tv Hannity FOX News December 21, 2017 10:00pm-11:00pm PST
10:00 pm
tune in every night at 8:00 to the show that is the sworn s enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and group think. good night from the nation's capital, where there is full employment, thanks to your tax dollars. we appreciate it that. kimberly guilfoyle in for sean hannity tonight. >> kimberly: well done, tucker. welcome to "hannity" ." i'm kimberly guilfoyle inin for sean tonight. several breaking news stories. nbc is reporting jeff sessions has ordered review of the highly controversial uranium one deal. according to nbc, department of justice prosecutors are interviewing fbi agents about a russian bribery case that took place while uranium one was being approved. this is said to be part of an effort to determine if a special counsel is needed. plus, key officials face questioning on capitol hill. deputy fbi director andrew mccabe goes before lawmakers for nearly nine hours while g controversy builds over anti-trump text messages peter strzok. and demoted doj official bruce ohr appears before senate investigators afteric
10:01 pm
revelations that he met with members of fusion gps. reaction to those stories in just a second. but, first, congress avoids a government shut down by passing a spending bill. but it is setting up major a legislative battle in january. ed henry is in washington tonight with all the details. ed? >> kimberly, great to see you. the key here passing temporary budget doesn't just keep the government open, it paves the way for president trump to sign the tax cut into law, with a senior official telling us tonight there is a very good chance that will happen tomorrow. the way the tax package was written, signing it this year would initially have meant that it triggered some automatic spending cuts next year. but this continuing resolution, the stop gap budget, just passed through the house and senate, includes waivers that enable the president to defer those cuts to entitlements until 2019. the president also made p clear he did not want a messy shutdown to overshadow the winning on taxes saying house democrats want a shut down for the holidays in order to t
10:02 pm
distract from the very popular just passed tax cut.er house republicans, don't let this happen. pass the cr today and keep our government open. indeed democrats seem to be still be smarting from the president's victory on taxes.e after obama dan pfeifer tweeted "this triumphant photo with president trump and leaders oval office should be used on front pages when the president isan quote unquote indicted" another obama official, bennd rhodes, retweeted that with this snarky comment that the photo should also be used quote along sides the obituaries for ryan, mcconnell, and pence. steve scalise, who was shot and nearly killed by bernie sanders supporter who was targeting republicans thise year, slammed rhodes with this simple but savage come "you may want to reconsider your rhetoric." meanwhile, house democratic leader nancy pelosi went back to resisting the president's agenda by telling her colleagues to vote no on the stop gap budget because it did not include a provision allowing the children of illegal
10:03 pm
immigrants to stay in america. the president made clear he is not going to get backed down on side issues and wants to talk about jobs. >> i don't think in his heart that the president intended to hurt these people in the very cruel way that they are being hurt byo the actions that are being taken. >> we're bringing the entrepreneur back into this country. getting rid of all the knots and ties. you will see what happens. ultimately what does it mean? it means jobs, jobs, jobs. >> the bottom line is the last thing republicans want now is a shut down to be thens focus when several big companies have handed out bonuses, raised their workers wages in the wake of a tax cut after democrats predicted tax cut would not trickle counsel to employees.
10:04 pm
>> kimberly: joining us now with the reaction to the latest in the developing uranium one scandal is the author of "clinton clash," peter schweizer. thanks so much for joining us this evening. this is a fascinating story, peter. no one better to have on it than you. how does this new information fit into the larger uranium one scandal? >> well, that's a great question, kimberly. yeah. it's very interesting, the department of justice is now asking for all the material the fbi has on uranium one. it's important to point out kimberly, this is incomplete file. the uranium one investigation was launched by the fbi in the summer summer of 2015. they asked in late 2016 for the obama department of justice to grant them subpoena powers. that was turned down. that was reported on the front page of the "wall street journal." so, what they're getting is essentially what the fbi was was able to do without these powerful tools. it's a great sign that the doj has requested this information. we have to keep in mind that it's not a complete file andnd
10:05 pm
hopefully they are not going to face the decision on the independent counsel, based on trust and incomplete file. because i think a lot more investigation needs to be done. >> kimberly: what do you think in particular about a special counsel when they get more information in? what's the likelihood there? >> i hope that there is going to be more information. look, there are some basic facts in the reporting. the nbc news story which i think was quite good gotre some fundamental facts wrong that keep being repeated by democrats and by some media outlets. number one, the statement that no uranium from uranium one has been exported out of the united states. that is a falsehood. that is a lie. "the new york times" in 2015 confirmed that yellowcake was being exported by uranium one out of the country. john solomon of "the hill" are part of the same thing, citing nuclear regulatory commission documents. thisow information needs to be sifted and you need to have subpoena power to look at the financial records, look at travel records, and to start
10:06 pm
piecing together exactly what happened. once you get to that point, you can say, we needed an independent counsel or we need to have some other means of investigation. >> kimberly: why do you think that ag sessions decided to reopen the investigation? curious as to be exact timing. >> yes, that's a very good point. i think part of it is, there's been a lot of activity on capitol hill about uranium one. the department of justice, which is supposed to be investigating corruption, is a little bit behind the eight ball on this. you've got the senate judiciary committee, you've got the house oversighte committee, you've got the house intelligence committee, who are all investigating uranium one. and the department of justice's behind. part of this is they are feeling pressure from capitol hill. >> kimberly: let's talk about the testimony behind closed doors. we've been covering it. andrew mccabe, bruce or, they testified. what do you d think is going on behind closed doors and in terms of the content, the nature, the
10:07 pm
focus, the breadth of that information. >> board and we love to know what that was about. t this is really concerning two people. people get that people in the fbi sbir people. clearly the opinions in this case seem to skew in one political direction. we've been talking about something as sensitive as the investigation of a presidential candidate in 2016. people have to know and feel that there is going to be equal weighting. there doesn't seem to have been equal weighting. i think we are going to hear a lot from members of congress and that committee going forward about with the testimony was and i think we arei not done. i think we are going to expect to see more documents and more information on what precisely the fbi was doing. >> kimberly: talk to me about the duration of this.us in terms of, obviously trying to nail the case perhaps and acquired documents, get some people, whistle-blowers, to come
10:08 pm
forward with information, to be able to further the investigation in the interest of justice. >> that's right. with uranium one, you have to consider that this is a story that starts in 2005. we already have the video testimony of that minister saying that he was shaken down by bill clintonat and then senator hillary clinton to give this uranium to this canadian company, which then sold it to the russians. you have that, you have the flow of money, all this money going to the clinton foundation and into bill clinton's pocket, or people connected to uranium one. you have this expansive time period. really, you are talking about a few actors. i think from the standpoint of investigating that, if you have the right tools, with the fbi asked the doj four, it would not be that hard to figure out precisely went on. i think that is the next step. >> kimberly: it so interesting.ha you look at that long time frame and how about coordination and
10:09 pm
collusion they are? in terms of these people working together, and this is really fascinating to me, why wasn't this looked at during the obama administration, and then nothing while hillary clinton is running for president of the united states but yet they want to accuse president trump of collusion in his transition team into a gigantic document and wire grab of them without any evidence to support it? they come up with nothingg ther. >> kimberly, i sat at the beginning of this process, they should look into the russia question. i think they have come up with no substantial evidence. consider this. that trump dossier, that had all these allegations, one of the things the dossier said, the russian sources said they had a dossier that had damning information on hillary clinton. one question i would ask is, did you ever pursue that? you pursue this information
10:10 pm
related to trump. couldt you pursue it as it related to hillary clinton? say if you are going to investigate one, you should investigate both. that seems to be the best standard. >> kimberly: it supposed to be fair and impartial, a thorough investigation regardless of political persuasion unless you have a vested interest in it is determined it out nomadic outcome. thank you so much, peter. here with us, tom felton ande gregg jarrett. to get you to comment in terms of the information we heard from peter and where the investigation stands and where you think it is going to go.er >> these people at the fbi were capable of protecting and absolving hillary clinton in the email case, notwithstanding overwhelming evidence of crimes. are they also, kimberly come up capable of protecting her in the uranium onee? case? it's a crime to use your office to confer a benefit to a foreign government in exchange for money. it's wire fraud, its mail fraud,
10:11 pm
its bribery, it could even be money laundering if you are foundation as a receptacle of that money. it's all kinds of anticorruption crimes. you know, it's not the first time that she's been suspected of this. she's also been accused of helping ubs avoid the irs and simultaneously, her husband receives $1.5 million from ubs and a tenfold increase to their foundation. ap did a study and they found that half of thehe nongovernmenl people who gained access to hillary clinton donated lavishly to her foundation. if she was peddling access, isn't she also capable of peddling influence? >> kimberly: that are such a good question. when you learn about this, tom, you see the tentacles that really suggest corruption and collusion and again, this is an ongoing investigation. we have to see where it goes.
10:12 pm
we do believe in our system of justice are not an investigation should not, like i said, determent and outcome come because they wanted it to be one the side of the clintons. >> the justice department and fbi were ruined under president obama, attorney general lynch, and james comey. there is no doubt on that. compare and contrast how they handle the dossier last year with uranium one and the pay to play allegations of the clinton foundation. that reportedly according to fox news, andrew mccabe talked about how the fbi works so hard to verify that dossier and run us all down. they couldn't verify it but they work harder and pursuing it. now what's going on with the uranium one allegations, fbi agents are seeking information to get subpoena so they can pursue leads and they are being told, no. you have suppression of a clinton investigation on yet another matter. with this over-the-top attack -- this is what the dossier was. a clinton attack, a clinton campaign funded attack on
10:13 pm
president trump, that the fbi took a ton from a clinton camp and ran with. it's really extraordinary. i hope these agents at the justice department are talking to have more protection because given the leadership there at the fbi now, frankly, they are going to have targets on their back politically speaking, in terms of their careers, for speaking out. as a serious situation. the idea that you are going to let -- again, the bureaucracy figure out whether the bureaucracy should reopen this investigation, i'm not confident the right decision will be made but who knows. >> kimberly: very interesting. talk a little bit about the juxtaposition of these two investigations. it's unbelievable. it is unprecedented. >> one is beginning to wonder, given the paucity of evidence of collusion with trump and russia, there seems to be a plethora of evidence of collusion between hillary clinton had her campaign and dnc and russia. it's a crime to pay a foreign
10:14 pm
national, including a russian, money for information on a political opponent during the campaign. if you are not honest about it and your financial filings to the federal campaign finance act, thatt is also a form of money laundering. and so, you know, all of this is very suspicious activity. i agree with tom. it's all going to come down, i think, in the end, to the dossier. that may be the biggest smoking gun of all because it looks like theju fbi and the department of justice are engaged in nefarious activities to fool a fisa judge to falsely get a warrant to spy on the political opponent, donald trump and his associates, and it was all being funded by hillary clinton's campaign and the democratic national committee. did the fbi know that? i suspect so. the month that's the pivotal question, isn't it?
10:15 pm
what did they know and would? if they took that it acted in bad faith, like you said, to achieve nefarious ants because they didn't want president trump to become president of the united states, they were spying on his family, and of course, leaks coming out from adam schiff right away about that testimony but nobody seems to want to complain about that. it's unbelievable how unfair and imbalanced visits in terms of whatat went on and just the absolute missile lock focus to try to create the air and idea of collusion and corruption and coordination with the russians and not one scintilla has come forward fromru that. >> that's true. we've uncovered documents showing that hillary clinton through bill clinton received $500,000 from a uranium one firm connected to the russian government. moscow, he went there to speak, got a half million dollars. it went into their bank account, not the foundation. then the clinton campaign. some want to go to russia to
10:16 pm
talk to russiansi intelligence o dig up dirt on donald trump. by the standards that mueller has presented in terms of reasons to investigate someone, certainly there are to be a special counsel looking into what hillary clinton was doing, getting money with the russians, and working with their intelligence services to figure out if there was thereir to be gotten on her political opponent.. >> you know, increasingly, almost day by day, the shape of a plot is beginning to emerge. >> kimberly: so true. >>er people were determined, for political reasons, to absolving to exonerate hillary clinton, to clear a path for her to become president. at the same time, launching aut fictitious investigation, without evidence, of trump-russian collusion in a political campaign, which, by the way, there is no statute that prohibits that sort of thing, as long as money is not exchanged. >> kimberly: correct. >> we may try to frame donald trump i'll exonerating
10:17 pm
holler a clinton, all of this for political reasons? evidence be damned, it's looking like that. >> kimberly: the fisa warns, the misuse of the judicial process, this is what the height of corruption, it's all prosecutable. this investigation, we'll be talking about it for a while. >> the fbi isn't accountable. it has been for decades. they can get away with doing things and then when they are asked by congress, they say, oh, we can't talk about it, it's classified, a pending investigation, both of which are canards in the circumstance. >> to be fair, tom, we have to find out specifically who are the bad apples because for the majority, the rank and file of the fbi, men and women, they are outstanding. i don't like what i'm seeing on the top levels and i don't like theom relationship between muelr
10:18 pm
and comey and mccabe. it's just -- there's a hugege problem there and hopefully they are going to get to the bottom of it and this investigation. the final word. >> i agree. we need to clean house in both agencies in terms of folks that were responsible for what went on during the prior administration and fell into this one.tr we got to get the information out. there is no excuse that we still don't know these key answers about who paid for the dossier, how was it used. the fisa application. information about the fbi texts and other issues like that. we are still fighting about the tarmac meeting that went on between clinton and lynch. what is the hold up? the agency -- they have to be transparent and hold people accountable. >> kimberly: what's going to happen? will keep after it until it doe does. thank you so much. coming up, congressman ron desantis is demanding answers of a new report ignoring hezbollah's criminal activity in
10:19 pm
10:22 pm
if you'd have told me three years ago... that we'd be downloading in seconds, what used to take... minutes. that guests would compliment our wifi. that we could video conference... and do it like that. (snaps) if you'd have told me that i could afford... a gig-speed. a gig-speed network. it's like 20 times faster than what most people have. i'd of said... i'd of said you're dreaming. dreaming! definitely dreaming. then again, dreaming is how i got this far. now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network.
10:23 pm
>> kimberly: welcome back to hann >> kimberly: welcome back to "hannity." congress isan demanding answers tonight after politico determined that in its determination to secure nuclear deal with iran, the obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the united states. republican congressman jim jordan and ron desantis are following up on that story by sending a letter to jeff sessions, asking the department of justice to turn over all documents and communications related to this matter to find out whether the obama administration did this to help
10:24 pm
secure the nuclear deal with iran. joining us now with more on this request is congressman desantis. a fascinating story and it's so disturbing at the same time. congressman, how do you anticipate the doj is going to respond to your request for documents and information? >> i expect them to respond favorably because this i is an important issue. if you go backhe to the second term of obama, remember what ben rhodes said, the iran deal is the obamacare of the second term. everything was subservient to that. they did all kinds of things to get that deal through, obviously, they told a lot of falsehoods to the american people in the process. this thing was hezbollah, who, by the way, has american blood on itsts hands, one of the most lethal terrorist groups in the middle east. you go all theu way back to the beirut t bombing of the marine corps barracks in 1983. hezbollah was the perpetrator of that. so they have been wreaking havoc in the middle east against our allies, against thede united states, for decades. to make a conscious decision to
10:25 pm
ward off a very sophisticated task force thatas was pursuing them, knowing that that would allow their drug running and money laundering operation to continue on unabated and therefor, and power hezbollah, that is a very monumental and i think disastrous decision. we need to know what happened, who told them to stand down, and we also need to get the architects of the iran deal, like ben rhodes, and see what they were involved with the doj shouting this down. >> kimberly: you are so right. i'm glad he followed up on that. ben rhodes, all roads lead back to him. he's got the answers. he's the architect. from his own words, his own admissions, it sounds like he's making himself an ideal subject of an investigation to comply and come forward and proffered explain exactly what transpired. >> remember, he bragged about creating a fake echo chamber where he had journalists that will put artists information
10:26 pm
about how this is really capitalizing on an opening of the uranium regime, they are going to change and become part of the nation. they knew that wasn't true. they knew they weren't changing. they just thought that giving them $150 billion of sanctions relief, airlifting over a billion dollars to them in cash, they thought that that was good. and that with the policy that they pursued. i think they pursued it recklessly. investigation, we are going to find out just how reckless they were. >> kimberly: i just question that policy. i question its merits, a question it's ophthalmic authenticity, the whole nexus, how it came together, and what exactly did they think they were accomplishing. was it some ego trophy to say they could do this nuclear deal? it was a bad deal for the united states and now we noticed how bad. >> exactly. they wanted to hold up "the new york times" the next day and say, we have this great deal, consequences be damned.
10:27 pm
if you think about the deal, they never did anything to prevent iran from producing ballistic missiles. of course, we don't have access to iran's military sites with this deal.l. it is really a deal that empowered iran immediately and pay for the way for iran to develople nuclear weapons in the near future. with a disastrous deal, you'd also see the consequences of my collateral damage by empowering hezbollah. if you ask somebody like prime minister netanyahu ofou israel, he's worried about isis but i think he would probably point to hezbollah as the most significant t terrorist group in his neck of the woods. >> kimberly: absolutely. he tried to point that out at the timeis, he was pointing his objections to b the united stat, he knows full well, who better than he to determine and decide what is going on in that region, especially based on their excellent intelligence gathering? we already knew it. we know is a bad deal at the time. nevertheless, it was pushed forward and now we are finding
10:28 pm
out the ramifications. it reminds me of the fast and furious. the cover up there. it's unbelievable. it seems that ahead of specific political goal in mind and acted against the best interest of the united states and supported, essentially, terrorism, with iran and hezbollah and found that it. >> probably on both ends, by having the dea stand out, that empowered hezbollah on the front-end, and when they are getting the cash in theas back d of the deal, why do you think they want the cash? they want to give that to the revolutionary guard, they want to give it to groups like hezbollah so they can continue to wreak havoc in the middle east. it was a disaster from the beginning to end. >> kimberly: you're right. i thank you for your service and what do you have done here and i look forward to finding out the rest of this information. obviously, we need you to come back a lot. congressman desantis, thank you. > merry christmas. >> kimberly: merry christmas. joining us now with more, fox
10:29 pm
news contributor herman cain and matt schlapp. how much do i love these two guys? and very excited. herman cain, 999. may with the public can understand that. it's unbelievable. let's talk about this. the obama administration gave a free pass to hezbollah, but should there be a very thorough investigation because of this? ben rhodes and all the rest of them. >> there absolutely should be a thorough investigation and this is not the first time that the previous administration deceived the american people, but it is the first time that we have this kind of evidence that congressman desantis and others are a uncovering that tes us there are some rats and mice. we just don't know exactly how many, and we don't know how deep it goes. i'm glad that they are doing this so that they can continue to try to unfold for the truth
10:30 pm
is. certainly, we know that this is leading to a bad place for the previous administration and iran has never been our friend. they acted like iran was our friend but they were never, and never will become our friend. >> kimberly:rl based upon the terrorism in terms of hezbollah, very deadly, very dangerous, very much still alive and activ active. thank goodness president trump follow through on the campaign promises to crush isis. now look what we did? we gave t money that ended up going directly to hezbollah. this is insanity, matt. >> it is insanity. the money part of it is a really big part of this, kimberly. the money went toha all of the things that is not in the interest of the united states. i think the important t thing he is the democrats will say, this is all political and donald trump and the republicans want to relitigate the scandals of the past. but this is very -- keep it in
10:31 pm
focus. for iran deal has been decertified by president trump, thank god, another campaign promise kept. but it is still operational in many ways. it's very important that the american people understand how putrid and polluted the whole process was by which obama bent down and took a knee to the terrorists across the globe, to the casters in cuba, he gave away all these things tour american haters, people who undermine our national security. you know who he was tough on? catholic nuns. people -- he had it all wrong. i think on this nuclear deal, we have to go to every length we need to to keep the american people realize just how terrible and corrupt it was. >> kimberly: thank you. the product of the education of the. catholic school and the sisters of mercy. >> me, too.
10:32 pm
>> kimberly: w herman, where to begin to prepare? it seems like we are shedding light on it. there will be some transparency. some people have to testify, like ben rhodes, the architect of the echo chamber, the media at the time was making fun of them, they were saying that they were going to investigated. >> here is where we go from here. congressman desantis and his committee need to continue to push the issue. that is number one. number two, when they continue to push the issue, more and more will be uncovered. now the reason that this waited this long before it was uncovered is because the liberal media was complicit in exposing this. the american people are not stupid. they smelled a rat from the beginning. the media did not want to uncover this so they just sort of ignored the story. and matt is exactly right, in terms ofso what's coming out.
10:33 pm
so where we go from here, keeptr digging, keep investigating, and keepme trying to tell the amerin people the truth. we don't know all of the facts, but we do know that there are some rats in this whole deal. >> kimberly: that is for sure. paying respect to the american people, the smart voters who said they had enough of this corruption and insight dealing, and not acting in the bestrr interest of the united states, funding terrorism, unbelievable. >> i think the one critical thing here is that congressman jim jordan and congressman ron desantis are both dogs and heroes and they want to pursue aggressively. what happens to a lot of these courageous congressman, sometimes, people who are more senior and the republican conference, they get nervous about too many investigations. they get nervous about looking like they are being political, going after people like barack obama and hillary clinton. and i say to all of those republicans, you owe it to your constituents, you owe it to the american people, for them to
10:34 pm
understand how seriously corrupt these deals where. i want to know the truth, you want to know the truth, we want to know what happened here. and all of these investigationsb about hillary clinton, uranium one, the emails, all the corruption of the fbi and loretta lynch's doj, obama's dear jay, we need the answers. when we get the answers, we can close the book and the american people will deal with their politics but you don't get the answers it makes people hate their government even more. >> kimberly: president trump, right away, acting with clarity to undo this mess with the nuclear deal, the paris climate change record. one bad deal against the dash after the next. i've had it. herman cain and matt schlapp, thank you so much. >> thank you, kimberly. >> kimberly: with new democratic scandals mounting, the left is lashing out at republicans for exposing them. tammy bruce, lanny elder -- larry elder, and dan bongino join us next. stay with us.
10:38 pm
and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.
10:39 pm
♪ >> kimberly: welcome back to "hannity." as the russian collusion narrative collapses, liberal lawmakers and their allies in the media are lashing out at republicans andin others who are exposing them. watch this. >> their attacks are not based on fact or logic. this is a hatchet job, plain and simple come with a concerted campaign tost discredit him in e right-wing media is nothing more than propaganda and disinformation, to try and turn the public's attention away from the real investigation. >> we are witnessing a concerted, coordinated effort to undermine the entire investigation, from mueller to the fbi commitment to the department of justice, to make this all seem as though it's a corrupt enterprise. >> it seems to me they are
10:40 pm
throwing whatever they can, like monkeys throwing poo against the wall. >> these are not a enormously destructive against our administration of justice. a major distraction from the russia investigation. >> part of an ongoing republican attempt to divert attention from the real investigation to the the collusion of the trump campaign and the russian. >> kimberly: joining us now the reaction, salem radio nationally syndicated host larry elder and former secret service agent dan bongino and fox news contributor tammy bruce. first question, tammy, why do they have to bring the monkey cage and? like that's the most they can can think of? >> this is hysterical. the awful things they are saying. what are the highlights is a meltdown. they don't know what else to say. a great day for not just the president, but for the country,
10:41 pm
it highlights with the democrats have not been able to accomplish for at least eight years. there is the equivalent of complaining about, pour bob mueller, the equivalent of saying that the tax and jobs bill was armageddon. it sounds ridiculous, as an effective. of course, this is on the heels of all of these other remarkably -- the remarkable political story. you have been hitting all the marks tonight. obama and hezbollah. ben rhodes wishing -- saying that he wished to see the obituary of mike pence, ryan, mcconnell, saying effectively he wants them to die. this is an admission by the left so they have failed completely and all they have now is hysteria. >> kimberly: real hysteria. get some serious counseling, obamacare is not going to help you.. do you agree to the left attack in the g.o.p. is a distraction to avoid all of these numerous scandals that we have seen in the news? >> of course it is.
10:42 pm
i guess i have two reactions. let's remember how they treated ken starr. james carville said, "i hate ken starr, this is america, you ain't got a love somebody, , i hate ken starr." they called him everything. it's not as if the critics of the muller investigation don't have merit for crying out loud. what about all of these appearances of impropriety? staffers in this investigation that is that horrible things about donald trump. apparently involved in the gpsut matter without telling other people. there are legitimate reasons to question his probe, when you have lefties like alan dershowitz and jonathan turley, two prominent left-wing law professors, also questioning the integrity of the investigation, maybe there is something about the integrity of this investigation that deserves questioning. >> kimberly: absolutely. the end, i have seen you on about this. field day, right? absolutely. >> kim, i am tired of this. the democrats get away with everything i asked mike what do they do?
10:43 pm
they turn around or they go to their media sycophant acolytes and they say, hey, please, uncover for us on this big trump russia fairy tale. the sale of uranium to supposedly the most dangerous enemy in american history and how we find out from a politicat story, potential international gunrunning and drug dealing by hezbollah, while the obama administration's alleged to have looked the other way. we are supposed to get all hot and bothered about a trump- trump-russia asked while gillian anderson-david to company conspiracy theory that not a hu? i'm sick of this. >> kimberly: the corruption of the judicial process, misuse of fisa lawrence, going to judges o specify who wouldy be in the oval -- that is what they tried to do. they tried to predetermine into.
10:44 pm
ages like peter strzok saying insurance policy, they were all in to do this. >> this was their presumption. their sloppiness was born out of overconfidence. they presumed she was when -- she would win buy they felt comfortable, kimberly, to be as sloppy as they were because they felt the system woulds makt happen. this is what is so shocking about what happened and why they can't adapt. this is their issue. also i would say that for when it comes to the republicans, i appreciate congressional investigations, there's a place for that. clearly, if there was ever a special counsel required, it's regarding the obama and hezbollah connection, as well as uranium one. i know, again, sessions is looking into the fbi dynamic with uranium one. but these are crimes that are so shocking, still trying to get hero mind around them. these are the things that they knew that they would need to cover for. this is what ben rhodes is so shocked about. did things during the eight years and this is why, by the way, do you remember after the
10:45 pm
election,ba hillary strangelyat apologized to barack obama? around it at the time, they hated each other. why is she apologizing? they knew what would come out as the result of or failure. >> kimberly: there is the corruption and collusion, larry. feast your eyes on that. it is all over >> and my column, today, it was about what would happen if obama spent the last ten months of his presidency battling charges of collusion because apparently someone had taken a meeting with somebody who had opposition dirt on his opponent? for ten 1 months, obama had been fending off accusations that he did not win the election. it was collusion between him and putin and that is what got him the election. can you imagineim with a black lives matter people wouldu be doing, what the nfl players will be saying, what the black caucus would be saying, the naacp? they would be screaming how racist this probe is, how lame it is, the that initially it was
10:46 pm
about collusion, and now it's at obstruction of justice. thisry country would be on firee i asked my friends on the left to imagine what things would be like if the same situation were done, except take out the word trump and put in the word obama. tell me honestly how you would feel. >> very quickly, the republicans have got to be aggressive on this. they've got to be extremely aggressive. they can't put it into the whole of the congressional investigation. this is outrageous. if the americans and see what is being half wow passed off, we will have a crisis again. >> kimberly: a couple seconds left. dan,ri they savaged the american family, they tried to undermine a newly elected, duly elected president with this false corruption, collusion hoax. >> kim, i think you will find out in the coming days and weeks that they special counsel has been a cover because they lost their insurance policy, which was hillary clinton to cover their misdeeds.n this is their misdirection, the special counsel.
10:47 pm
>> kimberly: it's all coming out, folks. larry, dan, tammy, what a pleasure. fantastic panel tonight indeed. coming. up, ambassador nick nikki haley unloads on the u.n. lieutenant colonel oliver north is here with reaction. stay with us. ♪ keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424.
10:51 pm
♪ >> kimberly: welcome back to "hannity." the u.n. voted overwhelmingly today to condemnru president trump's decision to recognize jerusalem as israel's capital.do u.n. ambassador nikki haley issued a very strong warning to the general assembly ahead of the vote. take a look. >> the united states will remember this day in which it was singled out for attack and the general assembly for the very act of exercising our right as a sovereign nation. we will remember it when we are called upon to once again make the world's largest contribution to the united nations. and we will remember it when so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more, and to use our influence for their benefit. america will put our embassy in jerusalem. that is what the american people
10:52 pm
want us to do. and it is the right thing to do. no vote in the united nations will make any difference on tha that. >> kimberly: joining us now is ce host of "war stories," lieutenant colonel oliver north. thank you so much for being here. a very important day in history and the response and strength of this administration. how do you think that president trump and the u.s. should respond to the anti-israel vote today? should funding be polled as the president and nikki haley have suggested? >> kimberly, this boat at the u.n. today, i guess a utopian globe deist, globalist idea of g victory of the united states. i guess it has been that way since the early 1950s when it started turning against us over the korean war. the united nations invited us to the korean war and then turned against us. the decision to open the american embassy at the invitation of a country that wants us there is, as
10:53 pm
nikki haley pointed out, a sovereign right of ours. the president did what she sighed. he acted on behalf of the american people, overwhelmingly supported. of the 193 member nations of the u.n., nine voted against it, 35 abstained, and 21 were absent, a total of 65.mb the president and nikki haley, theyey both said they are taking names. cutting of foreign aid budget seems to be a good while. probably won't play while in egypt, afghanistan, pakistan, but it's time to invite the u.n. to take up residence, one of the 128 nations who voted against our sovereign right. i thought it was a good idea, maybe they should move the u.n. to moscow. how about this time, how about kenya? the fifth largest in receiving american aid in africa. >> kimberly: unbelievable. you bring up a very interesting points. the problem is, sometimes whensa people push back on criticism,
10:54 pm
we say that we have to make sure we don't cut funding because we need to make sure that regions of that area, highly volatile, they are stabilized. you mentioned our more problematic areas that we needo to address them a countries that have been receiving aid like afghanistan, and ongoing process to try to control uncontained terrorism there. in addition, pakistan, who we rely on in a pivotalhe way, although they haven't been very forthright on many occasions, including with usama bin laden, it gets complex. as a war hero, tell us, someone who was in the theater, you are with the men and women who are serving, do you think it willdi have a deleterious impact on military readiness, informationi intel in the area, being able to combat against terrorism, a reduction like that? >> no. because there is no one else who can do it. the british voted against us in this thing. the french voted against us. of course, russia. combined, the three of them
10:55 pm
couldn't handle our commitments for national security to protect us, the american people. for example, military aid and stabilization age in a place like afghanistan or more than a rack lot of sense for us. but given giving it to dozens of nations, does anybody remember, what used to happen when the so-called oil for food program, run by the united nations, with our money, and the corruption and graft and greet at the united nations headquarters? carried out over the middle east at the same time. theot united nations has nothing they can stand up and say. >> kimberly: lieutenant. colonel, thank you so much. more "hannity" next. >> i appreciate you.
10:59 pm
>> kimberly: welcome back to hannity. unfortunately that is all the time we have left this >> kimberly: welcome back to "hannity." unfortunately, that is all the time we have left this evening. as always, we thank you for being with us. don't forget to set your dvr so that you never miss an episode of "hannity" or "the five."
11:00 pm
you can follow me on twitter. the laura ingraham is live now from washington, d.c. laura? always. >> kimberly: all right. god bless, thank you so much. >> laura: you take care. welcome to the ingraham angle from washington. the president is poised to sign his historic tax cuts into law tomorrow. we'll tell you how he has reshaped the g.o.p. straight ahead in the angle. plus, we will expose the strategy behind those frenzied democratic warnings that the president shouldn't fire special prosecutor mueller. and the justice department is asking the fbi some very tough questions about their investigation of that shady uranium one deal involving the clintons. and at the u.n. the world condemning the united states for moving its own israeli embassy to jerusalem. but the president is taking names. a lot of people on that naughty list. so what's his next move? and did hollywood really
158 Views
1 Favorite
IN COLLECTIONS
Fox News WestUploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=2085098881)