big e-mail bump that came from some anonymous hackers. >> we don't know what's in the emails. >> we will will be here to cover it all. america's news headquarters from new york continues, see you. uma: round one in the battle over health care reform is in the books and now it's on to the senate, where the republican plan faces new challenges, all this as president trump favors his victory in the house and fulfills a promise he made on the campaign trail to repeal and replace obamacare. hello, everyone, welcome to -- wait. where did you come from? >> i knew she was going to do that. [laughter] >> is this the run for the roses, the kentucky derby. >> the second person that made fun. i didn't know you were off to prom. anyway. greg: more on that later.

it could get muddy here too. i'm gregg jarrett, the house voting to approve the gop plan letting president trump and the republicans take a victory lap in the rose garden. now the fight shifts to the u.s. senate where lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are getting ready to express their deep concerns about this measure, some have already. brian live from new jersey where the president is spending the week and brian, i'm guessing he may swing a golf club or two today. [laughter] >> well, no confirmation on that and it could rain, in fact. we will see, gregg, good afternoon to you. this is a situation where the president is optimistic about this house health care bill but like you said, the senate and others democrats, senate republicans an democrats less optimistic about this bill particularly because it's senate republican that is are speaking out against this bill primarily

for two reasons, one is the premeditated, i'm sorry, in terms of preexisting conditions, this health care bill states that states have the options of opting out of actually -- opting out of an option in this health care bill that would mean that medicaid -- that the american health care act would give states the option of allowing insurance companies to charge more for preexisting conditions and others like ohio senator rob portman, they don't support the current bill because it would cut medicaid for millions of americans, millions of americans who now have insurance because of the expansion of medicaid under obamacare, but despite all of this, the president had an optimistic weekly address in which he actually spoke about his next piece of legislation, tax reform and he also told the senate that he expects this to get done meanwhile the white house says they believe that this bill will probably see changes in the senate but they expect the heart of this bill to stay intact. listen. >> and now i'm calling on the

senate to take action, repealing and replacing obamacare will be a big, big win for the american people. >> we expect there to be some changes, but we expect the principles and the main pillars to remain the same. >> so the white house acknowledges that there's going to be changes but as long as the three pillars that they mention at the press brief yesterday, stay intact. the markets stay competitive, that there are lower costs for all members and it gives states flexibility to decide how they stew health care in their states. as long as that stays intact, they'll be okay with the final bill, whatever that looks like. ultimately, though, earlier, the former trump adviser corey lewandowsky don't just wait the senate to take care of this.

he will take an active role. take a listen. >> he's going to be working the phones, meeting with individuals in the u.s. senate. he will get piece of legislation done. if he's required to go out and campaign and get on the stump like he did last weekend to push bill forward to make sure he can get repeal and replace done, he will do that. he can go directly to the american people and put pressure on those u.s. senators who aren't willing to hold to their promise to get repeal and replace done. >> meanwhile the president continues to have meetings and phone calls all this weekend but there are also some protests, a protrump rally and antitrump rally just 4 miles away at golf club in new jersey behind me. as for the timetable for this deal, the white house is saying they are are not looking to rush it. they haven't given a timetable yet.

greg: brian, thanks very much. >> i know that our friends over in the senate are eager to get to work. [laughter] >> they are. we are going to see that work through, you know why we are going to see this work through because the issues are too important. the stakeses are just too high. the problems facing american families are real. >> and there you heard house speaker paul ryan encouraging colleagues in senate to take action in health care. the house approved gop bill will likely face major tweaking or rewrite when it gets there. joining me gary palmer of alabama, member of the house freedom caucus, first i'd like your opinion on this health bill, what did you think of it? >> well, it's no a perfect bill but it's a good bill and a lot of the talking points that the democrats are using and some of the colleagues in senate are listening to are just flat out

wrong. this bill takes care of people with preexisting conditions, it doesn't take people off of medicaid, what it does it freezes the medicaid expansions but this is a bill that's going to take care of the american people and i believe it will bring down premiums. >> okay, so let's first talk about preexisting conditions. how is it going to take care of preexisting conditions? are you talking about the tax credits that will make up for the increased premiums if you have a preexisting condition? >> no, we put $138 billion in this bill, there was a 100 billion to begin with but we added 30 billion, 38 billion actually to cover a risk-sharing arrangement that this model after the state of maine. that was the palmer amendment and what this does is allows people to buy insurance just like anybody else regardless of preexisting condition and it's backed up by the federal and visible risk pool, the program

that we have set up and anyone who wants insurance can get it regardless of the preexisting condition so the narrative out there that this doesn't cover people with preexisting condition is false. >> the narrative is the concern that if you have a preexisting condition that you will now pay for more it. 20 republicans voted no and that enclouds colorado congressman mike hoffman basically that while premiums may decrees for healthy people, they could skyrocket with those with preexisting conditions and senior citizens, is that true? >> no, that's not true. if we had a group called milliman do analysis and premiums are going to come down for everybody. the insurance companies have zero incentive to raise premiums

for people who have a preexisting condition. if we set up like maine did, the people who buy policies who have preexisting conditions, 90% of the premiums go into fund this risk-sharing arrangement. uma: i first want to talk about the preexisting conditions and seniors because apparently pregnancy is going to be considered a preexisting condition, that regarding that and also the aarp. a 55-year-old earning $25,000 could see payment increases north of 2300 of that per year. that number gets even higher for older americans and this is according to the congressional budget office and those are the numbers that a lot of american citizens who are not making over $200,000 a year are worried about. >> julie, the cbo projection was

based on the bill, this was after they scored the bill. i don't know where the other group is getting the information. if you read the amendment and you read what we have done, we have $38 billion in this bill to make sure that people with preexisting conditions are treated like everybody else and, you know, we emphasize over and over but i suggest the people take a look at the bill, take a look at what we have done. i think what they are going to see is that we have kept our promise, a promise by the president and promise of many of us that we are not going to exclude people with preexisting conditions and not put them in a situation where they can't afford their insurance. julie: do you believe there's any confusion on exactly what is in it because the final version of the legislation was posed late wednesday night that it gave lawmakers very little time to read hundreds of pages before vote thursday afternoon and some have add -- admitted that they didn't read through the whole thing and i'm wonder if they

noticed cuts in medicaid could potentially mean 14 million people will be dropping off of medicaid due to major cuts. >> well, the bill is only 200 pages and they could have read it and there are no cuts to medicaid. i said that earlier, julie, that what we did is freeze medicaid expansion. there's no cuts to medicaid. we give the states the options to taking medicaid funding either per capita cap or block grant. we did that, i'm one of the guys who pushed for that, it's because we sent billion dollars in improper to payments to medicare, money wasted through fraud, mismanagement. we want to be able to give more money to the people that need help, elderly, disabled and children and i don't know why people continue to press this false narrative that we are going to take people off of medicaid. julie: okay, i think that a lot of people are concerned because,

of course, people within congress are also questioning some of these, you know, preexisting conditions and medicaid and so forth and any time that you hear medicaid cuts and premiums rising obviously the american people are concerned and it's not just coming from media, it's coming from washington. but congressman, gary palmer, thank you for trying to clear it up for us, we appreciate it. thank you. >> happy to, thanks, julie. greg: newly hacked emails from french presidential candidate emmanuel macron now surfacing everywhere online. it comes hours before voters head to the polls in run-off in france's presidential election between macron and nationalist candidate marine la pen. greg palkok live in paris following it all. >> reporter: dejavu all over again.

thousands of emails and documents from his campaign posted online, most of them material said to be routine but according to authorities here it's been combined with fake news items and it seems to sway election, russia in the past has been suspected in meddling in macron's campaign and even in the united states have been spreading the word. so far no sign of an impact on leader macron, remember he's a centrist, independent, reformer, proeu, pronato and he has something like a 20% lead over far right populist candidate marine la pen. she is antieu, antiimmigrant. now there's a scheduled ban on political activities today so authorities are trying to keep a lid on this leak but the campaign manager for la pen tweeted some positive comments earlier today, la pen's positive tone about russia and support coming from moscow have some people thinking about the russian connection again

reminiscent of alleged russian role of tampering in hillary clinton's campaign last year. we spoke with some folks on the street and here in liberal paris we heard a lot of support more macron but in the french heartland where the economy is stagnant, unemployment high, the la pen message, the nationalist message playing very well. we also did hear from some people who they call neither or no voters, people who will go to the polls but leave a blank ballot unhappy with both candidates. now, remember, there is no major party candidate running in this run-off, they got knocked out in the first round of the election. but this is so important that major u.s. figures have stepped in this past week, former president obama taped a video message supporting macron in the past we have heard president trump speaking kindly about la pen, just yesterday, the white house said whoever wins tomorrow, they will work with, considering the way polls have gone and this unpredictable political season in the past

many months, we are not predicting anything. back to you, gregg. greg: it could be really close, hard to tell. greg palkot with the eiffel tower in the background. great to see you, thank you. julie: a police officer in suburban dallas charged with murder for fatally shooting a black teenager last weekend. officer roy oliver was respond to go a or the of underage drinking when he fired his rifle into a car that was leaving a party killing 15-year-old jordan edwards. will live in dallas bureau with more, hi, will. >> hey, there julie, former officer roy oliver turned himself last night and posted a 300,000-dollar bond, oliver was a 6-year veteran with the balch springs police department and accused of shooting jordan in

the head. oliver responded to house party and thought they heard gunshots in the area and saw a car filled with five teenagers leaving party. after reviewing body camera video the chief said the car was actively driving away from the officers, that resulted in oliver being fired tuesday and charged one day before edwards is set to be layed to rest. >> a little bit of the burden is starting to lift because it's a complicated situation. you're battling losing a child, having to prepare the arrange noapts lay him to rest yet in the back of your mind you're still wondering what's going to happen to my child's killer, what is going to happen to him. >> oliver isn't the only officer making national headlines this week, on tuesday south carolina

police pled guilty of shooting unarmed black man in the back and wednesday the department of justice decline today charge two white officers, louisiana attorney general could still proceed with state charges in that case and here in texas authorities really moved quickly with charges in this case and julie, that may have helped diffuse a lot of tension building here in dallas over the past week. julie: all right, will carr, thank you very much. greg: helicopter goes down, coming up, how a tour of the sky suddenly turn intoed a fiery wreck. and russia wants to ban military aircraft over so-called syrian safe zones. well, what about u.s. bombers? will it affect the u.s. war on isis? >> the president expressed desire to achieve peace in syria. i think that's the broader mission and we are looking at all ways in order to achieve that and we haven't layed out

any specifics any further than that at this point

julie: time for a quick check

for the headlines, hour long standoff near boston finally

coming to end this morning. a man accused of shooting an officer was found dead in motel room. that officer underwent surgery and expect today recover. a sight-seeing helicopter crashing in southern california. authorities say a mechanical issue was to blame. all three people on board suffered moderate injuries but fortunately survived. country music loretta lynn recuperating from a stroke, her website says she was hospitalized earlier this week but is responsive and should make a full recovery. greg: the united states dismissing a new deal to stop military aircraft from flying over so-saúled safe -- so-called safe zones in syria. the united states is not part of the united states which was hammered out by the united states, russia, turkey and iran. joining us now ben collins,

former green beret, served three tours in afghanistan. great to have you with us. russia has allegedly activated a no-fly zone. i think they did it at midnight last night but they haven't worked out any of the details nor the enforcement of it but if u.s. war planes fly into the no-fly zone, is that setting up a dangerous military confrontation with the russians? >> well, it certainly could, gregg, as you said, the devil is going to be in details. after the air strike in syria, russia and the united states had closed off that channel of communication between the -- the air control and so i think as far as i understand it, they've reopened that channel and that's going to be extremely important because, you know, at the time when you have american planes and russian planes and other countries planes all flying, it has to be deconflicted.

i don't think that russia would go as far as to shoot down certainly an american aircraft, but i don't think that any part of this deal is going to keep us from still flying and targeted isis and al-qaeda affiliates as we should. greg: that was my next question. explain how it would be possible for the united states continue its bombing campaign of isis targets if they happen to be within those prohibiting safe zones, the pentagon is saying that they'll be able to do it and it will have no effect on its air campaign. do you agree with that? >> well, again, i think the details of this are going to have to get worked out, i mean, these are two different things when you're talking about a safe zone which is where they want to establish some -- some, you know, focal point for civilians to be -- to be able to go so they can have protection, they can get food and water and medical and then the air, you

know, the air routes for targeting. now, again, i think this is literally, you know, going to have to be trust and verify. so date we have seen nothing and just about everything in the russia and certainly syria have done against international legal norms in terms of using chemical weapon, in terms of targeting medical supplies. so are they going to stick and enforce those now. i think we have to wait and see and i think that we will start moving into this new -- this new arraignment in phases. greg: what complicates it certainly is that we are not just fighting isis, apparently the safe zones would impact u.s. air strikes against al-qaeda positions specially those up in that northern province where al-qaeda tends to dominate. as i looked at the proposal today on a map, it looks like that entire northern province would be a safe zone, so arguably this would interfere in

our ability to go after al-qaeda. >> and i don't think we are going to let that happen, gregg, i think we will still continue to target isis and certainly those al-qaeda affiliates that exist within there, but to your point, it shows the complexity of this. you know, the very fact that you look at the three countries that have agreed to this deal and that is russia, turkey and iran, but you also have to look at didn't agree to this deal so far and that's the syrian government itself and the rebel opposition. so again, safe zones is something that people can say but we have a horrible history of actually making those work. greg: very hard to enforce. >> extremely hard to enforce and the idea that the iranian malicious would be a part of this, that would be the shiite fox guarding the hen house. greg: one wonders if this is going to lead to a defacto of

syria and if that's good or bad for the united states, we will leave that for another day. ben collins, thank you so much for being with us today. >> thank you, gregg, great to be with you. julie: republicans celebrating passing of health care bill but some republicans saying they should be worried. >> they have the vote tattooed on them. this is a scar they will carry. so it's their vote, it's not the senate vote. it's their vote they are taking. julie: the impact the bill could have in next year's midterms and hold onto your hats, a live look to this each's 143rd running of kentucky derby. >> who is your pick? >> whose dreaming. julie: my memoir. we will have more. [laughter]

80 percent of recurrent ischemic strokes

could be prevented with the right steps. and take it from me, every step counts. a bayer aspirin regimen is one of those steps in helping prevent another stroke. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen.

>> they have this tatod on them. this is a scar they will carry. it's their vote. it's not the senate vote. it's their vote they are taking and so that's really a poor choice, cowardly choice, i might add. why would they vote for it if they don't think it's worthy? gregg: house minority leader nancy pelosi on the gop health care bill and potentially lingering affects, the bill passes giving republicans and president victory but some people are wondering how could this bill really impact the gop's in next year's midterm election. for more now joined by josh who is politics editor at the national journal. josh, good to see you. you know, in the beginning obamacare was seriously unpopular but a funny thing happened over seven years, people sort of got used to it

and it reached the threshold of 50% and above approval rating, so if in the end congress gets rid of it, i mean, could that turn out to be a job-killer for republican incumbents in 2018? >> well, this house vote was a political down payment on the promises republicans have made for years and years about repealing and replacing obamacare, the health care law. the big question is how much of a down payment is it, how much political capital will republicans end up spending and could they lose the house, could they lose the house majority as a result and if you talked to republican strategists, there's a lot of nervousness because president trump and a lot of the congressional republican leadership didn't do a very good job selling this bill publicly. they certainly dealt with it behind closed doors but in terms of making the case for why this is a better alternative to obamacare, they came up short and polls didn't back that up. gregg: they did a bad job in

selling the last republican bill and was exceptionally unpopular. only 17% supported it. 56% opposed it. this one could have the same lack of support, josh, is that because as i mentioned over seven years, you know, americans kind of grew dependent on obamacare and dependent increasingly on government? >> well, look, people like the status quo no matter what you do. no matter you change the law it's going to make people nervous. the big problem with obamacare in addition to policy, the law got more unpopular as president obama was trying to sell it. in the case of trumpcare, the republican legislation, they didn't even try to sell it. they didn't even try to make the case to the public to bring them on board even though there were a lot of people that don't like obamacare and feel like their premiums have gone up and health care have gotten worse, if you're not taking step one to sell legislation, you'll not do a very good job.

gregg: 70% are against ending guarantied coverage for preexisting conditions and, you know, josh, as you know, that's important because there is this false narrative that is running ramped on the internet that was absolutely dead wrong. you know that the gop replacement ends coverage for preexisting conditions. it doesn't. so have republicans been poor in their messaging here and should they be faulted for that? >> yeah, republicans have been afraid of their own shadow and trying to make the case for their own legislation. they want to decrease regulation, they want to reduce the amount of mandates and free up businesses and people -- middle-class people who are healthy and have seen premiums go up quite a bit but they haven't made that case, they haven't been honest about the trade-offs necessary as part of

this legislation and, you know, because they haven't been honest and candid an up front and they are trying to sell people that this is all good and there are no trade-offs, they haven't convinced the american public. gregg: i'm not sure if people are ignorant but it doesn't end coverage for preexisting conditions or whether there's a deliberate information, disinformation campaign out there to benefit democrats, hard to tell at this juncture, but, look, there are -- i looked this up, 23 house republicans that come from districts that voted for hillary clinton, 14 of those republicans voted for this replacement bill, are those the people that are at serious risk of losing their jobs? >> these are the people who are worried the most as a result of this house vote and the big question is, a lot of these districts are traditionally republican seats that saw a swing away from their party in the last election, suburban, affluent types of districts, republicans have always done very well.

the big question is, does this legislation which actually benefits small -- it could benefit small businesses, it's good for people who are healthy and middle class, upper-middle class, would they feel personally that the law is going to affect them personally or do they think it's not big of a deal, these are seats that are usually friendly to republicans. gregg: great to see you, josh. >> thank you. gregg: more on gop health care bill, be sure to tune in reince priebus will be sitting down exclusive interview with chris wallace at 2:00 and 10:00 p.m. eastern, right here on the fox news channel. julie: 143rd running of kentucky derby kicks off later today and there's a lot of hard work going into the preparations and also for dressing to report on this story. janice dean is live from churchill downs. gregg: oh, my. julie: forget about the jockies

and all the work and training, i mean, how did you score that hat? how long did it take you to pick this outfit out, that's the story. gregg: hello, dolly. janice: hello there gregg and julie. they hand-crafted these hats and, of course, here at the kentucky derby it's all about fashion, it's all about horses, it's all about the mint, what health happens on the stables and i did that yesterday, take a look. rain, sleet, thunder, snow, the kentucky derby is the place to go. it takes a lot of hard work to get this derby kentucky worthy so let's make sure this track is ready. ♪ ♪ ♪ janice: hee-haw!

♪ ♪ ♪ janice: now that we have seen the track gets ready, let's go see how the horses are doing. >> you are a trainer here at churchill downs, how long have you been doing it for? >> training for 30. '73, captured my imagination. january genuine my producers on "fox & friends" want me to get down and dirty and do some of the jobs that make this place special. >> we are going to lek you muck out a stall here. >> i don't know how i'm going to do this. ♪ ♪ ♪ janice: i think he wants to be on tv, yes, you do. >> the tools of the trade. janice: this horse is more high-maintenance than i am. three different brushes. >> the brain of the hair and

work your way all the way to the back. janice: he likes it. he's beautiful. aww. >> you're ready to be a groom. janice: all right, race time coming up at 6:46 we cannot wait. do i need to place bets for julian and gregg. gregg: always dreaming for julie because that's the story of her life. i will take irish work hog. janice: fantastic. i am going to go bet. july yul how much do we win? gregg: two bits for julie. janice: you know what i will do i will have mint julips. [laughter] julie: thank you, janice. gregg: one city council using

money for illegals to fight deportation. should that be allowed? coming up next. >> we deserve to give everyone a chance. >> administration come and go but pain and suffering is lifelong. >> when you come to america you are a criminal then. at red lobster's seafood trios

you don't have to choose just one thing. choose your trio with any 3 of 9 selections for $15.99. like new creamy lobster pasta toasted parmesan shrimp and southern-style crab cakes. come create your trio before it ends.

time's up, insufficient we're on prenatal care.es. and administrative paperwork... your days of drowning people are numbered. same goes for you, budget overruns. and rising costs, wipe that smile off your face. we're coming for you, too. for those who won't rest until the world is healthier, neither will we. optum. how well gets done.

julie: sacramento council voting this morning, $300,000 will go to nonprofit groups that provide legal services and civil rights education. sacramento's mayor supporting the decision. listen. >> these undocumented imgreapts generate about $30 million worth of property and sales tax revenue. this is not about protecting

people who have been accused of or committed serious crimes. >> let's bring in janine and kathy, author of latina wisdom cohost of red mom, blue mom. >> let's start with the allocation of these funds because under president trump he does not want sanctuary cities to exist. here you have a town in california that says, okay, if you are not going to allow sanctuary cities, we are going to go ahead and spend our own money to protect illegal immigrants, is this first of all, the right to be spending government funds? >> i think it's outrageous abuse of taxpayer dollar and not only that, julie, i think what they are doing is a disservice to our country because what they are doing is going around with what president trump wants to do in terms of protecting americans, protecting our liberties, our freedoms and, listen, this money -- what they are trying to do, i think a lot of people are

totally against it, they look at it as twisted priorities, all right, because it sends the wrong incentives for other individuals to come across our borders illegally, they know they'll be protected in sanctuary cities and they'll have the money to pay for legal services which will be used against our laws. i think it's wrong. julie: what message does this send to other people in other countries that say, hey, here we have free boarding, basically. do i come over illegally? is that an incentive? >> they are actually paying taxes. the undocumented, people pay, $300,000 to not help separate families is going for families to stay together. so nothing is a drop in the bucket. $300,000 when they are putting $30 million into the economy and in california alone they are putting -- they're putting $3 billion in taxes in

california alone. julie: some might say that this is an investment, that the city is creating more workers. >> i think this is doing a disservice to the community and to our country. as a matter of fact, we give billions of dollars in aid to méxico to the tune of $320 million, excuse me, the mexican consulate turns and and uses that funding against our laws because they use that money to apply to people to fight against our laws here on the books. people should come to america legally, they should not provide safe harbor to individuals that are here illegally. a lot of americans are against it. that money could be used for our veterans, our veterans are suffering on a daily basis, they should be taken care of. take care of americans first and foremost. julie: taxpayer ice has rounded up more than 41,000 people in taxpayer detention centers under trump. how is immigration big money for the government? >> well, big money for the government $100 million awarded

to someone to create -- to a private company, taxpayer money to create a detention center. creating detention centers to put illegal immigrants, undocumented citizens and undocumented into and these people are actually proven guilty until proven innocent, that's so un-american. we are getting 300,000 in sacramento and they are paying millions into the economy. >> as far as deportation anybody who commits a crime has to be at the top of the list of deportation is concerned, but let's just put aside the criminals an talk about those who have come here and perhaps had children here and those babies were born in the country. >> right. julie: under the trump mechanics a private-prison company won a government contract for a 100 million-dollar. >> taxpayer money. julie: we haven't heard about that $100 million. that's quite a large bill. is there money in the budget to pay for such a thing? >> that i'm not familiar with.

my overall message is you should come here legally. don't break the law and expect to be taken care of or expect to just be here in our country without being documented and not doing it the right way. listen, we don't know who is coming into our country. we have a lot of gang activity. we have the ms-13 gang that is are coming here and hanging out in the sanctuary cities because they know they can stay there, they know that they can't be thrown out and i think that's a disservice to our entire country because i think safety and security of americans first. that should be at the top of the list. >> sadly taxpayer people, they are paying their taxes so everyone is benefiting from the billions of dollars that they are paying. >> the individuals are a burden -- >> but they are working, they wouldn't be here unless they are working. >> there are a lot of illegals that are not paying tacks an riding the system. has an emergency and has to go to the emergency room, they actually get free health care whereas a poor american citizen who goes to the hospital and has

to give birth and doesn't have health insurance, they are in big trouble. >> it is a problem that needs to be addressed. julie: thank you very much to both of you, gregg. gregg: manhunt underway in las vegas after a father of five killed with one fatal punch new bike? yeah, 'cause i got allstate. if you total your new bike, they replace it with a brand new one. that's cool. i got a new helmet. we know steve. it's good to be in (good hands). to f...nerve pain shoots and burns its way into your day... ...i hear you.

when that pain makes simple errands simply unbearable... ...i hear you. i hear you because my dad struggled with this pain. make sure your doctor hears you too. so folks, don't wait. step on up. and talk to your doctor. because you have places to go... ...and people who can't wait for you to get there. if you have diabetes and burning, shooting pain in your feet or hands... step on up and talk to your doctor today.

gregg: welcome back, investigators try to find two suspects after policeman killed father of five with a single punch outside las vegas nightclub. two suspects seen on surveillance video tape walking away from the scene. jonathan hunt has more. on then. >> hey, greg, lou campos was waiting outside of las vegas nightclub excited to be with brothers looking forward to one of them getting married. a wedding in which lou was going to be the best man. >> he was so happy to be with us, you know, we are all close brothers, but this is the first time we got to really hang out together. >> minutes later everything had changed, these two men seen on a nearby security camera

approached the campos brothers and one allegedly threw unprovoked punch that 45-year-old lou a father of five died in the hospital having never regained consciousness. [inaudible] >> it broke my heart. his kids. it's the worst -- when he was born it was the happiest time in my life and now the same child, it's the saddest thing of my life. >> now, his family wants justice and a family that was planning a wedding is now preparing for a funeral. gregg. gregg: sad story. julie: president trump and house gop leader marking a major milestone but how will the

republican bill fair in the senate? is it dead on arrival? next.

julie: well, something i will never achieve. the two-hour marathon. the feet has never been done before but today someone came closer than ever. elliot set a new record marathon time of 2 hours and 24 -- 24

seconds. gregg: you can do it in ten hours? >> actually my last marathon was four hours and 45 seconds. gregg: really in -- that must have been years ago, right? julie: that does it for us. ♪ ♪ ♪ paul: today was a big day but it's just one step in this process, an important step, we still have a lot of work to do to get this signed into law but i know that our friends in the senate are eager to get to work. paul: welcome to the journal editorial report, i'm paul gigot . the house narrowly passed a bill to repeal and replace obamacare and the plan as it stands faces long odds in the senate. president trump says the process has serve today -- served to unify the party. >> this has brought the republican