were foolish enough to follow their lead. donald trump once noted that the chinese are laughing at us and they have been more right than he knew. good night from washington. here's be one. >> hello everyone, i'm's ph and this is to be one. we begin tonight with breaking news, "the new york times" this evening reporting that trump suggested that then fbi director james call me that he drop the bureau's investigation into former national security officer michael flynn. according to the times, and february, he told comey "i hope you can let this go," citing a memo written by mr. comey. the white house said the report is not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the president and mr. comey, proponents of the president are saying this new information is stunning evidence of obstruction of justice. it's the second straight night we've had breaking news about the president, and joining us

with more is chief local inker bret baier. i noticed that you tweeted early on when this story broke about 15 minutes later that comey was a known notetaker writing detailed member memos. this may be the tip of an iceberg. i'd like free to talk about that and also were going to take over questions. my question is the post, citing anonymous sources it says that attorney general jeff sessions and john earl attorney rosenstein said they had seen the memo but if they had written a memo that trump said originally was the reason for the firing of jim call me. i was wondering if you had been able to track any of that down between a 6:00-9:00 which is not a lot of time. >> first of all, good evening, good to be with you. here's what we know. and it's important, in these environments, to deal in facts. what we know to be a fact from fbi sources and sources of department of justice is that comey, the former fbi director met with trump february 14th,

the day after michael flynn was fired. after that meeting, we know that he took very detailed notes. a very detailed memo, we are told, and that he was uncomfortable. but we don't have independently of "the new york times" is the quote from the memo, as they report, that president trump says to call me, i hope you can find a way to bring this to an end. in other words, the investigation of michael flynn. we also don't know what the extent of the memos, and how many memos there are, and what exactly is in them. we do know another fact that the acting fbi director testified on capitol hill that there is no known interference from the white house or anyone else in the fbi investigation, that nothing has slowed the fbi agents that are doing the investigation. also, rosenstein, the deputy attorney general testified to the same thing. so i think where we are, until

we get more confirmation or actually see the memo, is really, where senator richard burr is, the chair of the senate intelligence committee, for he said tonight, i need to see more than just anonymous sources her here. he met with comey the day before he was fired. he and senator warner from virginia, the two chairs of the senate intelligence committee, they said he didn't say anything about this. he didn't tell them one thing, and he got very detailed in what he did tell them. he says, verse says, you would think he would say something if this is truly what happened. he didn't, clearly, say much to anyone as far as we can tell. >> we know he's been invited to testify so maybe then we'll be able to cut those answers. we'll take it around the table and start with jesse. >> i'm gonna put a little water's world spent on this story. i'm not gonna do the thing. that was a nice attempt. you've been practicing, i could

tell. if i went out tomorrow in the street and i asked ten people who james call me was i probably get maybe three, may be for who knew, depending on the neighborhood. this is a scandal with no video, with no audio, with no sets, with no money, with no dead bodies. it's a boring scandal. no one knows the deputy ag's name, no one can pronounce the russian defense minister's name. >> i can. speak of theirs memos, and which memo, who sent what memo to hu, no one is emotionally invested or can even understand this story. do we think we are losing sight of what the rest of the country thinks and feels about something like this >> listen. i think that you're right in that there is a large section of the country that would like washington to work on something else. but it is a big story. i mean, potentially, potentially, if you have the president asking the fbi

director to move away from an investigation, an investigation where he is told that he's not a target but yet is investigating the campaign, and ties or collusion possibilities with russia, that is a big deal. >> did obama say it publicly the irs situation wasn't that big of a deal? or that hillary's secret server didn't put any lives at risk for didn't jeopardize that? everybody blew that off. >> you're right. trey gaudi denied and mentioned that saying that comey did not come forward the four times he said president obama stepped in front of investigation, namely that hillary clinton email server investigation by saying it was no big deal. you're right, and there is hypocrisy here, however, right now, in this environment, as the stories come out day by day, there are elements of truth to them. some of them have fallen apart but some of them are describing

a white house that is in a tough spot and is in a chaotic moment. >> bob. >> jesse, the four people you interviewed are probably from nigeria. let me ask, let's go to some facts. the fact is that they had dinner together, the fact is that comey does keep these memos, he's a lawyer and he gave detailed information on them, and the fact is somebody in the cia leak set out to "the washington post." the fact is that the white house says no, so that means either trump or comey is lying, right? speak of that is true. >> when jesse says it is not a big deal, the president of the united states to be positive, obstruction of justice is clearly an impeachable offense. speak or you make that claim.

you can make that because, they've all ready got the letter that went out tonight that went out to the fbi to say we need to see these memos. you're already hearing calls for the so-called tapes that the president referenced in that tweet and the white house has not talked about since. either the tapes themselves or transcripts, and i think you're going to see more and hear more calls for a special prosecutor or special commission and that republicans may start getting to that spot. >> a long way to go. speak too what about them saying that there are copious notes? i imagine it will be a request for those notes but what i'm curious about is, if this is a situation that was developing at that time, why didn't director comey say anything about it? why are we hearing about it after he's been dismissed from his position? the question that i would look at as a former prosecutor to say, what is the motive here,

how valid is this information, why wasn't it extemporaneous, happening after the time if he thought it was problematic versus waiting in the aftermath for something like this to then get leaked out. >> i agree with you. that's a big question. i think the memos, as far as we can tell and from what sources are telling us were kind of contemporaneous at the time, dated and marked every time he talked about something. with the big figure like the president on big items. however, why did he step up? "the new york times" reports it was a close circle at the fbi who knew, but there wasn't an obstruction that was tested by the acting fbi director mccabe or the deputy attorney general rosenstein who wasn't there at the time but clearly had the information about the doj and how the investigation was going. that is the question. >> in terms of when i would call for evidence in front of the jury, for something like this, if you have electronic reporting or something that can be

authenticated in terms of this veracity, time, date stamp, that's one thing. but if somebody is writing a note, i can write a note here and i can backdate it and say well, i made this and these are a series of my notes that were contemporaneous at the time. but nevertheless you can't necessarily accept it for the truth of the matter if you can't authenticate the time that it was actually produced. >> i agree with you. i think his documents were kind of see used or locked down the day he was fired. and we'll have to get into the process of what exactly happened with those memos. >> an interesting question. >> it seems like i see you every day now. breaking more news. according to this memo, he said i hope you let him go or i hope you can let this go. when you say you hope for something it's not a command. it's not saying you better do this. it's like saying, i hope i get a bicycle for christmas and i

really hope you show up to my birthday party or really hope that you won't make loud noises when i'm sleeping. it's a hope, it's not a command. so in my mind, and i know that this isn't yet a question, it seems like it's not a big deal which is may be why he didn't think it was obstruction, so he didn't have to comply to reporting it because he knew that what he was doing is what he does. everything to him is like visiting a construction site. it's not what a politician says or does. he doesn't understand the, how internal stuff works and when he shows up he's like you know, i wish we could do this for cheaper. i wish we didn't use these kinds of lights and these bathrooms. it seems to me that this is just how he speaks and he understood that this is how he speaks. therefore he didn't feel like it was required to tell the department of justice of any attempt to obstruct justice. i think i just explain the story

better than anybody on the planet. >> may be you dead. steve helton on our panel was very similar in our thoughts. but you are much better. speak out he had an accent. >> basically the outsider mentality, the developer mentality, and that he hasn't been around washington to know them and however, i don't think it takes away from the import of this series of stories in the white house kind of dealing with all of it at once. >> i was trying to take the import out of it. >> i know you are. speaker and exported periods because it was a good try. speaker thank you so much. were going to keep talking here but thank you so much. kimberly, though, do you remember when comey had the whole thing into thousand four about the reauthorization of the nsa program and he goes to the bedside of john ashcroft and he said i'm uncomfortable with this and there is the chief of staff the white house counsel and he

actually documented those things then. that's one of the reason that all those things, as i understand, it was like a memo to file, like a contemporary utterance so he documented all of this. it could be that he has times when he talked to president obama, too. i don't know if he'll say that, but is it totally inadmissible to have something like that? i thought that was good evidence. >> absolutely isn't. he would say is it admissible, can we authenticate it? the point you bring up our god, that they would argue, to say look, this is someone that is in the pattern or practice in authenticating and putting forward these documents. you see that there is a serious but then it begs the question well, if you're going to put forward these documents as it relates, let see the documents about president obama and the different times that you decided to come alike, you know, look the other way even though you would have perhaps an idea or a feeling of obstruction of justice. why now is this coming forward, who is leaking this information against the president to try to

make it seem like we don't know. that's what they have investigations far. i don't know what you're laughing about. in the wake of director comey being fired by the president then all of a sudden we get this oh, yeah, bad on you, you tried to obstruct justice. these are questions that need to be asked. >> they need to be asked but if you go back, you guys have got to move forward. this is not something you can keep going backs too. speak what you got to move forward from the election. >> i've accepted the fact that he's president of the united states, barely, but he is president of the united states. >> he was president five months ago so it actually is relevant because part of this story leads back into the presidency of barack obama. speaker now wait a minute. it looked. if you are comey and he did not reveal that fact about the obstruction of justice, that was a good try, greg, but you could call dirt, anything else you want, and he said take it easy on my boy.

that's obstruction of justice. that's when you would say i would hope. that's not the same, it's just not. if you understand language it's just not. speak up but it is. >> if it was and he would believe it to be obstruction and he didn't. this is very "mean girls" by the way. very "mean girls" >> that's a great example. he was fired. it was an aggressive act that trumpeted in the open. comey did it behind closed doors. he did it in secret. he had a friend read the memo. that's "mean girls." he said you're fired, you're not even here, and it's public. that's because there was a tape of that discussion. that came out. that means he obstructed justice. i don't care how you look at it, it's gone.

you've got to be worried about it. that's a good point. >> you made a good point. i think he is a little bit of a drama queen. he goes to the bedside. he puts this huge fight with apple after san bernardino. he gets fired, he's always interfering with hillary and then on the eve of the election, it's always about him. >> what i've noticed is every law enforcement officer says he's a terrific guy. >> a lot of people are pretty happy he left. speak what they're saying he's a professional. speak and he's very and comprehensive. leave it alone, man. >> i think having a friend read the memo -- go >> you read the memo. speak up but he had no problem when he was assuming the role of loretta lynch and stepping in as judge, jury, prosecutor and saying there will be no charges

against hillary clinton, there is insufficient evidence and adding an element of the crime that does not exist. >> what does that have to do with this? speaker you're saying that he's a shining example and beacon of purity and that donald trump tried to obstruct justice but you don't have proof of it. speaker that's not going to stand up in a court of law. the fact is that he can obstruct justice. >> i'm specifically speaking to your point in making an evaluation about his character and integrity and i'm pointing to specific examples of what he was acting in it. >> it might have been illegal. it might be politically unwise are painful to go through but i think that the democrats leap to impeach after hearing anonymous sources is a little bit of a stretch. speaker they should have moved to impeach now but let's clarify something. it is not a political issue. when he said lay off my boy, that is obstruction of justice. speak out much more to come on spew one. to some advice on how to react to the recent news.

can't wait. that's straight ahead.

>> everyday we are told this is it for the trump administration. it's over, leave the keys to the

white house with pens. he makes it pretty easy for his critics. what he says out loud makes leaking so easy. but now all the coverage of him is a nonstop car alarm. as defenders fight every battle like it's the last. but maybe everyone should calm down. and i can't believe i'm going to say this, but listen to nancy. >> you're telling him impeachment, but what are the facts? not, i don't like him and i don't like his hair. what are the facts? i don't like what he said about this. but what are the facts that you would make a case on. what are the rules that he may have violated? if you don't have that case, you're just participating in more hearsay. >> yes. for more on this we go to hell.

>> just as i thought, hell has frozen over. nancy is right. and by admitting that i now have a rash all over my body. but when she is the voice of reason you know things are nuts. we need to separate the personality from the policies. you see his policies are largely benign. it's his behavior that's so brash. the hate toward them is so visceral that every misstep becomes the end. they finally grow tired of the coverage before they tire of trump? both are exhausting. so does he talk out of turthat'.

are his words exaggerated by those who can't accept an election result? that's plausible too. if he's nefarious or noble, it's never right. it's always going to be in the middle so instead, relax. everybody relax and take inspiration from the world's greatest movie. >> remain calm. [screaming] speaker remain calm. all is well. speak of that worked out well. kimberly, you're related to nancy pelosi by one of your many marriages. speaker that's so mean. that's fake news. >> isn't it refreshing that she's the voice of moderation? >> and aunt through marriage. speak what you don't need to be defensive, it's fine. it's a five marriages that's the problem. >> it's too.

but i actually agree with her. i thought she was lucid, she made sense. that's actually accurate. we can't run around with hearsay. what are the facts versus the media hysteria. they bought a not an end outcome without even wondering, caring, or delivering on any supporting facts and that's a problem. they're a long way from being able to accomplish or achieve that because they have fanciful dreams like children about impeachment and then obviously trying to take back the house. but you can't just do that without some kind of wrongdoing. >> bob i'm sure you'll agree with me on this but it seems like this story about russia is already dying on the vine. it's over. >> has your stomach, greg? that's us dying on the vine. speak out he says he's in better physical health than you. >> i think i might be in supper my legs. but anyway. i'm not over this. let me just say, you said something, did you say somethin

something? you little fly mac speak out we got it, did you get it? fish. it was fish and shrimp, wasn't it? >> there was no strength. >> make your point. >> i'm trying to, but i got interrupted as usual. you keep talking about facts. but i agree. i think you've set it up exactly right but there are some facts that we do know, that a highly classified intelligence operation was leaked. that's a fact. the reason we know that is the name of the town, it was controlled by isis. the american people knew that. it was a highly classified operation. that leak emanated from somebody in the white house. now, in that room, and the oval office that day, because the only people who would know about this intelligence

operation would be the president, mcmasters, and the secretaries of state and defense. one of them may have leaked it. the other three said they weren't talking. they were letting trump talk. and he sort of admitted it, too. wait a second, so that's a fact. and the fact was that an agent left there and called the cia, the nsa to warn them about, that's a fact. when you have those facts in front of you what do you say? donald trump leaks are classified operation. speak a kind of like obama's white house, remember that with the raid on usama bin laden? >> i was hoping you of all people would not go back there. speak up that's a very good point. i have a "washington post" headline here from last summer when obama was present. u.s. offers to share syria intelligence on terror. okay? how about bradley manning. chelsea manning, didn't he leak

all types of classified information and president obama gave him clemency? how about edward snowden? he was a hero for the left. the left is outraged when things are leaks. but perhaps president obama dominic trump said the wrong thing. and that's a mistake. but he's trying to keep us safe. he's trying to work with tricia dominic russia to save lives and if you're saying that trump shouldn't be trusted, you voted for a woman who the fbi said shouldn't be trusted with classified information. >> this is about a band that was already discussed. in the statement from dena powell and from mcmaster was that no direct sources, military operations, procedures, anything like that was released. but then "the washington post" put it forward in that paper. >> yes, he did not know the sources.

i think, and it's not about sources, and it's about the naivete of trump. the fact that he thinks that since russia and america doesn't like i said us we can talk about this and maybe he thought that way and then he said something but as far as i can tell they are saying what he said was -- go speak of the world of intel is about nuance and complexity and you do have to tread carefully. they said he didn't know. why didn't he know, that's a problem too. if i could comment on nancy pelosi i don't think that the demo credits don't want to impeach him because i think the longer he stays they think that's actually there to get back to relevance. speak out your right about that. >> of course i was. >> right now the guys down to 36%, he'll be killed in the midterm. >> coming up to the washington mode post just admit that it's biased against trump? that story is next.

speak of the washington that post erupted into applause last night after their story broke an online readership record what the report that president shared a highly classified intelligence with russia according to a twitter post. matt drudge, publisher of the highly influential drudge report took issue with the celebration saying it finally clarifies how this has turned into nothing but a blood sport. stop snoring, bob. dino, what is your assessment? >> it's a business. we look at our ratings every day. would love to break news. i don't know if we would break news that uses anonymous sources like this about an intelligent story, maybe we wouldn't, i don't know what we would do in that case. but they are in a highly

competitive situation. they're being called fake news all the time, and they cheered. i guess if we had a big night where we won, i mean it so passe for us. i'm so tired of winning. speak of what you think? >> we know why they broke the record for viewership, because hillary just kept pressing refresh over and over again because that's all she does in the woods with her laptop. it proves the point that, as much as the media pretends to find him so odious they are not so secretly overjoyed that they won because remember how it could be, you said "saturday night live" parities as a comparison, they refuse to be funny, they would use her character kind of in a gentle way where she was up irving from up high. that's what they would have to be doing now in comedy if she was president. they wouldn't be doing their

job. so thank trump for making your job grade again. >> if they don't have him they have pens. kimberly, a study came out and it said cnn dedicated 92% of their coverage to the presidency and 78% were anti-trump guests. >> is a very significant play here in terms of trying to do win the presidency of donald trump to the point where we really see that it's almost become a blood sport for them. this is what they crave, a certain outcome, and anything that can resonate with that and try to effectuate that outcome, they are going to run with. it's like a witch hunt. it doesn't matter if he does something positive, something good, job numbers or anything like that, they're going to find a way to turn it against them. that's the reality of it. they are very biased. speak a good friend of mine made a very good point.

he's being played as a victim now. like obama all the time. let's go back to watergate, okay? do you want to go through that? >> 's go back to the vietnam war. speak of they had this guy who was a big bully as a victim and he's not. by the way, were spending a hundred percent of the show on it. speak how to explain the bias of the coverage and the numbers? >> what's that? >> how do you explain the biased coverage on the numbers on the polling about it? >> you look at one number and that's every day. he is now below nixon. >> i'm not asking about that. i'm asking about the coverage. >> 's take a look at the electoral college. >> oh, god. speak out directly ahead, isis trying to down airlines with laptop bombs. a full report after this break.

>> details are emerging of the terror threat discussed with the russians last week. isis is apparently trying to down airliners with laptop bombs. speak with the president was meeting with the foreign minister about the terrorist threat. the president was emphasizing, we have some common interest here and we have to work together. we have an area of cooperation with the national terrorist organizations, isis in particular, an organization that had already taken down a russian airliner and murdered over 200 people in october of 2015. >> command performance, four stars? five stars? so dana, mcmasters, we love it it. >> obviously i think, when you have somebody that's a subject

matter expert that can come to the podium and calm people down, but i also think that this is sort of, this has bothered me, it's been 48 hours since the story is been out there. the root of the story is the fact that isis is actually working on technology that could cause significant damage to innocent life to our economy, the whole system. and i feel like america has to make a decision about investing in technologies that are entrepreneurs and innovators come up with and we cannot let isis out with us on technology. when it comes on getting to an airport, whatever it might be, there are some things, it's expensive and people get annoyed, but they can see through your clothing and may be the robots are actually the solution to this because they would be more efficient at it than a human being and then you have a human layer as well just checking to make sure because we cannot let isis out with us on technology, that is atrocious. speak out you can't just be playing a secondary backup game that you might get lucky and be

able to get some information, a rich source of intel especially in the past, we need to be able to stay ahead of it, be able to intercept us and then come up with the technology to be able to combat it. speak of that's getting lost in the fake scandal. i remember after an american was beheaded by a guy from isis, president obama went golfing and the media said he was cool and calm. trump is trying to deal with russia to keep everybody safe and he's now benedict arnold? it doesn't make a lot of sense. he's cleaning up the mess that obama left in the middle east. he let isis take over a third of iraq. there is a refugee crisis on his watch because he didn't draw a redline and everyone is up in arms because trump is trying to keep us safe and it seems like the media wants to defeat trump more than they want to defeat isis. >> let me just get through to

today. what happened here was they found out about these computer technologies because of a third country who is an ally of ours who had human intel in a very dangerous place. what trump did was to expose that and what is going to happen now is a lot of countries that normally share intel with us are going to be very, very literally of doing that. >> israel was reportedly the source and they said they will still share intel. >> of course they're going to say that. speak about bob you're trying to make a problem where israel has said we have no problem with that information being shared and impact the russians were already privy to that information. speak up they were not. they were not. speak oh, yes. it's been all over the news. everybody knows that isis is trying to use laptops. that's why they were going to ban them. speaker there is no intelligence there. speak out ridiculous. >> i'll go back to what dana was talking about.

infidels work day and night to kill us and the fact that we are still alive has to do with the distance number one in the look of our birth. but as technology marries to terror, those two variables won't matter anymore. distance will matter and where you were born won't matter because remember, we didn't fathom 9/11 until 9/11 and all that was was a box cutter plus a jet. not technology with a missile. it won't dawn on us until it happens and we go, while mac. speak of it's expensive but we have to decide if we're willing to pay for it. speak of the other thing about these laptops is it's going to create an whole new industry. laptops will be like rental cars. you land and you rent a laptop or baby you couldn't rent laptops. i'd rather be alive and deal with them on small little problem then be blown to a million pieces i can watch a video on my laptop. >> you drawn that far too much,

getting blown up. speak out we have no time for psychological problems. the president is going on his first overseas trip soon. we'll preview it after these messages.

speak out you find information, and he was leaking just like donald trump. donald trump is about to embark on his first overseas trip. it's very important thing for a president that he doesn't make any mistakes. i've got an idea here for all of us at the stable. who believes that donald trump is going to -- go laughter mac speak of this is a bad idea. speak out you know what he's not going to do? he's not going to bow to the saudi king. what do you think the chances are that he's going to get through this without making a gas? >> he's not going to do an apology to her. >> you are relentlessly off

message. speak of this is amazing. speak out give me some odds, please. just say it. >> i got to call my guys in the desert. what you think, three: one? whatever it's going to be it will be fake news. speak i think it's a great concept for a first trip, and it's bold. the three major capitals, there probably reasons for that. but i think it's a great concept. my motto is beware the foreign trip for president because something always happens on the homefront that you have to try to manage the time difference is hard. hundred% there will be something that happens on the trip that you think is a gas. and that jesse will think it's

no big deal that's probably somewhere in the middle. >> i believe, if i'm not mistaken, that he has traveled before. i think he has a plane and he has gone overseas and as a businessman worth billions he's actually met people who are different from him. having said that, you never know. you could ask the pope if the cracker comes in different flavors, which should be pretty funny. i give him 50%. it will be something innocuous. the speech in saudi arabia will be very, very important. at that he was very prepared. he has to keep his message, who he's meeting with, what kind of information and alliances and results come from it.

i think the timing is good. i think they need to get fit his fair due. speaker they should give it it's fair do. it's meticulously planned and i will give you 150% that this guy is going to blow it and blow it badly. he's going to call the pope the orthodox leader. speak i think is going to disappoint you. speak of this guy can't get through a day without making some verbal mistake. tes has pro-skin technology designed to quickly wick away moisture. to help maintain your skin's natural balance. it goes beyond triple protection from leaks, odor and moisture. so you can feel fresh and free to get as close as you want. only tena, lets you be you. ♪

listen up, heart disease.) you too, unnecessary er visits. and hey, unmanaged depression, don't get too comfortable. we're talking to you, cost inefficiencies and data without insights. and fragmented care- stop getting in the way of patient recovery and pay attention. every single one of you is on our list. for those who won't rest until the world is healthier, neither will we. optum. how well gets done. othe newly advanced gle can i'm csee in your blind spot. [ dinosaur roars ] onboard cameras and radar can detect danger all around you. driver assist systems can pull you back into your lane, if drifting. bye chief. bye bobby. and will even help you brake, if necessary. it makes driving less of a production. lease the gle 350 for $579 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing.

it's about moving forward, not back.t. it's looking up, not down. it's being in motion. in body, in spirit, in the now. boost® high protein it's intelligent nutrition with 15 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for when you need a little extra. boost® the number one high protein complete nutritional drink. be up for it

how if guests book direct ater, choicehotels.com and stay twice they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at choicehotels.com

speak a time for "one more thing." speak of this is a five cuteness alert. university of texas guy named josh stuck his pet chihuahua in a mini cap and gown in celebration of his recent graduation. look at some of these adorable photos. josh got his bachelor's degree in exercise science but attila must've got her bachelor's degree in, what, dana? >> canine cuteness. speak a very cute. >> is in that adorable? >> were going to stay in texas for this is carson healy. he received a diploma at texas christian university but his story was a bit different. he's 14 years old, youngest person accepting a diploma. he earned his college degree in physics after starting at the college in 2013 at just 11 years old. he was on "fox & friends," check it out. >> it was a very positive

experience. i really liked going and learning all the stuff that i could learn and just getting to grow. >> has mama has tested such a great job. his younger brother will also be attending tcu in the fall. he's 11. >> god bless them. >> i haven't banned a phrase in a while. let's ban one. the word you keep hearing over and over again, just like groundhog day. groundhog day is something that happens over and over again and people are tired of hearing about it. so i'm banning the phrase groundhog day. bob just use a certain finger in my direction and we didn't catch it. speak about was groundhog day too. bob? >> okay. let's go back to the president, if we could. trump gave a speech at liberty university and, you know, if you listen to what he says and listen to a certain movie that you all know, he seems to be

some amazing, amazing plagiarism here. let's take a look at it. because if you could tell what i mean. >> we take our next steps into the world. speak what you must go forth into the world. speak of it is the passion speak a passion >> courage of conviction. it >> courage of conviction. speak out most most importantly. >> have faith in yourself. >> have faith in yourself. >> i did it. >> i did it. >> unbelievable. they are hard at work in the capital. they are very worried about ducklings so they have installed a dock ramp so they don't have to exert themselves to go into the pool, they can then climb the ramp into the pool and it probably cost $45,000. speak about it's so cute. that's all.

>> billed to the wall! >> set your dvr, never miss an episode. "hannity" is next. >> many thanks to our friends on spew one. this is a fox news alert. we have lots of people here tonight to react to breaking news. we are following for huge breaking news stories. james call me is starting to enact his own revenge on trump for firing him. we'll have more later tonight, but first it's tonight for tonight's very important opening monologue. >> we start tonight with the trump heating "washington post." last night they release a story saying that trump gave the russian warrant minister and ambassador