she declined saying his schedule was jam-packed. you bet. our friends on "the five" are ready to go. that's it from us tonight. see you tomorrow. >> dana: hello, everyone. i am dana perino. here with kimberly guilfoyle, juan williams, jesse watters, and brian kilmeade. it is 9:00 in new york city and this is "the five." tonight, president trump turned up the heat on north korea adding economic pressure on top of his fiery military threat. he widened u.s. sanctions in an effort to further constrict the defiant regimes trade with the outside world. >> today i am announcing a new executive order we just signed. it significantly expands our authorities to target individuals, companies, financial institutions that finance and facilitate trade

with north korea. china -- their central bank -- has told their other banks, it's a massive banking system, to immediately stop doing business with north korea. >> dana: will it work? doesn't sound like the north is taking mr. trump's warnings very seriously. >> if they thought they could scare us with the sound of a dog barking, that's a silly dream. >> dana: kim jong un chiming in. according to state news, the mad dictator said trump is deranged and will pay dearly for his threats. a lot of bluster, jesse. one thing we did find out today is after president trump made those announcements, we did have china tell the bank of china -- no more dealing with north korea. south korea, japan, even russia and australia saying the north has got to stop.

it could be that kim jong un feels even more isolated than he was. >> jesse: bad day for rocket man. i think he's a little bit nervous at this point. two things, the chinese bank. the executive order of president trump. a big one-two punch. you have a huge diplomatic victory for the president. the tough rhetoric. the heightening level of rhetoric is scaring some people into taking action. it also shows the chinese are willing to take a loss in order to curtail their neighbors behavior. we still have our cards to play, though. you can still do ship inspections, fuel ban. slap travel bands on the rocket man. i do not know where he's going. financial sanctions i get him. wine and cheese restrictions.

the key point is, it's at the democrats taking shots at the president for this dark and dangerous u.n. speech? they look fullest. our asian partners, the japanese and south koreans came out today and said the u.n. speech is strong and effective. it's time for america to speak with one voice when it comes to north korea. california is in the cross hairs. it doesn't make any sense to talk -- the time for talk is over. i looked at opinion polls. 50% of americans believe that if economic sanctions do not work, they will support military action but a majority of americans also believe that the north koreans are bluffing. there's still a little runway left. >> juan: do know what i can't get over? i think they called our president go-tard someone who is elderly and people of mind. >> dana: way to get the thesaurus out in north korea. >> juan: i think i know

american u.s. english pretty well. i've never heard of joe tired. i thought it was a play on words that he did not understand. >> jesse: lost in translation. >> dana: one kim jong un size that this is a dog barking, the truth is -- the dog can also bite. let's take a look at mcmaster. >> what will be the definition of being forced to defend ourselves? >> an actual attack? >> of course. of course. >> dana: i'm curious. what are we going to define as an attack? >> kimberly: on an ally, right? that's got to be something delineated. very good question. it could be far more encompassing and it's something they are going to put down in writing and be specific about of head of time. tests that a bright line. i do want to say redline. is it someone we consider to be an ally of the united states?

u.s. troops as well as the military, that something we would react very swiftly to and with fire and fury, the president has stated. i really like circling back to the sanctions. this was an important economic step to put a little bit of a bite on north korea and let them know. it was also an opportunity for coalition building with other countries that support the u.s. in this regard. to protect the united states so people won't say the president acted with impulsivity or recklessness, that he sought some consensus and tried to go through the normal diplomatic means by putting in sanctions, trying to have talks until we have exhausted all reasonable measures. >> brian: a couple things stand out. the president is getting very good at letting other people convey his policies. if matt lauer doesn't really think he should be president or

says what is this businessman know? say that to the h.r. mcmaster, an active general. if you don't like the diplomatic approach, they are there willing to defend it. what is president trump know? you're a steven mnuchin to say this is exactly what we are doing. he's orchestrating, putting people out there. you've got a great omb director. he knows his stuff back informants. the president is doing something that's hard. how are you going to talk to the chinese leader? how may times have you talked to abe of japan? the most active person. moon is the south korean leader. he is liberal and wait a second, they might not get along but he sat down today and said i've really gotten to know president trump. i don't have the translation. we've talked so much, so often. next thing you know, he put in

the time it is getting some results. a lot of times you would think a new politician who is used to instant gratification -- the ceo of his own company -- what you have to call this guy again? i just spoke to them. but he's doing it. >> dana: president trump has not been in new york this many days in a row since before the inauguration. it's a lot of time. most presidents complain. you don't hear any of that even behind the scenes. it seems like it was time well spent because president trump is going to need to pick up the phone and call these leaders. having that personal relationship, the one on one means a lot. >> jesse: may be moon can him what doe dotard means. he's always criticized for being the cowboy that doesn't understand politics. yes, in the first seven months of this administration, he's established strong, diplomatic and personal relationships with a lot of these world leaders. not just our asian partners but in europe, emmanuel macron in paris, may -- president obama

really wasn't a people person on the world stage. i don't remember one leader that even comes to mind who i can say -- who says obama really had a bond with this guy. >> dana: famous best friend on the world stage? >> jesse: i think it's trump's experience with business. >> juan: there is a different view available and it comes not only from liberals but conservatives with what has been going on. if you look up at the chinese said in response to what the president has done -- they said his language so far, not helpful. the russians said this is engaging in military hysterics. they don't see this as promoting. south korea -- south korea continues to offer humanitarian aid. millions of dollars to the north koreans. again, that would seem in defiance of what president trump is talking about, which is cut them off. >> jesse: would know it wouldn't.

>> juan: the president has twice baked victories -- a decision with the embargo coming out of the security council. what rex tillerson -- i think the north koreans have shown a tremendous history of powerfully evading sanctions, making them worthless. rex tillerson said today he thinks there are a few shortages taking place in north korea and he thinks they are starting to see some impact. bottom line to me is, when you get involved in the name calling, you are calling people names and they call people names -- it sounds like you're giving up the moral superior point. for a lot of people now, they are saying well, you know what? i think the president of the united states saying i'm going to totally destroy your country is going to be played over and over and over again on north korean tv. >> brian: you know in an interview, president obama said the same thing. he has tried everything.

remember about a month and a half ago, he said i respect this 45 euros. it's not easy to take over a country with all these leaders trying to kill you. and i was like are you crazy, why are you giving him that? rocket man, let me try something else. >> juan: okay. brian, house fire and fury somehow strategically deterred this man? answer: no. >> jesse: i would see all these brutal sanctions on north korea -- especially the new chinese bank action as major progress in deterring. their progress. >> dana: may be a could different effect. kim, i wanted to ask you one less thing. throughout this entire week, talking to all foreign policy, we were talking complete diplomacy. brian is right, the president is using other people on the behalf but you know who was a year?

the military. i think if there's complete coordination -- with the administration was showing this week visibly for all to see with an absolute diplomatic fight. there were no military angles. >> brian: general mattis and mcmaster used to wear uniform. >> kimberly: plane the whole document turn. they did not bring mad dog into the mix. they'd h.r. mcmaster. good point. it was strategic. >> dana: i don't know. >> kimberly: relinquished back >> dana: i don't know if it was purposeful. it was striking. if it wasn't purposeful, it was brilliant. >> kimberly: put the players out there, this is their area of expertise. your starting five to make sure. i will thought it was good. >> juan: if you say totally destroy, i think people think oh, my god.

i never heard such language from the president of the united states. totally destroy? >> jesse: we've never had a president like this. >> juan: [laughs] you've got that right. >> dana: but we've never faced a country like north korea that actually now -- >> kimberly: i don't think president trump is upset about dotard. [laughter] >> juan: it sounds a lot like -- >> dana: another one of president obama's top aides. next on "the five" -- the scandal with unmasking. ♪ my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy.

it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

♪ >> kimberly: a shocking and new fox news report on the obama administration's widening surveillance scandal involving the unmasking of trump team personnel. we are learning the former presidents ambassador to the united nations, samantha power

made hundreds of them asking right up until the inauguration. they shake out to be nearly one request per working day. this news comes after former national security advisor susan rice told investigators she unmasked senior trump officials. president obama's own former intelligence chief said his presidents are to predecessor had him wiretap. >> was the president picked up in a conversation with paul manafort kuester mexico it is certainly conceivable. i can't say. i would not want to go there but it's possible. >> kimberly: some of the more interesting news to come out of the news cycle, dana. we've been in discussion about this, talking about the role of paul manafort prior to joining the administration, during the campaign, and the scope of the investigation and perhaps indictment that could be

impending. >> dana: the unmasking question will still be a part of the mueller investigation. i talk to somebody who used to work at the nsc. a career official. i said with her ever have been any reason to unmask that many americans? he said never would it have occurred to him that someone would have done that. i feel like samantha power and the obama administration officials that allow the unmasking to happen have an obligation to explain to the american people why it was necessary and what they were doing. even though they are not in power anymore, this question needs to be answered and apparently her lawyer said she will answer it in a closed session next month with congress. when it comes to the question about the wiretapping, it's like if jesse is being wiretapped because he's got some funny business going on -- >> jesse: conceivable. >> juan: that's what i said. >> dana: you can't say i was wiretapped too.

i was picked up in a conversation with the person being wiretapped and i think there's a distinction. >> kimberly: most likely it would include -- >> brian: think about this, we are learning more and more about devon and i saw that day. he said oh, my goodness. this is unbelievable. how do i relay it? he could have done a better job or else he would still be in charge of the investigation. he says there was a request for unmasking. by somebody who doesn't have an intelligence portfolio. there is no reason samantha power should be doing that. >> jesse: or superpowers. >> brian: what did jim clapper do? he is saying i had no idea samantha power -- that thing was happening. or the susan rice thing was happening. to the director of national intelligence. he looks exhausted every time they go to him on camera.

can you imagine when he wasn't on camera? we either have to get rid of that position or give the money back for those eight years. >> juan: so unfair. in regards to james clapper. it was director. that's like saying president trump should know everything that's going on in government. >> brian: he told chuck he would know it if it happened. >> juan: he would know what? that's right -- i think it's necessary just to be straight about this. unmasking is not an unusual activity in the united states government. the intelligence agencies regularly unmask people when they have a request. if you said samantha power had no reason -- she's part of a national security council. she has an interest in studying and being aware of any threat to american security. of course the context is guess

what? there is russian interference in the 2016 election. lots of people looking at manafort. >> brian: interested after the wrong person one might. >> juan: that's it. >> brian: he won the election. >> juan: manafort -- they had various requests to the fisa back to 2014 on manafort. >> brian: they exonerated him. a request. most of them came after november. >> kimberly: the sheer volume, voluminous in nature. it's not like you missed one or two. this amounts to one for every working day. the sheer volume. >> juan: nobody saying this is illegal or accusing her for illegal activity. no one saying this is political. it's a dodge to get away from trump -- that's what got the media in trouble. >> brian: we are going to find out. >> jesse: since you need some help, juan, and for years --

u.s. ambassador john bolton made ten unmasking requests. in one year, samantha power made 210. doesn't seem normal. >> juan: but the russian interference in the 2016 election. >> jesse: i don't know anything about unmasking. then, we unmasked but we never did it for political purposes. and then you know what? we unmasked trump people. and then 200 people were unmasked during the election. that's funny. also the wiretapping story changed too. first, no wiretapping happened. then you want? maybe an apartment in trump tower was wiretapped. and it now? maybe a conversation with president trump was wiretapped. everything keeps changing. it's your analogy. >> kimberly: it might have been caught in a collection. not on target. >> jesse: according to cnn which could be fake news. >> brian: i'm going to hold my

breath until dana talks. >> kimberly: we will be here a while. >> juan: it wasn't that they were going after trump tower. they were going after manafort. >> jesse: i agree. but when trump says my wires were tapped, that's his building. >> dana: all that could be true and it will be a really fun mueller finalizes this investigation and we get all the information and we can stop speculating because we actually have no idea. >> kimberly: which is why they are getting the investigation and as the news develops and breaks, we will get it to you. >> juan: but the attorney general was saying no evidence that president obama wiretapped donald trump. >> brian: what about trey gowdy's question? did anyone wiretap anyone may be a day or two before he left? there was a vague memory of this. how do these people know to ask these questions? someone is going to tie this all together. >> jesse: comey has a lot of credibility left. >> juan: is try to make sure everybody is looking at this hand. don't pay attention to the

troubles back here, folks. >> kimberly: okay. straight ahead, the health care feud heats up between a late-night host and a senator spearheading a new effort to repeal obamacare. stay right there. ♪

>> jesse: and republican leaders are trying to nail down final votes to repeal obamacare. vice president pence said it could be the last hope. speak up we really do believe that this may well be our last best chance to stop and turn around and head america back in the direction of the kind of health care reform based on individual choice, state-based innovations and the president and i are determined to do all that we can to see this through. >> jesse: last night jimmy

kimmel double down on his attacks on one of the cosponsors of the legislation -- bill cassidy. he called senator a liar for saying on his show he would not support a plan that guarantees coverage for those with pre-existing conditions. cassidy fired back again. >> i wish jimmy would maybe hear my perspective. i apologize if i offended but i didn't intend to. for example, he said we kick everybody off the program in ten years. in washington, you have to reauthorize the program. people don't want to keep obamacare to keep putting this misinformation out. >> jesse: and looks like cassidy and kimmel are talking across each other. no one is really connecting. >> brian: that's why our approach even on the radio has been okay, this is what cassidy. said, this is what jimmy kimmel has had. no one is taking on this bill except for jimmy kimmel.

if he's telling the truth, he's right. if cassidy who wrote the program is right and has great reputation as does senator lindsey graham -- he disputes every one of them. even though they spoke on the line entirely to their cell phone phone, cassidy and kimmel don't speak. i'm sure jimmy kimmel is going to answer again and cassidy answered on a show earlier today. where are the facts in this conversation? the fact is, he had this terrible thing happened in his to my with his son. no one wants to offend jimmy kimmel but at the same time, he should go on and have cassidy on as a guest and debate it. >> juan: the facts are out there. >> brian: who is right just now? >> juan: absolutely jimmy kimmel is right. if you look at the cassidy-graham bill. what it says about pre-existing conditions is we have no requirement -- it devolves to

the state. the state has to assure it but they will have some position but given the amount of funding, there's no guarantee that in fact people with pre-existing conditions will be covered. and there is a cap with medicaid spending. there's no debate here. >> brian: there is a demand to cover pre-existing conditions with the money required the ghost of the state and it says it has to be -- >> juan: no, it says that they can describe -- >> brian: senator graham lied? >> juan: somebody's lying. at the state level, you can set the price for coverage of pre-existing conditions and obviously that can be beyond the means of people who have these conditions. that's different than obamacare. this to me is again, all about republicans saying we need a victory. we know we are getting hammered by the base for not doing it because as kimberly pointed out, got the house and the senate. why do we get rid of it?

you guys that are complaining, take this. get out of here. >> jesse: juan, you don't have a lot of legs to stand on. obamacare imploded. >> juan: 60% of american stand with me, not you, jesse. >> kimberly: not on "watters' world," they'll swim with him. >> jesse: is kimmel winning this, is cassidy winning bets? who is looking good? would you advise cassidy to look off -- back off or go on his show? >> kimberly: i want to give either one of them advice. i think healthy debate is always good. if it gets people talking about the issues and narrows down to some of the specifics and actual facts. the problem is there have been a lot of conflicting and confusing information out there. you also see there's conflict with even the republican party. five governors don't want to manage statement health care. they have an issue with that. people are very adamant and stand on principle to say they

would like to repeal the whole thing like senator rand paul. he feels it's not sufficient. when you think of it as a p.r. perspective, if they take obamacare and they start tinkering with it and doing the frankenstein thing -- they are going to own it and it's going to be very tricky. in terms of trying to make sure it's more affordable. i feel very strongly that it has to bath an expansion for the free market and make it more affordable for the single moms, truck drivers, people out there that are forced into limited choices at exorbitant rates. i do want to do better. i do think that both sides would like to see a fortuitous outcome. >> brian: right, that's what both sides want. a >> dana: if i were on the republican side in house or senate i would pull back and do a bigger picture thing. they are trying to do something different that prevents us from having to slide into medicare for all. one is correct, you approval ratings for obamacare are 60%.

the disapproval of medicare for all is much higher than that. what they are trying to do is say we need a competition for ideas. looking for different ways for different states to deal with things. i talked with senator that thinks if it has a 50/50 chance of passing and lisa murkowski in example might be getting a different deal. a very real state with a lot of native american spread out over a vast area. should alaska be able to have a different program than new york, florida, ohio? the way we are set up in the united states of america, the answer should be yes. if you think there is not rationing in a socialized medicine system, you are wrong. >> brian: go to england. >> dana: there are different systems that do some things very well. it's super expensive. we should have an honest conversation about how much we are willing to pay. it's before we are having an honest conversation on this show.

rock star bono has a few choice words for president trump.

♪ [youtube plays] >> juan: bono did not have nice things to say about president trump. i always believe in working across the aisle but there is a bully the bully pulpit and silence is not an option. he also says his band delayed their latest album because the president disrupted the "moral arc of the universe." picking up on a doctor king quote with the moral arc of the universe bending towards justice and the like. >> kimberly: he quoted dr. king and the number of his songs. when i think? personally, i like bono very much. he's done a lot of humanitarian work and efforts that i strongly

admire. regarding the president, i don't think the president has destroyed the moral arc of the universe or compromised it to where you should not leak in album. >> brian: even hillary clinton will dial it back a little. >> kimberly: the worst idea that ever happened to america -- >> brian: innocence was lost, he told charlie rose. isn't there any irish politics he could discuss? >> dana: irish politics don't matter. >> kimberly: all! >> dana: i mean, to irish politics actually matter to the world? responded to the leader of the free world -- i would say his criticism is fairly mild compared to other people in hollywood. severing off donald trump heads and posting pictures with them. >> brian: i just think that he is putting himself way out there because people want to buy

music, they don't want to talk about politics. if i were the producer of his album, i would be so mad at him. i would be so upset because the minute you call out half america like jennifer lawrence says -- she told 50% of america don't go watch my movie. >> dana: and guess what? they didn't. >> brian: why would bono do that? >> jesse: the left wants to talk to rocket man. they don't want to talk to president trump. come on, guys. >> dana: maybe nancy. >> brian: nancy talks to him and she gets bombarded by the left. ellen won't have trouble on the show because she does not want to validate him but chelsea handler says she will never talk to the first lady because she has an accent? jimmy fallon tussled president trump's hair and he got criticized for humanizing him. spicer was on the emmys and he had a chuckle with the liberals and they all said no, you can't normalize a like that. it's crazy but the reason why

this happens, these haters defined themselves by how much they hate trump. and if they talk to trump. that makes trump look not a monster. he is a human being. >> kimberly: a lot of these people -- >> jesse: he such a good negotiator. once that happens, they no longer can hate the man and they can't raise money off of him and defined themselves by who you are. >> juan: you doubt their sincerity? it's before they reach out to castro and they want to talk to the iranians. >> juan: >> juan: dana, let me o you specifically -- >> kimberly: they are going to raise the debt. >> juan: let me come to specifically about bono. he says he's upset about the return of hard right views. it is to be tolerated. he said jingoism, fervor referred trump's verbiage reminded us that we are not dreaming if we thought evolution

applied to political consciousness. it requires a lot of focus to maintain our democratic institution. >> brian: we needed that. >> juan: apparently he does not think that donald trump is for that. >> dana: let's talk about one of the issues that bono cares a lot about which is antipoverty efforts. this interview was given before the u.n. speech this week. trump, the one she had with african leaders was well received. in his speech he talked about the president's emergency plan for aids relief and the malaria initiative to programs that brought bono and george w. bush together for a good friendship. i'm not saying trump and bono are necessarily going to be friends but if they could give him a little bit of a chance and

let him get through the first year, god they might have hated the campaign rhetoric. some of us did. i don't like any of the nicknames for americans like rocket man, fine. i get that. if they can look at some of the actions -- he pushed up the money for the humanitarian aid in africa when it comes to the food aid. he's sending nikki haley to africa in order to try to work on conflict resolution. if you look at the actual actions of what he is doing -- he doesn't care about gay marriage. they might have problems with the transgender thing, but madison says he's going to take care of that. to say we are going back to the far right social issues of the 1980s is so wrong. it's demonstrably false. >> juan: this is the problem and do you know what? he doesn't deserve to be called a dotard. it's before it right, not at all. >> brian: [laughs] you cannot teach that. >> juan: dotard? >> dana: dotard. not like re-tard i come for dana's help every night. melania trump is cyber bullied herself. details, next.

♪ >> brian: right. we used to move like jagger and then that loud noise habit. an unbelievable story. melania trump finds herself mocked by her appearance online.

delivering a speech yesterday to the u.n. general assembly on the dangers of cyberbullying. is this hypocrisy or what? i'm not going to read some of the things that popped up on twitter but you would all find it offensive. looking at the address right now, i would say that it's fashion forward, kimberly. that's something i would not design. but i don't design dresses. if you watch her walk, the dress fits form perfect. behind the podium, it's a little different. >> kimberly: is not about the dress, it's about the principle. if this was michelle obama who i think just beautifully, no one would be making any comment. a couple months ago we were reveling and saying how well melania trump looked and how well she represented the country on the president's first overseas visit and then all of a sudden, the honeymoon is over. the comments are on her shoes.

she had heels on when she should have had sneakers and now they are not embracing that outfit. you can't please people in the irony of it -- it's supposed to be about cyberbullying in people taking to the internet and cyberbullying. >> brian: she's one of the most beautiful women you will ever see in your life. how could you possibly even comment on anything like that? $3,000, this dress cost. >> dana: i remember when stella obama for very expensive dress of -- went michelle obama wore very expensive dresses. she got a pass and she should. first ladies really should. the trump's don't hide their wealth. she is a fashion model. someone who is 5 feet tall and could never wear that dress, i really admire her. >> brian: jesse, you really don't hide your wealth either. >> jesse: yeah, i flaunt it. i will say i think bullying is a little bit strong. i don't think people that write

a comment on twitter about someone's dress is bullying. bullying the first lady. i don't think trump retreating a funny video is bullying either. >> brian: it was just a logo, not a person. juan, do you feel different down jesse? >> juan: if jesse was in the dress, i would not believe him. [laughter] >> dana: i went. >> juan: i will leave you alone. i'm going to explain it. we get along on this lgbtq whatever thing. if you're going to dress like that, that's your thing. i'm going to stay out of your business. [laughter] >> brian: i thought it was a great dress. >> juan: are you kidding me? let's be nice. she is gorgeous and kimberly tells me she's a wonderful person. that was a strange looking dress. you didn't think that was unusual? >> jesse: didn't want just say that is a strange looking dress? >> juan: that's not the point.

her husband believes people and she is -- >> kimberly: the content of her speech. >> brian: "one more thing" is

♪ >> dana: time now for "one more thing." k.g. >> kimberly: sweet story that will tug at your heartstrings. all the damage and devastation from hurricane irma -- when the rescuers were going in, they got

startled when a tiny sea bear jumped out and they saw the deer was not in good shape. it was very thirsty. there hadn't been freshwater. he drank four bottles of water. poor little guy. i think. >> dana: is not a guy? >> kimberly: it was very sweet. we loved this video. >> dana: jesse, can you top that? >> jesse: definitely. the marine corps is going to have the first female infantry officer ever. do know how they go through this ridiculously tough course? three week combat exercise. a bunch of women have already tried it and none of them made it until one woman succeeded in finishing this thing. she's now expected to lead up to the moon about 40 infantry marines. and it an area that really has an integrated. congratulations to her. they don't have her name out there yet. for security purposes.

this is the hardest course to do ever. she did it. congratulations. >> dana: and we can't even name her. i'm sure she watches "the five." i have the most epic "one more thing" ever despite what brian is going to tell you. as you know, i have some favorite things in the world. one is george w. bush in the other is george bentley. last night, they met in missouri. brian got cut out of the picture but we don't care about him. i like him and all but this was one of my world collided. he told the president that i am his biggest fan in the president said well he is my biggest fan? all my favorite guys together. >> jesse: where am i? >> dana: you are on probation. best "one more thing" ever. juan. >> juan: jake lamotta died this week at 95. his story came to life in the

movie "raging bull" jake lamotta was played by robert de niro. take a look. >> jake lamotta comes out of the ring once again. to the left. he was down for the second time. >> juan: my dad was a boxing trainer and among the fight crowd, i heard he was considered not quite a boxing craftsman but from his low crouch, no one ever fought with the kind of storming passion that he managed. he got a record of 83 wins. wow. only 19 losses. 30 wins by knockout. jake, your life was a knockout. >> dana: and he lost two sons in his life. >> brian: they played all his fights on espn2 and you realize how great his boxing was. nonstop punching. the shape they were in was phenomenal. get ready for this. if you have a best friend and you are growing up in england or

europe or america, you will be forced to leave the best friend because that's friends are not allowed in private schools because teachers and schoolmasters say they want to be a student body of inclusion. they are looking to prevent anyone from excluding you. they are going to stop kids from having a best friend. they will not let you repeat the grade with the same people. they are making you spread out. if you have a birthday party and don't invite the whole class you cannot have the birthday party. it's happening. best friends are not allowed. if you see your child very close to your neighbor, do the right thing and get them away from each other. >> kimberly: now you have to invite everyone in the class if you have a party. school rules. i always did that anyway. growing up myself. i did want to exclude anybody. i understand. >> jesse: who is was better? dana's or brian's? >> brian: i'm going to give it

to dana. >> dana: if you put those four people in one photograph? three people and a dog. at this my last show but i will be back on monday at 5:00. never miss an episode of "hanni >> bret: tightening the screws on north korea, increasing pressure over obamacare and the high-pressure sales tactics for all those abandoned used cars after hurricane harvey. this is "special report" ." good evening. welcome to washington. i am bret baier. this is our number two of our extended "special report" all this week. china and the u.s. are double teaming north korea, hitting kim jong un in the wallet over his continued nuclear defiance. president trump is widening sanctions, north korea's banker china is buckling to u.s. pressure and curtailing