incoming president's worldview. we will be there alive when president trump visits the memorial this hour tomorrow, during the ceremony for those heroes lost. we are grateful you spent the evening with us. good night. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." it is the deadliest one-man massacre in american history, yet already, among the most forgotten. it's been just a month since stephen paddock killed 58 people in las vegas. for weeks we have been asking basic questions about whate happened, most of which remain unanswered tonight. what was his motive for the shooting? howf did authorities possibly allow his house to be burgled? why was paddock's computer hard drive missing and why did it take so long for us to learn it was missing? why did security guard jesus compost travel to mexico just days after the shooting, despite being a key witness and why did authorities refuse to talk about that?

why have campos' subsequent appearances been so managed by his employer, mgm. what is the timeline of the shooting? why is it so hard to get a straight answer? these long-standing questions, we can add a few more of them tonight. why did we only learned today from the clark county sheriff that paddock's girlfriend could be withholding the important information in this case? if, in fact, she knows more than what she is saying, why is not she being interviewed right now? we also discovered that a police officer excellently fired his gun in his paddock's hotels suite iner the night of the shooting. how did that happen? guns don't often accidentally discharged. they are accidentally fired. what were the circumstances this firing? we are not trying to push a wild conspiracy theory. it's possible that the trilateral commission was involved with the more likely and in fact far more terrifying explanation is incompetence. the people running this case don't really know what they are

doing. you hate to conclude something like that but it's becoming hard not to, especially when you consider the las vegas case in its larger context. this is not the only federal investigation that has shaken public confidence recently, consider some of the others. the fbi had omar matina under surveillance for ten months and yet, somehow did not hinder his planning or execution of the pulse nightclub massacre. the fbi was also apparently aware of the new york city killer sayfullo saipov. the fort hood shooter, boston bomber, and a list of other killers, but failed his top any of their attacks. how come? the fbi famously investigated hillary clinton's email server for more than a year, during which time, for some reason, the bureau gave immunity to several top aides were no obvious reason and failed to tape-record key interviews. why is that? speaking of emails, the fbi never examined the dnc's email server after it was supposedly hacked. in fact, they accepted the claim

of a private contractor employed by the democratic party that the hacking was the work of the russian government. why didn't one of the bureau's many tech teams conduct its own investigation of the matter of this important and politically sensitive? meanwhile, in case after case, the fbi supposedly's and can white collar division has leaked details to the press. how does that restore public confidence in federal law enforcement? it doesn't and it shouldn't, of course. we have a right to be worried about the fbi. there is no more powerful federal agency in this country. they can read your email, they can root for your bank records, they can break down the. front door of your house, and arrest r children. lying to them is a federal crime. we need to be absolutely certain that the fbi is worthy of the power we give them. what is happening in las vegas right now is one of many reasons to wonder if they are. a lawyer representing several of the victims of the vegas attack joins us tonight.

craig, thanks for coming on. you are one of the few people who has been to the scene of the crime. did anything useful come out of that? did you learn anything? >> yes, sir. several things. number one, we know that the fbi has taken all the bullet marks and bullet holes and all the bullets. the other thing that is interesting, all of our clients are telling us that on the night of the shooting, there was nowhere togh go. come on. we can see that there are exits in the o plans, and the maps, ad when you are actually there, you can see that most of the exits were w blocked, many of the exis were behind fences, and there were only chirico places in which to escape. that is very concerning, especially when people got hit and killed 10 minutes after the shooting started. >> tucker: is there any indication, or have you received any, seen any evidence that the fbi had knowledge of stephen paddock? anything about him before this happen? >> not yet.

we don't have anything released from the fbi or the law enforcement agencies about him. >> tucker: lies that? >> i don't know. i do think that after 30 days, we ought to be having more information than we have right now. for example, we know bits and pieces. we know that he arrived with ten bags. we know that two bellmen help to carry them up and then we found out that there was ten bags had guns of men, 5,000 rounds of ammunition. we know that mgm claims to have, and "if you cease and the, say something" policy, and you are telling us that no oneness all those guns over a five day. not? no made, no housekeeping, no food service, every sunday for guns? no one saw him setting up security cameras? these are all things that need to be answered. i know you have asked the same question as to where we. >> tucker: some of them -- i had not asked some of those.

how did he get access to the service elevator? >> we don't know. we have our two separate things. one, he asked to use it so he left them, and two, since he was a fee down like, he was allowed to have access to the service elevator. either way, it's concerning. more concerning, how did the bellmance hall up ten bags with long, heavy rifles in them, 5,000 rounds of ammunition, they had this corporate watch center where they allegedly teach their people, if you see something, say something, and no one says anything? and if they did come up what happened to that information? i think the 27 high-powered rifles, that ought to pique somebody's interest. that is the questions we want answered. >> tucker: have you been able to speak to jesus campos? >> no. neither have you. no.ucker:

it is our impression from watching that mgm has kept pretty tight management of the things that he says in public. why would you think that would be the case? >> maybe they are concerned about he's going to say. maybee they are concerned that he's not going to stick with the mgm story. but eventually, he will be examined under oath by attorneys in these cases. it is going to be important to know the timeline, from what he says and from what the other two, now we know there were two other police officers on the floor with.we him. those are all questions that have to be answered. they eventually will. >> tucker: wait -- i'm sorry. police officers are mgm security guards? >> as of yesterday, it was the two -- we knew about campos, but they were two other police officers from the mgm that were

on the floor prior to the shooting. that is part of the ever-changing timeline. >> tucker: just to be clear, not las vegas police department, but mgm employees acting as security? >> no. as they report yesterday, there were two off duty officers -- >> tucker: off duty. okay. >> they responded to campos prior to the shooting beginning. >> tucker: huh. this is getting more confusing by the day. craig, thank you. a former nypd officer and secret service agent and a former marine special officers mission and a ceo of the security consultants and training join us. kelly, you have seen a lot of shootings in your long and varied life. what jumps out at you as you look at the facts? >> how many years has it been since oswald supposedly shot kennedy? >> tucker: good point. >> anytime bullets start flying, the fog of war figures and, it

will be confusing. there are some things that jump out. the conspiracy theorists are doing their work, and wondering why. one of the first things that jumps out at me is paddock pulled out these weapons, you just heard the attorney say, how did he get them up there? how many times do golf clubs go inside thats hotel? and those paid employees that are there or at the bottom of the pay scale. do you think that they are risking their job to bring suspicion against what was supposedly a whale, guy making a lot of money? there is a human element here that has to be accounted for also. it's not black and white. good that i have made repeated runs upstairs with a bell card l make it? of course. what seems obvious sometimes isn't. there has been talk about security cameras, that they were not present.r were they not present because they were never installed? or were they removed? why were they removed? he could not have removed them because obviously, security personnel, if they saw him doing

it, it would have been an issue. that's an issue. i would think that they probably were never installed or would be repaired. >> tucker: dan, you worked for both the nypd and a federal agency, the secret service, is it obvious to you watching who's in charge of this investigation and biass in their a central narrative coming out? why is isn't one person speakig for the whole investigation? >> based on who's controlling the evidence, the fbi, it seems to be that the bureau is directing this. i like how you opened. i think you made a reallyin salient point that deserves repeating. we are at a time in american history of our confidence in our federal law enforcement, whether it is the collection of metadata, the politicizing of our fbi, this is not the time to keep a lid on one of the largest mass murderers in american history. if you have information, gosh,

you got to get it out there, tucker. how is it -- think about it -- we had this absolutely horrifying tragedy in new york. we have already got the motive, we have the suspect, and we have a general idea from 30,000 feet above what happened. how is it that we still have no idea about with the motivators or, if they do, they at least haven't told the american people to put them at ease? we were the victims, the the american people. >> tucker: i agree completely. kelly, we learned that a firearm was discharged accidentally somehow in the hotel room. i think the police described it as an accidental discharge. you firearms accidentally discharged? >> the term for firearm trainers is negligent wow negligent discharge. it takes big stones to go into a room where someone had been firing a rifle. the normal active shooter responses to go to the crisis point where there was an explosive breach when theyy went in, i don't know if that had toy be in place, if that figures into the timeline, but it might

have happened on a reupholstering. certainly, there was not any furtive motion that the officer could have alerted on. people make mistakes. it is easy to be critical afterwards. >> tucker: for sure. this is the whole question. why wouldn't you have conspiracy theories around an investigation where there is no clear source of information? gentlemen, thank you very much. police are still probing the deadly attack tuesday night in manhattan where sayfullo saipov murdered eight people. geraldo rivera joins us with the latest on that. geraldo, good to see you. what did we know? >> tucker, if i may comment briefly on vegas, i think that if -- two big lawsuits were filed last night by consortium led by the "los angeles times." they were all suing for body cams, searchod warrants, they ae as impatient as you have been leading this charge to find out

what happened. if i may, briefly, i think that the person or the entity with the biggest motive to fudge with the timeline would be mgm, the mandalay bay. why? if indeed to 6 minutes passed between campos being shot and paddock opening fire on the crown, that is an intolerable length of time before 911 was called. the smaller the time, the less the negligent liability of the hotel would be. if paddock shot campos and opened fired on the crowd, very little negligence to the mgm or -- over difficult to prove. if the timee is 6 minutes, my god, how could they not call in 6 minutes? mgm has motive to shorten that timeline. >> tucker: lawyer should not be control of any of the information coming out of this case. it's appalling that lawyers have

thisch much influence. >> believe me, they have the best lawyers in the country. their job is to minimize the tort liability, the civil liability, and the hundreds of millions of dollars, when you think 58 dead people, scores injured, every one of them has either a wrongful death or infliction of emotional or physical wounds. it's an enormous liability if they are found indeed negligent. in terms of new york and what happened with the mowing down of these poor people, eight people, five of them from argentina, you know, the big question is why didn't we have a red flag about this sky in the mosque in paterson, new jersey. my first assignment when i came to work at fox news was to go to new jersey in the wake of 9/11, go to the mosques, including those in paterson, and find out why the response of the muslim

community was estimated as it was. why weren't they as outraged as -- allegedly -- as the rest of the american community? that was my first assignment 16 years ago and we are back there again. why didn't we know what this guy was planning? what about his family? he lived next door to the mosque in paterson. why don't we know more about the buildup? is it conceivable that people did not know or should not have known what he was planning? this guy is toast. he's not going to guantanamo bay, he will be tried, convicted in the southern district of new york, lower manhattan, an hour away from his hideous climes, and he's goingl over to get the death penalty. >> tucker: geraldo rivera, thank you. republicans dropped their tax plan today. you'll notice we did not plead with it. there is a reason for that. it is unclear exactly what some of it means. there is a ton of propaganda out there about the tax plan but

it's too important of a story to jump in without having theit facts. we are going to california this weekend and talking to the treasury secretary steve mnuchin and we'll bring you what we find. we'll get to the bottom of it if we can. meanwhile, ed henry will tell us what exactly we know and what it might mean for you. also, a key democratic talking point on uranium one just fell apart completely. we'll tell you what happened coming up. for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. theseare heading back home.y oil thanks to dawn, rescue workers only trust dawn, because it's tough on grease yet gentle. i am home, i am home, i am home when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night. hold on dad...

liberty did what? yeah, liberty mutual 24-hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. my dad says our insurance doesn't have that. don't worry - i know what a lug wrench is, dad. is this a lug wrench? maybe? you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. you're searching for something. whoooo. like the perfect deal...

...on the perfect hotel. so wouldn't it be perfect if... ....there was a single site... ...where you could find the... ...right hotel for you at the best price? there is. because tripadvisor now compares... ...prices from over 200 booking... ...sites ...to save you up to 30%... ...on the hotel you want. trust this bird's words. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices.

♪ >> tucker: for years, you've heard the uranium one deal be defended on the grounds that

even if it gave russia control over a huge swath over u.s. uranium deposits -- no big deal -- or did not allow that uranium to be exported from this country. democratsm insist on not repeatedly, including many times on the show. >> uranium does not leave the united states without getting an export license -- >> tucker: false. false. false. they have no export license. that is the whole point. >> with respect to the export of uranium, i haven't heard anyone say that it made it to anywhere improper. >> russia can't export this uranium outside of the united states. it's not like they can do whatever they want withs it. >> tucker: actually, they can and they did. new reporting by "the hill" reveals what we have been saying for a while, the nuclear regulatory commission under the obama administration approved the export of the uranium with some of the traveling from this country to canada to europe and from there, your guess is as good as ours. this congressman represents new york and he joins us.

congressman, if you are concerned about russian interference in the business of the united states, and you think thatth they are a rifle, maybe n enemy with which we are at war, as some of your colleagues have said, you've got to be concerned that a russian company has exported the american you uranium without a license withot our borders. >> there is a report into that. we have to look into that. >> tucker: it's been confirmed by "the new york times" a couple of years ago and today by "the hill." no one involved and i said. >> we should look into it. >> tucker: here is what we know. in 2012, the nuclear regulatory commission authorized an amendment to export license for a trucking firm that moved this yellowcake uranium, which can be used for a bunch of different purposes, good and bad, to leave the country. are you concerned about that? >> of course i'm concerned. we should look into it. m >> tucker: by look into it --

why wouldn't you have a criminal probe? why would you allow our main geopolitical rival to move uranium off the continent? >> i don't think that is what thera "the hill" story said. >> tucker: that is exactly what they said. >> some may have gone to europe and i think you said we don't know where it went and that's fair. let's find out. i'm concerned. i'm not sure what your point is. >> tucker: my point is that you are not concerned. it is obvious how unconcerned you are. here -- i may be made the mistake -- >> excuse me. excuse me. i just that i am concerned. >> tucker: you are not concerned. if you were concerned, you would have known about the story along time ago, as i did, as anyone who cares about this did, if you were really as worried about russian interference as you have said repeatedly that you are, then why wouldn't you be honest with both feet trying to determine who allowed this and why and where the locate is? >> i'm sorry that you are upset that i'm agreeing with you that

we should look into it. i don't know that we can walk into it and chew gum at the same time. we have had admissions of guilt of money laundering and foreign law bring by governments and government officials, i'm not sure it is the only thing we should look at. >> tucker: here's something you could do tonight. that is demand that your colleagues make public they are meetings with foreign lobbyists. there is no requirement to do that. it is not clear why. >> i will do you one better. i would be on it. i don't think there should be foreign law bring by governments and members of congress. they should be illegal. people should not be paid money to lobby members of congress. that is what we have a state department for. members of congress want tore talk to government officials, that is fine, they should. but we should not have obvious getting paid for that, let's ban it. >> tucker: let me emphatically agree with you and ask a follow-up question, which is, now that we know that russian

backed ukrainian interests paid paul manafort a lot of money, he distributed to a couple of lobbying firms, one a republican firm, the other -- the top democratic firm in town in washington, to go up and lobby members. we know they met with the chairman of the senate foreign relations committee, senator menendez of new jersey. we can't get a straight answer of how many meetings and with whom he had. why can't we? >> you should ask him not. i don't do his scheduling. >> tucker: have you met with any lobbyists representing foreign interests since you have been in congress? >> no. >> tucker: your colleagues have and i wonder why i don't have a right to know who they met with. >> you should and i would ban it. i think you and i agree. >> tucker: we don't fully agree. i agree with you on the planning -- god bless you -- because there is a story about russian interference in our government, things that have happened for years, now that we know these tales in this indictment of paul manafort, why shouldn't we be able to get to the bottom of it? congress has exempted itself. >> i'm glad you brought up the

manafort indictment. the fact is, i am for the third or fourth time, agreeing with you. not only should members disclose the pouring lobbyists -- >> tucker: how can we getme them to do that? >> i would ban it. >> tucker: that is -- look. you know it will not be a band. let's start with the first up, let's callo upon the democratic leaders to demand that all democrats under the leadership release a comprehensive least on the meetings theyad had with foreign lobbyists. >> i'm sure you would want the republicans to do that, too. >> tucker: of course. >> it wasn't in your question. >> tucker: they were republicans involved in this. >> somehow only democrats made your -- >> tucker: you're a democrat and one with sway. >> and i am one that is here agreeing with you. that seems to trouble you in some way. but i don't know how to do it anymore emphatically. >> tucker: are you? >> i believe i wouldn't be on your book does position >> tucker: would you sponsor legislation requiring members of congress to disclose the

meetings with foreign lobbyists? >> if it makes you happy. you bet, let's do it. how about we talk about the indictmentst' i got handed down this week involving the president's campaign manager and his foreign policy advisor. can we do that, too? i know we filled a week of airtime -- >> tucker: this is hilarious. [laughs] >> that's how we described him to "the washington post." i got that from the president. >> tucker: i think the manafort thing -- in case you were asking my opinion -- is a serious thing. >> he's under indictment. o >> tucker: absolutely. papadopoulos, you will not get me to take that seriously. they could not get real foreign policy advisors so they held a 29-year-old who had been in the model you want to pretend to be one. now he turns out to be anan idi. that is bad judgment putting him on the advisor list but you can convince me that is real. >> i'd be careful about that. excuse me, if you hang your hat on how senior he was, you might just a consider for moment that the same actions he

was engaged in and lied about the federal agents is very similar to the actions that were engaged in by now under indictment paul manafort, donald trump jr., and jared kushner. excuse me, where they met with russian lawyers for the same purpose, which was to access -- >> tucker: he's idiotic. there is no connection. >> what is idiotic? it's not in dispute. thee president's son and his son-in-law and manafort, we know about manafort, met with russian lawyers, who were there, expressly -- >> tucker: letsi me return -- you are glib and totally insecure.. "let's look into that." [laughs] >> it's funny. i'm glad to hear you say that. >> tucker: that's hilarious. it's because you have and making fun of this investigation for a year and now we are taking it seriously? >> tucker: i am taking the part that might have included national security. >> we should let bob mueller do his work. >> tucker: ir agree. i am being told i have to go. we have gone over.

i agree with you on that. nice to see you. >> good to be in agreement. >> tucker: hillary clinton just got back scabbed by a top democrat who admitted her party. the 2016 primary on hillary's behalf. that is next. ♪ the coffee here is amazing. because the volcanic soil is amazing. so we give farmers like win more plants. to grow more delicious coffee. which helps provide for win's family. all, for a smoother tasting cup of coffee. green mountain coffee roasters. ...has grown into an enterprise. that's why i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. now, i'm earning unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase i make. everything. what's in your wallet?

that's why feeling safe is priceless. with adt, you can feel safe with an adt starter kit professionally installed for only $49.00. call today, and install an adt starter kit that includes security panel,

keypad, key fob, entry and motion sensors and for a limited time, get a camera included and installed at no additional cost. that's a $449.00 value, installed, for just $49.00. adt has over 140 years of security experience, with our commitment to customer service, and round-the- clock professional monitoring, you have the comfort of knowing that adt is helping to protect what matters most. call today, or visit adt.com to get your adt starter kit installed for just $49.00. adt. we help keep you safe, so you can feel secure. call 1-888-337-safe or visit adt.com and get your adt starter kit for just $49.00. >> tucker: it wasn't that long ago, in fact, just last year, donna brazile was auc beautiful soldier for the democratic party, she ran it. now, after that party's election defeat, she is sticking a knife and hillary clinton.

a piece in "politico" today, she describes how clinton entered into a secret tape over -- takeover of the dnc. it was effectively funded by the dnc, even though it was supposed to preside neutrally, that he dnc was come over the democratic primary race. a staffer for the bernie campaign suspected something like this was going on, and now she knows for sure, and we couldn't resist getting her opinion. i remember that you said that you believed something like this was a foot. how do you feel now that you know you were right? >> you better believe what we said a year ago, repeatedly, over and over and over, folks just like to pretend that we were asking them to believe in santa claus, as if we were delusional when we said over and that the system was rigged and faces again, it's important to remember, tucker, i worked on a national campaign, traveled all over the country for several years, i was not sitting on twitter being a twitter warrior facebook bandit.

we were seeing these in the field, we knew them to be true. now that the chickens have finally come home to roost, like we are seeing around here in houston, it looks like she has earned history and its of them and no other candidate has done. not only did they give her -- she gave the dnc the money to buy the cookies,he she bake the cookies, eat the cookies in the cookie jar, and it's pretty clear who had control of the country. we are all sitting around saying, "i told you so. >> tucker: is a lifelong democrat, how does it make you feel that yourel party, accordig to donna brazile, raked a primary election? >> it made me feel the same way that i didid when i joined the campaign. you when i have talked before previously. i went to the independent side because i joined the bernie sanders campaign not because i'm a socialist, because i'm not, i joined because they wanted someone to speak up against the establishment. it feels the same way he did in 2008 and 2012 and 2010 and now we have the evidence to finally

show what we have been talking about this entire time. >> tucker: kind of obvious in retrospect. did you really think in a free and fair, open primary, of all the potential democratic candidates, hillary clinton, who lost in 2008 the same scenario, would have been chosen as the nominee? >>e you know, i think that the way it was set up with bernie sanders not having the name recognition, that hurt him in some respects. but to look at people who did not even know who bernie was to now be, according to some polls, one of the most popular politicians in america, a lot of ground could have been made. tucker, particularly in the south, i was a national racial justice director, we went to local communities that would not give us the time of day, not even an appointment to share our platform. i can't say what it would've been whether he would have won the nomination or won the president, what i do know is that he did not receive a fair shot, just like the people whoeo ran on the state level did notei receive a fair shot. all the money was pulled to the

hillary clinton campaign in addition to obama's campaign. donna brazile was very clear. why was donna brazile, a 30-year veteran again, turning on her establishment friends? ii am looking to see more of those coming out of the scandal. >> tucker: she is coming on the show next week and she will tell us. terzlyn figaro, thank you for coming on. >> think you praise be with republicans in congress have unveiled their plan to overhaul the u.s. tax code. is complex. thankfully, we have ed henry to explain it. >> tucker, it will be a big, beautiful tax cut. that is what we can report. >> tucker: okay. >> in all seriousness, the details finally today. $1.5 trillion tax cut. they c will shrink down a seven tax rates down to three. 12%, 25%, 35%. they will keep the rich at 39.6%. what is interesting, they will cut the corporate tax rate down from 35% to 20%. democrats are jumping on this by saying come out of the

$1.5 trillion in tax cuts, one drilling will go to businesses. the republican philosophy, conservative say that will end up healthy, create jobs, mean increased wages, democrats are jumping on it and say, no, it'ss unfair to the middle class, and they are going further -- you've heard this talking point on twitter, one cable show after another -- it's a scam and democrats have been charging in recent weeks, this will be a tax increase for the middle class. today, "the washington post" obliterated that talking point. they did a fact-check and gave it four pinocchios. here's what they set about hearticle. they said in their haste to condemn the g.o.p. tax plan, democrats have spread far and wide the false claim that families making less than $86,000 on average will face a hefty tax hike. actually, it is the opposite. most families in that income range would get a tax cut. in fact, we have run the numbers, about 97 million families will end up getting a tax cut.

that talking point, saying of the middle-class is getting a tax increase, is completely false. that gives the president a boost. however, he has a very narrow margin in the house. very few votes to spare to get this passed. as you know, even more of an uphill climb in the senate because they cannot repeal and replace obamacare. you will have people like rand paul and john mccain talking a by the the deficit. bob corker. this is far from reality. this talking point that is going to hurt the middle class, really took a post today. >> tucker: a code to change completely in the senate. that is why we are speaking to steve mnuchin. good to see you. our text -- our tech companies censoring politically conservative views? they are and we are talking tome someone who is experiencing it firsthand. stay tuned.

i love kiwis. i've always had that issue with the seeds getting under my denture. super poligrip free. it creates a seal of the dentures in my mouth. just a few dabs is clinically proven to seal out more food particles. try super poligrip free. ♪

is america's number-one you kmotorcycle insurer. yeah, she does purr! best bike i ever owned! no, you're never alone, because our claims reps are available 24/7. we even cover accessories and custom parts. we diget an early start! took the kids to soccer practice. you want me to jump that cactus? all right. aah! that lady's awesome. i don't see a possum! ♪ >> tucker: a handful of tech companies increasingly dominate the daily lives of americans.

what could go wrong? whether you are shopping, socializing, working, or learning, odds are you will be spending an awful lot of time using amazon, facebook, google, and a couple of others. can we count on the goodwill of these companies? a rhetorical question. the operator of prager university has recently sued google and its subsidiary, youtube, he says they deliberately restricted his videos so they have less reach and are ineligible for ad revenue. he joins us tonight. that is a heavy duty charge. clearly, i don't think he would have filed a lawsuit without evidence to support it. tell us what you know why they did this to you. >> they have placed on the restricted list, that means it can't be viewed in libraries and schools or any place that filters out pornography, cannot be seen in any of those places, our videos are as innocent as exists on the internet.

four pulitzer prize winners, professors from stanford, mit, harvard, yale, it is about as normative and conservative, but we don't only have conservative conservatives. alan dershowitz have given a number of videos. his video was placed on on the restricted list, as well. when you understand which ones, for example, -- for example, i gave a video, and i only get 15% of the 260 or so videos that are there. they are all 5 minutes long, we have 500 million views this year, so it's rather large. a big deal, this suit. i have a video, for example, on the ten commandments. i have one five-minute video program management. the one that i have on "thou shall not murder" -- how is that -- that is on the restricted list. we have a video, "america must lead, so do liberals have a video, "america must lead," but ours, i believe it was given by bret stephens, not a flaming

conservative, ethernet was placed on the restricted list. it is all entirely due to our content and being conservative. they need to be called on this. >> tucker: that is for sure. what do you have said, and i believe you because i know you and i know that you are a religious and moral man, and you are smart, so you bring this argument to them, to google and its subsidiary, youtube, and you say why are you doing this to me, what was their response? >> inappropriate for children. [laughs] >> tucker: do they give example? >> there is no answer. no, that is at. they have a stock phrase. we actually finally got it from a human, not from some automatic response. they still said, "inappropriate." we don't understand why. we have a victor davis hanson, whom i'm sure you know, he is a wonderful, wonderful human being. he gives a five minute course on the history of the korean war.

if america looks good, it's censored -- censored as an appropriate word. it's restricted. is if israel looks good, it's restricted. it's almost as if -- predictable what they would restrict. the point is this. they should say, look, we are liberal or left-wing organizations, we don't want to give a forum for others, and then i have no issue. but they say -- >> tucker: may hold so much power. >> that is not honest. >> tucker: denis, please tell us what happens. thank you. >> i will. >> tucker: up next, clash of the cable hosts. bret baier versus shannon bream. "final exam" just around the corner. ♪

it helps replenish nutrients your eyes can lose as you age. nourish your eyes to help keep them healthy. ocuvite. be good to your eyes. but on the inside, i feel chronic, widespread pain.like most people.

fibromyalgia may be invisible to others, but my pain is real. fibromyalgia is thought to be caused by overactive nerves. lyrica is believed to calm these nerves. i'm glad my doctor prescribed lyrica. for some, lyrica delivers effective relief for moderate to even severe fibromyalgia pain. and improves function. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions, suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worse depression, unusual changes in mood or behavior, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects: dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain, swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who've had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. with less pain, i can do more with my family. talk to your doctor today. see if lyrica can help.

♪ >> tucker: only thursday but ari did a highlight of the week. time for "final exam" where receipt which famous news personality has been paying attention to the news. tonight, we picked the forces of day against the forces of night. shannon bream hosts the brand-new "fox news @ night" at 11:00 p.m. eastern. bret baier hosts "special report" every day at 6:00. they join us in studio. the first time ever shannon bream has been described the force of darkness. [laughter] >> not a title -- i try to use my powers for good. >> tucker: you are one of the rare people who doesn't. here are the rules. put your hands on the buzzer, i will ask questions. the first one to buzz in gets to answer the question. each correct answer award see one point. each incorrect answer, like the s.a.t., detracts the point. best-of-five wins. >> shannon already has a w. >> tucker: can i take the

temperature of the room? are you feeling good? >> i'm nervous. >> i don't know what is coming. >> tucker: don't be nervous. everything depends on this. question one, "forbes" magazine just released its list of the world's most powerful woman, which is 63-year-old former bartender takes top spot? >> 63-year-old former bartender... >> tucker: former bartender. he won bret baier, ladies and gentlemen. >> sheryl sandberg. >> tucker: sheryl sandberg! issue 63 and a former bartender? to the tape we go. >> u.k. prime minister theresa may as the woman's second most powerful woman -- the world's most powerful women. angela merkel taking number one. >> tucker: if she doesn't email you after this -- [laughter] >> there goes my facebook my facebook. >> tucker: [laughs] question two. on sunday night, a former u.s. president drew up the first

pitch the world series gameid in houston, texas. he was at? shannon bream. >> bush 43. as distinct from 41. here we go. >> tucker: 43 taking the field in houston, where he is greeteds father, former president hw bush, who gave him the ball. such an amazing sight, took up residence on the same diamond and then president bush winding up and throwing a strike, of course. >> have you tested these lights? [laughter] has there been a qualifying -- >> i have good reflexes. >> tucker: this game is fundamentally theological. it tells you whose side god is on. a big name nfl sponsor is blasting the national football league over the handling of the protests. a company ceo says that his sales are way down due to the league not punishing players who kneel. which company is at? bret baier. >> papa john's. >> tucker: papa john's people,

says bret baier. >> the nfl protests may have had a strange side effect. according to the papa john's ceo, it is hurting sales. >> tucker: papa john's! maybe it will go domino's. [laughter] >> the garlic dipping sauce. have you had that with the papa john's pizza? >> tucker: yeah, i have had it. question four. on her current book tours, hillary clinton was asked which halloween costume she would be. what was her answer? >> oh. >> tucker: hillary clinton, ran for president very recently. >> herbert dewar has been 11 years? >> tucker: it's been 11 years a long. >> what was her halloween costume, shannon? >> tucker: what would she go as? oh, bret baier. >> wonder woman? >> tucker: wonder woman is bret baier's answer. what did hillary say? >> what are you going to be for

halloween? [laughter] >> i will may become as the president. [cheers and applause] >> with hillary, the sad answer is always the right answer. >> you go to the negative one. [laughter] >> tucker: we are back to the theological underpinning. >> strategicni arising. >> tucker: don't question. everything hangs on this. don't feel pressure. the french, people in france, are in crisis mode. they are forced to cut back on their croissant intake. it turns out that country is a s a major shortage of which ingredient? bret baier. >> to go to zero, flower! >> tucker: flour! just to sort of described the stakes, i think you are negativ. you could be a negative two, or you could be at zero. a lot hangs on this. is the answer flour? >> there is a shortage of butte

butter. poor weather, not i enough catte feed. did you know france is the number one consumer of butter on the planet? 18 pounds of it consumed per person in france every year. >> its own so much more official when stewart says it. >> tucker: 18 pounds per person per year. why are they so thin? >> they walk everywhere. >> tucker: atkins is real. >> tucker: shannon bream, second week in a row, that is it. you winan again. >> brian kilmeade went down? >> here's the thing. the groove calling championship every year, you do it three times in a row and you are out. you are eliminated. i take out one more person -- >> tucker: you are the all-time champion. the moral champion. thank you, both. that is it for this week's final "final exam." pay attention to the news next week. you can play along next thursday. we'll be right d back.

this guy isn't sure he can take it anymore. unwavering self-confidence. stuck in a 4-door sedan of sadness. upgrade your commute. ride with audible. dial star star audible on your smartphone to start listening today. whoooo.

i enjoy the fresher things in life. fresh towels.

fresh soaps. and of course, tripadvisor's freshest, lowest... ...prices. so if you're anything like me... ...you'll want to check tripadvisor. we now instantly compare prices... ...from over 200 booking sites... ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. go on, try something fresh. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. is now a good time to refinance? yes! mortgage rates are historically low. the time to refinance your home is right now. get started at lendingtree.com. the only place you can compare up to five real offers, side by side, for free. our average customer can significantly lower their monthly bills. quick. beat the fed's next rate hike. do not miss this window. are you sure you have the best rate? it only takes 3 minutes to find out. go to lendingtree.com right now. >> tucker: a minute ago, twitter

admitted that employee today deleted the president's twitter account, accidentally. the page is back, and we will be too tomorrow on the west coast, handing it over now to sean hannity. >> sean: thank you, tucker. stunning revelation today. fox news alert. we are following major making new stories tonight. a smoking gun story. hillary clinton, she rigged the primary election against bernie sanders. she stole it from him. president trump was right all along.y hillary clinton is now defending this discredited dossier. whatat happened last year's campaign, all the details and alsoak breaking tonightjo exclusively here on "hannity," a shocking report of the uranium one scandal. nuclear fuel would leave the united states. guess what? shows that american