tucker: fbi director comey is not the only big name to appear on the hill today. a confirmation hearing for judge neil gorsuch, a full 47 days after the president nominated him to the supreme court. a lot happened, for more in details we to trace gallagher. >> hey, several democratic senators have already vowed to
11:17 pm
oppose neil gorsuch and block his nomination from coming to a final vote in their opening statement, they tried to tie gorsuch to president trump -- billing him to a as a threa to workers and women. and brought up merrick garland. obama's nominee. >> the senate sd -- nominated by a president who lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. >> during their 10 minutes of opening statements, republican senators applauded neil gorsuch calling him an extraordinarily talented with the highest levels of professional qualification, including integrity, competence, and temperament. they left outpatient but that was evident by the three hours gorsuch waited to speak on his own behal i have ruled for disad students, prisoners, the accuse
11:18 pm
accused. undocumented immigrants. sometimes i ruled against such persons. >> the showdown begins as democrats get their first chance to question judge gore such, chuck grassley was a committee vote on gorsuch by april 3rd in the full vote in the senate later that same week. >> tucker: trace gallagher. thank you. national communications director for the working families party, a progressive third party -- hostile to the nomination of judge gorsuch. he joins us now. thank you for coming on. >> thank you so much for having me on tonight, thank you for something you said last week. you and i may not agree on a tremendous amount but last week you were interviewing trump about the health care bill, and you pointed out that if centerpiece was a massive tax cut for investors, the other
11:19 pm
side of the coin was millions of people who are going to actually lose their health care coverage. >> tucker: i don't know if the tax cut is the centerpiece. it certainly component. >> is an odd place to put the tax credit in my view. >> tucker: i appreciate that, joe. let me ask you about the judge here. let me tell you why a bring up -- the meat of what i want to talk to, the supreme court nomination. i am sure you do not agree with a lot of the beliefs the judge has but the core question is, can he interpret the constitution faithfully? i'm figuringly your problem is with this guy. here's a letter that you sent to democratic members of the senate. you said he has an extreme ideological agenda supported by some of the most dangerous ultraconservative and white nationalist groups. what does that even mean?
11:20 pm
>> i think this means that neil gorsuch is someone who is shown through his long record that every act he has taken, whenever given the chance between siding with a corporation or a working-class person, every single time he has picked the other side than i would've picked. i don't know if you're following -- >> tucker: so you are saying white supremacist organizations. he have every right to disagree with his decisions but you are trying to tar him with the brush of white supremacy and my question is, on the basis of what evidence did you say that? >> gorsuch -- trump has this muslim ban he is trying to pass, it has been swatted down by judges twice. one justice away from someone who would overrule those lower court decisions and make a muslim ban the law of america. i thought america with the land that believed in religious freedom for all people and i have not heard gorsuch
11:21 pm
forcefully denounce a muslim ban. >> tucker: [laughs] because gorsuch has not come out during the nomination process -- i think is what you are saying -- during his own nomination process and attacked trump's travel ban, you call him a white supremacist? that's so unfair, it's hard to believe you're actually saying that. >> it's one of the core questions of public policy right now, whether or not our country is one that has a place for people of all religions or whether trumka be allowed to pass a band. >> tucker: he began four days of his hearings where he could be asked that, by the way, a supreme court justice job is not to formulate public policy, is to interpret the constitution. and determine whether it is constitutional or not. >> and he has fallen way short of the standard of saying -- >> tucker: you tried to tie him to white supremacists. i just want you to -- that is an
11:22 pm
unfair thing to say and you should not think things like that unless you have reasons for saying that. >> denouncing trump's muslim ban becomes close to that line. >> tucker: is that the standard. >> there are a lot of problems with the nomination of gorsuch. >> tucker: you said something appalling and unfair. >> let's move on. >> tucker: i think our viewers understand and you understand that something that's indefensible and you should concede it. your point is that he is against working people. right? >> choosing between corporations and a working person, he chooses the wrong side. this case he was a judge on with a truck driver, going through illinois -- a truck driver had to pull over and the brakes on his trailer were frozen on a
11:23 pm
freezing cold subzero day. to protect his own safety and maybe even save his life, he disconnected his trailer, drove away to safety. in the end, his employers fired him for doing that. the court cited against -- the only way he could have protected his job was sit in a freezing cold subzero truck and risk his life. >> tucker: i'm not sure you understand what the supreme court is or how it works. i agree with you, every person watching, you should not be fired for leaving a freezing cold truck. >> neil gorsuch does not agree with that. >> tucker: his job is to interpret the law as passed by the congress, not the court. if the actions are consistent with the law, there's nothing you can do about it. that is what the job is.
11:24 pm
>> every time he is asked to make a decision, he always chooses the side of corporations. >> tucker: why are you complaining to your friends -- hey, pass a law protecting people whose trucks break down? >> the court sided with the driver in that case. it's a funny thing, about gorsuch's -- >> tucker: there are democrats siding with gorsuch. >> same with the hobby lobby case. where he said the right of corporations religious beliefs are more important than the person working there. >> tucker: i have it right in front of me. the green family that owns hobby lobby, their religious beliefs were sincere. you may find them repugnant, all you need to know is that they were sincere and therefore protected by the religious freedom restoration act of 1993.
11:25 pm
>> as an evenhanded observer, he was protecting the law? siding with the less powerful side than the powerful corporate entity? >> tucker: he did side with the less powerful person. the greens as you know are reviled by most people. if you were to do a poll saying are you sympathetic to hobby lobby or the federal government? i bet it would be 90/10, there's no more unfashionable person than the plaintiffs in this cas case. >> who has the power to fire him who? if you think the employers and ceos are the less powerful people in a comparison with the people who work for them, and i've got news for you -- they are not as -- >> tucker: i don't think that.
11:26 pm
these disparities are addressed in the legislative branch. that is what democracy is. if you want something, you change it through legislation. that is the whole system. but you don't bother doing that, you try to put judges in who will do what you want. affect the outcome you desire and that is not constitutional and it is also antidemocratic. people don't get a chance to vote on that stuff. >> that's not right. when you have a person who every single time has to make the choice choosing the side of the corporation, he is someone who thinks the huge unlimited amounts of money that are currently flooding our electoral system are not enough. the reason i connect this to health care is because i think it's part of a pattern where you see the trump administration and their appointees over and over again siding with the wealthy and powerful at the expense of everybody else whether it is their desire to roll back wall street, their desire to -- >> tucker: i just lived through eight years of the most massive wealth disparity build
11:27 pm
up in my lifetime. under the obama administration. where the overwhelming majority of the spoils were at the top 1 1%. if he does make it worse, i will be the first to complain. >> is that true? i will be emailing to find out about that one. every single thing trump has proposed so far. >> tucker: joe, thank you for joining us. up next, what if we try to being friendly with russia instead of treating them like a comic book villain all the time? describing the possible describing the possible advantages of that course, stay
11:30 pm
i work with people everywhere on sea, on land, and in the air. inspecting towers way up high avoiding turbulence in the sky. personalizing treatments with dna and recommending who should play. a dress that thinks, which crops to grow, tax prep to help keep payments low. you can find me on an oil rig, i answer questions small and big. hello, my name is watson.
11:31 pm
>> do you have any evidence that russian cyber attackers changed votes in the state of michigan? pennsylvania? the state of north carolina? >> no, sir. no, sir. >> tucker: that was the director of the nsa, mike rogers. there's no proof they actually changed the election last fall. mark stein is an author and commentator, he says russia is fundamentally western and that means something. he joins us now from burlington, vermont. a fundamentally western city. >> this is lest western than many russian cities. >> tucker: it's pretty low. what is this about? i understand -- hurting the
11:32 pm
trump people, fine. democrats seem actually mad in a way that i cannot remember them being. why? >> they are mad at russia because they to believe that they did not lose the election, that somebody stole it from them. that's why what we saw today with frankly nuts. the democrats as you said, they turned put an end to a bond villain. the man with the midas touch, at that congresswoman almost saying today. two sound bites insisting they will build a new berlin wall and get russia to pay for it. this is going nowhere for them, it's a massive headache and if you did subscribe seriously to the theory that putin was trying to mess with america, what we have now? an internal investigation that is designed to track down the
11:33 pm
united states government. this investigation, this hearing is actually doing putin's bidding more than having some cabinet secretary in his pocket would. today's hearing was bizarre in a very particular way. when someone like comey says vladimir putin absolutely hates hillary clinton, what business is that of a domestic law enforcement agency? why the hell is the fbi trying to figure out what vladimir putin thinks of a washed up losing presidential candidates? >> tucker: what should our posture towards russia be? i'm kind of agnostic. what should i think about russia? >> i think rush is fundamentally -- you strip away a century of
11:34 pm
communism -- russia is essentially the prodigal child of western civilization. it is checkoff and the idea thae need to turn it into an enemy simply because it has a flaw to government i think it's idiotic. mike flynn, i am in favor of phlegm being gone, not just with his ties for the russians but bt to civilization them vladimir putin is. that conversation you were having at the top of the show, in which democrats are demanding that we double down on sanctions, again, i think we ought to start thinking about this in a reasonable way. crimea, 19th century imperialist here, engraved in my soul -- i think crimea is a legitimate
11:35 pm
sphere of russian influence. the idea that democrats are suddenly prepared to launch world war iii over crimea -- it's completely preposterous. where were they almost 40 years ago? >> tucker: in a very different place. a little weird to hear people who lionize hugo chavez. trump's position, he said it out loud, we share a common enemy with radical islam. is that a tenable plan? >> i think so. at his rally tonight, he was emphasizing american plans, make america great again. putin wants to make russia great again. and so far as those objectives do not conflict, we should think strategically. russia has had a much better track record in syria. they've kept their strongman in
11:36 pm
place, we spent 15 years in ina ramshackle stone age basket caves like afghanistan and we've got nothing to show for it. trump is right, we can learn from putin in these parts of the world. >> tucker: nicely put. mark stein. >> thank you. >> tucker: up next, what would ronald reagan do? we will talk to a rake and biographer about he may have handled
11:40 pm
>> tucker: mark was just on and he made the point that america being safe doesn't mean you have to be at war with russia. some lawmakers determined to make that country and enemy, perhaps a military foe. we may nebulae befall into an second world war. what can we learn from reagan's example? a reagan biographer is here with us, written another book called
11:41 pm
reagan rising, just before reagan came back to become president. great to see you. >> thank you. >> tucker: you have written a lot on this president and this period. did you ever think you would grow old enough to see democrats pushing for a new world order? >> no, i didn't. it's a new world order. >> tucker: the debate in the '80s, it was democrats are too soft on russia. >> yes, on arms control. soviet expansionist. they are always soft on the soviets. going back to the famous -- >> tucker: reagan obviously hated soviet communism. >> there was no animosity toward the russian people. he really knew -- he abhorred the idea of nuclear war but he
11:42 pm
was obsessed with defeating the soviet union in the cold war but he knew to beat an idea with a better idea -- she was once flying over the suburbs on his way to an air force base. he was looking out the window and he said mr. president, what do you see down there? he says, i've got to get gorbachev to see what we have here. we have a better idea for governance, prosperity and freedom and opportunity here than they have there. >> tucker: your book is about the years between reagan's attempt to become the republican nominee and then his victory in 1980. what did he do to make that possible? >> that's what the book is about, of course. he took advantage of every political opportunity that was handed to them. it was a time of almost a conservative enlightenment, coming into fold.
11:43 pm
flowering in the 1970s, we were rejecting the new deal, the great society, the panama canal treaties, tax cuts afghanistan, the left was being proven wrong at every level. you can't win an election despite being against something. you have to be for something. reagan is evolving as a conservative. in 1964 he speaks for goldwater. it was a great, great speech but reagan is often angry in the speech. he's angry at the antiwar protesters, the great society, lbj, by 1977, he is now rejecting a much more hopeful message -- the answer is conservative, not just antiliberalism, it's pro-conservative. that's what he's doing, evolving as a conservative to a much more optimistic one. >> tucker: you have to be for something.
11:44 pm
>> everything is centered on human freedom. personal, private freedom. >> tucker: the framework, all of it hung on being for something. up next, a dreadful story from the d.c. suburbs. instead of being sent home, he went to high school and put in ninth grade for some reason and now he is charged boost it's about moving forward not back.
11:45 pm
it's looking up not down. it's feeling up thinking up living up. it's being in motion... in body in spirit in the now. boost. it's not just nutrition. it's intelligent nutrition. with 26 vitamins and minerals and 10 grams of protein. all in 3 delicious flavors. it's choosing to go in one direction... up. boost. be up for it.
11:46 pm
this is my new best friend, esther. she might look like any normal, playful puppy but esther's being raised to become a canine companions for independence assistance dog for a person with a disability. to get there, she needs lots of loving care and attention, plenty of exercise and good eating habits so that she can live a long and healthy life for her future family. visit cci.org or call 1-800-572-bark. raise a puppy change a life. you can make a world of difference in the life of a person with a disability. ... ...
11:48 pm
11:49 pm
reported. despite being the age of upperclassman, both alleged rapists were classified as freshman, who shared the same grade as they are much younger victim. a resident of rockville, campaigning against that city becoming a sink for a city. thank you for coming on. the sadness of all of this is that earlier this month, march, you wrote a letter to the mayor and city council of rockville saying this could potentially be a problem. you obviously were horrified that this happened. >> we had a public hearing. 88 people signed up, ten left because it went too long. i submitted a petition against it because there was a petition to recommend to the mayor and council to it become a sanctuary city but it really didn't use that language, they were actually saying they wanted to have policy on how the rockville police department should enforce the immigration law. of course we know that our
11:50 pm
county is very liberal. i think the city is going to follow their suit, the other problem is that the state is going forth with making it a sanctuary state. quite a few of us are upset about this. >> tucker: you are an immigrant. you came from this to this couy from europe as a child. you said our freedoms are in jeopardy, decided to enforce the laws they like. if you don't like a law, change it. >> we had a lot of chinese people speak, they said they had to wait in line to come here and that they have issues with the fact that they came here for law and order and that these people who are coming here illegally are being protected and it is not right. >> tucker: they came here because they wanted to live in a place where law was taken seriously, people retreating equally. the bitter irony for them and for you. is that how you feel as an
11:51 pm
immigrant? >> definitely so. i am for law and order, i've been fighting this. when the situation in rockville happened, it made me upset because of the fact that a 14-year-old girl was not protected in high school and all the money that we -- our taxes goes mostly to schools, they have a situation where they allow illegals to come into a high school, at 17 and 18, illegal, do not speak english and have an opportunity to do this kind of crime to a 14-year-old is really very disheartening. >> tucker: there is one of the perpetrators right there. most people who come to this country legally or illegally are not like this. like this guy is alleged to be but the truth is, it does not improve your school, a lot of people come -- they should do better, shouldn't they? >> they should have had some remedial english class first. what i do not understand, how
11:52 pm
can two boys grab a 14-year-old girl and put her into the men's room and rape her? if you look at the police report, it is ridiculous what they did. rape is one thing but it is just awful. they tried to hold her face to keep from screaming. this is in a school. how can 18-year-olds -- >> tucker: how to an 18 write 1d up in a ninth grade classroom? if you're doing that, is that the message, you don't want to educate these kids? >> i don't think you need to put these kind of illegal kids and legal kids -- if you are here as an illegal, you are here against the law and that is a crime. that's the way i look at it. >> tucker: you have an old-fashioned view of that. >> all of the ones that are waiting in line to come here illegally, i just spoke with the driver that brought me here. he said his father took eight
11:53 pm
years before he could bring his family here. that is sad. you see what happens here. some illegals -- i don't know how they got here. it's very disheartening. >> tucker: you are an articulate spokesperson. other immigration news, michigan being more vibrant by introducing ace port there cockfighting. they discovered a massive cockfighting ring in southwest detroit. 86 people were arrested along with hundreds of chickens. no surprise, many of the people there were not here legally. roughly 50 people who are involved, welcome to your new country. i hope you are enjoying it. it is not just congress discrediting itself about russia, we will highlight the most egregious hysterics from the press. after the break. liberty mutual stood with me
11:54 pm
when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night. hold on dad... liberty did what? yeah, liberty mutual 24-hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. my dad says our insurance doesn't have that. don't worry - i know what a lug wrench is, dad. is this a lug wrench? maybe? you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.
11:58 pm
>> tucker: time now for what they really think. deep inside the bowels of social media. i am sorry, disgusting. they don't think you are listening. much like democratic congressman, the press seized upon fbi director comey today. tweeting today... trach out a far concerned with reporters revealing details than russia's role in hacking the 2016 election. hacking the election, what does that mean, by the way? someone, please define it. if not for the illegal leaks by
11:59 pm
gaudi, much of those records were legal illegal leaks, the t comparison possible for a political reporter, watergate of course, tweeting this... focusing their attention on unauthorized leaks. again, note the wording. leaks were not on illegal, just unauthorized. [laughs] funny. not a parody because that would be literally impossible. that is it for us tonight, tune in every night at 9:00 p.m. to the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and groupthink. "hannity" is up next. speaker paul ryan will be on it. kellyanne conway also there, just saw her in the makeup room. she is ready. we will be back tomorrow. see you then.
12:00 am
♪ >> tom: welcome to "red eye," hello everyone, i am tom shillue. let's check in with the tvs a andy levy this before. >> andy: coming up on the big show, democrats on the house intelligence committee tried to get fbi director james comey to reveal details into the ongoing investigation. plus, a priest, a rabbi, and a man in the trump hat
91 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on