i love her profoundly. that is about is for us tonight. tune in every night or 8:00 to the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, velocity, said magnus, and groupthink. good night from washington. the great sean hannity is next. >> sean: we have major breaking news tonight. new developments about potential political bias in the rush investigation. john solomon and sara carter, they are both reporting at this hour that congressional committees are now tryinglo to determine whether or not the trump hating fbi agent peter strzok and his fbi lawyer girlfriend lisa page literally leaked information to the media. tonight also, the media and hollywood liberals are fawning and falling all over themselves to endorse oprah winfrey for a 2020 presidential bid. after her big speech of the golden globes. have they anointed a new savior? this comes amid new reports tonight that oprah might actually run. while hollywood liberals are patting themselves on the back, they are ignoring their massive hypocrisy on the issue oful

sexual assault and misconduct. we are the only show that will expose that. we'll cover it all. tonight's breaking news opening monologue. ♪ a big monologue on oprah tonight. i hope you want to hear my take on that. that is coming up in just a minute. first, we have to start with tonight's breaking news. both john solomon and sara carter are reporting that provoked all my congressional committees are trying to determine if fbi agent peter strzok and his fbi lawyer girlfriend lisa page literally leaked information about the rush investigation to the press. here's why. solomon reporting the text messages between strzok and page appear to show that in fact they had advanced knowledge about a "wall street journal" article and it was about to be published. take a look at this text exchange between paige and strzok that was obtained by "the hill" page tells strzok, "article is out but hidden behind a pay wall so can't read it." strzok responds, "wall street journal? boy, that was fast.

should i find it until the team"? there are other text messages about the media like this: page replies: wow. according to the "the hill," congress is trying to figure out what the see if article means and who strzok and pedro trying to there under the bus. there is a method here and all of this. lisa page says, we are trying to get a list of kids with their parents names -- how many of us reporter from "the new york times" could be there in d.c.? "the hill" is reporting that strzok and page exchange the text messages about tracking downages information about a "new york times" reporter that they wereport referencing in tht text. why would they be looking into a "new york times" reporter? page writes: and strzok says:

they take horrible -- they want the trump hotel to fail. both reports are saying that because of the existence of various textis messages, referencing the news media, congressional investigators are now working rightly to determine if there was any improper liking to the press about the rush investigation. how else would you interpret those words? john solomon, sara carter, they will be here with all of the explosive details, that is coming up. also, members of the media, liberals and hollywood, they are giddy tonight over what? oprah winfrey speech at the golden globes, which i would say with very good. many are saying that she sounded presidential and was a campaign style delivery. according to new reporting, oprah is considering running in 2020. here is a part of what oprah said of theke golden globes. let's take a look.

>> so i wants all the girls watching here now to know that a new day is on the horizon! >> sean: now to the media, the left in this country, strzok os their chosen one, their messiah that they will blindly worship and follow like the sheep they are. here's why. the media on the left in this country, they now seem to think that oprah is the one person i could help them fulfill their ultimate goal, to destroy donald trump and defeat president trump. just look at how the media, how transparent they are, fawning over oprah's speech. does this remind you of the same people that never vetted obama and attribute zero seven end '08? we don't know much about her politics but we know she's inspiring on tv. watch this. >> she'skn known as the queen of talk and last night, the world was listening. the all-star crowd captivated by her poignant message of female

empowerment, a a speech so inspiring, many calling for her to add yet another title in front of her name, president. >> oprah bringing the audience to its feet, setting the tone for hollywood, and women around the globe. >> after that speech, she had quite a few people in that roo, saying they sure did like the sound of president oprah winfrey. >> if she were to get income of the next day, she would be leading the fight for the democratic nomination. >> i was back in the room while the speech was going on, and i will tell you this, everyone is mesmerized. >> that speech last night was not only empowering and inspirational but i thought it also echoed a lot of hillary clinton since concession speech. >> it was 5 minutes of desperately needed therapy for anyone who was watching for you to. >> it gave people who open it reminded people what is so great about this country and the strides that this people have made and how we still have so much to be helpful for. >> sean: that doesn't show their bias? oh, yeah, it does.

after the speech, and bc treated an endorsement for oprah. look at this. nbc called out for their massive display of bias. they deleted the tweet had quickly tried to shift blame for someone else by putting the statement on twitter that says, "yesterday tweeted about the golden globes and oprah winfrey was sent by a third party, not them, and agency for nbc entertainment in real-time during theme broadcast. it is a reference to a joke made during the monologue and not meant to be a political statement." that's what they have msnbc four. they are the operative arm and basically an extension of theio press office of the anti-trump media. really? does anyoneli believe that? i personally don't. a third party agency?to are they trying to get some poor kid fired over this? nbc got caught red-handed and noww they are trying to spin ths and hope that we it will all go away. let's be honest here.yo when you're talking about nbc, they are not fooling anyone about where their politics and

political allegiancesti lie. look at conspiracy theory 24/7 msnbc. hate trump, hate trump, hate crime, that is our programming for today. nbc, like the rest of the media, they despise, loathe, hate the president and is not a secret. let's all stop pretending because the game is over. when bc wasn't the only destroy trump outlet to keep praise on oprah. take a look at these headlines. "the new york times," president oprah? after the golden globes, some have a 20/20 vision. "usa today," oprah 2020. her speech has fans dreaming of presidential bid. the guardian, cut oprah winfrey run every president had been met? and then there is hollywood come after last night speech, all of these private were all showingth off their newfound political affection for appropriate this is their new savior. take a look.

>> there is a movement afoot, oprah 2020. >> i'm not kidding you, i am all about oprah 2020. >> obviously, president president oprah winfrey, it just rolls off the tongue. >> the reaction online, please run. >> i hope she runs for president. >> i think she's our next president. >> sean: did any of them ever see a nice word about trump ever? the economy is doing better than it has an eight years. where does oprah stand on the issues? here is what meryl streep is saying about oprah.p?y do "she launched a rocketars.s.wh . i want her to run for president. i don't think she has had any intention of declaring but now she doesn't have a choice." poor oprah, your life is not committed. others like obama's former speechwriter, he got any action of tweeting, "oprah winfrey is as brilliant and inspiring as any public figure today. she doesn't directly speak to

celebrity america, should be speaks to america. don't underestimate her." cnn political analyst we did this: look, i know you people in hollywood, and all of you in the liberal media, i know you were all intoxicated and addicted to trumptr hate, but maybe you ougt to put a little bit of pressure on the brakes with your oprah obsession. are you ready to go that deep into your oprah speech commotion that was brilliant in many ways? i have no problem with oprah winfrey. what she did in many ways was great. i'm glad to see sheea stood up l women, especially in hollywood. i support that, as i think everyone should. i also think oprah has ak tremendous capacity for human empathy. have you ever watched her show?

she is an incredible, strong personal story, overcoming sadness and tragedy and horrible upbringing. i applaud her for what she has done in her life. politically, all i know is that she has a board and barack obama. other than that, i don't know that much about her in terms of runninges for president. i was to the media and the snowflake hollywood left, take a deep breath, control your giddiness. i know you hate trump.s don't jump on me oprah 2020 train just yet. the economy has never been better in eight years and i know you don't like that this president stands up sooner korea and iran and he's not trying to bribe murdering dictators. you will have to get use to peace through strength because it actually works, so buckle up, it is going to be a rough three years from here. that is the problem with the left. i will never understand why they are there looking for a messiah, a savior, someone that will save thesa country. we don't need another liberal chose her to fix our problems with more government. reagan once said that government

is not the solution, it's the problem. we need more individual freedom in this country. we need more liberty. look at what the liberals dead in the last eight years. can you even look? you all loved obama. his track record was atrocious. to all of you starstruck people tonight lookingng for your next chosen one, you may want to relax and stop trying to buy your ticket on me oprah 2020 train.e here's the other point tonight. the hypocrisy from the left, liberals, the golden globes, it's stunning but it's not surprising, very predictable. everyone, just like in the liberal media, everyone, to basically a person, praising oprah. by the wake of much of the degree hollywood, for their movement of me too, it's greatmi what she did. i think it's awesome. but we can forget that misconduct is and has been

rampant in hollywood for decade. i i don't trust anyone that they are really coming in their deep heart of hearts, except the people that were victims. actually believe while they are saying at this point. why? a lot oflo hypocrites out theren this issue. for example, room or hollywood embraced director roman polanski? he was accused of raping multiple times a 13-year-old girl. 1977. after hee gave her champagne and quaaludes. at the time, he was 43. he was eventually charged with six felony counts but he fled to europe before being sentenced. you would think after that, hollywood would be completely in the business of disowning and renouncing roman polanski. that never happened. here's what i did instead. back in 2003, he won an oscar for best director and the celebrity filled audience erupted in applauseer like i had never heard before, even the roman polanski can't come back

to america because he was avoiding authorities overseas. listen to the level of cheering when his name is called out by harrison ford. watch this. >> roman polanski. "the pianist" [cheers and applause] >> sean: really? standing ovation? raucous applause? a child rapist, a 13-year-old to give drugs and alcohol to? at its worst. hollywood support of him did not and then, in 2009, when he was arrested in switzerland and connection to the 1977 case that he ran away from, he had over 100 celebrities, many hollywood signing a petition demanding his

release. like i said, it's all great. hollywood, pat yourself on the back of my 50,000 award ceremonies a year, i can't stand it or watch a second off it. it took decades and countless people that suffered before you finally are able to do it and do it right? joiningwi us now with reaction,e have the host of michelle malcolm investigates, michelle malcolm. former white house press secretary sean spicer. it was 2009, michelle, when the writer signing a petition for r. use out the roar and the standing ovation. i think oprah was right. she says -- i have faith in her. i don't have faith in all of the people racing for the next savior. >> in the clip that you just showed, among the people who left to their feet for roman polanski were hypocrite meryl streep and of course now accused multiple predator harvey weinstein. i have to disagree with you

slightly, sean, because as much as i -- >> sean: we have been family for years. go ahead. >> [laughs] that's right. i do not join in all of the effusive praise for oprah's speech last night. i thought it was textbook partisan, and ideological identity liberalism. and she, herself is one who has been accused by multiple victims of harvey weinstein ofg being a fixer for harvey weinstein. there are many infamous pictures of her -- >> sean: i've seen the pictures. but to be fair, did she know? we don't know if she knew. a lot of people have taken pictures with meth and you over the years. we don't know them. >> no question about it. but the consensus from so many of the people who have been complaining about harvey weinstein for years and have been ignored is that "everybody

knew." meryl streep knew and many people believe that oprah winfrey knew, as well. so look, the idea that hollywood and democrats strategists think somehow that oprah winfrey has a chance in 2020 and that she is allowing all of us pause to happen, she has her boyfriend, stedman, cheering on all of the casa about a potential run, what would we get? we would get another eight years of the same kind of chicago machine identity liberalism that we got under barack obama who has, in part, so large a role of oprah winfrey to thank for getting him where he was. last night, all of hollywood,ra and oprah, were pretending as if the last eight years of the obama administration didn't happen. that come unto me, is what is most troubling. the unreality of the people in

the hollywood bubble. >> sean: sean, i go back, i felt in many ways between letting obama and reverend wright and black liberation theology and acorn and frank marshall davis, i felt like they were few of us. michelle was one and there were a few of us that vetted him. then after eight years, there were very few of us to talk about, we had 13 million more americans on food stamps, 8 million more in poverty, the lowest labor participation rate since the '70s and we double the debt that he gave iran $150 billion. truth, fact, substance matters but i feel like i was alone here in a lot of ways. i had michelle, like family to me, by my side and a few others. that is about it. so why the rush for a savior again when the last savior they

chose failed so miserably? >> look, i think the thing that is interesting is what oprah said last night all americans should agree with. i agree with you. respecting women, creating a safe work environment for all individuals is something we should agree on. it should be beyond politics, it should be beyond ideology, it should be something that every american and human supports. that being said, i think it's an interesting thing last night, she didn't talk about policy, she didn't talk about how to solve the more controversial issues, and to your point, they are about to coordinate someone who gave a speech on frankly something that not only should we all agree on, but something that you aptly point out is highly hypocritical. the people in that room, it is not just roman polanski, it's bill clinton, it is others, who when given an opportunity to speak out, they overlooked it. >> sean: that they did more. you have to sit in a room, i don't know how you did your job for as long as you did come and noticed in an interview, you are kind of hard on yourself, and i

am thinking, you didn't do much wrong because they were so hostile. i can't think of a moment they have given trump a break and they gave obama every break. both before, during, and after. what is your experiments with the press? >> i i have known a lot of thee guysys for more than two decade. i think there was unbelievably a massive amount of hostility never seen before. in the pew center backed it up. 63% of the coverage against president trump was negative, only 5% positive, which is three times what it was of obama. they came out guns a blazing in the mainstream media. they were upset that they were wrong and they were going to take it out on the coverage. >> sean: last road, michelle. >> i think that hollywood and the democrats need to put down the oprah bong. why they are so desperate as if you look at the current field of

democratic potential candidates for 2020, you've got elizabeth warren, you've got bernie sanders, who will be 79, maxine waters, who cast as the fresh-faced of the democratic party, no wonder they are grasping for this trough oprah winfrey. >> sean: guys, good to see you. i appreciate you being with us. by the way, on the "hannity" hotline, one guy says t tonight, you'll hear it, every time you open your mouth, a kitten dies. wow. it's rough out here. coming up, we expose the breaking story tonight, the fake, phony anti-trump broke the mainstream media is fawning about. john solomon, sara carter, they are breaking news on the anti-trump fbi agent. new texts tonight, part of mueller's special counsel and looking to the press? we'll explain. ♪

you won't see these folks at the post office. they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale.

go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

running a small business is demanding. and that's why small business owners need more. like internet that's up to the challenge. the gig-speed network from comcast business gives you more. with speeds up to 20 times faster than the average. that means powering more devices, more video conferencing, and more downloads in seconds, not minutes. get fast internet and add phone and tv for only $34.90 more per month. comcast is building america's largest gig-speed network to give small businesses more. call 1-800-501-6000 today. >> which happened to be >>ue it happens to be a true statement. a self-made billionaire however illusionist reality tv and change the course of politics. >> i'm sure he's very happy that he said that. there is one viewer that you care about right now. you are being obsequious in order to please him. you have wasted enough of my viewers time. speak if you know who i care

about? >> sean: from cnn's fake news jake tapper rudely cutting off white house advisor stephen miller, the two were debating michael wolfe's book. he hass been making the media rounds butut he has casting dout as to whether or not you can believe it is in his own book. it's pretty spectacular. >> you have tapes. will you release the tapes? >> i have put every journalist i have. i work like any journalist. i have tapes, notes -- >> if people are questioning it, why not produce the evidence? >> because i'm not in your business. my evidences the book. read the book. if it makes sense to you, if it strikes a chord, if it rings true, it is true. >> sean: it if it rings true, t is true. we have a new standard of journalism i guess. he writes about me in the book. i never got a phone call. michael wolff, hello, still waiting. what you wrote is not true and it's not just me. there are a ton of claims that

the book, people are saying are complete fabrications on lies. meanwhile president trump's former chief strategist, steve bannon, put out a statement expressing regret about the commentsok he made in the book about the president and his son, donald trump jr. he said that his support for the president isr unwavering and donald trump jr. is a patriot and a good man and he went on to say that there is no collusion between the trump campion and russia and the investigation is a witch hunt. let me guess, i bet we will see steve's remarks being played over and over again like a first remarks. in the new york counsel put it on note, page 828 were no one can see it. joining us now with reaction, former secret service agent dan bongino, the author of the brand-new book, bookstores everywhere, hannity.com, "the new americant revolution: the making of a populist revolution." rnc spokesperson kayla mack and

he is here. let's start with reaction to the book. all the fact that he is amitting that he didn't have right to the fact that he says this will bring on the presidency in aa radio interview with the bbc. >> this is a fake, fraudulent, phony books, belongs in the tabloid section of a supermarket. you've exposed several of the lies. i expose several of the lies it is so funny, he says he knows of the president's reaction was when he became president. he got this from steve bannon. when the president was a small kitchen and trump tower, ivanka was there, jared was there, steve bannon was there. somehow he purports to know that he was horrified. what happens was, trump had written a preplanned acceptance speech, he ripped it up, and he wrote another one, those are the reactions of a leader, not a horrified individual. >> sean: i know from my own experience on election day,

kelly yan knew that they would win win. i know what he said about me is not true. under talked to the president, now president, but the candidate on election day. i called him three times, dan bongino, three! wants to say don't believe the exit polls, it is just like 2004, wants to say it is looking really good, and the next time before any network called, to congratulation him. those are my three calls. >> one of the funniest parts of the book is where he claims that the president doesn't know -- >> sean: he tweeted about it five times before! >> sean, he's golfing with him! the book is -- i'm not even goingsa to say to "national enquirer" because the "national enquirer" occasionally got things right, like the john edwards story. the "national enquirer" -- let me tell you the inside story. here's what is really going on and here's why the media needs

this book to be true. the democrats are panicking right now, sean, and i know you feel the same way about this. the tax kits have been running from the hill. they thought it would flameout like obamacare and a and pray that how the failure from the tax cuts would end the trumps political bank account, and once his political account was empty, they would move to impeach. now the economy is turning around and they are panicking and that is where the book provides a basis for around two, the 25th amendment, he is mentally unstable, which is quite possibly the dumbest narrative i've ever heard. >> sean: you write a lot about this in your book, "the new american revolution" ," i see ts president, i have not changed my views since i supported reagan. a little before the time. you are the next generation. the next point is, he has never wavered on his promises.

we had a year's worth worth of incredible economic success. and they don't like that he's actually standing up to murdering dictators. >> absolutely. he is achieving at record rates, sean. you look at circa judges, a record. stock markets breaking records. you look at tax cuts. we haven't had that in three decades. regulations being rescinded. >> sean: obama failed. why can't anybody in the media acknowledge the failure? >> he was an utter failure. this president is achieving. they can't take it. when i sat on a panel with eight liberals on cnn -- >> sean: you have my sympathy. >> you sent me a very nice notes of encouragement throughout the election. this was a voice of sanity, they show. >> sean: what you make about the opera phenomenon? it is very reminiscent of "yes, we can," change, change, change, we had eight years and it failed

miserably, and things are working now, why do they want a savior? why are they so full of hatred for this president?of >> because the democrats, their entire ideology, liberals, is built on this cult of personality. remember, what is the essence of conservatism? is a set of objective values, rights from god. we have a star that guides us every time. the person that gets us there is just a vehicle. he does not become -- that is not the case with a left. they believe, there are star is the state. the representative is the politician. they need a call cult of perso. oprah is the golden calf. >> sean: does anyone know anything about politician poli? your book is in bookstores everywhere. when we come back, john solomon, sara carter was new explosive reports on the anti-trump agent within the fbi and new texts.

we will be joined by harvard professor alan dershowitz straight ahead. ♪ dynamic performance, so you can own the road. aggressive styling, so you can break away from everyone else. the bold lexus is. experience amazing.

>> sean: fox news contributor sara carter ♪ >> sean: fox news contributor sara carter and "the hill"'s john solomon each out with brand-new reports detailing the allegations of the housee and senate as to whether the fbi agent peter strzok and other fbi employees may have been responsible for meat media leas responding the investigation. joining us now, john sullivan, sara carter, and the author of the best seller, alan dershowits with us. let's go to the details, john, we'll start with you. basically, they are admitting, when they talk about that they have advanced knowledge, the article is output hidden behind a pay wall, and it goes through a -- thee whole tone is anti-imperial, just a tiny bit from us, paige replies, there is

more -- are they not referencing they are leaking to the press and what does that mean? how profound is that? >> i don't think we know entirely. but congressional investigators have a strong suspicion thatth these .2 and operation into the fbi that was leaking information, tracking down reporters. there's a whole effort where they are trying to track down the reporter from "the new york times." why would they be trying to do that unless someone wanted to talk to him? i read hundreds of these. i walked away with one thing. i remember the moment whenmb james comey said, fbi agents don't give a rip about politics and they don't leak. after you read his messages come when youes walk away thinking these two fbi agents cared a lot about politics and they were monitoring the media almost like a press office. >> sean: i keep hearing that we will learn a lot more about a connection between some people within the intelligenceco community and the cia and

elsewhere about their relationships with the media. more specific question for the moment has to do with one of the worst parts of this, are they looking at the names of the family, the kids of a particular "new york times" reporter? to that half like his reporting? >> we don't know. these are the questions that the committee members want answers. that is why they want to interview strzok, they want to interview lisa page. remember, this is what we have been looking at, these text messages between the two of them. you also have general counsel james baker, who they want to question, and andrew weissmann, over at the doj. >> sean: what about page is advising mccabe? >> exactly. all of the questions they have regarding the insurance policy with mccabe. they want to question andrew mccabe, the deputy director. >> sean: this is a few hundred texts, a slow release to the

house and senate committee, 9500? >> 9500. they are expected to receive all of those very soon. they want to be slow rolled off. we are expecting a lot by january 11th. >> sean: you see this type ofe leaking. i have followed your comments on this very, very closely. and then you see that the trump-russia collusion narrative is dying and withering on a fine, now they have moved into a collective media bubble that this president, we've got to go to the 25th amendment. what iss your reaction? >> the 25th amendment is irrelevant to what was going on. it was designed for someone who had a stroke or was involved in a serious accident, was incapacitated. it requires a vice president, the cabinet, two-thirds of each house of congress, it's a fool's errand. >> sean: not going to happen? >> of course not. what they are trying to do, not that they couldn't criminalize political differences, they are trying to's psychiatrist

political differences. they are trying to say, we can get him on crime but we can show that he has mental problems, he is disturbed, a guy at cnn today was talking about alzheimer's, he should be subjected to a neurological exam. that is so dangerous. with that is what they did in the former soviet union. i was involved representing some dissidents and the soviet union who were settlement -- sent to mental hospitals. they did that in china. >> sean: >> sean: there was thag speech at harvard? >> i was there. there was a guy who wrote a book about being committed to a psychiatric hospital, and it was a pervasive way that tyrannical governments used the power of psychiatry to try to not answer the merits, we don't want to do debate the merits -- they were doing it all the time. the american psychiatric association sent a delegation,

the goldwateram case, said it is wrong for any psychiatrist ever to diagnose anybody without them examining them. i taught law psychiatry for 25 years at harvard. i coedited the textbook and the first rule of psychiatry is you do not diagnose based on political reasons -- >> sean: i read a book about russian mind control, everything you are discussing, it's all true. >> it is so dangerous. you don't like somebody, vote against them. i voted against donald trump.vo i voted for hillary clinton. >> sean: it's the only thing we disagree on. >> but ie am doing it not for y political -- >> sean: you are doing it for my constitutional law perspective. an effort to the constitution. this is a clear and present danger. let me bring john and sara carter back in. you add to that, when you start surveilling, unmasking, you don't minimize, at the new leak raw intelligence, they did that

to general flynn and i am sure, i will but everything i have, that, they said, you either age that you lied to us every going after your source. >> of course. >> and that is what i am hearing from my sources. right now, there are 27 leak investigations at the department of justice. that is triple what theypa had over the last three years. 27 leak investigations. one of those, i guarantee you, as general flynn. the leaks, the classified leaks between general flynn -- >> sean: nobody talks about it anymore. it was a crime. >> it was a major crime. we are looking at those legs and also looking at the inspector general. we are waiting on that inspector general's report -- >> it's only a crime if it's leaking grand jury minutes. just leaking as a violation of their roles but it's not itself a crime. leaking has been a weapon of prosecutors for years. i have had prosecutors tell me implicitly, if you don't plead your client guilty, you will be

shocked at what will come out about him. i am against it, whether it is leaking against hillary clinton or leaking against donald trump. it's wrong. you don't leak. >> sean: john solomon, we only have a small percentage of these, and i am like, wow. if we only have hundreds, and there are thousands, what's next? >> i think the question is, who is going to follow the breadcrumb trail? someone followed it to create the russian narrative. >> sean: great work. when we come back, tomi lahren goes to california and talks to residentsou about being a sanctuary state. you don't want to miss these responses. she thinks she's the boss. she only had me by one grade. we bought our first home together in 2010. his family had used another insurance product but i was like well i've had usaa for a while, why don't we call and check the rates? it was an instant savings

and i should've changed a long time ago. there's no point in looking elsewhere really. we're the tenneys and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today.

>> president trump: we are proudly supp >> we are probably supporting the men and women of law enforcement, including our wonderful i.c.e.e officers and border patrol agents. these are incredible people who endorsed me during the campaign and they are incredible. they are doing a great job at the border, by the way. we are going to end chain migration. we are going to end the lottery system, and we are going to build the wall.

>> sean: we need two or 300 miles of that wall or else by november 2018, so people can see it and believe it. earlier today, the president promising reform to the immigration system, which is so broken. last monday, california became a sanctuary state, when a law took effect preventing state and local police from asking people about their immigration status or from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement activities. fox news contributor tomi lahren hit the streets to ask residents of california to seeli what they think of this new law. watch this. ♪ >> are you aware that california isnc a sanctuary state for illel immigrants? >> of course iat know that. >> how do you feel about her? >> i think it's great. it's been a matter of time. we need immigrants to be protected and i think being a sanctuary state is perfect. >> by every making it difficult for them to become legal? they don't pay their taxes, they

don't do what you complain about constantly on your channel if it's not legal. why not make it legal for them to dodo it? then you'd stop complaining. >> we can't have it both ways. if we are going to benefit from cheap labor, we need to give them the benefits for every american citizen. >> as an immigrant from mexico myself, it's an incredible opportunity for american worker workers. i think it's a good opportunity. >> it's all right. i love it. i'll admit, i have family members of myself that are illegal. just beingar free, you are just trying to be ourselves. >> did you know this is a sanctuary state for illegal immigrants? >> i did. >> what you think about it? >> i think we need to come up with an immigration bill that will solve all of our problems that help immigrants that are here illegally transmit and become u.s. citizens. >> i don't think they should come over here. you've said illegal immigrants?

i think they should stay where they arek at. why did i got to be over here? >> how do you feel about legal immigrants that have done at the right way, paid a lot of money, waited a lot of time to come into the country? do you feel like it invalidates everything they have worked for to let illegal immigrants receive sanctuary? >> i don't think it's fair that you are putting one against the other. i think one came here fairly and one came here and a sense -- >> unfairly? >> in a sense, not such a black and white thing. people came here to feed their families. speak about the laws are not being enforced. it is not also a problem? >> it's an unenforceable law. >> i'm an immigrant and i had to go through process. it took three and half years to come to america. i think everybody should go through aer process. >> sanctuary cities have always been around. they've only become a part of the popular conversation because of the way the right has attempted to fill a nice

immigrants. >> they do it illegally because they don't have the means to get in or a safer way to get in. >> illegal is illegal. wewe want to be compassionate bt we also have the rule of law. >> sean: fox news contributor tomi lahren joins us. wow. that is your state, right? > it is my state, sean. what can i tell you? >> sean: 13.5 income tax rate. in the state -- doesn't texas and florida, they have pretty good infrastructure. better than new york. why is there that overwhelming feeling? is that the california thing? >> to be fair, there are a lot of californians moving to florida and texas and elsewhere because of california, because of the rules and regulations, and because of things like it being a sanctuary state. i got to tell you, breaking news, california is not a lost cause.e i promise you it's not. there are so many undercover conservatives in the state that

i spoke to that are levelheaded that don't like the fact that as a sanctuary state. sometimes,me there are others, though, that are a little bit louder. the squeaky wheel gets the grease. >> sean: why should they get federal tax dollars in any way if they are literally aiding and abetting lawbreaking as a state? >> they absently shouldn't. you have to understand, there are a lot of californians that are into the whole peace, love, welcome everyone unless you are tomi lahren are fox news and then the tune changes, i will tell you those stories later. again, those people in california, they want to be welcoming of everyone, they want to bring everyone in. until you remind them that lega immigrants had to spend money and wait time to get into this country and into the state, and then there tunea changed a lite bit. it was quite fascinating. >> sean: i was interesting inti watched this packet you put together, i'm interested that a lot of people knew about you, knew about fox news coming to our opinions, one guy in

particular, it looks like a black shirt to me, the other guy other guy in the gray shirt, ad i'm thinking, how was their reaction to you and the channel? because they are kind ofd righ. there arear a few of us that are real conservatives that speak and i don't know if they have met one before. >> i want to be fair. we did encounter a lot of really respectable people that like what we do want fox news and like what i do. it was interesting, i spent some time in west hollywood, i don't know if you arere familiar but it's a very liberal area. as they callth it, the epicenter of the resistance. they certainly knew i was and there were some words that i can't repeat a national television that they were screaming at me. they sell the fox news microphone, they weren't thrilled we were there, they told us to get out. i reminded them that they are supposed to be the loving and tolerant to left, welcoming of everyone unless you are fox news or tomi lahren and then you are supposed to get out. interesting the way that works. >> sean: great job, tomi. we really appreciate it.

this b25 hotline is next. it says every time i open my mouth, a kitten dies. wow by that is called. the video of the day is straight ahead. with an adt starter kit professionally installed for only $49.00. call today, and install an adt starter kit that includes security panel, keypad, key fob, entry and motion sensors and for a limited time, get a camera included and installed at no additional cost. that's a $449.00 value, installed, for just $49.00. touch is how we communicate with those we love, but when your psoriasis is bad, does it ever get in the way? embrace the chance of 100% clear skin with taltz. taltz is proven to help people with moderate to severe psoriasis achieve completely clear skin. with taltz, up to 90% of patients

had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. in fact, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms, or if you've received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. ready for a chance at 100% clear skin? ask your doctor about taltz today. and go to taltz.com to learn how to pay as little as $5 a month.

>> time for the video of the >> sean:gh time for the video of the day franchise club brought to you by our good friend, liberal joe and mika brzezinski, who decided to share the terrible strife that she and her elitist friends are forced to endure are brought under the trump presidency, so upsetting. >> i had some friends that went to paris over the holiday and they said they were viscerally -- >> paris? >> paris, france. they said they were viscerally embarrassed to be american. they said it was the first time it was chilling that they didn't want to share it where they were from. >> sean: the vapors, the vapors, the horror. [laughs] mika's friend, i hear there are european countries with loose

immigration laws, maybe they a hugee happy to take chunk in of your income in exce for citizenship. if you're that embarrassed, see youfo later. time for some messages on the hannity hotline. wow. every time i speak, apparently i kill a kitten. listen . >> sean: i don't want to kitten today so i'm not opening my mouth because every time i open it a kitten dies. not really. i love abbott and costello. he was on first? call the hannity hotline. we want to hear from you,

877-225-8587.ha let not your heart be troubled. we'll never be the destroy trump media or establishment. that is our promise.no let not your heart be troubled, here is jesse watters. week. what is this, beat up hannity here? really? >> the same thing as last year. everybody does it. >> you are on the list, too, i'm warning you. >> i'm next. >> congratulations on filling in for laura tonight. watch the five every day. >> this is the "the ingraham angle" and i'm jesse waters in new york in for laura ingraham. we have a great lineup of stories for you tonight. huma abiden is one of hillary clinton's closest friends could be in serious hot water. something she told the f.b.i. under oath doesn't match what was revealed in a batch of her emails. plus