populism, how did it start, where is it taking us. i will be filling in for sean tomorrow night. we will have a lot of fun. make sure to tune in men. we will see you night. >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." massive protests in hamburg, germany, where thousands graveled to protest. a g20 summit attended by the president. police used fire hoses to maintain order. 15 police officers were hurt in the ensuing chaos. earlier in the day, the

president received a far warmer reception in warsaw, poland where he spoke to a crowd that would not have been out of place at a rally in oklahoma or ohio. speeches like this are always an occasion for a president to say nice things about the country he is visiting, and president trump did that. but then he went on to do something unusual. he offered a spirited defense of western civilization from those who seek its destruction. who exactly would destroy it? radical islam, of course, isis, brain-dead ease and crazy people with bombs. they are a danger to us, the president explained. maybe the gravest threat we face comes from within. the president put it this way. >> we must work together to confront forces, whether they come from inside or out, from the south or the east, that threaten overtime to undermine these values into a race the

bonds of culture, faith, and tradition. that make us who we are. [cheers and applause] if left unchecked, these forces will undermine our courage, sap our spirit, and weaken our will to defend ourselves and our societies. >> tucker: undermine our courage. sap our spirit to make spirit. isis isn't doing that. our elites are. they tell us hate ourselves and our culture and our history when they teach our children to despise the country that produced them. when they claimed that percentage point of annual economic growth is more important than the bonds that connect us to each other. america isn't falling to foreign invaders, it is writing from within because the people in charge don't think it's worth preserving. you have to love a civilization in order to save it, and they don't. in 141 of the christmas chemist truest words he is ever spoken, the prisoner might of the world

why the west is worth defending. >> we are the fastest and the greatest community. there is nothing like our community of nations. the world has never known anything like our community of nations. we write symphonies. we pursue innovation. we celebrate our ancient heroes, and price are timeless traditions, and customs. and always seek to explore and discover brand-new frontiers. we reward brilliance. we strive for excellence. we cherish inspiring works of art that honor guard. we treasure the rule of law and protect the right to free speech. and free expression. we empower women as pillars of

our society and of our success. we put faith in family, not government and bureaucracy at the center of our lives, and we debate everything. we challenge everything. we seek to know everything so that we can better know ourselves. and above all, we value the dignity of every human life, protect the rights of every person, and share the hope of every song delivering freedom. >> tucker: we don't hear much, but all that is true. we are different from other societies. we speak freely, we protect the individual. we do write symphonies. we have no reason to be ashamed. we've got a lot of reasons to be proud. not just of wealth, not just the sum of our gdp, but a constellation. values, norms, traditions, heroes, villains, and even religious beliefs are the most successful and benevolent in human history. it still vulnerable.

all civilizations of grenoble. rome looked invincible at one point, too. it turned out not to be. it's worth remembering the basics. western civilization is a birthright. it makes all good things possible. undefended, he collapses. we got to fight to preserve it. not just with air strikes, but with a vigorous defense of our common values. nothing matters more than that. president trump has his flaws, but to his everlasting credit he is willing to say all of that out loud. that's worth something. charles krauthammer is a writer and columnist. one of the finer fruits of western civilization. he joins us tonight. charles, what did you make of the speech ? >> i'm working on a symphony, so i will let you know. look, -- [laughs] >> be my unfinished symphony, that's for sure. this is this best speech he's given. it was very reagan-ask it was not so much about

american exceptionalism, he kept saying we and you, the poles, and the europeans, the west. this was a defense of the west. that's what made it so unusual for trump. this is the antithesis of his inaugural address, because it was about america. he didn't speak about the free world. he spoke about our allies as parasites in that speech. this was a complete overturning of that. this is a return to traditional american universalism, leading the community of nations meaning nato, the west, europe, including a lot of east asia, other places as well. and by taking on the mantle of leadership, basically expanding the meaning of americanism to go beyond our shores. it was a huge step, and extremely significant. >> tucker: what was so interesting about it for my perspective was not his attack on islamic extremism, which i think is warranted and good for

them for saying so out, but identifying the rods within american culture and saying we don't believe in our own values. alt then all is lost. there something about that that is going to offend an awful lot of people, i suspect. >> if they read the speech or if they hear it, i'm not sure they will. but i think that is the key. i would not attribute his lack of faith in our society to our elite. i think it resides more with the left. now the left, having had a 50 year program of what they call the march through the institutions, had a plan to take over the institutions, the leading ones. the universities. the purveyors of hollywood media, the places where you go to learn. even museums for god sake. they have succeeded. i wouldn't call that the elites. yes, they control a lot of the position of power, but that is the left and i don't think it applies to conservative elites.

i think that was the message of this speech, upholding those. the flip side, that was the most anti-russian speech since ronald reagan. he may have had a few lines on islamic radicalism, but he was unrelenting in attacking the russians, which in many ways undoes the vision, the meme which i think is simply false of him as an instrument, a manchurian candidate of the russians. he not only attack them for their actions in world war ii, he was savage and how they treated the poles during the 40 years of cold war, then he went ahead and basically said we are here to rescue you from your dependence on russian gas. because we are going to use it as a weapon. were not going to hold you hostage. these people are your enemies. that was, again, something new and very refreshing.

>> tucker: i think when history of all this is written, the idea that he's in bed with putin, while there are valid criticism, there will be the most ludicrous of all. thanks a lot. >> my pleasure. >> tucker: president trump held the second meeting with the german chancellor today. meanwhile, the migrant crisis continues unabated, accelerated. crossing the miniature nancy, and recently austria demilitarized in order to prevent mass migrant arrivals. but with him or his thought a lot about this. he he is that best-selling author of his book the strange book. it's hobbies, has her position on migrants softened at all? it seems to have totally overturned -- has she rethought it? >> has overturned.

she imported an extra 2% of the population in one year in 2015. last year, which did badly in regional elections, she suddenly said what was reported as an apology, it actually wasn't hurt she just said i wish we'd been better prepared for what happened. the consequences of what she did in 2015, opening the external borders of europe to the world, anybody that walked in could get into europe, it still being felt all the time. he just mentioned. 12,000 people came in to the italian islands alone just last weekend. it had consequences across the continent. as you mention, the austrian sending troops to the italian borders to reinforce it. just this past week, the danish intelligence services said the major threat to their country comes from the thousands of religious extremists in sweden. those aren't crazy calvinists who are kicking off in sweden, they are the people who come recently into sweden at angela

merkel's invitation. >> tucker: there was a "new york times" piece about his speech in warsaw, because it is basically one editorial now, that paper, the ticket to dig at the polish government for not allowing the migrant flow that germany and belgium have. central and eastern europe seem to be holding a line against this. if you think they will continue? >> yes, they have. it's one of the most interesting things. western europe and eastern europe think totally differently about this. a right-wing prime minister, hungry, and left wing and slovakia are absolutely as one on the fact that they don't want to take in millions of refugees and migrants. they don't think it's the job of their country to be a home for anyone in the world who wants to walk in and call their country home. i don't think that's going to change. by the way, that sneering of "the new york times" and other

papers, they should really reflect on the fact that even some of their cherished figures are starting to realize this, a very interesting development, bill gates gave an interview to one of the german papers. bill gates in 2015 said that america should take and migrants at the same rate that germany has. but just this week in a change of tone, bill gates said in an interview with the german newspaper that actually europe cannot, obviously cannot survive with the rates of migration that it's got at the moment. he said you got to find a way to stop the boat from landing. if everyone is starting to realize this, why don't we start to think now about the ways to solve this. as i say in my book, there are a whole load of things we should have been doing from the beginning. it was inevitable that people would realize this is a catastrophe. we have been woefully slow in waking up to it. i think that the lesson that america in to learn from this is incredibly striking. >> tucker: yes. and routinely and assertively

ignored. buyer policymakers. which is why it's honest have you on. thank you. speak a great pleasure to be with you. >> tucker: president trump continues to bash the press overseas. the press not happy about it. next we explore what is going on inside cnn. the organizers of the women's march is

>> tucker: president trump didn't just defend western civilization during his visit to poland today. during a joint news conference with the polish president, trump criticized cnn for hounding that anonymous reddit user who had the gall to create an anti-cnn gif featuring the president. >> what cnn did was unfortunate for them. as you know now they have some pretty serious problems. they have been fake news for a long time. they have been covering me in a very, very dishonest way. with cnn, and others, and bc is equally as bad. despite the fact that i made them a fortune with the apprentice, but they forgot tha that. i will say that cnn has really taken it too seriously, and i think they've hurt themselves very badly. very, very badly. >> tucker: whoa. that led the newscast on lots of other channels today, overpaid cable anchors calling it

unpatriotic, criticized demo being on foreign soil. watch. >> american presidents traveling abroad typically uphold american values such as press freedom and the institution of the presidency. mr. trump, for his own reasons, did not. >> he got savaged for a attacks against the people in the media. it does not help his poll numbers. >> a piece of everything he said, the timing on foreign soil in a region of the world where the questionable question of ps important. no other president in our lifetime would say such a thing. >> tucker: you couldn't make it up. so now, joe, it's unpatriotic. by the way, the president, we open this. i'm not a defender of the guy, but he just gave a speech defending western civilization, and freedom of expression. but now the press is telling us it's unpatriotic for him to

criticize them. how does that work? i thought it would be bad to criticize soldiers, but out cable anchors are in the same category question might >> it works the way of selective outrage, tucker. i don't know if he saw maxine waters tweet that came on just couple hours ago. she said about donald trump, our president on foreign soil with foreign leaders, because apparently this against the rules as well, only a week and impotent leader would spend more time attacking his predecessor in the free press than those in the world truly threatening us. when i looked at the twitter feed, and some other people that you feature. no one is condemning miss waters for making that mistake of criticizing a president what he is overseas. so until i see that, this is the definition of selective outrage and it is phony. >> tucker: but is this a long-standing tradition that you don't criticize cable anchors when you are outside of american borders?

is that an assault on our flag and our history do you think? >> i don't believe so. i believe that is trump exercising his first amendment rights. he was asked a question from a reporter about that cnn situation yesterday, you talked about it on your show with mark stein, there was a colorful conversation, particular the horse in the bed thing from the godfather, as far as cnn tracking down an anonymous troll who created a twitter meme, wrestling meme of trump wrestling a logo to the ground. so silly and so preposterous known or take it seriously. in the network actually threatening to expose this person if he acted inappropriately on the internet ever again. that's called boxing. that selling those condemned by the left and the right. cnn, i was just another self-inflicted wound that the president was addressing during a press conference where he was asked a question and gave an answer. is he a traditional president? no. but you ask a question to give an answer, that's how it works. >> tucker: you get a lot out of laughing at things once

in a while. you can't be outraged all the time about everything, it's not a good look. so what's going on. you are a meaty reporter and follow the step carefully. cnn has had an awful lot of crises in the past few weeks. is there any indication that the people that run the place are looking within and saying "may boyd and make all the mistakes we are accused of, but we made some are going to fix them." is there any of that? >> i don't see that in terms of public comments, twitter feeds of the on-air personalities and the network president. they seem to be playing the card that they are the victims here. that donald trump, the president, is bullying them. the conservative media is bullying them. they don't seem to be acknowledging the myriad of mistakes that they have made. i would say this is the worst stretch in the 37 year history of cnn. just think of the aggregate for a second. you had two major attractions in june. one of which involved anthony scaramucci who was a trump ally that led to three resignations of highly decorated reporters. kathy griffin holding up the fake severed head of donald trump. that led to her getting fired from the network's new year's eve coverage.

a host who was fired because he called the president a pos. producers caught on camera and undercover videos talking about how the narrative in russia is mostly b.s., and american voters are stupid, and obviously the july 4th the situation with the reddit troll. all these things in aggregate, tucker, is horrible. today you had their political editor at large, who actually put up a video, a 22nd video, that appeared to show donald trump being blown off by the polish first lady. except that, if you watch that video for four more seconds, by the way, they say oh, my god, oh my on his twitter feed in all caps. if you watch the whole thing, of course she shakes president trump's hand. she went to millenia trump first, and she shook donald trump's hand again. you have this important person there, not understanding that there is so much scrutiny around this network that when you put up fake videos like that with

false editing, it only leads to the perception that cnn is the opposition party. that is why when a harvard study comes out, 92% of the coverage of the term administration is negative. this only feeds to the narrative that cnn is not acting like the impartial, objective network they claim to be. >> tucker: i still have friends there. i think they are dying. it's so embarrassing for them. >> it's a tough business, and for this to happen on a daily basis, i could imagine what it's like. unless you're on-air, you don't get paid a lot and the hour stinks and you work weekends, and to see -- i feel sorry for some of the producers i know over there. >> tucker: and run like a political campaign, noted journalist. joe, thank you. appreciate it. peta, they are being called sexist after they used bikini models to protest at wimbledon. does anyone deserve to win this left-wing civil liberty mutual stood with us when a fire destroyed everything in our living room. we replaced it all

without touching our savings. yeah, our insurance won't do that. no. you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.

>> tucker: it's blue versus blue. wimbledon, the animal rights group peta sent a group of bikini-clad models to the tennis torment where they gave strawberries with dairy free cream to promote veganism. sounds harmless enough. but now peta is being denounced by feminists for 70 70 style sm sexism. oddly exported and, no different from milking cows. wendy is a feminist template will and joins us now. wendy, if this bother you, what's likely to go to the beach

where there are literally thousands of women in bikinis? he must go crazy. do try to cover them, how do you respond. >> actually not. it doesn't bother me when i got to the beach. the issue here is around the issue of sexually exploiting women when it comes to the peta ad. whether it's having women in a cage or whether peta does something like telling adults to drink breast milk, it's something that really goes against how we should be looking at women. there's no reason why adults should be asked to drink breast milk. they use these type of explicate of ads to -- >> tucker: i'm sorry, we can get those, but i'm not for adults drink breast milk. >> that's actually why -- >> tucker: i thought feminism is about choice. >> actually feminism is about making sure that women and men have equal rights. so what pete is doing is they're trying to over sexualize women to make people buy their product

and by their mission. at the end of the day, i think that what peta is doing is great, i think it's awesome, nobody believes in animal cruelty and quite frankly if you do, you need to look at yourself, but it is about the mission. if eft is women in a sexual manner to be able to advance your mission, then you have to question whether you have a flawed message. >> tucker: the masco question. the women in question, you are looking at them in the bikinis, are they adults? >> they are. they were adults. they have the right to use their bodies anyway they want to. >> tucker: will that's kind of the question. >> absolutely. >> tucker: they weren't forced at gunpoint to do this. but you are behaving as if they are children being exploited or they are too dumb to know what they are doing or what it means. you know that they are too dumb to know what it means customer >> known as behaving like they are too dumb, no one is behaving as if they are too dumb to know what to do. but we are saying is that if

your mission is solely based on using women and a sexualized manner to get your mission across, then you have to start making pivots to advance your mission in a better way. >> tucker: i just want to bring you back to the question at hand. >> i answered it. >> tucker: these women chose to do this. >> absolutely. >> tucker: i thought part of equality was being able to make your own choices. even others semidisagree with. as an adult, you have that agency, the freedom to do it. >> absolutely. >> tucker: when did these women lose the right to wear bikinis if they want to? >> they never lost that right, tucker. what is being said is that if a company historically has systematically used women in a sexualized manner to continuously tried to get their mission across, whether you have women locked up in a cage or whether you tell adults -- >> tucker: you are making generalizations. >> i'm not making generalizations, i've actually given your specifics about what

peta has done in the past. >> tucker: what if they want to? what if they volunteer for? what if this is their choice? the evidence suggested is their choice. >> it is their choice, but i think what you are doing is you are trying to place blame on the individuals as opposed to looking at the million dollar company. that's what -- that's exactly what you are doing. you keep on asking about the women, it's not about the woman. they were paid for. i'm sure they didn't do it against their will. what we are talking about is the mission. >> tucker: it's not actually about the women? >> it's about the mission of the organization, tucker. they use women to exploit them. that's what the issue is. >> tucker: maybe that's the problem with modern feminism. >> don't know, modern feminism is all about equality, and as a father of three girls i'm surprised you don't see that feminism met us. that's really sad. >> tucker: i live with for women in my house and i treat them like adults because they are.

>> good. and we will not sexualize anybody. >> tucker: thank you for joining us. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: speaking of feminism, one of the organizers of last january's women's march is planning a new protest, this time targeting the nra, that national rifle association. protest comes in the wake of an nra ad in which radio show host dana loesch when after hollywood, and other anti-gun institutions in america. here it is. >> and then they used their ex-president to endorse the resistance. all to make them march, make them protest. make them scream racism and sexism and and a xenophobia and homophobia, the smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law-abiding. >> tucker: dana loesch joins us tonight. her voice is what you heard. are you going to the women's march, dana? >> oh, tucker, it's not the women's market. it's only some women's march.

they don't like pro-life women's groups. they don't like women who want to be in power to use this commitment to defend themselves. i wasn't invited. they don't really like all wome women. >> tucker: i've noticed that. how frustrating is that? if there was a men's march that only accepted certain kinds of men, men who believe only a certain set of things that i happen to not believe, and yet they claim to speak for all men, it would drive me crazy. h feel as a woman when you see this march, presented as a march that every woman? >> while they don't represent everywoman. frankly, tucker, i know that they may try to flail their arms. they get an apology for me or the millions of members of the nra, and one is not coming. i want to state that very clearly. i think my ad is fabulous and absolutely correct. stop running on buildings and we don't have a problem. but i'm not going to be lectured by women's organization that features a key figurehead, convicted terrorist, i'm not good to be lectured to by women where the organizer called for

against president trump just recently while speaking at a pretty extremist conference in 2001. i'm not going to be lectured, tucker, by some only when, only some women, and fact organization where they go after people like -- and they try to share for being a female genital mutilation/comment saying that she needs to be beaten on behalf of a china taken away. so no, i'm not going to be lectured by the fake feminist women's organization. in fact, i dare say that if state fake feminist want to see empowered women, women who actually support and encourage their pew points, they can take a trip to the nra. >> tucker: one that's kind of the obvious point. i spent a lot of time at various protests. he wished the press was honest enough to acknowledge the obvious, which as we go to an nra event, and you go to an event like the women's march, who is happy or? was more polite? was more decent to the people in their immediate vicinity? it's not even close.

just being honest. it's true. >> it's not. we are going to keep people out just based on ideological differences. there are democrats in the nra. there are atheists in the nra. there are pro-choice members, pro-life members. you are not going to find a more varied group. the one thing that members of the nra don't like, and by the way it was from their concerns this ad came, because they were very concerned about a lot of the violent actions that they had seen from the violent faction on the left, one of the things that we all don't support is burning down buildings. or punching people in the face if they are wearing a trump head. or anything like that. that's what we don't support. tucker, this is not a real feminist organization. there only four women who think like them. it's a bigoted, fake feminist women's organ as is. they owe us an apology. at the other way around. >> tucker: dana loesch, great to see you. thanks for coming on. >> i persisted, tucker. >> tucker: did for you. it's been too long since we had

micro on the show. he will be here to talk about the popularity of emojis. what that says about america's work ethic. mike

>> tucker: we never miss a chance to talk with former dirty jobs host mike rowe. recently and set of 50 emojis was released and text messaging. what does that say about the modern world? mike rowe has thought a lot about this, more than you would think he said. here is his view. great to see. >> nice to see you. >> tucker: so emojis, there is a brand-new suite, assortment of emojis. teenagers across america are excited. i sense this is bad. i can't articulate why. what do you think? >> let's see. as i understand asian history we started with hieroglyphics

it appears we may have gone full circle. i don't know how much righteous indignation we can whip up over the emojis, but i am troubled by their quantity. there are hundreds of these things and they seem to have assumed every possible expression, every nuance of feeling seems to now be accessible in this endless pile of emojis. i didn't know, there was that many emotions in the human condition, but now we have to choose which ones to use to express ourselves and to whom and when, so not sure way to simplify things at all. >> tucker: it does seem like they are bypassing language. you know what i mean? more words than any other languages overhead in english. why are people choosing not to use it? >> i think, again, just a theory, but i think this general assault on conventional norms of work which we've talked about ad nauseam before. his blood over into an assault

on the lexicon. >> tucker: like velcro shoes. >> again, it's nothing to get angry about, but it's unnerving. it's disconcerting to look down and see velcro when you expect places. i don't know if it's a harbinger of the end of days, but it is troubling because you have to ask regarding emojis what is next. grunts? interpretive dance? look, we are grown -- grown people are now communicating with texts that say "you are great." it's like the language and mnemonics, we are hooked on phonics with the little emoji things combined. i don't know what's happening, but if you want to make a serious point, what about this. what if this slow degradation of the languages actually in component of the demise of soft

skills? cell skills allow you not to take a phone call during a job and if you, maybe pull your pants up, show up on time. the basic things that many employers but moan today that seem to be conspicuously lacking in much of what you call the employable people looking for jobs. they are not using their words to a degree that's making people excited about hiring them. that ultimately is why the emoji has got to go with the velcro shoes. >> tucker: how big of a part of employment is that? >> the people i talk with who are really try to close the skills gap in their own part of the world, they say it's the most critical thing that nobody talks about. that's passing the drug test. that's half. more than half gone. but the thing that we also talk

about with the skills gap is the lack of skill, obviously. but we discussed the lack of will that fuels it, but also the lack of soft cell skills. i don't know how to interview. know what to say the erosion of that, which is basic, has to be germane to whatever it is we say were talking about. >> tucker: if he can give job -- and i know you do this, but if you can give job advice to someone seeking a job at the lower end, just starting out, what kinds of counsel would you give? >> i would say if you can, put yourself in the chair of the person considering hiring you. say to them exactly what you would hear if you are them. high, it's great to be here. here is the deal. i will be early every day. i will stay late. every day. i will ask you what i can do every day to make your life simpler, if there's a difficult task i will volunteer to do it. i will do so cheerfully, and two years from now i'm going to be

sitting where you are. it's a but he said that to me, i would be like -- i'm not checking your references, i will see you tomorrow. >> tucker: that's unnecessary, you are hired. bigger than i would give them a little smiley face. [laughs] >> tucker: thank you. >> sure. >> tucker: watching him as all the smart kids obsess over the alleged collusion with russia. given that, why it's so interesting that the ties between russia and hillary clinton campaign chairman? we'll discuss a lot on

>> tucker: in poland today, president trump acknowledged that the government of russia may have meddled in last fall's election, but they likely weren't the only country that did. watch. >> at the give her what could have been russia, but i think well could have been other countries, and i will be specific. i think a lot of people interfere. >> tucker: that was on the first questions he got. this russia thing is gone on for months and months and months. innuendo from the press, the democratic party, all of whom have demanded and gotten major investigations of every trump associate for every conceivable type. given that, why is the question almost everybody ignoring possible russia connections on hillary clinton's team? partly they are real. peter schweizer is the author of the book "clinton cash," he is a new op-ed putting out the complex relationship. here's what he says tonight. so peter, is a daily newspaper

reader, i haven't read much about this. give us an outline of what we know. >> yeah, very few people have covered this. we first reported it back in july, and there's new information that's come up. in january of 2011, when john podesta's advising hillary clinton as secretary of state as part of a foreign policy advisory board, advising her on personnel matters, speeches, policy, he joins the board of a boston-based energy company called jewel energy. two months after he joins the board, the russian government in the form of a sovereign wealth fund controlled by vladimir putin -- this is a fund called prudence child, they donate, they invest $35 million into this company. it's a big investment. the company at this point has only raised $110 million. they get board seats, ticket memberships on those executive committees, and john podesta get

75,000 shares of stock in this company. he goes and joins the obama administration in the white house as a senior counselor, he transfers those shares to his kids. but he continues to receive emails updating him on what jewel is doing, and even helping them make decisions. so here you have a situation which john podesta has a commercial relationship directly with the russian government. there are two russians that are sitting on the part of this company along with him, while he is advising hillary clinton on the russian reset and other issues. >> tucker: two quick questions questions. is he allowed to do this from his perch in the federal government? orchestrate decision-making for the company? >> that's a great question, tucker. he was an official advisor but not on the state department payroll when he was with hillary clinton. when he joined the obama

white house, he transferred those shares because he could not hold those shares. the problem is that he says that he fully divested from them, but the emails that came out to wiki links to make leaks sit indicate that he was still making decisions on the shares he on. the kids were not involved. that's the problem. >> tucker: very quickly, is there any reason the -- >> absolutely, it has all kinds of applications. commercial and potentially military. the purpose of this fund was to create jobs in russia, and the $35 million that this company received was ostensibly given to the company or the investment was made to create a manufacturing facility in russia itself. that factory for some reason was never built, and it's unclear what happened to that $35 million. but yes, the kind of biofuels

they were developing definitely had military application, and this commercial relationship between putin and podesta is taking place during the russian reset with all kinds of test transfer going on. >> tucker: amazing. i'm not alleging anything, but i'm glad to know that. peter schweizer, thank you so much for that. up next, everybody knows the story of amelia earhart and her mysterious disappearance. somebody claims to have new evidence that shows she survived that final flight over the pacific. not just some not a conspiracy theory, it

>> tucker: if you grew up in this country, you know the story of amelia earhart. the first woman to fly solo across the atlantic and a genuinely great person. an inspiring story with a sad ending. in 1937, she vanished over the pacific and was never heard from again. ran out of gas, that was it and

that was the prevailing theory. there is new and compelling evidence that she survived her final flight. a long forgotten photograph recently discovered in the national archives shows a woman who very much resembles earhart sitting on a dock in the marshall islands. an island chain then controlled by imperial japan. standing next to the woman is a man who looks a lot like her navigator, fred noonan. it appears to be on a barge in the background. the photo is real. facial recognition experts say it's very likely it's amelia earhart in the picture. if earhart survives, what happened to her? we don't know that and we probably never will. it's likely they were arrested by the japanese and were executed for espionage activity. the japanese government of course says they have no record on any of it but part of the earhart mystery seems to be solved. on that happy note, have a great

night. tune in every night for the show that is tnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnf lying, pomposity, smugness and groupthink. watch "the five." they are in new york. >> kimberly: hello, everyone. i am kimberly guilfoyle. it is 9:00 in new york city and this is "the five." world leaders are converging on germany, getting ready for the big g20 summit. flexing the muscle in the world stage, president trump. a huge reaction in poland while delivering a powerful speech there. we have every angle of the president's big address in warsaw, beginning with pres t