compromise that has majority support from our party. you have to remember and i know i sound like a broken record. a, we want to fix daca. we do want to fix daca. b, we want to fix it while addressing the root cause problems so that we don't have a daca problem again. i mean, that's kind of common sense. that means the security measures that need to accompany any daca solution are necessary so that we have a final fix and not a temporary fix so we don't have the problem down the road again. that's common sense. that's rationale and that will be bipartisan, i believe. nicholson, i haven't seen new a while, sorry. >> another question about the tweets today. and then also the. >> which? just so you know i don't read every tweet. i saw the two today on fisa, is that what you are talking about? >> a lot of tweets -- any rate. there has been questions raised about the president's fitness for the office and qualification.

back in september 2016 he said of course he is qualified. he is the nominee. would it be the worst thing in the world to have a businessman in office? now that you have had 12 months of this, you still stand by it? >> i stand by what i said. you saw on display the meeting he had down at the white house with democrats and republicans on immigration. i think that's the kind of meeting we always have with the president. i'm glad the country got a chance to see that. yeah? >> mr. speaker, does it surprise you that the president of the united states doesn't seem to be aware of his white house's position on this fisa. >> he is aware of it i don't know -- i can't speak to what the tweet was. he is aware of it. we talked about fisa in the past. he know what is 702 is. juan? >> leader mccarthy said yesterday bob goodlat, immigration daca bill. >> i think it is a good bill. we are working on that. i think it's a good bill. look, i think it's important that we start putting ideas on the table. leader mccarthy as you know from the meeting that i just referenced at the white

house last week, the agreement was that the four leaders cornyn, durbin, hoyer, mccarthy would begin negotiations to come up with a daca solution. when people bring ideas to the tables that constructive. that's what goodlat is doing the chairman of the committee that's relevant here along with mccaul. leader mckari daughertyy and the other three leaders based on that meeting and meeting last week constructive. exactly what we should be doing and i'm confident we will get a solution before too long. >> just to follow up on that, you said daca. you said earlier that you expected to be bipartisan. the goodlat bill, i understand you believe it's a good bill but democrats do not, i mean,. >> i don't know the answer to that by the way. i don't know if all democrats are opposed to that. but, shouldn't would he be offering solutions? the goodlat bill is a daca solution. the goodlat bill brings peace of mind to the daca kids also shows security looks like. that's constructive.

the goodlat bill doesn't say don't help daca kids. it doesn't do that it says here is one way to solve this problem and give peace of mind to daca kids. i would like to think people think that's constructive thing to do. >> -- be willing to bring it to the floor. >> anything we can do to pass advance these causes and issue is helpful and constructive to getting a bipartisan agreement thank you. >> sandra: that is it. paul ryan wrapping up that news conference there, starting out talking about the military and the need to fund the military. obviously that deadline to fund the government coming up next friday, january 19th. what was really important was when he finally weighed in, as he was questioned on the fisa program, the house, as you know, just voted to renew the fisa program. paul ryan clarifying this was foreign terrorists. foreign soil, the 702 surveillance program had to renew it. and, of course that is what has happened. jim jordan came on said i vote against it rand paul. no american should have

right taken away #filibuster. we the have more on the show coming on that. moved on to immigration daca compromise is possible. goodlat bill is a good bill. we will have more on immigration reform coming up in a few moments. ♪ >> harris: this is a fox news alert. president trump repeatedly saying there was no collusion with russia. as he explains why he thinks it's not likely he will be interviewed by special counsel robert mueller. this is outnumbered. i'm harris faulkner. again sandra smith. co-host of after the bell on fbn melissa francis. the editor of town hall.com katie pavlich. and joining us today outnumbered we say. former secret service agent. former nypd officer and host of the dan bongino show, dan bongino is here on our show. >> happy to be here. always love it. >> harris: great to see you. we have a lot that's in your wheel house there. >> do we ever. so let's jump into it. shall we?

at a news conference wednesday president trump made new remarks about special counsel robert mueller's investigation. he insisted there was no collusion between his campaign and russia. watch. >> there is collusion but it's really with the democrats and the russians far more than it is with the republicans and the russians. so the witch-hunt continues. there was absolutely no collusion. everybody knows it every committee i have been in office now for 11 months. for 11 months they have had this phony cloud over this administration, over our government. and it has hurt our government. it does hurt our government. it's a democrat hoax that was brought up as an excuse for losing an election that frankly the democrats should have won because they have such a tremendous advantage in the electoral college. we will see what happens. certainly i will see what happens. but, when they have no collusion, and nobody has found any collusion, at any level, it seems unlikely that you would even have an

interview. >> harris: meanwhile members of trump's transition team stepping up scrutiny of mueller's investigation. they allege the mueller's team illegally obtained trump transition team documents and they want more information on a federal employee who they believe was involved in that. a lawyer for the president's transition submitted a freedom of information act request writing, quote: the transition is requesting records demonstrating a career gsa attorney made false statements to the press in an attempt to cover up the unlawful seizure of transition documents by mr. mueller. dan, why is this problematic? >> gosh, where do we start with this case? this is the biggest mess, i'm telling you it's the most explosive scandal. it's getting ready to burst when this whole ig report coming out now. this specific instance about the trump transition emails with gsa, why not get a warrant? i was a federal investigator for 12 years and a local police officer for four. i worked with the police department for four. two years as a cop. why not get a warrant in the

most consequential counter intelligence investigation in american history. >> harris: why not? dan dan why not? basically because this is a hoax. i said to you before this show, we are asking all the wrong questions here. the question d da did h de joura warrant on trump? why get a warrant at all why was the trump team being spied on? no one has pointed out one single predicate crime why trump team has been spied on. >> sandra: katie? >> katie: no one period mike flynn being one of them. when it comes to getting the warrant, there were questions still about susan rice's role, who was the former national security advisor to president obama. the ambassador to the u.n., samantha power allegedly was involved in this unmasking. so those are the questions still that we don't have the answers to. but when it comes to

collusion and robert mueller and whether the president will speak to him, he has been criticized over the last day or so because he said in the summer of last year that he would testify 100 percent and talk to robert mueller. that was before indictments were coming down for things unrelated to what this investigation was supposed to be about. and if i was donald trump's attorney i wouldn't have him talking to him either. >> melissa: seems like very foolish to go in and talk. for people in our audience hard to know what's going on so confusing. for us it's very hard to sort through. it's frustrating that we seem to be conflating and putting together the idea of not spying on american citizens. i mean, you can imagine the abuse that could go on at the same time we're trying to stay safe from terror. >> harris: one thing that we know is that the president isn't saying that you don't have to imagine what could happen if there were abuse through the fisa program because he feels, dan, that, in fact, he was part of that scoop up through the fisa program where they were listening in.

>> melissa: seems like no doubt. >> harris: americans he being one of them was caught up. >> let me point out three quick things here if there was a fight warrant why did james comey. why did jim clamp on the record on meet the press say there was no fisa warrant and number three what was the predicate crime that started the largest spying separation in u.s. history? >> melissa: what would it be? >> the obama administration needed to dirty up trump officials in a set up in the event he was elected as president. >> sandra: if everything you are say something true the other side says sit down have him talk to mueller. >> he would be crazy to do that. because mike flynn got arrested on a false statements charge to the fbi on a transcript they had of a conversation where jim clapper, the dni said there was no warrant to even monitor. explain that. >> harris: when someone says to you it sounds like conspiratorial, what do you say? >> say look at them look at the james comey testimony in front of congress when he

acknowledges ongoing counter intelligence in 2016. when asked why he didn't notify congress he said well it was sensitive. whole purpose notifying congress. tell me how there wasn't an investigation going on. look it up. >> harris: dan bongino you are on fire on twitter and now on outnumbered. thank you. some house democrats are set to make a statement during president trump's upcoming state of the union address. they say they will be raising awareness for the me too movement, but is it the best idea to take a page right out of hollywood's playbook on that? and president trump and republicans say they want to make a deal to protect the dealers. even some democrats appear to be on board with that. but liberal activists say well, they may be holding them back. that's next. i have type 2 diabetes.

i'm trying to manage my a1c, and then i learn type 2 diabetes puts me at greater risk for heart attack or stroke. can one medicine help treat both blood sugar and cardiovascular risk? i asked my doctor. he told me about non-insulin victoza®. victoza® is not only proven to lower a1c and blood sugar, but for people with type 2 diabetes treating their cardiovascular disease,

victoza® is also approved to lower the risk of major cv events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. and while not for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. (announcer) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck or symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing, or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. change the course of your treatment.

ask your doctor about victoza®. almost $800 when we switched our auto and home insurance. with liberty, we could afford a real babysitter instead of your brother. >>hey. oh, that's my robe. >>is it? when you switch to liberty mutual, you could save $782 on auto and home insurance and still get great coverage for you and your family. call for a free quote today. you could save $782 when liberty stands with you. liberty mutual insurance.

>> sandra: fox news alert. drama on the house floor over a critical national security program that allows spy agencies to collect intelligence on foreign targets abroad. today, the house voted to reject an amendment that would have imposed new restrictions on the fisa

program. and they reauthorized it as is. earlier president trump appeared to complicate the process. he sent a tweet criticizing fisa and then he tweeted in support of it here's the first one. house votes on controversial fisa act today. this is the act that may have been used with the help of the discredited and phony dossier to so badly surveil and abuse the trump campaign by the previous administration and others. then two hours later he tweeted with that being said, i have personally directed the fix to the unmasking process since taking office and today's vote is about foreign surveillance of foreign bad guys on foreign land. we need it. get smart. privacy advocates had called for curves on how fisa collects information on american citizens. earlier today democrats called for a delay in the vote saying the president created confusion. did he? >> no, absolutely not. the president in the united states and some of his representatives on the trump

team were unquestionably surveilled, unmasked and recorded. this is on the record. yet the odni under obama. the director of national intelligence is on the record saying there was no warrant. let me ask you this, sandra, you have a recording that randomly shows up out there. a transcript of a conversation had you and no one could tell if you there was a warrant or you committed a crime. i don't blame them. >> katie: that's why i think the president's messages are confusing. for a year now questions what happened during the trump transition team as the a result of transition team members going to work in the white house. speaking with people on foreign soil this fisa agreement covers, right? it scoops up american citizens who are talking to them. so all show this targets people on foreign soil, american citizens can still be unmasked and listened to. so the president is saying this may have been used against his campaign, that is true. at the same time, it doesn't actually change that to address the problem in the

ledge legislative -- >> harris: once they scoop you up and unmask you it could be on the smallest thing it makes prosecution so much easier that comes into the evidence the way it's been explained to me by legal experts. the other issue is whether or not and you look at the two tweets whether or not there is a conversation about who wants anything to happen on their watch, dan? >> sandra: so the speaker of the house was asked multiple questions by reporters as we were sitting here few moments ago as he held that press availability. one does the president know what fisa is he responded he is aware of it, he knows what fisa is and then he was asked does he understand it paul ryan says he just has concerns about other parts of fisa. he went on to say it is well known he has concerns about fisa. he put out something that clarifies that to your point. >> you want this summed up by one tweet by congressman amash, get a warrant. you going to surveil an american citizen anywhere in the world. get a warrant. show the p.c., the probable cause and get a warrant i

understand of story. >> harris: the moment you hear that voice on the other line. once have you sond and there is an american in that mix, you need a warrant. and senator rand paul told me yesterday the problem with not getting one and the slippery slope that that reveals is the fact that you just put so much hands in the power of a government that can't even look at all the information that it's gathering on all of us. >> sandra: yep. we have another fox news alert for you. ♪ >> that will include the wall. we need the wall for security. we need the wall for safety. we need the wall for stopping the drugs from pouring in. i would imagine that the people in the room both president and republican i really believe they are going to come up with a solution to the daca program going on a long time and maybe beyond that immigration as a whole. any solution has to include the wall because, without the wall, it all doesn't work. >> sandra: that was president trump yesterday insisting that any bill to protect dreamers must include funding for his promised border wall.

this as a bipartisan group of lawmakers say they're closing in on an agreement on immigration reform. potentially as early as this week. democratic congressman steny hoyer who is a part of that group sounding optimistic just this morning. >> we had a meeting yesterday with mcin carte, senator durbin, senator cornyn and myself to try to get the process which we can discuss the issues that both sides want to discuss. we believe central to the any action we take is the protection of the dealers. i think there a s. a consensus. overwhelming majority of the house. majority of the senate who all, once a bill gets to the floor, which protects dealers will vote for it. >> sandra: he was sitting next to the president at that meeting earlier this week. meanwhile there has reportedly been a riff in the democratic party as negotiators are under pressure from activists and other constituencies who fear they will give too much

to republicans in a dealers deal. and this is nothing new for democrats. you may remember house minority leader nancy pelosi was heckled last september during a news conference by activists accusing the party of not fighting hard enough to predict illegals from deportation. >> yes, i am. yes i am. you do not. [shouting you are a liar] >> you don't know what you are talking about. >> you are a liar. you are a liar. >> sandra: we all remember that moment, right? mike emanuel joins us now from capitol hill on the latest on the ongoing negotiations. hello, michael. >> sandra, good afternoon to you. there has been a serious push here on capitol hill trying to address the complicated issue of immigration. today, the house majority leader kevin mccarthy blasted the house democratic leader for forcing the issue now. >> nancy pelosi has been holding the country hostage.

she has been trying to shut the government down over an issue that does not expire until march we're showing good faith walking down to solve this problem. you can't address damascus da ca by itself. you will be right back in the same situation in another year. >> four house republicans rolled out own immigration plan late yesterday. they say bill provides daca recipients, those brought to this country illegally by their parents a reasonable solution strong antifraud measures and ensures they do not get a special path to citizenship. giving them the opportunities three years for eternity legal status here to be able to work, go to school, travel and take the existing path that we have in our system to citizenship and not go ahead of anybody else. >> there are also efforts, bipartisan efforts on the senate side of the capital trying to address this complicated issue of immigration. >> there will always be

sticking points. we have to compromise. it's not a bill i would have written by myself or lindsey graham would have written by himself. we have tried to meet the president's criteria of things that are important to include i think we are very close to doing that. >> also today the senate democratic leader talked about the types of security his side is willing to accept. >> democrats are interested in a effective practical border security measures. we want what secures the border the most. not what sounds the best. not what is a political slogan in a campaign, but what actually protects our border. >> democrats believe they have leverage so they want this issue addressed now. republicans say there is no rush. they still have time before the president's march deadline. sandra? >> sandra: mike emanuel, thank you for that report. a lot to work off of there. katie, you heard chuck schumer say we want what is best to protect the border. >> katie: we want real border security said the democrat chuck schumer which is totally not true.

they want open borders. they are being pushed by open border illegal immigration groups not to compromise here. but here's the deal. democrats have already agreed to everything that was in the house bill that was introduced yesterday they already worked on the gang of 8 which ended chain migration and visa lottery program. many of them including chuck schumer voted for the 2006 the secure fence act which gas essentially the same thing. trump just called it a wall. didn't mean fencing in every single mile of the border it meant putting it where it works and it does work. we have seen in arizona they put a fence at the huma sector illegal crossings and drug cartel loads coming through there went down by 98% as a result of that wall. and the daca thing, 70% of the country agrees on daca. nobody can agree on anythin anything. >> harris: watched that 55 minute televised meeting you got to see some of the back and forth.

you saw representative of texas had charts and figures. of course, look how long the border is along his state. so you got to see some of that back and forth. i think it's disingenuous for critics to look at this process now and say they can't get somewhere. and i wonder how much of the base they are mad at nancy pelosi. they bum rushed. i don't even call it heckling. it's like old school like stepped up on her and called her a liar with live microphones and phones up and everything. they are angry with the democrats not solving this issue already. >> i was talking to david koeller yesterday. i hope he doesn't get mad for sharing me. manufacturing. he was talking about the dramatic labor shortage in this country. that we need labor. they are so frustrated about we need to straighten out our legal immigration system. you know, talking about people who want to come, who want to work. they need the workers, but this has gotten so political such a mess and not having honest conversation about

how to have the labor in the country that we need. do it legally, do the right way. bring people in not based on all this other stuff people have skills and want to work. >> harris: when you bring up merit-based people get so offended by that they say you are going to leave people out of the loop dan dan deal is never going to happen. democrats aren't going to give trump victory on immigration. >> sandra: what about the president in that meeting saying i'm going to sign what you put on my desk. >> harris: he said i have confidence. >> tell you why it's not going to happen. the argument speaks to the downfall of the democratic party. they refer to americans as deplorables and refers to everybody else outside of america coming here illegally -- >> sandra: going to bend too far the other way in trying to incorporate daca. >> the dems will never give them a win no way on this. >> sandra: have to leave it there. high stakes decision looming many of them obviously. this one whether president trump will effectively end the obama era iran nuclear deal.

now the supreme leader is in iran issuing a direct threat at the united states. plus, growing questions over that anti-trump dossier and whether the obama administration used it to justify spying on the trump campaign. patrick woke up with a sore back.

but he's got work to do. so he took aleve this morning. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. tylenol can't do that. aleve. all day strong. all day long. check this sunday's paper for extra savings on products from aleve. alright, i brought in high protein to help get us moving. ...and help you feel more strength and energy in just two weeks!

i'll take that. -yeeeeeah! ensure high protein. with 16 grams of protein and 4 grams of sugar. ensure. always be you. not in this house. 'cause that's no average family. that's your family. which is why you didn't grab just any cheese. you picked up kraft mozzarella with a touch of philadelphia for lasanyeah! kraft. family greatly.

layers hairs president trump and top g.o.p. lawmakers are demanding answers just one day after a top democratic senator released some transcripts of an interview with the founder of the firm behind the so-called anti-trump dossier. now top lawmakers are saying why stop there? senator lindsey graham tweeted it's not enough to simply release the transcript from the co-founder of fusion gps glenn simpson. i want the entire story regarding fusion gps, thes to yea, and the department of justice to be revealed.

and congressman mark meadows tweeted did the fbi take the clinton paid for dossier to the fisa court in 2016 and use it to spy on the trump campaign? we have asked for the fisa application and they won't tell us. you know, this is kind of in part what you were talking about. >> the dossier at this point clear as day used to get a is a warrant to cover for already ongoing set up of the trump team. it's clear as day. let me ask you this, put this time line together, all publicly available information. why does mike rogers of the nsa visit trump tower on november 17th and tell nobody about it? mysteriously the next day the trump team disappears up to bedminster, new jersey, the following day the obama team which already doesn't like mike rogers is all of a sudden calling for him to leave. do you seriously believe that's all coi coincidental. he told trump this was ongoing and spying on him. i'm tell you obama spied on trump. it's just a question of why and who started it. >> harris: i'm looking at katie react to you.

so i want to get one-on-one reaction there. >> i think dan bongino know as lot more and has sourcing outside of what i have at the moment. but we do know going back to the dossier there are questions that were asked of the department of justice rod rosenstein who is in charge of the special counsel was asked directly if the fbi paid for it. he refused to answer that question. he was also asked if the fbi used it to obtain that fisa warrant. he refused to answer that question as well. he it's he doesn't know the answer we just weren't told whether that was the case or not. melissa? >> melissa: this is really scary stuff. it's the logical extension of what everybody always worries about. you put these things in place in order to keep americans safe and then do politicians use it for their own political purposes to spy on each other. it seems like we have clear evidence in here that is what it was used for. it's just terrifying as an american citizen at the same time we have to balance that with this idea simultaneously true that we have to protect americans from terror.

>> harris: according to people like senator rand paul and others against not being able to separate our freedoms from scooping up information to protect us, they say it doesn't take that long to get a warrant. it's not like you are slowing the process down so much that you are going to leave it waylaid open for anyone to come and reek terror on all of us. >> i have sworn to warrants ithey are not difficult to get. to this day nobody can answer why they were chasing trump. let me ask you one thing about the testimony peer. simpson said something in that testimony that's damning. i don't know if anybody picked up on it he said the investigation started and he went to the fbi because he had some information on an inside source in the trump campaign, which he acknowledges is the "new york times" reported story of papadopoulos meeting with the australian foreign minister who says he fed it to american intel. >> sandra: let me ask you a question though when you said what about manafort? i mean, somebody who was -- you know everyone was

suspicious from the get-go russian dealings is that the not enough. >> all of those were prior business dealings ukraine in conjunction with lobbying. >> harris: it touches on what you were say from the "wall street journal" democrats in the media seized on and that would be glenn simpson' claim that the dossier supported information the fbi already had if from a human source from inside the trump organization. turns out he wasn't referring to a confidential informant from within the trump team but the fact that the fbi had been tipped off by a foreign diplomat about a trump staff, george papadopoulos. so, the "wall street journal" also echoing what you are saying. >> here's the kicker in that the foreign diplomat in the "new york times'" own reporting says he reported it to american intel agencies. how did that get to fusion gps? they are not intelligence officers? fusion gps was deputized by the obama team. >> katie: probably through the fbi. they won't answer that question. he was asked in his testimony, glenn simpson

were new touch with the fbi? did the fbi use your information as part of the investigation? he refused to answer the question. >> harris: all of this is public record by the way. you may be able to tie some strings and loops together from your, you know, sourcing. >> i had some help. probably have gifts the rest of us don't have. >> sandra: we are awaiting a decision from president trump on whether to recertify the iran nuclear deal and continue waiving sanctions against the regime. he has made it clear he does not like that deal. meantime, widespread protests continue in iran. and the white house is denouncing iran's to protesters writing quote we will not remain silent as the iranian dictatorship represses the basic rights of its citizens and hold iran's leaders accountable for any violations. iran's supreme leader tweeting in response quote u.s. officials should know that firstly, they have missed their target physical

they target iran again they will fail. second lid they have inflicted damage upon iran in recent days and they should know this won't be left without a response. your conclusion from that is what, dan? >> someone should tell iranians we have iran deal they don't seem to know that based on continued pursuit of nuclear weapons. the defense against not pursuing future sanctions is week. folks said unilateral, other folk also still do business ongoing with iranian. united states is the world leader. we are the 800-pound gorilla in the room it's time to say enough is enough. >> sandra: will the president recertify this deal, melissa? >> melissa: i hope he does not. this seems like the exact moment to put as much pressure on iran as you possibly can when you look at the protests that are going on and you see the fact that, you know, coca cola and apple iphones were supposed to change minds inside iran. that didn't happen. none of the money made it to the right people. all the things that you would have predicted once again there is an

opportunity. there's a movement within the country and this would be the exact time to apply as much pressure as possible. >> harris: there is counter thought on that though, is that you want to give that movement time to breathe. because that also happened. >> katie: i think there is a window of time where the united states has been very forceful in condemning the regime and backing the protesters because there is only a limited amount of time. >> harris: backing the protesters. >> katie: in terms of the protests the way they were started and the crux of that has a direct connection to the iran nuclear deal. people in iran are very upset that all of the money that the united states gave iran as part of this deal didn't go to the people of iran to help their economy, to help people on the ground. to help the middle class. it went to funding terrorism and hezbollah and sending missiles into yemen to be sent into saudi arabia. one more thing on this on the background of the president's decision-making on this and whether he will recertify it. there are two questions. do they have questions that iran is directly violating the nuclear agreement? right now they do not.

what they do have evidence of that is that they are violating the era and the spirit of the deal which is ballistic missile testing, threatening the united states,. >> harris: sending weapons to yemen. >> katie: not necessarily. >> harris: nikki haley showed us at the united nations, dan, she has invited other nations to come. can you come and look at the markings fall short of made in iran on some of those weapons in yemen. >> you have to remember the deal for some folks are confused on the deal. the deal did not stop the iranians from making nuclear weapons. it extended out a time line much the key component of the deal that everybody should have openly mocked when obama signed it is oh by the way we are not allowed to pursue inspections of their military facilities without them telling. where would you produce a nuclear weapon? >> katie: let -79s not forget the obama administration admitted john kerry and president obama a lot of this money we are giving them will probably go to terrorism attacking the

united states but we don't really care much. >> harris: just remind everybody one of those weapons that had those iran markings landed at public airport with passengers where people were flying back and forth in saudi arabia. >> sandra: golden globes highlighted sexual harassment now some democrats are reportedly moving to take the me too movement directly to the stunel address. does their plan go too far? we shall debate. ♪

you might take something for your heart... or joints. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. he gets the best deal on the perfect hotel by using. tripadvisor! that's because tripadvisor lets you start your trip on the right foot...

by comparing prices from over 200 booking sites to find the right hotel for you at the lowest price. saving you up to 30%! you'll be bathing in savings! tripadvisor. check the latest reviews and lowest prices.

they cahow many of 'em?e, sir! we don't know. dozens. all right! let's teach these freaks some manners! good luck out there, captain! thanks! but i don't need luck, i have skills... i don't have my keys. (on intercom) all hands. we are looking for the captain's keys again. they are on a silver carabiner. oh, this is bad. as long as people misplace their keys, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. >> sandra: democrats hoping to seize on the me too movement are reportedly planning to invite victims

of sexual assault to the state of the union address later this month. this as somehow democrats are already planning to wear black to show solidarity with the movement including democratic congresswoman jackie expire who told nbc news that it's all part of a, quote culture change that is sweeping the country and congress is embracing it. their plan echos actresses at last sunday's gholden globe's award who wore black to bring attention to the issue amid a series of sexual misconduct scandals that have rocked hollywood as well as washington. katie, what do you think? >> katie: i'm going to try to temper my reaction here. i think it's a good thing that they are bringing victims of sexual assault to show this does happen and there are real people who are at the basis of these stories that we keep hearing. however, hypocrisy level on this from hollywood to the democratic party is unskyrocketting just unbelievable. start with hollywood this

all wear black thing. hollywood for 30 years has been debasing society by pushing the sex all-ization of young people through the television screen. they repeatedly fought for ratings on movies to be lowered as they put sexual content into every single part of our lives. you can't watch a tv show now without having that in. and then have you democrats who glorify people as early as the 2012 dnc convention like ted kennedy and said he was a women's rights champion when he literally left a woman to drown in his car. so for them now to have this moment i'm glad that maybe they have decided they want to make this an issue, but just a couple weeks ago they were regretting that maybe they jumped the gun with al franken in asking for him to resign. what is the end goal here? is there going to be a solution to this problem or are we just going to dress up in different colors and act like we care? end game is important point, too. i saw such a love for the idea among democrats and some of them and hollywood

people who were. oprah winfrey, do you know how much pictures and meals now are out with oprah winfrey and harvey weinstein. can you have a friend. she is kissing him on the cheek and those are peoples. lock, it's going to exist. she was part of hollywood. she has made blockbuster films and has an oscar. the question though when you saw it from seal, a man asking in the industry of music why is it that oprah never spoke up before for all of these women? >> melissa: there is hypocrisy on both sides of this. you say republicans are. look at republicans on the wrong side of this. i just wonder i like the awareness but i wonder how hard is it to wear black? >> harris: i don't have a political reason. >> melissa: how much of a sacrifice is that? put up a few women at the oscars who came out and wore

red i'm sorry at the golden globes. we have a picture of them as well. didn't wear black or whatever it was. >> sandra: this is a great point to raise only three women showed up at award ceremony not wearing black when asked about it we think there is more to it than what we are wearing or not wearing. and it's a fair point. right? i mean, again, the movement taking on a whole new mind of its own to where it's not even addressing the root of the problem. >> ladies, hollywood gave a standing ovation to roman polanski. there is just a report recently. >> woody allen. >> behind the scenes, the mechanical portions of hollywood. not the front stage portion where people see you, that women are vastly underrepresented in this so-called, you know, liberal enclave. >> harris: look at the new money movie out and you look at the change and the difference in how the men were paid and how the female actors were paid? unbelievable. >> if trump were smart. >> harris: hairs all the money in the world.

>> sandra: we solved it shown live. that's the word from nbc when it comes to showing players taking a knee during the national anthem. this is the next month's super bowl whether this is the right course and should we expect a fiery tweet from the president if this happens? we will debate. >> we want our flag respected and we want our national anthem leadership respected also. ♪ ♪

>> sandra: we're outnumbered in just a moment. head up to harris. >> harris: will we get a deal on daca and immigration reform by next week's budget deadline with some democrats and republicans giving mixed signals i will ask the chairman of the senate g.o.p. conference senator john thune about it the house is voting just a short time ago on what many sees a a key tool against terrorism, the fisa surveillance law. we have been talking about it this hour. but what about questions of security versus privacy? i will ask renowned constitutional expert alan dershowitz all about it overtime ot top of the hour. sandra? >> sandra: all right. thank you, harris. >> katie: just days after president trump stood for the national anthem at the college football championship, the producers

of the upcoming super bowl say they will show it if nfl players take a knee. nbc executive producer of the event saying, quote: when you are covering a live event, you are covering what's happening. if there are players who choose to kneel, they will be shown live. didn't half of their viewers just turn off the dial for the super bowl weekend? find something else to do? >> yeah, we are covering a live event too going on two years now which is the destruction of the nfl brand. i promise you this will be taught in business schools from this point on as an episode of what not to do to keep your goodwill and brand equity. this is a disgrace. >> melissa: what do you want them to do? do you want them to turn their cameras away. >> i want to tell people get off your damn knees and stand up for the anthem that people died for in this country. you want to protest, go out and do it on your own time. this sour field and our brand. stand and put your hand on the heart or-million-dollar salary is getting flushed down the toilet bowl. have a nice day.

>> katie: yelling at me. what about on the business side of this? it seems like the nfl has had significant drops in business but roger goodell doesn't seem too concerned about the tv ratings that we have seen? >> melissa: no. he is still making incredible fortune. i don't know, it's interesting. i think more and more people are watching it on delay. i mean, at my household, you know, we wait until the game has already started and then we turn it on. we don't even. >> katie: watch it on delay? >> melissa: yes. >> katie: i come from a sports family. my great aunt was sports director at the university of arizona for 30 years. when dvr would first came out start recording games multiple occasions where the end of the game would get cut off during march madness and it was the worse. >> melissa: i don't watch the whole thing like that i just start. >> sandra: i don't know what obligation the television networks have but i think their point is, i'm not defending it. their point is we have got our cameras on the game.

this is a part of the game. we will show every bit of it. >> katie: dan, what about that going into the next season? this is now a two-year long process. once the season is over the question next year when it starts will we genesee this phenomenon of players deciding to kneel? do coaches need to step in in the locker room and say we're going to show a little bit more respect for our flag. if you don't like it, deal with it, stand up and get your business done. >> if they don't fix this problem, can i almost guarantee new four or five years that the nfl is going to be the field hockey of modern sports. i love field hockey but people aren't paying millions of dollars to go see it. >> katie: were you a football fan before this happened? >> i was a raiders and ravens fan. it destroyed my soul to not watch the super bowl last year. nfl and me are absolutely completely divorced. >> sandra: we had exnfler who sat on the couch. >> katie: who was that. >> sandra: i won't say it o

now because he said it off camera. >> katie: more outnumbered in just a moment. insurance company. with new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car plus depreciation. liberty mutual insurance. having mplaque psoriasise is not always easy. it's a long-distance run. and you have the determination to keep going. humira has a proven track record of being prescribed for nearly 10 years. humira works inside the body to target and help block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to symptoms. in clinical trials, most adults taking humira were clear or almost clear and many saw 75% and even 90% clearance in just four months. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal, infections and cancers, including lymphoma have happened as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb.

tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. join over 250,000 people who have chosen humira. ask about the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists. humira & go. wgreat tasting, heart-healthys the california walnuts.ever? so simple, so good. get the recipes at walnuts.org.

>> sandra: many thanks to dan bongino, it's always good to have you on the couch. >> dan: did we cover a lot of material today or what? >> katie: thank you for your insider information, we appreciate that very much. >> sandra: thank you for joining us every day at noon

eastern time. and now, here's harris. >> harris: we begin with a fox news alert, awaiting remarks from president trump this hour and he may mention some drama that played out on capitol hill. following his tweets on the renewal of a controversial spying program. the house passed a long-term extension of the foreign intelligence surveillance act but it did not have the major changes recommended by privacy advocates. rand paul promises to filibuster it on the senate side to try to block it. we will talk to alan dershowitz about what this means for the american people, so watch for that. a big push under way on capitol hill to tackle immigration ahead of a looming government shutdown next friday. let's go "outnumbered overtime," i'm harris faulkner. top lawmakers from both political parties backed by the white house have kicked off their search for a long-sought compromise on immigration, with the clock ticking down ahead