>> neil: thank you very much. mike tobin in chicago. we are finding out more about the who's who in the republican party trying to save the republican party. reworking the tax cuts. >> greg: i am greg gutfeld with kimberly guilfoyle, bob beckel, eric bolling, and dana perino, "the five" ." what does susan rice know about the accusation that she is behind the attempt to unmask trump officials? i bet it's nothing. >> i know nothing about this. i was surprised to see reports from chairman nunes on that count today. i really don't know to what chairman nunes was referring. i was not aware of any orders given to disseminate that kind of information. the fact is that the president

did request, back in december, the intelligence community compile all the information that it had on what had transpired during the campaign. >> greg: she is unaware of orders but she knew of the request. sneaky ploy. i'm going to try that this weekend. sir, i didn't order the drug. i just requested them. this is pure rice. she blamed benghazi on a video. now she is pulling a sergeant schultz. she sees nothing. she knows nothing. maybe she can blame her amnesia on an episode of "hogan's heroes." >> i leaked nothing to nobody and never have i never would. >> greg: she leaked nothing to nobody, a double negative. she either linked everything to everyone or maybe she just misspoke. this woman is crafty. did she break the law? incidental collection is legal. we know this.

when you surveilled a foreigner but you get picked up too. could be reverse monitoring. igor is just the wing man. if you can find reverse monitoring and unmasking, it may be legal but it's uncool. others refer to raise hell over russian collusion. the leak story is on firmer ground while the collusion stuff remains foggy. it's like the yankees and the red sox. everyone is wildly devoted to their team and hates the other. meanwhile we use -- lucite of the real threat. dana just said it was a good monologue. i will start with kimberly instead. did she do nothing wrong?

should she go to jail for many years? >> kimberly: i think you figured it out. you solved the puzzle. it was either she leaked everything to everyone, or i don't know. she was crafty because of course she did not admit in this interview that she leaked classified information, which would be a criminal act. she didn't deny the unmasking but she didn't take it a step further. if she goes in front of the house and senate committees, what is she going to do? take the fifth? that's what i think is going to happen. >> greg: dana, was she just being crafty or was she abusing her power? >> dana: in the interview, andrea mitchell doesn't use that cliff you showed which was a month ago susan rice saying she knew nothing about it. i think if you go back to nunes

adam schiff. the part i liked about the monologue was when you said if you're in a race to see was going to win this, then you are like, obviously today if you support from, well, there's that. obviously she did something. there is probably going to be more to this story. she's not only going to have to testify in front of them but it's plausible that in the fbi investigation, they know of this as well. >> kimberly: i think so. >> dana: probably. >> greg: eric, do you believe this was politically motivated? >> eric: i think it is bigger than what we are making it out to be right now. where there is no, there is fire. fire leading right to susan rice. i think this is going to continue to expand. there's no way this is limited solely to mike flynn and maybe other operatives. i would bet you this continues. you will see more and more. the problem is, when it goes

beyond that, is it incidental or targeted? i don't know. right now we have incidental. then she says i didn't leak it. somewhere between her demand for the unmasking of the name in the name being in the media, somewhere a felony was committed. was it her? i don't know. someone around her? could be. she has a lot of explaining to do. why is a white house staffer, susan rice, demanding the unmasking of the name when the nsa, fbi, and cia all had access to the information and none of them chose to unmask flynn's name because he didn't seem important enough. what was it about susan rice other than her proximity to the president to make it so important to unmask the names? >> kimberly: she is a key player, inner circle. >> bob: national security advisor. >> eric: nsa, fbi, cia kept the names masked. >> bob: when you mentioned the

two sides, who leaked want and who licked another. in the russian issue, the russian scandal, it's the largest single crime against the united states ever committed by a foreign country. >> eric: you are ignoring the question. >> bob: this interruption every time i talk. >> eric: bob, this is what you do. you change the topic. the topic was susan rice. >> bob: i can change whatever i want. the point is, she said she didn't leak it. she said she unmask it. at this point, everybody knew the russians, facts and rumors about russian involvement in the presidential election. of course, unmask everybody or anybody. >> dana: she said she knew nothing about it. >> bob: i think she was referring to the leaking.

>> eric: i was surprised to see the reports from chairman nunes on that account. i know nothing about this. >> kimberly: lying. >> bob: what was she talking about? what was nunes talking about? >> eric: the unmasking. >> bob: how do we know that? >> dana: i think that is fact, bob. >> bob: a couple people were unmasked. >> eric: she said she had no knowledge of any of it happenin happening. now we know she demanded these names be unmasked. >> bob: i noticed in the trump campaign, former military guy through a back channel to putin for trump. did you notice that story? >> greg: what about back channels to iran? why is it okay for obama to metal? >> bob: this is talking about

the election. >> greg: and we've never done that with israel? we never sent any money to help beat netanyahu? >> bob: it's a question of leaking false information about hillary clinton. >> greg: the russians were probably involved but is there collusion? right now, it is a speculative fog. we don't know. we need an investigation. i am with you, bob. >> eric: she lied about this. >> bob: who cares? >> eric: who cares? hold it. she was the right hand of president obama demanding the name of a trump operative to be unmasked. likely, who knows? but definitely -- >> bob: the president of the united states lied about -- trump lies all the time. >> eric: what about the next name? what about the next name that goes out in the media, then what are you going to say? >> bob: so what. >> eric: she is breaking the law. someone is breaking the law. >> bob: he lied about being

tapped and you let that go and you're worried about susan rice, whose reputation is being besmirched by you guys because you're trying to take the focus off of russia. because you know and i know that the trump campaign, somebody. >> eric: we have a lot more evidence that susan rice lied in who unmasked and who leaked that we do have any collusion of the trump campaign with the russians. this holds a hell of a lot more weight right now. >> bob: they are still working on it. >> kimberly: bob, they have produced no evidence whatsoever. by the way, no indication this influenced and affected the outcome of the election. was there any vote tampering? >> bob: the story about sending out the press releases in wisconsin. >> eric: leaking. >> bob: if you know something about politics -- >> eric: leaking flynn's name

is a felony. bob, someone committed a felony paired we know that for a fact. why don't we find out who did i it? >> bob: did he not ask for immunity from prosecution and they turned him down. >> eric: he didn't commit the felony. someone committed the felony by leaking general flynn's name. >> bob: names get leaked all the time. >> greg: political motivation. let's roll that. >> this is not anything political has been alleged. the allegation is that somehow the obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes. that's absolutely false. >> did you seek the names of people involved, to unmask the names of people involved in the trump transition, trump campaign, people surrounding the president-elect? >> absolutely not for any

political purposes. >> dana: i think that might be eventually where she ends up figuring out a way to explain herself. she might say well, it wasn't for political purposes. it was maybe because in the collection, you had to russians, russians are monitored. you had two russians talking about somebody like mike flynn. does that raise alarm bells? do they have thoughts about how they're going to try to do something? there's lots of ways i suppose in any scenario she might be able to try to explain that. but then, if you go back to "the new york times" piece a couple months ago that said the obama administration was planting breadcrumbs all around in order to make sure that investigators or the press eventually could find it. find their way back to this. i think that's the big question for me. >> bob: she said herself that the obama administration ordered

any information having to do with russia and the elections, all the collection you can make, if it were up to me, i would have tapped all of them, myself. i firmly believe the russians helped donald trump get elected president. she already said the administration, and trump knew it because obama and trump talked about it. >> dana: that's true. >> bob: they knew there was an active investigation by the fbi. >> eric: explain one question. >> bob: i don't need to explain anything. >> eric: i am asking for your theory, fbi, cia, nsa are directed to do exactly this. if there's any collusion between any u.s. person in the russians, anything going on, it's our job to unearth it and investigate i it. why would an obama appointee, a staffer, susan rice, demand these people's names be open if the fbi, cia, nsa --

>> bob: she was not doing her job. >> eric: there is no other reason. the white house does not perform investigations. >> bob: what she did was she disseminated the information. >> eric: that's illegal. >> kimberly: guaranteeing the information was going to be leaked because she went ahead despite the fact that the agencies found no evidence of wrongdoing. and ordered them to produce detailed records of phone calls. >> bob: that's not right. the fbi is deep in this investigation. believe me, before this is over -- do you think they have been doing this for seven months for fun? you don't think they have anything? >> eric: what does that mean? general flynn's name. unmasked by susan rice for political reasons.

>> bob: the blackwater consultant paid by their campaign to set up a channel. you don't want to talk about that? you want to talk about susan rice? >> greg: the longer this silliness indoors, the more putin wins. america is a couple quarreling in public. >> dana: i do not do that. >> greg: it is the worst thing. who wins? putin. he thinks it's hilarious. >> kimberly: let's go. >> greg: that was fun. mainstream media has been all over every trump-related russian involvement. many networks not covering susan rice at all. no matter how dusty the room or how high the pollen count, flonase allergy relief keeps your eyes and nose clear. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances that cause nasal congestion and itchy, watery eyes. for relief beyond the nose. flonase.

dear freshpet, zooka had digestive problems and wouldn't eat. then i fed him freshpet. that's why a cutting edgeworld. university counts on centurylink to keep their global campus connected. and why a pro football team chose us to deliver fiber-enabled broadband to more than 65,000 fans. and why a leading car brand counts on us to keep their dealer network streamlined and nimble. businesses count on communication, and communication counts on centurylink.

various: (shouting) heigh! ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here. all while reducing america's emissions. you totanobody's hurt, new car. but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™,

you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.

♪ >> eric: unmasking outrage. president obama's national security advisor denied there was any political motive behind the unmasking of trump team members from intelligence reports. msnbc's andrea mitchell didn't press her too hard. the mainstream media doesn't see this is a big story. "washington post" calls it a fake scandal. if you're watching the broadcast networks last night, you didn't see it reported all.

cbs given 45 seconds, most of which were spent defending susan rice. if you are watching cnn, this is what you heard. >> no evidence that backs up the president's original claim. on this program tonight, we will not insult your intelligence by pretending otherwise. nor will we aid and abet the people trying to misinform you, the american people, by creating a diversion. >> eric: with all due respect to my friend don, he is wrong. i am not abetting the president, nor am i creating a distraction. susan rice knows the american people -- owes the american people more answers. i have a hunch it's going to get bigger and bigger. >> bob: a crash in texas were a lot of people died yesterday on a bus. must more important than susan rice. they cover that, and some others did not.

why you think unmasking names, perfectly legal, is somehow a big story. >> eric: leaking the name is the illegal part. >> bob: why don't you say she leaked it. >> eric: i will look in the camera and say someone leaked general flynn's name. >> kimberly: that's why there's going to be an investigation, and it is an important story and it should be covered by all responsible media. i think that's a valid argument, valid point to be made. it deserves attention on the broadcast networks and cable news network's and that's why we are doing a story. and you should come as an american, be concerned, whether it's a republican or democrat, if this kind of information was unmasked and properly and or leaked. why wouldn't you want to get to the bottom of it? >> bob: i think there are so many more important things to do on the russian investigation of choosing our president. >> kimberly: and you want to

disparage the president. >> bob: i like don lemon pair he's a good man for her he's right, this is a diversion. spicer, he's a liar himself. >> dana: bob, bob. >> bob: what? >> eric: let's talk about the treatment of this story. is it overblown? >> dana: it reminds me a lot of benghazi. why did she go on five sunday shows? why did she say this. then not too long after that, there was the bowe bergdahl situation where she basically became a lightning rod. for a national security advisor, that's pretty unusual, and then you didn't hear from her again after that for quite a while. she was probably one of the most invisible national security advisors after those incidents. she she already had a credibiliy problem with let's say half the country. the fact that she is trying to explain it and it doesn't quite make sense, why she said she didn't know anything about the reports. apparently she recently tweeted

a moment ago saying "i did not know what reports nunes was referring to when he spoke to the press. i still do not for the full intelligence community needs to know." i knew she had to come out today to defend herself but i don't think she answered. >> greg: it is human nature, the longer you stink out of certain turf, though more investment you have minutes. cnn is investing a lot of their turf inclusion, so they can't let go of that. you could say the same thing for certain other conservative media. invested in a certain story. we at least, i believe, do not dismiss the russian story. we want investigations into the russian story. we do not dismiss the surveillance story. we think they equally deserve it. look at it this way. you don't call my kid ugly. i don't call your kid fat. you indulge my scandal. i indulge your scandal. we must investigate both.

why not -- and have the freedom to contemplate all sides. do not choose sides. it doesn't have to be a grudge match between surveillance and collusion because it's going to end, just like tic-tac-toe does. when it ends in a cat, that's what this is. >> bob: they used to call me both fat and ugly. it >> dana: but they never called you a cat. >> eric: the intel community was fine keeping these names masked. >> bob: keeping them masked? >> eric: the names were masked and susan rice said we need these names -- other than political. >> bob: i hope it were political, number one. >> dana: i don't think you are helping her. >> greg: you would be the worst southern lawyer. >> bob: wait a second. we are sitting on top of this

scandal and yes we've covered it, i agree, and i'm glad we do but i think the idea of biting into one of the breitbart, and i do believe this president doesn't tell the truth. they throw this out there and everybody goes running out there. in the meantime, the big story is sitting there not getting the kind of attention. >> eric: >> greg: this is a teas set up for both sides prayed we all do this period we talked about benghazi during the obaman found something else to talk about. >> dana: they said we were ridiculous. >> greg: i think we have to admit that's what's going on here and it allows us to look at other stories. >> kimberly: these should be followed and pursued on parallel paths. they are of equal importance. investigate the russian story while investigating surveillance of u.s. citizens. >> bob: you think it's equal? >> kimberly: absolutely.

>> eric: there was asive fourth amendment rights violated by somebody. who perpetrated it and for what reason? >> kimberly: and the surveillance in terms of the unmasking and subsequent leakin leaking. >> bob: it is not illegal to unmasked. if you've been ordered by the person of the united states to check in every possible angle with the russians trying to affect the election, which they did, if you are susan rice or i was in that seat, i would unmask it too. >> eric: for what reason? if the intel community says we are fine keeping it masked, why does susan rice? >> bob: you are the one who said this was surveilling trump. turned out to be two entirely different -- >> eric: i'm not sure what you're talking about. the white house, under susan rice, demanded these names be unmasked when the intelligence community was fine.

>> kimberly: these are the facts in the report saying they made a determination. >> eric: one comey and rogers testified at the center panel. >> dana: on the media part of it, last week when it was revealed through michael flynn's lawyer that he was going to offer to testify in exchange for immunity, every one of those networks we put out, all the media covered that story from tooth to tail. this one is also a significant development and i think the argument here is doesn't that development deserve the same kind of attention? >> bob: i don't disagree with covering the story. what i disagree with is the equivalency between this and the outrageous russian, investigation. >> kimberly: when you look at the juxtaposition of the coverage and the lack of coverage here by the mainstream media and the other cable networks. >> bob: the trump campaign and may be trump or in bed with

putin. >> eric: that is such a leap. >> bob: you say she leaked that story. >> eric: i did not. i said someone leaked it. please listen to me. someone leaked the name. we know that for a fact and we know that's a felony. i didn't say her, but someone linked it. >> eric: we've got to go. we are being wrapped. next, this might cause some controversy. trump administration weighing an extreme vetting plan for all foreign travelers. we will tell you what it might lead to next. [ male announcer ] imagine what you wear every day

actually making your body feel better... that's exactly what tommie copper does for people everywhere. they call it "wearable wellness," and tommie copper has infused it into everything they do. why not experience the difference tommie copper can make in your life? go to tommiecopper.com, enter your e-mail to become part of the tommie copper community, and get 15%

off your entire order, plus free shipping. life hurts, feel better.

ltry align probiotic.n your digestive system? for a non-stop, sweet treat goodness, hold on to your tiara kind of day.

get 24/7 digestive support, with align. the #1 doctor recommended probiotic brand. now in kids chewables. remember here at ally, nothing stops us from doing right by our customers. who's with me? we're like a basketball team here at ally. if a basketball team had over 7... i'm in. 7,000 players. our plays are a little unorthodox. but to beat the big boys, you need smarter ways to save people money. we know what you want from a financial company and we'll stop at... nothing to make sure you get it. one, two... and we mean nothing. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> dana: throughout the campaign, candidate trump promise there would be extreme vetting of immigrants and refugees entering the usa. his administration is reviewing whether to vet all foreign

travelers. according to "the wall street journal," some of the options under consideration include asking foreigners for their cell phones, their social media passwords or even financial records which could apply to visa applicants as well. eric, i wanted to ask you, obviously this is just a proposal. they are trying to think it through but it seems, do you think it's a necessary step or two tough? >> eric: i think you are going to get a lot of pushback from businesses because they need those visa holders to come work. you want to talk about extreme? give us your mobile phones. we want to look into your social media passwords and financial records? look, i think it may be a little too far. i am in favor of a tough, tough application process but i am more in favor of getting people here on a legal basis. >> dana: there could be a quid pro quo. france, germany people coming to visit the u.s. from those

countries that we are going to take, get their passwords paid the same could be asked of us. would you go there if you had to turn over your password? >> greg: it would be a great excuse not to go. i've got to go to a wedding in greece. i don't want to go there. i hate destination weddings. they are so selfish. if you travel rarely, then this will be a rare imposition on you. if you are a frequent international traveler, i imagine there will be a process like tsa pre-check that will streamline this. it is the people who travel rarely that are going to be put through this. vetting sounds bad. but we are talking about, all we are trying to do is target a doctrine incompatible with freedom. in order to maintain your freedom which is fragile, you have to protect it. freedom is like a van gogh or picasso. you don't just leave it out there. it's got to be protected so people can enjoy it. >> dana: in order to make it

legal, they have to make it sound broader than it is. >> greg: that is the pc move. everyone's got to suffer. >> kimberly: some suffer more than others, it seems. here's the thing, you can understand a lot of countries, it when you go over to another country, they have subjected to these extreme restrictions or requirements, i am all for protecting national security but with upholding the law. these are people that are doing this to u.s. citizens and people coming in but they want to make sure and verify their information. we've all learned recently with events that have gone on in the world, people are able to obtain fake documents and the problem is, and why this law came into effect to begin with, was there was an inability to properly vet in certain countries. they weren't able to verify that information. that makes sense, it is specific and tailored to those places of unrest where they can't tell you who that person is or how old

they are. there's no no way to verify it. if you apply this to that and say those circumstances, of course there's probably going to be challenges, just like we saw with the travel. >> dana: bob, how you feel about giving out your password? >> bob: are you kidding? >> dana: how do you safeguard the information? >> bob: probably everybody will agree that israel has the most toughest vetting coming into their country. it doesn't compare to this. this has abandon written all over it. this sounds like something the germans had a 1938. the idea that you are asked for cell phone or password, you're going to be watching those films for a long time. the fact of the matter is, they put people through vetting that was unbelievable. this is un-american. >> dana: if president obama had proposed, would you have --

>> bob: i would've said the same thing. i take people's privacy as sacrosanct in this country and i don't think, ever since they started this vetting, has anyone been picked up? >> dana: maybe we don't know it and maybe we shouldn't. >> kimberly: yeah, bob. >> bob: hand you my password. >> eric: this is mostly going to affect people who are trying to come over here on visas. we know some 35% to 40% jump their visa. >> kimberly: wait until raqqa falls on those fighters return to their home country. >> greg: do not worry about the regular international trave travel. >> dana: had come a new attempt by president trump to keep foreign workers from taking american jobs. will it work? we will talk about it next.

i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me that i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen. and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. trulicity is not insulin. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you or a family member has had medullary thyroid cancer,

if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck; or severe pain in your stomach area. serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option, click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. click to activate your within. i was thinking around 70. to and before that?re? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now

and as your needs change with investment management services.

a cockroach can survive submergede guy. underwater for 30 minutes. wow. yeah, wow. not getting in today. not on my watch. pests never stop trying to get in. we never stop working to keep them out. terminix. defenders of home. what's the best way to get v8 or a fancy juice store?s? ready, go! hi, juice universe? one large rutabaga, with eggplant... done! that's not fair. glad i had a v8. the original way to fuel your day.

>> we are going to protect your jobs by protecting our borders, and we will crackdown on visa abusers that undermine the american worker, and we are doing that right now. >> kimberly: that was president trump addressing the administration's crackdown on employers that hire foreigners over americans. the justice department says it won't tolerate any misuse of h1b visa processes to discriminate against u.s. workers and is threatening prosecution if discrimination is in fact discovered. dana, this is an issue of tremendous concern. i think to a lot of people that supported president trump and his movement of the forgotten men and women across the country that felt that this country, the administration wasn't being responsive to their needs, their

desire for gainful employment and work to be able to support their families. >> dana: there was a report on "60 minutes" that was mind-blowing and heart wrenching. he was about workers, the h1 b process, if you are an employer and you can't find an american to take the job, then you can take the step. that happens in high tech's misses. in the 60 minutes report, people doing regular jobs that don't need highly skilled professionals. they were being made by their employers to train their replacements of people coming in on h1b visas from wherever. in this case, it was india. that american, who was getting kicked out of his job, was having to train the next guy and it was humiliating and horrible. that's the kind of practice this is supposed to crackdown on i think it's a good thing if you support trump or don't, abuse of the process is terrible. >> kimberly: it's important because this has been going on.

it's been exposed and something can be done about it which hopefully will have a cumulative impact on our job numbers and gainful employment. >> eric: i am having a hard time with this and i agree it was a heart wrenching story. there was a loophole in the h1b visa program that put in. he wasn't anticipating it getting into this level. how do you anticipate 20, 30 years down the road but it's gotten to the point where dana is right. a bunch of companies and to have having employees train their replacements and it looks terrible. the bottom line is, workers from india coming over doing the same job at a lower price of the company without some benefits they needed to provide an american. look, i understand this but i want to be true to my bones, free markets, you've got to be able to hire we want when you want to hire them. >> kimberly: follows the law and the rules. >> eric: they are not breaking the law, that's the problem.

there's a loophole put in there, a backdoor loophole they are exploiting. >> kimberly: this flies in the face of the intention of the program and how it was supposed to be implemented. that's my point. it shouldn't be at the expense of american workers who deserve to have the jobs i have a not to be thrown out by google and facebook and the high tech companies using the process for their own profit to the detriment of american workers. >> bob: part of it does work. i think if you look at silicon valley, a lot of the test come from people who have these visas for highly trained in a particular area of i.t. paired we've got to be a little careful but i think they are misusing it. at the same time, he said visas. if he goes to logan airport in boston, you will see aer lingus drop off 300 people for a

tourist visa of seven days. when they get back on the plane, there's about 100 of them left. the rest of them are bartenders in boston. let's follow through on all of it. those are jobs americans could use. >> kimberly: they also have a new hotline to report h1b visa violations as well. >> greg: i think this has marginal value. the bigger focuses focusing on the training and education of the native born. the transfer of work to machine machines, if automation does this to human beings, what would become? you have silicon valley billionaires buying up remote cabins, building panic rooms and safe houses. tens of millions of unemployed healthy americans were going to screen for the heads of the people who invented the very products that eliminated their livelihoods. what are you going to do when

you have 40, 50, 60 million people who have no function in society. 13,000 jobs. these are routine tasks, temporary jobs. this is going to be nothing in 30 years. we've got a huge issue. >> kimberly: call your contractor. build your panic room. >> greg: i have a panic room inside my panic room. >> kimberly: a push by bernie sanders to make college tuition free for all. would republicans ever get behind the bill? next.

♪ >> bob: one of bernie sanders' signature proposals, free college for all. the senator hasn't given up his effort to make it a reality. he introduced a bill yesterday alongside elizabeth warren and others to make public universities and colleges tuition free. >> our job, if we are smart, is to do everything possible to make it easier for people to get the education they need, not harder. >> how are we going to pay for? >> i will tell you. we are going to ask wall street

to end their speculation. were going to put a speculation tax on wall street. we are not going to leave school 50,000 or $100,000 in debt. when you give tax breaks to billionaires. >> bob: we have a short period of time here. >> eric: bernie sanders wants socialized education. i go with the free market education. endowments, $32.7 billion at harvard, 24 billion, yale. the reason why this is happening is colleges are charging more and more and more because they know student loan debt is going to be forgiven or excused. they have no accountability to the free markets. >> dana: they bring in foreign students because they pay full tuition. i would also add this is an industry ripe for innovation and disruption. either expand high school by two years. that's your goal, right? that's what the woman who runs ibm thinks it would be a good

idea to keep jobs here or innovate the university. >> greg: eternal law is if it's free it's devalued. where do you feel safer, your bathroom or the bathroom in the new york public library. i know which one is not safe. it's great being a pinko because you never have to pick up the check. you're only generous with other people's money. sanders should go back to teaching drivers ed and elizabeth warren should give tours of the local artifacts museum. >> kimberly: warren and bernie sanders want to transfer the cost of this to the american taxpayer. i'm all for education, having been an educator. >> bob: i will go last here as usual. let me say this, the reason i am in favor of this for public universities and colleges is the

amount of tax that people pay who get a college education versus those that don't will more than pay for what bernie sanders is talking about. leave your cherished wall street people behind. anyway. i'm going to tease after i stop getting beat up. "one more thing" is next.

♪ >> greg: "one more thing." i hate these people. let me elaborate on why i don't like destination weddings. you have to buy a ticket, get a hotel room, take time off. if you don't do it, the messages you don't care enough about these people getting married so you feel guilty and that forces you to go. i hate destination weddings. >> bob: okay, in the pew research center came out with women making 83% of what men make. ivanka trump, who lent her name, this is what she tweeted. i think we've got it. can somebody read it? a >> greg: equal pay is a reminder women deserve equal pay for equal work. we must work to close the gender

pay gap. >> bob: i think so, thank you. >> greg: fake news. there is no pay gap. fake news. fake news. >> kimberly: let's just get through this. >> dana: i have real news about a dog named dodge. a police dog in north yorkshire and he shows you how to enter a vehicle. take a look. that is dutch. he has the gumption and ability to do his job and that's how he would enter a vehicle. >> kimberly: extreme vetting. >> greg: great breath. >> eric: hosting tonight. >> dana: i will see you in an hour. big interview with senator mcconnell.

>> eric: ncaa championship, gonzaga and unc. what a fantastic game, down to under a minute. it was a one-point game going back and forth. university of north carolina, congratulations. national champions. president obama, i've got to hand it to you. you called it. kimberly. >> kimberly: thank you so much. i have some reading to recommend. dana, you know i love -- i love the military in the sense of book called "undaunted. life's toughest battles are not always fought in a war zone." fantastic book. once you read this, he's got another one for you that's coming out i believe in june called "enemy in the wire." throws the readers into all the intersections and workings of u.s. special operations. they spoke in particular is all about his time serving in the

military with the seals. it's a great read. >> greg: excellent. set your dvr so you never miss an episode of "the five." that doesn't fret. "special report" is up next. >> former obama administration official accused of unmasking names of trump campaign and transition members caught up in surveillance says that has nothing to do with politics. republicans want her to say it under oath. this is "special report" ." good evening, welcome to washington. i am bret baier. top national security advisor under former president obama insists politics did not play a part in her decision to request the identities of americans whose communications were intercepted by intelligence agents. susan rice denies leaking anything. republican