they received botox and can make the head bigger and lips droopier appealing to camel aficionados. we'll stop there. "hannity" is live from new york. >> sean: great show as always. huge balance at this hour, we on the program can now report the department of justice has now started and is recovering some of the five months of missing text messages from trump-hating fbi agents peter strzok and lisa page and president trump is saying he'll speak to mueller under oath. is it the right legal decision in we'll explore and the corrupt liberal media are in a full-pledged panic and trying to change the narrative to hide the truth amid a new stunning wave of information about anti-trump bias, abuse of power at the highest levels -- not the rank

of file of the fbi and doj. plus, you're not going to believe who james comey hired to be his lawyer and they're urging devin nunes not to release the classified memo exposing fisa abuses against the trump campaign. that's unacceptable to us and why we are still demanding congress release the memo and tell us the truth and that and more in a very important opening monologue. our exclusive reporting on the doj. we can report the missing fbi text messages -- we'll tell you about out in a second. first, president trump is letting the special crown -- counsel, robert mueller, know there's no collusion and there's nothing to hide. >> i'm looking forward to it.

there's been no collusion whatsoever. there's no obstruction whatsoever and i'm looking forward to it. i'd love to doit. -- do it. >> sean: with his lawyer's approval, that makes sense but is that the smart play? sound like game on to me. the drudge report has the headline up and sums it up perfectly, trump stares down mueller. i'll do it under oath. and we'll be joined later with legal reaction. also tonight, the walls are closing in on those responsible for this massive corruption abuse of power at the top levels of government in what we're now calling state-sponsored sabotage. with the flood of damning news exposing malfeasance they want to create as many distractions as possible and discredit anybody telling the truth like us on the fox news channel for

daring to report on the truth. for those wanting to advance false narratives, we never have been and never will will talk about rank and file members of the fbi, doj and the intelligence community. they're honor us with their service every day and there's no show on television that has and will continue to support these hard-working people that do such a service to their country. but the criminal wrongdoing we're exposing has only to do with a few select, obama administration, top bureaucrats who thought they knew better than you did about who should be your president. the liberal media is engaged in a total smear campaign and they want to shut up people like me and gregg jarrett and tom fenton and so many others. they want to conceal the truth. now, we've always had the utmost respect for the fbi, i have family in the fbi and intelligence community and police officers and firefighters

and military. now, can the liberal media say the same for themselves? we know the answer. how many times have you heard them attack people in uniform? those that serve us as much as they do. now that we're getting closer and closer every night in uncovering this huge historic massive scandal, the media is rushing to slander and discredit those of us exposing this. at the end of the day, every one of the so-called journalists at the so-called news networks are going to look like the fools we already know they are. the same people who have been clinging to a sink lifeboat of the phony trump-russia collusion story. it's been a year and they still cannot admit they've been wrong. there's no evidence and in many instances they're flat-out lying. since none of this has worked they're doing the bidding of robert mueller and the reporting on what the special counsel is

doing. let your own eyes see. >> a dizzying 24 hours in the russia investigation. no longer just inching towards the president. this morning, it's more like careening. >> happening now, breaking news, the russia probe closes in on the president and his inner circle. after 24 hours of bombshell reports and another just in. cnn has now learned the special counsel, robert mueller, wants to question the former white house strategist steve bannon. >> it's filling in bit by bit as the political team notes if the optics around the meeting with loretta lynch was bad, this is quote a hundred times worse. was a day of revelation in the russia probe. >> if there's any day to watch it's today, russia, russia, russia. >> sean: anytime there's massive

news about the massive abuse of power all of a sudden three or four stories of the special investigation and it spread like wild fire in their own echo chamber. so predictable. it's painfully obvious and by the way, a lot of their information i believe when it's all said and done, probably coming from robert mueller and the democrat hacks pushing them themselves. now, also tonight, big developments about the explosive classified memo exposing fisa abuses against the trump campaign. fox news is reporting they're now asking devin nunes to not publicly release the momento we deserve. now, do the doj not understand congress has oversight over them? they're investigating them. they don't have to hand the memo

over to everybody in spite what the liberal media says. we're once again calling on you, the american people to call up your members of congress, demand the memo be released. call the number 202-224-3121. also breaking this hour, this is huge, new information with the missing strzok/page messages. five months, a critical period. multiple sources are telling me the department of justice is, as we speak, in the process of successfully recovering many of the text messages in the five-month period of time from the trump-hating fbi officials pet peter strzok and lisa page and

their cell phones texts. this is critical. here's the question, was andrew mccabe's cell phone impacted by the so-called glitch? he was lisa page's boss. both she and strzok talked about, quote, the insurance policy in the office we believe was mccabe. and new revelation the new lawyer representing disgraced former fbi director and soon to be investigated james comey. according to buzz feed one of his attorneys is his columbia law professor buddy, the guy he leaked a memo to "the new york times" because he wanted a special counsel appointed his other bff, robert mueller. you can't make this up. and we have move proof and he testified he gave information

and by the way, they also collaborate before he testified. the classified information was created on government computers. so comey broke the law by removing them the fbi but it's clear mueller didn't care about any of that. they're best friends. mueller's main focus has been and continues to be carrying out a witch hunt to unseat president trump. it's an abomination to the nation and rule of law. as you have seen watching the show the past couple of nights, there's been so much breaking news about the fbi text messages that we've been able to cover all of this. i want to go back and i want to make sure you're up to speed, highlight a couple very important pieces of information. senator ron johnson revealing with bret baier last night an informant told him there was some sort of anti-trump, quote,

secret society within the fbi and here's the special report. take a look. >> what this is all about is further evidence of corruption more than bias but corruption at the highest levels of the fbi. the secret society, we have an informant talking about a group holding secret meetings off-site. there's so much smoke and suspicious. >> stop there. a secret society. secret meetings in the justice department and have you an informant saying that? >> yes. >> is there any more to that? >> we have to dig into that. this is not a distraction. this is bias potentially corruption at the highest level of the fbi. >> sean: really, secret society? you can't make this up. abc news is obtaining it and questioning if it's a joke. lisa page writing peter strzok, are you even going to give out your calendars it seems dough

-- depressing. senator johnson is making news by releasing text messages from anti-trump fbi lovers peter strzok and lisa page highlighting their further bias. on may 19 -- remember it was gone december 14 through the 16th of may and then mueller was appointed and all of a sudden they started reappearing again. strzok appears to be talking about getting an offer to join mueller's investigation. this is key, and right here, strzok, my answer is no. and the lead division and then i think -- wait, a case will be in the history books? a chapter? much like you tell me about my extra time in the field and all the cases. would you trade it? a million people sit odd staff jobs -- i didn't quite get that, this is a chance to do maybe the most important case of our

lives. by the way, the same guy saying earlier there's no there-there. 30 minutes later strzok add ed an impeachment and he talked about the possibility of trump/russia collusion after he was pointed. he said you and i both know the odds are nothing. if i thought it was likely, i'd be there meaning with mueller. no question. i hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there's no big there there. why would you want to do that? so strzok knew from the beginning he was leading a witch hunt and he would know because he's the top intelligence official and he signed the papers to start the entire russia investigation. strzok also dropped this bombshell from the clinton investigation writing for me and

this case i have a sense of unfinished business. i unleashed it with my -- well, the midyear exam, the code name for the clinton investigation. now i need to fix it and finish it. fix it and finish it? strzok is texting this may 19. remember, when we know hillary clinton wasn't even interviewed until the 4th of july weekend about her e-mail server on the 4th of july. it's at this point strzok and comey and others were drafting the exoneration before they spoke to clinton and other witnesses and strzok and page texted four days before comey's announcement and before interviewing hilary and clinton and loretta lynch all new clinton wouldn't be prosecuted. it's smoke gun evidence. what more do you need?

strzok, comey, loretta lynch they all knew the fix was in. it was rigged. let me connect the dots, have you have deep-state actors and top people, strzok, page, comey and loretta lynch and andrew mccabe shielding hillary clinton from prosecution though it is obvious incontrovertible she broke the law but they wanted her to stay in the race and defeat in the election donald trump. language was change from the legal standard negligence to extreme carelessness and shelling out for a salacious dossier for russian propaganda and lies to rig it against trump. she's the same woman who rigged the primaries against bernie

sanders according to brazil and deep-state officials used this fabricated dossier to obtain a fisa warrant. the phony russian dossier to spy on an opposition candidate, donald trump, in an election year. then as a president-elect. talk about watergate. this is watergate on steroids on human growth hormone. the theal the constitutional violations are severe. you have deep-state actors abusing the tools of intelligence we give them to protect the country and covering up hillary clinton's crime because they wanted her to stay in the race not be indicted because they out to they knew better than you who should be president. more importantly, they thought they would never get caught. they never thought clinton was going to lose. now tonight, it is time for the

attorney general, by the way, good job at the doj finding some of the five months of missing texts and i think they need to point a second special counsel. to investigate and prosecute every single person we are talking about involved in this. here with reaction, former chairman of the house oversight committee, fox news contributor jas jason chafetz and sarah, you broke some news tonight. you heard at the beginning, the doj, as we speak, are recovering the missing five months. that is huge tonight. >> it's huge news. it fits with what other fbi agents were telling me where they said, look, they can get the text messages. there's no way -- there was a technical glitch that got rid of

the messages. fbi are experts at going after criminals hiding text messages and are able no get it from them and if they have the phones they can get it and if they're in the server, they can get it. the question is why did they respond that way with this technical glitch? i have new news, sean, i have been told by members in congress that they will release that memo out and go to the public. >> sean: this is big news but we take it a step further. see more steps from lisa page and peter strzok. what are your thoughts? >> if you extrapolate that is 65

texts a day. did they have opportunity to do their jobs at the fbi? it appears abundantly clear they harbored an anti-trump animus and unabashed adoration for hillary clinton. it influenced their decisions -- and they were involved in clearing hillary clinton and launching an investigation against a political candidate, donald trump, and spying on him, it's an abuse of power, felony crime and you have the doj trying to cover up the four-page intel memo. as nixon one says it's not the crime it's the cover-up. >> sean: let's go to the new development, sara, you caught this in your article tonight on saracarter.com and jason, the idea is if the investigation

leads to impeachment there's no there, there. f the president and if i can get rid of him and this would make history. what do you think, sweetheart? that's what he's saying to his lover. >> that's a good synopsis but the only thing i'd add is the nexus to barack obama himself communicating under an alias using an account to hillary clinton who may have been overseas perhaps in russia on a non-secure line what was the motive to make sure she wasn't prosecuted -- >> sean: do you ever have an

exoneration before investigation? >> no, there's like 16 people who had not yet been interviewed -- >> sean: 17 and hilary. >> if a judge started writing his opinion before he heard testimony -- come on. john ratcliff under oath asking director comey when you make the decision. that's where comey's strongest legal troubles are. >> you reported on there. there's no there-there on the russia thing but if this can be historic, if this impeachment -- these -- f-him. that's what they wrote each other. have you strzok and comey writing the exoneration and the insurance policy with page, strzok and mccabe. why are these people still working and not have been fired and why did mueller pick all these people and a haven't mentioned andrew weisman yet.

>> that's one of the biggest questions from former fbi folks saying, look, have we done a little bit speck of what these folks did, we'd be fired and removed. what's going on here on the seventh floor. why would the fbi put a guy having an affair. peter strzok was working counterintelligence and having an affair and texting on an unsecured line, his government issued phone, open for anyone to capture and then they move him to human resources? they move him from out of the special counsel and we can't get an answer to why he hasn't been fired? why lisa page is still working? there's a lot of questions here. we have to look at deputy director andrew mccabe. look at everything that's come from andrew weisman on special counsel. sean, this is the reason why the

doj doesn't want the fisa memo out. i agree chaffetz. >> sean: steve bannon talking is old news too. didn't the leaks -- don't you suspect as i do it came right from robert mueller's office because they're under fire and because of all that we're discovering here they know their time is up? >> it's not unusual for a special counsel to interview the subject of the investigation, donald trump. trump can't hide executive privilege. you have communications to congress. this say criminal investigation. the president could be held in front of a grand jury. so trump has to respond and testify. the only question is can he limit the scope of it which is attorneys should try to do

because i was a defense attorney. i have yet to see they care about wins and losses and it could be a trap and he's a smart guy. when he needs to be, i've read his depositions he can be focussed and cogent -- >> sean: would you ever let the president -- i appreciate he wants to be up front and honest, i would never ever ever in a million years allow him to go before this witch hunt special counsel -- >> but he has no choice. can't invoke executive privilege. it's a legitimate investigation -- >> sean: don't you think there's enough bias and abuse in the special counsel he has legitimate legal arguments? >> by meeting with mueller you

are legitimizing his investigation which is illegitimate. there has to be a stated crime. look at the order signed by rosenstein to mueller. there's no stated crime. it's an illegal investigation but the president may have no choice. >> sean: let's get your take on this, jason chaffetz, i would never in a million years. i'd fight that up to the supreme court on the grounds, number one, mueller's team is corrupt, it was founded -- remember, hilary rigged the primary. hilary paid for the phony das -- dossier and helped by peter strzok and comey and then the phony dossier was a predicate to get the fisa warrant against the president. i believe anybody liberal,

conservative, republican, democrat, civil libertarian have you to be concern about the misuse of the intelligence and weaponizing against the american people. >> i think i would do what you suggested and not do it but i tell you what, donald trump is unlike anybody i've seen before and think he wants to do that and you look at what donald trump jr. did he released e-mails and gave testimony. they do things different. one thing i have to add, with strzok and page, why do these people have security clearances? if you don't have a security clearance, guess what you don't work at the department of justice in their capacity. how can they possibly have a security clearance? take away that security clearance and get rid of them. they should be fired and working and being paid by the american taxpayers. >> sean: sara carter we'll give you the last word this segment.

>> i spoke with a defense attorney familiar with weisman and mueller and said the president would have to be crazy to fall in their trap. this is what that do and have done in the past and will try to find anything and why they want to question him. sean, i don't know the legalese gregg is the expert but that's what i was told. >> sean: gregg jarrett. >> bill clinton tried his best not to talk to ken star and negotiated some limits on his taped interview but in the end he had to do it. there's no legal basis in try to go to the supreme court. the supreme court will knock you down politically. it will be ugly for the president. he has to do the interview. >> sean: but there's a precedent for restrictions. there's a press -- precedent for the topics. >> the bill clinton case. >> sean: it can't be open-ended.

it's impossible. >> limit the scope of the scope. by the way, from the president's point of view it's simple. i didn't work with russians or include in terms of obstruction of justice i'm allowed to fire people in the executive branch. >> sean: gregg, sara, congressman. the president is making major headlines tonight declaring there's no evidence of collusion and he'd do that sit down under oath, with the special counsel. again, let me play this for you and we'll get reaction. >> i'm looking forward to it actually. there's been no collusion whatsoever. there's no obstruction whatsoever. and i'm looking forward to it. i'd love to do it. again, i have to say, it's subject to my lawyers and all of that. >> sean: and he's ready to meet with them but he'll be guided by

the advice of his personal counsel. should the president sit down with robert mueller. he fills in on the show and a very nice person and great lawyer. how are you? >> i'm fine, thanks. the answer so your question is simple. the president absolutely should not sit down or agree to do it. look, you and i both know the president. he said there is no collusion, there's no collusion -- >> i admire him wanting to do it. >> i don't believe his lawyers have agreed and he said it's subject to the lawyer. number one, why should he answer questions about the firing of comey if he has a constitutional right to fire him. two -- >> sean: shouldn't that be his answer if in fact he goes. >> it's never going end. i know federal prosecutors. >> sean: i have to stop you, this is important. i have talked to friends that are attorneys. i brought this scenario and i

said what if i'm being interviewed he said you say no and then you have to be willing to sit there. in my life i'm used to no dead air -- ever. i'd be able to do that but we know president trump and he's going to say no and tell you why and why and why. >> and talk about this and that. it's a trap. that's what the feds do. we already know they're biassed. the second reason is he only needs to answer questions about crimes. if it's not a crime to fire jim comey then what crime are we talking about? collusion? russian collusion is not a crime, ergo, he doesn't need to a pair and they'll bring in witnesses and squeeze him to try to implicate him and make him seem like a liar. it's ridiculous to go in front of this prosecutor. >> sean: it's like general flynn they knew his answers because he

walked into a perjury trap and that's scary in term of unreasonable search and seizure and no warrants and it never should have happened. the problem here is they don't like this president. look at this team that robert mueller put together. is that fair? strzok, weisman, they're backgrounds? weisman withheld exculpatory evidence. >> he has a terrible reputation the department of justice knows it but it's the same department of justice that's allowed everything you said the last several months. here's the bottom line, it's our justice department and fbi. >> sean: how do you stop it? executive privilege? you go to the supreme court, what do you do? >> there's executive privilege. this is more political reason than a legal reason and that's why the president's saying sure i'll do it. >> sean: i don't trust mueller based on who he's appointed and

all that's gone on. i think he's out for blood. >> not only out for blood but out to save his own butt -- >> sean: because of all the revelations >> sean: >> because he's the person that should be investigated, strzok, mccabe, why are they get paycheck why are my dollars paying for them. they need to be taken out in cuffs. this is not our justice department. this is a bunch of arrogant condescending people who think they know more than we do. you've been on it the whole time, sean. >> sean: judge, glad to see. >> good to see you. >> sean: when we come back, the great one -- wait until you hear what the great one mark lavin said and the missing texts we now know tonight are being recovered as we speak. breaking news on "hannity." we'll weigh in next. i have type 2 diabetes.

i'm trying to manage my a1c, then i learn type 2 diabetes puts me at greater risk for heart attack or stroke. can one medicine help treat both blood sugar and cardiovascular risk? i asked my doctor. she told me about non-insulin victoza®. victoza® is not only proven to lower a1c and blood sugar, but for people with type 2 diabetes treating their cardiovascular disease, victoza® is also approved to lower the risk of major cv events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. while not for weight loss,

victoza® may help you lose some weight. (announcer) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck or symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing, or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. change the course of your treatment. ask your doctor about victoza®.

>> sean: the great one mark lavin on fire warning with the deep state and the battle against donald trump. take a look. >> the fbi sought to interfere in the election i'm talking about the top echelon. they sought to interfere with our election and in our election in worse ways than the russians does. how did barack obama is never questioned about this. his name never comes up. never comes up. are you telling me the director of the national security council susan rice didn't know a thing and ben rhodes, a well known leaker, he didn't know a thing and valerie jarret controlling every cabinet and secretary and james comey who likes to meet with presidents and takes memos didn't meet with the president and write memos? it's nice to see we have

committees in congress concerned and we have radio hosts concerned about this. it's a nice to see we have television hosts concerned about this. where the hell were they in march? mark what are you talking about? where were they in march when i had information, pulled it together the public accounts and began to pull the strings and to see something didn't smell right. something didn't look right. and the media came down on me like a ton of bricks. >> sean: and mark was on the show at that time and sara carter in march. they broke the story about fisa abuse and a warrant at trump tower. here with reaction, harvard constitutional law professorialan der show wits. good to see you again. you fear they're going to try

and go after obstruction of justice. it was supposed to be about collusion. explain your fear. >> well, my worry is a constitutional crisis could be started if mueller starts probing the president's motives as to why he exercised his constitutional authority to why he fired comey and telling comeyy, comey to go easy on pipeline and prosecutors can't probe the motives and get in the brain of the president any more than when president bush pardoned casper wineberger. nobody thought thought to probe his mind or the workings of his mind. i think one possibility is for the president to say, look, ike -- i'll answer questions about

alleged criminal conduct but not moti motives on my constitutional authority and if you press me on that we'll get that resolved in the supreme court before anybody can be charged with anything relating to obstruction of justice or exercising constitutional right. >> sean: why in this environment, professor, would the president ever go before mueller knowing about comey and strzok and page and what would you do if you were his attorney? >> first, he has no choice. special council can subpoena him. he can refuse to answer special questions based on privilege or areas based on his constitutional authority but in general, every american citizen has to comply with the subpoena in front of the grand jury. he'll probably have to compromise and work out a deal with time limits and his lawyer

present and limits on the scope of the questioning. now, they won't agree on obstruction of justice. mueller will insist on answering questions and his lawyer will say that's out of bounds. it will create a separation of powers for anyone to question the president's acts under article 2 of the constitution as long as they were lawful actions nobody has the ability to question the president's motives. >> sean: look, you're a well-known criminal defense attorney, harvard law professor, have you ever heard of a, an fbi director and investigator riding exoneration draft after draft, months before they interview the key people involved? b, when a phony dossier paid for by one candidate to lie to the

american people and then based on a fisa warrant isn't there a strong argument this never should have happened? >> yes and every civil libertarian should be concern. i've been writing since hoover was the director and civil libertarians should be concerned with the potential abuses of intelligence. which is why i called for an independent bipartisan commission. not a political inquiry, to inquire into whether there was influence in the election by rush -- russia, or fbi or anyone else because you won't get it when there's partisan disputes by special council whose only proper job is to investigate special crimes. >> sean: to use one candidate, a phony dossier they paid for to be the premise of a fisa warrant

against an opposition candidate and then an incoming president and then the fbi director is literally exonerating. i believe there were crimes committed. mishandling of classified information, destruction of classified information. i don't know many people that acid wash their hard drives and beat the [bleep] out of their mobile devices but they exonerated her before they investigated. >> as you know -- >> sean: my question here is, there has to be a basis here this was formulated on false information from the get go. >> look, there are two issues. i agree with you completely that if the fisa warrant was based on a questionable and possibly false series of documents, that under the supreme court doctrine can be challenge. the issue about whether or not you exonerate before an investigation depends if there's a crime charge.

if there's no crime of course you exonerate but if you're look for evidence you need a full investigation. >> sean: thank you, professor. when we come back, ed henry live report on the fight against sanctuary cities and more straight ahead.

i'm a small business, but i have big dreams, and big plans. so how can i make the efforts of 8 employees, feel like 50?

how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes. just like that. like everything. the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done, dream more, dream faster, and above all, now, i'll dream gig. now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network.

>> sean: big news on president trump's fight on illegal immigration. live fox news national correspondent our own ed henry. ed, you're there alone, the president's on an airplane >> he's heading to davos. before he left he stepped up his crackdown on illegal immigration. congress may be stalled but has his attorney general, jeff sessions, sending an aggressive

letters to municipalities and districts asking why they're not followingf followingful following federal guidelines saying they'll start being charged. emmanuel saying we'll never abandon our values as a welcoming city. de blasio was among several mayors who formally boycotted a white house event leaving the president insisting the focus should be on keeping the public safe. >> sanctuary cities are the best friends of cartels like ms13 and it's unacceptable. look at what happened in san francisco and kate steinly. my administration is dedicated

protecting innocent americans and the mayors who choose to boycott the event have put the needs of criminals over law-abiding americans. >> that came after the president lashed out at chuck schumer on backpedalling on funding the wall. crying chuck understands after his humiliating defeat if there's no wall or daca or protection for dreamers. we must have safety and security with great military for our people. schumer said the clock is ticking for draeamers. white house aides say schumer is talking tough because of what happened on the shutdown and administration officials tell me they believe the bipartisan daca deal others have been pushing is dead on arrival and the president's going to jump in the fray laying out his own framework and tougher provisions

on tracking down on illegals. that's going to come out next monday, sean. >> sean: ed henry holding down the fort, now joining us geraldo rivera. i know you had a medical procedure. look great. >> you make it sound like i had plastic surgery. >> sean: he sends me a picture. my staples are out. thanks, geraldo. >> that's how close we are, my brother. >> sean: i know you're passionate on immigration but you would accept the deal, build the wall, fully fund it and chain migration, merit-based immigration if you have daca. why did chuck schumer act like a big baby after the schumer shutdown? >> in broad strokes you're right

on the compromise on immigration reform. we can't snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. president trump has an historic opportunity. he got chuck schumer and left-wing people like gutierez to say we'll fund the border wall if you give us humanity for the million dreamers. >> sean: democrats don't want the wall, they want to run on daca. isn't that the truth, larry alder. >> the democrats have lost the white vote since 1964 unless they can use the jeddi mind trick they need to bring in

voters to bring in their philosophy that means voters from third-world countries. the illegal aliens would likely vote for the democratic party 2-1. >> where do we get the nonsense about race? larry, how did this suddenly become about race? >> it's about votes, geraldo. >> this say wonderful opportunity for this president i've known for 40 years to do something he wants to do and has compassion for the kids and will get the wall. he'll get the wall. stop talking about people of this color and that color. >> geraldo, ask yourself whether or not luis gutierrez would have the same position on border wall and security if 80% of illegals turned citizens would likely vote republican? i dare we'd have a different --

>> larry, you believe in ronald reagan. he understood latinos particularly are instinctively entrepreneur capitalists. treat them with kindness. we just supported jorge garcia who came here at age 10 -- are we going to have 700,000 incidents of jorge garcias being deport and children crying. come on, let's make a deal. >> geraldo i'm happy you mentioned ronald reagan because in 1986 he got rolled. he was promised border security and employers who knowingly hired illegal aliens would be heavily sanctioned neither was done.

[multiple talking] >> sean: i want to thank you both. >> george w. bush got 44% of the latino vote. >> sean: a powerful video of the day straight ahead.

♪ >> sean: video of the day, larry nassar, the monster who pled guilty to sexually abusing those girls on the gymnastics team. he was sentenced today. i have to give a lot of credit, the judge's powerful statement during sentencing as the video of the day. thank god for judges like this. >> sir, i'm giving you 175 years, which is 2100 months. i've just signed your death warrant. i find that you don't get it, that you are a danger. you remain a danger.

i am a judge who believes in life and rehabilitation when rehabilitation as possible. i have many defendants come back here and show me great things they've done in their lives after probation, after parole. i don't find that's possible with you. >> sean: said. time for the messages users left me on the hand of the howling. take a listen, what do i get hit with the night? >> you suck, you should shut up. >> i just want to say that for the last two nights i noticed that you did something with your tie and it looks much, much neater than what you had done in the past. i guess you took the advice of one of the callers last week, that commented about your tie a knot. so i appreciate you taking the time to do the not properly. >> sean: i listen to. not going to lie.

just don't care -- i've got jeans and boots on. see? that's it. that's what i wear. that's who i am. reach us at that number on your screen. we will always be fair and balanced. laura is an expert did you call in and say i suck and to shut up? and >> laura: are these people who dial into this hate line, hotline -- >> sean: i got a great idea! call in tonight and comment on laura and we will play it tomorrow night. >> laura: i can't stand that woman, she's awful! >> sean: welcome to my world! >> laura: to people who call into your hate wearing, are they from an insane asylum? they sound like they are either shot up or boost out. i don't know if i want to hang out with him. they sound fun. >> sean: i got a couple of nice compliments. i got you suck, shut up. i'm not killing kittens every