"hannity" ." he is up next. >> sean: welcome to "hannity," a lot to get to tonight. we'll be joined by guests but over the weekend, cbs veteran journalist ted koppel said i, yours truly, sean hannity and bad for america. that's a pretty severe charge and one that deserves a response. and that is tonight's opening monologue. this all started three weeks ago when i agreed to do an interview with cbs sunday morning and their special contributor ted koppel. the interview lasted well over 45 minutes and we discussed in great detail why they're such a great divide in america and politics and the media.

in my honest opinion, the exchange was actually a very good take. and worthwhile for any audience to see. here is all that cbs sunday morning decided to air. take a look. >> honestly, i think liberalism has to be defeated. socialism has to be defeated in a political sense. we don't want a revolution -- >> what more do you want? you've got the white house come, house and senate. >> and then we have angry snowflakes and a media out to the president they know the difference between opinion and news. you are cynical. look at you. >> i am cynical. >> to think i am bad for america? >> i do. in the long haul, i think these opinions -- >> that is sad, ted.

>> you know why? you are very good at what you do and you have attracted a significantly more -- >> with all due respect, i am listening. >> you have attracted people who are determined that ideology is more important than facts. >> sean: wow. he's kind of calling me a liar and then saying you and all these opinion shows -- he is giving hints opinion. only 70 seconds ended up airing. i guess people like ted koppel feel you, the american people, cannot distinguish between opinion and news. that's like obama. people cling to their god, guns and religion. ignorant, irredeemable deploy roles -- hillary clinton said that. it is a flagrant example of what i call edited fake news. remember "cbs news" is the

former home of dan rather. he was forced to resign after reporting and inflammatory fake news story about president george w. bush, rather used fake documents to bolster his story. the former home of cheryl atkinson, she was marginalized at cbs and stonewalled. they would not show a lot of her investigative journalism into president obama and his administration. is that agenda driven? now they produce a package, although prominently displaying their dishonesty, bias and total hypocrisy here for every viewer to see. ted's interview with me he was not about substance or getting my real opinion. the story was written long before he walked into this studio here at fox. i was just used as a prop to advance his narrative which is why only one minute and ten seconds out of the 45-50 minutes was actually used. in other words, it was one minute and that is the one minute that fit into their narrative. that is edited fake news.

by the way, other networks played the same game and have for many years. now it's time to expose this for what it really is. i have the ability to fight back. cheap shot attacks in the name of journalism all to advance their bias agenda. what tied with really asking was this -- our opinion shows bad for america? he thinks they are. meanwhile, ted was giving his opinion. he considers himself an impartial journalist but he was airing exactly what he said was bad for america. right here on this show, on "hannity," i expressed my opinion because i am a talk show host and an advocacy journalist, if you will. ted koppel thinks he is down the middle. fair and balanced. a real journalist. you're not a journalist. you are very hypocritical here. have you ever said for example you are working for cbs -- did you ever say that george w. bush, the attack by dan rather was bad for america? did you ever say cbs -- when

they spiked cheryl atkinson's story -- that that was bad for america? but the head of news and that division happened to be the brother of ben rhodes, the high-ranking official for than president obama? is that a conflict of interest? i am willing to look at my body of work and compare it with "cbs news" any day of the week. did cbs news even one time ever asked president obama about his relationship with an unrepentant terrorist where he started his political career? i did cbs's job. i did it for you, ted. did you ever delve deep into what black liberation theology is into how it motivated obama for over 20 years? the church of gd america? the church of american chickens have come home to roost? after eight years of obama, did cbs ever show the numbers on the screen there? about what a failure the obama presidency was?

i put those up on the screen on a regular basis. by the way, i did mention this to you. you edited all out. did cbs ever put up all the laws hillary clinton likely violated so she could avoid congressional oversight? that they expose all the benghazi lives of hillary clinton? we did on this program. did cbs cover in great detail how members of the media colluded with the clinton campaign in this election cycle? we did here. how much time did cbs devote to this phony russian conspiracy story even though after eight months there is not a shred of evidence? that is the difference ted, between me and you. i'm honest with my audience. i don't pretend that i am fair and balanced and objective. you do. if you really cared about truth and journalism, how can you work for a network that only tells one side of the story? how can i be bad for america when i'm offering the american people news and information

lately that it your own network will not touch because they have an agenda? now, ted, i happen to be very proud of the work i do. i am proud of the teams we have built here that work really hard every day to bring this audience news and information that well, frankly, the rest of the media ignores. i hope you enjoyed your press coverage this weekend and covering how proud i am for america. while editing out 99% of what i said. what you really did is prove my point, that i am right. you exposed yourself as agenda driven, opinionated, hypocritical and you proved my point i've been saying since 2007-2008. journalism is dead in america and we have an information crisis in this country. ted, if you end cbs and cbs news have the courage, release the entire unedited footage of the interview. let america decide. let america see the 99% that you did not want to air.

joining us now with reaction, michelle malkin. i will tell you why they're not going to release the tape, michelle. because -- so, ted asked the first question. i give the answer. none of that is going to air. that's what he said. then, why am i sitting here? >> that ted koppel imitation is good. dispute the lack >> sean: throughout the rest of the interview i was provoking him. are you going to cut this out, ted? who does an interview and says that's not airing? well, then why am i here? that is why they don't want people to see this fake -- what these networks do in edit rooms, they have gotten away with for years. that is my point. i want to get yours. >> yes. i have to raise a toast to you, big brother, for exposing these

walking dead liberal decrepit elitist. i think it was deathly worth your time to do this interview because although they played just one little sliver of a look at what you have been able to expose. i think that has them running scared. i would love to see the twitter hashtag i know you have a huge twitter army out there, i do as well -- #releasethehannitytapes. this is a very teachable moment in liberal media history. you have this ancient gatekeeper, ted koppel telling you -- wagging her finger that you, sean hannity are bad for america while he, ted koppel and all of his fourth estate colleagues are the ones who can be entrusted with delivering the proper amount of news and opinion to america. we are the ones who support diversity. true diversity in the media

marketplace. these people are the enemy a diversity and thought. the enemies of true transparency in the vibrant marketplace in the media. shame on them. >> sean: they had a monopoly all these years and by the way, this is not personal between me and ted koppel. i did it because -- i loved when he was covering on "nightline," america held hostage. i do not think i missed an episode because it was really imperative, important work. when those hostages were released, it was such a good moment for our country. so, it is not personal. the thing is, there is a level of sanctimony here. it reminds me of obama clinging to gods, guns, religion. he redeemable the portables. that the american people are not smart enough to ascertain what his opinion and what is news. i don't think americans would doubt that i am a conservative. i think i make it clear on a nightly basis. is there any shock there? >> of course not.

the other thing you have done is expose the double standards. here you are asking them to release the full interviews so that people can judge the totality of the interview and the substance of what you said. these are the same media people who if conservative investigative independent journalists used their tactics, used their techniques that they are supposedly time-honored and entrusted to be able to use in telling a story, for example, editing and interview, they hated. wait, we want you, the conservative journalist -- they are always demanding he released every last second of what he has done because he cannot be trusted. but they can? come on. look at the whole entire history of liberal media ideology being more important than facts. ted koppel, you already mentioned dan rather -- manufactured documents in pursuit of an ideological

agenda. bringing george w. bush down. the entire trump campaign -- come >> sean: i want to hear him say dan rather is bad for america. do you think those words ever come flying out of his mouth? i doubt it. up next, tonight, right here in "hannity"... >> we cannot be chasing the perfect all the time. sometimes you have to take the good and put it in your pocket and take the win. >> sean: reince priebus reacted to the republican health care bill being pulled on friday. we have reaction from corey lewandowski and geraldo rivera. david clarke and larry elder weigh in on the trump administration being surveilled. ann coulter will delve into the dangers of spring break. that's all tonight a meeting? it's a big one. too bad. we are double booked: diarrhea and abdominal pain. why don't you start without me? oh. yeah. if you're living with frequent,

unpredictable diarrhea and abdominal pain, you may have irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. a condition that can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi, a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage both diarrhea and abdominal pain at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have or may have had: pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a blockage of your bowel or gallbladder. if you are taking viberzi, you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d... with viberzi.

[ sighs ] hey, i was using that. what, you think we own stock in the electric company? i will turn this car around right now! there's nobody back there. i was becoming my father. [ clears throat ] it's...been an adjustment, but we're making it work. you know, progressive.com makes it easy for us to get the right home insurance. [ snoring ] progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, but we can protect your home and auto. [ chuckles ] all right. with advil, you'll ask what sinus headache? what stiff joints? what time of the month cramps? what nighttime pain?

make all your pains a distant memory with advil the world's #1 choice what pain? advil.

>> we cannot be chasing the perfect all the time. sometimes you have to take the good and put it in your pocket and take the win. the president met with over 120 members of the house, there is more love shown to outside groups by this white house, whether it was vice president pence, stephen bannon, myself, the point is, the diverse group of people working the halls of congress including the leadership in congress, i think

it's time for our folks to come together and i also think it's time to potentially get a few moderate democrats on board as well. >> sean: that was reince priebus yesterday reacting to the republican health care bill that was pulled late last week. over the weekend the president tweeted... okay, joining us with reaction, corey lewandowski and geraldo rivera. geraldo, i think this is going to get done. that is my strong belief here. the second thing is, i have a different take than the white house at this point. that is -- there is probably blame to go around. nobody, not one person, geraldo, saw that bill that was being scored in the cbo until they released it. there is no consensus bill that everybody supported. you have different factions in the republican and democratic party.

you've got moderate scum of the sunday group, the wednesday group. the freedom caucus, this wasn't seen before hand. this should have been built behind the seat, they at eight long years to do it, geraldo. >> i agree with that last point, they had eight years, they should have gotten this done. you are the most prominent conservative commentator in our country, sean. no, you have to cop to the fact that this so-called freedom caucus -- they have a three word slogan. it just say no. they were not going to go along with this president no matter what this bill contained. they stabbed him in the back, he had a chance here where the republican speaker of the house and everybody in the trump administration, the president of the united states invested in a compromise that was going to

save the federal deficit to the tune of a quarter of a trillion dollars over time. they were fighting for those who were cut off, but still they were saving money, had a reasonable compromise, the freedom caucus would not have -- >> sean: reince priebus is right, nobody's no bill is per. nobody's going to be completely right. had they built the consensus before they rolled out the bill, they would have known the votes that they had. by the way, the president gets all the credit. he did compromise, he did something for the freedom caucus -- then he would do something for the moderates, people would leave. that should have been handled by the speaker, leadership. the president did way too much heavy lifting on this bill. he is the executive branch, they are the l cory. >> they should have never had an official deadline to get this

bill accomplished when it was not necessary to be done in the first 60 days. i understand the budget reconciliation process but they were concerned with what the senate was going to do before they got the house bill done. you brought numbers and from the tuesday group, the republican study committee, the heritage foundation. all of the stakeholders who will look at this bill before it is released, compromise behind the scenes. if you can have a basic framework behind the scenes before it's introduced to everybody, that's the way to go. look, you could take marco rubio for his word or not when it came to the gang of eight. he spent countless hours talking about his legislation before it was ever introduced. it was ultimately a failure but he tried to get those troops on board first. >> sean: i am convinced but geraldo, all i'm saying is, why did they set themselves up by keeping it hidden -- not sharing it with any of the coalition --

releasing it, creating a public civil war and public fight when it should have been handled behind closed doors? those compromises could have been made and this is probably the way it will happen from here on in, you cannot blame people if they have strong principles. nobody wants this repeal and replace more than i do. i want the win for the president. he worked hard for this and he will get it. you've got to have the leadership handle it better. >> i absolutely disagree, sean. i think that the freedom caucus would not have gone along with any compromise whatsoever that involved giving something for free to poor people. they are the just say no people. what has the freedom caucus done but said no? they voted 50 times to repeal or more -- >> sean: it's meaningless if you don't pass up. >> eight years later, where are they now? now they have to say no to a republican president.

>> sean: sean hannity is saying this. cory is right. bring in all of these conservative think tanks, bring in the senate because he had to deal with culture and reconciliation, bring in all of the different factions with the moderates and the tuesday group, the caucus. everyone needs to get locked in a room and don't let them out till they fix it. they owe it to the american people to fulfill that promise and they owe it to the president to do their job. coming up, david clarke and larry elder to weigh in on the trump campaign being surveilled. also tonight... >> the american people are not happy with the results. they know that when cities and states refuse to help enforce immigration law, our great nation is less safe. >> sean: calling out cities to enforce immigration law. in other words, sanctuary cities. ann coulter will join us with reaction. still to come tonight, we went down to south padre island,

texas. more shocking behavior. is this it dangerous for your children?re spring break. we will check in with ainsley earhardt, she will have reactional. or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis. when a fire destroyed the living room. we were able to replace everything in it. liberty did what? liberty mutual paid to replace all of our property that was damaged. and we didn't have to touch our savings. yeah, our insurance won't do that. well, there goes my boat. you can leave worry behind

when liberty stands with you™. liberty stands with you™ liberty mutual insurance

c'mohappy birthday! i survived a heart attack. i'm doing all i can to keep from having another one. and i'm taking brilinta. for people who've been hospitalized for a heart attack. i take brilinta with a baby aspirin. no more than one hundred milligrams as it affects how well it works. brilinta helps keep my platelets from sticking together and forming a clot. brilinta reduced the chance of another heart attack. or dying from one. it worked better than plavix. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor since stopping it too soon increases your risk of clots in your stent, heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily, or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers, a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. tell your doctor about bleeding, new or unexpected shortness of breath, any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. talk to your doctor about brilinta. i'm doing all i can. that includes brilinta.

if you can't afford your medication, astra zeneca may be able to help. >> live it from america's news headquarters in new york, here is what is happening. democrats calling on devin nunes to recuse himself from the committees russia inquiry. they are upset that devin nunes who received intelligence from a source on white house grounds told president trump about it before sharing it with committee members. he claims he did nothing wrong but democrats say it makes them question his ability to run an independent investigation. president trump himself it's firing back this evening, tweeting...

that's the news this hour. now, back to "hannity" ." >> sean: welcome back to "hannity" ." calling out democrats for criticizing the house intelligence head of committee, devin nunes collecting intel on the trump transition team. take a look. >> my is chairman nunes briefed the president about the russian investigation. if that is a big deal, we have sunk to a new low. at the commander-in-chief cannot be briefed by the chairperson of the house until committee on a matter that has nothing to do with the fbi investigation, than i do not know what they can talk about. he is the commander-in-chief. >> sean: that is not all, the democrats were up in arms

because it was revealed the chairman nunes met with his source on the white house grounds but a spokesman for chairman nunes said he met with his source at the white house grounds in order to have proximity to a secure location where he could view the information provided by the source. makes sense. joining us now with reaction, milwaukee county sheriff david clarke. and larry elder. larry, let me check in with your legal mind for a second. can you think of any circumstances under which a president-elect or candidate should ever be surveilled? >> i cannot think of anyone and i think what we are finding out is that donald trump was not out to lunch when he tweeted that he may have been wiretapped. i would be a lot more impressed if some of these democrats yelling and screaming about devin nunes if they were saying that loretta lynch should have

recused herself when she met with bill clinton on the tarmac, something that she never did. i would be a little more impressed if they were angry with hillary during the benghazi hearing and giving us a bunch of different stories and for deleting documents, destroying evidence after they were under subpoena. i'd be a lot more impressed at the democrats were upset with those kinds of things but they are not. this is nothing more than politics. they know that they are in trouble because donald trump is looking at least credible and so let's put the chairman on trial. that's what they're doing right now. >> sean: one of the things that bothered me the most is the chairman saying, sheriff, this was widely disseminated. a lot of people saw this. that goes into the issue of privacy, even if it was legitimate surveillance. i think that is a question that needs to be answered. let's say it was legitimate surveillance and you pick up a president-elect or a candidate. that should never be widely disseminated. right? >> look, this is unprecedented.

especially for an incoming president. the fact that nunes briefed the president on this -- that's what he should have done. a mistake he made was releasing this to the public. he wanted a few have light wow headlines and face time with the media. that kind of backfired but the bigger issue here as larry indicated is why the intelligence sources and agencies are surveilling the incoming president and his transition team -- for what? it's a shame that the intelligence agency directors could not go to the president-elect and tell him what was going on. maybe somebody should have leaked it to him. not leaking any information or names. this is -- as larry indicated, politics as usual. the partisan back-and-forth at the american people are tired of. we sent donald trump to

washington to drain the swamp and to get rid of this back-and-forth stuff with politics, it does nothing for the american people. get down to the business of serving the american people on the issues facing this country. >> sean: i have a lot of questions here, larry. did they use under the guise of legitimate intelligence gathering, legitimate surveillance, was that a ruse to really surveilled the president? the next logical question after that is who knew what, where, and one? did the president know at the time? was any of that's shared with the clinton campaign? where are these leaks coming from? the only felonies we know in this case were committed by leaking intelligence. that's a violation of the espionage act. james comey would not even acknowledge there was an investigation into this although he did acknowledge the investigation into russia even though there is no evidence that has been put forth whatsoever. >> i think it was reince priebus

who said there's greater evidence of media collusion to get hillary elected dan russia getting trump elective. there's a whole lot we do not know. i would urge all people to relax, look at the evidence that will come in and find out -- james clapper, said so far, there's no evidence whatsoever with any kind of collusion. that's ultimately what i think is going to happen. >> sean: if you were doing an investigation -- don't you keep that circle tight in terms of evidence that you are gathering? isn't that the type of thing you would never let out and if it was left out, you would be able to very quickly determine who did it? >> the secrecy of these investigations is paramount. i get briefed on these things all the time, sean. you're not going to find barack obama's fingerprints on this. but he is all over this. he is not stupid enough to be involved in any of the conversation -- might not be

able to prove this but he knew what was going on. i put myself in this position. if something was going on in milwaukee county, and somebody did not tell me about it, i would not be real happy about i it. it's one of those things that will never be worked back towards the former president but he is all over this thing. >> sean: i agree with that analysis. and you never know. maybe somebody will talk. up next, tonight, right here on "hannity." >> the american people are not happy with these results. they know that when cities and states refuse to help enforce immigration law our nation is less safe. >> sean: jeff sessions speaking about the need for sanctuary cities to abide by federal laws. ann coulter weighs in. that's coming up next. >> i was in jail because i got in a beach brawl and i got too damn drunk. >> sean: "hannity" investigation as we went down to

south padre island. what's really going on with your kids at spring break. ainsley earhardt will join us with a full report about the dangers your kids are facing. that straight ahead. exxonmobil s are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here. all while reducing america's emissions. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ is it keeps the food out. for me before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. just a few dabs is clinically proven to seal out more food particles. super poligrip is part of my life now.

ltry align probiotic.n your digestive system? for a non-stop, sweet treat goodness, hold on to your tiara kind of day. get 24/7 digestive support, with align. the #1 doctor recommended probiotic brand. also in kids chewables. >> sean: welcome back to "hannity." during the white house press briefing, jeff sessions addressed sanctuary cities and the harm they have caused the country. watch this. >> the department of justice has a duty to enforce our nation's laws in including our immigration laws.

to promptly remove aliens when they are convicted or detained of certain crimes. unfortunately some states and cities have adopted policies designed to frustrate this enforcement of immigration law. this includes refusing to detain known felons, or otherwise failing to comply with these laws. the american people are not happy with these results. they know that when cities and states refuse to help enforce immigration law, our nation is less safe. >> sean: here with reaction, ann coulter. why do i bet you do not care about the health care repeal and replace issue -- you want immigration vetting of refugees -- those are your top issues and you think that should be the number one priority? >> i did care about obamacare and i think it is a complete

disaster. i have a simple plan to fix it which i will be launching in my column on wednesday. even a republican congressman could understand, so simple. very easy to fix. i don't hold trump responsible for that. i do want trump and these republicans in congress to enforce the trump agenda, instead -- we are getting a lot of the standard g.o.p. corporatist agenda. this claim that they are going to go to tax cuts next. as you know, i would like taxes cut. as you know, i am very pro-life. i'm about at the point that i want taxis to go up and planned parenthood funded if this is all the republicans are giving us. under bush, we had massive tax cuts. corporations were happy. they did not hire americans. they hired illegal aliens.

so i'm not sure this argument that cutting the taxes on corporations will lead to all these jobs. it leads to jobs as limiting the supply of labor by building a wall -- you want an infrastructure project? it reduces the number of welfare cases, it helps you with medicaid and medicare. doing what trump set on immigration makes everything else we have to do so much easier. >> sean: you don't want immigrants competing for jobs especially when you have 95 million americans out of the labor force but if you bringing trillions of repatriation money that's going to incentivize them to have money -- same with corporate taxes -- you lower it to 15%, businesses are going to want to do business here. that only helps us too, right? >> may be, i'm not very inclined to worry about corporate america right now.

that's all anybody has worried about. the whole point of trump was worrying about the working class. as i say -- jobs they created under bush, no, they brought in guestworkers. they demanded an amnesty. >> sean: we are not disagreeing. >> i would also say that having seen that we are going to be living under -- in fact we are going to live under fascism with trump, our natural federal dist court judges, as long as they are going to be deciding all of our immigration policy for us -- i think the first law congress at the passes take trumps immigration policy paper and pass every provision into law. almost everything he has promised on immigration already is the law, 100% within the prerogative -- >> sean: why would you advise

him to -- >> because everything he wants to do is his responsibility as the president. for example, to build the wall. as commander-in-chief, it's not just the law -- it's the constitution. but apparently some federal district judges need more than the constitution. they will ignore the constitution. why not have congress for one thing, just for supplemental support on all of trumps immigration policies passed, pass all of those into law and also force the democrats and some of those weak need republicans to vote against it -- what reince priebus said this weekend, the new white house plan is to appeal to democrats. look, trump is a charming person. i'm sure he will be lovely to them but instead of trying to get democrat votes by giving into them, by pushing socialist ideas -- the way you get democrats to vote for your bills

is by writing bills that they cannot vote against because they have to stand for reelection. as you will see with my obamacare fix this wednesday. >> sean: ann coulter. they want to destroy trump. they don't want to support him. thank you for being with us. up next, tonight, right here on "hannity"... >> i don't remember the last three days because i've been so [bleep] up. >> sean: we went to south padre island, texas to see what your kids are doing on spring break. things haven't changed. you will not believe what we saw. ainsley earhardt joins us with a full report, straight ahead. awww. try this. for minor arthritis pain, only aleve is fda approved to work for up to 12 straight hours with just one pill. thank you. come on everybody. aleve.

live whole. not part.

i provide for my family. i will use my education to help my community. i will inspire our next generation of leaders. i am a college student, but i am only 1%.

only 1% of college students are american indian. donate now, and help our numbers grow. ♪

>> sean: welcome back to "hannity." it's that time of year again. thousands of young adults had to tropical destinations all across the u.s. for a little fun in the sun but what are your kids really up to when they jet off to spring break that you end up paying for? ainsley earhardt went down to panama city beach florida in 2015 to investigate the dangers of spring break and what we found was beyond shocking. after our reporting aired two years ago, the local government passed a series of ordinances to curtail the risky behavior. including banning all alcohol on the beach in the month of march. we sent a producer to another spring break hot spot, south padre island. you've got to be warned here, what you are about to see is

beyond graphic. probably not appropriate for your kids. three, two, one. go. >> i do not remember the last three days because i've been so [bleep] up. >> what time did you all start drinking today? >> one hour ago. but like seven shots in 7 minutes. we are good. ♪ >> oh, god. i saw some guy do drugs off some girl. it was pretty crazy. >> that with you on me. >> [laughs] >> spring break!

♪ >> this is called slapping the bag. >> it is so weird down here. you never know what you are going to get into. >> spring break, 2017, baby! >> i love you. >> we have seen so much dancing, dude. >> mom and dad, i love you. ♪

>> what time did i start drinking today? like 11:00. >> drink beer. >> i honestly have no idea. i really do not know. >> spring break, 2017! >> sean: here with reaction, ainsley earhardt. you've been down there a number of years for us doing this. you saw a lot of bad things. it's often obviously happening. not as much in panama city beach. >> there's a new sheriff in tow town. he was elected in the fall and took over in january. i just talked to him. the numbers are not back for this year's spring break because it is still going on.

they looked through the entire month of march but they have changed the rules. the big one is no alcohol on the beach. >> sean: we are hated for doing this. >> hated. but he said loved by the community. his officers would walk out on the beach and families come up to them and say thank you so much for cleaning up the beach. we are bringing our families back. that's generating the economy again. he's pleased with that. it's not perfect, they had a really bad day yesterday. two shootings yesterday. one person is in critical condition and one robbery. they have banned balcony climbing. remember when we were down there? people were jumping from balcony to balcony and falling off and dying. >> sean: everyone of of these kids are wasted, hammered. >> that is their goal. to get blacked out drunk. they increased the penalty for open containers. no parking lot drinking and you can't buy any alcohol between the hours of 2:00-7:00 a.m. >> sean: they are paying to send their kids here.

people, the 100-mile group. coming in with homemade drugs, molly, ecstasy, cocaine. marijuana obviously. you do not know who these people are. they're here to pray on -- >> they prey on the college kids. they are much older. they robbed them of their backpacks and their belongings on the beach. nobody even knows notices becay are so drunk. >> sean: thank you for this report. you interviewed eric and laura trump. >> we got the name of the baby -- while the name they are thinking about. >> sean: wondered they tell the president question marks because they found out on eric's birthday, the beginning of january. they told his family inauguration day. they were at the white house. the very first night that the

family moved in and took over. they were sitting at the dining room table and that's when they shared the news. they said their family was so chaotic -- it shut everyone down and they all just went crazy. >> sean: you also asked them about ted koppel and me? >> it will air tomorrow. >> sean: i know you are not going to give me any clips. i got it. >> he was very calm entry of you. >> sean: okay, that is fair. i will be up at 6:00. >> she doesn't even look pregnant. and she's in her third trimeste trimester. it's very special. they have had a great year. >> sean: we will see you back here tomorrow with more news on spring break. when we come back, an important question of the day and yes, we will play some of those mean, hateful voice mails you left me on the "hannity" hotline. that is straight ahead.

>> announcer: the question of the day is brought to you by

hyundai. >> sean: time for the question of the day. do you think cbs should post the full 50-plus minutes of my interview with ted koppel online? go to facebook.com/seanhannity, @seanhannity. let us know what you think. time to play some of your mean messages for me left on the hannity hotline. hit me with your best shot. >> sean, don't listen to these crazy people telling you to use that axle grease in your hair. your hair looks great. don't listen to those morons. >> you are terrific and i appreciate your commentary but you rustle the papers that you're holding when you're talking to your guests. if you could please stop doing that, it interrupts the flow of the conversation, hearing the papers rattling. thank you. >> sean: really? my hair, ruffling papers. i will make amends. i am open to constructive criticism. no more of that. have something you want to say

to me? can be mean as you want, nice if you want, doesn't matter. call 877-225-8587. that's all the time we have left this evening. as always, thank you for being with us. we will see you back here tomorrow night. >> bill: "the o'reilly factor" is on tonight. >> i strongly urge our nation's states, cities, counties, to consider carefully the harms they are doing to their citizens by refusing to enforce immigration law. >> bill: the hammer is dropping on sanctuary cities, as the federal government says it will deny funding to them in a variety of ways. tonight, we'll spell it all out. >> we'll end up with a truly great health care bill in the future after this mess known as obamacare explodes. >> bill: health care chaos is hurting you, the loyal americanu we'll tell you how. >> you have attracted people who are determined that ideology is more important than facts. >> bill: also, ahead, sean hannity demanding that ted