show on cable news in total audience. thanks for making that happen. leave a message. see you tomorrow night. that's all the time we v. what are you writing down? >> what is that number again. >> [laughing] >> put the number up for laura. >> laura: i got it. are you going to call the hate "hannity" hot line? >> laura: right after my show. mine will be the first one you play. i will talk like this and i like to use the word "like" a lot. >> sean: in all of your years of media did you light a bong for somebody? >> laura: that's the only way you can get me to watch cnn. i think it's better to have them

on the cannabis than to see kathy griffin flashing anderson cooper. >> sean: you can't make this up. happy new year. >> laura: congrats on the ratings. >> sean: you too. you had an amazing year. >> laura: welcome to the 2018 edition of the ingraham angle from washington. liberals are using sexual harassment beyond a shadow of a doubt for political end. the predictions about the president that were all wrong. that's the focus of the tonight's "angle." before we get to our main topic, it's a new year. signs of progress made by the president and his administration are everywhere. they are blooming. it's like spring time. it's so coldoud. remember a year ago when the liberal prophets of doom predicted that a trump

presidency would tank the stock market and kill jobs and mark america's retreat from the world. boy, were they wrong. a year later even the "new york times" is grudgingly admitting due to trump's rollback, business leaders are awash in a wave of optimism investing in new plants, equipment and factory upgrades that bolster economic goth. -- growth. forecasters are going upward with trump. today's "wall street journal" reported that wages are rising do you believe the national average in areas with low unemployment. paychecks are starting to swell.

here's my predic. as trump's policy and tax cuts settle in, our economic forecast will get brighter. now to the latest sexual harassment opportunism out of hollywood. they got star treatment in magazines and newspapers. a couple of 300 female power players announced the time is up initiative. an effort to fight sexual harassment and other gender issues across the country and in the entertainment industry itself. it's convenient that these powerful women that knew about harvey weinstein and others like him are seeking to cleanse themselves from any guilt by social media correspondent to this type of gesture.

beheath the girl power platitudes and recruiting anita hill to write up a blueprint to end sexual harassment, this feels like another leftist hack group. like a political action committee. at the heart is a legal defense fund with a $13 million war chest that will be used to litigate sexual harassment claims. donors? to fund this. meryl streep, reese witherspoon and other hillary backers. like what jesse jackson used to do with operation push. the defense fund is led by tina chest. her only previous game to fame she was chief of staff to michelle obama. the whole effort is being overseen by the national women's law centers legal network for gender quality. that's a mouthful.

this legal network was just created last october according to the see. -- ceo. she said the group was founded in response to the trump presidency's all out assault on women's rights. let's be clear what this is all about. this is not an effort to protect women although the trappings are there. there is an obvious attempt by hollywood leftists to organize for 2018 and 2020. times up members include evalongeriar and others that should a hilarious challenge. at the golden globes on sunday, women are being asked to swear

black and use the red carpet to argue for racial and gender equality. black? black is classic, but it's kind of depressing. their entire box office was dependent on the 40-year-old franchise of stars wars and 60-year-old wonder woman. >> women are expected to look beautiful and smile and not say much. longeria said we are not willing to just be ornaments and cell this awards show without asking big questions about power in hollywood. >> laura: maybe this is an attempt to bring up the golden globe sagging ratings.

many of these women made million dollars flaunting their bodies. in the awards shows, there are talented people there, women and men. but at times the dresses defy the laws of physics with double sided tape. you can wear whatever you want, but don't be shocked when people including men stare. it is going to happen. these seam people, producer, writers and actors who objectified women. they are the moral conscience of the entire country? are they looking like pilgrims? oh, okay. that's eye good look on her. perhaps a little house on the

prairie collection will make a premier on the golden globes. don't hold your breath. you know who will do more to help women, they won't admit it, but i tell you who. there he is, donald trump. an improving economy is good for all women. women are half the work force if not more. they need a growing economy. wages going up and optimism and confidence. the hollywood crowd is great at stomping their feet and fund-raising for liberal causes. if they really cared there their industry, hyper-sexualizing women and young people, hollywood, time's up. that's the "angle." joining me now for reaction in new york is monica crowley, from

the london center from policy research and julie, the digital director of lifestyle titles at "times" inc. i said a lot. tell me what i got wrong. correct me. tutor me. go ahead. >> frankly, i think it's bizarre that you believe that this is some sort of liberal conspiracy constructed to collect emails addresses to campaign for 2018. these women are standing up for women who are unable to speak up for themselves. low paying jobs working in farms, hospitals, hotels and restaurants. women who don't have the platform to talk about sexual harassment but experience large amounts of selects. -- sexual harassment. they are connecting these women with legal experts and money.

they are lobbying organizations for legislation that help peo e people. i am confused why you seem to think this is a nefarious process. >> laura: the national women's center was just started in october. one of the core mission statements of this group is focussed on donald trump. you don't think that lends some political taint to the otherwise laudable goal of protecting women in the work force? this from an industry that made million dollars hypersexuleizing women? taking advantage of young women who are naive and ignorant of the way men are in the workplace.

now they get million dollars for an organization that is populated by all liberal actresses. we are supposed to believe they just found their moral conscience? that's not bizarre. they focussed on trump right from the beginning. >> the things you point out about this industry, hypersexualizing women and treating them poorly, i think that's exactly what part of this mission is trying to address. 80% of board members in hollywood are men. 96% of directors are men. these stories are told by men. part of what this initiative is doing -- >> laura: these stories are not just told by men. women write their own stories about -- >> [overlapping talking].

>> 96% of the directors are men. >> laura: monica, they have a group called 50-50 for gender parity for 2020 an election year, your thoughts? >> yes, this looks like the late mobilization of never let a good crisis go to waste. the sexual harassment crisis is real. women do suffer at the hand of superiors and men across every industry as we have seen. but what we are seeing in the last couple of weeks and with these latest groups is an effort by the left to take this genuine crisis and hijack into 2 directions. one the liberal left wingdirection and have women that supplant man in positions

of power and authority. if women deserve those positions, more power to them. if they don't, then we have a problem. the other direction that this is being mobilized in is the direction of donald trump. in many ways the accusers of donald trump in late october right before the election, that was ahead of its time. right before the harvey weinstein story broke this wide open. they want to make those accusers relevant again. they will try to reanimate this whole thing to target donald trump. >> laura: of course. >> you guys are the only ones -- >> laura: we have to get into another issue. i want to show you how this can manifest itself. the big dollars being raised and dedicateed to derailing the

trump presidency, this happened before the election on. new year's eve the "new york times" reported that hillary clinton backers gave $700,000 to any woman who came forward with allegations against donald trump. not one woman came forward. is there any taint with that money from hillary's good friend? >> i understand where you are coming from. i don't like the idea of exploiting or digging up that sort of dirt. it wasn't like this money would go directly to the people who made accusations. this was money to go toward legal fees and things like that. i don't like the idea of exploiting people who have been

sexually harassed. there evidence that there have been lots of allegations against donald trump. he spoke about touching women in a sexual manner without their consent. there is smoke there. there are women out there who have been mistreated by donald trump and our country deserves to know about that. >> laura: david brock is a long time pal of hillary. runs all of these groups that support hillary. wrote a book exposing anita hill. now it's ironic she is brought in by hollywood to oversee this effort to expunge all sexual bias from hollywood. monica, i agree what you say. men in position of power take advantage of young women who need an opportunity. there is also a political element running right through.

this as most of the people, most not all, have been people on the left. that's just a fact. all of these hollywood people who have been accused, is there one conservative. most. of the people have been democrats. >> the story on brock and the m mony that went into lisa bloom's firm, we are seeing a weaponiation of sexual harassment this is a tragedy because they are really cases. the women victimized by this bad behavior will have their credibility fall into greater question. that's the real tragedy here. >> laura: ladies, cnn lended the year on a ridiculous high note.

a reporter marving about the ways to get legally high in a pot den. i am taking heat from the media after calling them all out. this one is one you will want to stick around to. stay there. mom's got this cold #stuffynose #nosleep #mouthbreather just put on a breathe right strip it instantly opens your nose... up to 38% more than cold medicine alone go to breatheright.com today to request a free sample.

get ready for centrum micro-workouts. the bottle curl. the twist n' turn. the stretch n' grab. the gummy squish. centrum micronutrients fuel your body from the inside out. grab a centrum and join in. repeat daily.

wifiso if you can't live without it...t it. why aren't you using this guy? it makes your wifi awesomely fast. no... still nope. now we're talking! it gets you wifi here, here, and here. it even lets you take a time out. no! no! yes! yes, indeed. amazing speed, coverage and control. all with an xfi gateway. find your awesome, and change the way you wifi. >> ♪ >> ♪ >> laura: cnn rang in the new year with something rarely if ever seen on national news. a reporter holding a joint and lithe a bong. -- lighting a bong. the network coverage included live shots from randi kaye in denver who reminded viewers it's legal in colorado. >> i came prepared this year. i thought maybe i would bring a gas mask with me so i would not

get the contact high. look at what is on the other end of the gas mask. yes, a bong. okay. now what? you will celebrate new year's early. i don't think this is what a gas mask is used for. wow. >> randy! >> this is for andy. this is for you. >> oh my god. >> [laughing] >> on cnn! >> laura: what a total dope. a dope smoking dope. a mother of a girl affected by marijuana called cnn's coverage a free info-mercial for that group. i was on the dance floor dancing the night away with friend and others.

i didn't watch a minute of television. but, you as a mother who lost a child to someone impaired while taking medical marijuana, i can't imagine your reaction to seeing that. >> it was very outrageous to see what i would call the irresponsible journalism on behalf of cnn. >> laura: they are saying, it's fun and games. corrine, it's legal in colorado and now legal in california. they did a big ribbon cutting ceremonies and lovely moments all over television that night. tell us about your own family tragedy as difficult as it is if you don't mind. >> sure. my daughter jennifer had just graduated from college. she was 22-year-old on the verge of a wonderful career. she wanted to fight drugs.

she began her first job. not in her field of study, but she was called into work as a district manager into one of the stores when an alrm off. as we went in, she was t-boned in an intersection by a man traveling 82 miles per hour through a red light. her car was pushed across the road through shrubbery and the doors of a building and the building on collapsed on top of her car. my daughter lost her life that night. the man that did this was uninjured, but he was high on medical marijuana. he was given a very light sentence of just 2 years in jail. only spent 17 months there. now he is out and off parole. >> laura: it's infuriating. all we hear about is how marijuana is the only thing you can take to ease pain. anyone criticizing it is heartless.

"newsweek" attacked me, i wear that as a badge of honor, for having a similar reaction to the cnn coverage as you i tweeted out we will see how this works out for our country. more pot heads and increase in psychosis and more impaired driving. "newsweek" ran a peiece saying laura ingraham roasted. i was hardly roasted. oh, i am scared. this is what they do to you if you take on big pot and the multi-millionaires funding this effort nationwide. your comments to mothers who are seeing this legalization movement grow nationwide. how to get involved given your own loss. i can't imagine. i have a daughter who is 12 years old.

we don't want anybody else dying on the road. >> i think we need to contact our senators and governors and state officials and tell them that we need more education in this area. a lot of people are filled with misnommers put out by the medical -- the marijuana industry. i think we need more education. this is not the weed from back in the '70s. this is a very powerful drug. it causes psychosis and many other things in people that smoke it. the more we legalize it, the more younger people are trying it at earlier and earlier ages. >> laura: evidence is building and growing. i appreciate that you have the courage to come on tonight. even though even hateful things are said about you and the victims of this legalization effort. i appreciate it. let's debate this issue.

is this a blight on the nation we should fight to reverse. in washington is will jones of the group of smart uses of marijuana when opposes legalization and a legalization of marijuana who teaches a marijuana class. professor you are depend on this legalization effort. we have seen the evidence building, the american academy of pediatricians of young people trying it at earlier and earlier ages. they have a likely to get addicted to pot and the developing brain.

are you concerned about any of that? >> i am certainly concerned that almost 100 years of prohibition set us back. the questions about how marijuana affects the human body, we have not been able to answer those because of prohibition. now that marijuana was legalizeed in california, we expect to answer some of these questions. the reason we don't have road side tests is because of prohibition. we were kept from doing any of the science involved. my concerns are about educating the public in the right way and people understand that legal marijuana is not dangerous. it's not dangerous to the individual. not nearly as dangerous as the policy of prohibition has been for 100 years. >> i don't like using the word

prohibition. that's not a great analogy. people think of what we have with alcohol. we had stories and a whole industry that was around. then we tried to shut it down. that was prohibition. right now we don't have a huge industry that is ingrained in society. we don't want to see an industry that profits off addition. -- addiction. in colorado we are seeing how they are profiting on addiction and we are seeing negative consequences from that. >> the marijuana industry that exists today is the underground marijuana market. >> laura: oh, really?

wait, wait, wait. professor, this might work on your students, but you for my classroom now. we have hollywood looking to brand marijuana in california. in other words, celebrity endorsement. >> oh, no. >> laura: we have willie nelson and snoop dogg. what do you think that says to the kids? if your kids show up high, you probably give them an a-plus? >> my class is more boring than you could imagine. >> laura: it sound it. the idea of just decriminalization doesn't get to the heart of the matter. will, address this.

the academy of pediatricians have dwelved into. the effects on the young developing brain. schizophrenia and psychosis. it goes up to 50% when people begin daily use at a young age. it's not having a beer every now and then. this is a powerful drug that is addicting in a percentage of americans. >> definitely. >> [overlapping talking] >> chris, let me get a word in here. >> [overlapping talking]. >> we are talking about addiction. addiction is the wrong word to use with marijuana. >> [overlapping talking]. >> what i am concerned about as an african-american and why i started to talking about this

issue, let's look at them targeting communities of colleges. minority communities have 8 times as many liquor stores. in denver, colorado, there are more pot shops in minority communities. >> [overlapping talking] >> we are talking about the police that in philadelphia -- the reason we de-criminalized marijuana. >> laura: we are up against a hard break. we will have you both back. >> we want to make sure. >> laura: we want to make sure we have real data. >> [overlapping talking]

>> laura: another bizarre turn and the investigation that details who they interviewed. are immunity deals as good as the paper they are written on? at invisalign®, we use the most advanced teeth straightening technology to help you find the next amazing version of yourself. it's time to unleash your secret weapon. it's there, right under your nose. get to your best smile up to 50% faster. visit invisalign.com to get started today.

eight hundred dollars when wet switched our auto and home insurance. with liberty, we could afford a real babysitter instead of your brother. hey. oh. that's my robe. is it? you could save seven hundred eighty two dollars when liberty stands with you. liberty mutual insurance.

>> ♪ >> ♪ >> laura: president trump is demanding his own justice department investigate huma abedin. former top aide to hillary clinton. the state department reached emails that the fbi discovered on the laptop of huma abedin estranged husband anthony weiner. they were when clinton was secretary of state and 4 were marked at classified. the president fired off a tweet that seemed to call on the doj to investigate abedin, comey and others.

saucier was compared to hillary clinton. let's discuss this with paul, former deputy independent council for the watergate investigation and here with me in studio. scott, tell me your thoughts. the parity of the handling or mishandling of classified information was handled.

classified information was sent even after the yahoo hack. she still kept sending it over. to me it's not negligence, that's recklessness at the very least. >> it is reckless. all of these cases are different. they stand on their own. the fact that they were reckless and sent it over public email whether it was hillary clinton's server or huma abedin's server doesn't create criminal intent. >> laura: is that a statue? >> yes. >> laura: sal, you are the legal eagle. don't you have a standard of intent. >> [overlapping talking] >> one of the statutes as we know gross negligence is all that is required. it's very difficult to compare

military cases to the case of secretary clinton and miss abedin. the key is how -- i would not look at the different outcomes, but how was the email investigation of mrs. clinton conducted? we absolutely know now that it was an abysmal and disgraceful investigation. conducted not in the normal way. that's very, very troubling. >> listen, here's the deal. it's gross negligence or general intent, these investigations are different. if you compare hillary clinton's investigation to the other investigation, there are lots of problems. there are people in the office that would agree with any criminal prosecution and that's why you have more than one person looking at the case. >> laura: what john solomon

reported tonight on the hill. the evidence include passages and fbi documents stating the sheer volume of classified information that flowed through clinton's insecure emails was proof of criminality. it goes on and on. >> that's one investigator's opinion. there was one decision maker. whether it was comey. >> laura: or peter strzok. >> no, don't go there. they have can their opinion. any investigation will difference of opinions. that doesn't mean the case had to be re-prosecuted. the doj is not a political animal. it's an independent entity that stands for justice. how would you re-investigate this? all of those cases you brought

up, they are not comparable. those individuals had no business with the information. they did other crimes like computer crimes. >> [overlapping talking] >> they found the pictures in a du dump. >> laura: are you saying? >> he lied about it and covered it. >> laura: the fact they destroyed all of these emails. >> she didn't destroy the emails. >> laura: does the sheer volume of emails here from a yahoo account, does that tell you anything more about intent? >> it's a piece that goes into the decision on intent. scott said something interesting

that the doj is not a political organization. the doj at the highest level and the fbi at the highest level understand the obama administration was highly political and the clinton email investigation was a farce. scott knows this. he is a former prosecutor like i was. anybody who knows anything about how the department of justice does investigation can point to 9 things in the clinton email investigation that were not by the book and are deeply troubling. you don't give immunity to people when you don't need to. >> [overlapping talking]. >> laura: we are almost out of time. >> compare to what happened to

michael flynn. you don't defend flynn. he told a barely material lie and gets a felony. they have a computer person who they knew had obstructed justice and then gave him immunity to tell them how he obstructed justice. >> [overlapping talking]. >> laura: to be continued. they were handing out immunity deals like popcorn flying around the room. >> it's pathetic and scott, you know it's pathetic. >> laura: happy new year. on the "the ingraham angle." protestors in iran. and trump's message to north korea's rocket man next. my experience with usaa has been excellent. they always refer to me as master sergeant. they really appreciate the military family, and it really shows.

we've got auto insurance, homeowners insurance. had an accident with a vehicle, i actually called usaa before we called the police. usaa was there hands-on very quick very prompt. i feel like we're being handled as people that actually have a genuine need. we're the webber family and we are usaa members for life. usaa, get your insurance quote today. trusted battery for your son's favorite toy?t maybe not. maybe, you could trust he wouldn't leave the upstairs water running. (woman screams) or, you could just trust duracell. ♪

has been a problem for me. mouth i'm also on a lot of medications that dry my mouth. i just drank tons of water all the time. it was never enough. i wasn't sure i was going to be able to continue singing. i saw my dentist. he suggested biotene. it feels refreshing. my mouth felt more lubricated. i use biotene rinse twice a day and then i use the spray throughout the day. it actually saved my career in a way. biotene really did make a difference. [heartbeat] >> ♪ >> laura: president trump is

strongly supporting the freedom speaking protestors flooding the streets of iran for the 6th straight day. obama gave them a cold shoulder in 2009. there is a danger here. just as president reagan encouraged freedom speakers behind the iron curtain, the u.s. can ill afford to get involved on the ground in another middle east disaster. john bolton is in the studio and david who served under the state department under president obama. where we are tonight on iran? >> these demonstration are significant. this is dramatically different from the 2009 demonstrations. what is at stake here is the future of the regime itself. the president is right to say the united states is watching what happens. i don't think there is any question of military involvement

here. >> laura: regime change, i have to calm down about that. it can be just like our alliance with poland. >> there is a huge amount of opposition to this regime that has nothing to do with the united states. the young people know they can have a different line. this regime is more vulnerable than people think. it's dangerous. i think trump is on the right track. >> laura: david, let's turn to what is happening in north korea. the president put out a tweet. i think we put it up on the screen. there it is.

david, your reaction to that? >> well, that's kind of a funny tweet. it's good to see president trump has a sense of humor, but this is a serious topic. he is right to remind north korea and its leader that he has a button we will use military strength against north korea if we can't come up with a diplomatic solution. there is an important point in iran. let's note the difference between iran and north korea. iran is an unstable government without nuclear weapons. north korea is unstable with nuclear weapons. that's a very significant difference. the reason we have that difference is because we have a nuclear deal with iran that caused iran to give up its new orleans. >> laura: obama hung those people out to dry.

i want to stay on north korea for a moment. i think there is something else going on with these tweets back and forth. i don't think it's just firing off a tweet about north korea. do you? >> the president made it clear the only solution to north korea is denuclearization, no new orleans. oo nuclear weapons. since there is zero chance of that, it requires dramatic action by china. >> laura: china is cheating. >> if you leave north korea with nuclear weapons or look at military force, that option has to be on the table. the president needs to not tweet about, but move forces to the region. the only way to get china and north korea to take this potential use of military force seriously is make it real.

>> laura: if japan goes nuclear, china doesn't want that. the region doesn't want that. that's what president trump is saying to xi in his conversations. >> that's correct. china has a lot of reasons to be more helpful. they have not been helpful enough yet. we need to continue to work with our closest allies in like japan and south korea. we have to work together and set goals for getting north korea to come to the table. president trump should not tweet as much. he should set an objective for north korea and get north korea to the table. >> laura: he is left with a mess and he has to clean it up. thank you very much. before the president meets with congressional leaders, i reveal my list of must do items before any daca deal. what the president must get in return for his country and the voters who voted for him in the last election. stay with us. you won't believe how much is new at red lobster...

...that is, until you taste our new menu. discover more ways to enjoy seafood with new tasting plates small plates, with big flavor- like yucatan shrimp covered in chili-lime butter and caramelized pineapple. and if you like hot, buttery maine lobster, get your hands on this petite red lobster roll. for new entrees, explore globally-inspired dishes like dragon shrimp with a spicy soy-ginger sauce. with so many new dishes and all the classics you crave, what are you waiting for? come taste what's new at red lobster. whentrust the brand doctors trust for themselves. nexium 24hr is the number one choice of doctors and pharmacists for their own frequent heartburn. and all day all night protection. when it comes to frequent heartburn, trust nexium 24hr.

>> laura: i understand that president trump is going to meet with congressional leaders tomorrow to try to hammer out a daca deal. democrats and establishment republicans want some kind of legal status for the nearly 800,000 illegal immigrants under the dreamers. that gives the president a lot of leverage to get what he wants. what we need. if trump is going to give the dreamers any kind of legal status, i have a sensible checklist what have he must demand in return. this is all goes with what he

campaigned on. number 1 build the wall. get the funding. not a puny down payment. i heard 1.6-billion dollars. we need meaningful funding for the border wall. building the wall is a top priority for the voters. it's a promise that must be fulfilled. ending chain migration. america used to have a common sense policy of giving priority to immigrants based on merit and what they could contribute to our society. now you need is a second cousin twice removed. we have to return to a practical season and endthe joke of the diversity lottery system. when national security is threatened, what is the point of

admitting immigrants at random. the lottery system should have never been enacted and must end. there is bipartisan support for that. verify nationwide. and we have to cut the number of legal immigrants by reducing the number of green card holder by half. 50%. president trump was not elected to help the dreamers. he was elected to build the wall and protect the american people. your move, mr. president. we'll be right back. we have a great wind up. remember our special night? abdominal pain... ...and diarrhea. but it's my anniversary. aw. sorry. we've got other plans. your recurring, unpredictable abdominal pain and diarrhea... ...may be irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea,

or ibs-d. you've tried over-the-counter treatments and lifestyle changes, but ibs-d can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi,... ...a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage... ...both abdominal pain and diarrhea at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have no gallbladder, have pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a bowel or gallbladder blockage. pancreatitis may occur and can lead to hospitalization and death. if you are taking viberzi,... ...you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi... ...include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d with viberzi.

when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly...

...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. ♪ keep it comin' love. if you keep on eating, we'll keep it comin'. all you can eat riblets and tenders at applebee's. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. >> laura: closing thoughts on the pot debate. cnn.com, the same people celebrating with a bong.

more pregnant women are using pods. what could possibly go wrong with that? this statistic: under 18, the use of pot has climbed from 12.5% to 21.8%, people under the age of 18. 18 to 24. cnn celebrating with pot on new year's eve. they are the ones who put the story out. come on, guys. nothing can be wrong for the baby or the mother with pot use for pregnant women. that's all the time we have for tonight. shannon bream is back to take things from here. i am delighted to see her. miss shannon, happy new year. >> shannon: happy new year to you. this is a drug-free zone. here's what we have going up tight. >> we will make america strong again. we will make america proud again. we will make america safe again. >> shannon: as he returns to washington to begin his second year in office, president trump