>> dana: i'm dana perino with kimberly guilfoyle, bob beckel, eric bolling, and greg gutfeld, it's 5:00 in new york city, and this is "the five" ." high drama in the nation's capital. vote was expected in the house on the g.o.p. bill to repeal and replace obamacare, but it's not happening now until perhaps tomorrow or later. many conservative republicans are withholding support, leaving their party short of the votes needed. republicans are scheduled to meet behind closed doors at 7:00

eastern. president still working hard to strike a deal. let's go to john roberts with the latest. >> white house expecting a vote will happen tomorrow but i hasten to remind you they were expecting it to happen today. the president will be meeting in a few minutes with members of what's called the tuesday group, a group of about 50 moderate house republicans trying to bring them onboard because as the president makes changes to satisfy the conservatives, the moderates are beginning to drift. it's a fine line he's walking. a little while ago, he had a group of truckers and trucking ceos to the white house. the president was sitting down to talk health care with them just as he got the news. at that point, the president thought there was going to be a vote. >> today the house is voting to repeal and replace the disaster known as obamacare. we will see what happens. it's going to be a close vote.

close not because obamacare is good. it's politics. everybody knows it's no good. it's only politics. we have a great bill and i think we have a very good chance. >> moments after that the president was informed by a member of the press pool that the vote had been delayed, postponed maybe until tomorrow, maybe until monday. the one group the president, walking across the drive there, the freedom caucus. 30 or so conservative republicans on the house saying they don't like the bill because it still contains the regulatory framework of the affordable care act. they want the president to rip that out but if he does that there is the potential he's going to start to alienate some of the moderates. at any rate, mark meadows, chairman of the freedom caucus, says even though he said last night on "hannity" that it looked like they had the framework of a deal, he's not

there yet. >> this artificial deadline we have at this particular point of about tonight actually is something we imposed on ourselves. i am optimistic we can find common ground with at least 51 or 52 senators. i am desperately trying to get a "yes." >> still a know at this point but trying to get to yes. unclear with the president is going to have to give him to get him to yes. the more he gets the conservatives, the more he stands to alienate the moderates. and the more he may run up against the byrd rule in the senate. this is kind of getting down in the weeds but they think they've got a formula to do that at this point. they are going to suggest that the regulations that are in the affordable care act that are now in the new american health care act are indelibly tied to the obamacare subsidies. if you get rid of the subsidies,

you've got to get rid of the regulations as well. interesting and clever argument they are making. >> dana: thank you so much. kimberly, you can't fault the president for not trying. he has tried to get everybody there, but i think as they try to make it more palatable to the house freedom caucus, he ran the risk of losing some moderates. a lot of the guys in the house freedom caucus, the votes are harder to get. >> kimberly: it is tricky and there are some trust issues where people were worried, was mcconnell going to mess them over. what was going to happen? it's tough. you mentioned yesterday, the president of the united states, you want him to come out of the box strong and be able to get this through. not turning out to be the case despite his best efforts. he was relying on paul ryan to be able to get it through. they fell short.

you have to look at why are they falling short? what was missing that wasn't palatable? they had enough time to think about it. would have been great if they could've gotten it through. maybe it's going to happen tomorrow but it certainly won't be for lack of effort from president trump, vice president pence, everyone picking up the phone and calling. trying to get -- >> dana: including the freedom caucus, who i think were trying to negotiate in good faith. mark meadows was saying i want to get the yes but he felt like he wasn't going to be able to do it. >> eric: the reason they can't get to yes is that the bill doesn't reduce the cost of health care for the average american. the freedom caucus knows it. here's the problem. i'm going to say a couple things that are probably going to upset some people. paul ryan promised to deliver a bill that would pass the house. he promised to deliver donald trump health care bill that was going to pass the house, and they could send it to the senate. he delivered something that wasn't ready. he should have waited, could

have taken his time, or he could have incorporated their freedom caucus into the development of the plan which he didn't. rand paul knocking on doors think i want to see the bill. the reason was it was done behind closed doors. my problem is it sounds a lot like what we went through in 2009 and 2010 with the louisiana purchase and the cornhusker kickback. the davis bill came out i was on "outnumbered." they said this is a health care. i went on and i read it and i said in minutes, this is dead on arrival. there was no demonstrable lowering of the cost of health care. now i'm going to say the part that's going to probably take off a lot of people. this is a win for donald trump. may look like a loss but it's the changing of the guard. i've been talking about this for the better part of two years. paul ryan, mitch mcconnell promised a health care bill that was going to pass get through

and it didn't and it's not. what it looks like to me is trump promised changed. he is getting change. the establishment old-school republicans have to relinquish the control. go back to the drawing board, get something more conservative and bring it to the american people. >> dana: relinquish control? what would that look like? >> eric: don't demand that this is a bill the american people are going to like and have two major voting groups for donald trump having a massive increase in health care costs and expect them te to it and want to reelect donald trump in 2020. >> dana: do you think they could've crafted a bill that would pass the house and meet the president's request, the people who wanted health insurance could get health insurance. universal access but with competition? >> bob: they can talk all they want but there's a fundamental divide between the freedom caucus on the rest of the republicans. i don't think there's a way to put it together. you can do across state lines,

you could do tort reform. that's not going to be enough for them. the cost of health care which donald trump promised is going to get lower. >> eric: it would reduce the cost but you can't do it. you need a 60 vote senate majority. he >> bob: you have a flawed bill. this bill was moved quickly, secretively. they did not include people deported together, including donald trump who came in at the end and said okay, fine, paul ryan has it. >> kimberly: promises were made that was going to happen. >> bob: the idea this isn't a loss for donald trump, i couldn't disagree more. he signed on the bill, he pushed it. he's had more meaning summit than anything else and he didn't get it through. will they get it through tomorrow? if they do, it's going to be a bill -- i can't imagine what it's going to be like. you get the senate and the senate has already enough votes to do the house bill.

>> dana: i thought of your point, greg. once you provide an entitlement or bill that makes people feel like they are getting something that they deserve from the government, it is hard to pull it back. >> greg: you push an elephant into a hole and you can't get the elephant out. it >> kimberly: you have tried? >> greg: yes. i am more interested in what happened to kevin sorbo. >> eric: this bill came down at 10:00 in the morning and they said look, we want you to go hard-core health care during the hour. i ran down the hall. >> greg: hercules, i saw him in town square. anyway, i don't know if it's good or bad that they put this off. it's like a final exam when you find out they put it off the day and you go oh, great, more time to study but you don't study.

you watched 12 episodes of law & order. you prolong the agony, the test doesn't get any easier. they should have the vote, get it over with. the one thing i have to say. >> kimberly: ate a lot of otter pops. >> greg: shows you the difference between right and left. the left says they are poor transparency but the rate is about as transparent as you can get. the fight is like an open kitchen where you are allowed to see the sausage being made. that's what you saw the last three weeks with the obamacare repeal and replace with the democrats prefer a back room kitchen where they butcher a horse and collect a chicken. >> bob: they put this together, five of them in a back room. >> greg: that's funny. at least we knew it was in the bill. i can explain the three steps.

obamacare was done in the dead of night and no one read it. >> eric: that was after they released with the bill was. i remember rand paul walking down the halls of the house saying i want to read the bill that is supposed to be the next obamacare. it was under lock and key. >> kimberly: it shouldn't have come to this to begin with. this is the problem. >> eric: the wheeling and dealing going on right now reminds me a lot of what went on in 2009. >> greg: he is a dealmaker. that was the whole point of trump. he listens and finds a solution. >> eric: the bill was going to have to sit for 72 hours for all members to read it and understand it before they voted on it. now we are trying to say m i don't know. >> greg: it's not his fault. it's never his fault.

>> eric: make no mistake, this is on paul ryan, not donald trump. paul ryan promised a bill that was going to be good enough to pass the house. he presented something that can't get through the house. the reason paul ryan canceled the 3:30 3:30 press conferencee knew he didn't have the votes. that is paul ryan, not donald trump. >> greg: the dealmaker didn't get the deal but it's not his fault. >> eric: not yet. you have vice president pence, oversee the process where you wipe out the role where you need 60 votes for the across state lines. get rid of that and bring it to the front of the deal. >> greg: i think kevin sorbo would disagree. >> dana: what if you lose a bunch of moderates? new developments on the report from congressman's bh.

various: (shouting) heigh! ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen,

all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here.

♪

>> eric: today the republican chairman of the house intelligence committee addressed the decision to disclose information about incidental interception of communication from the trump team without telling his colleagues. >> i know they are concerned and i understand that. that's why i thought it was important yesterday for me to talk to all of you to say that i was going to go let the president know this. before i went over there. it's a judgment call on my part at the end of the day, sometimes you make the right decision, sometimes you make the wrong one but you've got to stick by the decisions you make. >> eric: representatives nunes maintains there was incidental collection by u.s. intelligence and says more information will come out hopefully by tomorrow. he privately apologized to his democratic colleagues today for leaving them in the dark a bit but that may not be enough for some of them. here is a ranking committee member adam schiff. >> we need to do a real investigation of this and we

need to do it credibly. we can't have our chair acting as a surrogate for the administration. he has to either have the surrogate role or the chairman role but he can't do both. >> eric: i i guess he is saying in the interest of transparency he wanted to get the information out there. schiff feels that nunes should have notified the rest of the committee prior to going public. >> kimberly: wasn't the right protocol. he should've let them know before he went to the public. but i guess he apologized and said perhaps he should have handled it differently. nevertheless, that does not impact, affect the content of the information that he was conveying. now we have to get to the bottom of that and see what other evidence materializes pursuant to the investigation. >> eric: it feels, and he alluded to, nunes alluded to

there's more coming. feels like this is just the beginning of the first trickle of may be the flow of information. >> greg: the incidental collection, that is not the story. it's what happened afterwards with the information. here's a simple analogy pray let's say you are in line at confession and your neighbor is confessing and you hear bits and pieces. an act with a gardener may be. it's not your fault you overheard it. it is incidental collection of information. if you broadcast it to your mother's bridge club later, that is the sin. that's what we are talking about here. it's not about the collection. that happens to everybody. it is the dissemination afterwards. i think that's what you have to focus on, right? >> dana: more information means both of these stories are going to be fueled and the underlying questions about collusion and you've got the alleged collusion with manafort and former people close to trump

on the campaign and then you have the leaking of the names that were unmasked in the report. maybe one or others. i think that nunes apologizing to his colleagues was the right thing to do. it sullied the investigative process. if they want to keep this on the hill which i think they should. if you support president trump, you should want this to not go to a special prosecutor. they should figure out a way to work professionally with each other like the intelligence committee showed. keep it aboveboard. i don't think anyone has anything to worry about in terms of getting in trouble. constantly trying to help prove them right on this issue, you're going to get to the underlying issue. it's why you went to confession in the first place. >> greg: you don't want to know. >> kimberly: you would be there all week. >> eric: don't you agree there is more they are there. >> bob: i think there is about the russian connection.

>> eric: i am talking about the legal or less than lingle surveillance. >> bob: let's get back to what schiff said about nunes. you can't be a surrogate for the white house and chairman of the intelligence committee. this is unprecedented. i can't imagine how the public would take any finding from a nunes led committee that they would consider to be accurate, fair. it's got to have a special prosecutor. there's a lot here, and why not get it off the hill? put it in the hands of a special prosecutor. trump and his people are afraid they're going to find out the russians and the trump team colluded on the election. >> eric: do they need a special prosecutor? i would say they can handle it on their own. >> kimberly: they can totally handle in on their own and they need to push forward in a professional way. maintain the ethics and integrity and get to the bottom

of it. the american people deserve to know exactly what happened. there is something interesting in what nunes reported saying that the surveillance did not involve the ongoing fbi inquiry into russia's alleged involvement, so therefore if they were capturing stuff it was an american citizen and it didn't have intelligence value, the identity should remain secret. the information should be discarded in the incidental collection. >> bob: what nunes did, he is getting attacked from the left and right. >> eric: who leaked michael flynn's name? why don't we have a special investigator find out? >> bob: have a special prosecutor get it out of the hands of these right wing nuts. >> eric: you don't want a special prosecutor -- his name was illegally leaked. flynn. >> bob: because flynn was

doing illegal things. >> eric: that is the difference greg pointed out. it's not the act. it's the act of the leaking. >> bob: how do we know? flynn was on the phone, probably got picked up through we know did it. >> greg: where was kevin sorbo in all this? >> kimberly: maybe he can call in. >> eric: sean hannity interviews devin nunes tonight at 10:00 p.m. brand-new developments on the terror attack in london. we know more about the jihadi who went on a rampage yesterday. details of that when "the five" returns. just like the people

who own them, every business is different. but every one of those businesses will need legal help as they age and grow. whether it be help starting your business, vendor contracts or employment agreements. legalzoom's network of attorneys can help you every step of the way so you can focus on what you do. we'll handle the legal stuff that comes up along the way. legalzoom. legal help is here.

we ship everything you atcan imagine.n, and everything we ship has something in common. whether it's expedited overnight... ...or shipped around the globe, ...it's handled by od employees who know that delivering freight... ...means delivering promises.

od. helping the world keep promises.

>> bob: welcome back. we turn to yesterday's devastating terror attack in london. we know the identity of the man who killed four people and he himself was also killed. the death toll just rose. more than two dozen injured.

his name is khalid masood. we learned today one of the victims was an american. his wife was also injured. more from our chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge. >> in the last 15 minutes, confirmation that a fourth civilian was killed. as we learn more about the suspect, 52-year-old khalid masood was known to police with a criminal record and history of extremist views, but british authorities say there was no intelligence tying him to an imminent plot. a marauding attack when an individual who is self radicalized acts alone and turns every day items into weapons. these plots are among the hardest to disrupt. neutralizing the suspect and limit the loss of life. the british did not go public with the suspects name until this afternoon. former army intelligence officer telling fox it's likely part of

an investigative strategy. >> i totally understood the british government's decision not to release the name of the terrorist because they wanted to arrest the rest of the network before they splashed the name everywhere in the network knew enough to flee. i think that's what you saw with the overnight rate in birmingham as they exploited some intelligence they received. >> kurt cochran from utah is among the dead, and his wife melissa seriously injured. the couple celebrating their 25th wedding anniversary where they were mowed down by the suv on westminster bridge. the claim of responsibility comes from a new service, isis media outlets. they called the 52-year-old a soldier of the islamic state. the tweet offers no direct evidence masood was recruited or trained by isis. >> bob: let me ask you, eric. yesterday, sort of left the impression this was a bad man who maybe had ties to isis but was acting alone.

network of people which means this was probably planned out well in advance. >> eric: may or may not have been planned out but the point is once again, it's another isis-inspired attack. whether he was working with isis or homegrown jihadi decided he wanted to fight for the cause. it's perfect for them, they can create more fear and terror in london. i hope it's not too early to do this. while we mourn these victims, this was a man who took his car and a nice and ended up killing four innocent victims, no gun involved. when you see him here, you have the left coming out outraged about gun violence, it doesn't really matter. it's not the gun that pulled the trigger. it's the human being. it's not the car or the knife that kills people, it's the terrorist. >> bob: there was indication

the british knew about this guy. they had followed him for a while and they let him go. seems to me this happened last year where they had some and they were following and they decided to let it go. is this a failure of the intelligence community or we just can't follow everybody. >> dana: i think there's a pattern. almost all the terrorist attacks, either here in america or overseas, they had some brush with the fbi or intelligence community that looked at them but there's nothing they've done where you could detain them. i imagine the people they arrested were probably within that initial contact he had with law enforcement, the intelligence community. that's the network they had and may be those people are innocent but i would assume they are there. in western civilization, you can't detain people because you think they might do something bad in the future. you have to wait until they do something bad. in this case, what isis has inspired is for people to do these type of attacks, mowing

down using vehicles. hard to guard against. as a terrorist tactic, it's effective if we let it get to us. >> bob: can't you follow these guys, monitor them? >> kimberly: yes but when you think about the allocation of resources in the intelligence community. how many of them can you get after and keep track of and you can't just preemptively take them in. you have a situation here, you saw the quick work right after because they were kind of aware of the guy. you had am i five working with nsa. trying to get information from an encrypted devices, text messages. they start framing out contact and associates and they were able to put it together. this started out with al qaeda back and then '90s saying this is the type of thing you could do. as far as i'm concerned, there

is no lone wolf. people are radical electrical radicalized in whatever way they can. isis able to connect a network and radicalize and reach people all over the place. even the poorest among people have cell phones. >> bob: greg hasn't gotten in. do you want to say one sentence? >> greg: yeah, goodbye. civilization is always going to be at a disadvantage with this. we are always playing catch up. as we plug a whole, terrorists will find new holes to fill. a failure to fight terror is a failure in diligence but it's a failure in imagination. you have to continually think like a terrorist. you have to think about how do you make something deadly? box cutter plus a plane created a missile. that never happened before. one thing i want to bring up, i fear we are suffering from what i call the belief that lighting

candles and making heart shaped symbols with your hand is somehow ineffective action against evil. while it's a lovely sentiment to show support for the people who are suffering, you cannot stop there. you can't say we go out in march and light a candle and that's where it ends and we start talking about compassion and love and we start talking about, then we get to islamaphobia. we totally skip the point i just mentioned which is hardening soft targets and diligence period we that because we are too busy preaching love and kisses. >> bob: next, bill o'reilly tears apart. >> kimberly: that's not even a heart. >> bob: bill o'reilly tears apart the mainstream media for ignoring the rockville, maryland, rape story because the suspects are illegal immigrants. i accept i don't race down

the slopes like i used to. i even accept i have a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat not caused by a heart valve problem. but whatever trail i take, i go for my best. so if there's something better than warfarin, i'll go for that too. eliquis. eliquis reduced the risk of stroke better than warfarin, plus had less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis had both. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis,

you may bruise more easily... ...and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. i'm still going for my best. and for eliquis. ask your doctor about eliquis.

>> kimberly: to illegal immigrants were arrested last week for allegedly raping a 14-year-old girl inside a high school in rockville, maryland. you haven't seen it on the big three network newscasts. abc, cbs, nbc. they did devote tons of coverage to the fake report by rolling stone in 2014 that members a fraternity gang raped a female student at uva. bill o'reilly put the mainstream media on blast for their blackout of the story. >> it is beyond anything i've ever seen in my 40 years plus of journalism. a story of that magnitude ignored by the national media. we all know why. illegal immigration is a political issue. president trump has made the apprehension of undocumented criminals a top priority. we have a president who vowed to stop the illegal alien criminal

madness. we have a media that openly opposes that, allowing the sanctuary movement to run wild. >> kimberly: eric, there's been a lot of discussion about this. we have seen this story covered on fox news, as it should be. hearken back to the time when the uva story, the rape that didn't occur, was given widespread attention across the mainstream media. not this important story. >> eric: o'reilly was fired up last night. we may have made these points as well but why is a 17 and 18-year-old mixed in with a freshman, 14-year-old girl. why does that happen? clear failure. this is me. clear failure by the school board and the principal. there is no way that should happen. it can't happen. they have to fix it. maybe because they are so politically correct, fear of looking like they are being, i don't know, less than -- >> kimberly: discriminatory? >> eric: the point is,

illegals, and i will say again, and we have this argument on the show quite a bit. illegals commit violent crime after they are caught at a far higher rate than the national population. somewhere around four times the number they actually represent. >> kimberly: dana. >> greg: i don't think it's true. i looked it up. legal or illegal, not linked to crime spikes. the illegal population tripled but crime decline 48%. murder rate. >> eric: on the federal level. >> greg: that's what i'm doing. >> eric: i will send you the info. >> greg: i got mine from an independent source. maybe the brain room has a different source than i do. the uva rape was false but it fit into a liberal feminist narrative which is why it was

widely reported and accepted. you have the argument that whether or not it's false, it doesn't matter because it's true somewhere else. that's what they always use. do your point of why it happened, romantic progressive ideals won over common sense pair they were allowed to take to 18-year-old mixed in with young girls because they couldn't speak english. they couldn't go to a higher grade. they fact let's help them when in fact, without seeing with common sense that this was a bad idea. >> kimberly: there's a huge problem in terms of why are they entitled to get the education at the risk of public safety and at the expense, of personal safety, of young kids. >> dana: might be a law that has to be revisited. 19 19 engine, the supreme court decided based on a resource issue, in that case, in 1982, the supreme court said there would be more harm if yout educate them.

that's why these school districts do that. i don't think it's appropriate to put 18-year-olds and with freshman but i imagine as a resource standpoint, where else are they going to put them? they have to be in remedial english. there's all sorts of problems paid because of the publicity on sanctuary cities, when you look at president trump and the push he's made, the movement is against sanctuary. the governor of maryland, larry hogan, has said that if the state of maryland sends him a bill about making it a sanctuary state, he would veto it. you saw mayors in florida saying were not going to do it anymore. there's actually a movement against sanctuary which will probably grow. >> kimberly: i am against sanctuary schools. if you're coming in illegally and you shouldn't be there and they should have been deported, that's where they go. go back to school wherever you came from and don't make it an obligation, taxpayer expense and public safety expense. >> bob: montgomery county,

probably the most liberal county. not surprising that they downplayed it. very little local coverage, i might add. should have gotten coverage bridge should be covered by the mainstream media, as you call it. it should be covered by a lot of people because rape is rape, whether it's done by people who are citizens of this country or not. it's a plague on our country and it should be reported. >> kimberly: i had, new york city's far left mayor has just ordered schools to block immigration enforcement officias from entering. bill de blasio's very bad decision next. my insurance rates are probably gonna double. but dad, you've got... ...allstate. with accident forgiveness they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. indeed. it's good to be in, good hands.

>> greg: in a press conference tuesday, new york city mayor bill de blasio announced his deputies will block i.c.e. agents from entering public schools. how will he block these nonexistent invaders? good? he brags about denying entry and musters a warrant. which is how things work.

it's an official medical diagnosis, de blasio is dumber than 6 pounds of dead flounder. no offense to dead fish. the mayor asked the hero as he fails to protect us from real threats like criminally stupid mayors. de blasio isn't just dumb, he's dangerous and tries to hide it with cheap press conferences. last week, and ex-con ran down a medic and her own ambulance. she left behind five children. the deranged killer had 31 arrests. assault, robbery, weapons charges. but a judge appointed by the mayor had the chance to hold this maniac but let him go. free to murder a mom. while the mayor fakes compassion, his bumbling, incoherent policies turn innocents into sitting ducks for mad men.

the threat isn't from immigration agents. it's from progressive punks who put politics before safety. in new york, mad men can roam free and even become mayor. i don't like this person. i don't. when is somebody at this table going to run for mayor? it's either you or eric. you would wipe the floor with this mop. >> kimberly: i would make him cry for his mother so fast. you have no idea. >> greg: this is all grandstanding. i am the heroic guy. he doesn't protect. >> kimberly: we have all been in new york for a while. you see the difference from when bloomberg was mayor, giuliani turned out. is shameful. wait. it's not nice. it's a mess.

we never get the snow plowed. all the garbage isn't collected. i got the joke but enough is enough. be mature. do your job. don't discriminate on people you think didn't vote for you and earn the job of being mayor. he wants to run for reelection. what exactly has he done? hasn't made the place safer. police department is in more allies. >> bob: he did purposely not plow your neighborhood. started off in poor neighborhoods. >> kimberly: do them all. >> bob: what is wrong with having to have a warrant to go into school? >> greg: you should. definitely. i agree with you on that. the point is, that is standard procedure. he wasn't saying anything new. we all know you need a warrant. >> dana: local p.r. purposes. people in new york thinking oh, i.c.e. is going to come into the schools and take away children? know, no one said that was going to happen.

this happens a lot in our discourse, not just in that issue but it helps him nationally with the left. he's got a big election coming up. he probably wants a future in the democratic party. >> eric: is there a future in the democratic party for him? at what level and where? kimberly against hillary? that would be amazing. >> greg: guil versus hill. >> kimberly: what a deal. >> greg: lets agree he is the worst mayor who roam the planet. i include john mayer in that. "one more thing" is up next.

growing up, we were german. we danced in a german dance group. i wore lederhosen. when i first got on ancestry i was really surprised that i wasn't finding all of these germans in my tree. i decided to have my dna tested through ancestry dna. the big surprise was we're not german at all. 52% of my dna comes from scotland and ireland. so, i traded in my lederhosen for a kilt. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story. get started for free at ancestry.com.

it'that can make a worldces, of difference. expedia, everything in one place, so you can travel the world better.

>> dana: time fo"one more thing," a special one. >> kimberly: today is national puppy day. i found these puppies. they are mine. they are brothers and they belong to me and ronan. they are should sue poodles. they are brothers. they are super cute. i'm going to show you. this is mario and luigi. video made of them.

one of their best friends, luigi was riding around in a mercedes-benz. they seemed to like it. they are hipster. they are the super mario brothers. >> dana: super cute. >> kimberly: they are not four months yet. >> dana: now it's your turn. >> kimberly: aren't they the cutest things you've ever seen? >> eric: tonight, 8:00, a special live addition of "the o'reilly factor." sean spicer. he had a press conference at 1:45 today and a lot of news happened after 2:30 three we will sit down. >> dana: spicer was funny today. >> kimberly: look at mario. >> dana: greg, do you want to hold a dog?

>> greg: no thanks. my first podcast is up. it is called "the one." the topic, we talk about gorsuch, his bladder. i'm going to ban a phrase. this word is how you are able to imply a fact without actually being right. suggest. i've been noticing this on other networks. evidence suggesting collusion or the leaks suggest surveillance. >> eric: origins put a question mark at the end of the comment. >> dana: last night i went to a retirement dinner for terry lundgren, who is retiring as the ceo of macy's. it was a beautiful event. anna wintour was there. this is the best part, watching

his, what he's planning to do after retirement. dedicated to young people. it made me think. you do that exercise, what would you want people to say in your obituary? it's better to think about what you would want people to say at your retirement party. it >> greg: same thing. >> dana: while, your colleagues and the people you're trying to help. congratulations to him and his lovely wife. see if i look at the difference this is making for bob. >> bob: nice stuff. pope francis is known as somebody who relates to children very, very well. this is what happened the other day. there it is. took his cap right off, smiled and laughed and put it back on. >> greg: disappearing cap. >> dana: these dogs are

beautiful. congratulations. mario and luigi. >> kimberly: ronan wants to keep them together. >> dana: that's it for us. "special report" is next. >> this is a fox news alert. welcome to a busy washington. i am bret baier. vote counting chaos on capitol hill. high-stakes vote to dismantle obamacare plan for today has been postponed. the house leadership and the trump administration did not have enough yeses. president trump spent the day trying to get conservative republican lawmakers to get ds on the american health care act but a short time ago, the chairman of the house freedom caucus said the votes are just not there. what now? vote tomorrow? president trump's agenda could hang in the balance. we have fox team coverage.