always be fair and balanced. i like the role reversal. today i get to throw to "the five" for a special edition next and we'll see you back tomorrow night. thanks for being with us. million charged to the u.s. taxpayer. here is what president trump

said about his plan to finally win the way. >> we will not talk about numbers of troops or our plans to further military activities. conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables, will guide our strategy from now on. america's enemies must never know our plans or believe they can wait us out. i will not say when we are going to attack, but attack we will. we are not nation-building agai again. we are killing terrorists. >> dana: mr. trump also said he is going to put far more pressure on regional powers to help with the afghan effort. >> we have been paying pakistan billions and billions of dollars, at the same time, they are housing the very terrorists that we are fighting. but that will have to change and that will change immediately.

no partnership can survive a country's harboring of terrorists who target u.s. service members and officials. india makes billions of dollars in trade with the united states. and we want them to help us war with afghanistan. especially in the area of economic assistance and development. >> dana: the president also offered a warning of sorts, saying his administration's commitment to the afghan cause was not absolute. >> america will work with the afghan government, as long as we see determination and progress. however, our commitment is not unlimited. and our support is not a blank check. the government of afghanistan must carry their share of the military, political, and economic burden. the american people expect to see real reforms, real progress,

and real results. >> dana: all right, prime time addressed by the president. a policy that has been under discussion for many months of the white house, one of the first things the president asked for, a review of everything. some of it leaked out, sort of in july, but as of friday, when the president made a final decision, i got to say, there were no leaks out of that. he gave his speech tonight. what was the lead up like? what you think of the results? 's before i saw you on twitter, saying that you were stunned by the lead up not being that exciting, this is a president giving his first major foreign policy address. he is talking about war and peace and he is talking about finally winning this war, by the way, which is a big deal. >> dana: it's like his first primetime address. >> ed: especially on a policy issue of this gravity. here is a bottom line, one word, leadership. he stepped up to the plate tonight. he had a rough week last week and he said that i am going to show leadership. he admitted that basically this

is a flip-flop, that is not easy for any president to do, especially this president, who likes to show that he is tough. he said again and again before he was running at when he was running, going back to at least 2011, "get out," he said if he is elected, he is outcome enough with the money, lost lives, misadventure. but he got behind the desk in the oval office and he was like to make tough decisions. he kept using the other word, not just leadership, win. we are going to win. he will have to come up with more details. his supporters, when you say that, say, wait a second, we don't want to tell the tale of and how we are going to win. i get that. but you have to at least have some sort of a blueprint beyond, yes, he said, we will kill cap terrorists. everyone wants to kill terrorists. i think that is something people can rally around. but how you are going to actually do that, he still didn't lay out the details. however, big picture, a leadership moment for him. he stepped up to the plate big

time. >> dana: kimberly, one of the big news parts of the speech, which might have seemed subtle because he didn't dwell on it too much, was the fact that he called out pakistan in particular and then he leaned towards india more, so this is a broader regional strategy than he was trying to lay out. basically putting pakistan on notice. we know what you are doing, harboring these terrorists, we want to accept it anymore. those countries pay very close attention to with the president says, so pakistan thinks of the president of the united states has india and its favorite column, that well maybe get them to do something about it. >> kimberly: this, for me, was my favorite part of the speech. for me, this was the headline, the lead. it is about time, because pakistan has been harboring terrorists and supporting the network, they have been receiving untold amounts of money and support, coalition building to help fight counterterrorism measures. what have we gotten for our money? what have we gotten? 's they had usama bin laden

living large over there, we are not honest about that, we had to take matters into our own hands. americans are sick of their hard earned money going over there to a country that is not being the right partner in this bargain, in this fight against terrorists. they should be held accountable, ducked up with the spurs in them. that is what he did tonight. in terms of having a strategic plan, listening to kelly, they agreed the pressure in pakistan is the right way to do, to squeeze them, get more out of their effort, which really has been middling to none, up until this point. look at what president trump did come he said he would do this with isis, we have seen that he has been beating them back, i count on him to do the same here, and it is tough. he did say, basically an about-face, a bout afghanistan. he is listening to the people in the theater, he is listening to the special forces they are, the cia agents, and they are telling him, this is what needs to be done, and putting more troops,

making that commitment, that is leadership, and that is courage, and to sing, i didn't have the information before, i have it now, and i will follow through and do the right thing. >> dana: excellent cowgirl reference, by the way. this birth? excellent. a couple of things that he is not able to spell it directly, because he, greg, will say, i won't tell you exactly what we are going to do. one of the things that we don't know, although we kind of know, the rules of engagement have changed. there way that we are doing intelligence in the region is changing, the way we are sharing it is changing, and you are kind of smiling. i'm not sure why. >> greg: a smirk. ed was giving me the eye. >> dana: that's interesting. what i was going to ask you, president trump makes the decision that leaving was worse than staying, and if you stay, he may as well try to win. >> greg: i think so. he's a typical neocon globalist. i kid. you knew this was different. how did you know this was

different? one key factor. he said pakistan, not pah-kistan. you go, oh, things are changing, things are going down. the man is saying pakistan, so, you knew this was a shift. so he is looking at the way pakistan is to the tally band, the way china is to north korea. so, he said, this is your mass, body, you want to clean it up. that leads to the next part, which is the mission statement. he finally gave a mission statement that was localized and specific and practical, which is, he is telling the world, he is also telling people like rand paul and a lot of people, this is a nation-building anymore. we are just here to kill terrorists. it's like a guy saying, look, dude, i'm just here to paint the roof, i'm not doing any demolition, i am a union guy, i can only do one thing.

>> kimberly: shingled roof. >> greg: like a subcontractor. the reason why, this is important, what we are dealing with, this is not to like world war ii, which we finish in under four years. we keep talking about links with this. this isn't really a war. what this is is dealing with something that will never go away, and that is radical islam. the goal here in afghanistan, and elsewhere, is to prevent terror and nuclear holocaust. you prevent terror by seeking out the terrorists and you prevent nuclear holocaust make sure that the dirty bombs or any nukes that pakistan has ends up in the hands of these terrorist terrorists, so the only way you can do that is by constantly being there. i'm sorry, but you can call this a neocon fantasy, but as long as there is islamism, we are going to have to be out there, and we have to be looking for these terrorists, and it's just something that is going to be there. that is why the idea of bringing up 16 years, 17 years, this is not -- >> dana: it's not the way to

measure it. >> greg: the world has changed. we aren't fighting japan, we aren't fighting a nation state, we are fighting a loosely knit group of actions that are all over the place. when you think is going to die, it comes right back up. it's an idea. >> ed: isn't it interesting, that america, he has strung together has bigger victories, standing down with north korea, and on the domestic front, he is struggling on taxes and health care and trying to get that back on track. but on the world stage, he is showing more leadership than his critics ever thought. >> dana: juan, he talked about the nato partners needing to pay more and help more. i don't know if you give them enough credit for things they have done until now. they have had to sacrifice his and, as well. there has been some help, but one thing that has been different, that has been leaking out a little bit, was that the president might try to reach out to the taliban, and go to talk with them. when he gave the final speech

tonight, that was really not in there, so it might be a little more skeptical on that because some thought that talking to the taliban, signaling that, was like giving a date certain like president obama did, which would let them wait it out. >> juan: it did make my eyes look over when i heard him say that he would allow the taliban to be included in a new government with afghanistan. i have never heard such a thing. the taliban has been killing americans, they are part of the problem. you have them in cahoots with isis, the isis network that exists within pakistan and in afghanistan. but i think there are a couple interesting things here. one, off the top, the president is clearly trying to get away from what happened last week in charlottesville. he spent, i would say, a quarter of the top of the speech talking about racial healing -- >> greg: that's our next block, juan. >> juan: i am just telling you, getting away from the idea that he is still reacting to charlottesville and trying to move away from it, and trying to move away from it by projecting

strength as a military leader. so he is surrounded now by all the generals, steve bannon is gone, who oppose the idea of staying, suggested that we either outsource it, hire some people, may be some private soldier types, mercenaries, or just pull out, just leave, because he said there is no political payoff. with that we study has, really, his base is in line with president trump who was pleading, hay, too much money, too many debts, what are we getting out of bed? and i think they still have that question because tonight, i didn't hear any specific numbers. fox news is reporting about 4,000, but no one thinks 4,000 troops will make a huge difference on the ground. >> kimberly: it depends on who they are. >> juan: he didn't say, here's what i want to do, so this was in reaction to president obama, having expressed a timeline. but the question then becomes,

so exactly what is the u.s.'s commitment? how much longer can we be there, and we are not involved in nation building, a shot at president president bush, president obama, but the questis back, letting the generals on the military advisors and set your court. well, what exactly is the victory? it should be a stable afghanistan were a threat to the united states cannot be generated. >> dana: to greg's point, trying to measure that and say to people, this will be done in two years, that is giving people false hope. he didn't do that tonight. that is part of leadership, too. i think that it's really hard, to not be able to define it. >> juan: to that point, what you are saying, it is open ended. he said, this is not open ended, it's not a blank check. >> greg: before that, you said, he is letting that military commanders decide the stuff. why is that idea?

>> juan: he surrounded himself with generals. >> ed: they know more about her than the president does. >> juan: they should be informing the president, but he needs people who will say to him, listen, wait a second, not only do we have political concerns in the united states about the fact that we have this longest war in u.s. history, but there are concerns in other ways to go at this. in terms of going out pakistan. >> greg: . if you are talking about the people that he is surrounded by, he is surrounded by men who no loss. his chief of staff lost a child in war. this is not about being hawks or doves. these are thoughtful, careful warriors who know what the cost is, we did talk about it being open ended, i they are talking about it being specific, small,

agile, ruthless. get rid of them. it's not a large, static army that becomes a target. it is brutal and we'll take it to them as quickly as possible. >> juan: the hawks are screeching at the white house because it when it was suggested that it would just be a counterterrorism operation, they said, no. we want to do more, and we want to try to get the afghan army up on its feet so that they can fight the war. >> dana: that's what he said. here's the thing. i do think that there has been some ambiguity in the previous administration, they afghan government did not know. the president has several audiences all at once tonight. one with the military, it's important to hear for him. the citizens at large, the enemy, then, the allies, like nato, then, the afghan people and government. they can wake up in the morning or they probably are already awake, and they wake up and they say, look, guys, here's our chance. he said he is with us. it's not open-ended. we have got to get our act together. kimberly, i'll give you the next

word. >> kimberly: thank you, dana. god bless you. as if it, buddy. trump is trying to impact the psychology of the situation in afghanistan and trying to empower the people and their military they are to be able to stand up to the taliban, stand up to al qaeda, to know that they have the backing, on resoundingly, the united states. without question. i'm going to trust that he has done his homework, and listening to people that he should, that have military service, and have been in that theater and understand, yes, loss and they understand strategy and what they need to do and that geopolitical region. they will make a very specific determination about the troops that are there, what kind, special forces, operators, covert ops, all of the above, to make sure that it is technical and that they have information and real-time intelligence coming from the ground. let them do their jobs, i will take him at his word for that.

>> juan: talavera not tah-libahn. >> dana: there has been a lot of difficulty providing safe space for women and girls and women to leave their house without fear. >> kimberly: ending the taliban sanctuary, because they always have some hole to crawl into. pakistan has been harboring them. shame on them. go and blow up their sanctuaries. we do coming up, president trump began his speech with some powerful words about the state of affairs in america. we will play that for you next. we will play that for you next. ♪

for years, centurylink has been promising fast internet to small businesses. but for many businesses, it's out of reach. why promise something you can't deliver? comcast business is different.

♪ ♪ we deliver super-fast internet with speeds of 250 megabits per second across our entire network, to more companies, in more locations, than centurylink. we do business where you do business. ♪ ♪ >> kimberly: i love that song. welcome back, president trump surprised some by beginning his afghanistan speech with a discussion of some of those problems at home. to speak of part of america hurts, we all hurt. and when one citizen suffers an injustice, we all suffer together. loyalty to our nation demands loyalty to one another. love for america requires love for all of its people.

when we open our hearts to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice, no place for bigotry, and no tolerance for hate. let us make a simple promise to the men and women we ask to fight in our name, that when they return home from battle, they will find a country that has renewed for sacred bonds of love and loyalty that unite us together as one. >> kimberly: greg? >> greg: oh, i thought that was very powerful. he is using the military as a model for unity, a microcosm of the country. he is right, it's true. the military succeeded because it operates under one identity, they are all americans defending the country. the military is probably the only government a social experiment that has worked because of that achievement as a goal. it doesn't matter? onto the people i don't like him. it doesn't matter what he says. it's right and it's true but it

ain't going to work. juan, you will tear it apart probably. but it was right, and true, and smart. i don't think it matters to the people that hate him. >> kimberly: very interesting. dana? >> dana: i was trying to remember where had i heard him say that before. it was at the inaugural address. at the inaugural, everyone across the board, even though they didn't like them, they had to agree that this with the line they like, "when you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice." he used the same construction tonight and put it into this context of what we have gone through as a country in the last week. i think he had to do it, he had to address it in some way, or else everybody would say, he didn't talk about it. >> greg: in that voice. [laughter] >> dana: i think that if he hadn't done it, then there wouldn't have been a question. he was probably itching to say something. twitter was on the right place to do it, he doesn't want to do an interview, he he is this big

decision, announcement in front of a military audience, as we mentioned, that was an important message because everybody around the world was watching. >> kimberly: absolutely. you could see tonight, in terms of the feedback from it, ed, you touched on this earlier, very well received. >> ed: absolutely. i think the timing couldn't be better, in terms of trying to dig out from last week. yesterday, "the new york times" had an editorial. they had been out to get the president from day one, let's just be honest. the editorial yesterday, he is feeling the office, a rolling disaster of a presidency, divorced from decency and common sense. okay. has he made mistakes? yes. but give me a break with these hysterical reactions. he comes out tonight and says, let's use the u.s. military as a model, as greg said, for people coming together around a common purpose. that is pretty darn good. pretty obvious. again, maybe he should have said more obvious stuff last week but he did announce the neo-nazis.

he came out and said something at the top that i think reframed us and i think coming on the heels of this "new york times" editorial, that was divorced from reality itself. a good night for him. >> kimberly: i think it was a pivotal point. coming out of that, being able to coalesce, be presidential, and this really has been his strongest speech and also, like you said, in terms of the way he is perceived internationally, as a world leader, -- 's before he was left up when he was stepping up the rhetoric with kim jong un. oh, my gosh, what is he doing? he is out of control? this will be a disaster. millions of people are going to be killed. fire and fury, how could he do this? then, kim jong un crawls back into a hole, all of all of a sudden, guam is not a target, obviously, the north korea situation is not done. we have to deal with it. short-term, medium-term, long-term. they still have the missiles,

they will keep testing. its only danger. however, he was laughed at, he was mocked. at least in this first round, he won for you to >> kimberly: you are right, guam was based timing, a good relationship. it is going so well, i know you agree, juan. >> juan: i was thinking it was the eclipse because it seems like you guys are blind to reality. >> kimberly: we can still hear. >> dana: [laughs] >> juan: i heard donald trump stand up there, and he tries to come again, the u.s. military has long been a model of success in terms of race relations, but donald trump then finds the opportune moment to use them as a ploy to say, you know, that stuff i was saying, when i didn't understand what nazis and white supremacists and a neo-nazis, i forgot what world war ii was about, and real american patriots shutting blood to fight those nazis, there was no equivalent.

instead, now he is saying, oh, yeah, when you fight a war, or you should be able to come home, so if we have never had these arguments. victory at home over the races, oh, no, never before. this is brand-new. this, to me, i think -- >> greg: are you, perhaps. >> juan: the absolute most cheap use of our military. he has damaged his presidency in a way that he will not recover for recover from. >> greg: you just prove my point. if he didn't say anything, juan, "he didn't say anything -- he said something, he is a nazi!" >> kimberly: juan is a real writer behind "the new york times" editorial. >> juan: if he decided to do this directly -- i wouldn't believe him if that is what you are saying. >> greg: exactly.

there's nothing he can do. we just should have skipped you. >> juan: you say he can't plead about it, but if he gives a speech or takes actions, if he speaks to the idea about how we can to a better job of somehow healing this country -- >> greg: you would still laugh at him. you just did. >> kimberly: these are two separate issues. i think it is very disingenuous to suggest that the president of the united states would squander lives to get himself out of a political pickle. he has been working on a strategy in afghanistan and he wouldn't send men and women over there to serve if he didn't think it was the right thing to do. >> juan: that's not what i was saying. it sounds like he is using this opportunity, kimberly -- >> kimberly: that's the same thing. >> juan: to try to project presidential leadership on the back of this horrific thing in charlottesville. >> kimberly: have brought the thing that is mattis and kelly have been reading about this and working on the strategy, and he followed their advice? >> juan: listen, i think this

is a different conversation. this was supposed to be -- if you want to ask me, as i said to you earlier, he has surrounded himself with generals, hawks at their loudest screeching, fine, but don't tell me -- >> greg: these guys know more about loss than you do, juan. >> juan: i haven't lost my son -- >> greg: then don't call them a screeching halt. >> juan: they are all generals. >> kimberly: that's not fair! embarrassing people that serve in the military. no, i am telling you, because you are giving a speech here and embarrassing everybody, including men and women that serve in the military for calling them all -- no. you have done it on multiple shows over and over and over again. bad mouthing the military, badmouthing the generals. >> juan: that's not true. >> kimberly: how low will he go? well, obviously. we are way over on time. you can take the whole next block. you won't believe what terrorists are trying to use at

as weapons now. greg will tell you about it after this break. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

>> greg: the right of the day is eclipse, but not for the reasons you think. i am always full mix by how one story can eclipse another. before our attention spans were reduced to that of skittish gnats, we spent time on a story, now, two big ones it slipped right by us. both about foil the plots. one in barcelona, still killed 14 people, but the themes intended to kill 100 times that. targeting a popular tourist attraction, the basilica basilica, using vance back with explosives. they blew each other up instead in an apartment, but the

survivors resorted to killing tours with a van. another plot involved explosives, placed in a meat grinder, meant to take down an australian jet grinder. the bombs didn't make it on the flight because the luggage they were in was 50 pounds over the limit. that should provide you know comfort. that plot failed, not because they were foiled, because the creeper screwed up. that is pretty scary. still, and our world, statues are a higher priority than our relentless plan to destroy us. statues don't move, terrorists do. they won't stop until you are eliminated. the more we eclipse that stark truth, the more we remain in the dark, our lives my has a creeps who pine for the dark ages. the media says we are not supposed to look directly at an eclipse, they don't want you to look at a barcelona or australia airports, either. juan, going to first, getting you out of the way. stop sweating. that airline plot was foiled by a silly mistake they made

packing the suitcase. i think we talked about this plot last week are two weeks ago. they overpack. that is how they were stopped. that should scare you. >> juan: it does. it's not only that, there are so many now, for example, in the spanish situation, they blew themselves up. if they hadn't blown themselves up, they would've had the gas cans, their intent was to do far greater damage. you just have to understand -- >> greg: around with the underwear bomber? >> ed: he blew up himself, trying to take down an entire plane. it >> juan: i have a lot of faith and trust in the idea thas are working hard and trying their best. i don't know -- i don't want to accept this as the new normal, but i do think of guy in the woods is trying to blow up a movie theater, i don't know how you stop all of that. by the way, i didn't appreciate your comment there about

statues. i think statues, and that context, can inspire the type of behavior that leads people to be killed. >> greg: when you find that, let me know. kimberly, what is it about human nature that requires an actual act to take place for them to wise enough? instead, when something is prevented, we just get on with our lives. >> kimberly: an old adage, greg. seeing is believing. >> greg: very good. >> kimberly: trying to save time. it's true. the horror and what happened, the viciousness, the depravity that was waged against the united states on 9/11, everybody was four measures in making sure, supporting the president, doing those we need to do for national security, protecting us, keeping us safe. sadly, time passes and it becomes, okay, did we forget about this? we are here and we are witnessing these things happening throughout the world and across europe. that should be a wake up enough

and a reminder enough, but nevertheless, unless it is something that we can have some kind of -- tangible, we can touch it, feel it, see it, it almost doesn't exist. it is written about, but it's not real. it is and manifested up with us. >> greg: i just remembered, juan. you are right. confederates are linked to explosives. a guy tried to blow up the confederate statue and was caught. you were right. i missed that. >> juan: what about the car running over the girl? >> greg: that it was in about a statue, we don't think by that guy was a nazi. >> juan: why were they walking around the tiki torches? >> greg: those guys were nazis. the three i think they use it as a rallying call. >> greg: ed. >> ed: as were reading it about the two plots, it made me think about, we are going to hear about the nitpicking about the president strategy on afghanistan. the 2012 campaign for president obama said, isis is on the run. he said usama bin laden is dead, gm is alive. 2013, he's reluctant, he says,

isis -- you are still talking about these plots, years later, from isis and al qaeda. >> dana: you took my points. >> ed: if they were the jv squad, and they are still alive and well. speak to that is what happened on flight 93. six terrorists, they were only five, because of my particular fight, one of them screwed up, got turned away by the border patrol. i am not sure -- i don't know if it's the mainstream media that is driving our distraction. i wonder if it's the other way around. social media is driving media now. the good news is, there are government -- we still have enough confidence in them to be doing what we need to do to protect us but everybody in america can enjoy the eclipse today and have a moment to enjoy and not be terrified.

that is a measure of success. >> greg: we share blame, we are so easily distracted, it is not just the media, we are looking for it. we can't keep our eyes on anything much longer -- by the way, a good tease for the eclipse. >> juan: before we go, i want to say, the president said, we come because of our military, i think in all fairness, may be intelligence agencies, they are the ones who stopped another 9/11 from happening in this country. >> greg: it's true. all right. up next, the democrats have a massive problem and i can't blame president trump for this one. one. details directly ahead.

you won't see these folks at the post office. one. details directly ahead. they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale.

go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again. when only the best will do... one of a kind tempur-pedic delivers. only tempur material precisely conforms to your weight, shape and temperature. it provides up to twice as much pressure relieving power, so you won't toss and turn. and tempur-pedic is the best at minimizing motion transfer from your partner. you'll wake up, feeling like a champion. now through september 17th, save up to $500 on select adjustable sets. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com

speed through the turmoil in the trump white house has been well-documented, but now, we are learning that the democrats are having problems of their own. last month, republicans raised $6 million more than democrats, who are their worst fund-raising numbers for the month of july

since 2007. now, some in washington are beginning to take notes. speak of the brand is a disaster. the party brand has been so wrecked over the last year, wikileaks has played into that, and what do here when you talk to people on the hill, all the energy is outside of the party. >> juan: this is an interesting point, because you see the energy, as he said, outside the party, with people who are anti-trump. is that enough to generate money? some people shut me down but i will open it up to you in the generous spirit of my heart. >> kimberly: in a return volley that's amazing, i want to know what your explanation is, why do you think they didn't get good numbers? >> juan: by the dnc didn't get good numbers? i think they have good new leadership, a lot of the bernie sanders people were angry, they thought the dnc, debbie wasserman schultz has become a whipping girl for the republicans.

it is interesting to note, though, if you look at the sunny races in the house races, and the house campaign committees, they are doing just as well as the republican counterparts. it is the dnc, the democratic national committee. >> kimberly: maybe there are they are dissatisfied. they feel like they did into a very good job in the past election. didn't get the house, didn't get the senate, the oval. >> ed: lines of democratic donors who were demanding, where's the money we gave hillary clinton? donald trump posted how he was spending far less money. number two, i also think grassroots of the democratic party may be far ahead of the democratic leadership. just like we saw on the republican party. donald trump said he is not sitting around waiting for the rnc, he said, he will win this nomination. frankly, the democrats might end up with someone who is not a washington insider and then i might be good for them. >> juan: dana, would you go to

hillary clinton? would you go to barack obama? elizabeth warren? try to energize the -- >> dana: two of those are irrelevant and two of those are a total distraction. i wouldn't go to any of those. ideas and message trumps money. not only is the rnc out raising the dnc, but the national public and congressional committee, the committee that is in charge of house races, they see their recruitment is excellent. they are getting really good candidates, they can run back in those districts. last week, the political report took five of the senate races from toss-up to lean g.o.p. in the middle of all this. the republican infighting is ugly but it's not affecting the results. >> greg: the reason why the dnc are having a problem is that they have yet to come up with an alternative to someone that they think is evil. they have been spending six months calling donald trump

evil, hitler, stalin, you name it, but they don't have an alternative. the reason why is because when i look at -- when they look at trump's deeds, north korea went back in their hole, the regulations are reduced, stock market is up, all you have is an emotional page. the dnc is no different than a celebrity on twitter right now, boiling over, writhing in their own anger, for they have a couple with an alternative. i will go back to come under president obama, i wanted his liberal policies to fail but the country to succeed. i didn't route it gives the country, i rooted against his policies because they wanted his policies to die an early death so they don't grow and get worse. i wanted the country to -- but in this case, they want the whole thing to collapse. they want the that man villain that is donald trump to take the whole ship down. they don't care. that is why they are making -- not making any money. people are looking at them and going, what have you got?

all you have is hate. you put hillary, this guy that you claimed is so evil, and you still can't find anybody. you are calling up obama, you have hillary wandering around, but you can't find anybody to match somebody you claim is evil. what is your problem? you are so -- it's like midnight. it is my drinking time. did i go too far? >> dana: i think you did great. >> juan: i got to say, i think when you look at the dnc, the energy and the bayside that could come back to bite them. before you know what greg is doing? he is trying to stay? awoke. >> juan: if you weren't able to catch today's solar eclipse, don't worry, you won't have to wait so long for the next one. we will share our clips story straight ahead

♪ ♪ >> ed: today, something truly incredible happened. happened. greg made sense.

actually, this. for a few minutes, ten of tens of millions of americans looked away from their cell phones to stare at something else, the first total eclipse of the sun to cross the u.s. in 99 years. even the president and the u.s. had a great time watching the light show. what do you think? dana, i know you have a special memory. >> dana: my mom and barb, they went to wyoming, they are there now with my family, my mom in the green, and that is kelly, a cousin of mine. wyoming was my totality. i asked my mom, did it live up to the hype? she said beyond. she loved it. >> juan: i have friends in oregon and they were telling me, to them, it felt like unbelievable, they got chills. i'm thinking, really? i didn't understand. i think of it as a primal experience, this is something way about out of our control, it reminds us that there is a god,e cosmetics energy or energy that

things have to be aligned in such a certain way for us on this fragile earth, our home to exist. it's just inspiring. you see president trump looking up at it with his kids, i was on a train, and i was going through philadelphia, people staring up at the sky. it was like, we are one at this moment. >> greg: obviously, this is a hoax. just like the moon landing. it was done on a soundstage in anaheim to hide the fact that the earth is flat. it was engineered to keep the earth is round people in power. >> juan: does that answer the earlier question? >> kimberly: what a lunatic. >> ed: he's not making sense right now. maybe it's a late hour. >> kimberly: he needs to get his meatballs. >> ed: did you have an interesting experience? >> kimberly: yes, i did. i was terrified to look up directly so i watch it on tv. >> ed: i got off the train, i came over to fox, and their

people lined up outside of fox. fox employees, others from other buildings. there were so many people staring up at the sky. >> greg: is like when lou dobbs is here. everyone just -- >> dana: they told the bosses, we need to stay out for a little bit longer. it was a pretty cool day. >> ed: even though we weren't try to run my totality, times square was cool. >> greg: i stole a lot of wise man, i'm nervous about things i can't control... affecting my good credit score. i see you've planted an uncertainty tree. chop that thing down. the clarity you seek... lies within the creditwise app from capital one. creditwise helps you protect your credit. and it's completely free for everyone. it's free for everyone? do hawks use the stars to navigate? i don't know. aw, i thought you did. i don't know either. either way it's free for everyone. cool. what's in your wallet?

>> dana: that is it for us tonight. thanks for watching our analysis of the presidents primetime address on afghanistan. we'll see you tomorrow at our regular time, 9:00 p.m. eastern. have a great -- tactical artill weapons. >> there's pause for a reset at the top of the hour. this is a fox news alert. live coverage of president trump's address to the nation. his first prime time address in which the president will announce his administration's new afghanistan policy. delivering the speech in front of u.s. service members up the road at fort myer, virginia. i'm brett behr. >> i'm martha mccallum. the president is expect to ask india and pakta