tv Hannity FOX News January 26, 2018 10:00pm-11:00pm PST
10:00 pm
camels. >> tucker: i'm sure you can. thank you for joining us, great to see you. >> my pleasure. >> tucker: our week is over. see you monday. ack at 8:00 m. . . sean hannity is next. >> sean: welcome to "hannity. >> welcome to "hannity".ity. president trump is firing back to the "new york times" calling their reporting that he ordered the firing of special counsel of robert mueller as fake news. this is the biggest nonstory hyped by the liberal media which we know hates president trump. the reason they're spreading this news in their echo chamber is they desperately want to create a distraction. as i told you last night, they don't want you the american people to know about the biggest story in their life times that involved real evidence of wrongdoing and crimes that they have missed. there's a huge week of revelation about corruption at
10:01 pm
the highest level of the fbi and doj. we have more text messages we will share with you from the trump bashing fbi lovers. this will prove we're on the right course. fox news is learning that the classified memo, released the memo detailing major abuses against the trump campaign that will be released mid week next week. also tonight a stunning report that hillary clinton actually protected a senior advisor on her 2008 presidential campaign that was accused of sexually harassing a young staffer. a lot to get to. we start with tonight's breaking news. opening monologue. glad you're with us. all of those with trump hating media, we know you're watching. let's start with a news flash. president trump did not fire the
10:02 pm
special counsel robert mueller. all of those idealogues need to take a drink or whatever. you could take it and breathe and stop. this rampant speculation. i want you to listen closely. president trump, he did not fire the special counsel mueller. the president and his legal team have been more than cooperative. they have voluntarily handed over 20,000 pages for the special counsel. in total mueller has selected 1.4 million pages of documents from the campaign. according to the "new york times" and other liberal media outlets. president trump demanded mueller be fired but fox news tonight is reporting the president did not order mueller to be removed.
10:03 pm
instead it was just regarding mueller's conflicts of interests. this is why i did not and won't in the future, trust the "new york times" because they get it wrong time after time. it is why trump is ripping the paper. >> what about robert mueller? >> fake news. fake news. "new york times". fake story. >> we've been telling you a long time it doesn't matter to the liberal mainstream media. it is why the "new york times" posted this story before this show, the media went into a frenzy, they completely lost it. it is sad because journalism is dead. watch this. >> the president of the united states ride to fire the independent counsel, robert
10:04 pm
muller tmull -- mueller? is that impeachable. >> you wonder if he's corrupt? we lean toward corrupt. >> his first year in office, he's done everything to undermine and obstruct and halt this legitimate investigation. >> it adds to the mounting evidence there's a -- there's a serious obstruction case here. >> i don't know how this movie ends but there was a lot of bloodshed in the godfather. this is going to be a rough year. >> it is so predictable from the news media. they never waste an opportunity to smear the president and pedal fake news. they don't care about the truth. that's sad. their goal is to damage and destroy trump. you could see it hour in and hour out and minute by minute. that's why the media is caught in the wrong. countless times. so-called major news stories.
10:05 pm
let's give you examples. it was reported that trump junior received wikileaks. it turned out fake news, cnn, they got the date of the e-mail wrong and it came one day after the wick leaks made them public. ross had to issue a correction saying it happened during the transition, which means he was talking to a future counter part. huge difference. ross is suspended and is banned from covering trump. i could think of other people that should be baned with as well. we have a totally dishonest washington post reporter. this is wiigal.
10:06 pm
he posted a picture of trump showing a tiny crowd and the caption reads packed to the rafters. here's the problem, that picture is deceptive. it took place before most people got there. later he apologized and deleted the tweet. that's your media at its finest. by the way, those are only a few of the many examples of epic fake news screwups and anonymous sourcing of course. it is why the "new york times" report about mueller and the media is over the top. sky is falling. and breathless coverage. it is not surprising for over a year, they have been pushing conspiracy theories. they have been chasing ghosts about trump and russia and collusion. we still have no evidence. meanwhile the media has been oblivious to the biggest
10:07 pm
stories. it is shaping up to be the biggest scandal in american history and they missed the boat. this is going to make watergate look like an afterthought. we have been uncovering and reporting night after night on massive severe constitutional abuses that were committed by top ranking obama doj and fbi officials against the campaign. and the clinton e-mail investigation was a total sham. the fix was in. tonight we have new text messages from fbi lovers. this is a new exchange, it appears the couple was leaking information about clintklinclin administration to the media. they found e-mails on the computer. and lisa paige's computer.
10:08 pm
you may want to turn on devlin there's news going on. paige replies, he just got handed a note and struck said huh he's asking now. and paige says it is funny coming now. minutes after those texts, devlin writes on twitter sources are telling him that e-mails on wiener's computer may not be new and instead were copies of e-mails that the fbi already looked at. we reached to the reporter and he said no comment. shocking. what we have is leaks, so many 50,000 in total. this is only the tip of the iceberg. let's go back to february 25th, 2016. look at this. paige messaging her boyfriend.
10:09 pm
one more thing, she may be our next president, the last thing you immediate is us going in there loaded for bear, do you think she'll remember or care that it was more doj than fbi. agreed. they're worried about actually investigating clinton because she may end up being mad at them and may want revenge if she wins because they think she's going to win and they're trying to help her. months later, it was comey and strut and other officials, they started writing clinton's exoneration statement, this is months before interviewing her and other key witnesses. when do you write an exoneration before an investigation. this is where they change the language. remember from the legal standard. gross negligent is a crime. they put in carelessness, means the same thing but legal a big distinction.
10:10 pm
they give clinton a get out of jail free card. they altered language about those likely hacking clinton's sev sevrv server. the fix on the e-mail server scandal was in. remember, any of these issues that we're talking about, they're all crimes, mishandling classified information, destroying program information. they're all crimes. the leading 33,000 subpoenaed e-mails, crime. answered. hard drives, crime. obstruction. paige putting the fix in along with kolby and lynch. they all knew. they talk about a special
10:11 pm
counsel to investigate clinton's e-mails. strut writes the perfect person. paige says who? strut writes pat, who is patrick fitzgerald in the valeri claim affair. he put innocent scooter libby in jail. gave him a guilty plea in that case. we delayed briefing him until i could do it, in other words with his own prejudice and point of view and spin. late next week or later he says. and strut says i could work with him again. and we would get blank done. paige follows up with, i know, like i said, we discuss him yesterday. on may 13th, 2016, paige follows up. hey, forgot to ask if you mentioned special counsel to andy. what strut and paige are doing
10:12 pm
here is stunning. here's why. strut had a massive role in the entire clinton e-mail probe. he oversaw the interview with hillary clinton and her top aides long after they wrote the exoneration. and paige as you might remember was mccabe's legal counselor. they're both saying the special counsel is needed which means they had doubts the fbi would do a real investigation which they didn't do. senator johnson made news this week releasing text messages on may 19. strut appears to be talking about getting an offer. he says strut says, no my answer is no, i don't want to join that investigation. then the lead division and then i think, wait a minute, this may be a case that will be in the history books. a chapter. much like you tell me about my extra time in the field and all of the field cases. would you trade it? a million people sit and add and
10:13 pm
staff jobs, this is a chance to do. it may be the most important case of our lives. and around 30 minutes later, strut asks paige the question, investigation leading to impeachment? he's the one that says there's no there there. in this case, it seems like strut knew mueller was going to impeach the president and he wanted to be a part of history. he didn't think there was any there there. may 19th, two days after mueller was named special counsel, strut said you and both know the odds are nothing. if i thought it was likely, i would be there. no question. i hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there's no big there there. so strut who served, the top intelligence official at the fbi. he signed the papers to start his phony russia investigation. he's saying he knew from the start that mueller would carry out a witch-hunt. he didn't know if he wanted to be a part of it. and revelations about lynch and her involvement in the clinton
10:14 pm
e-mail sever cover up. then now supposedly talking about grandchildren for 40 minutes and lynch said on july 1st she was literally stepping away from the investigation and she would accept whatever the fbi concluded. keep in mind, all of this is before hillary clinton's view. that happened on 4th of july. three days later. after lynch's statement, she's going to step back here. let the fbi decide. she'll go along with what they decide and she goes with bill on the tarmac. and strut says timing looks like hell. paige replies, yeah, awful timing. paige later adds, it is a real profile in courage meaning lynch. since she knows no charges will be brought, here's a problem, no decision was made. four days later, well three days
10:15 pm
later, hillary's interview. four days later, comey spends 13 1/2 minutes laying the case that clinton should be indicted and lets her off the hook. they all know clinton won't get charged. and the obama administration puts the fix in. the corruption here if you're a "new york times" writer is unprecedented. you should maybe be covering a real story because when you put it all together, here's what it all means. you have hillary clinton, we now know fixed the primary against bernie sanders or i'll use brazil's word, rigged it. then struck comey, lynch, mccabe, others, and they all put the fix in. that allows clinton to stay in the presidential race. they don't want to rock the boat
10:16 pm
so they overlook the crimes with the evidence. and clinton and the dnc. then they try to influence the election with a bought and paid for, 12 million dollar russia dossier full of russian lies and propaganda. the obama administration, they took the dossier, they weaponized the powerful tools of surveillance and then used the phony dossier to get a warrant to target members of the trump campaign. later the incoming president. if this is not watergate on steroids and every person involved not investigated and not prosecuted to the full extent of the law, we have shredded our constitution. you have powerful obama administration officials in the fbi and doj trying to stop the american people.
10:17 pm
we can never let this happen again. the only way to do that is make sure we get every fact and every bit of truth and expose it to the american people. those people that committed crimes need to go to jail. the key players need to be exposed. this is what republicans are trying to do. they fight to release the memo. some of them. you've been helping in the audience. what do we know about the memo? we're told there's abuses against the trump campaign and the president-elect and his team. and fox sports is learning that memo will be released likely in a matter of days. it is imperative, keep the pressure on. keep calling your members of congress. demand, release the memo. remember the bottom of the screen will get through. you've got to put the pressure on them. tell congress release the memo. we deserve to know the truth.
10:18 pm
and release all 50,000 texts. joining us now with reaction, former deputy assistant to the president, fox news, national security strategist and news analyst. greg, let's start with you. look, it is a lot to take in. we take every bit of new text messages and put it with old ones and we put it with what by gleaned of the years. now facts, we have a clear picture of what went on. >> the evidence is mounting now that strut and paige and others at the fbi were engaged in a corrupt purpose. that's important because that's in the obstruction of justice statute. so these messages reveal several things. one they knew the evidence against hillary clinton was enough to charge her. second of all. they changed the language from
10:19 pm
charging her to exonerating her. and third they did it for political reasons because they wanted her to be president. they thought she would be president. they didn't want to anger her. >> if all of them who knew ahead of time, that's not a real investigation. you don't write exoneration before the investigation. did they obstruct justice? >> absolutely. if they did it for a political reason. and the evidence demonstrates they did. >> thank goodness for electronic technology because this is -- this is the smoking gun evidence of their motivation. motivation is how you prove obstruction of justice. you were in the white house a lot of time. i'm sure this took attention away from the country, maybe that was the goal. but when you see the level, the use of pfizer courts, the
10:20 pm
weaponry of intelligence. with you see the people at the highest levels doing this, to me it is chilling as somebody that believes in the rule of law and equal justice and the constitution. >> it is chilling, sean, as those that escaped dictatorship where the police were used for these purposes. i never thought that the fbi would be openly talking about giving special treatment to an individual they wanted to become president. we were in the white house. i was secure there was no issue. the president told me they will find nothing because there was no collusion. we've been accuse of obstruction of justice. not one piece of evidence. what do we know today? we know that inside obama's fbi
10:21 pm
there was a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. one woman who had committed felonies, there's for the a question as greg said, you mishandled and that person was treated with kid gloves. >> sean: let's talk about the media. the media will go with anonymous source about allegations that never came to fruition. they ask if there's conflicts. he says no. they make that big news. go ahead. >> let's put this into context. we're talking -- your team, you and your team have been doing the heavy lifting every night in the monologues. one day that -- that data will be used in a court of law to prosecute these people. i'm sure. what is the media doing in the meantime, when they're not
10:22 pm
colluding with these people inside the obama administration as the messages demonstrate, what are they doing? just a week ago they're asking the rear admiral who is the president's surgeon whether he's still drinking diet coke everyday. this is the biggest scandal in modern american history and the media ignores it or is complicit. that's the outrage. >> sean: if president rump is saying, does mueller have a conflict and doesn't fire him, how is that a story? >> it is a legitimate concern. again, under -- legitimate concern of the president. and for the nation for goodness sakes. i wrote about it ad nauseam. the journalists have been howling, this is obstruction of justice. they don't know about the law and not read the statute. as i mentioned before in a different context, it requires a corrupt act by the president. he was engaging in a legitimate
10:23 pm
act according to the "new york times", if you believe them, trying to remove mueller because of his myriad of conflicts of interest and replacing him with somebody who would be legitimate objective, fair and neutral. >> sean: reasonable thing anyone would do. >> these idiot journalists. >> sean: they're not journalists. >> they don't know a [bleep] thing. all they have to do is look it up. it takes a nano second. >> sean: they are sheep. >> they would comprehend if they read it. >> sean: newt gingrich sounds off on the "new york times" exclusive report where nothing happened. straight ahead.
10:24 pm
the closer you get to home, the more you know the commute is worth it. for all the work you pour into this place, you sure get a lot more out of it. you and that john deere tractor... so versatile, you can keep dreaming up projects all the way home. it's a longer drive. but just like a john deere, it's worth it. nothing runs like a deere. now you can own a 1e sub-compact tractor for just 99 dollars a month. learn more at your john deere dealer. you won't see these folks they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office?
10:25 pm
10:28 pm
♪ >> historians will look back on this period as schizophrenic insanity. on the one hand you have genuine fbi information coming out about clearly covering up for hillary clinton in ways that are astonishing which probably won't make page 1 of the "new york times" and then a nonstory about a nonevent. even if the president said i love to fire mueller, there's no event there. the idea that he's not liking mueller and that's obstruction of justice, it tells you how desperate the left is getting. >> there's the evidence surrounding trump. sarah, you know, a nonstory
10:29 pm
about a nonevent. i think that pretty much sums up the media hysteria yesterday. but what they missed yesterday was what you were reporting and we were reporting and that is just how abusively biassed strut and paige were and how many people were in the loop knowing that the fix was in as it relates to doing a real investigation in to hillary clinton before they interviewed her, exoneration before -- before any investigation. so you know, that's got to be frustrating as you've been unpeeling every layer of this onion. >> it is frustrating. we see leaks come out. as information comes out about the fbi and the text messages between strut and paige and more evidence starts to unravel, you get a leak like this that goes to the "new york times". it is really a nonstory. the president has every right to question whether or not, you
10:30 pm
know, special counsel mueller is right for the job. he has every right to discuss this privately with his attorneys. as we see, nothing happened. he didn't fire special counsel mueller, he talked with someone about the circumstances apparently around special counsel mueller. there was no order to actually fire him. i think what is frustrating is that the american people are not getting well informed by all of these very important news agencies. the "new york times", the washington post, cnn, msnbc, they're not focused on these stories. right now what we know is that the fbi and let's go back to the story we just talked about the other day, the fact that the fbi and doj, we lost all of these text messages and you won't get them and then all of a sudden they have them. we have to ask why did they say
10:31 pm
that to begin with? what are they hiding? >> what about hours before the house intelligence committee was going to get the subpoenaed documents was he begging paul ryan, please don't release this. one of the roles judicial watch has played, i know you have freedom of information act requests, it looks like we'll get the memo next week, probably mid week after the state of the union, but why do we have to wait to get to 50,000 text messages. why not release them? they would have a right maybe to look for information that could put somebody in harm's way. fair enough. >> it doesn't take that long. >> that's right. we've been asking for -- we have numerous requests to which these text messages are responsive and lawsuits. and we've been getting the run around. we've been asking about them since we found out about them. we asked the justice department and fbi what is going on.
10:32 pm
they told us, if you want them, sue us. so we did. we asked for the text message and we sued and a few hours later we found them. this is about -- this is about -- about this news story that is planted this week, about the president's concerns about mueller, the text messages, the gamesmanship there, the justice department fighting the house on releasing a summary memo of this underlying material. it is all about protecting the mueller operation. what i think the headline is in the "new york times" and washington post is mueller has conflicts unaddressed. he investigated the firing of comey, the very job opening for which he interviewed. why is he -- why is he anywhere near the investigation given that conflict? why is the president the one raising it? where is the justice department making sure that it is conflict
10:33 pm
free. >> they're all in this memo we'll see next week. that's the one leak we got. next week is a big newswe week. the memo is a small portion. i think you'll break next week, one about weisman if i'm allowed to tip your hand for you. you did. being the nice guy i am. what is coming next week and how big does this memo end up being? >> well first, it is true. we need to focus on members of the special counsel. weisman and shaun has come up over and over again. we have something regarding weisman. another important story that is out next week is of course the fisa memo. we expect that to be out mid week and it is explosive. i know that not just talking to
10:34 pm
congressional members but other law enforcement officials who have gone to congress about whistle blowers about fisa abuse cases. this is a way to keep our country in check. it is one part of so many more pieces of this puzzle. remember a lot of this information is classified. it is classified information. we can't get our hands on it. they'll go ahead and -- and put out the pieces, redacted i think after the fisa memo. >> real quick. >> andrew weisman, the number two in mueller's operation sent an e-mail on trump's order and refused to following it, went to clinton election night party. why is he near this? >> he investigated paul manfort. so many conflicts. next week is a massive news
10:35 pm
week. more breaking news this friday. the president pushed his agenda in front of the world and the world leaders today. we have highlights. what a difference a year makes. straight ahead. dynamic performance, so you can own the road. aggressive styling, so you can break away from everyone else. the bold lexus is. experience amazing. you won't see these folks they have businesses to run. they have passions to pursue. how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. get a 4 week trial, plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale. go to stamps.com/tv
10:36 pm
10:39 pm
>> since my election, we created 2.4 million jobs. small business optimism is at an all-time high. new unemployment claims are near the lowest we've seen in almost half a century. i'm here to deliver a simple message. there has never been a better time to hire, to build, to invest and grow in the united states. we just enacted the most significant tax cuts and reform in american history.
10:40 pm
as president of the united states, i will always put america first, just like the leaders of our countries should put their country first also. but america first does not mean america alone when the united states grows so does the world. >> that was the president earlier today in front of world leaders in switzerland, touting economic accomplishments and touting america first agenda. he tweeted back, headed back from exciting two days in switzerland. my speech on economic revival was well received. many people i met will invest in the u.s. ceos praised his tax cuts and they have made huge investments in the u.s. and that means more good jobs for the
10:41 pm
forgotten men and women in the country. and a heated battle over immigration reform. the president released him framework today. 125 million dollars for the border wall system in exchange for a pathway to citizenship or daca individuals. listen to what pelosi had to say. >> let me say what i said last night. that plan is a campaign to make america white again. they want the ransom for these children to be 25 billion dollars for a wall when we have all of the needs we have for infrastructure in our own country. >> schumer also rejecting the fox business network, lou
10:42 pm
dobbs is back. >> i keep -- i want the wall. >> okay. >> democrats don't want the wall and don't want daca, because that's what they want to run on in 2018. lindsey graham and jeff snowflake are helping the democrats. >> you know. >> right or wrong? >> right but there's one problem. schumer is going to be there. democrats will be there. they'll lock their teeth like in 1986 with amnesty. it is not border wall anymore. did you hear the flash. border wall system and we build ramparts around the force of entry too. it is not a wall, it is a trust fund. don't you feel better about that? >> no. >> i trust schumer and the
10:43 pm
demes. >> there's no deal for the president at all unless he gets the money. he gets the money. >> no. this is what he told me. he said the border agents prefer a see-through wall. >> with a light veneer on the side? it should be a big beautiful wall with big doors, just like inside. >> was fine. the border agents say they want that. >> that's great. they're not testing that with commando, so i don't know where we're going with that. the man and woman you talked about and the president campaigned for are pocketen when this comes to amnesty. here's we are. 100 house republicans campaigned for years. seven democrats vote for clean repeal and when it matters in 2017, they wouldn't do it.
10:44 pm
we have graham, jeff snowflake and other republicans with no intention. they want amnesty. here's your tradeoff. do you pick the wall if you could eliminate chain migration or the lottery? >> you mean under the four pillars from the trump administration? >> or nothing? >> right now you got nothing. >> i'm asking, if you had a choice. you're being difficult to me, i'm your friend. >> you are my friend. you're being difficult suggesting this a proposal -- >> if the president could get the wall and chain migration, would you accept what the democrats are demanding? >> i don't know what they're demanding. three always -- they always -- >> well, 800,000 was it? >> 3.6. >> right now donald trump has
10:45 pm
tripled obama's 800,000 so i'm not mad at the president in any way. he's doing great things. >> what should he do? >> he should do what he's done on the economy. he should do on the military and law enforcement. he should make sure that every [bleep] he's promised comes to pass and he will go into history forever. >> tell me if you agree with this, if the republicans don't build 2 or 300 miles of wall by november it will hurt them significantly in november. true or false? >> well, it is false because -- they couldn't even screen out erosion. >> they're going to break another promise as usual. >> are you kidding? >> i'm asking. what do you think? >> i -- i don't know what to think because you know the answer to this. the democrats are the problem. the left is the problem. >> so are the republicans? >> huge problem. >> you mention graham and
10:46 pm
10:47 pm
10:48 pm
10:50 pm
>> sean: so hillary clinton claimed for decades she was a champion of women, >> hillary clinton claims to be a champion of women but now during her campaign, she allegedly intervened to keep a senior advisor on her campaign from being fired after accusations arose that he repeatedly sexually harassed a subordinate, he was instructed to receive counseling. we reached to hillary clinton.
10:51 pm
they said, quote, to insure a safe working environment, the campaign had a process to address complaints of misconduct and harassment. when matters arose they were reviewed with these policies and appropriate action was taken. this complaint was no exception. here's reaction with florida attorney general and gina. lowden. this is hillary. >> this is hillary. this is not a partisan issue at all. if this is a republican woman, i would say the same thing. she covered this up. her manager said she should fire strider but she kept him on after doing this to a young staffer on the campaign.
10:52 pm
how does that staffer feel that another woman did that to her? after me too movement women are coming out. that's why the story is coming out. it is -- shame on her. >> dr. loudoun. >> this is a pattern that hillary demonstrated in her career, since her husband was president. she not only covers up any wrongdoing, she also then piles on and makes it worse for that victim. so much for her caring about young women and helping them in their careers. she's been completely discredited as has the democratic party as much as they want to own the me too movement. >> look at what we've been uncovering and uncovered, how does she fix a primary campaign against barney. how does she have stromey and strut and the others, how do we
10:53 pm
know she's not being investigating for what are felonies and the e-mail scandal, how does she fix an election with phoney russia propaganda that never happened and she get that phony document to be used as basis for an fisa warrant, and media ignores it. >> the media could ignore it but the justice department won't. i'm sure jeff sessions will open an investigation. they have to. what -- the dossier. everything she did. it is horrible. she could condone what her husband did as long as she wants to, but we just sent a bipartisan letter to congress. shame on her. she must be investigated. and this -- now -- now we're finally seeing her real colors. how every station in the country is not going to cover this
10:54 pm
story, they better. >> you guys have a great weekend. we have the greatest, it is the greatest video of the day on the "hannity" highlight. that's next. hot line" is next. my name is jeff sheldon, and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch
10:58 pm
>> sean: all right. so many parents know >> so many of you parents, you know what it is like to have a child that doesn't want to go to bed and miss a thing. a british man's daughter kept leaving her room at night, he tucks her in, he thought he put up a safety gate that would do the job. he guessed wrong. here's the video of the day.
10:59 pm
>> that's amazing. what a great kid. thank god she's safe. time for the "hannity" hotline and what we had last night. >> my cat doesn't even like u you. >> you remind me of an old eddie munster. have a great day and go after the liberal snowflakes. they deserve it. >> "hannity" you're supposed to be bright, you can't pronounce the name remember. it is not member. >> sound off. remember, we will always be fair and balanced. we're not the destroy trump media. we won't give up on the stories. we have a big news next week releasing the memo.
11:00 pm
state of the union, that will happen. we set your dvr so you don't miss an episode. have a great weekend. >> laura: good evening from washington. welcome to "the ingraham angle." with assault from the left and right an epic battle has just begun. congressman steve king said negotiations should start with one simple question, who and how many would each side deport. and the super secret fisa memo could be made public when the state of the union speech on tuesday. we have new details on what's happening on monday and more evidence that bill wasn't the only clinton mistreating women. a shocking new report about a hilary cover-up on
128 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Fox News West Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News ArchiveUploaded by TV Archive on