good night. i saw her in the hall. kimberly is fill nothing for sean hannity tonight. they are talking about what you care b. tonight. they'll be talking about everything that matters. ♪ >> kimberly: welcome to this special edition of hannity. i'm kimberly gill fro in tonight for sean the so-called champion for wome women -- minnesota senator al franken was forced to issue yet another apology yesterday after two more women came forward and accused him of inappropriately grabbing them from behind. bringing his total number of alleged sexual harassment victims to four. the apology read in part "i'm a one person.

i hugged people. i've learned from recent stories that some of those encounters have crossed the line for some women and i know that any number is too many. i feel terribly that i've made some women feel badly and for that, i am so sorry. i want to make sure that never happens again." senator franken is not the only democrat facing accusations jonathan conyers is also being accused. the so-called party of women's rights isn't quite united in its response to this to this inter partes sexual harassment. some calling for conyers to step down while others try to dodge the subject. watch this. >> conyers says it didn't happen, you say he should resign. why? >> because enough is enough. at this point, what i am voicing publicly is what every single

private citizen is saying across america. why are the rules for politicians in washington different than they are for everyone else? once we circuiting into the realm of politicians, let's get the ethics commission into it and let's investigate this and take forever to come up with a conclusion. >> should he resign? >> i think the ethics process should precede the allegations against congressman conyers are disturbing and disappointing deeply troubling. the ethics investigation should be thorough and swift and comprehensive. >> kimberly: is it time for conyers and franken to resign and will more outrage fracture the democratic party? joining us now is fox news contributor, allen west, and kaylee mack and any and fox news

correspondent at large, geraldo rivera. thank you for joining me on a friday evening. i'll start with you. he is expected to speak with reporters on sunday. what do you think you might say or should say to convince people that he should and fact not resign? >> he's been apologizing nonstop kind of. i expect that he'll say he's sorry, but he's staying in his seat. i have make a quick observation. i hate when the intensity of our reaction to some of these allegations is directly related to the political party they a person being accused. i wanted to have the same reaction regardless of whether the perpetrators are republican or democrat. the other thing i want to say is is when someone is in accused rapist like bill cobbs be.

what is this accusation? conyers wearing his underwear in front of a staffer. i heard someone say today, it definitely was not sexual. the thing that bugs me about conyers is got the taxpayer to pay his settlement for allegedly being out of line with one of his staffers. >> kimberly: you are saying he should get a pass because he's 88? that's ridiculous. it's also about how he makes it a person feel. it's inappropriate. he should be conducting any kind of meeting like that. we don't give a pass for something like that. >> my problem is very simple. if it's not criminal conduct that's being alleged, then what is it exactly? it's going to the ethics committee they say. the ethics committee cannot, by law, review something that is a crime. if it's a crime that's alleged, then it goes to the u.s.

attorney's office that you come as a great attorney, already know. people minimize the ethics committee, they're not even going to get it. what is this? are we using this new wave of sexual harassment allegations to get back in bed with bosses or hated ex-lovers? i worry we started down a very slippery slope. >> kimberly: there has to be a course of due process in some situations and standards and also, adjudicating the situation in terms of developing a pattern, verifying witnesses. i don't think in any way it should minimize the seriousness of the allegations. they should be taken seriously and thoroughly investigated. >> >> you're absolutely right, kimberly. what's disturbing for me is the fact that who are these people who decide which women are to be believed?

i think that is what is most confusing about this situation. this goes all the way back to bill clinton and the women who refused him, but they were not supposed to be believed and they were attacked. when you have a 40-year-old case and you talk about roy moore, then all of a sudden that's to be believed. when it comes to al franken who is just a guy who likes to hug people and it's no big deal or with john conyers, we want to look the other way. there has to be some consistency and what we see happening out there and i don't see that consistency. >> kimberly: how do you see this situation? it's tough because it can happen in the fact of how women perceive it or someone who's been in a situation like this. we are all forward due process and adjudicating it and determining the credibility. it is more complicated when things go back way in time. >> that's right and that's why

every single one of these cases has to be looked at in isolation. they can't be lumped together. everything a person should be heard. it's very troubling when we see particularly from congressman conyers when we see someone who pays $27,000 of federal taxpayer money to settle with a woman who is accusing him of firing her for not accepting his sexual advances. that misuse of the taxpayer funds should be enough to call for his resignation. what you're seeing is a case of the powerful praying on the people. it's a by a party line, its people and powerful positions in hollywood, media, congress preying on the american people. >> kimberly: geraldo, the democratic party made themselves out to be the champion of women's rights. we can expect to march on washington on behalf of the women that have made his allegations or been victimized? >> i wouldn't hold my breath on

that one, but let me give you an example. we mentioned franken. he is now infamous for patting the of someone he took a picture with allegedly. that's outrageous. what about the allegation that's gained quite a bit of legitimacy that george h.w. bush, bush 41 from his wheelchair tells a joke when women stand alongside him, who's your favorite comedian? mine is david cop-a-feel and then he pats them on the butt. >> kimberly: you're the one who's making the exception for the elderly that they get some kind of get out of sexual harassment jail free card. >> may be i was speaking as a senior citizen myself. my main point with it conyers that the allegation -- is one

thing when he was going after allegedly some subordinate and asked them when they got paid up for the taxpayer money, that's outrageous and the fact that he somehow weaseled his way so he didn't have to pay it out of his own pocket, the fact that it was secret for so long, i think congress is totally complicit. i think on right and left, democrat republican, i can give you 100 cases where mark foley, bitter, craig, i can go on and on and on. how many times our leaders have been guilty of these. >> kimberly: also, taxpayer money should encode to pay for these and the abuse that people have to suffer in a work place. do you think this is a double standard of any sort? >> from that republican party, you see it on a equivocal stance from the president and our party saying if any allegation is true, they should step down.

maybe it's a handful now, but where is the consistency from their party? don't cover for your own, be a party of women. >> kimberly: how about that because they do hold themselves out to be the gold standard, but with the response and assessment and being proactive on behalf of women in the sense of liberals and democrats has not been their most were the shining moment. >> what you're absolutely right. the actions do not match up with the rhetoric and you brought up the point, i'm waiting for madonna or ashley judd are some of these individuals to come out and start screaming from the raptors, but you won't hear that. i was in congress when the anthony weiner incident came down in for him to have done the things he did and then continue to run for mayor of

new york city, you have to put these things in perspective, but if congress wants to do the right thing, they should let us know and full transparency who are the people that were recipients of these taxpayer-funded bailouts for their behavior? that's something they need to do or else it will be a boys club. >> kimberly: great point, geraldo, but there needs to be a thorough and fair accounting from both sides in terms of how these things were handled. an investigation back to understand that, where the taxpayer funds allocated to and after what kind of due process et cetera are we able to vet the allegations and then to act in a way expeditiously to make sure that there was some kind of justice and some kind of reprisal and some kind of education going forward that this wooded fact not not going to occur? >> we have anthony weiner going to jail, so justice has been served in his case.

you have barton out of texas who just got caught sending pictures of his genitalia to a girl he was courting. what's he going to do? >> kimberly: his statement is that it was a relationship that he was having with these different women and there wasn't some back and forth in terms of don't try to blackmail you with these photos and he went to capitol police. >> i was at polo, the restaurant that you love in new york and kathy lee gifford was there. we saw her at a table as we were leaving and she said to me and erica, can you believe what's going on right now? i don't know who to say hello t to. i'm afraid someone will consider it sexual harassment. maybe you know it when you see it, but my point is you need clear standards and you need a standardize repercussion for bad behavior.

obviously a criminal case, anthony weiner goes to jail, good riddance. that's where he should go. i think congress has to clean its own house. >> kimberly: wear tight on time. kaylee, you that the final word. >> we have a systemic problem that when accuser brings back a claim against a powerful lawmaker, or obstructed to immediate counseling. it's a powerful versus the people, it is excusable and congress needs a clean this up. >> kimberly: lieutenant colonel, a lot more needs to be done here. seems like they're feeling pretty abysmally. >> there's a lot more that needs to be done. i find it very interesting that we have congress deciding how much money we can keep ourselves as they go through this tax bill process, but yet they're using our money to take care of their aberrant behaviors. >> kimberly: absolutely unbelievable. thanks so much panel, fantastic to have you here tonight. one prominent democrat is now

slumming former president bill clinton for his history of sexual misconduct. we'll tell you who it is after the break. stay with us on this special edition of hannity. ♪

>> kimberly: will come back to this special edition of "hannity." senator franken and congressman conyers aren't the only problems for democrats. for decades, women have accused former president bill clinton of serious sexual misconduct including rape. including former senior advisor to president obama, watch this. >> i was arguing with a friend who said how can people have

voted for donald trump after that access hollywood tape? i had to be honest and i said i voted for bill clinton twice. i think he was a really fine president, a brilliant guy, committed public servant, but i knew, everyone in politics knew about his behavior and we look the other way. i think there's a lot of soul-searching to be done. >> kimberly: shocking revelation. many believe that bill clinton and his misconduct and subsequent coverups may have played a role in his wife's brutal 2016 seek for a seat. no one in the democratic party have asked her advice for the 2020 presidential election. i wonder why. >> has anyone been to see you yet? >> nobody's actually been to see me. i see democrats all the time and

nobody has said i'm going to run or i'm thinking about running, give me advice. it is too soon. there may be some private planning going on by some people, i wouldn't know who, i couldn't venture a guess, but in terms of actually speaking out. people have said i want to talk to you, but i haven't had those conversations in large measure because i say i'm going to focus next year on 2018 and then i'll be happy to talk. >> kimberly: joining us now, jean allowed in, and doug shown. thank you both for joining us. there is a very heated conversation about sexual misconduct. you think we're going to see more and more democrats distance themselves from bill and hillary clinton in light of thi

this? >> look, kimberly, my sense is that with bill clinton, many of the allegations have already been litigated, they have been dealt with in an impeachment process or in court. to me, if there are no allegations, let's do with them. to go back 20 years to relitigate at or earlier, i think it's a waste of time and energy. i would say this. if you want to talk about uranium one, if you want to talk about the dossier, there are a lot of unanswered questions there. to go relitigate what bill clinton may or may not have done, i don't and that's worthwhile. what david axelrod says, when he says everyone knew, i didn't know. the revelations about monica lewinsky renews to me me when they came out.

>> kimberly: can you hear us now? >> i can hear you. >> kimberly: people were aware of what's going on and i understand not relitigating, however as a former prosecutor, when a crime has been committed, i don't look the other way just because of the passage of time. to me, when there's allegations of sexual misconduct, not just harassment, but rape, should not be addressed and what about the democrats owning up to that in terms of the double standard that they seem to have as of late? >> of course they have a double standard because if they didn't have a double standard, they wouldn't have any standards at all. this is a transparent attempt on the part of the democratic party now that a clinton will never be on a ballot again. the party of clinton, of

franken, they must think voters are really stupid if they're going to fall for the democratic party. just like you said, where's the apology to these women that they smeared for all these years? if they knew this was going on, what are they go along with a question mark >> kimberly: she makes a great point. when you see people that have been savaged in the press and the media and quite frankly, by hillary clinton herself, it's very disturbing. you would think it played a role in the fact that she was defeated. >> i think if you listen to a bill clinton campaign more in the midwest, focused on working-class voters, talked about jobs, she would have done a lot better than she did trying to mimic the obama campaign from 2008 and 2012. you mentioned juanita brodrick. as a prosecutor, you surely

would know that when there are multiple stories, multiple accounts of what happened in an event, it's a much tougher case to litigate when the person who allegedly was violated has told different stories at different times. >> kimberly: she complained of it, she had physical injuries to the lip. the bottom line is not bill clinton, but what hillary clinton did was wrong in the way she treated those women and then expected she was going to go want to be president of the united states given her abhorrent behavior. >> the way to have done this with any legitimacy is for the democrat party to come out as a party and apologize to these women. if they are so concerned about the long term stress of women who go through the sorts of things that they face every day

i met whenever they see the news, trying to take the moral high ground, then they should be concerned about the fact that these women are still traumatized by what happened to them under that administration. they've been continually traumatized after all of their allegations have been swept under the rug for all these years. it's too convenient for them to knock them out and say we are the party of sexual purity suddenly. the public as a going to buy this. >> kimberly: in an earlier segment, geraldo rivera was seeming to give a pass by saying conyers is older, so what if he has a meaning essentially in his underwear? i'm sure it wasn't sexual in nature. just because he didn't look at david beckham and his underwear that it's okay to do that? >> i have a different view of this. this is a real-time real-world event. let's let the ethics committee investigate and if the facts are

as compromising as you are now suggesting in many reports have suggested, i'm not sure there's a place for him in the house, i'm not sure it is a place for al franken and these reports about joe burton i think on the republican side also merit investigation by the ethics committee. put another way, i think we need to be nonpartisan about it, not trying to cast one party or the other party. if it happens in its as egregious as it's suggested, let's investigate. >> kimberly: regard with the politics, it should have the same standards and due process for either side. that's the bottom line. >> there is a really important psychological component to these women i think as we are going through this process that they are validated that they know that some of these things have been investigated, but we also need to be very careful as a public to make sure that we make

the distinction between evidence and facts versus feelings and allegations because there is a distinct difference in we can't keep messing them together like the democrat party seems to want to do a lot of times. >> to me, this is nonpartisan. i think you're exactly right. you know makes a very good point, we need to investigate allegations, see the full totality of what did or didn't happen and make judgments they are. we can't rush to judgment on partial press reports that are not in any way full accounts of what did or didn't happen. >> kimberly: with the passage of time, when you see these situations like the roy moore case, whether it's a period of behavior that's been alleged over a very long. lack of time, it makes it very tough to go back and verify those statements. it can't happen overnight to figure it out.

>> it should be taken seriously, but it shouldn't be tried, as you both know, and the court of public opinion. i think we insult the public frankly when television pundits where the media decides in general that it can try this. all of a sudden now, this election should be overturned for an entire state. i think that's a very dangerous precedent to set and it's a massive public outrage if something like that were to happen. >> simply, we are going to have an election and alabama on december 12th, the people will be able to decide what they want to believe, what they don't want to believe, and i hope the senate seats the winner of that election, whoever it may be. >> kimberly: if there is an investigation, needs to continue of course.

we can also make some kind of distinguishing factors in terms of the spectrum of statements and also, sexual misconduct or sexual assault which is criminal in nature and should be prosecuted if appropriate. great to have you both here tonight. thank you so much. coming up, the mainstream media has been covering up democrat scandals for years. it will show you what new socking example next. don't go away. ♪ my name is jeff sheldon, and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t.

shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

>> kimberly: welcome back to this special edition of "hannity." the liberal mainstream media is once again colluding with the left. according to reports when the washington -- once a reporter goes rogue, it gives the abilit ability. "washington post" reporter gave a presentation at a secret california gathering. the publication claims to have proof. according to the agenda speaking right before was none other than

george soros. we we shout to "the washington post" for comments and were told, we have nothing more to share. joining me now it's reaction is the national spokesman for cora, todd starnes, niger ennis, and charlie kirk. the mainstream media often fails to cover scandals. do you think this report proves that it is more purposeful than ignorance of the scandal? >> absolutely. as a matter of fact, this is an example of not just a fake news, but propaganda news where you actually have a reporter from "the washington post" going into these secret meetings and gathering all this information. quite frankly, as a direct violation of the society of national journalists code of ethics. that is to avoid conflict of interests real or perceived and

avoid political and other outside activities on my compromise. >> this is quite disturbing. what were your initial thoughts? >> i was not surprised. it's actually deadly serious because he's not only the foundation, if you will of every left-wing supporter and politician from camilla harris to former president obama, but he also has an international network that he funds to openly undermine governments and counter policies. one of the scandals i hope is investigated is something that six u.s. senators have been

asked to look into which is how our government is funding ngos that are tied and actually contradicting u.s. foreign policy in places such as macedonia or zimbabwe. "the washington post" is in bed with these folks, it makes me a little concerned. i'm not all that surprised though. >> george soros is a big problem, but just behind him, there is a new richest man, he's with $100 million. he conveniently owns "the washington post." in fact, he acquired it last year. right after donald trump's surprise victory, he hired many journalists and reporters who went all over washington to try to find evidence of collusion.

"the washington post" was one of the most well read newspapers in the country has now become a political arm of the leftist causes. they invited him on the front and center stage in this secret meeting, but it's important to remember, they are right there together. >> kimberly: he become increasingly more dangerous. certainly his financial ability to influence american journalis journalism. >> absolutely. consider what happened here. you have a reporter who was assigned to cover president trump strategizing with these progressives and leftists. "the washington post" tells us we don't know anything about it. instead of being horrified and embarrassed at the fact that one of their reporters was demonstrating a clear bias by attending that meeting. >> kimberly: seemingly no repercussions whatsoever.

looking the other way at the situation instead of actually engaging in journalistic ethics and following through and providing some kind of accountability. >> could you imagine what would happen if some fox news reporter or "wall street journal" reporter had ties? this would be at the top of 60 minutes and on the top page of "the new york times" ." the silence on the left is deafening with this conspiracy. there is one thing that i'm hoping that the next 3-7 years of president trump's administration, that he cleans out the cobwebs of this international network. it's not just george soros. it's other billionaires that we don't hear from that are behind this international effort to undermine and contradict u.s.

foreign policy. >> kimberly: far-reaching implications and unbelievably inappropriate, the levels of impropriety. what do you do about this in terms of trying to do something, do you have some thoughts about a plan to try to investigate this? >> there should be some accountability and ethics and it should start with the general opening up an investigation into george soros' nonprofit organization which he just transferred $15 billion in two. there is good evidence to show that george soros has been instrumental in funding left-wing groups like black lives matter and nt for which are now being investigated by the fbi. what can be done, we need to get

the attorney general involved and see if there's any mischief in these domestic terror groups, but even more than that, we have to expose how the left have become funded by these alien errors. >> kimberly: the implications are so far reached. you look back at the campaign and the protesters and what was going on, they're really trying to stifle democracy in the election process. now there are very widely read and available newspapers like an impact not just american journalism, the truth, the facts like it out there, but also implications of foreign domestic policy. >> what we've seen here is clear evidence of collusion as not just "the washington post." remember back in the campaign when you had cnn asking the dnc

to go over and debate questions when you had donna brazile turning over the questions to hillary clinton's campaign. again, this is a very serious issue and it's important for all of the viewers to understand they need to be news consumers, they need to be good stewards of where they get their news and it's important for all of us to understand what's really going on here. >> kimberly: is important to make sure that they're actually getting the truth and reading multiple sources, not just one. follow the money. look to see who is behind it. who is funding this and who is trying to your mind? >> that's exactly right prayed the leftist trying to say conservatives is the party of the rich. 8 out of 10 wealthy americans voted for hillary. the left has really been funded by these people who want to create a government and not see america continue in

international dominance of fantasy stabilize capitalism as we know it. this is very, very dangerous, these are people who do not share our values and other they have a limited amount of money, they have unlimited amount of power which is what the left wants. the viewers need to continue to pursue good channels such as fox and read the most regional and stay away from these new sources that are being funded by people who do not share our values and want to see america succeed. >> kimberly: chili beans of a great point, but just the influence and the intention to basically mind control people by putting forth this propaganda and pretending, parlaying it as journalists and following ethical standards, thus the real problem that they took it this far. >> it's a real crisis and it's a generational crisis because the impact of this propaganda that you speak of that's on college campuses all across the country. you have generations of young

minds being poisoned. we have an opportunity with this president in office, the attorney general really needs to investigate this and i hope that tillerson will take that letter from six united state senators that they need to stop funding these far left-wing groups that are often violent and kind of the foreign version of these groups that we spoke of earlier. we have the opportunity to break this network up as quickly as we possibly can. >> kimberly: final thoughts. >> and snub covering these big issues, we have cnn who's out there suggesting that cyr and sanders make baking a peak on pie for thanksgiving. >> kimberly: i don't fake baking pies. thank you so much for being with us tonight. coming up, another nfl player

kneels during the national anthem yesterday. we are going to have president trump's response and more as this special edition of "hannity" continues. stay with us. ♪ (vo) take home something in a helzberg diamonds box for $999 or more, and you also take home an xbox one s, with a terrific bundle! now, that's thinking outside the box! at helzberg diamonds. while supplies last.

>> kimberly: welcome back to this special edition of "hannity." an american tradition is to watch football on thanks giving day, but one player chose to bring politics into the game. as you can see, olivier vernon for the new york giants took a knee during the national anthem, something he's been doing for several games now. president trump responded on twitter saying "can you believe that the disrespect for our country, or fly, or anthem continues without penalty to the

players. the commissioner has lost control of the hemorrhaging league. players are the boss." earlier this week, the president called out the nfl. he tweeted "the nfl is now thinking about a new idea, keeping teams in the locker room during the national anthem. that's almost as bad as kneeling. when will the highly paid commissioner finally get tough and smart? this issue is killing her league." joining us now with reaction is fox news contributor, robert jeffress and fox news contributor david webb. david, i'll begin with you. it is us the right move for the president to continue to call out the nfl, call at the players, call out the commissioner for their unpatriotic actions? >> it absolutely is. the president is winning on the issue. cultural americans and see the anthem and the flag is one. we stand for the anthem, we face the flag once flown for those men and women.

the subjective ideas around his tweeting is just that. the nfl is paying another price. we've done the business many times over the years. the nfl is an image and advertising which means as you look at playoff numbers, you look at sales, you look at cost costs, or losing their business. the players are affecting their business and the ignorance and the uninformed part of this. march on lynch, he stand for the mexican anthem. if you take him out of the celebrity bubble and he is arrested in mexico, he will be treated significantly differently than he would as a celebrity. two of those and if all players, i've so this for weeks on my show and i'll say it again. if you really want to go back to colin kaepernick, and you really want to process police brutality as you see it, then turn around and take any in front of a police officer, not to the flag in the anthem.

>> kimberly: there is such a disconnect in terms of messaging here and these unpatriotic displays. the viewers don't like it, ratings are sliding, all of the above. it's more like grandstanding. >> i think it is and i think there's a bigger issue here. whether it's calling out levar ball is the president and earlier this week and now calling out the nfl, i think president trump is touching on a very important issue in america right now and that's a lack of gratitude. these nfl players ought to be thinking god every day that they live in a country not only where they can earn millions of dollars every year, but they can disrespect our flag without being thrown in prison or worse as they would if they lived in china or north korea. contrary to what the left would tell you, this is not a racial issue. this is a grateful issue. it's an issue i'm glad the

president is hitting head on. the fact is that if all americans were grateful for the good things god and others have done for us, i think you would see a lot of the negativity in our country dissipate overnight. i think our president is showing great moral leadership on this topic. >> kimberly: in terms of being a nation that is grateful, grateful for military service for those that have shed blood to be able to protect our rights to express ourselves and terms of freedom of expression, first amendment rights, there is a way to do it that is respectful like you discussed versus doing this behavior. it doesn't make any logical or coherent sense. i don't think they even understand what messages behind this. >> their right to do this was never in question, the responsibility to do it on the job which is affecting the league, but there is also something else.

this flag and what it stands for, greater than the cloth is printed on. it stands for the very reason they can do this, so they are ungrateful. i have to say this about levar ball. i tweeted this out last week. shoplifting a pair of sunglasses and no big thing, is it okay if we shoplift the big bowler shoes because is no big thing? there uninformed, there ungrateful. i understand that there is a real issue of brutality. there is an effective way to deal with that issue. we need to deal with bad shoots, but we need to respect we have in this country. >> kimberly: what about people who criticize the president of the united states saying he shouldn't get involved in this? i think it shows creativeness and transparency that he's

willing to take a stand, not necessarily for what's popular to get involved, but speaking as a businessman at a patriot and a commander in chief, let's all try to be a little more graceful and responsible for our behavior and by the way, the failure contract that you signed and agreed to to be able to go and play the game that you are paired very well and blessed to be able to go out and excel in the field. >> i laughed. i laugh every time i hear the president's critics say this is it normal for a president to weigh in on issues like this. they don't get it. that's why he's president because he does weigh in on issues and people are tired of normal, they want somebody who will deal with it. that's why he got elected and i predict that's why he will get reelected. people like this kind of president. >> kimberly: let's talk about the attitude in the country right now. it seems like every time we talk about this issue, some of the players are not even correctly

articulating what the original message is, it becomes a different kind of protest. why are they kneeling, if you ask some of them, it's police brutality, then its equal rights and it's constantly changing. >> there uninformed and this is the probably have in this country. we have a lot of people who are uninformed or at least not even tactical and what they're doing. if your causes police brutality, do thing about it. kneeling on a sunday and your mansion is not effective. >> kimberly: how about going to a community outreach program or working? >> in chicago, there were over six murders. go to these towns and cities. it's not racial, it's economics. uplift as many people as you can, go back and help the other others. >> kimberly: go ahead. >> i was going to say. i have a brother who is a 30-year veteran of the police department. i know police brutality is real,

but it's also very rare. if the exception, not the rule. we have to celebrate what our police do positively. i agree with david. if they are really sincere about this, what they ought to do is say and protest, i'm not going to take my salary for the next six months until we fight injustice. >> kimberly: that's so true. put their money where their mouth is. what's wrong with that idea? >> because is not about action. it's trendy, it's against president trump, it's all the things -- if they want to do the real work, i be doing the real work in these communities for years. help each other and help these families, that's what we need to do in america. that's the american family, is not black or white. our culture is strong. when we are strong, the world is better off. >> kimberly: absolutely. i love your comments about gratitude and how important it is to have in life and to appreciate the blessings that you have and if you want to

disagree or express an opinion, there are so many beatable ways to get involved to make a difference and make an impact versus being a showman to get more attention. >> there is an yesterday on fox, i issued what i call the gratitude challenge to all americans and that is make a list of three things were grateful for, good things in your life and once a day, thank god for those three things for the next 30 days and see if your attitude doesn't change dramatically. that would bring up a lot of healing to our nation if we could do that. >> kimberly: we are very grateful to have you with us tonight. always a pleasure. will have more of a special edition of "hannity" right after the break, don't go away. ♪

♪ >> welcome back to the special edition of hannity. that's all the time we have tonight. sean will be back monday. i hope you had a lovely thanksgiving. and please have a great weekend.

♪ >> jesse: good evening, everybody. i am jesse watters' in for laura ingraham for the ingraham "the ingraham angle". yesterday on thanksgiving day, democrat senator al frankin issued another apology in the midst of more allegations of sexual misconduct. t two anonymous women said he grabbed their back sides. after saying he didn't release the incident.