tomorrow is international holocaust remembrance day. let's watch most seeing you bac p.m. monday. sean hannity is next. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." firing now, president trump is firing back at "the new york times" calling the ordering of robert mueller as fake news. this is the biggest non-story ever being hyped by the liberal media that we all know hates president trump. the reason the brain-dead partisan press is breathlessly spreading the fake news in their echo chamber is because they want to create a distraction. they do not want you, the american people, to know with the biggest story in their life times that involve real evidence of wrongdoings and crimes they have missed. it's been a huge week of revelations about corruptions at the highest levels of the fbi

and doj and tonight we have even more. new text messages. we'll share with you from the trump-bashing fbi lovers, peter strzok and lisa page and it will prove we've been on the right page. and fox news found the memo detailing major fisa abuses against the trump campaign, that will be released likely next week and tonight a stunning report hillary clinton protected a senior adviser on her 2008 campaign accused of sexually harassing a young staffer. a lot to get to. we start with friday's breaking news and opening monologue. glad you're with us. members of the trump-hating media, we know you're watching. news flash, president trump did not -- let me repeat, did not fire the special counsel robert

mueller. you ideologues need to take a deep breath or xanax or drink and breathe in through the nose and out through the mouth and see if you can stop with the hysteria and listen closely, president trump did not fire the special counsel robert mueller. in fact, the president and his legal team have been more than cooperative. they've voluntarily handed over 20,000 pages and robert mueller has collected 1.4 million pages of documents from the campaign. then there's this, accord to "the new york times" and other media outlets, president trump demanded robert mueller be fired. fox news is reporting the president did not order him to be removed. instead there was a conversation in june given mueller's massive

conflicts of interests. that's is why last night i did not -- and will never in the future, trust "the new york times." they've gotten it wrong time after time after time and why president trump is ripping the paper of record. let's take a look. >> fakes news, folks. fake news. >> what's your message? >> typical "the new york times" story. >> sean: it didn't matter to the liberal mainstream media and last anytime when "the new york times" posted this story ten minutes before this story, the media goes in a frenzy and foamed at the mouth. it's funny on one hand and sad because journalism's dead. watch this. >> the president of the united states tried to fire the independent counsel robert mueller iii. does that rise to the level of an impeachable finance?

>> it's a question whether he's ignorant or corrupt. you lean towards corrupt. >> donald trump has done everything possible to undermine, obstruct, demean and halt this legitimate investigation -- >> it adds to the mounting evidence there's a serious obstruction case here. >> i don't know how this movie ends but there is a lot of bloodshed in the got father -- godfather and it's going to be a rough year. >> sean: it's predictable from the news media. they never waste an opportunity to smear the president and don't care about the truth. their goal is to damage and destroy donald trump. you see it hour in, hour out, day by day and minute by minute. that's why the media has been caught in the wrong, countless times, major news stories. from last year, fake news, cnn, the old network, they falsely

reported donald trump jr. received an e-mail on wikileaks and fake news, cnn got the date of the e-mail wrong. it came one day after wikileaks made the dnc documents public. remember abc's brian ross wrong when he reported general michael flynn was going to testify president trump order him during the campaign to contact russian officials. that fake news tanked the stock market and ross had to issue a correction saying it happened during a transition. a huge difference. he's now banned from covering president trump. i can think of other people that should be banned as well. we have a dishonest washington post reporter david weigl

showing a tiny crowd and the caption reads "packed to the rafters." here's the problem, the problem is deceptive because it was taken before most people had gotten in there and he later apologied and deleted the tweet. that's your media at its finest at work and those are only a few of the many examples of epic fake news screw-ups and anonymous source, of course. anyti "the new york times" reported about mueller and there's hysteria, the sky is falling and breathless coverage. not surprising for over a year they've been pushing conspiracy theories. they've been chasing ghosts about trump/russia collusion and there's been no evidence and the media's been owe believius to the biggest oblivious story of their life

time and they've missed the boat. this is going to make watergate look like an afterthought and only a fraction of the information has come out. we've been reporting night after night after massive, severe constitutional abuses commit top-ranking obama/fbi officials against the trump campaign. new evidence is showing the clinton e-mail investigation was a sham. it was rigged. the fix was in. and tonight we have new text messages from corrupt trump-bashing fbi lovers peter strzok and lisa page and was leaking information to the media. look at the date, october 28, 2016, after news broke the news broke abadin's e-mails on wiener's computers.

and page finishes saying mike's phone is on fire. strzok responds it's on the news then adds, you may want to tell devlin to turn on cnn and strzok says sorry and page relies, he knows. he just got handed a note and strzok says, ah, he's asking about it now and page says, it was funny. minutes after the texts barrett writes e-mails were copies of writes e-mails were copies of clinton e-mails the fbi has my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out.

shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

>> historians are going to look back on this period as schizophrenic insanity. on one hand have you genuine fbi information coming out about clearly covering up for hillary clinton in ways that are auto astonishing this won't make page one of "the new york times." even if the president got angry and said i'd love to fire mueller, there's no event there. the idea the president is culpable of not liking mueller and that is somehow going to be an obstruction of justice tells you how desperate the left is getting. >> sean: former speaker of the house, newt gingrich, calling out the schizophrenic insanity. now fox news contributor, sara

carter. a non-story about a non-event. that sums up the hysteria yesterday. but what they missed yesterday is what you were and we were reporting and that is just how abusively bias strzok and page were and how many people were in the loop knowing the fix was in as it relates to doing a real investigation into hillary clinton before they interviewed her, exonerations before any investigation. so that's going to be frustrating as you've been unpeeling every layer of this onion. >> as investigation comes out about the fbi and text messaging and peter strzok and lisa page and as more evidence starts to unravel, you get a leak like this that goes to "the new york times." it's a non story. the president has every right to

question whether special counsel mueller is right for the job and has the right to discuss it privately with his attorneys. as we see, nothing happened. so he didn't fire special counsel mueller. he talked about the circumstances around special counsel mueller. there was no order to fire him. what is frustrating is the american people are not getting well informed by all these very important news agencies, "the new york times," "the washington post", cnn. we know the fbi -- and let's go back to the story we talked about the other day, sean, the fact the doj said we lost five months of text messages through a technical glitch and you won't be able to get them and now they have them. why did they say that to begin

with, what are they hiding? >> sean: why didn't rob rosenstein before the committee was going to get the subpoenaed documents was begging paul ryan, please, please, don't release this. one role the judicial watch has played key in getting information -- i know you file a lot of freedom of information act requests. it looks like we'll get the memos next week probably after the state of the union but why do we have to wait for the 50,000 text messages. okay, maybe they can look for information that puts someone in harm's way but that doesn't take that long. >> we have numerous requests to which the text messages are receivi receivive -- responsive and lawsuits and getting the run around and they told us if you

want them, sue us again. and we did sue them. we asked for the text message and sued and a few hours later they found them. it's about the news story that was planted this week about the president trump's concerns about mueller. the text messages, the gamesmanship there, the justice department fighting the house on releasing a summary memo of the underlying material. it's all about protecting the mueller operation. what i think the headline is in the "the new york times" and "the washington post" he's looking at the firing of comey. why is he near this investigation given that conflict? why is the president the one having to raise it? where's the justice department, rob rosenstein to make sure it's not conflict free. >> sean: rosenstein, comey are

in the memo. that's the one leak we got. next week's a big news week. even the memo is only a small portion of what's coming out in the case. i know you're in the middle of two big investigative reports you'll be breaking next week. one about andrew weisman if i'm allowed to tip your hand for you, being the nice guy i am, what's coming next week and how big do you think the memo ends up being. >> first, it's true. we need to focus on members of the special counsel and andrew weisman has come up over and over. he's very important because he's a central part of the investigation. i do have something coming out next week with regard to andrew weisman. another story that's going to be out next week is the fisa memo. we expect that to be out some time after the state of the union in midweek. it's explosive. i know this not just from

talking to congressional members and other law enforcement officials who have gone to congress as whistleblowers about fisa abuses. it should shock every american and it's a way to keep the country up check. it's one part of so many more pieces of the puzzle. a lot of the information is classified. it's classified information so we can't get our hand on it. they'll go ahead and put out the pieces, redact it, i think after the fisa memo. >> andrew weisman, the number two at mueller's operation send an e-mail supporting sally yates' order and went to hillary clinton's election-night party. >> sean: and he leaked information about paul manafort before he started investigating him to the a.p. so many conflicts all coming together. next week will be a massive news week on to the state of the union and the memo being released.

when we come back, more breaking news this friday. the president pushed his america-first agenda in front of the world and world leaders. we have highlights. what a difference a year makes. straight ahead. created 2.4 million jobs and

unemployment claims are the lowest in almost half a century. i'm here to deliver a simple message, there's never been a better time to hire, invest and grow in the united states. we've just enacted the most significant tax cut and reform in american history.

as president of the united states i will always put america first just like the leaders of other countries should put their country first also. but america first does not mean america alone. when the united states grows so does the world. >> sean: that was the president earlier in front of world leaders in switzerland and putt pushing his america-first agenda. after his big speech he tweeted quote, heading back from an exciting two days in davos, switzerland, my speech on the american revival was well received. many people i met will be investing in the usa. if he's right, european ceos praised his giant tax cuts and have made huge investments in the u.s., that means more good jobs for the forgotten men and women in the country and here at

home a heated battle over immigration reform is ramping up. the president released his frame wok for immigration reform including funds for the border well system in exchange for daca individuals are already attacking hit. listen to what nancy pelosi had to say. >> that plan is a campaign to make america white again. they want the ransom for these bi children to be billions. >> sean: chuckie schumer rejected it and prompting trump to tweet, daca is made increasingly difficult by the fact crying chuck schumer took such a beatdown on the shutdown he is unable to react.

lou dobbs joins us. i want the wall. >> okay. >> sean: democrats don't want the wall and don't want daca because that's what they want to run on in 2018 and lindsey graham and jeff "snow" flake are helping the democrats. am i right or wrong? >> schumer will be there and the democrats will be there and lie through their teeth like they did since ronald reagan in 1986 with the first amnesty. by the way, it's not a border wall anymore. it's a border wall system -- well, we're going to bill ramparts around the ports of entry. it's not a wall. it's a trust fund. don't you feel better about that? >> sean: i don't. listen, there's no deal for the president at all unless he gets

the money. >> he says the border agents prefer a see-through wall -- >> with a light veneer and chiffon on the side. it should be a big beautiful wall with big beautiful doors. >> sean: the border agents say they want that. >> that's great. but they're not testing that with the commandos. all i know is the forgotten men and women the president campaigned paid for are still forgotten when it comes to amnesty. >> sean: a hundred house republicans demanded repeal and replace. seven democrats, 2015 vote for clean repeal and in 2017 they wouldn't do it. we have lindsey graham, jeff

snowflake and others without intention. they want amnesty. here's your trade-off. do you pick the roll if you can eliminate chain immigration -- >> like under the four pillars from the prior administration -- right now have you nothing brother. >> sean: why are you being difficult to me, i'm your friend. >> you are my friend. i'm your friend. you're being difficult with me suggesting it's a proposal -- >> sean: no, if the president could get the wall and end the chain immigration and the visa lottery, would you accept what the democrats are demanding or is that a big deal. that's my question. >> i don't know what they're demanding. there was one for $800,000 -- >> sean: no, $3.6 million. >> right now donald trump has

tripled barack obama's $800,000 i'm not mad at the president in anyway. he's doing outstanding things and outstanding year. he should do what he's done on the economy and military and law enforcement. making sure every damn thing he's promised comes to pass and he'll go into history forever. >> sean: tell me if you agree, if the republicans don't build 200 or 300 miles of wall by november it will hurt them significantly in snow november, true or false? >> they couldn't even screen out erosion -- >> >> sean: so they'll break another promise? >> are you kidding? i don't know what to think, you know the answer. democrats are the problem. the left is the problem. >> sean: so are liberal republicans. huge problem. >> you mentioned graham and flake -- i can't remember. >> sean: yes, i did.

boy, you are on fire. have a great weekend. >> you too. >> sean: when we come back, hillary clinton caught in a major scandal. another one. details next.

>> sean: so hillary clinton claimed for decades she was a champion of women, according to a brand-new report during her 2008 presidential campaign intervened to keep a senior adviser from being fired after accations arose he repeat lid sexually harassed a subordinate and was order ford counselling

and lost weeks of pay. and we reached out and they said quote, to ensure a safe working environment the campaign had a process to address complaint of misconduct or harassment when matters arose they were reviewed in accordance with the policies and appropriate action was taken. here with reaction, pam mondi and radio talk show host geena lauden. i'm looking at that and thinking the same campaign paying people less and persecuted christians and jews, that hilary? >> that hilary. it's not a partisan issue. if this is a republican woman i'd be saying the same thing. she covered it up. her campaign manager said she should fire stryder yet kept him off after doing this to a young staffer. how does that young staffer the rest of her career another woman

did that to her. after the metoo movement. >> she not only covers up ann -- any wrongdoing and so much for helping young women. she's been discredited in this as has her democrat party. >> sean: look what we've been covering and uncovered. how does she fix a primary campaign against bernie? how does hillary clinton have comey and strzok and people who know mccabe and loretta lynch. how do they know she's not being investigated for felonies in the

e-mail server scandal. how does she get to fix a phony russian investigation propaganda and how does she get the phony dossier as a basis for a fisa warrant and the media ignores it. you're an attorney general, explain. >> the justice department better not. i'm sure jeff sessions and his staff will be opening an investigation against her. they have to. the fake dossier and everything she did. it's been horrible. she can condone what her husband did but a young staffer on her campaign -- we just sent a bipartisan letter to congress to address issues like this. shame on her. she has to be investigated. she must be investigated and this -- now we're finally seeing her real colors. every station in the country isn't going to cover this story, they better.

>> sean: all right. have a great weekend. we have the greatest -- this is the greatest video of the day and "the hannity hot line" is next.

>> sean: all right. so many parents know what it's like to have a child that doesn't ever want to go to bed and miss a thing. when a british man's daughter kept leaving night after night he tucked her in and thought he put in a second safety gate. he guessed wrong. here's the video of the day. [crying]

[laughter] >> that's amazing. what a great kid. time for "the hannity hot line." >> my cat doesn't like you. >> i want to say you remind me, don't take this wrong you remind me of an older eddie muenster more than fred flintstone. have a great day and go after those liberal snowflakes because they deserve it. >> hannity you're supposed to be so bright you can't pronounce the word remember, not member. you dumb [bleep]. >> sean: you have anything to stay, sound off. we'll always be fair and balance and we're not the destroy trump media and will not give up on the stories they're not reporting on and have a big news

week and set your dvr. laura's next. it's friday, weekend time. have a gre >> laura: good evening from washington. welcome to "the ingraham angle." with assault from the left and right an epic battle has just begun. congressman steve king said negotiations should start with one simple question, who and how many would each side deport. and the super secret fisa memo could be made public when the state of the union speech on tuesday. we have new details on what's happening on monday and more evidence that bill wasn't the only clinton mistreating women. a shocking new report about a hilary cover-up on her 200