i hate to add, that is not again, but things can change. interested in getting out of town for christmas and staying through christmas and trying to sort things out when they can do so in january. "the five" is now. ♪ >> jesse: hello, everybody. i am jesse watters with kimberly guilfoyle, brian kilmeade, kimberly guilfoyle, -- this is "the five" ." barely dry on the new sweeping tax bill and congress is knee-deep in another fight. time to invert a government shutdown this weekend. president trump thinks democrats are trying to force them to take attention away from the tax victory. house democrats want to shut down for the holidays in order to distract from the very popular just past pass cut. house republicans do not let

this happen, passing the cr today and keeping our government open. nancy pelosi voted no, unless the democratic priorities are addressed. >> we have problems with this bill. we do see it as an opportunity for them to at least allow a vote. at least allow a vote on dreamers, which we think that we would win. hopefully we have made some progress in the thinking as to the urgency of it. speak to the house is nearly at a short-term spending bill, the first step in a shut down at midnight tomorrow. the senate still must vote. so, dana, do democrats have any leverage at all or not? >> dana: not much, know when you have majorities with the republicans able to pass it in the house. i think that it is going to pass in the senate. i do not think that this is a great way to govern, we go through this quite often. but you have a spending bill and the game of chicken for who will be blamed for the government shutdown. i do not think that that will happen. i think that they are able to

get it done, the ticking point for the democrats with the dreamer issue. they already conceded that they will have to deal with that in the new year. an impact, president trump's deadline was not until march. they have some time. >> jesse: he extended the deadline for the dreamers. they will put that into the immigration overall. okay, so, if they do shut it down which they will not, but if they do, brian, somehow, will it be the democratic shutdown, because always republicans get blamed >> brian: because they are in the majority. i heard nancy pelosi say that we do not have the power and the presidency, how could you blame me? which is true, if they got on the same page there would be no problem. it's looking until what? january 19th, the longer they could do that, you are giving leadership the chance to tell everybody where they spend as opposed to membership. so why can't i get everything in order starting may be before january 19th to start putting things through the committee

process and deciding how we are going to spend rather than wait till the last minute and give it to mitch mcconnell and paul ryan. >> kimberly: and make them eat it. >> jesse: why can't the democrats let the tax code to marinate and let trump take a victory lap? why do they have to rein on his parade into the shutdown? it is so mean of them. >> kimberly: mean-spirited and the time of christmas giving. it does not make a lot of sense. they do not want to acknowledge the specifics, they are going to do what they can and the politics involved here. it is political back and forth, and they are not going to let him have this. why would they want that? they want to say that it is terrible and something that is not good for the country. ultimately, i would agree with you guys that i do not think they will shut it down. can you imagine? let's shut it down over the holiday? >> jesse: we have to stay until christmas eve. >> kimberly: let's count on that not happening. >> jesse: they are trying to divert attention from all the corporate tax cuts were going to

go to the fat cat ceos, instead of a bunch of companies announced that they will give bonus checks to a lot of their employees. that does not really have anything to do with what to the democrats were telling us was going to happen. >> juan: what are you talking about? that is exactly what the democrat said. >> jesse: with the democrat said that they were going to give money back to the workers? that is the opposite of what they said. >> juan: i'm going to finish the point, and then you can start with the nonsense. >> jesse: that was true. >> juan: what you see today is that a tong of the company say because of the tax cuts will which match which will enrich our tax errors, this will be a bonus to a lot of people. it is the results of the fact that these companies made out like bandits for the tax deal. that is a fact. >> jesse: you are against people getting thousand dollar bonuses? facebook.com/seanhannity no, i am all for it, don't be foolish and mistake what is happening here, you have that the very rich got richer and

they say, here's a little bit for you, why don't you take thi this -- >> jesse: $1000 is not a little bit. >> juan: it remains unpopular, if it comes to a shut down right now, the democrats have the upper hand. why do i say that? because the democrats have public opinion on their side. you have republicans who say, let's pump up military spending and the deficit and yet they don't ever say coming here as new sources of revenue in order to balance the budget. so who is responsible? >> jesse: there is no talk about cutting spending. if it is so sarah huckabee sanders talking about what is going to be on the agenda for 2018. >> we are working through some of the top priorities. you can expect welfare reform, infrastructure, immigration reform, all will be top of mind and something that will be looking at and talking about a lot over the course of next year. >> jesse: what do you think

the ingredients? >> dana: i think that all makes sense, your first year as president is when you can get the most on legislatively before you head into the midterm. with the three big things that the president can claim in the tax bill yesterday including the health care, individual mandate repeal, and to the anwar drilling, which is amazing for republicans to get through, where do you go from there? i think that they are going to have some messaging problems on welfare reform. if they can communicate it in a way that says, we are wanting to reform the system so that we can get people out of a poverty trap, and this is the way that we want to do that. that would be -- it is a good message when the problem is that you just gave corporations and wealthy people to money, and now you want to take benefits away from the poorest among us, how dare you. that is a tough messaging thing. i don't know how they do it. on infrastructure, the

democratics democrats really wanted. but that tax bill is supposed to be the new revenue to fund the new infrastructure plan. but because i got all screwed up and they basically had to pay for that on the individual side instead of the corporate side, now where are they going to get the money? they are floating the idea of a gas tax, do you want to hit them where it hurts? that is problematic for them, the last one in immigration reform, that is the most plausible and probably out of those three the most important. i think that they can actually do that before march. >> brian: it is immigration, no doubt about it. they are meeting in a bipartisan way on the side, very little pushback on chain immigration and very little pushback on the lottery system. so if you can give them border security or daca. there was republicans that say, amnesty, i don't care. go ahead, hit me with it. i will be the bad guy, paul ryan

you can be frustrated, mitch mcconnell, put up their hands. i will take the slings and arrows. what you brought up, not adding to the deficit, welfare reform will be a bad message even though it is necessary. all of these reforms should be necessary, but to go, okay, now that's going to welfare for the poor people even though you are performing at to make it a better country, it would be not a good time. it would be insane to do that right now. >> jesse: so kimberly, to the point, trade that offer the wall, do you think that is effective for the president? >> kimberly: you have to be able to negotiate and bring something to do table. you want them to increase border security, they are not going to do it unless you give them something that is meaningful. that is the price of doing business, whether it is politics or a financial industry, et cetera. he understands that. that is something that he would be open to any reasonable about, because of his heightened interest and desire to increase border security. a very big banner item that he promised during the campaign.

so he is going through the list, he is checking it twice. >> jesse: [laughs] >> kimberly: he will find out which democrats are not air nice. i just made that up. >> jesse: i love that. is there anything that you think is nice? >> juan: yes, immigration. i had the account on the hill, i think that the immigration argument has shifted after what we saw in virginia, even alabama for those issues were front and center and people were like, no, that is not going to push me over the line. republican candidates thought that you could emulate donald trump's success, a little bit different now. the thing here is that i think that paul ryan really wants a big entitlement reform, not just welfare reform. i'm talking about social security, medicare, which are big slices of the federal budget. the president has said that he will not do it, but guess what, dana, i think that is what to ryan once, a lot of people in the freedom caucus one. they want to push that. and as you guys are saying, i am so pleased to hear you say it,

it is insanity right now because most americans see this as a giveaway to the rich, the tax bill. if you come back and say, we are going to pump up defense spending and smack down the elderly and the poor, and don't forget that they have yet to remove daca. and even republicans are saying, this is a problem by january january 1st -- >> dana: this is not something that sarah sanders talked about today, but i know that it is on their mind, we have to talk about the opiate crisis. today again for the second year in a row, we have the cd to see, center for disease control telling us that american life expectancy is going the wrong way. and they point to opiate addiction as being the thing that is increasing the deaths of young people in particular, young men. that is something we need to figure out. i don't know what the answer is. >> brian: i was just at the border, most of the border

patrol says we have a problem with illegals, but we mostly have a problem with that in all, coming over the southern border. i will say this, i think that it is an oversimplification to say that the whole thing is a tax break for the rich. most of the people with money are complaining, they are not getting their break that they thought that they were going to get. when you look at corporations come i want to quote mitt romney, it is people. and their entry-level jobs in those places and an opportunity to bring people back. and the movie industry, of all things is going to benefit the most. >> dana: will they write any good movies so? >> brian: i'm not sure. >> juan: did you just say that the rich were saying they are not getting enough. >> brian: they get 2%. 37%- 3035%. >> jesse: the rich are people too, juan! >> juan: ebenezer scrooge is a human being. 87% of the benefit has been going to the rich on the corporation's commanding guys

still want more. >> brian: corporations are made up of people that are middle-class. the corporations who are rich people? >> juan: if they create jobs for those people, that would be great, but this is about awarding shareholders. >> brian: if they act responsibly, that would be the answer, but if they act responsibly, they will grow the company, they know that they are going to get it again. >> juan: if we trust the very rich, they will help us. >> jesse: has a poor person ever giving you a job, juan? >> kimberly: what brian is saying is very important, you kind of demonize the corporate's, but they are a family with individuals at all levels of corporation in support, working in staff, et cetera, why do you want to begrudge them an opportunity to do something and provide for their family? i don't understand it! some improvement and relief is better than none at all. >> juan: do you think that corporate products are at a higher level? yes they are.

and stock market? yes, it is, oh, give the rich more. >> kimberly: the argument is continue to improve on a situation that has been fortuitous. why not do it? why not spread it around for the middle class? >> juan: the forgotten workingman. >> jesse: spread it around, obama said it, remember. a new love for the left, up next. ♪

[ gasps, laughs ] you ever feel like... cliché foil characters scheming against a top insurer for no reason? nah. so, why don't we like flo? she has the name your price tool, and we want it. but why? why don't we actually do any work? why do you only own one suit? it's just the way it is, underdeveloped office character. you're right. thanks, bill. no, you're bill. i'm tom. you know what? no one cares. (avo) but you also have a higher risk of heart attack or stroke. non-insulin victoza® lowers a1c,

and now reduces cardiovascular risk. victoza® lowers my a1c and blood sugar better than the leading branded pill. (avo) and for people with type 2 diabetes treating cardiovascular disease, victoza® is now approved to lower the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. and while it isn't for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. (avo) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so, stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms.

taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. ask your doctor about victoza®.

♪ >> juan: it is no secret, a lot of folks on my side of the aisle are not happy with the new g.o.p. tax bill, but in at the attack on african-american senator tim scott over his support of the bill go beyond the pale? the republican was a sale by blogger on twitter for repairing

next to president trump at the celebration of the passage of the bill. he wrote "what a shocker, there is one black person there, and sure enough, they have him standing right next to the microphone like a manipulated prop." now scott responded, he said "probably because i helped write the bill for the past year, have multiple provisions included, got to multiple senators on board over the last week and have worked on my tax reform -- on tax reform my entire time in congress, but if you would rather just see my skin color, please feel free." now he has since apologize, wrote a subsequent piece about the lack of diversity in the republican party and the trump administration, but the initial shot, he had to delete the tweet, he has apologized. it did not go over well. so let me ask you, what would you say? >> jesse: when the white guy plays the race card against a black guy it does not go too

well. >> juan: you are telling me. >> jesse: i know, sorry, juan. i know about gas, when you create a gas, you do not double down and write an essay about it making the gas worse. >> kimberly: where did you learn that? >> jesse: experience. he says the republican party has a diversity problem, they are just as many minorities in the senate that are democrats as are that are republicans. i don't know if you count elizabeth warren, how she is self identifying right now, but it is the truth. basically on power. >> juan: wait a second, i think the numbers are in congress right now. >> jesse: i'm not talking about congress, i'm talking about the senate. >> juan: there is booker and scott as the black senator. >> jesse: there is rubio, cruz, and tim scott. >> juan: if you look at the overall congress, 37% of democrats are nonwhite, while only 35% of republicans.

>> jesse: i do not think that they are adverse to having more black representation, it is not a problem, it is a challenge. they are not a lot of black republicans running to get the nomination. and if you are a black republican in this country, a prominent one, you're going to get savaged by the media and be called horrific scenes by democrats, racial slurs, and even democrats and blacks are going to say horrible things. that you are a sellout. >> dana: you will be left out of the african-american museum if you are a supreme court justice. >> juan: that is a shocking fact, i cannot believe the way with scott, but you look at ben carson, you go back and condoleezza rice, why is condoleezza rice they are when they had -- wait a minute, this woman has a phd, she is an expert in terms of russian affairs, how about her credentials? >> brian: compared to what african-americans have been through in the country, this is nothing.

to take a few slings and arrows as opposed to back of the bus in 1960 and 1940 so that you cannot play with white players up until jackie robinson is nothing. i think republicans are so off on this, they make no effort to recruit, not kennedy, voters. they make no effort to intercede, it makes no sense, because what they say they stand for showed resignation if presented correctly. and if you get repelled immediately, go back at it. it is an embarrassment. when you go to these different events -- >> juan: let me give you the report, 7% of african-americans identify as republican. if you ask, are you conservative, then it is up to one-third, and imagine a third of black people say that they are conserve an end, and you have to your point, i do not see conservative party and not from the president. >> brian: i did this event yesterday, and african-american put up his hand, a conservative group that was talking about the

book, and he said, when the question came up coming who is not talking about history, he said i am upset as an african-american of even affirmative action. i do not want to the scales tipped, i do not want -- if my weight is not high enough, i do not want to get up into the school. and i said, wow, i cannot say that, but i wonder if more people felt that way if you are an african-american who was 17 or 18 and they say a 96 is good for you, and a 99 for a white person, you might say, congratulations, mom, i got in, on the other hand, look what they had to do to get me in. that bothered him. i wonder how many other people out there feel the same way. >> juan: i can tell you that people that i know very well, justice thomas, for example, huge opponents of just your point. to the contrary point would be that affirmative action is not about unqualified people. if you get a 96 on the test and somebody gets a 98, you are both qualified. the issue is whether people were

previously excluded, kept out who are qualified and are we now opening doors. you see that for women as well. let me go to you, kimberly, stay with donald trump he gets a percent of the black vote coming yesterday which itself a congratulatory display, what part of the white house was that? >> dana: south on. the portico stairwell? i'm not an architect. >> juan: and i thought the most difficult part was that they refer to him as a prop. >> kimberly: would anybody like to be called a prop? white, black, latino, asian, male, female, it is so dismissive and so derogatory and unacceptable. there is something that you can say sorry, but that is not good enough, and tim scott is an outstanding public servant, he should be given the credit because of merits and because of the effort that he put into try to help the american people. he deserved his spot there. and i'm glad that he was there

and he worked with the president cooperatively and other members of congress to be able to make this happen. we owe him a debt of gratitude and thanks and appreciation for his skill set on this. >> juan: i thought he did a great job, the best job was his defense, it made sense. susan rice taking on president trump again, this time the former national security advisor to president obama insisting that donald trump's america first policy will only make our country less safe. something is cooking. in "the five" kitchen, a debate up next. ♪ and i can do it with what's already within me. because my body can still make its own insulin. and once-weekly trulicity activates my body to release it. trulicity is not insulin. it comes in a once-weekly, truly easy-to-use pen. it works 24/7, and you don't have to see or handle a needle. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable medicine

to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, if you have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you're allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or symptoms like itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i choose once-weekly trulicity to activate my within. if you need help lowering your a1c and blood sugar, activate your within.

ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.

>> all of the nations that take our money and vote against us at the security council, they vote against us potentially at the assembly. they take hundreds of millions of dollars and even billions of dollars and then they vote against us. we are watching those votes. let them vote against us, we will say save a lot.

people are tired of the united states, people that live here are great citizens that love the country. they are tired of the country being taken advantage of. we are not going to be taken advantage of any longer. >> kimberly: president trump's critics are fired up again after he threatened to end the countries -- two see jerusalem as the country's capital part of the votes add to the u.n. today in a moment. susan rice has a lot to say about mr. trump's newly available "america first" national security strategy. the former national security advisor wrote a scathing new op-ed, here's the tidbit. relinquishing the nation's moral authority in these times will only embolden rivals and weaken ourselves. it will make a mockery of the very idea of america first. from what i recall, the obama administration strategy to keep america out of danger did not exactly turn out so well. so, what do you make of those strong statement, strong wording? >> jesse: not prosecuted rescur

ambassador in benghazi was not "america first" ." >> kimberly: or the rest of the americans that were there. >> jesse: leading from behind is not putting america first. that is what happen under obama and susan rice. irani and scott ritter, north korea moved up, isis took over a rack, russia took over the ukraine, syrian dictator gassing, china was left on contract. donald trump comes in and corrects every single one of these things. around deal in the cross hairs, sanctions on north korea. isis destroyed in iraq, u.s. is now selling lethal weapons, and a tomahawk to the face, and cracking down on china. it seems like america first to me, and when she is talking about we are not pushing american values, we have relinquished our moral authority, susan rice and friends sat back while student democrats tried to overthrow the iranian regime. they also sat back and watched a solid gas on people and awarded

cuba, a horrible human rights abuser with a new deal. and they treated our best and closest ally in the middle east, israel like a piece of garbage garbage. i'm not going to listen to lectures on susan rice. she has no credibility, she ruined it on the sunday shows. she ruined it when she said that bergdahl was a great hero who escaped on the battlefield. >> brian: honor and distinction. >> jesse: honor and distinction, think you prayed enough from susan rice. >> kimberly: you have had it. today now, what you make of the statement? >> dana: she is responding to the president's nationally released security advisory. i would say, one way to respond would be 500,000 deceased syrians could not be reached for comment. and i really think that having not been there and pulling out of iraq too early, and all of these things that were a

cascading effect -- >> kimberly: we have talked about it a lot. just before they can go back and forth, there has to be a decision. on america first, it depends on how you do find it. every president, the most important oath that they take is to defend the united states of america. everybody is trying to put america first. some people have different ways of doing that, wanting a multilateral agreement on trade, the ppp that resident trump took. or the paris accord made a lot of sense, it does not toe president trump. that does not mean that they were not thinking that america should be first. but i do also think that the parade of horrible that they anticipated because of president trump has not materialized, and so the protestations that they rights in these papers and sometimes they on background or put out on twitter, leaving people a little bit flat. >> kimberly: brian, how did you see that it's? >> brian: you guys covered a lot of it, susan rice, not great timing given that the politico story looking the other way

seems to have a lot of length and substance to it. going to cause an investigation in the house which i cannot wait to get to the bottom of because i have a sense that it will not be political, but informational, because that backs up the latest statement of the farm policy which is nothing but successful, they look at the boys and the character of president obama and they love the way that he handled himself, they love the way that he looked on the world stage pretty thoroughly love the big crowds that he got, substituting that for a defective foreign policy even though he is a great family and a historic figure lament figure, his foreign policy is one misstep after another and a sacrifice for an iranian deal that is anything but strong and solid. to be honest, susan rice, i was not going to read -- the one thing that i knew this morning, because he read aloud, oh, good, i don't have to read that. it was "the five" that brought me into susan rice, i knew that i cannot get anything out of this that would help me, but i forgot about the "the five," now that it is a bad decision, but it is a decision that will not help my life at all.

>> kimberly: i mean really. >> juan: they just eliminate things that somehow rebut their worldview. let me give you something, susan rice is not a target here, because if you look at the security policy as enunciated by donald trump, it really moves away from america occupied in a leading role in the world given that we are the world's leading superpower militarily and the leading economic power. so when it comes to, for example, spreading democracy. i don't see that. what about human rights? she does not speak about it. >> brian: where do you want him to do it? >> juan: take something like ppp or something like all of the sudden pulling away from asia and allowing china to be the dominant player economicall to dictate human rights standard, that is crazy to me. >> brian: where is china dictating human rights standards? >> juan: all through asia now. >> brian: what are they doing?

is that your standard? where? >> juan: what i'm telling is that they have organized the asian countries going into a deal with china as the lead economic player instead of the united states. that is a result of his nationalistic approach to foreign affairs, and it is not good. by the way, you guys want to go back to what happened in the bogus story, totally bogus. why don't you go back to niger and ask what happened to our soldiers. we still don't know. you have to go and see the world not just as people who are -- >> brian: we see the world. i've been in the world for eight years, i don't need a recap. i don't need a lecture! >> juan: let me tell you, it was pretty successful, wasn't it? >> jesse: that's dangerous, juan. >> brian: south korea has never been more in tune

militarily. >> juan: was israel threatened then? no. >> kimberly: you just cut into your next spot. bad news. the hollywood hate fest for president trump goes on, tom hanks, the latest celeb next. ♪

whcold sore.et you? grab lunch? cold sore. when a cold sore takes over, campho phenique's topical anesthetic plus anti-microbial action soothes pain fast. what's for dinner? meat loaf. campho-phenique on, cold sore pain gone.

♪ >> brian: i've never heard that song before, but i will go with it. steven spielberg's new movie "the post" in theaters tomorrow. president trump is not going to watch us over christmas. a battle between the press and the government in decades past. written by juan williams, thank you for that part of "the washington post" editor ben bradley, just asked, by the way, tom hanks, if the president wanted him to screen it at the white house, would he go? his reply, i don't think i woul would. in fact, i would not have been

able to imagine that we will be living in a country where neo-nazis are doing torchlight parades in charlottesville and jokes about pocahontas are being made in front of the navajo code talkers. this is where the personal choice is going to have to reflect our opinions, i would probably vote not to go. we should note that the president has not asked to screen the movie or asked for tom hanks to come over. but it is a preemptive note from tom hanks, what do you think the reaction should have been, juan? are you surprised by the man who starred in so many great movies having this reaction? >> juan: no, i think that lots of people do. are you honored if the president of the united states? i don't care who he is coming by you over to the white house? for this, lots of people on the democratic side opted not to go anywhere near trump and the christmas parties and the like, so i don't think that this is a unique response. the question is, at some point you just want to people might say, bite your tongue. but i think that tom hanks was

asked a question and he answered honestly. >> brian: dana, do you think -- >> dana: of teeth marks and my tongue. if he calls, we will talk about it. it is not hard to say. >> brian: he could've gotten out of it very easily. >> dana: it is the same thing that we talked about with the athletes, lindsay vann that was asked about president trump in the olympics? would she go to the olympics if she got the gold medal? the press is going to want to do that because it will help the press, it is not going to help them. so i would always take a pass on it. >> brian: you know it is incredible, he knows history. this guy has really gotten into helping the federal sea, he makes great movies. if he is not acting in them, he would produce them. you would think that he would get the sense of history in the white house and the president asking you to come to screen or movie that that would overwhelm any thought of, i don't agree with him on the policies. there was one incident in virginia, it is not like every day the president is saying, go do this and go do that when it comes to charlottesville.

>> kimberly: you are absolutely right, but he can stand on principle, this is what he thinks and believes. it would not be my choice, do you have a lot of people in hollywood taking stands like this and having personal opinions and using their celebrity to be able to make statements against the president or his policies, against his statements or viewpoints, that his first amendment. it is not something that i like to hear or experience -- >> brian: would you ever give up your full see is season of "bosom buddies" on tv because of this? >> kimberly: i don't like this show. >> brian: it was very good, it was about two friends trying to make it in the world. jesse, do you have questions? it's funny that you bring that up, because i do have a question for you. screening 48 hours ago of churchill, and the president invited them over before the tax plan was signed, and they evidently had a great time, isn't that indicative of these

two parties not getting along, coming together around one movi movie? >> jesse: i do not think coming around a movie of watergate is the right to a movie of this president. president trump is not going to screen watergate movie at the white house, may be bad vibes. >> kimberly: bad idea. >> juan: doing >> jesse: at one point any one celebrity trash is trumped, two americans in the heartland vote for him. >> brian: every time you hear a bell, the angel gets his wings, that is the opposite. >> dana: in 2001 when president bush took over, one of the first things he did was invite ted kennedy and his wife to watch a movie. it was about to jfk, i believe, that is where they started work out and ultimately got the two things that president bush claimed as his big accomplishments the first year. the tax cuts and no child left behind. >> juan: this movie is about the pentagon papers, not watergate. >> jesse: similar. >> brian: ben bradley did do

watergate. [laughter] you know what i was getting at, similar era. >> dana: you are going to get a mom attack. >> brian: we need a subscription to moviefone, this would've been ironed out. is anybody feeling stressed out with christmas four days away? fear not, help is on the way according to reports, the best thing you can do is relax, unwind during the busy holiday time. we have the one thing that can change her life and just a moment. ♪

liberty mutual saved us almost eight hundred dollars when we switched our auto and home insurance. liberty did what? yeah, they saved us a ton, which gave us a little wiggle room in our budget. wish our insurance did that. then we could get a real babysitter instead of your brother. hey, welcome back. this guy... right? yes. ellen. that's my robe. you could save seven hundred eighty two dollars when liberty stands with you. liberty mutual insurance.

♪ 's before it is christmas and for days, supposed to be a holley in jolly time, but for many folks it is a stressful and anxiety provoking one. how do we unplug, unwind and enjoy the holiday? we literally unplug according to one psychologist, go on a digital d detox and put on the device and anything that has a screen and let your brain about a power down. i read about somebody -- it was in the magazine, i read this past weekend -- >> jesse: national review. >> brian: no, they took a three month break, it was a new yorker. they took a three month break

and said it was really healthy? >> brian: if it was not work-related, i would go back to the flip phone. i do not remember the last time a text or email helped me. it seems like every time i looked down, there are nine things that i have to do, and i'm wondering, was i just not doing these things before the text messages? >> dana: just time away from it, what you think? >> jesse: i did a digital detox today, that's why i did not know what the movie was about. [laughter] >> kimberly: you detoxed all the way back to watergate. speak to my whole life has been a detox. i like detoxing, if you are in the news business and you are asked to talk about something and you have to say, well, what happened over the break? so it is hard for us. but i recommend it for other people. >> juan: here's the thing, remember going to the doctor a few years back and he said, you know, you just need to chill out. you need to calm down.

>> brian: you paid him for that? >> dana: also told you to drink more water. every doctor says drink more water. >> juan: his suggestion was don't wear a watch. and i love watches, but he said, don't wear a watch, because even as you are waiting in the waiting room, you kept looking at your watch, he says, that drives up your pulse, don't do that. he suggested that i get away from catch up and use more mustard and stuff like that. >> jesse: did you say don't sit next to me? [laughter] >> kimberly: catch up has too much sugar. >> juan: sugar and salt, not good for you. but this idea is excellent, the way that i lead my life, i know that it frustrates a lot of people, i don't keep my eye on email, and text messages. >> jesse: you don't say, juan? is that why you are always late? we are always like, where is juan? >> juan: i just basically low, if you knew me, you will call me.

and i checked the email every once in a while, not like i am out of touch. but around here people are attached at that. >> dana: the other thing, kimberly, especially men get themselves in trouble and they look ridiculous tweeting things all the time, if they just step away, they can retain their dignity. >> jesse: are you talking about the president? >> dana: no. >> kimberly: delete the twitter off of your phone or something. >> dana: i recommended that to hannity. >> kimberly: that was obviously very funny and i did not last. i don't know that i could do this, because obviously, because i feel so -- such an urgency to know what is going on and what is the latest news and we get updates during the show of a lot of things coming in at this hour. >> dana: can you take a break for the holidays if you are not on air? >> kimberly: no, absolutely not, i will be prepared to do a

show absolutely every single day. >> brian: you have a fireman's pole in your house and you drop down and do the show. >> jesse: [laughs] >> dana: it's actually the north pole, where all of the toys are, kids. don't worry, up next "one more thing." ♪ i accept i don't bike as far as i used to.

i even accept i have a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat not caused by a heart valve problem. but no matter where i ride,

i go for my best. so if there's something better than warfarin, i'll go for that too. eliquis. eliquis reduced the risk of stroke better than warfarin, plus had less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis had both. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily... ...and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. i'm still going for my best. and for eliquis. ask your doctor about eliquis. ♪ ♪

>> jesse: it is time for one more thing, queen kimberly. >> kimberly: that will be part two, but part one will be queen kimberly royal news, "hannity." we have peter schweitzer, tom jarrett, representatives desantis, dan bongino, we have everyone, larry elder, oliver north, now it is time for kimberly's royal news. yes, indeed. all right, people, you know what this was about, right, engagement photos. kensington palace has just released at the stunning new royal photos and they are quite exquisite, take a look, just he likes them a lot. you see megan wearing a black ground and the prince supporting a blue suit. they hold hands, very cute and charming. i like the black and white, that is very cute. in a candid one for the third, these came out very nice. one of the producers did not like them, i will not give her name. [laughter] >> jesse: she is not coming to the royal wedding.

>> juan: merry christmas to you all, and this time of year i am so grateful for so many people in my life, but especially the people who are in the background and help us here at fox news, so i want to say thank you to all of those folks, here i am with sher mara at the 17th floor reception. up on 17, the daytime receptionist. here i am with the person who takes care of our lobby, here i am with the makeup people on 12 who take good care of me. >> dana: they have a lot of work to do. >> juan: and here i am with zach who sticks a plug in my ear every day. and here i am a two of my favorites, michelle and joe joe, just the most wonderful, warm people. thank you all. you guys are the best. >> dana: a woman was denied entry to an airport lounge for wearing ugg boots. not allowed in the airport because she says she was wearing

these ugg boots and complaining that they were not loungewear, but they say that we remain consistent and uphold our lounges dressed guidelines to all of our guests. so i ask you all on twitter with a poll, the first i've ever done, do you think that ugg boots are sleepwear or loungewear? 57% of you said no. so they are going to have to rethink. >> kimberly: but they are also expensive. >> jesse: and you guys can wear them, says tom brady. people were wondering where i was yesterday, i want to thank charlie kirk for inviting me to speak at the student action summit for turning points usa in west palm beach, florida. about 23,000 students out there where i wrestled and dazzled them all, and it was a great event, thank you very much for inviting me. it was a wonderful event. >> kimberly: charlie is very nice. >> brian: in the 22nd side i have left, the jackson dinner is

being turned to the barack obama dinner. and the war war in history hisy continues. if there is enough time for amazon to put it into a padded envelope. >> jesse: "a special report" up next. brett, are you going to buy his book or not? >> bret: already on the show. congressional republicans hurry to get a deal done, united nations defies the united states and condemns the recognition of jerusalem as israel's capital. and is the government about to take another look at two of hillary clinton scandals? this is "special report." ♪ good evening, i am bret baier, congressional republicans are basking in the glow of political touchdown and at the form of tax reform legislation. now they are trying to get the extra point by ramming through a funding bill