lying, smugness and group think. dvri if you can figure out how to make that machine work. good night from washington. sean happy any is up next. >> heather: welcome to hannity tonight. the hill's john solomon is out with a smoking gun report that the fbi informant we've been telling you about has the evidence that show as russian effort to get the corrupt un rarium 1 deal approved by the obama administration. sara carter is detailing that she has uncovered a, quote, treasure trove of documents that ties uranium 1 directly to the russians. only information you'll hear on hannity. i will be joined by both sara and john later in the program. first tonight, new reports of sexual misconduct rocking liberal america. plus a second woman accusing senator al franken of sexual misconduct. hillary clinton continues to viciously attack her husband's accusers even after saying all

women should be believed. the clintons led an effort to victim chain the women. with their willing accomplices in the media they create the environment we're living n all that and more. and tonight's big breaking news, opening monologue, an investigative report. >> heather: high profile main stream journalists. cbs news has suspended lion of the liberal media anchor charlie rose and pbs, stopping production and distribution of his show. following report in the "washington post." according to the post tonight, 8 women accusing rose of inappropriate sexual behavior, including making unwanted sexual advances, lewd phone calls, being naked in front of them, and groping them n a statement to the post, rose admitted wrongdoing, aapologized for his actions and said that he thought he was pursuing shared feelings.

there's "new york times" reporter glen brusht, also suspended over a vox.com report where several women accuse him of sexual misconduct. unwanted sexual contact and kissing. thrush has apologized. senator al franken and the latest comments from hillary clinton exposing a massive problem with the liberal mainstream media. for decades the media has been feigning moral outrage against republicans while defending year in and year out those democrats who have been accused of doing far worse. a massive double standard. tonight, there is a new allegation against franken. a second woman has accused democratic senator al franken of sexual misconduct, alleging during a 2010 state fair in minnesota senator franken grabbed her behind while the two

posed for a picture. she posted the picture on facebook and responded writing, al franken totally molested me, creeper. this is two years into his first term as a u.s. senator. senator franken is responding to the latest allegations saying he takes thousands of pictures of people he doesn't remember the incident. senator groper said he feels badly that the woman felt disrespected. we reached out to senator franken for a statement but his office, shockingly, refuses to get back to us. none of this should really be all that surprising. this is the staple guy who made jokes nobody else in the media talks about, about drugging and raping women. joke? who does this. and last week, franken was accused of sexual misconduct by lee ann tweeden, revealing explosive information about senator franken according to her during a 2006uso tour.

franken forcibly kissed her, supposedly rehearsing a skit. there's also this photo of franken groping tweeden while she was asleep on a flight. lee ann tweeden didn't know it happened until after she got home and started looking through pictures of that trip. franken did issue an apology but claims he doesn't remember the kissing incident. he's accused of harassing another woman, melanie morgan, co-founder of the website media equalizer, accusing franken of harassing her on the phone. this allegedly happened after they got into an on-air argument after appearance on bill maher's show in 2000. melanie morgan said she threatened to call the police to get franken to stop. deceit that, the members of the media a making excuses for al franken tonight. take a look. >> there's a new report that senator al franken grabbed the woman's behind at a fair back in 2010. he says he doesn't remember doing it.

we'll start to go after everyone in every power industry for something like a butt slap? i'm worried there will be no one left running anything. >> may be true. >> ask him to resign? i don't know if that's the appropriate response. no senator has been asked to resign, ever. >> also unfortunately, slowly split culturally, into a moment when forgiveness is now married to adeology f you're a conservative, bill clinton, you know, or al franken, get him out. >> took a picture which his office says was a joke, that showed him potentially, not actually groping but mock groping her. she also published a picture, that was given to her, of her asleep with senator franken mock groping her. tennessee in the case of lee ann tweeden, it's all about. franken isn't denying it. shows how low the mainstream media, democrats, go to defend

people that suit their ideology like franken. what the mainstream media won't tell you, franken has been sick and twisted for years. he was on "saturday night live" 1995, he suggested a skit about drugging and raping leslie stall of 60 minutes. he said, quote, i give the pills to leslie stahl, when she's passed out i take her to the closet and rape her. that's why you never see leslie until february when she passes out, i put her in various positions and take pictures of her. creepy. supposed to be funny? and in 2000, franken wrote a satirical article for playboy magazine, we can't even repeat on tv. in one part he wrote, quote, i'm talking of course about the internet which is a terrific learning tool. a couple of years ago when he was 1, my son he used the internet for a sixth grade report on bees tee at. in 2008 when he was running for the senate he apologized for the

comments we showed you. turned out he was lying. how do we know? in his new book he said he faked the apologies in order to win votes. he wroets, quote, to say i was sorry for wroting a joke to sell out my career, who i had been, and i wasn't sorry. what i had written or pitched that stupid leslie stahl joke, i was doing my job. oh, his apologies aren't real. there's the clintons. now, those of you in the mainstream media, why is this important? for 30 years, 30, democrats on behalf of the clintons have smeared, shan dered, victim shamed anyone and everyone who dared to tell what turned out to be the truth about bill clinton. and the media always has been, their willing accomplices in and out, they have been complicit up and including last year. the only reason now some of the political world finally starting to acknowledge what clinton did

is because bill and hillary clinton are no longer important. now that it's politically expedient that they can't hurt them, the clintons, members of the media, even some, only some, are beginning to start to call out the deable behavior. it's not -- beplorable behavior. 1991 until 2016, the media defends the clintons on everything. regardless of how damaging or disgraceful the allegations were. and, well, they can do it now, say, well, maybe it wasn't right. i believe juanita. hillary clinton continues to smear, slander her husband's accuser today. take a listen to the latest attack. >> look, i think every situation has to be judged on its own merit. i think it's unfortunate that people are either misremembering or misinterpreting history. >> heather: really, warrior man misremembering, hillary?

what happened to believing. as hillary told us in an election year, women when they come forward, remember this? >> today i want to send a message to every survive or of sexual assault. don't let anyone silence your voice. you have the right to be heard. you have the right to be believed. and we're with you. >> heather: right to be believed, you're with them? does hillary clinton really think that the women who have accused her husband of sexual misconduct, rape, are actually misremembering what bill did to them? hillary herself orchestrated a campaign to discredit and destroy all of them. here's what the media said about the clinton a's cuesers last year during the election. >> the rape acquisition is decades old and discredited. >> only in the sort of the mind of some sort of movie writer of a third world democracy, dictatorship, would you have a candidate publicly humiliate a

former occupant of that office by parading all of these other people around as well. >> hik is the candidate -- hillary clinton is the candidate. she was not implicated in any misconduct. she was not some one who was accused, even, of doing anything untoward with regard to these women. >> heather: dispickable. now 2017, decide the come to jesus moment, from some on the left, some are still clinton sympathizers in the press and democratic party. they'll never give it up. watch this. >> he more than paid the price for what he did. the mere fact he went through an impeachment process as president. means that there will always be a shadow on the legacy of his presidency. so at least from my point of view i think he more than paid the price. >> he didn't get away with anything. he was investigated, he was litigated, he was impeached. he finally, after lying about the affair, admitted it,

apologized, multiple times, in very heart-felt way. >> all of those allegations, there's so many, there's a bunch. >> all of which were investigated, litigated, adjudicated. >> heather: bill clinton paid the price for his since. the clintons treated bill's accusers importantly, systematically to shame them and smear them and shan shan der them. in '92, gennifer flowers revealed she had a 12-year affair with clinton. the clinton am pain, they had a war room, bimbos. bill and hillary show up and define the charges and went off the flawers' character. the media never took it seriously. look at this documentary, "the war room," how the press reacted

to a question during that flowers press conference. watch them laugh. >> did the governor at any time tell you on the telephone -- >> he told me to just deny it. >> governor clinton use a condom? [laughing] . >> right here. [laughing] >> ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, we're going to quit this. if there are any further questions that are degrading in my opinion. >> heather: that's the media sm they told cash. >> they said if we had been in front of a jury, isn't it true you were asked by the a.p. in june of 1990, you said no. weren't you asked by the arkansas democrat and you said no. i mean, i would cries fie her.

really, hillary, crucify her? what happened to believing her. women have a right to be believed. karl bernstein's book about hillary, he writes that clinton would refer to gennifer flowers as trailer trash. bill clinton admitted to having a sexual relationship with flowers, admitting it only when he was under oath. paula jones accused bill clinton of exposing himself in a hotel room. after filing a lawsuit against him, clinton paid jones $850,000, with an out of court settlement n related case clinton lost his wall license in arkansas -- law license for five years in arkansas. the clinton machine went vicious after jones. according to the "new york times" and fake news cnn, long-time clinton a ally cnn pundit james colin, said if you drag a $100 bill through a trailer park you never know what you'll find. carville slammed jones, say sheeg only sued clinton because of money.

then monica lewinsky, the white house intern that had an affair with bill clinton. just like the other accusers, hillary had a nasty nickname. according to a journal entry made public, hillary's friend, diane blair, said hillary called lewinsky a narcissistic looney down. kathleen lilly, accused bill clinton of grobing and grabbing and fondling and touching and kissing her against her will. while she was a volunteer at the white house. willy later said that hillary enabled her his panned's behavior. and you can't forget juanita broderick, she said that bill clinton raped her in 1978. she describes an encounter where hillary tried to silence her. that's who the clintons are. what they did to these women is reprehensible. clinton's 1992 presidential campaign came up with the term bimbo eruptions to describe the women who made accusations against bill.

george stephanopolous said hillary said we have to destroy her when describing one much bill's accusers. and watch how george handled one person that threatened to leak information to the press. >> what about the names, i can send you names, addresses and phone numbers of people you had an affair with. it isn't true. it's completely (bleep). if you said that bill clinton is father of an illegitimate black child people would think you're crazy. if you do this, i guarantee you, you'll never work in democratic politics gem. maybe you don't want. to you will be embarrassed nationally. people will think, nobody will believe you. and people will think you're scummy. the alternative is you don't do it, because people tomorrow

aren't going to matter. and you have a campaign that understands in a difficult time you did something right. that's important. doesn't mean anything, we can't could anything for you, specifically, or anything like that. but you know that you did the right thing. >> good morning america, you'll never work again, you will be embarrassed, blah, blah, blah. this is the clintons, who they are. allies in the democratic party, the friends in the media, knew it. they did everything they could to cover it up. and completely trash bill's accusers up to and including last year's election. that inexcusable? the media never reported that hillary and her family foundation, i talked about it a lot last year, took tense of millions of dollars from countries that accuse women, kill guys and lesbians, persecute christians and jews. she took money. clintons taking it, endorsed

that behavior, bought her silence, and the media of course all last year gave them a free pass. now, so while it's nice to see that some on the left and the media, now that the clintons have no power, only starting to admit how horrible the clintons were, i argue it's too little too late. here with reaction michelle malkin, former deputy assistant to the president fox news strategist sebastian gorka. i want to be clear, michelle, nobody has a monopoly, there are horrible republicans out there. horrible people in general. that's not what i'm describing here. i am describing systematically because of politics, the clintons were protected by the media, and they went out and just abused these women again and again and smeared them to death. even up to and including the election last year. . right, sean. this isn't ancient history. you have all of these liberal

wheedleers asking why, why is sean happy any, michelle malkin, taubing about bill clinton. so much of the mess we're in is a result and legacy of the clinton victim smear machine. they're the god parents, hillary and bill clinton, the god parents of victim shaming smear tactics. we have this case where you have the liberal media journalists, tying themselves in yoga knots to try and reconcile their own roles and their own cull tabilt in enabling the clinton smears against his accusers and victims, with the left wing femsist ideology of believing all women. and now, what we know, of course, is it's not revelation, it's merely confirmation, that the idea that we should believe all women has an exception. really, the rule for radicals 2017 has always been that you

should believe all women except when they're accusing liberal democratic men and liberal hollywood weirdos. there's a second corollary to the unwritten rule that's exploded and exposed for the farce that it is, the second is this, sean and dr. gorka, it's this, that all women must be respected unless of course they are female republicans, conservatives, pro-lifers, stay at home moms, and gun owners. i have lived this for the past 25 years in public life along with all of the women who have been smeared by leftists in the media and the democrat party. they're always treated as less than women. as less than human. and we have, when we have called out the my soj any and hypocrisy of the left we get aak packed more. it's thicker than thanksgiving gravy. >> sean: dr. gorka? >> i don't know how to follow.

that michelle is right. let me expand the optic here. there's the issue of the absolute double standards on the left. so, now, 30 years later they find morality? so it's okay if al franken admits to it, then it just disappears as an issue? you look at bob menendez, we're not going to cover that story, but we don't have the proof on judge moore and he's a problem? number one, it's the unbelievable level of double standards. but the second thing is, beyond that, it's what stherl atkinson has written about in her book, it's the persistent smear tactics. just making stuff up, ball games it's politically expedient to your friends. how is it that you have all these kids who are supposed to be journalists, but they literally manufacture stories out of nothing, to attack the president. sometimes it's trifian. you remember recently, that the

fish feeding event in japan, right, where they crop out the president is actually doing exactly what his host did before. why, because it's expedient to make the president look bad. or he gets far more serious, cnn is going to say that james comey is going to counter everything the president said about the fbi investigating him or not. it goes on and on and on because it's all about politics. it's never about the truth, sean, it's never just about journalism. >> sean: we'll keep michelle, i want to get you one more quick question, dr. gorka. what happens, charlie rose is admitting it, franken we have the picture, some cases u. evidence. clinton over time reveal that these things happen. what do you do when it is he said-she said. how do people ascertain the difference where allegations are flying, some people deny them? say it didn't happen. it's all about two things. the credibility of the force, is

the individual credible? can it be corroborated. the big problem we have today, sean, we don't have investigative journalists. people like sara carter are so rare, they give a 21-year-old kid a computer and access to google and they call him a journalist. that's how politico works. you can get to the bottom of this but you have to wear out shoe leather. you have to talk to people, you have to corroborate the stories and that just isn't done any more. it's accusations, thrown out there for political damage. >> sean: thank you for being with us, dr. gorka. michelle, we will have more on the sexual misconduct scandals rocking liberal america. later, we have bombshell, new reports, huge news tonight about uranium one. go to my twitter, we want to hear from you, is it time for the clintons to apologize to the american people. who they have done and what their sur row gats have done, what the media has gone.

♪ >> sean: welcome back to "hannity." new allegations all >> allegations of sexual misconduct. joining us fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett, rebecca rose woodland and michelle malkin. in some cases you have evidence. in some cases you have apologies and admissions. in some cases you have he said-she said. stake the franken case, that picture. that doesn't mean everything else is true. but it speaks volumes. it speaks volumes about who makes a joke about raping and drugging people. what is funny about that? nothing. >> that photograph is damning, incriminating evidence of a felony by al franken. on a military plane, that's

federal government. the statute is called abusive sexual contact. >> sean: that picture is a crime. >> that is a crime under federal law. fact she is asleep is of no consequence, the law specifically says we will presume there is no consent if the victim is asleep. touching a woman over her clothing is still abusive sexual contact. it's tricky because of the statute of limitations. but the government could channel and say the statute of limitations is pulled or suspended until the discovery of the crime. >> sean: i think america tonight, they're shocked by the accuse of power aspects of all of this. and i think also people trying to figure out what is true, what is not true, when people apologize and admit behavior. rose did that tonight. in the case of franken he admitted at least partial, some of it. you are an attorney you sdeel with these cases. >> you deal with these cases often.

it's important to note there's over 300,000 sexual harassment and rape case as year, 90% unreported. the first year, the second year. all of these, this intense scrutiny about these women coming forward years later. >> sean: are most allegations true? >>. >> yes, we do find. >> sean: i'm asking. are all of them true? >> of course not. there's nothing that is 100% in the human race. always people either mischaracterizing or misunderstanding or misrepresenting. these cases, sean, we have so many women coming forward it's not a partisan issue. it's important you've been saying that. it's not a republican-democrat issue. this is an issue about crimes against women. and it has nothing to do with whether or not you believe one ideology or not. that's where it's becoming very disturbing. >> sean: the media, and clinton apologists, continue to excuse the behavior.

>> you played the tape of saying clinton got away with nothing. he got away with alleged rape and alleged sexual assault. and then you play the clip of jeff tobin, the cnn analyst who said this had nothing to do with hillary clinton. it did. she insulted, demeaned, ridiculed those women. she was complicit. >> sean: michelle? >> i am an investigative journalist myself and i want to address the comments that sebastian gorka said at the end of the last segment, where are the investigative journalists, particularly on this issue. it is an issue i've been covering for the last year at crt.com. particularly when it comes to false allegations of sexual assault and rape. and to answer the question about how often it happens, it is a lie of the left wing femsist establishment that only 2% of allegations are false. in fact, the literature shows it's between 8% and 41%.

the issue that you raise is very important. which is how do order citizens who cannot trust ideologues and advocates to tell them the trouth in the media, each and everyone of these allegations. the one piece of truth that did come out of hillary clinton's mouth, disingenuous as it was, you have to take each case separately. the sheer number of allegations in any one man's case does not prove that sexual assault or rape happened. you have to think about timing, you have to think about context, you have to think about the fact in the case of these "washington post" investigations that you talk about allegations that are somewhere, sometimes 20, 30 years old and you had activist, journalists, soliciting and procuring women to tell these stories. just because stories all sound the same doesn't mean they're true. assertions are not truth. until they are:brighted as facts

and:brighted with what i've seen in all of the reporting i've shown from the series that i did to railroaded on wrongful convicts. many innocent men have been absolutely, yes. you have to talk about women have incentives to lie because of money. >> that is true, there are people who mischaracterize or straight-out lie. but in these situations we have a lot of collaboration. we have a lot of the men admitting these things have happened. so once you have an admission, we're in a whole different situation. >> sean: thank you all. great insight from all of you. when we come back, an explosive report, we have just gotten a new bombshell report about uranium one. busy news night on hannity. alsh newt gingrich,

my name is jeff sheldon, and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize

i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free. ♪ >> sean: just wrecking news, the hill john solomon, sara carter, they released bombshell reports equally tonight. solomon reporting according to the memos obtained of fbi informant that had his mna lifted, gathered years and years of evidence of russia's plot to control nuclear fuel. sara carter report sheeg has received a treasure trove of documents that prove tonight the fbi informant has knowledge of

russia's involvement in uranium one. also joining us, is the attorney for the fbi informant, victoria toensing along with john and sara. sara, let's start with your report. a treasure trove. that is huge. >> it is, sean. there's over 5,000 documents which include e-mails, briefs, other documentation, memorandums, that the informant had turned over to the fbi and justice department. within these documents, it's very evident of russia's intentions to enter the american energy market and their intentions to acquire you are a rainium one. >> sean: john you going into extensive detail in retailing how the fbi informant, you said six years, i thought he was an informant for four years. if i read your piece correct. he has evidence, was on the inside, directly from putin's

russia, the push for nuclear fuel deals. and use, all the crimes we've talked about, bribry, racketeering, corroborated, will be corroborated further go. into your report. >> sara said something about the importance of the dominance of the uranium market. this is an e-mail that the fbi had for six years. it shows that uranium one was part of a russian strategy to control, not just benefit from the global market, control the global market. puts the united states at a disadvantage. that's the sort of evidence that this fbi informant has. and if you go back, last week, we heard several years from the justice department. no connection to uranium one, ee mails that say uranium one. they say there was no connection between this and the criminal case. the criminal case got in evidence 2009 before the uranium deal was approved by the obama administration.

people say these documents don't agree with. >> sean: i have a high-ranking congressman and that nose, let's put that it way, sent me a note, the knowledge of key administration officials will be the next thing proven by both of you and the rismgs to the clinton foun dpags. -- rinks to the clinton foundation. is that true? >> i believe it is true. >> sean: you believe or you know? i can't ask victoria question. >> i know it's true. i know that looking at these documents, following the money, sean, following the money is what's important here. now, the justice department has not put it out that they will possibly call a special counsel to this. this is still out there. they are looking into it. that's something that they need to decide. but whether it's a special counsel or whether it's a prosecutor that's investigating this, they will be able to follow the money. some things -- >> sean: when you say follow the money, my suspicion is the money

came from russia, through the canadian donors to the clinton foundation. >> you have good instincts. there are other areas they will look at. this is like peeling back an onion. you peel one part and find another part. that's what is doeg going to require somebody to do an extensive -- >> sean: sara, it's now cascading. >> it is. >> sean: and john i want you to respond, the clinton foundation, this will be traced back to high-ranking obama administration officials and the clinton foundation f you add the money portion sara mentioned. >> i do. i think the place we will talk about is called the clinton global initiative. sort of a side project of the clinton foundation. there are new flows of money there we will be able to report on. and also, personal business projects, very senior clinton people that got a remarkable infusion of cash from russia. we will talk about that, put another layer of interest to this story. >> sean: but we have a lot of

time in this segment, i want to go slowly. both of you, before i get to victoria, in your pieces today said 5,000 documents. i hear the number the fbi informant is much, much greater. tens of thousands, true or false? >> yeah, that seems to be accurate. we have a sub seft documents, they're very volunteer lummious. >> sean: gloria, one of the great attorneys, the most difficult to get information out of. one of the things i've known you about, and interviewed you so many times over the years, now have been doing a deep dive into all of this. are you now representing this fbi informant. i think who will become an american hero out of all of this, apparently he was fighting and begging and pleading the saying the russians are here, why aren't you paying attention. i hope my instincts are right there. number two, how devastating, legally, is this going to be based on what i was asking sara

and john about impacting former obama officials, money, clinton foundation. >> well, let me go to number one first, that is the whole essence of what john and sara and i are talking about is that in 2009, 2010 our fbi and presumably our justice department and the white house as my client was told all knew about this corruption in the russian nuclear energy area. and there's no separate companies. they're all related. the russian nuclear energy is controlled from the top, from putin. they're all one, they all talk to each other. so the evidence about this corruption was known to our government in 2009, 2010, and why is it that they weren't told or people knowing about it. >> sean: explain the nine agencies approving the deal that gave control of uranium one to

the bad actor putin russia. >> they said, the board said, that the bad russians could buy uranium one which contained access to 20% of the u.s. uranium. why was that decision made? did bob mueller go to eric holder and tell him? >> sean: he was one of the nine. >> did bob mueller go to the white house and tell him? the fbi acts told my client they were briefing the president about his conduct. of course, when the decision was made -- >> sean: back to the original question, counselor, if i may, if i may, you're too good at your job. this is a very serious point. putting your legal hat on, objectively speaking, yes they knew, the evidence will prove it, based on the documents, and your client, crimes xwhited at a high level? national security compromised? >> well, of course, it goes without saying, giving the

russians control of the uranium is a national problem. what john and sara are doing, will be revealing about where lots of various money went and where it came from. >> sean: always go back, and i believe at the end of this you guys deserve a pulitzer, i'm not the only one thinking that, you have dug so deep, i applaud you both. and i want to ask, as it relates to who knew what when. what did they know, when did they know it, john, i'm talking about obama, mueller, eric holder, hillary clinton. >> we're at a disadvantage now, we don't have those records, those are the records that congress needs to get. i have a person quoted in my story that has direct knowledge. this person said, without a shred of doubt we knew in 2009 a year before the ruling, that they were engaged in criminality.

without a shadow of a doubt we knew that russia was trying to gain a corner on the u.s. market, get a stronghold on the uranium. without a doubt ee we knew they were losing political lers to get their way here. we're talking about krom, like this document says, trying to gain krom of the market. that has to be a national security interest. >> sean: presidential daily briefings, we're told, sara, had this information in it, before they approved it. >> sean, that's what we need to find out. we need to see this presidential daily briefing. congress can get those. they will be able to know whether or not president obama was briefed on this. and according to a number of people that i've spoken with as well, he was. so i think that will reveal a whole other layer of who knew what, where and when. then we follow the money, and it will reveal even more about hillary clinton and what she knew and when did she know it. the other members of the board.

>> sean: and obama and holder and mueller. john, we're running out of time. >> i think even sessions and rosenstein have questions to answer. people in congress don't think they have gotten a straight answer. >> sean: victoria, we get the final word from you. you are so good at your job. you are so anow knowingly good. the american people deserve the truth on. this our security was compromised, we import uranium, we don't have enough. newt gingrich weighs in on this and more things about the clintons, are they facing their day of reckoning. a big announcement at the end of the show. the end of the show. ♪

>> sean: snou as we continue on hannity, the author of the best

selling book vengeance, fox news contributor, former speaker of the house, newt beginning grip. you have incredible perspective. 30 years of the clintons and 30 years of smearing and slandering those women, now the rec new england of the clintons are coming. they came on the national scene in 1990, 1991. now the clintons can't do anything for the democrats any more. as i'm looking at them as a party, i'm saying when is the kay of reckoning? she took all this money from countries that abuse women, persecute christians and jews, kill guys and lesbians. it's insulting. >> we are at an important turning point for american culture. we went through the age of the kardashian, where could you do anything, get away with anything. there's a pass nating book that contrasts the independent counsel and bill clinton and suggests that actually that

particular investigation was when virtue died in america. maybe what we begin to see happen is virtue coming back in america, people realize whether it's the extraordinary problem of the opiod epidemic, or the stunning harassment and vie lakes of women that we're seeing come out day after day now. all of a sudden, all of these things that the left tolerated are beginning to be unacceptable and painful. and that may lead the country, not just republicans, not just conservatives, but the country to have a really serious conversation about what are the standards we want going forward. >> sean: how do we ever ascertain truth, he said-she said, it becomes difficult if you believe in the presumption of innocence. >> well, there are two different things here. you do have a tendency for hysteria in a lynch mob attitude. anybody can say anything about the last 40 years, and there's

an automatic presumption of guilt. that has to be washed away. go back to the principle, innocent until proven guilty. we have seen cases, the duke university, i think it was their lacrosse team. totally smeared. and turned out to be totally false. a whole series of these cases. do i think in that sense you have to go back to the core principle that you're innocent until proven guilty. on the other hand, i also think you have to recognize, that one of the purposes of congress is to undertake investigations almost like a grand jury. the things that are coming out now, for example, about the whole uranium one case and the pieces that surround that. and i say to myself, where's the congressional hearing that week after week, month after month, simply strips away the lies and gets the facts back up so the american people can see what really happened. >> sean: the new development, i know you read this article, you

had an fbi informant in there, may have been there as long as six years we're discovering, thousands of pages of documents available, and that in fact they knew that vladimir putin purposely set out with agents involved in criminal activity. bribes, extortion, money laundering, racketeering that, we had an informant that knew it was hospital happening, reporting back to the fbi, in obama's presidential daily briefings. before the approval was given for clinton and eric holder, allowed this deal this go through. on the surface never made sense. 20% of american uranium in the bad actor, putin and russia. >> let me tell you, they have done the most thorough, most systematic work on this. if you take their work and that

of peter schweitzer who wrote the book "clinton cash" between them, they have done more to educate the country than all of the congressional hearings, all of the stuff done at the justice department. it is appalling the gap of serious, responsible investigation when they come up, week after week with more and more stories. you've been, frankly, the number one person helping them reach the american people. without your support of their work, they would still be facically totally unknown. but they ought to get a pulitzer prize for the level of investigative research they're doing. >> sean: i agree. last question, the president in china gets these four or three ucla players out. the father said he didn't do much. you steal in china, you go to jail for years. and so the president says, well maybe i just should have left you there. i'm thinking, that's pretty

ungrateful, isn't it that, the father, if it was my son i'd say sir, thank you for standing up, i'm going to handle whatever it was they did wrong myself at home, thank you. this could have been a potential disaster in his life. there are people in the corrupt news media in this country tonight, that are saying, what the president tweeted is racism. because he basically said maybe i should have left them in jail. >> look, that had nothing to do with the race. first of all, i think it's a sad commentary on what's happened to america, when a father being told that his son was shop lifting in china isn't angry at his son. i mean he ought to be grateful to the president, his son could have been in really deep trouble. second, if you're a ucla basketball player, you're at a great unfortunate, great future, what are you doing shoplifting? i think people should be pretty irritated that these guys, who have a privileged life, have a

privileged future, channels for a multimillion dollar career, are out here, you know, embarrassing america, looking stupid and doing something that's totally dumb. i'm embarrassed for that father, he didn't have the decency to say thank you, mr. president, i have to talk to my kid, didn't get things across to him. i just think this is a sign of what's sick about america. people don't take responsibility. they don't take accountability. now, probably trump shouldn't have said i should have left them in jail. what he ought to say is i wish that father had been in jail, put the kids in jail. the father is ungrateful, not the kids. >> sean: thank you, sir, for what you did for my son, i'll take care of the stupidity of what he was involved in. mr. speaker, great to see you, thank you for being with us. when we come back a big announcement about a hannity investigation. if you've been covering for the clintons, you aren't going to like this.

>> sean: welcome back to hannity. before we go tomorrow night you don't want to miss the show. we will be exposing the biggest enablers, 30 years, of bill clinton's predatory behavior. we will name names, something you will only see on this show. now, that's all the time we have left this evening. we make a promise, we will never be the mainstream left wing fake news destroy trump media.

set your dvr, never miss an episode of hannity. in washington, there's -- laura ingraham is standing by. i'm giving you five seconds. take it away. in . >> i'm going to give advice on how to deal with the psycho hillary antifa -- >> oh, no, sean. i'm going to tune in. thanks for another great show. >> laura: welcome to washington, this is "the ingraham angle. "t" we start with breaking news tonight. a federal judge in california has permanently blocked president trump's executive order defunding sanctuary cities. the judge, you may remember him,