the case. the back-and-forth in the recriminations on this continue. what effect it has on trading tomorrow, anyone's guess. this weekend, we're going to have house judiciary chairman committee on. >> kimberly: and can really go far with juan williams, jesse watters, dana perino, and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five" ." tonight, new developments in the showdown over a classified memo on a large surveillance abuses by the fbi and the russia investigation. president trump is expected to approve the release of the documents after agreeing to some read actions at the fbi's request. it could be declassified possibly by tomorrow morning. this afternoon, speaker paul ryan advocated for its release as long as sources and methods are revealed. >> let me tell what this is and

what it's not. it is congress doing its job and conducting legitimate oversight over a unique law, faisal. if mistakes were made and if individuals did something wrong, then it's our job as legislative branch to conduct oversight over the executive branch. with this is not is an indictment on our institutions, our justice system. it's not an indictment of the fbi, the department of justice. it does not impugn the mueller investigation with the deputy attorney general. the government has been given extra in her power over citizens' civil liberties. it's our job to make sure that the process is followed properl properly. >> kimberly: the memo was commissioned by devin nunes, republican chairman of the house intelligence panel. democratic leaders pelosi and sharon called for nunes' remova removal. speaker ryan says he will not be

doing so. speaker their playing politics looking for a distraction. devin nunes help shepherd through reauthorization of 702, foreign terrorist foreign surveillance law. focused on keeping the country safe and national security. i think they are trying to sidetrack us. >> kimberly: we are probably going to get some breaking news on this tomorrow that's going to be released in terms of reporting. what do you think we can expect and what to think about the messaging? >> dana: i'm not sure. i understand what speaker ryan is trying to do. a couple things come he's trying to explain that the memo has nothing to do with the bob mueller investigation. i really think that's a very tough communications bar to clear. even if, even if it's true that it has nothing to do with it, everybody assumes it has something to do with it. all these background sources say that the white house or some in the white house, sometimes they say the president, believes this is going to help him in the

court of public opinion thinking there is bias against him and therefore questions of credibility of the whole russia investigation. then you have the fisa issue, there's lots of different titles in the fisa bill. we talked about this the other day, where you have foreign terrorist calling into americans and you get a warrantless wiretaps, that's one part of the fisa program. when i understand is that the concerns about possible abuses or inappropriateness is in a different title, title i, which is about basically going after a warrant for an american. that's where the abuses apparently weren't really valuable to clarify it. before he came to air, reporting on background sources on axios that some people are fearful it's not all it's cracked up to be and maybe it's been overhyped. when speaker ryan says pelosi and schumer are calling for distraction by saying nunes

should step down, you do have to think that the republicans of actually been looking for a distraction for the past couple weeks as they have gone through proper channels or try to figure out how to release the memo. >> kimberly: jesse, what do you make of it? overhyping? >> jesse: a fear there could be some overhyping and i'm nervous about it because they've been hyping this bigger than i've ever seen. if they don't deliver, everyone is going to be very disappointed. with that said, the way pelosi is acting in the way eric holder is acting, and the way james comey's act active, he leads me to believe that the democrats at least think it's a very damning memo that's going to hurt the democrats it's going to raise a lot of questions about the russia investigation. >> dana: that's what paul ryan says it's not. that's why i think that republicans' communications messaging is hard. they are saying it has nothing to do with the russia

investigation and bob mueller but it is being conflated. reasonably so. >> jesse: i think the conflation comes in terms of one of the things i think the reporting says we do know is that this dossier that was paid for by hillary and was fake was used as the justification is by the trump campaign. that seems like the hardest bit of evidence we have. as far as anything else, it looks like comey has been implicated in some capacity. rosenstein has been implicated. every those names bandied about. now they want to redact those names. i don't see what redacting names will do. they are saying they have changed the memo. that's a lie. i think it was a grammatical change. the other change was something the democrats wanted. the smoke screen, the democrats like to say, it's a smoke screen for the russia investigation. the democrats are now deploying a smoke screen for the abuse of power because right now it does look like, people were debating this for many years, worried

about the fourth amendment. we are worried about federal government knowing too much and abusing their power from getting into personal stuff. looks like some of those fears were founded on, you know, actual reality. we will see what happens. i am seeking of hearing about it. just release the damn thing. >> kimberly: tomorrow it will be over for you. greg, what do you make of this? paul ryan making the statement. some people want this to come out today, and of time, versus friday. >> greg: yeah, i love our viewers. i love our viewers so much that i sometimes have to give them some tough talk. this is a memo intervention. the more this is played up on cable news, the less it may be. you've seen this happen with other scandals. i call it life down -itis.

it fizzles and we move on to something else. it is like the reboot of "full house." i was looking forward to it was a big letdown. with the russian inclusion thing, it's the same thing. you look at the memo. it is like competitive strip tease. one side is saying look at this, look at this. the other site's look at this, look at this. you look at that any look at that, he realized this is the worst strip club ever. msnbc, rachel is fantastic and every day she is telling the story. she is selling the story. and at other networks, it is the memo telling that story. it is scandal ping-pong. >> jesse: competitive strip tease coming to a theater near you. >> kimberly: scandal pong. >> greg: i could be wrong. i've been wrong before. i hate talking about stuff i don't know about but if i follow that, i would never open my mouth. so i am going to say a

prediction that we probably will be let down. if i'm wrong, then we'll talk about it tomorrow. we'll probably lead with it. >> kimberly: what a happy friday it will be. juan, do you think in terms of what the republicans, some of the messaging that they have gotten ahead of the game here or how do you see it? >> juan: i think the purpose is pretty apparent, which is that president trump doesn't like the investigation. he is trying to undermine the fbi, justice department, as part of an effort to get his supporters to disbelieve anything that comes from the special counsel or any of these investigatory agencies. what is striking to me about this is you had the director of the fbi, christopher wray, go over to the white house to meet with the white house chief of staff, john kelly, a company -- a company by rod rosenstein, deputy attorney general. both said it would be a reckless act, it would endanger national security that out there. this was a cherry picked

documents. there are omissions of fact the things that are distorted. and it will lead to methods and sources being volts. they asked. these are two trump appointees. not the democrats, which i guess we can, picking up what greg is saying, team sport politics. you have to look out for american institutions and trust in law enforcement. here, despite what paul ryan says, we have a president putting his interests, his disinclination to listen and abide by anything that's coming from the mueller investigation over the best interests of the american people. i am surprised the republicans, over the best interest of law enforcement in the united states. >> greg: for so long we've been told how heroic whistle-blowers are for exposing this information. where is the chelsea manning fan club right now? why aren't they saying "release the memo." i don't think there's any reason

for secrecy and the metal is i think what's in it, we already know. i think the idea that it's top-secret is unfair to the american people. >> juan: here's the thing. the same group it does let's be transparent since no, democrats, your ♪ ♪ can't go out. and then secondly when i asked about the classified information by the document, if you believe in transparency, they said no no, we can't put that out. but users have to listen to our interpretation. >> jesse: i don't think that president is trying to undermine anything. i think the congress is doing oversight and that's what their job is. you also said the fbi doesn't want to that. of course they don't because it's very embarrassing to the fbi. all of a sudden, juan williams trust law enforcement. i want to show that for the last year you said law enforcement needs to be -- have body cameras on them and we have to look out for bias in law enforcement. now we actually have evidence of bias in law enforcement and you don't want to know about it, juan. when has been made yet not wanted more information. i always thought usa journalists

want more. >> juan: i don't know. you are on such weak ground. i understand why you want to do some sort of personal attack on me. >> jesse: it's not personal. >> juan: you talk about police in the streets in black communities, i'm not talking about the fbi looking at our politicians. >> jesse: if there is a biased cop patrolling a black neighborhood that doesn't like black people, wouldn't you suspect that black cop? if there is a biased fbi agent that doesn't like donald trump and he is overseeing the investigation, wouldn't you -- >> juan: maybe you should go back and look at the newspapers that indicate -- yesterday the agent to use that doesn't like donald trump him it was disclosed as a guy who wrote the memo saying let's go after hillary clinton. let's reopen this ten days before the election. >> jesse: what else happens, mccabe, was just let go to collect his pension, knew about these extra emails that hillary

had and didn't tell james comey for weeks. for weeks. why not? what was he hiding? >> juan: he wasn't hiding anything. >> jesse: why did he wait weeks? >> juan: comey has said nothing is, that would justify having prosecuted hillary clinton. >> greg: the great thing about this is we are all arguing about something that nobody has read outside of a few people. >> kimberly: but we will know. >> greg: it is tomorrow, dana. >> dana: i can't wait. one other point, "wall street journal" just posted an article about carter page in the original fisa warrant which it said was not during the trump campaign. it goes back to 2013. there is additional information in this article that i think we will see it, i don't know how "the wall street journal" got it, but if this memo comes out tomorrow and the democrats want their memo released as well, you can bet that there are probably other information that somehow

leaks out tries to at least get to the bottom of it. maybe we will all know more tomorrow after that memo comes out. with "the wall street journal" article that just posted. >> juan: before we go, what happens for you, any of you, if, in fact, the president says rod rosenstein, you are implicated in the memo. i want you gone and i'm right about cementing their life and can reign in the mueller investigation, would you say this is horrible? i can't believe that the president would interfere with the law enforcement agencies in the country in this manner to protect himself. >> greg: you are proposing a question about something that hasn't happened. >> juan: you don't think this is set up firing rod rosenstein? >> kimberly: the president didn't offer the memo. president trump takes on democrats to bedford or nothing on daca as a new deadline rapidly approaches. it's all next. not having a good breakfast

can make you feel like your day never started. get going with carnation breakfast essentials® high protein drink. it has 21 vitamins and minerals with 15 grams of protein to help you be your best. try our high protein drink.

you know what's not awesome? gig-speed internet. when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids, and these guys, him, ah. oh hello. that lady, these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them. uh huh, sure. still yes! xfinity delivers gig speed to more homes than anyone. now you can get it, too. welcome to the party. ♪ >> jesse: another deadline approaching to strike a deal integration. president trump may putting more pressure on democrats to strike a deal on daca at a g.o.p.

retreat and west virginia. >> we want an immigration policy that is fair, equitable, but that's going to protect our people. as the republican party, we have a great opportunity. we are getting very little help the democrats. they talk a good game with daca but they don't produce. if the democrats choose to filibuster a framework that includes a generous path to citizenship for something that's not fair, we are not going to approve it. we're just not going to approve it. we will either have something that's fair and equitable and good and secure or we are going to have nothing at all. it's now an election issue that will go to our benefit, not their benefit. >> jesse: mitch mcconnell says he will hold an immigration vote as soon as next week. in the house, nancy aim at the presidents daca dialogue. >> making statements about newcomers to the country and equating it in a criminal way. what is that about?

it has instilled fear. what he's doing brings tears to the eyes of the statue of liberty. instilled fear in the hearts of people who are concerned about our dreamers. >> jesse: so the differences, it looks like the republicans, greg, have a deal on the table and there is some bullet points and this is what they want. at the democrats are calling people names and using emotion. >> greg: to pose a question. this could lead to an ideological realignment on immigration by party. if trump turns the republican party into the path to citizenship party, making it possible for over 1.2 million people in limbo to obtain citizenship, and in effect saying we are all dreamers. everybody is a chance, not just mexico, but everybody. that's a big shift for the republicans and it's going to piss off and a lot of hard line right people. it's a realignment in the party.

if there were democrats saying no to this, what does that make them? you could see something happening long-term where the republicans become the party for immigrants on the democrats for resisting what is clearly an amazing deal. this is, 1.2 million people and it's amazing, talking about fixing up the house before people move in. you want people to move in cuba you need to make sure the walls are secure and there's a process to get in, front door. making it possible for the good to stay in the criminality to be removed. all he wants an exchange is a wall not much to ask for. >> jesse: if president trump is offering a pathway to citizenship for over a million people which he said during the state of the union was three times more generous than president obama's offer on the pathway to citizenship and all he wants an exchange art a lot of the same things democrats have voted for the past, where the democrats hopping on board? >> juan: he is cutting legal immigration. he wants to do away with what he

calls chain migration which actually is about the ability of families to stick together. used to be called family reunification. >> greg: but the family is, it's not just that, it's more than that. >> juan: that is the heart and soul of it. >> jesse: amnesty for 1.8 million people. >> juan: he wants to cut legal immigration. >> jesse: he wants it merits-based. >> juan: no, he wants to cut the absolute number. >> jesse: 75% of the country want to see a reduction. >> juan: he wants a cut in legal immigration. >> jesse: i'm sorry, juan. go ahead. >> juan: it's okay. i appreciate the point you and greg are making that may be trump's rhetoric is so harsh because he's got to please his base. and then he's going to take a step that says oh, no, base, i'm going to angry because movement to make a deal. maybe the way to its people like

me is boy, ms-13? making a lot out of this and now illegal immigrants are criminals and murderers. why is he saying this stuff? that's the way i heard it. >> greg: you should get that checked out. >> jesse: we have some sound of msnbc talking about ms-13 after the state of the union. >> he makes it sound like the biggest issue in the united states, that it's ms-13, again nobody that doesn't watch fox news has ever heard of. makes it sound like they are the biggest threat. >> jesse: all right, kimberly. >> kimberly: i can't take it. ms-13 is one of the most notorious, violent street gangs out there. they're quite organized. they are present in 46 states. they do a tremendous amount of horrific crime across the country. why is she thinking she should champion them? anybody who has any sense, law enforcement and what goes on the country in terms of track picking and the tribes they commit, they know what a serious problem layer to the country.

we sought earlier -- later last year, attorney general jeff sessions examining and doing some follow-up on ms-13 as well. under the obama administration they became the first and only street gang designated by the united states government as a transnational criminal organization. that's the status they achieved during the last administration and how they proliferated. >> dana: on the ms-13 thing, obviously they are terrible gang and the president showed that on tuesday night and a very moving way. but i would say there is some peril for republicans to push forward on ms-13. ed gillespie, ran for governor in virginia, he ran in and it was very tough on ms-13. he got more votes than any republican ever for the governor's race in the commonwealth of virginia, and he lost by nine points. i don't know if this is -- it's not the only issue. the dreamer issue is really

important. 2.5 million u.s. citizens live with daca eligible children. and then you have a state like colorado. you have a republican and a democratic senator, they support legalization for the dreamers. that's a 90-10 issue in colorado. he started to realize you can't lose that many senators in order for president trump to get his deal. the last and i would say is i hope when we talk about merit that we can include something about grit. we need people who want to come and work in the country. you don't need a masters degree to come in the country and succeed. >> greg: i would say master's degree works against you. they are highly overrated. i don't want more people going to college. i want less. >> jesse: you heard it here. greg gutfeld, education secretary. maxine waters next.

don't let it happen when you buy your diabetes test strips. with the accu-chek guide simplepay program, you pay the same low price. all without having to go through insurance. plus, they come in a spill-resistant vial along with a free meter. skip the guessing game and focus on your health. not the cost. make saving simple today at simplepaysaves.com. it can detect a threat using ai, and respond 60 times faster. it lets you know where your data lives, down to the very server. it keeps your insights from prying eyes, so they're used by no one else but you. it is... the cloud. the ibm cloud. the cloud that's designed for your data. ai ready. secure to the core. the ibm cloud is the cloud for smarter business. secure to the core. oh! there's one.a "the sea cow""

manatees in novelty ts? surprising. what's "come at me bro?" it's something you say to a friend. what's not surprising? how much money matt saved by switching to geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. ( ♪ ) with 33 individual vertebrae

and 640 muscles in the human body, no two of us are alike. life made more effortless through adaptability. the perfect position seat in the lincoln continental. ( ♪ ) like you do sometimes, grandpa? and puffed... in the lincoln continental. well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. it can be hard to get air out, which can make it hard to get air in. so i talked to my doctor. she said... symbicort could help you breathe better, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort contains formoterol. medicines like formoterol increase the risk of death from asthma problems.

symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. you should tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggies! get symbicort free for up to one year. visit saveonsymbicort.com today to learn more. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. why people everywhere are upgrading their water filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids. pour it through brita's two-stage filter. dissolved solids remain? what if we filter it over and over? (sighing) oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so, maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.

♪ >> dana: maxine waters made an appearance on b.e.t. to deliver her own rebuttal on the state of the union. still pushing for president trump's impeachment and also pushing for a presidential parental advisory. >> one speech cannot and does not make donald trump presidential. he is not presidential. he is a dangerous, unprincipled, divisive and shameful races. his vulgarity and his disrespect for women and people of color is a terrible role model for our children. whenever he appears on tv, there should be a disclaimer that says "this may not be acceptable for children." >> dana: greg, good line for speech or not? >> greg: i would love to live in that waters' world. every leader, you have to be honest, foulmouthed, part of the

job. we are in the era were people telling you or record you. the thing that drives me crazy are the stories to begin with donald trump erupted an x or donald trump exploded at x. if you were in the workplace, people do yell at people, and then move on. when you are ticked off about something, you yell. when i first got to fox and i was doing redeye and i didn't know what the hell i was doing him i was screaming at inanimate objects. trump reads the newspaper and he will yell "what the hell is going on question" i think a lot of liberals are unfamiliar. >> dana: wasn't true that bill clinton was notorious for having a foul mouth. the media, if you heard it, not you, you sort of underplayed it. now everything is out in the open. >> juan: i think the differences, lyndon johnson, these guys did have foul mouth. the difference, not only in front of the camera but within earshot of people these days. i think that the president takes back to a different level.

i think his base seems to embrace the fact that he's a truth teller and he is not a pc guy. it's not just maxine waters. i've hurt other people say they don't want children in front of the political tv. >> dana: children should be doing homework, right, kimberly? >> kimberly: yes. >> dana: wright, ronan? >> he's got a reading assignment tonight. when you see the president around children, whether it's easter or on the lawn of the white house, he absolutely loves children. he loves his grandkids. he can't get enough of having them come visit being around them. that's one thing that you see him light up. children are his -- he loves them. his reaction when he saw the children who were killed in

syria as well. for her to say that he's not suitable for children is just, you know, it has no authenticity. it rings so hollow. seems she was trying to demonize him regardless of what he said and what he did and she will go to any length, including calling him a racist which is a strong statement, a terrible thing say about someone. >> dana: do you think she believes it or she just had a good line for speech. >> jesse: it was a good line. maxine waters, no relation. but i don't take her seriously. what makes donald trump presidential is he won the electoral college. >> greg: that would be the best talk show waters and watters. you would probably get along famously. >> dana: had come at the best tax reform bonus.

twinkies. sfx: muffled whistle text alert. i'm your phone, stuck down here between your seat and your console, playing a little hide-n-seek. cold... warmer... warmer... ah boiling. jackpot. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, you could be picking up these charges yourself. so get allstate, where agents help keep you protected from mayhem... ...like me. mayhem is everywhere. are you in good hands? stay with me, mr. parker. when a critical patient is far from the hospital, the hospital must come to the patient. stay with me, mr. parker. the at&t network is helping first responders connect with medical teams in near real time... stay with me, mr. parker. ...saving time when it matters most. stay with me, mrs. parker.

that's the power of and.

on the only bed that adjusts on both sides to your ideal comfort your sleep number setting. and snoring? does your bed do that? right now during the ultimate sleep number event, our queen c2 mattress with adjustable comfort on both sides is only $699, save $200. ends soon. visit sleepnumber.com for a store near you.

♪ >> greg: the great thing about a good economy: everyone gets a piece of the pie. that includes fruit pies, doughnuts, ding-dong's. hostesses giving workers one-time payments of 1250 bucks. also offering a year's worth worth of free food. one multipack of their favorite item a week. i would eat that in an hour. why look a gift horse in the mouth especially when the gift is for your mouth. these free snacks, they really are perfect simple. no one is getting free kale under trump. but here is your ho-ho. slashing the u.s. corporate tax

rate. this is hostess, who filed for bankruptcy under president obama and even shut down under that president. now the tax change gives the company that chance to increase compensation, sharing the company's success with its workers. that's good news even if it makes you fat. i know the response we are going to get from the pelosi bot. this is just crumbs. she is right for once. there will be crumbs from all the free food given from a company that found new life in a climate that makes it possible. it's a bigger story, one of pure pressure profit sharing. one company looks at another company giving bonuses and sets i think we better do that too. if pelosi or debbie wasserman schultz can see the goodness and that, then there is the real ding-dong. finishing on a pun, dana. >> dana: you are going to out them out right now. >> greg: this corporate tax rate is helping this company.

>> dana: let them eat cake. what's interesting, the american public is watching a real-life economic 101 lesson. you don't have to go to youtube or anything. you can say if you allow companies to have more money in their coffers and the economy is good, they will want to keep their employees and reward them. it's a supply and demand thing. i would ask them if i could get an extra $5 a week instead of the calories. >> greg: i open this up and i have to ask him why does it have to be white, juan. didn't they do chocolate twinkies for a while? that was amazing. bring that back. >> dana: they have the other ones. they had zingers. >> greg: juan, this is good news. it's not crumbs. >> juan: i am amused by the

spread like trump saying this is the biggest tax cut upper and of course that's not true. >> dana: if this had happened under president obama, like if you done the tax cut like he wanted, and these companies were giving bonuses, you have to wonder what the right would be saying. they would be saying it's not enough. >> juan: is not enough. okay. check my thought is, will make a run street. wall street is saying this is less than 1% of the workers in the country getting anything and most of the money is going to be used either to buy back stock for the companies, increased dividends for shareholders, or increase executive pay. if you give -- >> greg: 401(k)s. >> juan: less than half the country has a 401(k). >> jesse: 40% of america is a lot of america. >> juan: if you think is beneficial to the entire country, it's beneficial to people who already have money. >> jesse: okay, everybody has a little money and it is beneficial to everybody because

according to ap, this is hot off the press. tax bill beginning to deliver bigger paychecks to workers. this is what they said. 90% of americans are getting a tax cut. that's a lot of americans. average middle class family getting $1,000 in tax relief this year. some guy said he just got an extra $200 of his paycheck. ups just announced $13,000 per worker going into their pensions. lowe's is offering $1,000 bonuses. this is big money, real money. i'm glad you say you want workers to get more money. i'm glad you're finally come around. juan is a tax cutter. >> juan: what i worry about, because i care about you so much, i don't want you walking in times square because of those guys are playing three card monte, you would fall for it. >> jesse: i have, and i will admit it.

>> greg: you are the hostess with the most -- mostest. this is got to put a smile on many peoples faces, including my own. >> kimberly: it is sweet. why not celebrate the successes and that tax reform is resulting in more dollars in people's pockets which is going back into the economy, into the stream for purchasing power, consumerism. i like the companies are treating their plays well. maybe if they work for twinkies, they really love them. they will be happy to take all of them home. >> greg: of other companies that we are going to give what you work on, you can take it home. like we would get free news. fox gives us a big pile of newspapers to take home. >> juan: they should give us real news. >> greg: [laughs] >> juan: walmart says they are

going to give you stuff and then they fired 10,000 people from sam's club. >> greg: that is a different segment. scientists prove -- i am better looking than juan. i will let him explain. it's

♪ >> juan: i'm not so sure about this story. i'm going to ask you. you decide. a recent survey has determined that republicans are usually better looking than democrats. researchers claim a person's physical attractiveness can alter their political views, their worldview. if you are good looking, you are more, allegedly so, more likely to identify as a conservative because you've been treated better in life and view the world is more fair. that, the logic goes, makes conservatives more resistant type of social welfare and reduced emission programs championed by liberals. i'm going to ask the pretty people at the table, beginning with miss kimberly, does this make sense? >> kimberly: greg is like "what about me?"

what would you like to know? >> juan: what do you think? >> kimberly: i don't know. both sides on that partisan divide. >> greg: she married the other side. >> juan: you are married to a democrat. >> greg: he was a looker. >> kimberly: interesting premise. you can always find supporting documentation to support whatever kind of thesis you have going forth. i don't know. for me, i grew up in a very, very liberal city, you know, married the other side, divorced the other side. married the other side, divorced the other side. i don't know. >> juan: at least you were consistent. they find you attractive. >> dana: that's a nice complement. i don't necessarily believe this.

have you seen hollywood? models, the entertainment industry. they are beautiful people and they are almost all liberal. >> kimberly: like gisele. >> dana: like all of them. >> juan: this picture, full screen of a liberal and conservative. who is more attractive. >> greg: oh, my god. >> jesse: more attractive? beauty is on the inside. this is scientific. if you disagree, you are a science denier. >> juan: is that it? that. like smaller government and states' rights, like you might if you are in wyoming, then

therefore you aren't a compassionate person because you aren't for social welfare distribution. that's baloney because actually the policies are better to help people, well for tort work, these things are better. there are compassionate people who are conservative as well. >> juan: out to the most beautiful person of the table, mr. greg. >> greg: it is half right. really good looking people do have it easy. it's the one in a quality that nobody wants to talk about but it is there. studies. to your point about hollywood, and ugly person can't make it in hollywood unless you are a character actor. but really good looking people do better in business. they do better in job interviews. and it's an inequality that cuts across race and gender and sexual orientation. people trust people with certain facial characteristics. >> kimberly: they do baby

studies on this. >> greg: they do. it also results in laziness and coasting. i know a lot of good-looking people who are couch surfers because they thought they were to get far on your looks and they didn't. do your point, the secular part, the interpretation is incorrect because they say good looking people become conservatives because they are unfamiliar with injustice and suffering. when in fact you could argue that conservatives are more compassionate because they believe in individual power over the reliance on government. you could say conservatives care more about people because they are willing to tell the people to work on themselves which is a very hard thing to tell people. >> jesse: taller people tend to do better. >> greg: yes, it's true. >> jesse: chalets have been -- studies have been shown. >> greg: there is no movement for this. >> dana: i don't know if you are helping yourself. >> greg: there is no movement for that kind of thing and why shouldn't there be for height? there is no gandhi for ugliness.

>> juan: i could be gandhi -- what if i were more makeup? let's not go too far. "one more thing" up next.

it's ok that everyone ignores me while i drive. it's fine. because i get a safe driving bonus check every six months i'm accident free. and i don't share it with mom! right, mom? righttt. safe driving bonus checks. only from allstate. switching to allstate is worth it. ♪ >> kimberly: hello, it's time for "one more thing."

juan. >> juan: ellen degeneres invited michelle obama on their tv show. first appearance since leaving the white house. she said some people are afraid in the current political environment so she offered a prescription that comes from someone who has lived in the political spotlight for eight years. >> i would just encourage your viewers, the country, to do the things we do every day. love each other, take care of each other, show empathy. you can't do that only when people make you feel good or safe. we've got to do it all across the board. we have to be an openhearted nation, and that's who we are. let's keep living our lives like that and forget what they are staying in washington. that's not necessarily who we are. >> kimberly: she's fantastic. >> juan: did you like it? >> greg: i disagree. i think everybody should be mean and hateful" hearted.

ellen is 60? >> jesse: she looks good. >> greg: i hope i look half as good. >> kimberly: do you have ellen envy? >> greg: greg's wasted alcohol news. this story, i love this story because a, i hate champagne. it's basically hyper carbonated miller lite. let's be honest. anyone who spends $42,000 on a champagne deserves to drop it. this is a guy. [laughter] $42,000 bottle. i don't know. he probably could afford it. trying to say i don't need this. why champagne? why did it get elevated to something special?

>> dana: lord bates from burton britain, a minute late for work. it was no laughing matter. he was very apologetic. >> offer my sincere apologies for my discourtesy for not being in my place to answer very important matter. i am thoroughly ashamed. i should be offering my resignation. immediate. >> dana: it is very british. he packed his things and left. thought he was joking. theresa may rejected his resignation. because he is a rule follower, he returned to work. >> jesse: new addition of mom texts.

amen. [laughter] [laughter] i want to give a special shout out to "swamp people" star, recovering from hip replacement surgery. >> kimberly: this is something interesting for me because i love following crime stories. natalie wood, nearly 40 years after her mysterious death, her ex-husband is in fact more than a person of interest in her death. this has been characterized by the los angeles county sheriff's department. she died november 29, 1981,

while she was sailing on a yacht with robert wegner and other people. classified as an accident. we'll see what happens. set your dvrs. never miss an episode of "the five." "special report" up next. >> bret: president trump reads the memo about surveillance activities on his own campaign. we await the call from the president on whether you get to read it. the president rips into democrats favor in action on immigration as lawmakers consider a pared down reform plan, the fight inside and outside the republican party for paid family leave. this is "special report" ." good evening. welcome to washington. i am bret baier. it now seems to be a matter of when, not if, president trump will authorize the release of a currently classified memo about alleged surveillance abuses by the fbi. exactly which version of the document will be revealed is also