of lying, pomposity, smugness, and especially groupthink. dvr it if you know how it works. more than anything, stay tuned. buckle your seat belt ladies and gentlemen. sean hannity is live from new york next. >> sean: great show as always. welcome to "hannity." we have massive new breaking developments tonight. the fbi agent peter struck make the stunning admission about the brush investigation in these latest newly released text messages. before even joining robert mueller's team, strzok said there was "no big they are-they are" proving that president trump has been right about the entire russian investigation from the start. it is a complete hoax, it is planning to shut down molars partisan and very corrupt witch hunt, and also tonight, i suspect what we are seeing happening is a special counsel and a team that are leaking information to "the new york times" and "washington post." why they want to distract the media and you the american people because the heat is now on. i will explain. also congressman trey gowdy is

revealing that the day after president trump's election and his win struck in his fbi lawyer mistress talked about a "secret society" within the fbi. is this a banana republic? and the doj that could have been working against donald trump from november 9, 2016 2016 on? at representative gaudi is also saying there is a text between strzok and page about destroying all their messages. we've seen this movie before. congressional republicans are now moving forward with a plan to publicly release that classified memo that highlights massive fisa abuse. sources are telling fox news tonight that it could happen any day. we are asking your help, those of you watching. help make this happen. tell your members of congress to release the memo. #releasethememo. all of that into nights opening monologue. tonight continues.

we have a lot of brand-new information to share with you, the truth about the russian investigation is being exposed as a sham. a democratic political operation, and it has now turned into a witch hunt. the entire basis of robert mueller so-called investigation is based and predicated on a y and a conspiracy theory that was cooked up by the obama administration by democrats, and by your liberal news media as an excuse for why hillary clinton lost the election. that was never supposed to happen. for over a year, what has been? trump. russia. trump. rush appeared collusion. collusion. collusion. we have no evidence today. the only evidence we do have tonight is that hillary clinton bought and paid for a salacious phony document filled with russian lies to try and influence all of you during that election. that's what mueller should really be looking into. instead, his investigation is now morphed into a democratic political hit job to remove a duly elected president from

office and use the powerful tools of intelligence and the fisa courts to do it. now is more damaging information coming out every day, it looks like special counsel and robert mueller and his partisan hacks, they are trying now to change the narrative with their lame stream media friends with selective leaking today. everyone of them is a nonstory, not worthy of your attention, unless you work for the fake news media. before we get to tonight's new information. remember this. comey is a corrupt as they come. he gave those memos to the columbia professor for the very purpose of leaking to the press that a special counsel would be appointed, hoping that this would all come to pass. comey also reportedly coordinated his congressional testimony with robert mueller. that sounds like collusion. in spite of these facts, the delusional comey is actually trying to fashion himself as a martyr, as he recently tweeted. go to reports or people standing

up for what they believe them. then a quote to dr. martin luther king jr. the ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience but where he stands in times of challenge and controversy. wait a minute? he put the fixing so hillary wouldn't be charged in spite of the evidence he knew existed. this is an embarrassment, and national disgrace, and beyond laughable. he deserved to be fired. we will explain why in a minute. also tonight, we have more evidence of just how fraudulent, unethical, and nefarious molars investigation really is. here are the new texts released today which confirms everything we have been telling you. on may 19th, 2 days after robert mueller appointed the special counsel, strzok writes to page, you and i both know the odds are nothing. if i thought it was likely, i'd be there no question. i hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern is no big they there-there.

many trump-russia collusion. strzok was a high-ranking intelligence official at the fbi the specialized and russia, signed the paperwork to start the entire russian investigation knowing there is no there-there. in other words, it's always been a hoax. this proves it. it's part of an attempt to stop trump from winning and removing him from office. if it means breaking the law and the intelligence committee, so be it. we never should have gone down this road. the mainstream media and their hacks and the media, cnn, msnbc, every broadcast channel, "washington post," they have been giving you nothing but lies and propaganda now for a year. those involved, those responsible for crimes were committed are now trying to cover it up. they are not going to get away with it. when everything is said and done, this is going to make watergate look like a kids stealing candy from a store. we reported yesterday, five months of text messages are

missing between strzok and page. here's what happened during this critical time frame. this is from december 14th, 2016 to may 17th, 2017. in march, president trump claimed that there were wiretapping at tower. we broke that nearly a year ago right here on this program. then bus feed published the story that is at five missing months that clinton bought and played for the dossier. that was in january pete alda said in the text stop. that was used in part and later on to get the visor want to spy on the trim campaign. lieutenant general michael fan is interviewed by the fbi and what would luck habit, it was peter strzok who actually was the official that oversaw that interview. on may 9th, the fbi director james comey was a fire. then on may 17th, robert mueller was named a special counsel. those are the major events, and how conveniently, it happens is

that the messages, some 50,000 of them, this is the time. period where strzok and page height back 's were missing. they's blade on samsung who supplied the phones. you gotta be kidding me. it's the fbi who specializes in intelligence and gathering. they can't find the messages? i don't believe that's possible. giving the inherent antitrust bias that we have seen from strzok and page, they hated trump, and their involvement in almost everything involving the russian investigation, well, we must now know what they were talking about during these five critical months, the fbi should find those messages, maybe make a call to samsung. if you can get it, i bet they can. there's also stunning new revelation tonight about these missing text messages. congressman trey gowdy is saying there is a message between strzok and page about deleting these text conversations. you can't make this up for a novel. a look at this new information.

>> lay inside this glaring five month gap and text that the world's premier law enforcement agency somehow missed. lay that aside. what we have seen, what i saw today was a text about not keeping taxes. we saw more manifest bryant's against president trump all the way through the election into the transition. >> sean: hatred against trump, bias against trump, and not keeping the text messages. that sounds like obstruction of justice. it's not the first time that we've all seen this happen. every single solitary time the obama administration and other officials are backed into a corner and in serious legal trouble, all of the evidence magically disappears. this is their operand i. hillary clinton 33,000 subpoenaed emails deleted. just to make extra extra sure, acid watch bleach date, the whole entire car drive to make sure the evidence is completely

destroyed. in case it made it to any of the mobile devices, they send and ate out with a hammer. boom! let's match that sucker. the only phones i gave the fbi, they had no same cards. i'm sure it was just an accident. do you believe that? a bridge to nowhere. there's also the irs can targeting conservatives. the email from corrupt officials. they disappeared for two years. the irs claimed at the time they were lost because of a system crash. we can't forget about debbie wasserman schultz and the reports of smashed hard drives in his garage. predictably, they denied it happen. this is a lot to take in. let me slow down here. there's even more new information tonight. we will be giving it to you throughout the hour. according to congressman john ratcliffe, strzok and page were also talking about, imagine thi this, a secret society meeting

the day after president trump won the election. whose in the secret society? could it be page? strzok? mccabe? comay? bruce ohr? rob rubenstein? who is in the special secret society? are they supposed to be transparent. watch this. >> we learned today about information that after an immediate aftermath of the elections, there may have been a secret society of folks within the department of justice and fbi to include page and strzok that would be working against them. and i i to actually happen, but folk speak in those terms, they need to come forward to explain the contacts in which they spoke those terms. >> sean: they said there's no concrete evidence yet that the secret society ever met. here's what we do know. strzok and page and who we think is a deputy fbi director andrew mccabe were meeting about the insurance policy, just in case

hillary lossy election. all of the other evidence points to one simple fact. top ranking obama administration officials and the department of justice, fbi, not rank-and-file. the top people. they protected hillary clinton from prosecution. then they use that phony russian dossier that hillary bought paid four full of russian salacious wise to go after the trump campaign to try and influence the election. as we have now been saying for months, the fix was in and the clinton email investigation. why? they wanted hillary to run and didn't want trump to win. here's another text message from peter strzok and lisa page appears to show that they and obama's attorney general about loretta lynch, they all knew that wouldn't be prosecuted. before they ever interviewed clinton or the other main

participants and all of this, they didn't do the investigation. remember in may, james comey and peter strzok, and other top fbi officials, they were drafting the exoneration of hillary months before they ever interviewed her and several other key witnesses. how can you actually exonerate someone to be forever to them? that's called the fix it being in. that's being read. that is corruption 101. let's take a look at james comey, denying under oath that he reached his legal conclusion before hillary clinton. we have all the different drafts all pointing toward a case of hillary being guilty. watch this. >> director, did you make the decision not to recommend criminal charges related to classified information before or after hillary clinton was interviewed by the fbi on july the second? >> after. colleagues of ours believe i am lying about when i made this

decision, please urge them to contact me privately so we can have a conversation about this. all i could do is tell you again. the decision was made after that because i didn't know what was going to happen in the interview. she may be allied in the interview during the way we could prepare to be what i will call your number. i have a lot of questions for you. it sounds to me like comey lied under oath. we know we had the drafts and how he was exonerating clinton much before her fbi interview. tonight just breaking, political reporting that congressman ratcliff is saying that he wants to interview comey again under oath about all these inconsistencies in his previous testimony. let's go back to the timeline. at the end of june 2016, bill clinton decides to meet loretta lynch on the tarmac for 40 minutes and talking about their grandkids. then on july 1st, lynch says she's going to step away from the investigation. she will accept whatever the fbi concludes. she encouraged comey it's a

matter, it's on an investigation. this is all before hillary clinton, three days before she was ever even interviewed, that have been on the fourth of july weekend. after lynch's statement that she was taking a backseat, strzok writes his mistress-girlfriend page, timing looks like hell. page room says that is awful timing. it's a real profile encouraged since she knows no charges will be brought. they had an interview -- had an hillary clinton appeared four days later they finally interviewed hillary clinton on . then comey comes out with what he was already writing in early may and his press conference, giving hillary clinton a pass on everything. paging appears. strzok knew. comey knew. lynch know. i assume mccabe knew as well. nothing was going to happen to hillary because the fix was in.

if lisa page knew, then that probably means she was advising deputy director andrew mccabe. what else are they lying about? were they aware of the fbi is giving clinton cover? if comey, and all the top law enforcement officials new that this was their agreement to not go after clinton because they wanted her in the race to defeat donald trump because they know better than you who should be president, then it's a pretty darn good chance that somebody in the obama white house also was doing the wink and nod thing, and they knew the fix was in. in other words, the fix was in. it wasn't rigged. there is another component to the story. we have even more breaking news tonight about the effort by congressional republicans to release the four-page classified memo. that exposes the fisa abuses against the trump campaign. nearly 200 members of congress have now seen this and fox news is reporting tonight that the memo could be released any day

now. we are still calling on you, the american people, once again. call up your member of congress and demand that the release. release the memo. call the number at the bottom of your screen. tell your members of congress, we deserve to know the truth about what is likely the biggest scandal in american history. there is so much information. so many players involved in all of this. let me tie it together. hillary clinton rigged the primary. if you are bernie sanders supporter, you should be -- why you're not? i don't know. even though it there is a incontrovertible evidence that she broke the law, james comey, andrew mccabe, peter strzok, lisa page, loretta lynch, i'll put the fix in and allowed her to stay in this presidential race. they ignore the rule of law, the constitution, and clinton and the dnc that she controls spend over $12 million to influence the election with a bought and paid for dossier full of russian

lies and propaganda that was shipped off to compliant media. the obama administration weaponize the powerful tools of intelligence that we need to keep our country safe, but in this case, they used it to target members of the trump campaign. this, so you understand, is so much bigger than watergate. it's about our constitution, about the rule of law. it is been shredded. all because powerful people at the highest level in the doj and the fbi thought they knew better than you, as to who should be president. there needs to be serious ramifications if we are going to save our country in all of this. people must be held accountable, they must be investigated, they must be indicted, and probably many of them thrown in jail. ohio congressman jim jordan is with us. sara carter is here with us. am i missing anything here? >> you are not. the central player in this entire drama is the guy you identified, peter strzok.

the first batch of text messages, he talked about the insurance policy in case the american people make donald trump president. this latest batch, he talks about unfinished business. i unleashed it during the midyear exam, which is the code name they had for the clinton investigation. he says i need to finish it and fix it. 4 minutes after that text message, he sent another message to lisa page where he said an investigation had leaked to impeachment. if that doesn't go to their entire motive, their entire plan, what they had in store, and the animus they had for president trump, i don't know what does? as you pointed out in your monologue, peter strzok was the key guy in the clinton investigation. he was the guy who change the exoneration. >> sean: are we going to get to the one-yard line and it dies? in other words, we don't get -- >> we see the building. you can see a building. we can see a building a amongst the members of congress. 200 members of congress have read that memo. 200-0 in favor of releasing it

because this is the kind of thing that is so wrong. when the fbi says this, the fbi is investigating you and you lose important documents or you delete emails or loose text messages -- >> sean: i will be in jail. bring me the cake. let me go to sara carter. it has been almost a year since you and john solomon broke the story about the warrants at trump tower, the investigation. look at where we are today. your thoughts. where are we going? i hear this is just the tip of the sphere. appearance because this is just the tip of the spear. right now, we have peter strzok and lisa page, but they were reporting to someone. we are focused on them, with good reason, but think about the people they were reporting to. i want to know what andrew mccabe, who is the deputy director with texting to others, how he was involved in it. james rybicki, who just left the

fbi. now we know mccabe is leaving in march. there is so much more to this story. the unmasking and director brandon of the cia. >> sean: samantha power, unmasking 300 people. great. what is that power come from? >> where did that come from? and now she says she told trey gowdy that someone signed those unmasking's and her name. to be what i'd like to know who. let's find out who was impersonating the u.n. ambassador and were unmasking americans. fundamentally, dan bongino, this five months gap. this is so much bigger than the watergate tapes. five months, the most critical time. merrick. with your experience in law enforcement and secret service and the new nypd, are we able to retrieve those forensically? i don't believe they are lost. >> let me tell you something. i'm willing to put my credibility behind us on your show tonight.

those messages aren't lost. i absolutely believe this is some kind of canary trap to out them again. we've seen this pattern before pitfalls information put out there to catch people leaking information. we saw it in the donald trump jr. wikileaks stor story. we also sought with the mike flynn story. let me say something here. that five month period back his and important because that's where the logan act confederacy, or what i've been calling a reverse engineering of a crime,n the doj and fbi. listen to me, make the mistake of this. donald trump was set up. this was a sting operation the entire time, and at this logan act conspiracy that hit mike flynn on while they were listening to a call was a legal cover. >> sean: i bet my life on it that was a trap. it was illegal to information they had. when are we going to get the

memo? when do we get it? >> i think soon. i'm hoping even next week. i know i talked to devin nunez. he is committed to making sure the committee calls its hearing. we had that five-day process. i believe that the white house will give us the thumbs up right away. if that passes the community with a majority vote, i think president trump will say let the american people see it. >> he definitely brought up what i was hearing as well. there will be a vote next week. that's what i've been told. after that, it goes to the president. i'm sure he will allow that to go public. >> sean: i hear there's a lot more even coming behind that memo. do both of you glean that? >> yes. i think there will be more memo's, sean. here's the other thing i think is important. why rod rosenstein when he testified just last month, why didn't he tell us they were missing text messages? >> sean: exactly.

bring him back. does he extend that fisa warned? did he extend that? >> i can't get into who did what. i can't get into that. >> sean: my guess is he did. >> rod rosenstein came and testified it was act about the text messages. that was the day before he testified was when we got the first batch of the strzok text messages. the fbi turned them all over. >> sean: he went into paul ryan's office begging not to release any of this. that constitutes the metal. damme and gino lasswell. >> don't discount the name giancarlo either within the doj. he knew it was going on here in in -- this is the connection that i take to the white house on this. he left under very suspicious circumstances. >> sean: i forgot to mention that in the timeline. >> it is an important point a crucial point, but i think an even bigger point now is that radcliffe wants to interview call me. interview comey.

interview carlin. interview sally yates. let's find out what is going on with them. i think we will start to see the story unraveled. >> sean: all right, amazing work all of you. we really appreciated. release the memo and find the texts. he was on fire last night he reacted to my opening monologue. we will check in with the chief counsel for the american center of law and justice, president trump's attorney, jay sekulow straight ahead.

>> sean: he is a chief counsel for the center of american law and justice. jay sekulow, a secret society? a secret society! >> look, sean. you can start with the secret society. you could end with the missing text messages, or you can start

with senator grassley. the chairman of the judiciary committee said conclusions first, fact gathering second. that's no way to run an investigation. >> sean: i think we have a theme. i want to show it to everybody. he's asked this question. let's go back to this here. i will get your response to it. >> director, did you make the decision not to recommend criminal charges relating to classified information before or after hillary clinton was interviewed by the fbi on july the second? >> after. if colleagues of ours believe that i am lying about when they made this decision, please urge them to contact me privately so we can have a conversation about this. all i can do is tell you that the decision was made after that because i didn't know what was going to happen in the interview. she may be lied during the interview in a way we could prepare >> sean: why did he do an exoneration? >> maybe she would have lied during the interview. did they try to set up a perjury

trap? you got to listen to what james comey just said. first he said he made the conclusion after the interview. we know that's a false statement because he made the decision months before the interview. by the way, it wasn't just the interview of the former secretary of state. other witnesses were granted immunity that have not yet been interviewed when he made his exculpatory statement saying that she's not responsible and no violation of law come up before the key witnesses were put forward or interview. then he said, she may have lied during the interview, and that maybe would've changed it. this is washington speak for what? an examination or investigation that from its offset, let's look at what it transpired he appeared let's put it into a context. number one, just weeks ago, we had a revelation about the number department of justice bruce ohr, whose wife is working for fusion gps with christopher steele on the dossier.

while her husband was serving as the number four in the united states department of justice. that's one. number two, the missing -- this seems to be, i hate to say this, but i've had this experience because of the litigation that we have engaged involving the irs targeting cases. you had the missing lowest learner emails. to get to the point of the case where this is the critical time, the prime time, and what happens? gone. the evidence can be recovered. we won the case, got the damages two years later. this is a pattern and practice. there is no explanation appeared what is the explanation for this? the fbi gave out faulty devices and didn't know there was a problem for five months? i hope that's not the case because that in and of itself is bad as well. >> sean: we know page and strzok know that he thought there was no there-there. that's fascinating, considering his position with russia.

they knew the fix was in. they talked about an instrument policy with mccabe. comey is writing the exoneration before investigation. now we see pages say it's a profile in courage. she knows there's not going to be anything here. they all knew that there was no shock and held that there was ever going to be any real investigation into hillary. >> i said it last night. these aren't investigations. they are political setups. the reality is, there's nothing in the investigation that's investigatory. in other words, when you look at what happens, the way it transpires, the missing documents, the witnesses, the statement from peter strzok, that's the classic one. you said there is no big there-there, so why will they waste my time going onto special councils? which he does a couple days later. you have all of this back-and-forth, but realize what was going on. he would have known there was no

there there because he was on the so-called collusion investigation. in the onset. >> sean: i want to ask you this and i don't know if you can answer this, that robert mueller wants to ask about the firing of comey and about general flynn. i'm not a lawyer, i will give you my take. it never in a million years under these conditions with his team of only democratic donors, and the track record of people like andrew wiseman, what ever let a president talk to this man, ever. >> let me just say this. as the president's lawyers, we evaluate the situation, we evaluate the facts, we evaluate the circumstances. sean, let me respond here. i understand what you're saying. as the lawyers, we evaluate the entire matter. i will not disclose what conversations we have or have not had with the special counsel. i will tell you this, this has been the most transparent investigation and history. we have turned over, what i say

weak president, transition team, the campaign, the white house, over 1,000 documents. we have had all the witness voluntarily complied. there has been no assertion before the special counsel's office of any type of privilege, anything at this point. nothing. i always asked the question, asked the president about what? that's what you want to know. i'm not going to disclose the conversations that we are having or not having. we are representing the client's interest. that's what i'll say pit >> sean: fair answer. i understand your position. jay sekulow, thank you so much for being with us. when we come back, former mexican president vincente fox, if hannity shoot-out is next.

the closer you get to home, the more you know the commute is worth it. for all the work you pour into this place, you sure get a lot more out of it. you and that john deere tractor... so versatile, you can keep dreaming up projects

all the way home. it's a longer drive. but just like a john deere, it's worth it. nothing runs like a deere. now you can own a 1e sub-compact tractor for just 99 dollars a month. learn more at your john deere dealer.

>> sean: big news out of our nation's capital tonight involving president trump's a border wall and negotiations

with democrats. chuck schumer went back on his word. joining us alive, fox news national correspondent and had every. >> good to see you. the democratic leader in the senate is under heavy pressure from his a liberal critic appeared in their worst, he caved to president trump in those negotiations over the government shutdown. what's "happening now" is the want him to stand strong and till he got doc of legislation. modern democrats see they felt uncomfortable about a showdown on standing up for illegal immigration. schumer got it from it for mitch mcconnell who agreed to take of daca legislation by february 8th when government funding runs out again. there's no guarantee that anything that passes in the senate will be agreed to by conservatives in the house. while the president and schumer discussed funding for the wall on the southern border when they met in the oval office last friday over cheeseburgers before the shutdown, the sender is now trying to backtrack.

>> we are going to have to start on a new basis. the wall offer is off the table. >> schumer take something off the table, i'm sure we will take something off the table. >> and obama veteran who is also boasting about leading the resistance, is claiming "democrats won multiple battles over the shutdown. that chip upon it, reopen the government, commitment from g.o.p. on daca vote. if they are lying in the government shuts down again before it expires, g.o.p. lost big time. it's time trump resides." you can see the approach to some democrats. if we won come about if we end up not winning, the president should resign. that is not something that will carry around here. >> sean: ed henry, thank you. joining is now the brand-new broke the book, former president vincente fox feared how are you? we've had some fights before.

when you were president, in the year 2002, you deported, you kicked out of your country 140,000 people that entered mexico illegally -- from nicaragua, guatemala, el salvador. you threw them out, and you say we do that where our racist and this is unfair and unkind and unjust. you did this very thing you don't want us to do. >> this is an issue that i agree with you 100%. the u.s. so we should kick out illegals? >> wait a minute. borders must be secure, and borders must be safe, and we must keep order like we try to do with president bush and senator mccain and senator kennedy. we put together a bill that was presented in congress. the bills will go over this issue. >> sean: why did you call the wall stupid?

why did you give -- tell trump to go to hell? you set all these things. why if the wall is good, why do you say build the wall like trump said with a door? we could let our friends in, but not the drug dealers. >> we are not war. it is good if you want to build a wall. but mexico is not playing for that wall. that's a stupid idea. making mexico pay for the wall. >> sean: he's negotiating. i think he's part two marcus smart. >> i know better ways of negotiating. it's a win-win situation we both can win. all of that is dealt in the book. let's move ahead. this book is not a good book confront. it's reasoning ideas, proposals. that's where you will read there. >> sean: forget about who pays

for it for a minute. a wall that america builds on the southern border. forget about the payment. if we build a wall, but i think mexico -- i think we should be best friends. i think america and canada should be best friends. mexico, canada, and the united states to all be best friends. but we need to protect our homeland, and i think you disrespect that. >> not at all. i want security. i worked at six years with president bush for that purpose. we had a good partnership for prosperity and security. we came out with a thing that can cure had to security. i do not have a problem with that. they called mexicans criminals. >> sean: he never said all mexicans. he said some. be fair. he said some. some are murderers. and that's true. >> he said mexico is the worst. 35 million hispanics work here

and made his country competitive. >> sean: you want them to become citizens. here's the thing. you agree and the rule of law. your there president. if you don't respect american law and you come here illegally, then you do not respect our -- wait a minute. all these people want to come in. what we give it to the people that do it the right way and respect our laws. >> this is not the united states i know. this is not the united states of its founding fathers. >> sean: absolutely is. all four of my grandparents came from ireland, and they came through ellis island, they didn't have any money, they were broke, and they came here legally. all we are saying, we will be good neighbors. you have to respect our border. respect our law. >> that's what we have to come up with wise, bright ideas, and not this anymore. that doesn't help the image of the united states. >> sean: why do you call the president stupid? he can go to hell?

you put your middle finger up. you say he's an idiot. why do you say all of that? >> because that's what i proceeded from him. i invited him to come. >> sean: he came to mexico. >> that was a mistake because -- >> sean: why was it a mistake? >> he shouldn't have been, but that's another issue. >> sean: if the american people decided. >> they didn't decide. >> sean: 40 some odd percent. that's how our system works but how many people voted for you? >> for me? 46%. >> sean: you didn't have a majority either. >> i didn't go against opposition. i try to unite. >> sean: let's end this on a good note. you were a lot calmer this time than the last time we had a big fight. i would say, we need borders to protect our country. >> agreed appeared to be what i

would say, at the president is right. >> you don't need walls, you need borders. >> is a waste of money. >> sean: let us decide what we are going to do. we will build the wall with a big door, and we can all be friends. but america has the right not to let people enter here illegally. >> who will pay for that wall and door? >> sean: hopefully mexico and not the united states. >> u.s. taxpayers and nobody else. >> sean: the wall is filled with a big door. you to happy with a wall? speak it with a big door? >> with a door that people come legally. >> i don't mind the wall being built, i'm just trying to advise american citizens, don't make your money. we should all be friends. that's what we are working for. >> sean: good to see you. god bless you. when we come back, jesse watters, jessica tarlov.

more straight ahead. let's see why people everywhere are upgrading their water filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids. pour it through brita's two-stage filter. dissolved solids remain? what if we filter it over and over? (sighing) oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so, maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.

get more out of your water. dynamic performance, so you can aggressive styling, so you can break away from everyone else. the bold lexus is. experience amazing. they always refer to me as master sergeant. they really appreciate the military family, and it really shows. we've got auto insurance, homeowners insurance. had an accident with a vehicle, i actually called usaa before we called the police. usaa was there hands-on very quick very prompt. i feel like we're being handled as people that actually have a genuine need. we're the webber family and we are usaa members for life. usaa,

get your insurance quote today.

>> sean: joining us now, cohost of "the five," it's his world, we live in it, you got to do it? >> there you go. >> sean: and fox news contributor, jessica tarlov. we had this five-month critical gap. the emails evaporate. hillary clinton's emails deleted. what's her name? of debbie wasserman schultz has an i.t. aide broken hard drive busted up in his garage. do you see a pattern here with your side? doesn't it sound like a cover up to you? doesn't your intellect tell you it's a cover up? >> i break so many computers

because i'm a liberal. not with hammers. i have not used bleach. i think you've asked me that before. it still the same answer. i've never used bleach. it doesn't seem like a cover up to me. it doesn't. >> all the emails from five months suddenly disappear. wouldn't that be -- >> you can't score a like that. with the number of technological problems that can occur, why was the fbi -- don't you think the people who took this oath to uphold justice in this country wouldn't back off of something they said and wouldn't get rid of those text messages? >> sean: this is the same fbi. we got to go through this. lisa page, peter strzok, andrew mccabe, james comey. did you ever -- do you think law enforcement rights exoneration before investigation? does that sound normal to you? speak and we have talked about this. >> sean: does that sound normal to you. >> not before i researched it. no. >> there were numbers in.

they were doing a frame job on trump >> a-frame job? what does that look like? >> they were sloppy and came in and admitted there was no collusion. he joined the mueller investigation to finish unfinished business that would lead to impeachment. that alone cost the insurance policy to present the risk of the trump >> what is that insurance policy policy? >> sean: i have a point of agreement. i think you will agree on one point. hillary bought and paid for it russian lies about trump. wait a minute. forget that part. used as a basis to get a warrant on an opposition party in election year. and then use to investigate and surveilled a president-elect. is there any several libertarian in you that says this is really bad? >> that isn't the complete story of what went on here. as of the evidence that they corroborated a good deal within the dossier. >> sean: fact, nobody

cooperated. glenn simpson never even tried to cooperated. >> i were there fbi officials put aside the idea that they were out for trump because they were not going to have the entire fbi out for him. >> they recovered it from the dossier. you said there was corroboration. >> i read reports that said -- who? the fbi. >> sean: no peered around. >> let me finish a sentence. i just had fbi. i can't be wrong. >> sean: you said you cooperated to. >> i don't think that happened. what i read -- >> they went to the czech republic and his password that he never went to the czech republic. >> i will leave you two guys alone. >>trevor: you give it? pgh >> no, i don't give up. but you have to let me finish a sentence before getting all flipped out here. what i'm saying is that the reason -- were done. >> sean: hannity hotline ringing off the hook. our video of the day.

. have you ever had car trouble in a place like this? (roaring of truck) yes and it was like the worst experience of my life. seven lanes of traffic and i was in the second lane. when i get into my car, i want to know that it's going to get me from point a to point b. well, then i have some good news. chevy is the only brand to receive j.d. power dependability awards for cars, trucks and suvs two years in a row. woman: wait! (laughing) i definitely feel like i'm in a dependable vehicle right now. woman 2: i want a chevy now. woman 3: i know! i cannot imagine managing my diabetes without my dexcom. this is the dexcom g5 mobile continuous glucose monitoring system. a small, wearable sensor measures your glucose every 5 minutes and sends the data to a dexcom receiver. dexcom helps lower a1c

and improves quality of life. if you're over 65 and you have diabetes, you should have a dexcom. if you get a dexcom, you're going to be very glad that you did. visit dexcomnow.com to learn more.

>> sean: all right, you are parents with a child who rides a school bus. they got so much trouble on school buses. this video is going to terrify you. watch this. this icy morning was in sutton massachusetts p.a. look at the school bus full of kids sliding out of control downhill. now, it knocked over a mailbox and then in a good way, thankfully, it hit this car and nobody was injured. it stopped right there. wow. scary. think out there okay. time for the hotline. here we go. >> hey, you are doing a great job. go get them! get them with all you've got. i think trump is awesome. by the way, if nobody wants those hats, i will take one. thank you. bye. >> you do nothing to the

political discussion. except for your hateful and agree just rhetoric. you are a horrible person, and i wish you -- >> sean: never the destroy trump media. laura, perfect timing on the top. take it away. >> laura: thanks everybody. welcome to "the ingraham angle" from washington. we have an action-packed show tonight. oh, my gosh. hollywood is a lavishing film that glorifies under age sex with academy award nominations for giving everything that happens, are you kidding me? and don dalton on donald trump's trip. why trump once again outfoxed his critics. and coulter on a new california law. i kid you not, that could let illegal immigrants