see the world and it's terrifying. that is all for tonight. good night from washington. "the five" is next. they will have updates on the fire in london. see you >> kimberly: we could go in any time slot. >> thank you to our friends on the "the five." this is a fox news alert. jeff sessions obliterates the left, and her black helicopter. and slams the democrats for spreading detestable lies during his very, very powerful senate testimony today. also, newt gingrich, geraldo rivera, all here tonight with reaction. plus we are awaiting the return to the united states of an american student who was jailed in north korea for more than a year. he is indeed in need of serious

medical treatment and is currently in a coma. we are following that story closely. but first, jeff sessions testimony today, a huge win for president trump and his administration as they continue to fight back against the unprecedented attacks against them. that is tonight's very important opening monologue. the attorney general jeff sessions came out of the box today swinging and ready to shoot down the massive lie that is been pushed endlessly by the democrats and of course the destroyed trumpet media about so-called trump russia collusion despite no evidence at this point. it is evident now that it is a complete and total lie and fabrication. so when attorney general jeff sessions was pushed about it by the democrats, he punched back hard in a major way. >> i was your colleague in this body for 20 years, and i participated, and a suggestion that i participated in any

collusion, that i was aware of any collusion with the russian government to her to this country, which i have served with honor form 35 years, or to undermine the integrity of our democratic process is an appalling and detestable life. >> sean: good for the attorney general, and he wasn't finished. despite no evidence of so-called russia collusion, the democrats still continue to push this baseless black helicopter conspiracy theory. look at this testy exchange between the attorney general and liberal senator ron wyden. >> mr. comey said that there were matters about the recusal and they were problematic and he could not talk about them. what are they? >> why don't you tell me? there are none, senator wyden. there are none. i can tell you that for absolute

certainty. this is a secret innuendo being leaked out there about me, and i don't appreciate it, and i tried to give my best and truthful answers to any committee i've appeared before. it's really -- people are suggesting through innuendo that i have been not honest about matters, and i've tried to be honest. >> sean: all right, checkmate. what's so disgusting about all of this is that democrats including some who are actually on this senate intelligence committee and were actually questioning jeff sessions today, have admitted themselves, no evidence of collusion. since some of these democrats are so partisan that they have forgotten, let us remind them of their own words. >> do you agree with this conclusion that the president's has reached, that there is no evidence of collusion? >> we haven't seen any of that whatsoever, george. we've been looking and showing

everything that they possibly have. that has not led to that. >> the last time we spoke, senator, i asked you if you'd actually seen evidence of collusion between the trump campaign and the russians and you said to me, "not at this time." has anything changed since we spoke last? >> no it hasn't. >> just to be clear, there has not been any actual evidence, yet. >> know it has not been. >> sean: wow. so despite the fact that democrats have been forced, based on the facts as we know them, based on the evidence, to say no russia collusion. no evidence at this time. many on the left, and in the destroy trump media, are still running insanely wild with the completely false conspiracy theory. that just proves we have been telling you all along. this is not about getting to the truth, finding answers, finding out what the facts are.

the democrats, members of the liberal mainstream media, they don't care about any of that. why? because their goal is to destroy and discredit president trump now by any means necessary. in this case, it means embarrassing themselves by pushing debunked conspiracy theories. the left in this country has become so unhinged about the trump russia collusion conspiracy that doesn't exist that in today's hearing, senator tom cotton decided to call it up for what it really is. a fantasy, and something you would only read about and a tom clancy spy novel. take a look at this. >> mr. sessions, are you familiar with what spies call tradecraft? >> a little bit. >> things like dead drops, and brush passes, right? >> that is part of it. >> do you like spy fiction? daniel silva, jason matthews? >> yeah, david ignatius.

>> do you like jason bourne or james bond movies? have you ever in any of these fantastical situations heard of a plot line so ridiculous that a sitting united states senator and an ambassador of a foreign government colluded in an open setting with hundreds of other people to pull off the greatest caper in the history of investigation. >> sean: i happen to love those movies. but they actually nailed it there. there is a lot of credit for calling out these democrats and of course the destroy trump media's lies about what is really going on here. this has now become nothing more than a witch hunt. plain and simple. it's another massive part of the story that involves actual scandals, actual crimes that have been committed, that they are ignoring. something that the destroy trump media that refuses to tell you about. we will tell you here on the show. let's start with the leader of this political witch hunt, right now that would be special

counsel robert mueller, who should be closing up shop. one, he has stunning conflicts of interest, like the fact that he has known james comey for years. they are good friends. in fact, comey testified that the reason he had a friend leaked the memo, which we believe is illegal to "the new york times," is to bring about the appointment of a special counsel good and big surprise, it ended up being robert mueller, and fox news previously reported, comey's testimony last week was called "closely coordinated with the special counsel." think about this for a minute. you have a disgruntled former fired employee in james call me, clearly spiteful and now one of his closest personal friends is now leading the investigation into president trump, who comey is accusing him of wrongdoing. there is no way that this investigation can be fair or objective. it is now impossible. so, who do you think mueller is going to side with? his friend or the president?

a friend, by the way, that he's going after. this is a massive conflict of interest, and it cannot be ignored. that is why our colleague and friend gregg jarrett is calling it all out. according to greg, comey and mueller's relationship may violate two federal laws. here's the first one. disqualification arising from personal or political relationship. that is what we are describing with comey and mueller's relationship. the next law, conduct and accountability. they said that the attorney general fire a special counsel if he or she has a conflict of interest. that's not all. it gets even worse and more outrageous. several outlets have reported the key people on mueller's investigation team have actually donated to the democrats. that is why we are calling for

this special counsel to be shut down. by the way, that brings us to the real scandal that has been it completely ignored by the media, by the democrats, and the fact is this. the former attorney general, loretta lynch, tried to obstruct justice by interfering the fbi's claim to an email server investigation. here is how james comey described it last week in front of this very same committee. take a look. >> the clinton campaign at the time was using all kinds of euphemisms, security review, it matters, things like that for what was going on. we were going to a place where the attorney general and i were going to have to testify and talk publicly about it, and i wanted to know what she going to authorize us to confirm we had an investigation. she said yes, but don't call it that, call it a matter. i said, why would i do that? >> come she said, just call it a matter. >> sean: added that to the tarmac meeting between bill clinton and loretta ranch,

this is the real scandal tonight and it's only getting bigger. she has been blowing the scandal wide open along with her colleague, not take a look at this headline. comey got steely silence after confronting loretta lynch about clinton emails. now, if robert mueller wants to investigate real obstruction of justice, then he should be looking into loretta lynch and what she did. and if the democrats want to talk about collusion, since they are conspiracy theories about president trump have been completely debunked, then let's talk about hillary clinton colluding with vladimir putin, the r rating on one deal. she signed off as secretary of state, handing over 20% of america's uranium to putin. while people, all involved in this deal, they were donating big bucks to the clinton foundation, and her husband was doubling his speaking fees in

moscow. meanwhile the media has completely gotten this wrong and they are backwards. they had hit a new low, they are the worst. as we have explained right here on this program, there are five forces working to take down president trump. this is a real clear present danger to the president you elected in november. those selectively leaking information to damage the president. by the way, kind of like james call me dead. second, the destroy trump media. a bunch of tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists, caught red handed, colluding with the clinton campaign as wikileaks revealed. of course you also have the unhinged democrats, a bunch of sore losers, obstruction is at this point, bitter about the election at this point. they never got over the fact that donald trump one. weak spineless republicans, no backbone, never supported trump to begin with. and then you have the whole never trump crowd. they want medication. they want to see the president

fail so they can say, we told you so. this has now become a serious moment of truth for the united states of america. we are either going to lose to these forces and allow them to distract this president from getting people off of poverty, out of food stamps, and back in the labor force, buying homes. the president and the agenda you elected him to an act, or can stop it right now, what they are trying to do to this man. they don't want his success. his success is their failure. to do this, james comey, and loretta lynch need to be investigated, robert mueller needs to go, and with all due respect, it's time for hillary clinton to be prosecuted. joining us now, the author of "understanding trump" former speaker newt gingrich. good to see you. >> good to see you. >> sean: dear agree with what i just said? >> i think we are in a clear-cut

cultural civil war. i think there are number of republicans that don't get it. i would start with the very beginning of your monologue, and i wish every republican would look at the lesson that the attorney general jeff sessions gave them today. he was passionate, he used strong language, he didn't back down, he had the facts, and he is prepared to go nose to nose with liberals. i think he clearly won because he was willing to be the more judgmental and more emotional and more committed than worth the democrats. if every republican learned that, and let me take the example of attorney general lynch. it has been a week since the head, the democratic ranking member of the intelligence committee, senator feinstein

said she thought that congress ought to look into whether or not attorney general lynch was in fact obstructing justice. i can't understand the republican party, which is offered on a platter by the ranking democrat of the intelligence committee, a very senior respected member of the senate, an opportunity to open up and investigate the democrat attorney general. and i have heard nothing. this is typical. we allow the left to set the agenda, we allow the left to define the terms of the debate. we are passive, and i think that it's really a huge mistake to not take these people head-on. >> sean: let me stay on loretta lynch while you're there. by the way, i would agree. sessions eviscerated these hearings today. it should be an abject lesson for republicans. that is how you fight, that is how you stand up for truth. there are so many weak republicans, it is frankly

embarrassing and pathetic on both the agenda, getting work done in congress, and secondly standing up for the things they promised the american people. but, you have the tarmac meeting with bill clinton in a plain, totally inappropriate. possible collusion, possible obstruction. then, it gets worse than that. he takes james comey to take a word in an investigation and turn it into a matter. a later, james comey confronts her that she had put the kibosh on any possible indictment of where the evidence led, and gave him a steely, silent look, and said anything else? that, to me, if she doesn't get brought before a committee and investigated, we don't have justice in this country. >> let's go back to your very first point. how can you h house and a republican senate, and not bring in the attorney general and the former president under oath and get

each of them to describe what they were discussing? i think this is, and terms of why people are sick of washington, the idea that they happen to be at the same airpor airport. this is four or five days before they are going to interview secretary clinton, which they did not under oath. you go through this whole thing, and it's no wonder the average american is disgusted. as you know, i was just out in new jersey tonight with my new book, "understanding trump" and i had hundreds of people there. the number of them who get everything you just said tonight, and can't understand why republicans are not standing up and fighting. what is startling to me, how intense it is and how rapidly it is spreading. there are actually four people he has hired, who donated to the democrats. one of them worked for the clinton foundation.

>> sean: you know what she did for the clinton foundation? she was fighting freedom of information act request as it relates to the clinton foundation. >> another one of them cheated and refused to give the defense information it should have in two major cases. that lawyer helped destroy 85,000 jobs, and later, when it was too late, the supreme court voted 9-0 that what he had done is wrong. my point earlier today was, if mueller wanted to prove he is reasonable, let's cut a deal. you have to hire one pro trump lawyer for every antitrust lawyer. let's see whether or not he's willing to do that. i had a news person today say to me, are you suggesting -- maybe he just hired the four best people in the country. let me get this straight, you

believe there is no republican lawyer capable of being on that team? this is the mindset of the elite media that shows you how sick the system is. >> sean: there are three things here, one. it comey's best friend. number two, hires clinton's lawyer for the clinton foundation who is fighting freedom of information request. there also obama and clinton donors. "understanding trump," we will ask him about that, we will also ask him why the special counsel should get out of the way tomorrow. what republican should do pretty will join us after the break. also coming up next -- coat >> we have got to restore a regular order principle. we cannot have persons in our intelligence agencies, our investigative indices, or in congress leaking sensitive matters.

>> the attorney general jeff sessions tears it up today explain how damaging the leaks are for our national security. newt gingrich has reaction on that and later tonight, they weigh in on his testimony and sarah carter's big breaking news about james comey and loretta lynch, and possibly loretta lynch putting the kibosh on hillary clinton. also tonight, we told you about the disturbing play going on in new york city, depicting the assassination of president trump. but guess what, you won't believe the taxpayer dollars were actually given to the so-called shakespeare in the park festival. the and more.

♪ surfing is a sport that takes a lot out of you physically. from the moment i wake up on my tempur-pedic mattress i feel like i'm ready to take on the day. i don't have aches and pains from the previous day's training.

and i feel like myself. i wake up feeling stronger, a better surfer a better me. ♪ find your exclusive retailer at tempur-pedic.com

live-streat the airport.e sport, binge dvr'd shows, while painting your toes.

on demand laughs, during long bubble baths. tv on every screen is awesome. the all-new xfinity stream app. all your tv at home. the most on demand, your entire dvr, top networks, and live sports on the go. included with xfinity tv. xfinity the future of awesome. >> are these leaks serious threats to our national security and is the department of justice taking them with the appropriate degree of seriousness and investigating and will prosecute them with the fullest extent of the law? >> thank you. we have had one successful case in georgia. that person has been denied bail and has been held in custody. but, some of these leaks, as you well know, are extraordinarily damaging to the united states security.

we have got to restore a regular order principle. we cannot have persons and our intelligence agencies, our investigative agencies, or in congress, leaking sensitive matters. >> sean: that was the attorney general jeff sessions earlier today stressing just how dangerous, how damaging the leaks are. the selective leaks out of washington, for the security of this country. we continue now with former speaker of the house new gingrich. his new book out, "understanding trump." i think about what you just heard there, and the attorney just mentioned selective leaks to damage the president. if the deep state, those that have been leaking, aren't dealt with and prosecuted now and the attorney general mentioned just one prosecution, but there are others at a much higher level,

to me they've got a minnow, and they really need to get the great whites. i don't think this ever ends for the president, i'm glad i can make you laugh. if we don't get these top people, it's dangerous. >> let me be clear. this is not about the president or getting the president. i agree with general kelly, the secretary of homeland security who said, many of these verged on treason. this is about the survival and the safety of the united states of america and the people of the united states. i don't care if you are pro trump or anti-trump, there is no excuse for people taking on themselves the right to take secrets and release them. candidly, there is no excuse for the news media picking them up and printing them. we've gotten into this entire cycle of unpatriotic behavior in which people are utterly irresponsible. i think they should be prosecuted, i think it should be

aggressive and vigorous, and i frankly think everybody in the white house should have to go through a session on what the secrecy laws are. i think all new political appointees should have to go through that session, and what the consequences will be if you violate them. >> sean: we know crimes were committed. one was against general flynn in the espionage act. we know with these leaks, they are all illegal acts. i look at robert mueller and i see similarities to patrick fitzgerald. here, mueller, knows there is no obstruction. he knows the president was not involved in collusion. here he knows that he wasn't being investigated, and he is hiring all of these obama, clinton supporters, donors, and even clinton's attorney to go

after the president. this is bad. >> and remember who appointed james clapper. it was james comey. he appoints fitzpatrick anyway, and he goes after dick cheney's chief of staff, because what he wants to do is coerce libby in turning on the president. libby is an honorable man and refuses to do so. that is what i worry about. the team that mueller is assembling. i don't think they're going to get trump, but i think they are going to get other people, because when you are involved in this kind of criminal investigation, people who have the power of the government can set you up for all sorts of secondary charges and can ruin your life and can bankrupt you, and i think this is a bad deal. >> sean: this is a bad deal, i

think there is great danger here, there is also investigative creep here. he ends up with somebody falling into a perjury trap because they don't remember, they made a mistake. nobody gets to revise or extend their remarks. the question is, what the republicans do now, knowing there is no obstruction, knowing there's no collusion. should they shut this down? >> i think the two intelligence committees have an easy task. you bring in mueller, and you say to him, how often do you talk with comey. how often did you swap information with comey. did you review comey testimony before he gave it. how many of comey's various memos did you get out of regular order? i think you start with this whole question. i was initially in favor of mueller, given his past record. i tweeted favorable things, but the minute comey explained with

enormous arrogance that he had deliberately leaked a memo for the purpose of forcing a special counsel who just happens to be his close friend, from that minutes on, the fix is in and this is really sick. >> sean: i want to go back to one of the questions i asked you earlier tonight. the five different groups that i argue are after trump, starting with the deep state. i want to tie it with something. you have this new book out toda today, and you probably have the keenest insight, because nobody thought trump would beat 16 other people in a primary. the media never thought that donald trump would be present. they are still any state of shock, but there's also a state of anger and revenge that has emerged. now it is about them, as you described, then waking up every day. how can we destroy him now. in the process, the american people are being heard. the millions and poverty and on

food stamps, and out of the labor force. >> the tax paid play in new york city that shows the assassination of the president and the first lady, when you look at the so-called comedian holding the head of the president bleeding, the closest to that analogy that i can come to is arthur miller's a great play "the crucible" which is about the witchcraft trials in salem. the play about mass hysteria. it's a play about people who have suddenly decided that their neighbors were witches and had to be burnt at the stake. you're seeing an entire of psychological dislocation on the left, leading to behaviors that no reasonable person. i even find out reporters, when they see things like this play where the president and the first lady are assassinated, just a sickness. when you look at kathy griffin

and her holding up the president's head, that there is a sickness that is beginning to sink into people and they begin to realize how bad it is. i think you're even going to see moderate liberals began to split away and say, that's crazy, and you've got to quit doing it. that's the mood -- >> sean: i would like to agree with you, but i respectfully disagree. there is no evidence. it gets worse and worse. imagine for almost 11 months now the media just lying to the american people. with no evidence. the people on that very committee today saying, no evidence of collusion, and sanctimoniously, creating smoke where there is none. it's called "understanding trump" bookstores everywhere. amazon.com. mr. speaker, thank you for being with us. coming out, we have a lot more on the attorney general and his fiery senate showdown from earlier today. our panel is here to weigh in.

also, sarah's explosive new report involving james comey and loretta lynch lynch. it did loretta lynch put the fix and for hillary clinton? plus, it's the play that the speaker was just talking about, that will make you cringe. assignment new yorkers

>> sean: this is a fox news alert. we have brand-new video. cincinnati, ohio, where the american student who is now in a coma and in need of very serious medical attention. he just arrived in the u.s. after being jailed in north korea for more than a year. if you remember, he was arrested last year, jailed for allegedly stealing a political sign. 15 years he was sentenced to hard labor. we will bring an update to you and find out more. also tonight, the attorney general jeff sessions, he held nothing back today. he hit back hard testifying on capitol hill. in an op-ed for foxnews.com,

our very own gregg jarrett asked this question tonight. where does jeff sessions go to get his good name back? how about the president? greg will join us in just a minute. also tonight, and explosive new report. it reads "comey got steely silence." sarah, let me start with you. we have got to get two sessions, but this report is not being ignored. we have the tarmac meeting with bill clinton, we have loretta lynch saying to comey, it's not an investigation it's a matter. he capitulated to that. now, you're saying comey confronted a loretta lynch on the issue of her having already decided to put the kibosh and

cover for hillary clinton no matter what the evidence showed? >> i think what comey was trying to do was get her reaction to the evidence that he had in his hand. what we know is, he's been briefing lawmakers on this. he has the communication. it is a private communication between two political figures that is considered classified. because of the way the fbi obtained that communication and evidence. what happened is, he had gone to loretta lynch, he went to the department of justice, he talked to her about meeting bill clinton on the tarmac in 2016, and then he showed her this piece of evidence that he said, according to the lawmakers that were briefed by him, he said could you please look at this. when she actually looked at it, she looks back up at him with steely silence, which he said lasted for a long time, and asked him if he had any more questions, and if not he should leave. that was it. that is what we don't know. what is it that he has in his

hands? what was it that he's looking at? what is it that he's been briefing lawmakers in those classified sessions that made him so concerned that he approached her? but then again in the end, he didn't move forward to the department of justice. he didn't pursue the case against hillary clinton, so this is a contradiction here. this is the irony here. >> sean: this is so amazing to me. dave, let's go to the legal side of this. >> that would certainly demand an investigation into possible obstruction of justice, if we go back to the email investigation alone. remember, the legal standard is gross negligence. he said she was extremely careless. we already know she mishandled classified information and top-secret information and special access program information and a mom and shop bathroom closet. of course, she destroyed such information. two of those issues are felonies, are they not?

>> they are, and of course extreme carelessness is what gross negligence means. the idea, i think that dianne feinstein was correct, when she said the whole exchange about the decision to call this a matter, and by the way when the fbi does something it's an investigation, but calling it a matter she said it needs to be investigated. i think there is a deeper issue here. that is, why is it that those kinds of issues did not get any discussion? why is it that james comey went to the tv cameras about 11 months ago and said he made the determination there was not a prosecutable case against hillary clinton, which by the way, is not his decision. yet, after assuring the president three times as he acknowledges is in his written testimony, that the president has not been the subject of an investigation, he would not get

that information out. that he would knock it out, by the way i was very critical of what james 12 did against hillary clinton, going on and off again. >> sean: let me get greg in the segment. you have been focused and on the law that says if james comey thought it was obstruction, he had a legal obligation to save immediately. this was government material he leaked to "the new york times." where is his investigation into him, and if he did it to get a special counsel that ends up being his best friend? >> and where has james comey be ben? under the law, there can be no obstruction of justice because there is no lie, threat, or bribe. but, which is required under the law, but, what about loretta

lynch? if she tried to squash this investigation and prosecution of hillary clinton, is there an accompanying live? well, yes there would be if she is trying to get james comey to live. >> sean: is this topsy-turvy? they are investigating the wrong side, but there really a scanda scandal? >> they may now be investor getting loretta lynch. >> sean: what, loretta lynch, james comey? well get back into this. also tonight, a performance of "julius caesar" is now causing an outrage in shakespeare in the park. it shows the brutal assassination of a donald trump look alike. we are glad you're with us.

>> sean: a fox news alert, a massive fire in london tonight. firefighters are struggling to control the blaze in a high-rise residential building. we're going to keep an eye on the story on the fox news channel. jake, let me go back to you. all of the issues that we now know, the president was never under investigation. there is no collusion whatsoever as it relates to russia. and then it the question, why are we even in this situation,

where there is no collusion? >> we are in the situation because, unfortunately, and i think this is a real travesty, we are acting like this started when robert mueller was appointed a special counselor. this is been going on for ten months. all of these witnesses have come forward, including democratic senators, intelligence officials, who say we see no evidence of collusion. james mueller said that. no collusion that he could tell. then he leaked the memo. i go back to that memo leak. here's what you got to think about this. he has a private conversation with the president of united states. his capacity is the director of the fbi. he then goes to his car, which

is an fbi vehicle, goes to his fbi computer, and types out a memorandum which he puts on his fbi desk. he then gets terminated and he leaks it to a friend to leak it to "the new york times" for the sole purpose of getting a special investigator which he got. >> sean: let me remind our audience what they are looking at. this is a high-rise fire in london. our thoughts and prayers go out to our friends and those people who might be at risk tonight and the firefighters who have to deal with all of that tonight. sarah, the neglect to you. it seems like it comes down to comey, mueller, lynch, and yes, hillary clinton. hillary clinton, not just gross negligence. crimes were committed. again, if loretta lynch put the kibosh on it, that puts her in legal jeopardy or does it not?

>> this is going to lead us to another series. if congress does not call her to testify, then something is wrong. she needs to answer these questions. you know, jay also brought up this point earlier, but the evidence is all on the other side. what we have been looking at is leaks. very coordinated leaks of unmasking, lieutenant general michael flynn as the national security advisor to the president. >> sean: what was the percentage increase in the election season? >> sean: as reported by john and i, it was over 300%. that is something to be concerned about. all of these unmasking's. remember how narrow this was. very few people knew michael flynn's name. i keep going there. people within the fbi and maybe some within the doj, somebody in there read those transcripts, cut text, and leaked it. that is a fact. >> sean: if you were to tell

the president tonight how important it is for him to get rid of the obama holdovers, the deep state that are selectively leaking to hurt him. >> i think if you're asking me that question, that is a question that needs to be left up to the present. he needs to take a very hard look at what's happening in washington. and who is who, and who is on first. there a lot of people within the fbi, within the doj, within the intelligence community's, that probably don't want to see him there. he has to wonder where all these leaks are coming from. what we know is a lot of them are illegal. >> sean: i think it is imperative. by the way, we will put it up on the side, this is one of the most devastating fires i have ever seen. this is beyond scary. what we are seeing coming out of there. gregg jarrett, you brought up the line from back in the reagan investigation, would like to get my good name back? where does the president go

considering there is no collusion, as we all have discussed. not only did he not obstruct, he says, i want you to continue the investigation. the question is, as it relates to lynch, comey, mueller, and clinton. legally, where should we go? >> there ought to be an independent counsel appointed to investigate the hillary clinton case. given what we just learned a few days ago from james comey, that loretta lynch was trying to influence him by perpetuating alignment that it was a matter and not an investigation. donald trump promised that if you elect me president, i will have a special counsel appointed to investigate the hillary clinton case. now there is renewed reason for that. because comey mangled the law when he said, she didn't intend to violate the law. that is not the legal standard. he got it all wrong.

>> sean: all right guys, we should just spend the whole hour on this with the three of you. we could go all night. we could go all night. again, we[hissing] uh- i- [sound of wrench] [intricate guitar riff] [engine starts] [guitar continues] with tempur-pedic.t our proprietary material automatically adjusts to your weight, shape and temperature. so you sleep deeply, and wake up feeling powerful. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com

>> sean: fox news, we are following breaking news tonight. a massive fire in a high-rise out of london. firefighters struggling to contain that blaze that has now engulfed this major residential building. also tonight, a new disgusting attack against resident trump. a brand-new production, shakespeare in the park, new york city. this year's play features a president trump look alike brutally stabbed in a modern interpretation of the play "julius caesar." in case you're wondering, who's paying for this, you might want to check your own wallet. according to forbes, "julius caesar's parent company received $30 million from taxpayers. geraldo rivera joining us. i can't comment now, i'm looking at one of the wildest fires i have ever seen. that looks devastating.

>> at least 40 firetrucks are on the scene there, sean. it's called the -- that whole building, as you can clearly see, and spreading through the block. there are hundreds of people outside. the police are trying to move the crowds away. to let the ambulances drive through. no word on what started this place. obviously, it's not under control yet. we have no -- >> sean: is it scary. look at every single level. everything level is now on fire. i pray nobody is in that building right now. >> one of the report says there were people with flashlights up top early on. we believe they were evacuated. their helicopters overhead. obviously, the information is preliminary. the audience at home can see

this is an unprecedented blaze. the temperature generated by that thing. >> sean: it's every single floor. any indication of criminal activity, we are watching. now the play does get money generally from the national endowment for the arts, in other words all of us. it's interesting to note that the national endowment for the arts is also an battle with the trump administration. they are fighting to keep their endowment. this controversy over "julius caesar" will not help them make the case. we know that bank of america and delta have already pulled out. but two of the remaining sponsors are stubbornly digging in their heels and backing this distasteful presentation. "the new york times" company, interesting enough, and time warner, both journalistic

institutions, and bitter enemies of donald trump. >> sean: yeah, fake news networks. geraldo, i'm thing about this as i watch this fire tonight. and if you just imagine for a second if this was barack obama and an isa style beheading picture that the 11-year-old son of the president has to see. the attacks on the first lady have been disgusting and despicable, the first daughter, disgusting and despicable, all across the board, unprecedented. if you replace the words president trump with president obama, you and i both know the reaction in this country would be dramatically different. >> i think the barack obama test is an excellent test for artists and comics. how would you react if it were up barack obama's head. how would you react if it was barack obama getting stabbed and michelle on the stage, and a pouty woman that they describe

the actress in julius caesar. >> sean: all right, i've got to roll. listen, you've been great. thank you so much. that's all the time we have for