was a mob scene out there but never fear, secretary sean spicer said it was a be an excellent time. he said that, not me. have ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight" despite donald trump being an alleged russian puppets, the american tensions with russia keep rising. a russian official said relations are at the lowest point since the cold war. at secretary of state rex tiller's and had an unproductive meeting with vladimir putin in moscow. >> president trump: right now were not getting along with russia at all. if we may be at an all-time low in terms of relationship with russia. >> we need to put an end to this steady degradation which is not doing nothing to restore the

trust between our two countries or to make progress on the issues of greatest importance to both of us. >> tucker: democratic structuralists strategist and it says there's plenty of warning signs that the administration is too cozy with russia. thanks for coming on. the relationship is bad right now, you heard the russians say the very same, use of the prime minister say were as close to war as we've been in a long time, do you believe any of this? is it is just part of the conspiracy? >> i actually do, i found today's developments on the one hand discouraging but on the other hand heartening. if you saw the ad administration speaking with one voice about russia and await many democrats fear they never would. russian is an adversary of the united states and you have ambassador haley, secretary tillerson and even president trump saying the right thing. >> tucker: you're happy that were moving toward a war. that's what you just said to clearly democrats are happy

about it they want a confrontation with russia and i guess the question is why? one of the democratic party become the war party? >> i'm happy that this administration is taking russia seriously and the secretary tillerson sent the right signals today in his meeting with the foreign minister. >> tucker: but again, the prime minister of russia said that u.s.-american relations "are ruined and we are on the brink of armed conflict." that's bad, why would that be heartening to you? >> it's heartening in the sense that i believe during the campaign and thereafter, this president hasn't taken russia seriously. he said through multiple occasions, things that cause us to question whether he put the united states interest first. today we saw this administration seems to be doing that that's what's heartening to me. >> tucker: it's strange to be having watched politics so long to see the democrats so avidly pushing for a conflict with russia. i'm just confused, this is the

new liberal position that because the people who run the country don't respect human rights efficiently or they put propaganda into the american system, that we need to be in conflict with them. i'm honestly confused but >> i think it's more complicated than that. i think you have people on the left who are angry about the election so they are pushing this. you have national security agencies, you have richard for the chairman of the senate intelligence committee, we have to get to the bottom of it and as a secretary tiller's and said today russia undoubtedly interfered with our elections and there ought to be more, stir penalties. still there's literally no evidence of that at all none that has come into the public view that russia affected the outcome of the election. i guess what you are saying is here's the new threshold: if the country attempts to affect the outcome or injects its propaganda, they are our enemy and we have to have a bellicose posture with them is that the new standard? lot of countries to meet that

standard, not just a few. >> russia interfered aggressively in our elections, they had thousands of people and internet bots trying to proliferate news that's fake on the internet to get people's opinions to change, that's inappropriate. >> tucker: what was the readership to that do no? it was basically around zero. there is no evidence that any of that information swayed a single vote. you have the russian television station which i think has an view of 30,000. as a keen observer i am missing, the animus toward russia stems from what, a lot of countries have done what russia did. why are we really met with russia on the left, what is this really about? >> i don't think it's left or right, i think it's country before party. you have many republicans who believe these things, lindsey graham, john mccain, richard ibarra. have direct or comey who aggressively went after hillary clinton in the

investigation, i don't think this is a partisan issue so much as we need to get the bottom of it. >> tucker: the permanent establishment in washington, my question is why would that be good for the united states? you saw democrats say that it was deeply troubling that the trump administration alerted the russian military before striking syria, would have been better to kill some of them with air strikes? >> i think what you have there is people weren't assured that the administration was put in the united states interests first. that's why they might have made a statement like that. what you saw today, however, was a very resolute administration, one which is not going to take a slaughter of innocent children lightly. >> tucker: innocent children are slaughtered around the world every single day and nobody says boo about it. if i'm agnostic on the questionf russia. excellent base succinctly, why a helps event states.

>> interests at heart -- coat >> tucker: there are no country at earth with our interest at heart. >> we have allies, we have enemies, we have adversaries different degrees. >> tucker: what these event states benefit by taking some and aggressive with russia, an avowed appointment of islamic terrorism which i think you would concede. why should that person be excited about moving toward war with russia? >> don't misunderstand me i think for a while a lot of people weren't doing that. >> tucker: again, you're not answering the question, what do we get out of this? typically when the united states formulates a policy position abroad the aim is to make america safer or more prosperou prosperous. in what sense does this confrontation with russia now on going to make our country safer or more prosperous? >> with respect to our

elections, it makes us safer in our democratic processes to make sure that their integrity is preserved. we know from testimony -- coat >> tucker: there is no evidence, there's not a single person come forward i change my vote because i was watching rt. >> there's no evidence that al qaeda or isis have successfully breached our chemical plants, does that mean we shouldn't try to stop them? >> tucker: al qaeda and isis have killed one thousands of americans, russia hasn't done so. i feel less safe than i did a month ago thanks to cheerleading by the left pushing this administration toward conflict. it >> i doubt this administration is listening to the left. i don't believe were on the brink of war despite bellicose statements to the contrary by russia. i don't look to russia as to where we stand. >> tucker: apparently earlier this morning, not apparently, i think, a u.s. commercial flight flying from san francisco to

shanghai was turned away at the edge of russian airspace and the passengers were told that american carrier is not permitted to enter russian airspace for diplomatic reasons. if that turns out to be true, that's the suggestion that tensions are getting to a level that is dangerous and i would think as a liberal and a democrat you would say whoa, wait a second. this is scary. instead you and many others are cheerleading this. >> i wouldn't say that. i think that's certainly troubling. what's heartening about today is tillerson and his counterpart announced that they are going to move back to noninterference with respect to airspace over syria and that's certainly much more significant because we could've had a military confrontation and where they are backing away from that. i also think it's heartening that they seem to have agreed to continue talking. there may be bellicose statements from the russians but we seem to be trying to resolve the situation as best we can. >> tucker: china mistreats its own citizens, dissent is crushed, dissidents are killed, it is invaded another country and occupies it, it seeks our

destruction. chinese government has hacked into american government apparent though my computers many times it's factual for 20 pushing for sections against china, where she pushing for competition against china, it meets all the criteria you lay down. >> what you pointed out is united states seeks to act in the spend is chris. if it's been one of you think it is been interest. they're doing everything russia has done much more. >> i do but sit at the united since government. human rights are awful. >> tucker: so we should wage war. >> absolutely not. >> tucker: songs about it, that was then, democrats are the reflective party of war, all wars except those with an obvious benefit to us in the united states. if there is a humanitarian quagmire on the other side of the gold, they are all for committing troops and you better before it too or they will denounce you, don't believe it?

ask kelsey gabbert. she remember the lessons of a rock perhaps because she served there herself and she has consistently warned against intervening in syria, she said it serves no u.s. interest likely empower terror groups and it could have dramatically increased the suffering of civilians there. you might not agree with her point of view but you cannot call her positions crazy because they are not crazy. they are still too much for the modern democratic party. just last weekend, she was denounced by none other than howard dean who called her a disgrace. remember how her? is a former peacenik who ran for president in 2004 on the basis of his opposition to the war in iraq, and war cost -- he's demanding that she live conference because she dare showed skepticism blaming asada for last week's chemical attack attacks. she helped manage hillary's campaign and she knows runs a center for american progress.

she is so outraged that gabbert does not support war in syria that she is called on hawaii's voters to punish her. someday we'll figure exactly how and why the left went crazy but for now it's obvious they decide sending american troops into battle much easier than improving the lives of voters. what is the real state of u.s.-russian relations in these tumultuous times, stephen cohen is a professor emeritus of russian studies at nyu and editor at the nation magazine, professor cohen joins us tonigh tonight. what is the view from russia, what is the russian government to make of everything that's happened last week? >> they think we are crazy, completely crazy. for all the reasons you just discussed with that the guest of yours and what you said about kelsey gabbert. you quoted the russian prime minister dmitry medvedev, i've been doing this for two

years, i don't remember a soviet or post-soviet leader saying this, he said american russian relations are absolutely ruined, ruined. what is important is dmitry medvedev is considered to be the most pro-western member of the putin leadership. he's the guy that obama and clinton try to base the reset o on. your previous guest, i don't mean to be rude to him, but first of all he doesn't know what he's talking about, secondly, he excludes the reality that russia has a politics and the politics of russia today as we talk. the if not the conviction, the concern that america is preparing war against russia. if not in syria, then on the two other cold war fronts. ukraine or the baltic where nato is building up in an unprecedented way.

russia is really, really wound tight and this is not good because they have nuclear weapons and because accidents happen. the one tiny piece of good news is that the new american secretary of state rex tillerson who has been slurred in this country as putin's friend because he made a wonderful deal for exxonmobil, which he headed for russian vast oil reserves under the sea. if the russians and putin in particular know him very well and they never would have made this multibillion-dollar deal with him if they didn't think he was a serious, honorable, and reliable man. two things happened. putin was not supposed to meet with tillerson because a lot of the political class in russia, he did meet with him. i guarantee you, they had a conversation that essentially came down to this.

rex, says putin, what in the world is going on in washington? what is this kremlin gate about that trump is our puppet? and by the way, says putin, there is no evidence and you haven't produced the evidence that assad committed that this chemical weapon act. so something between these two men went on which is exceedingly important for the matter of war and peace and i think what tillerson said afterward and suggested that they did have a candid conversation for it >> tucker: let me ask you a question here. what is the motive particularly on the american left for pushing conflict with russia? this is an utter role reversal from 30 years ago and i find it baffling? what's at the root of it, you've been a man of the left for most of your life, what is this abou about? >> i am like a reformed

alcoholic, i have no memory of my previous life. i don't know what left and right are, they are geography to me. we have issues and what you've been doing on your broadcast shows, you are concerned with issues. what's happened in washington, this attempt to portray trump as a puppet of kremlin's canvassing russia that the american warfare party is behind this. my concern is that russia will overreact. a >> tucker: that seems like a legitimate concern for a country with nuclear weapon. >> i'm not young, i've been doing this for the years, sometimes as a professor, sometimes inside, i have never been as worried as i am today about the possibility of war with russia. >> tucker: those are ominous words and you would hate to think that the root of all this is politically expedient, that would really be a shame and a lot of people would be culpable for that.

thank you very much for joining us. up next, is trump's more aggressive foreign policy sensible? witnesses based think of it? we'll talk to one of his oldest supporters and culture. lansing, michigan, declared itself a sense or sit it just ago, already the city council is panicking and mulling a reversal of that britain welcome back isy of that britain welcome back isy colorful mayor, our proprietary material automatically adjusts to your weight, shape and temperature. so you sleep deeply, and wake up feeling powerful. tempur-pedic sleep is power. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com

♪ >> tucker: update on the

bombing in dortmund germany yesterday which nearly took out players on a top soccer team. after a shorter investigation, german police said they arrested a man who was motivated by radical islam. this is a surprising of course, how can we rationally expect them to commit such a large percentage of the terrorist attacks? it seems to be a remarkable coincidence that they appear to be committing most of them, perhaps they are provoked by something the germans are doing, were going to get to the bottom of that. president trump says he doesn't want american troops in syria, his administration is maneuvering to topple bashar al-assad from power. one of those is ann coulter, she joins us now. nice to see you tonight, wash and it is very focused on this and other foreign policy questions, what should people support with the president thinks in last week?

>> i knew there was going to be massive pushback everything trump proposes to do on immigration, i didn't relist the pushback would be as strong for not starting pointless wars, it's been interesting watching so many of these generals straight out of dr. strangelove pushing for war with syria, war with russia, war with north korea. i thought general mattis' statement was a fantastic yesterday, that seem to be returning to the trump policy on the campaign, how many times a day have the said? is not running of the president of the world, he put our interests first. it's a very hard explain the syrian attack, it's certainly not a vital national security interest, we generally don't at least conservatives don't rushing around the world for humanitarian reasons. for that region of the world,

assad is one of the better leaders, there are probably only one or two better than him. he's not even like a saddam hussain murderous thug. he helped us after 9/11, giving us intelligence. it's a very strange thing we've done here and i feel like it's such a departure from what trump said on the campaign trail. and in 2013 on his twitter feed. >> tucker: that's all true to be fair he did say yesterday unequivocably, we are not sending troops to syria which i think was reassuring to some people. it hasn't lessened the enthusiasm of a lot of people here about getting further involved in one of these wars. why is that what the mark with the motivation behind? do you know? >> for the left and therefore the media, i think it's identical to their motive for wanting to dump the entire third world of the country could they

want to destroy america. if they keep going to war, sending our best americans to these wars, i know it's kind of cliche but it's not the graduates going off to do the fighting? it tends to be the west texas american men doing the fighting and and apparently under the new rules, 14-year-old girls. it will deplete this country if we keep doing these wars, as i point out as i do in today's column it's always destroyed precedence. it's never helped the country we claimed were trying to help. we think were removing a strong minded were helping the people get out from this brutal dictator. within the new tribe comes in, they are always much more brutal than the last tribe and they hate us even more. iraq, egypt, libya, iran, how many times we have to see this isn't working? >> tucker: that's because you didn't go to harvard, so you're

not smart enough to perfectly anticipate the outcome like this whereas they are because you never worked at mckinsey and they did it. let me ask you about your speech coming up at cal berkeley just a few months ago. there was literally a riot, what kind of welcome do you think you're going to get when you go there? >> i just read on breitbart that apparently the administration has essentially shut down a david horowitz speech there, they moved at a mile off campus and it's in the middle of the day where there are classes being held. the sponsor contacted me today you often get these pushback from administrators demanding all kinds of money and security fees and all sorts of other things. maybe i shouldn't be saying this because the sponsors haven't necessarily agreed to my proposal yet. one of the proposals the administration made was limited to students and i think that's not such a bad idea as i said before. the student at these places aren't the ones writing, what we're seeing is the rioters from

ferguson going around to colleges wherever they think it will be fun to smash a starbucks window. >> tucker: that's right. if we wish you luck and i hope this will be your first stop after you get back from there in one piece, thanks for joining us. >> thank you. >> tucker: it last week lansing, michigan, defied the administration by making its office actuary city. tonight they may decide to reconsider. will welcome back to that city's mayor to ask what exactly is going on in with the travelocity customer first guarantee... ...your only worry... ...will be that one... rogue... cloud. get help with hotels, free twenty-four-hour flight changes, and our price match guarantee. travelocity. wander wisely.

parts a and b and want more coverage, guess what? you could apply for a medicare supplement insurance plan whenever you want. no enrollment window. no waiting to apply. that means now may be a great time to shop for an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. medicare doesn't cover everything. and like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, these help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide. it could help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. these types of plans have no networks, so you get to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. rates are competitive,

and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. remember - these plans let you apply all year round. so call today. because now's the perfect time to learn more. go long.

>> tucker: a week ago, we interviewed to the mayor lansing, michigan, regarding his city making itself a sanctuary city, after 168 hours as a sanctuary city, they cal the special meeting happening right now to reconsider this. it could cost them a lot of federal money. he was just at that meeting which is still going on and he joins us now, thanks a lot for coming on. last time we talked, you explained you were going to make lansing heaven on earth, i may be overstating it a little bit, just like a great american city by letting a lot of people, there illegally and work for really low wages. it seems like the city council did in the gray, one then they see the brilliance of your plan? >> i said nothing like that, i think were a great city now. i heard from a lot of your fans

after i came on at you do have a great fan base. what we are seeing saying is democracy in action, this discussion is a part of it, i think we should have more conversations where we shed light and not heat and i appreciate that. that's one thing i appreciate about your show that people get a chance to talk you talk about real issues. counsel is having a real debate, heard from chambers converse, i work with them about growing business all the time in lansing and they are hearing for the people on both sides of the issue. they had months to do this before and they are doing it again now but democracy can be messy. i encourage the debate and i encourage the debate among your listeners as well. >> tucker: i totally agree, why is there any debate. when you have an idea as great as yours just bring in more people illegally, why would anyone object to that? one of the arguments against that? >> with all due respect i know

your bona fides, you are well educated in journalism. there is no evidence that we are opening the floodgates to illegals by declaring it a sanctuary city or declaring nondiscrimination in our policing. it is no evidence that's open the floodgates at all. people heard you say that. >> tucker: you think people won't come? they will. >> i won't give in a city benefits. what we're doing is enforcing the law. a group that you should feel close to the cato institute recently came out with a study that shows in fact undocumented workers have a 44% less likelihood of committing crimes than so-called regular american americans. >> >> tucker: that's a libertarian point of view that there are more impressive than we are and we should be quiet and accept them. >> its research and our policing shows that. the other thing about our last, i do want to talk about.

>> tucker: i'm sure you want to talk about a lot of things i want to back up to what you just said. they are actually more impressive than we are, that's a point of view. >> i never said they were more impressive, there better people than we are, i get it. what if you pass a law protecting the right of actual citizens of lansing saying you have a right to not be the victim of a crime by someone here illegally, looking out for the people who are here illegally, who were born here who didn't sneak in. to think the city council will be opposing on that? i doubt it. >> mr. carlson with all due respect, we do this every day. the brave men and women of our police force every day go out and enforce the law equally, they do not profile, they do not discriminate. if you are breaking the law, you are going to be arrested in lansing, michigan, . we triage, serious crimes are dealt with first. i'm part of the effort our

police department is made. the new statistics of the fbi crime statistics show we have another year of progress. crime is always -- >> tucker: it's a really simple thing. you say that people come here illegally are more morally upright than people who are born here. >> i never said that. you are putting words in my mouth. i said the cato institute's says they commit fewer crimes. >> tucker: if they are so great and the cato institute study i guess proves that they are better than we are, why wouldn't your citizens been so excited to have more illegal aliens in their city? was a david being debated? >> tucker: >> some are excited e century city and some aren't. i wanted to this. your president, our president trump and said he wanted to get rid of the bad hombre spread i said some of the people who angrily came on.

the president said he wanted to get rid of the bad ones, the criminals, the rapists he was talk about. now it seems like they want to go out after every single undocumented worker. no president has tried to do that. i understand president obama deported some people, i'm not saying nobody should be deported. this idea that we're going to deport a ten or 11 million people, folks that are here building a better life, i can't go along with that and i can't allow my police force to be distracted to do immigration enforcement on the behalf of the federal government. and you guys love local control, would have at your local control? >> tucker: i get it. who should be deported? if you are not alerting federal authorities to the presence of illegal aliens in your community, how can they can be deported? >> i hope i don't regret this, i'm quoting president trump. criminals. >> tucker: here's an actual question, let's say the lansing police department picks up an illegal alien for drunk driving. that's a bad thing.

in new york city, that person is not reported to the feds because their policies to protect people who are here illegally before american citizens, would you report a drunk driver here illegally to the feds? >> that's a good question that i don't have the absolute answer to, i would think certainly on a second offense they would. i'm honestly not sure. >> tucker: why aren't you sure, you're the mayor, what's your position on that? why would you not to deport someone who's driving drunk, are you serious? >> i work with the police chief in the city attorney, i'm not a lawyer myself but i did issue the executive order. i'm not sure that a first offense of drunk driving would that we would move the deportation for that? >> tucker: why? >> because if nobody was hurt, if they agreed to go into a program to a diversion program. >> tucker: then it's all cool, if it initially had any kids in a crosswalk.

>> what would we do if you got caught drunk driving? spoon i'd be punished if i was in somebody else's country illegally, -- >> they would be punished like anybody else would be punished. >> tucker: they would be deported to the feds and they might stick around to do it again as many have as you know. maybe your citizens would appreciate it is you thought about them as well as the illegals. >> we think about them every day, that's one of the reasons crime is down. when an extension of the federal government. >> tucker: thank you for joining us. >> you want to local control, we are giving her local control. >> tucker: up next, part three of drugged, the opioid academic ravaging america. america's veterans are the hardest hit in that crisis, much more than you realize. we saw how flying can in fact be hazardous to your health, it's not all bad. one family did manage to make 11

grand by not lying. how can you to get rich by staying home? we've got the story for you coming up.

>> tucker: we want to bring you "drugged" or weeklong series of the opioid epidemic. in particular by the easy availability of opiates america's veterans. >> tucker: jason was a husband and a father, from 19982002, he served as a corporal in the u.s. marine corps. august 30th 2013, he died. it showed his corpse was laced with a lethal cocktail of drugs, including opioids. he was a patient at the va

hospital a place so infamous over prescribing painkillers, veterans referred to it as candyland. the crisis finds its darkest depression and how it finds our veterans. it year after year, doctors at va hospitals over prescribe opioids to vets returning from wars in iraq and afghanistan. the va itself admitted it was blessed of the growing addiction crisis appeared at the va deserves blame. va doctors diagnosed 60% of that's from the plummets of the middle east with chronic pain that compares to 30% for the overall american population. until recently, the va treated a veterans chronic pain almost exclusively with opioid painkillers. prescriptions sorted by 270% over 12 years and easy access to the drugs lead to sky-high addiction rates. the va failures don't stop there. in addition to getting tens of thousands of that's hooked on

synthetic heroin, the va has consistently failed to help them deal with their addictions. consider the va hospital near fayetteville, north carolina, that's not far from fort bragg, the nation's largest military base. 47% of prescription there are abuse, according to "the wall street journal" the va health system and still has no residential addiction treatment program, no in patient detox acacian facility. if there are only five doctors in a 21 county area who are able to dispense medications able to treat overdoses. the consequences of all this, veterans remain hooked on drugs or the turn to private clinics. at one small clinic near fort bragg, for hundreds of veterans line up outside every morning for methadone the drug used to treat their addiction. the land forms at 5:00 every morning. that strategy stomach tragedies not confined to north caroline it plays out across country. american veterans are twice as

likely to die from accidental overdose as nonveterans. last year alone, nearly 70 thousands of them sought treatment for opioid at va hospitals. it's addiction far worse than anything experts in american history. we contacted at the va for a statement they acknowledge that opiate abuse is a serious public health issue of course and they said they launched an initiative to reduce opioid use amongst veterans. they also said more work needs to be done. a veteran that took a job after the va, he became a whistleblower because the terrible practices he observed there, he joins us now. thanks for coming on. >> thanks for having me on. >> tucker: the first number jumped out is 60% of returning vets from the middle east, afghanistan and iraq were prescribed opioids for chronic pain and nearly half of them developed addiction to it of some kind. that number seems crazy, how could 60% -- 60% -- of all

returning vets be given these drugs? >> it's an easy way to mask problems that people are having whether it's in the military or outside of the military. it's easy for doctors to prescribe something that makes their patient feel better, even though it doesn't really take care of their underlying issues that are there. the reason your statistics are right on, why is it that veterans get back from the battlefield and they are dealing with these kind of injuries, they end up in a system, in a bureaucracy like that va and they end up being treated even worse than people being treated because of the opioid epidemic and the rest of society, it's because of the va it's a government bureaucracy is the second-largest bureaucracy bureaucracy in the federal government. veterans are used to being in a system where there is harsh and immediate accountability for actions. when a division commander sees a lower level commander that's doing something wrong, they are

taken care of right away. veterans get thrown into a system where you are dealing with civil service regulations and laws that are archaic and they protect the wrongdoers and you just can't get rid of people. >> tucker: you would think that someone would take the overview at some point. i know that hospitals and hospital systems keep close track of the data and the metrics. 60% of all returning veterans are getting opioids go to market this something wrong. why did nobody reach that obvious conclusion? >> you hit the nail on the head it's about oversight. there is two levels of oversight that need to happen and both of them failed at least in the situation at the va. i speak to whistleblowers across the country and i hear the same thing. the first level of accountability is within the bureaucracy itself, within the va. that accountability just doesn't exist. when you go into a system like that where wrongdoing isn't

checked, any psychologist would tell you that that's going to lead to an environment where unchecked behavior leads to bad consequences. you have that first level of accountability, that's the problem. there's also another level of accountability that's missing here and that's among our political class. that's our elected officials who are supposed to oversee federal bureaucracy like the va. the political class in wisconsin completely failed, you have it senator tammy sitting on a detail and a veteran died and you have congressman ron kind who was getting complaints. it's pew and i've noticed and meanwhile the government just printed an entire generation of addicts, thank you for everything you've done on this topic. were stay out front with tempur-pedic. our proprietary material automatically adjusts to your weight, shape and temperature.

so you sleep deeply, and wake up feeling powerful. tempur-pedic sleep is power. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com

you won't see these folks they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale. go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

>> tucker: we present the most baffling story of the day and he worked at the national security council and the obama administration a did a great job. you're up. it >> my first time too. this is ridiculous coming from clemson university, the school that also banned harrumph a memes because it promotes rate culture and racism, that's where we are starting. they are sending more than $27,000 on diversity training off of professors if you you are a professor at the incentive is you get a cup, a monk or a t-shirt if you sign up for diversity training. it basically games out several scenarios with a powerpoint presentation and the most politically correct answer is the one you're supposed to do.

my favorite is an exchange between maxime and henry and maxine says it's stupid. she think political correctness is stupid that is apparently incorrect, i would to be maxine in this situation and do not henry. there's also another one with alejandra and a couple of different students and one group shows up early and other shows up late and it's somehow racist if you are upset and you ask the other group to apologize for tardy and tardiness because were supposed to recognize other cultures, is it that they are tardy, were supposed to recognize that. >> tucker: punctuality is bigotry. that's their position. >> if you like people to be on time because it's clearly racist. a spin that's clearly insane, can you top that? >> not meant for live television. if >> it's not intuitive, do you have better than that. >> i know you like a good

airline story, everyone is pretension paid attention to united airlines, family of three picked up at laguardia in new york that they got paid $11,000 to voluntarily forgo their flights to florida. they picked up on friday, delta air lines was offering money to people to pump voluntarily get bumped from their fight, there was some big storms in the area or something. they four went to their tickets friday night, came back saturday, sunday there were like we're just canceling the flights. every time they did this each member got $1,350. >> tucker: they had to borrow for today's print >> correct that it was a combination of gift vouchers and cash, they didn't get beat up. >> i'm good have to go, we

actually called clemson and got the statement, they said the point of this exercise on time was simply to raise awareness the concept of time is viewed differently in different cultures. it is the concept of math viewed differently different cultures? >> i would like to thank my family for believing in me that this moment could happen. >> tucker: you get a trophy. thank you for showing up. thank you for showing up. we'll be right [car engine fail] [wind blows] yo- wh- ah- he- [gas pouring] [slurps loudly] [engine starting] [loud slurping continues]

>> tucker: now to news about united airlines which somehow managed in mere days to become the most hated company in america, that took hard work and determination by the way. just today that chicago department of aviation placed two officers on leave for the role of dragging dr. david dao off the flight. a new spotlight is on the case of united passenger jeff hearns, he said he was threatened with handcuffs when he objected to

being bumped from his seat in favor of a higher priority passenger. nobody beat him, he's grateful for that. that's it for us tonight, hannity up next, kids. >> announcer: this is a fox news alert, i'm bret baier in washington. the u.s. relationship with russia is at an all-time low. that is the word from president trump today, echoed by his secretary of state, traveling in russia. foreign policy leading the president's agenda. his top diplomat is in moscow talking with the russians. in the air, near japan, russia flew three jet bombers and a spy plane. that led japan to scramble 14 fighter jets today. back in washington, president trump met with the head of the critical alliance, he once described as obsolete. but now considers essential. at the heart of it all, l