bill o'reilly stops everything, he is doing just to watch it on saturdays you should too. thanks for watching a special edition of the factor, he'll be back monday, always remember i am waters and this is my world. >> tucker: the left is on the attack this evening, across the country they're demanding that immigration law no longer apply in schools, hospitals, or churches. meanwhile a college student was published by a professor using the m word, mankind. first in washington, democrats continuing to pound on the house intelligence chairman devin nunes, accusing him of being aoc stooge, white house press secretary at sean spicer blasted the password vilifying him while ignoring the substance of that

story, here's part of s it. >>. you seem to be really focusd on who showed up where, to answere. your question, yes it's appropriate for a member of congress to contact someone who was contacted him according to some of these reports. i don't know the answer to that you're asking me is it appropriate for a member of congress to come over here. he wasn't hiding or roaming, he was asked to come over here by an individual he came over which happens daily. heby was asked to go somewhere,e went there, he was clear. nothing that was inappropriate exactly the opposite. what he did, what he saw, who he met with was 100% proper. >> the question is why is the press focused on what nunes did not not he revealed? congressman thanks for coming o on. here's what i think the chairman of the intel committee is telling us, i want to put on the

screen for viewers who haven't been following us. he says there are dozens of documents gathered by the intelligence agencies with information about trump officials. these documents were not related to russia or the investigation into russia. whileruss many of these reportsd redact the identities within them but they were written in ways that would be clear, at least one instance a trump officials other than mr. flynn, he was out right identified. these documents circulated at the highest levels of government. to sum g up, it looks like prety clear at least with the chairman of the intel committee is telling us, the obama administration spied on the trump transition and campaign, why is it not a big deal? >> i would be very careful about throwing around that accusation, there is no evidence of that. if there is, we should have it out in the open for all to see.g but it shouldn't get in the way of the very serious investigation of what the russians were doing and ioi

election. >> tucker: i'm not going to let you to move on to russia before answering the question. w the chairman of the house intelligence committee said he saw this week documents collected by the obama administration'sma intelligence agencies that pertain it to the donald trump and his associates, are you saying he's lying about that to those documents exist? how do you respond to that? >> i think it's very difficult to know what he's saying, you see in the of senior republican republicans, most people don't d really take the chairman very seriously right now. the problem is not that he's being a partisan, the question is whether he is competent and impartial. to get straight to the white house and say so many contradictory things, he doesn't help his credibility. i was on the w senior staff -- >> tucker: i know you've been in and around government a while, he said things that are

not just of concern to republicans, of goods or to any one who lives in this country. it >> if there is evidence that the obama administration spied on the trump campaign. let's have it. let's also do with full of the estes geisha. >> tucker: we already have. >> there is no evidence of that. >> tucker: general flynn, everyone who thinks of him, we conversation that he had with the russian official was recorded in leaked illegally. he was l destroyed by it, that'a crime, no? >> i'm very glad you mentioned that. we do know there was an investigation going on, the fbi director has told us they are investigating collusion between the trump campaign and the russians.ut we do know that michael flynn was talking to the senior russian spy in the u.s. and buy the product. that's why president trump fired him. that's why he's under threat of criminal prosecution and seeking immunity. that's very, veryg different. that's called an investigation.

>> tucker:r: and thanks for clarifying, i want to make w totally clear what you're saying, you're saying it's okay for an intelligence agency to listen to an american citizen, transcribed the conversation which isis classified and then link it to the press. that's a, are you going to take a breath to at least acknowledge is a crime it wrong? >> you don't know that a crime has been committed. the fact is there are legal ways for the fbi and the course of a counterintelligence operation and investigation to lawfully examine the communication of americans with foreign nationals like ambassador kinsley act. that's not spying, that's called enforcing the law. >> tucker: we've been through this before, you're willfully ignoring what i'm asking. is it okay to make that information public? you know as well as i do that is not.

why just lie over that rather than stop and say the obvious thing. it doesn't make what general flynn was doing right. that's why trump fired him. you should care about that too. >> tucker: there are many things that general flynn did, it made him unsuitable for that job. >> i'm glad to hear you come around that, because until recently he was a national securityhe advisor. >>t you have intelligence agencies that were operated independent from the elected officials. they were refusing to turn information to the intel committees, you are saying nothing because it suits her partisan ends. shouldn't you be raising alarm about this? >> careful, i wouldn't go maligning our intelligence professionals from other good people who are patriotic and protect our country. someone leaking classifiedat information is wrong, i agreed with you on that. i still agree with you on that.

>> tucker: you're not listening to members of your own party. as you know, adam schiff who is the ranking democrat on the intelligence committee has complained that he cannot get information pertaining to the russian investigation from the fbi, nunes says the same thing, you've seen harry reid say the same thing about the cia. in case after case, they can't get the relevant information because you can't -- >> of course it's not okay with me, thech fbi did to testify but for the committee in response to that request and has been highly responsive in the course at the senate and the and intelligence committee, having said that, let's get into wifey michael flynn is facing criminal prosecution what the heck was going on between the trump campaign on the russians. the fbi is investigating collusion it would be great if you took that seriously too. >> tucker: i do take it

seriously and in fact i have asked in a very specific way, the ranking democrat on the house intel committee to explain the question, that is the hacking of john podesta's gmail account and the democratic national committee. he said to me and i've heard sue you say many times that was done byby the putin regime. i asked him very specifically to tell me how he knows that, here's what he said, watch this. >> tucker: the government of vladimir putin was behind the hacks of the john podesta's email. >> the government was behind your you look and say eat i know you were saying john podesta's email, i have to him. you're carrying water for the kremlin. >> tucker: your member of the intel committee, >> you're going to have to move your show to our russian television.

>> tucker: that's so dumb, you're being duplicitous, did they hacked? >> that's pretty hilarious. >> when your apologist for thehe kremlin. one last time, look into the camera and say they hacked john podesta's emails, we know for the fact you can't, you know you're kent you're hiding behind weasel words. it's a really simple question congressman, do you have evidence that putin's government tax john podesta's emails, he called me a water carrier for the kremlin and tool for vladimir putin, he could notdl answer that question. i'm hardly a water carrier for putin, do you have evidence of the russian government did that? i don't think that you do. >> before you start clutching your pearls, the fact is that the fbi and our intelligence

agencies say so, that's good enough for me. it >> tucker: is, when the director of national intelligence said to the congress of the s nsa is not scooping up the email data from every american, was that good enough for you? it turns out he was lying. when the said that, maybe as a member of congress you should get actual facts before going out on a limb. >> tucker, you are the only person i know including most seen republicans on the hill white with whom i work and have a lot of respect for, you can be skeptical, but when all of the intelligence agencies and the fbi tell us that these actions were undertaken by russian actors. >> tucker: i'm asking you. have you seen any evidence at all.

>> i have been in briefings, classified and unclassified were the inclusions of the intelligence agencies, unanimous conclusions have been related to us and they are crystal clear that the russians didn't. yes. >> tucker: on the basis of what evidence commits a fair question. you're describing a collusion between the trump people and putin. i'm just asking if there anything at the bottom of this andot you're saying how dare yoe be skeptical of the intel agencies? >> don't put words in my mouth. what i said is when the entire united states intelligence committee and the fbi after months of investigation give us a unanimous conclusion, i take seriously. wondered involves trying to undermine our elections you should take it seriously t too. >> tucker: i'ms asking for the third time what is it based on. you're instead impugningur me jt as your colleague it shifted, you will want to be an answer because you don't know.

>> that's not true. the fact of the matter is i can't relate to you classified information. what i can tell you what has been publicly reported. when you look at has been publicly reported, all of the our nationalals in intelligence committee say that on thehe basis of their investigative methods which include lots of things that are sensitive i would prefer not to go into detail about, that is their conclusion. you can't deny that. the notion that we should be so skeptical of our own professionals. >> tucker: how dare i be skeptical of our ownss professionals, apparently that's you.ine with bill benny quit in response to the bite violation of the u.s. citizens, the near certainty that the agency's bite of the trump campaign, presented his campaign to congressman trey gaudi earlier this week, here's

what he said. >> that's a little broader than what my understanding is. you would have to get a warrant, you would have to get a warrant application. if you're talking form and foreign it's a separate analysis. if you're talking u.s.s. to foreign it's still a separate analysis and one that would require going to the fisa court. >> tucker: what's the truth of all this, we asked him to come back and asked when it was, thanks for coming on. >> thanks for having me. i just don't think that representative gaudi is aware of what the intelligence agencies are doing, he's been kept in the dark by those agencies. they're not telling them, even representativeness who is a member of the gang of four and the gang of eight is supposed to be exposed to everything that the intelligence community is doing including covert programs. that's why the law says on covert programs, you only need

to notify at most of the gang of eight inin congress. even nunes was a member of the gang of eight and the gang of four also didn't even know about the programs being exposed to thee conversations, the presidet is having to the members of other governments and also the conversations and other things that he was reading about people who weren't evolved in russia at all, but were involved in the trump campaign. >> tucker: the gang of four in the gang of eight are f membersf congress, they get to see the highest level of secret documents from intelligence agencies, shouldn't they know? >> that's a direct violation of the intelligence act of 1947 in 1948. they are required by those laws to notify the congress. >> tucker: the presumption that i have had and i think most

peoplehi in washington has had f one of these intelligence agencies wants to spy on an american citizen, they knew he ate a warrant. they need to go to a judge and have someone sign off on this, is that true watermark >> no. that has not been true since world war ii. in the nixon years, they were using programs called and now those same three agencies are those ones doing different programs now. namely the upstream programs i'm a representative gaudi should be asking about the fairview program it all the taps inside the united states, what are they collecting there? it's not foreign data, it's domestic. that's how the nsa analysts, its global communications being collected and stored. it wasn't foreign to anything, it's incidental bulk i acquisitn of data on everybody in the united states as well as the planet.

>> tucker: i'm confused on there's a d lot we don't know about what congressman, chairman nunes hasnd said this week, onef the things he said which was fascinatingnf was the informatin on trump and his associates was not related to the rush investigation, do you have any idea what that might mean? >> that's local communications internally in the united states, citizens and other u.s. citizens. if he's looking at the political conversations andon things like that. >> tucker: is there a legitimate reason for the u.s. the government to be collecting that information on u.s. citizens what to >> no, absolutely not, that's a violation of the fourth amendment, that's a violation of the electronic security acts, all of those things that are support to protect our privacy in the united states, we don't have it anymore, that's what i've been saying for years. >> tucker: tell us if you can in general terms of the mechanics of this. if i pick up the phone or i send an email gmail and the federal government picks up that

information how? >> basically it's by working with the companies that run the fiber-optic networks like at&t and verizon and so on. they workwi with them by installing, san francisco at&t facility that mark klein had exposed, to take off the line, it's inserting something, it's called a splitter or a y connector.r. it's like a prism where you put the fiber-optic line into one side of the prism and it splits ident duplicates it going two ways. one way go to the nsa's facility where they use various devices to take end section eyes and everything on that line. the rest of it goes down that proper channels for communication. >> tucker: it's pretty copperheads of, we put up a map i don't know if you could see it of the 38 data collection centers in the united states. a lot of people hear this and i think yeah, but there are a lot of terror threats and that's the

purpose of this surveillance is to stop those. is it to your knowledge used for other reasons? >> of course it is, it's used for internal police, by the drug enforcement administration, by the fbi. they use that to go after common crime inside the united states and then they have to do a parallel construction to substitute and discover data that would implicate them in a crimeul and use substitute for e nsa data in order to try them. that's simply a destruction of our entire judicial process. >> tucker: thanks a lot for coming back, your informed voice and be appreciated. up next, one column says instead over bathrooms, transgender americans ought to consider the accidental threat posed by radical islam, he joins us an expert the left is calling for mice to be barred from making immigrations, will talk to an attorney limiting the

reach of the u.s. law is a good idea. stay tuned. left foot. right foot. left foot. stop. twitch your eyes so they think you're crazy. if you walk the walk you talk the talk. it's what you do. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance you switch to geico. hide the eyes. it's what you do. show 'em real slow. various: (shouting) heigh! ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here.

>> tucker: conservative published a piece over the hill newspaper saying the real threat this country isn't present trump its radical islam, here'sr part of what hes wrote. "the real war lives of lgbt people is being waged by islamic extremists who have pledged the global elimination of lgbt people. "throwing a man to his death from the top of the building in the city, chris behrens joins us tonight. thanks for coming on.

what i find so strange people or for sin against us it makes sense to me. if why would groups that claim to advocate for the interest of americans also advocate for the admission of immigrants who may hate? >> absolutely make no sense whatsoever. we had a a conversation over the last couple decades about evolving opinions about evangelical christian opinions about lgbt people. there's been a lot of legitimate criticism and i think we seen a lot of changing of hearts andot minds. meanwhile, the left is completely and totally ignored the fact that islam has a serious problem with people. were not just talking about they won't let people use the bathrooms they identify with. throwing people off of buildings, killingba them. you look at the countries in the middle east and their positions on the lgbt people, it's illegal to be in iran. the penalty for being in iran's

death. this isn't just we don't like you were talking about state sanctioned murder of someone for being in the left turns a blind eye to it every single day. >> tucker: immigration plays a huge role in this, if you look atol who supports marie le pen,n anti-immigration person here, she might not be a perfect person, she has a lot of support in france for the obvious reaso reason. she is opposed to making france more islamic and people see that as a threat to them and why wouldn't they? >> absolutely dylan lgbt for trump event in cleveland, and while there spoke eloquently about the need to expect people for medical islam, marine le pen is on the exact same thing. donald trump did it during the campaign, he went out and said i will protect people from the spread of radical islam. meanwhile the clinton foundation was shoveling tens of millions of dollars m from repressive regimes like saudi arabia. >> i never understood that, how

do you get a pass from human rights campaigns if you're taking money from the saudi's. i never really understood why the nightclub shooting which killed a ton of people, and extremist dead, i never heard anything from that angle, from the organized groups i don't understand why. >>ic because they put politics over policy. the human rights campaign is a des facto lgbt wing of the democratic party, that's fine, and sets of what i wanted to that's fine. they should admit to that's what they're interested in, they should admit that they're interested in partisan politics. after what happened in orlando, donald trump came out and gave an impassioned plea for votes and said look, i'm not going to let this happen on my watch. did the human rights campaign say they attacked him for it, they attacked him for coming on segment.

>> tucker: you can't seek to appeal to to that are opposed to each other. >> the left is making a suicide pact right now, they think the future is having the radical islamist coming into this country, thatt ain't going to d well. >> tucker: i know it's not, it's just so obvious but nobody ever says it button thank you for saying it, good to see you. should we cripple immigration enforcement even further than we have. our next guest says ice should not be allowed to do immigration raids and schools, hospitals, churches, he'll tell us why after the break.

i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me that i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen. and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine

to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. trulicity is not insulin. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you or a family member has had medullary thyroid cancer, if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck; or severe pain in your stomach area. serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option,

click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. >> tucker: a gui >> tucker: a guideline implemented during 2011 during the obamaam administration, ice sensitiveng into locations, schools,nd hospitals, and a church is when they make going to immigration raids. they arrested an illegal immigrant who was camping outside his church, the move infuriated too many on the left which is vilified ice its job. he's a lawyer a democratic party strategist who supports created safe zones, thanks for coming on. there are a lot of questions about this policy, but the obvious one is apparent, is making a schoolng or hospital io a safe zone i for illegal aliens going to make schools or hospitals better? >> is not about making them better it's about providing the

really important social service institutions the fabric of our community. it's really about what we're doing to support people who are undocumented or citizens here in this country without hospitals, there are a lot more cost put on the taxpayer. the bigger issue which is coming from its actuary cities, >> i applaud you for admitting it's notbo about making schools and hospitals better, if you have kids in in the public school at have in your going to emergency room, it doesn't improve the institution or the experience for you, obviously, i'm just glad that you conceded that. >> i'm not quite conceding that, i'm saying it improves the social fabric of our communities, of course it improves >> do you think a

school gets better when it gets a massive influx of illegal aliens? were not talk about education couple talk about whether i should be following directly. >> it's not until people snuck into our country illegal commits to educate our children. >> it's the educated everybody whoer goes to that school, thats the idea. the larger point is whether he could have big roundups of people who are r undocumented fr committed no crime in this country because they wanted a better life, and some cases some people are seeking asylum in this country. the whole idea is to make sure that you don't have this destruction of the social fabri fabric. >> it's bad for them for sure, if i stuck into this country illegally and i was enjoying free schools and medical care and may be housing and subsidize food, ibe want want anyone to hassle me at all. i totally agree they must be against it. why would we favor and this

exactly? >> were talking about, when ice is going after folks according to the obama administration to the returned about 13% of undocumented immigrants. immigrants who were being targeted, people who were committing crimes, other issues on the record where they're bidding targeted for deportation. 87% of undocumented immigrants have done nothing in this country. in terms of committing a crime and putting themselves on the list when they should be getting deported. that's what the obama ad administration did now you'veti got it it administration review completely white in that go through this executive order. you're suggesting that these agents should be going to schools and hospitals and churches to round up people who are scareded to death. >> tucker: i bet a lot of them are good people too my only point is there's another interest in this interest i would have as an american citizen having decent schools. wreck the school system, my only

point is told to get a say on this too? or is it just about what's good for the illegal alien? >> i would disagree with that if you want to school in californi california. >> tucker: i think there is wide consensus that immigration is not been great for california. >> these placese should be safe zones for people and in the 2,000 elective is reasonable. you're talking about people who are undocumented. >> tucker: some to commit crimes but their presence here is a crime. i'm not saying they're bad people, i don't think people who don't register their guns are necessarily bad people. why would limiting this to immigration crimes, why couldn't a church be a safe haven, for people who violate federal gun lock with mark and if not, why not? >> i think that's completely

different. >> tucker: wise it is for immigration laws. it >>mi that gets us were talkig about here. >> i'd why should not be able to have safe haven and my kids at school, i'm serious. >> what your suggest to him as someone who has gone in the school and is not being arrested. >> i didn't register my gun i go into a school because i don't want to hurt the fabric of the community, shouldn't i be from enforcement ferments school? >> i would concede that a person should be of course be put in jail. >> tucker: you should get to decide which crime should be enforced. >> the firearm that is loaded is much different. >> tucker: it and pay my federal taxes i will not be a safe zone?a would that hurt the community, if i goo to jail it's good to hurt my kids. >> the bigger issue here that

the federalt government is tryg to impose some localie communits with a should and not be b doin. >> tucker: some people think that some federal laws should be ignored and some can't, how can we tell which should be obeyed and what should be? >> i think we need to start with what the substance of the issue is. i think we did talk about immigration and people who are undocumented, there is a decision by the prior administration and not necessarily disagreed with by the entire population that they would not invade these places. >> i paid too much in taxes and it bothers me that i get in trouble for it. ignore federal tax law, could you join me in that. >> may be a coalition for federalism, also knew that. we'll talk to a college student who said to sheila's points on a paper for setting a naughty word, what was that naughty word? will tell you, it will blow your

mind company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.

>> tucker: it's pretty hard to find actual offensive conduct on university campuses these days that doesn't stop professors from hallucinating it. english major at northern arizona university come on recent paper she had a point deducted from her score because she was the word mankind to describe humanity. her professor warned her that this was inappropriate gendered language contrary to how the word has been used by almost everybody for centuries. scottd said mankind referred ony to men and that was sexist. thanks a lot for coming on.av >> thanks for having made. >> tucker: it doesn't sound like this is a debate over accuracy, mankind is a real word and you used it correctly. it sounds like it's a debate or preference. she didn't like the way you used it, she didn't like your ideas and so she penalized he was that what happened?

>> exactly. i turned in a paper i had to use the word mankind and apparently that wasn't to her liking. that's sexist and not gender neutral language and i should be punished forla that. >> tucker: what i find so striking is that she's an english teacher, languages or a subject of study. accuracy has got to be a concern for anyone who is teaching kids. did she say it wasn't accurate. >> yeah she told me to tell mike that the word mankind only refers to men, doesn't include all of humanity. >> does the dictionary say that or is there some authoritative that position? >> she referred to the modern language association and

apparently they are enforcing this gender-neutral language. >> tucker: so you got a point off, did you say i'm contesting this, i don't think you should take a point off, how did you respond to her? >> i met with her after i saw that she had marked me off. i had a discussion with her very civil but she told me that using the word mankind was sexist and against women, apparently it has a history of holding women down in some fashion. >> tucker: i think we got a full screen here of her note to you. i would be negligent if i said i did not also raise the issue of gendered language and asked my student to respectf the lead fm neutral language, professor and scotch. harper physician as this is a pressing people, this is a tool of sexism, i'm wondering what

you think of it. who wasad a student in your told by her family that she could not reveal her hair in the presence of men, do you think professor scott would consider that sexist or say anything about it? >> she would say a thing about it. it >> tucker: that seem sexist tos you detailing, does it seem more sexist than the termnd mankind? >> actually, i have no idea why feminists are obsessing over a micro-aggression, issues over how the word mankind is used when there are women living under sharia law who are actually oppressed by an actual patriarchate. >> tucker:he quite a few macro aggressions in thispp world rigt now, thanks a lot for coming on. cap next a new report says young people are more likely to think that households ought to be led by men, why would they think that? our panel will discuss it, stay

tuned hey! you know, progressive is america's number-one motorcycle insurer. yeah, she does purr! best bike i ever owned! no, you're never alone, because our claims reps are available 24/7. we even cover accessories and custom parts. we diget an early start! took the kids to soccer practice. you want me to jump that cactus? all right. aah! that lady's awesome. i don't see a possum!

>> tucker: america's academics have produced some pretty weird reports this week, the first one by the american psychological association, warns that global warming may not just melt the ice caps and hurt the polar bears, it could give people ptsd by causing a surge in stressful weather events. managing editor at the independent women's forum, they join us both tonight onset. welcome to you both. ptsd, before you left, i want to rules al gore's view, it may change your mind, watch. >> the additional stress the

climate is causing really poses the threat of political disruption and chaos become the world would find it's really difficult to deal with. >> tucker: stress could be one of the big byproducts of global warming. >> you hear about kids at school, how their ruling the world, i think the only stress that comes from this is all the alarmism of guys like al gore or trying to scare everybody to desperate otherwise, this is a trumped up report. >> tucker: i think all my neighbors are deeply stressed may be in hysterics almost by the prospect of global warming, ice melting and polar birthing. >> i'm no scientist but i am a skeptic. i'm also from florida, so i can see why several days without son will put a little stress on someone. >> tucker: here's something astonishing, this is a real study i'm not exactly sure what it means.

it comes from the university of maryland that binds that attitudes towards traditional ones are making a comeback. 42% of high school seniors thought men should be the achievers outside the home while women handle domestic duties. today the number is 58% believe that. i'm a little bit surprised by that. >> interest income it certainly does fly in the face of everything you see in the media. i think this is a result of a lot of kids have grown up and their parents struggling with a lot of stress, single mom working hard, to parents juggling high-powered careers. this was tough, i wish i had a little more attention and i hope to have a different path when i'm a grown up. doesn't surprise me too much. >> tucker: it horrifies a lot of people, someone called belinda luscombe who works for time, here's how she i guess how she's a reporter of sorts.

grim news for those who thought achieving the equality between the sexes was a matter of time. judging high school students, why is it so offensive to peopl people? >> i don't think it's that grim i don't want to be taking out the trash. i don't think you want me cooking either. i think different roles and responsibilities are going to vary per household husband-and-wife and individual. it >> tucker: you would think that, whole premise of personal liberation is getting to chart your own course. you're not going to have to adhere to somebody else's idea of what your family ought to look like. here you have a majority of high school kids saying i'd rather my husband worked and i stayed home and she's valeri offended. >> i think so much of the women's studies program and feminist groups try to push this idea that equality is all about more women getting in the workplace. real women out there especially moms, they're much more likely to say they wish they could work less they want to come back up they want to spend more time with family.

there's been a lot of work is often just work, is not always self-actualizing at so much fun. >> tucker: should women be allowed to want that? or should we yell at them to be wanting that? >> women's places should be where she wants to be, her husband should be right there supporting her. >> tucker: want to give you a follow-up, with told you about orange coast college, that's a place. a professor there called olga perez feeble cox caught on camera saying this. >> it's an act of terrorism, one of the most striking things for me is that the people committing the assault are among them. >> tucker: no bad deed goes unrewarded in a recent vote the faculty voted to name her faculty member of the year. what about the kid, his name is caleb o'neill, he's the one who recorded cox in class, he didn't make out so well. the school suspended him and

said it if you wanted to return there he would have to write an apology. his suspension was reversed but only after he threatened a lawsuit. up next, colleges are already richer than many small countries into much more smug? why are they getting billions from the federal government every year. stay tuned for the numbers. i realize that ah, that $100k is not exactly a fortune.

well, a 103 yeah, 103. well, let me ask you guys. how long did it take you two to save that? a long time. then it's a fortune. well, i'm sure you talk to people all the time who think $100k is just pocket change. right now we're just talking to you. i told you we had a fortune. yes, you did. getting closer to your investment goals starts with a conversation. schedule a complimentary goal planning session today.

>> tucker: well, america and throughout the world, the ivy league represents the pinnacle of prestige and wealth in the hope of opportunity. but a new report suggests that wealth is built on a huge amount of taxpayer money. then you report opening the books to finds the past six years, the eight ivy league schools have $41 billion from the federal

government. that is $854 million per school per year. urmally taken through undergraduate tuition. it's not that they are poor, the combined endowment for those eco-schools separated apart where 119 billion in 2015. that is greater than the gdp of 16 states and more than 130 countries internationally. keep in mind, thanks to federal law, those endowments are allowed to grow tax-free. that have stem posting $6 billion. are you getting that deal with your investments? probably not. most ivy league professors say they pay higher taxes. it should be time to take them up on their higher might offer. keep in mind, they despise you and everything you stand for. that's it for us. turning every night at 9:00 for the show that is the sworn enemy of lying pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. dvr it if you don't already. starting monday, we moved back next door to a brand-new studio.

it should be unbelievable. watch "hannity." he's next. have a great weekend. ♪ >> sean: welcome to this busy friday news night here on "hannity." we will have newt gingrich, kellyanne conway, jay sekulow, monica crowley. they will all join us. but first. for the good of the country. it is time to end this gop's circular firing squad and that is tonight's opening monologue. sometimes in life when things don't go exactly the way we want, people get frustrated, annoyed. and there is no more frustrating place on earth than washington, d.c. i get why the president is upset that republicans cannot hammer out this deal on health care last week. the president to his credit has a big bold aggressive agenda.