monday. smugness , have a great weekend. >> sean: welcome to hannity. tonight a bombshell report from the hill's john solomon and allison c-span, now according to their lisa bloom secured a cash payment interest for a trump accuser and attempt to arrange huge compensation for another potential accuser just days h before the election in 2016. this entire story is shocking. tonight we have very a serious question why would she do this to make is a is a dirty politics, is it undermined to destroy president trump's campaign, and will bloom's actions make it harder for all the real victims of sexual

misconduct to come forward in the future. we will cover all of that and more into nights breaking news opening monologue. john solomon's exclusive report it's sitting check waves all across the country tonight. here's the headline. exclusive, prominent lawyers sought, donor cash for two trump accusers. from the report are beyond stunning. well-known, women's rights attorney, lisa bloom, attempted to arrangege cash compensation from donors and media outlets for women, who came forward for women who are considering coming forward with allegations of sexual misconduct against donald trump in the lead up to the election. "the hill" is exploding lisa bloom wanted women to pay her commissions as high as 33% as she was able to sell their stories to media outlets. in a statement to "the hill,"nd bloom said she did secure and attempted to secure these kind of payments.

bloom noted, obtaining money was not part of an effort to pressure women to speak out with accusations. now bloom also told "the hill," the money was to use to relocate clients if they do not feel saf safe. bloom said, she did not contact hillary clinton or her campaign, but bloom did not want to tell the hill, of possible misdemeanor case and, had with super pacs tied to hillary clinton. and finally, she added, she never encouraged the women featured in the "the hill" article to say things they do not wantn to be true, and the women confirm that. we also reach out to bloom for comment, and she responded to our request by attacking john solomon and that it is about a right-wing smear. bloom confirmed all the major parts of this breaking story. this includes, bloom securing money for tropic user.

she gives donald trump and filed a lawsuit against them in 1997. shesh got that lawsuit. this is what "the hill" is reporting, which she both confirmed. now she says, that in fact, she did not initially ask bloom for money, even though her business, she claimed, was suffering from stories about her accusations. at some point, later in the relationship, bloomio secured wt "the hill" says, a small payment from licensing photos to news outlets. and bloomom also said she has a golf on the page. "the hill" is reporting that bloom wanted hearth to have 8:30 $8,000 payment to help her pay off her mortgage. jill hearth did tell "the hill," takingng the money did not affet the veracity. we did reach out to jill hearth, she did not answer our request. "the hill" also spoke to another woman, pay close attention. she chooses to be anonymous.

this woman, told "the hill"'s john solomon that she is a friend of jill and was pressed by lisa bloom to go public with her accusations of sexual misconduct against donald trump from the 1990s. before we get into those detail details, it is importantha to know, this woman supported trump in 2016 and his friends with people close to the president including one of his attorneys. the woman stressed to "the hill," nobody connected to the president to reveal details with with's before. she spoke out against lisa bloom, she was disgusted by the fact that bloom served as harvey weinstein's attorney when the sexual l, sexual misconduct investigation. with the dash she brought emails, that lisa bloom had a very strong anti-trump bias. she also revealed to "the hill,"

bloom had a deadline for her to speak out before the 2016 election per the timeline proves this. the woman also detail to "the hill," bloom offered her $10,000 in the form of a donation to a favored church. this is where it gets interesting. as the election got closer and closer and closer, and the poles got tighter and tighter, bloom increased the offer from 10,000 to $50,000 interpersonal payment. and then went to $100,000. and then went to $200,000. and then two days, november 6, 2016, 2 days before the election, it went $750,000. what this means is, lisa bloom was offering a fortune. right before you, the american people, you were going to choose who the next american prison was going to be. the woman said to the hill, she decided, how much money would he offered indian? bloom claims, the unnamed woman as for a one point come at $2.

but bloom said, that was a nonstarter. here'sno the timeline of how all that played out. pay close attention. she contacted the woman's friend, butt the friend did not put the woman on the phone come up she was in hospital bed. then took a flight in a attempt to see the woman. all the way to virginia from california. and then the next day, bloom was able to connect to the woman. and then bloom sent this text message. here's what is quoted in the "the hill" report. i am confused, because you sent me so many nice text wednesday night after my other client wasted so much of my time and canceled the press conference they texted on november 5th 2016, that meant a lot to me. thursday, you said, you wanted to do this if you could be protected and relocated. i begged you not to jerk me around after what had just gone through. a little later she added another text. you treated me very poorly. i have treated you with great

respect as much as humanly possible. i've not made a dime off your case, and i've devoted a great deal of time. it does not matter. i have -- i could have done so much, but you cannot stick to your word, even when you swear you will. two days before the election, november 6, when the woman left the hospital, she agreed to sit down with bloom in a hotel room, and that is where according to the woman, two days before the election, bloom offered the whopping sum of $750,000. the woman still declined to take it. to all of us, this whole thing is beyond stunning. what if it had happened? logical person can only conclude that this was about politics or lisa bloom at least. imagine for a second, it destroyed came out on november the sixth, right before the election? would bloom have acknowledged that this woman received all that money to tell her story? i doubt it. how would any campaign be able

to deal with that, and at least have a chance to make their case? talk about november surprises. this is one that would be for the record books. i want to make one thing clear. as you know if you watch this program, regularly, sexual misconduct and abuse, is a widespread problem in this country. we know it is true. i am the father of a daughter. i have sisters. it scares me. it is morally repugnant when it happens, it needs to stop. it has no place in our society. we have said that repeatedly. months on the show. victims of sexual misconduct deserve toto be believed. and also as we have been saying for months, any person that is accused of this type of behavior and they deny it, they too deserve the presumption of innocence. i have said that in the case of democrats and republicans. numerous examples that prove people cannot rush to judgment, because sometimes innocent people are hurt, because the allegations are flat out. example in point.

the duke lacrosse case, those innocent. having their lives ruined. richard in atlanta, accused of being the 1996 atlanta olympic bomber. he did not do it. ferguson, missouri, michael brown. the mantra, hands up, do not iu, that was a lie. freddy gray and baltimore, the media told you, those cops would be convicted, and none of them were. what lisa bloom or did or attempted to do. bloom's claims to be a champion of women's rights, voice to the voices, but to "the hill," she did secure a cash payment from speech by seven to pay off the mortgage, and another had huge a payment from a different woman. this is the same donald trump that bloom had hatred for an reporting in "the hill." all this raises very serious questions. not only about lisa bloom and her motivations, but also other

issues, how will the public to with ischemic is lisa bloom interested in helping women here or was the real goal, as you can see to the timeline and the money going up and up and up, and a push to the election, was a spot stopping donald trump from winning the white house? why was bloom in contact with donors? what donors? who are they? with a tide in any way to hillary clinton? these accusations are so serious, this should all be above politics. we asked legal analyst gregg jarrett about all of this, and here's what he told us. while it is not illegal to ask someone to donate money for a person to tell a story, it can be a crime if that money is intended to influence someone to lie in a court proceeding. a raises another question.he lisa bloom says, she vented these women appeared my question, okay, how carefully did you bet them? shows the information. we like to see the vetting, the dates, the times, specific

examples. the story is huge. it is a much larger pattern of attacks against the president. we have told you about destroyed trump forces to destroy this president. he's also been reporting, unlike the rest of the "destroyed trump media" trying to take down the president. the surveillance, unmasking of trump and associates by the obama administration. we have the clinton bought and paid for, fake news, russian propaganda salacious dossier. they wanted that to be used to influence the election. and this week, fox news obtained the anti-trump text messages between peter strzok and his girlfriend, lisa page, discussing the insurance policy against donald trump winning the election. what was the insurance policy? then you have the special counsel, robert mueller's team. they had been exposed and

corrupted, abusively by us. incapable of conducting a fair investigation. the list goes on and on. and "the hill"'s article raises more questions for joining us now, the journalist who worked hard, broke the story, wide-open from "the hill," john solomon. let's go through the step by step.e you see the timeline from october 14th to make november 6. in the pressure that being brought to bear on this woman to go forward becomes astronomical the payment gets astronomically high. walk us through it. >>hr i never thought i would lie today as a reporter when we are talking about the same personal decision of women to possibly come forward with allegations of sexual harassment or assault and it be turned into a game of montyht hall appeared behind her one, week or month before, i have $10,000 for your church. closer to the election, i $50,000 for you. behind or three, i have 100,000.

200,000 behind door four. five, $750,000. it is an extraordinary thing. you see this woman struggling. she is personal thing she wants to worry about, and security of her daughter, and the more of that up, the more that she has to struggle with the decision appeared take the money and do what i think is best? it is and is furnished for a come i never thought we would live to see the day, were money was being thrown around like it was some sort of dealmaking. >> sean: we also note lisa bloom has huge bias here. it seems it could have been -- it could have unfolded before the country. let's say $750,000 was paid to this woman. how does anybody -- how does the public absorb this, vet this, and the public did not know about the payments.

>> it's a great question. since the story broke, there is a question, if the donor's intention, given this money to help the woman also in hopes of influencing the election, it might've been considered under the jurisdiction of campaign donation. as a whole another angle to this that we will have to report out and talk to lawyers and try to understand. there is no doubt the election was ati deadline given to the women. that is not in dispute. if the donor's intention, they have been told this may help the election if you help these women comeom forward, it could raise election issues that have not been raised in the public. >> sean: let me go down this road. this is very, very important. i do not know what the answer is. if this had happened in the public did not know about the payment, something like this in my mind having followed election my whole adult life changed the result of the r election. that is how profound this is. that is why you do not have an

opportunity to vent an accusation like this two days before an election, do you? >> no, that's a good point. remember, one of the women who did come forward, she did get something of value. she got her mortgage paid off. money did change has been something did a value occur to one of the accusers. i can take tonight, shawn, i'm walking on this. b this may not be the only path of request for money. there appears to be another line where an accuser may have saw a job or an investment frome. donald trump before their story of sexual harassment became public. we aretme continuing to date, bt the money was here, you have to start look if it happened in other places as well. some of our reporting indicates, and people tune into "the hill" the next couple days, they may learn more information. >> sean: y you brought up a lot about the super pacs associated in favor of hillary clinton. and then an outright denial, wouldn't answer the question that she had talked to them. we have noted with this money came from. >>e she is clear, do not talk to

hillary clinton campaign, didn't talk to the democrats, national media. the t text messages, and they sy she did. the woman who did not come forward, but considering the offer side, we heard that if wef help hillary clinton, there might be something for us. can you explain if the super pacs can help us, and shes said, i just talked to the, they're not willing to pay right now. i can tell your story. that is another part of the clinton -- >> sean: did she say she never does she did this pro bono. >> she always did, and you learn what pro bono really meant, i get 33% commission if i sell your story to the media, and you begin to think, a woman, her very painful story and concerns about their own well-being and doing this. it's a commodity. it is a commodity being sold. >> sean: i have heard all these rumors. lot of people have about tapes. have you heard anything aboutin that, in my last question, what is next as this story ---- mores

coming. >> i cannot corroborate any of the rumors. right now, where with a very strong body of evidence. the text messages and the winning with documents, and lisa bloom own admission. >> sean: how many text messages, emails to have total? will you release some some peoplele can read a? >> we have the we will be reporting more on them as time goes on. >> sean: unbelievable story,jo john solomon. we appreciate it. when wee come back, more reactin to this explosive story by john solomon, and the latest, will talk to president trump's attorney, jay sekulow, about this. jim comey, peter strzok, and hillary clinton and how that can bell untangled. hey. pass please. i'm here to fix the elevator. nothing's wrong with the elevator. right. but you want to fix it.

right. so who sent you? new guy. what new guy? watson. my analysis of sensor and maintenance data indicates elevator 3 will malfunction in 2 days. there you go. you still need a pass.

there you go. you won't see these folks they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale. go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. wifiso if you can't live without it...t it. why aren't you using this guy? it makes your wifi awesomely fast. no... still nope. now we're talking! it gets you wifi here, here, and here. it even lets you take a time out.

no! no! yes! yes, indeed. amazing speed, coverage and control. all with an xfi gateway. find your awesome, and change the way you wifi. ♪ el >> sean: welcome back toon "hannity," more reaction, the explosive report from "the hill," we have gregg jarrett, also contributor let me start with the panel here. you see the urgency, 10,000, 50,000. 100,000. in 200,000, 750,000.

as wee now count down to five, four, three, two days. until the election, what if it was paid? what impact could not possibly have on an election? what does it say if somebody decides to take money to come out with the story? how does the public to observe the? >> the question, attorneys cannot go solicit clients. this woman was a client. you cannot solicit them to be compensated for a possible lawsuit. these women were supposedly comingy out for this alleged harassment and pursue claims against the then president-elect, trunk. now the president. during an electric cycle, it does not make sense, sean, because it is unethical. we have restrictive rules off attorneys. to a point that, if you do pay ande, compensate people, there could be criminal repercussions.

i cannot quite understand why there was, first $10,000, $750,000. for the alleged victims. forr what? she claims it was for compensation for security, but the reality is, you cannot ensure your client with any money. >> sean: jessica, what is your reaction? >> i think it is a lisa bloom problem, for sure. i know we talked a lot about the #metooprocessmovement.it itisnotallofthat. when women are treated horribly, i want the people that are responsible held accountable. when you see the money rising and urgency in a political agenda behind us, that should scare every single person that we think whatever running for office.

wouldn't you agree? >> absolutely. there is a fake complaint against him, where hee was doing the research and show -- he would look at the uva, lacrosse, -- >> there's not a hundred thousands of women who have legitimate claims. i think lisa bloom -- >> sean: i'm not -- i'm going to tammy bruce. >> is a problem that we have to have this conversation. for me, it is the veracity of the women that very often is questioned about what they want what their agenda is. and what their motives are. when you have something thiss corrupt going on, it hurts women who havema legitimate cases, because it is setting the stereotype right in front of everybody. and every single level. even though you may have a legitimate claim, you suddenly do have to wonder when it comes to motive, what is someone willing to say for three quarters of a million dollars. can you trust a woman that she is saying. did that really happen to her?

>> sean: can you answer your own question? >> women are always accused of this. it is unique when you have someone who like the weinsteinan case, allege that she was offered money to retract her accusation. when you have something like this, since the forefront. it will reinforce the negative for women, who have every right to be heard, but this is why this exists. >> it doesn't discredit all of the women. you even have to say that, it puts a shadow over every single one of them. >> sean: -- >> cast a shadow. >> she decides, the woman is in the hospital, it is not responding to her text,os lisa bloom flies to the west coast. and then the exchange takes desk you're confused, because so many nights, text wednesday night after my other client wasted so much of my time and cancel the

press conference.ll she says, november 5th, 3 days now out of the election. that meant a lot to meet thursday. youou said, you wanted to do th. if you can be protected, reeked located. i begged you not to jerk me around after what had just got to. then she adds, you've treated me very poorly. i have treated you with great respect. as much as humanly possible. i have not made a dime off your case, and i've devoted a great deal of time. it doesn't matter. i could have done so much for you. if you can't even stick to your word, you sway you will. gregg jarrett? >> she n does not come out welln this. she is driven by political elements to bring down trump and to make a buck off the whole thing.. look. it is not a legal for a donor to pay someone to tell the truth. if the intent of the donor is to get a witness to lie or embellish a story to a court case, like sexual misconduct. that would be perjury. >> sean: there's no evidence that they cared about veracity.

is a big difference between the tabloid newspaper, that payss fr stories, thehe way the public views them in terms of credibility versus a news organization which should not ever take money. i know they pay for pictures. backdoor way to pay people sometimes. it is really indifference. we know that these tablets pay. sometimes they are right, might not be. they do not have the same standards as a real nose organization. >> in the o.j. simpson murder case, fleeing the scene was never called to the witness stand, because she sold her story to the tabloids and prosecutors new should be shredded on the witness can. news organizations, it's even worse. the worst witness against lisa bloom is herer own client, who says, you just want me to bury trump. for what? for personal gain. greed. >> sean: i have exit questions from everybody.

for me, i believe this is going to have a profound impact on these issues moving forward. quickly, how big of an impact? >> big impact. it discredits the women who come forward and do not want to be paid.er this makes it seem like everybody is getting paid for a story, most of these womenon really were affected, and they do not want to be paid. i'm not talking about -- >> sean: what happens with democratic presidential candidate youik like? >> it would be just as terrible. >> sean: if the voting public is notg your money was paid, is that fair can make should to be a log and set? >> i do not write statutes. >> sean: when i do not ask them, should it be a lot? >> sounds like there should b be as much transparency as possibl possible. >> sean: in two days before an election,ra someone makes an allegation, does the public have a right to know in the case? >> i think the public has a right to know as much as possible. this is also just what we do know now. who knows what else was

occurring? if this was coming to the surface, you can imagine what the outburst would be under the tip. >> sean: two days before the election? >> it is unconscionable. all of the women represented by lisa bloom or trump accusers that had their credibility diminished if not absolutely ruined. >> i don't think the majority of americans, but people watching this will. >> sean: in the future, i agree with tammy. >> i guess i'm the odd man out. >> sean: jeff sessions said he is taking searcy the concerns being expressed from demoted doj official, "tucker carlson tonight" five, and a second special counsel. jay sekulow will weigh in on that. s up.coming ahead. ♪ ♪

>> live from america's headquarters. harth may be on the verge of his first major legislative victory. republicans in congress appear to have enough votes to pass a massive tax overhaul plan. marco rubio signed on after the child tax credit for working families has increased. bob corker says, he would vote yes as well after initially opposing the bill. the measure would drop the top tax rate for individuals from 39.6% down to 30 7%, and slashed by more than a third to 21%. it will add more than a trillion dollars to the nation's debt. it is an end of an era. american online pulling the plug on instant messenger. once again, a new wave of digital communication, aim has been replaced by new technologies. i am robert gray, now back to "hannity" ." ♪

>> sean: what you have to say as legal team calling for another special counsel? this one specifically about >> sean: 25, an official here with fusion gps and his wife working with fusion gps? would you consider such a counsel? >> we will take seriously the concerns that have been expressed. i would say to you, deputy, debbie rosenstein has testified beforeos the congress again just yesterday, and we want to be open with them. it >> sean: that was the attorney general jeff sessions earlier today. he will take seriously the calls for a counsel to investigate the doj and fusion gps. during is now, he is the head of the american center of law and justice and the president's counsel, jay sekulow. i want one on the dots to, fusion gps, he is meeting with

them, ohr, his wife worked with him, doing anti-trump research with the lead up to the campaign. what about james comey and peter strzok and lisa page, both anti-trump, pro-hillary. reopening the entire investigation, because they exonerated before they investigated, and i'm not talking about uranium one and surveillance and unmasking, jay. how about all of this needs to be investigated? >> up t the last you mentioned s something -- they're all serious, but the last one, the idea that it may well be that this.caoe put together by fusion gps and bruce ohr's wife, serving as the basis upon which a pfizer warrant. when they went in for the pfizer one, it was turned on. then they get it later. it was not based on this. and if it was based on this,

you're talking about the fruit of the poisonous tree. it is all an idea that that somehow could exist within our system of justice is astonishing. sean, you look at these interconnections, and this is really serious to the operation of justice. that is what is at stake. >> sean: it is possible that hillary clinton and then hillary clinton's campaign seize control ofdi the dnc according to donna brazile,e, she is bought d paid for, russian propaganda dossier, with all of the salacious details, that could have been used to issue a warrant against candidate trump, and his entire team. legally speaking if that happens, does that warrant any affirmation that they received under false pretenses? >> yes, if, in fact, when there are a lot of chatter about this,

if, in fact, the fisa warrants were on the unverified as james comey said, salacious dossier, no verification, nothing is correct. that f effect was the basis with fisa was issued, there is a constitutional issue, can the evidence derived from that fisa warned be admissible. the answer would be no. it does raise a very, very serious sector of constitution issues and procedure issues, and it puts -- this whole unmasking scandal is a scandal in and of itself.sp putting it in perspective, if it is based up the dossier, what have we come to? what is -- what has the court system allowed to get to? >> sean: do agree with my analysis on them a second or early may draft by james comey and alsod edited by speed peter

strzok. before theyn investigate, even talk to hillary, or witnesses that sounds to me like obstruction of justice. >> they granted him immunity into witnesses and exoneration letter was written before they interviewed the witnesses that were granted immunity. go figure that out. what prosecutor does i? and then if you look at the actual -- we broke this out, sean. if you look at what was drafted by james comey and his drive, and then was edited by peter a strzok and others, you look at things -- a big discussion, based upon this whole email situation coming to light, the server was not secure. it was located in a townhouse in colorado. in james comey's original draft when talking about the t seriousness, this is especially concerning, because all of these emails were housed on servers not supported by full-time security staff like those found at the department and agencies of the united states government. that was omitted in the final report.

he wrote it, and then somebody took that out. that was the basis plan this whole matter started in the first place. >> sean: let me go back to our top story. we now have john solomon's explosive report. what we are seen, and intensity and financial reward going up and up starting in october. first, 10,000 hours, $50,000, d $100,000, $200,000 coming two days before thebe election, $750,000. that we do not know where the money came from. being offered to a woman in exchange for her story about donald trump. if that story can come out, i doubt we would have known it was paid for. we did not know anyone was being paid up until today. you have to help me through this. what would that mean in terms of trying to influence the american people 48 hours before they go to the polls? >> look, you look at the entire

situation. you put all this into context. what was taking place here? you have campaigns -- it's a rough business. everybody understands that. what have going on in the john solomon piece in the "the hill," escalating value of the stories as election gets closer. in the de-escalation of the value and the election is over. you look at some of the trains of emails that cited, you see how this goes. it was interesting. the person offered the $750,000 as john reported did not take the money. spirit what if she did? the phony russian salacious lies, they're being paid for by hillary clinton preclusion. i have two days before the election, a massive sum of money for somebody to make an accusation. >> three quarters of a million dollars. what you have, sean, and you look at the whole process. you talk about the need for special counsel. look at all of this and what is

going on. you go back to the department of justice andho the fbi. like you, i have tremendous respect for the agents that put their lives on the line for us every school day. defending this country, defending our liberty, defending our freedom. i do not appreciate a department of justice that not only determines the case before the evidence came in, but was completely -- and it has become very clear here, and conflicted on multiple levels. i don't care if you're republican, democrat, independent. nobody in our constitutional republic should take that as okay. it is not okay. i think they have a big job, chris wray. you talk about the deep state, you do not have to dig so deep, is right at that service, leadership issues and general sessionsay said, they are taking this issue seriously with a special counsel. you know what? there is a process they go through. they need to go through that

process and evaluate a special counsel. >> sean: a jay sekulow, thank you. when we come back, president trump earlier today spoke at the fbi national academy. what he had to say. we will get reaction. sebastian gorka, sarah carter, and in a message for s you. our loyal viewers. straight ahead. nothing's wrong with the elevator. right. but you want to fix it. right. so who sent you? new guy. what new guy? watson. my analysis of sensor and maintenance data indicates elevator 3 will malfunction in 2 days. there you go. you still need a pass.

there you go. why did you take credit card debt on? second kid. private school. medical bills. moving costs. solid ground. a personal loan from sofi is a smart way to consolidate credit card debt. certain borrowers cut their credit card interest rates 42% and increased credit scores 17 points on average. borrow up to $100,000 with low rates and no hidden fees. find your rate in just two minutes, and take on your debt at sofi.com.

♪ >> it is a shame what is happening to the fbi. we will rebuild the fbi. it will be bigger and better than ever. it is very sad when you look at those documents, how they have done that is really, really disgraceful. you have a lot of very angry people. it is a very sad thing to watch. i will tell you that. i am going today on behalf of the fbi. their new building, but everybody, not me, everybody, the level of anger with what they have been witnessing with respect to the fbi is certainly very sad. >> sean: that was the president earlier today before he departed for the fbi national academy in quantico, virginia, where he spoke at a graduation ceremony for law enforcement for officials before the united states of america and around the world. the president rightfully upset with some of the blatant bias shown by top ranking officials. not rank-and-file, at the fbi

and doj. we have said this many times. we do have great respect for those men and women at law enforcement in our country, who save us every day and put the lives on the line. we know the president feels the same way. here's what he said earlier today. >> it is an honor to stand here today with the incredible mene. and women of law enforcement. i am here, not only to congratulate you, but to honor you for your courage and for your devotion. i want you to know that with me as your president, america's police will have a y true friend and loyal champion at the white house. more loyal than anyone else can behave. >> sean: reaction, fox news national security strategist, former deputy assistant to the present, sebastian gorka and investigative reporter, sarah carter. it is so sad, because you have

one bad cop, people want to eat -- to be forget about the 99.9%? same at the fbi same with intelligence officials. those that work hard to protect us come up the lives on the line every day, sarah, but when you have the head of the fbi, james comey, working with peter strzok, and they are writing an exoneration of political intent before they do their investigation. that is not equal justice under the law. peter s strzok thinks god appointed him to save the country, and they are building insurance policies in case trump wins, this is corruption. i think at the highest level we have ever seen. your reaction? >> i have talked to field agents today. a number of field agents. retired fbi agents, and at the same sentiment as harth. people -- we've seen on the seventh floor. he listens over and over again.

you know see this type of behavior withinh the fbi.av we just told blaine. you know, sean, what was even more interesting to me, they were telling me, they were at an event, all these field agents, they said, everybody was worried about russia collusion with tom. instead, fbi collusion with clinton. that is how they are feeling. >> sean: sebastian gorka, i know how you feel about law enforcement. we all feel the same way. this is real collusion. this is real corruption. there is no other way to describe what comey and peter strzok did. the fix was in. the fix was in months before he did his investigation. to me, if i am james comey tonight, i am peter strzok tonight, i am thinking, i have to hire the best lawyers d.c. has. >> sean, sarah is absolutely right. my personal experience, i have worked closely with thousands of agents and analyst.

i was at the white house with the christmas celebration. soso wasn't of the agent from tw fbi had at least 20, 25 years in. he recognized me and came up to me and he said, the bureau's reputation is shocked. it's not because of the people who are protecting us on the streets, the terrorism task forces, it's because of a handful of bad apples, bent cops corrupt cops. sean, the saddest thing is, regain the documents now. i've seen emails of collusion in the fbi to protect hillary clinton come up because i think the next president. i am seen names of agents i highly respected and have worked with, who once they got to the seventh floor, sean, that is it under the obama administration, they became political hacks. this could take years to rebuild the fbi. the president said it today. he will rebuild it, and he canks rebuild it. >> sean: it needs to be

rebuild. the top people, formal obama people within the intelligence community, before this is all said and done, i believe this house of cards falls. your story yesterday about reverse targeting come of the misuse of the powerful tools of intelligences that we give the intelligence community, that you reported, sarah, that does not even get into the dossier issue. bought and paid for by hillary, salacious russian began to lyse do influence an election. that does not get into the uranium one deal. i am not sure how we entangle all this. your thoughts? >> the best way to do that, one step at a time. one story at a time, sean. one investigation at a time. that is what we have done over the past year, and that is why we see this yarn unraveling, peeling back the onion as you always say. one layer at a time. and now, you brought up the dossier. such a great point. we have seen now, ohr's wife was

hired by fusing gpssi to help wh this dossier -- it's an incredible step. we would have never discovered this had we not found it one sporadic time. and i think we need to continue that, the factual, find those facts, present them so we can clean up our system. thisisbe is still the greatest country on earth. wen still have -- >> sean: intelligence misuse, people are paying people for stories. dossier from russia being used, the misuse of intelligence. it is literally -- we are more with the bribery and kickbacks, extortion, money laundering, 28% of our uranium is given away. none of this comes to full resolution, sebastian gorka. >> it well. the story that is coming out thanks to sarah and john and you, sean.

>> sean: and you. >> i am not doing the heavy lifting. sarah is right. she stole my thunder. we are the greatest nation on god's earth. we are also the most powerful earth.on god's you stop tohen weaponize law enforcement, you start to political weaponize like john brennan, the last administration, eric holder, is more dangerous than anything you can imagine. and that is why, we have to step in now, people have to be investigated and prosecuted. splenda separates us from a police state. we do not get these issues resolved, and the deep state, illegally surveilling americans. we shred the fourth amendment protections for the constitution. we will lose the country. this is not a game we are talking about. these are severe violations of law, and it all needs to come to a head. we can become a big announcement

about the show and it evolves you. please stick around talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424.

you won't see these folks they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office?

stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale. go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

>> sean: welcome back to "hannity," does all the time we have. as always, thank you for being with us. before you go, i want to thank all of you, who tune into the show every night and watch at home. when we moved back to our 9:00 slot, oh, "hannity" is dead me. thank you for the entire year, 10:00 and 9:00 , became the mostt dead watch in 2017. total audience with everything people talk about. you made that happen. your support, we cannot put a value want to. you got us the honor of being with us every night. i want to thank you and wish you a merry christmas, happy new year. there's a lot of breaking news, we will you be back. we have judged an, others m filling in. we hope you have a merry christmas, happy hanukkah. and we will be refreshed and ready to go.

set your dvr. never miss an episode. have a wonderful holiday. we will see you in the new year. thank you. ♪ isode. have a wonderful holiday. we will see you in the new year. thanks for being with us. ♪ ♪ >> laura: welcome to the ingraham angle from washington. a huge show tonight. lots of news breaking. a bombshell report to share with you. a famous lawyer was soliciting money to pay women making sexual misconduct allegations against candidate donald trump during the 2016 campaign. getting paid to accuse the candidate. you don't think that's an incentive to fabricate stories? we'll discuss it all with alan dershowitz. i will also talk to white house press secretary sarah sanders about the constant barrage of media attacks. some against her personally and the president. but, first, the democrats me