tv Happening Now FOX News February 5, 2018 8:00am-9:00am PST
8:00 am
>> they planned that move out since last january. that's foot ball planning. >> celebrating by holding his baby girl lily at the end was a neat moment. bill hemmer back tomorrow and at the game. hopefully he stayed warm in chilly minneapolis. "happening now" starts right now. >> jon: we begin with a fox news alert on the firestorm over that republican memo. while the president gets ready to hit the road on this monday morning. good morning to you. i'm jon scott. >> melissa: did you watch the game? >> jon: of course i did. >> melissa: it was awesome. >> jon: great super bowl. >> melissa: back to serious stuff. the president set to leave the white house later this hour for a speech in cincinnati followed by the continuing fallout over the fisa memo. the president now says it is totally vindicated and intelligence chairman devin nunes says despite the criticism, republicans did the right thing. >> a footnote saying that something might be political is
8:01 am
a far cry from letting the american people know that the democrats and the hillary campaign paid for dirt that the f.b.i. then used to get a warrant on an american citizen to spy on another campaign. and it's a very dangerous precedent that was set. >> jon: the top democrat on the committee says this has nothing to do with transparency. here is adam schiff. >> they voted that down. they voted against hearing from the f.b.i. when you do oversight you haul them in under oath saying why was this and that included? the interest wasn't oversight. the interest was a political hit job on the f.b.i. in the service of the president. >> melissa: now democrats want their own memo released. a vote on that set for later today. chief white house correspondent is live with the latest. busy monday. >> as it is every week here, melissa, no question about that. the house intelligence committee will gather at 5:00 this afternoon for a business meeting to discuss whether or
8:02 am
not to release and send that democratic rebuttal to the republican memo to the president for his review. sources tell fox news that this democratic memo portrays devin nunes and trey gowdy as misleading the american public with the republican member and talks about possible collusion between the trump campaign and russia to influence the election. the president weighing in. little adam schiff who is desperate to run for higher office is one of the biggest liars and leakers in washington up there with comey, warner, brennan and clapper. adam leaves closed committee hearings to leak confidential information. must be stopped. clearly adam schiff caught a whiff of that because he tweeted right back at the president. mr. president, i see you've had a busy morning of executive time. instead of tweeting false smears the american people would appreciate if you turned off the tv and helped solve the funding crisis, protect the dreamers or really anything else. the chairman of the intelligence committee devin
8:03 am
nunes had a similar assessment of his democratic colleague as the president did. >> mr. schiff knows he is spreading false narrative there. but that's not new for him. he spread false narrative the entire time. the democrats were well aware that i did not leak information. however, for a year they stayed quiet. they continued, they advocated for my removal from the committee. >> president trump backed up nunes in a tweet last hour saying nunes will someday be recognized as a great american hero for what he has exposed and had to endure. as for the republican memo the president claimed exoneration over the weekend and learning about the fact that the fisa warrant was derived from that unverified dossier. the president tweeting this memo totally vindicates trump in quotation marks in probe. talking about the campaign
8:04 am
there. the russia hunt goes on and on. there was no collusion or no obstruction. after one year of looking endlessly and finding nothing, collusion is dead. this is an american disgrace. however, south carolina congressman trey gowdy who co-wrote the republican memo said wait a minute here, the memo is not the final word on the russia investigation. listen. >> there is a russia investigation without a dossier. to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the fisa process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at trump tower, it has nothing to do with an email sent by cambridge, the dossier has nothing to do with george papadopoulos's meeting in great britain. it also doesn't have anything to do with obstruction of justice. so there is going to be a russia probe even without a dossier. >> there is going to be a russia probe even without a dossier. the mueller investigation continues unabated. we don't know when it will end
8:05 am
or what else is to come down the pike. the president turning his attention to tax reform going to cincinnati for a big tax reform speech. he is also thinking about daca and we also expect that maybe, just maybe, melissa, he just might mention this memo in his speech in cincinnati. if i were a betting man. >> melissa: oh boy, john roberts. thank you. >> jon: here now with more kathryn lucy, white house reporter for the associated press. we understand that the house will vote today, the house committee votes whether or not to release the democrats counter point to the republican memo. what are the chances that actually gets released? >> well, we expect maybe a vote today. there is some time to go before that committee hearing. the big question is does it get out? it didn't last week. if it does, it could come to the white house for a review and then we have to see what happens there. it could go a similar process to the republican memo.
8:06 am
>> jon: i was surprised reading the republican memo. critics said it reveals sources and methods. i did not see anything of the kind in there, did you? >> i think the question the critics are raising is whether this kind of process information should be put out there at all. so there are questions about that. obviously it didn't put to rest the investigation, either. as you saw the comments from trey gowdy, the investigation continues. it doesn't fully clear the president or anything like that. >> jon: the investigation continues, he seemed to say, but republicans are also saying that the investigation would not have reached this point had it not been for the perhaps erroneous reliance on the steele dossier. >> what we know right now is that the investigation began without the dossier but that the dossier has played a part in the fisa process.
8:07 am
i think there is a lot more information we probably need to get to understand the full read on that. >> jon: the president -- i mean, despite his protestations, this memo doesn't clear him necessarily. >> the president said over the weekend this fully vindicates him. i think you saw a lot of republicans gowdy saying not so fast. there is still an investigation, aspects of an investigation that have to be resolved. >> it does raise the question of poll itization of intelligence. you have democrats and republicans looking at highly classified stuff and sort of reaching their own conclusions about what it means and where it should go. >> certainly raises questions about intelligence and also raises questions are you setting a precedent in terms of what gets released to the public during an investigation. >> jon: but the public, it is
8:08 am
interesting to read exactly what the court relied on and who -- what the court was presented with. now i guess democrats are saying, what, that we don't have the whole picture of how big a role the steele dossier played in what the court, what the fisa court decided to do with regard to surveillance of carter page? >> that's right. democrats are saying that the republican memo is not a full explanation of the process. that is why they're pushing to release their own memo saying it will provide more information on what went into this fisa process. >> jon: has the democrats' memo been fully vetted? that's what republicans say they did with theirs. >> i think it is still in process. as you said earlier, the committee still has to decide whether they would release it if they did and if there is classified information in it, the white house then would have to do their own review as they did with the republican memo
8:09 am
and decide how to proceed. >> jon: kathryn, the white house correspondent for the associated press at the white house right now. thank you. >> melissa: another deadly amtrak crash this time in south carolina. the feds are now saying the train was likely on the wrong track. we'll have the latest with that. plus two senators unveiling a new immigration plan missing one major item that has president trump already saying no deal. we'll tell you what that item is, but first here is the president from the republican retreat last week. >> president trump: they talk a good game with daca. but they don't produce. and so either they come on board or we will have to really work and have to get more people so we can get the kind of numbers that we need to pass in a much easier fashion legislation.
8:12 am
8:13 am
man faced second degree murder charges after police say he gunned down off duty fire captain kyle brier after an altercation. it seems right before the shooting brier was riding in a golf cart. he approached the driver and was shot in the head. he died at the hospital a short time later. police identify the suspect as parks, they say he initially ran from the scene but turned himself in hours later after seeing media reports describing his car. >> melissa: briefing right now the senate looking to hammer out a new immigration deal to avoid another budget stand-off. senators john mccain and chris coons unveiling a bipartisan plan to protect dreamers providing a path to citizenship and set aside money for border security but they aren't funding the wall. president trump saying that is a non-starter. tweeting this morning quote, any deal on daca that does not include strong border security and the desperately needed wall
8:14 am
is a total waste of time. march 5th is rapidly approaching and the dems seem not to care about daca. make a deal. lawmakers have until thursday to show some progress before government funding runs out. senator dick durbin is not optimistic. >> there is not likely to be a daca deal though we're working every single day, telephone calls and person to person to try to reach this bipartisan agreement. >> i think the president's position he is taking on the dreamers and daca is very bold. i think he has boxed the democrats in on that issue. i think it will be very difficult for them to walk away from. he is giving more than i probably would have given in the same advice to him. >> melissa: karl rove is a former senior advisor and deputy chief of staff for george w. bush and fox news contributor. do you think it has any traction and will it go anywhere? >> well, i don't think so. we have three proposals out
8:15 am
there. mccain/coons which says we'll fix daca, the dreamers will be able to remain and find a path to citizenship. we'll have a study in 2020 on what's needed for border security and what works. we will take 18, 19 and 20 and sometime in 20 we'll have a study how to secure the border. we'll spend $120 million over five years 20 million a year on improving the relationship between local law enforcement and the federal government. this is a longstanding existing program. the federal government gives local law enforcement money to participate in training so they know how to deal with illegal aliens. but this is a minor deal, minor. then we'll have 165 new immigration judges over the next three years plus attorneys to expedite removals from the countries and adjudicate the cases. in the greater scheme of thing minor. second action is kick the can down the road. keep the daca situation as it is today for one more year and then finally we have president
8:16 am
trump who says daca fix, do something about chain migration, get rid of the diversity lottery and str the wall and technology to defend the border. there is so much difference between these two it won't go anywhere. even if this doesn't go anywhere. this may be a situation where there has to be more than this and less than that in order to get something done. >> melissa: how do democrats justify opposing what the president is offering in the sense that how do they go back to two million dreamers and say we said no to your deal. we say no to citizens and protecting the border, because we're so upset about theoretical immigrants out in the future. >> look, the democrats do have a problem here because remember, they could have solved this any way they wanted to in 2009 and 2010 when they had overwhelming majorities in the congress. president obama had opposed comprehensive reform in 2007.
8:17 am
he did nothing in 2000 and 2010. he continued to say until 2012 that he didn't have the statutory authority, which i agree with him, he didn't have the statutory authority to affect a dreamers solution by executive order but he did in 2012 motivated by the fact that hispanic enthusiasm for reelection was low. they got to get something done on this, though. here is why. think about this. 1.8 million dreamers, most of them employed, they hold jobs. this uncertainty about whether or not they will be able to stay here will affect the labor market. it will affect their employers. imagine what would happen in overnight 1.2 million people working in am were told you can no longer work. it would be a disaster. the president's primary goal is to economic growth up. the gross domestic product is a combination of two things. labor and productivity. if you take a whole chunk of
8:18 am
laborers out and a whole bunch of workers it hurts economic growth. >> melissa: labor is good. so is consumption. they satisfy both those things. let me ask you, though, don't they have a playbook? they got tax reform through. don't they have a playbook getting something done even if democrats don't help? >> they can't, you need 60 votes in the senate. here is how it might play out. mccain/coons come to the senate floor. the senate, you can have lots of amendments. leader mcconnell has said he will have open debate. mccain/coons comes to the floor and gets amended and some things have to do with chain migration, some things have to do with border security, some things have to do with the wall or funding for the wall. and the senate passes a bill it can agree it. it goes to the house. the house will probably toughen it. they go back and forth pinging bills back and forth or going to a conference committee to
8:19 am
see if they can arrive at a solution. you end up somewhere in the middle. you have a lot more than mccain/coons but you might have something less than -- we'll give you money to fix the wall right now and build some 25 more miles or 50 more miles but we want a comprehensive study done but not a three-year study. we want it done in six months by the homeland security department to tell us where they want to build the wall and justify and come back to us. we'll give you money for technology, infrastructure and fix the existing wall and few more miles of wall. make a deal. >> melissa: i don't know how the democrats turn around and go back to the two mill dreamers and said we said no to you becoming citizens because of something off in the future with theoretical other immigrants. a real challenge for them. we'll see. karl rove, thank you so much. >> jon: after friday's massive stock sell-off will wall street be feeling more pain? we'll check in on the markets this morning.
8:20 am
plus late night host jimmy kimmel under fire for what he said about conservatives. our media panel weighs in on his comments. when i received the diagnosis, i knew at that exact moment, whatever it takes, wherever i have to go...i'm beating this. my main focus was to find a team of doctors that work together. when a patient comes to ctca, they're meeting a team of physicians that specialize in the management of cancer. breast cancer treatment is continuing to evolve. and i would say that ctca is definitely on the cusp of those changes. patients can be overwhelmed ... we really focus on taking the time with each individual patient so they can choose the treatment appropriate for them. the care that ctca brings is the kind of care i've wanted for my patients. being able to spend time with them, have a whole team to look after them is fantastic. i empower women with choices. it's not just picking a surgeon. it's picking the care team, and feeling secure where you are.
8:21 am
8:23 am
8:24 am
amtrak train crash in less than a week. investigators say the train in south carolina yesterday was on the wrong track and slammed into a freight train killing two people and injuring more than 100. it came less than a week after another amtrak train carrying republicans to a congressional retreat hit a train on the tracks in virginia killing one person and injuring several others. give us more details on this one, jonathan. >> hi, melissa, a terrible accident renewing calls for safety on america's railways. there is a gps-based safety system called positive train control or ptc, mon is torg the locations of trains and positions of switches and can prevent trains from going too fast or colliding. it is supposed to be fully implemented by the end of the year but previous deadlines have been extended. >> determining the exact status
8:25 am
of the installation of ptc will be something that's very important for us to find out. but to be clear ptc is designed to prevent this type of accident. >> today ntsb investigators plan to interview surviving members of the amtrak crew while memories are still fresh. they've recovered a forward facing video recorder from the train that could give clues to the train's speed before impact. the ntsb is trying to determine why a track switch was locked in the wrong position sending the train onto a side track where an empty csx freight train was parked. >> it just derailed. i don't remember much after that. knocked me out. >> the impact killed an engineer and conductor riding on board the locomotive. more than 100 people were injured. six of them remain hospitalized.
8:26 am
more details will come out this afternoon. >> melissa: thank you. >> jon: the philadelphia eagles soar to their first super bowl win. and it was all about gutsy plays like this one. >> the ball is down. philadelphia has it. >> jon: defense helping the team score a field goal and a 41-33 lead then an incomplete hail mary pass tom brady to gronkowski helped seal the victory. eagles players celebrated on the field, fans back home mobbed the streets for their celebrations. many flocked to broad street where the crowd stretched for a half mile. things got a bit out of hand. we'll have it all in a live report coming up. >> melissa: the war over dueling memos heating up on capitol hill.
8:27 am
the white house says the memo proves bias at the f.b.i. does it? we'll debate next. >> this is part of a pattern we've seen within the f.b.i. and department of justice. really it began under james comey and it regarded the hillary clinton email investigation. you saw investigators make decisions there that didn't make a lot of sense, didn't add up. and allowing politics to influence decision making. now we're seeing that continue.
8:31 am
>> jon: we're learning new details about christopher steele, the guy who compiled the trump dossier. fox news obtained the unclassified version of a criminal referral requested by the republican chairman of the senate judiciary committee. catherine herridge is live in washington with the details on that. >> thank you, jon, the republican chairman of the senate judiciary committee chuck grassley and lindsey graham sent a criminal referral to the justice department last month asking for an investigation of the former british spy who put together the dossier and whether he lied to the f.b.i. about his contacts with the media. fox news obtained the unclassified version of the referral. it is heavily redacted. the senators write about another stream of information that was going to steele. the unclassified criminal referral reads in part it is troubling enough that the clinton campaign funded mr. steele's work but that these
8:32 am
clinton associates were feeding mr. steele allegations raises additional concerns about his credibility. the senators are now asking the f.b.i. and justice department for an emergency declassification review of this document i just showed you that is so heavily redacted. they say a lot of the information was declassified friday in that house memo and just as one example of what appears to be overclassification by the f.b.i. and justice department there is a reference to a "washington post" report that appears to be about the dossier but the entire section is blacked out, jon. >> jon: even though it's material that would have been available to anybody who wanted to read the "washington post". >> that's right. >> jon: fascinating stuff. great job. >> melissa: the debate continues to rage over the nunes memo. president trump says it vindicates him of any collusion. democrats, though, shockingly disagree. >> the investigation didn't
8:33 am
begin with carter page but began with george papadopoulos. someone a foreign policy advisor for candidate trump and meeting secretly with the russians and talking about the stolen clinton emails. >> i don't think it has any impact on the russia probe. >> the memo has no impact on the russia probe. >> not to me it doesn't. i was involved in the tracking of it. >> the fact that the republicans in the house refuse to allow a minority report, the democratic response to their memo, is an indication that they are just bound and determined to continue to find ways to absolve this president from any responsibility. >> we had collusion, conspiresy, people accused of treason. no one is making that allegation anymore. dianne feinstein said there is no evidence of collusion and that's the point the president is making. >> melissa: let's bring in our panel. richard fowler is a fox news contributor and radio talk show
8:34 am
host. brad blakeman is a form assistant to george w. bush. brad if we're trying to figure out who may have helped the russians or colluded with them among americans does the memo absolve the president of that search? >> i think the memo sheds light on, if anything, the incompetence of bias of the f.b.i. the f.b.i. relied on a political hit job opposition piece by a british spy paid for through a pass-through company fusion gps by the democrats. and the fact that the court relied on this document i think is more telling about how the f.b.i. got this warrant in order to spy on a campaign than anything else. i would like to hear from the fisa judge. i want to know what relied on and what he was told. the f.b.i. could be criminally liable for getting a warrant they weren't entitled to based on the evidence offered to the court. donald trump is right, there is no evidence of collusion.
8:35 am
if anything, it shows bias on the part of the f.b.i. >> melissa: richard, you heard republicans there say no, it doesn't exonerate him entirely. that there still is a lot of trail to follow here. in terms of who cooperated. what do you think? >> i disagree with brad. in the package we saw there you saw trey gowdy, the republican, who has seen the underlying classifications. he saw the documents. nunes has not seen the document and nunes and his staff who authored the memos might have seen the dojts but nunes himself hasn't seen the documents. a lot of individuals spoken out haven't seen the documents. gowdy did look at them. comey said the fisa memo is the size of your wrist how thick it is. the fact we're speculating on a document or memo written by one side of the aisle with no input from the other side speaks to problems. >> melissa: we'll see from the
8:36 am
other side. it wasn't blocked, it has to go through the same vetting process the republicans did. >> this particular memo is one sided. if you listen to folks who have seen the intelligence like gowdy they indicate it doesn't vindicate the president at all because the don junior happened in trump tower, george papadopoulos is still the person that triggered the investigation and this memo confirms that. >> melissa: things need to be followed. here is governor radcliffe. >> i can tell you that i have looked at the underlying source documents which include moore revelations regarding bruce ohr and his wife nelly and connection -- there was a pipeline from the democratic national committee and more details will come out about that. who at the f.b.i. was aware of that? we're still determining that.
8:37 am
>> melissa: brad, you can't really get around this. if it's okay for one political party to go out and create a dossier like this and feed it into the f.b.i. to listen to another campaign i would wonder if the democrats if this is okay are comfortable with president trump doing that in 2018 or 2020. what do you think? >> this is not america. this is not our justice system to pin one party to sick a government agency on another. the f.b.i. was convinced hillary was going to win. they were trying to help her in the email investigation and this bogus collusion investigation. papadopoulos and page were wanna bes. they had no connection to the level of getting a warrant. this is crazy stuff. the court of public opinion. the american public is fed up with the f.b.i. and i'll tell you one thing, in this town the fact that nothing leaked with
8:38 am
regard to collusion or conspiracy against trump tells you everything. because if there was something there we would have heard it. >> melissa: are democrats comfortable with the idea of the rnc coming up with a dossier that was similar and going after whoever is running in 2018 or 2020 of taking the exact same steps? are democrats comfortable with that? >> that's a loaded question. the reason why i think it's a loaded question we don't know how much the steele dossier played in getting the carter page. >> melissa: it played a part. it played a part. >> a part. wait a minute. >> melissa: are you comfortable with that being put together and used again? >> apart could be 1% or a part could be 50%. 1% and 50% is a big variation between those two numbers. >> melissa: they said it would not -- >> because we know -- >> melissa: are you comfortable with democrats doing that 1%? >> it depends on what the f.b.i. used from this document and did they corroborate.
8:39 am
>> melissa: if they used it 1% are you comfortable with that? >> it all depends upon what is in the document. i'll give you an example. if my house was robbed and i hired a private investigate and he finds evidence that says his house was robbed and here is the fingerprints and turned it over to the police. are you saying the police shouldn't use that evidence because i paid for it? >> melissa: i think you are making another example and you didn't answer my question. >> that's the example. the variation is what matters here and what also matters is if the f.b.i. found additional information on top of that that corroborates that evidence. we have know they did based on the fact. >> melissa: they couldn't confirm it. the testimony said they couldn't confirm it. it was comey's testimony that they couldn't confirm it. we have to go. i want to mention mistakenly said john radcliffe was governor, he is a congressman. appreciate your time. >> jon: the disgraced former
8:40 am
usa gymnastics team doctor larry nassar the justice department is trying to deal with him offering more time in prison for molesting young athletes in his care. details ahead. plus late night host jimmy kimmel getting slammed on social media for what he said about conservatives saturday. our media panel on deck to break it all down. let's take a look at some numbers:
8:41 am
4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom... is a stroke. 80 percent of all strokes and heart disease? preventable. and 149 dollars is all it takes to get screened and help take control of your health. we're life line screening... and if you're over 50... call this number, to schedule an appointment... for five painless screenings that go beyond regular check-ups.
8:42 am
we use ultrasound technology to literally look inside your arteries... for plaque which builds up as you age- and increases your risk for stroke and cardiovascular disease. and by getting them through this package, you're saving over 50%. so call today and consider these numbers: for just $149 you'll receive five screenings that could reveal what your body isn't telling you. i'm gonna tell you that was the best $150 i ever spent in my life. life line screening. the power of prevention. call now tow to learn more.
8:43 am
8:44 am
that shook the sports world. more than 260 women and young girls came forward to accuse nassar of molesting them while they were under his care. >> to call devin nunes donald trump's lap dog would be an insult to dogs and lapse. he snot a lap dog. he is a retrieveer. >> jon: kimmel attacking conservatives as well during a progressive podcast over the weekend. he said that almost every tv talk show host in late night is liberal because that requires a level of intelligence. let's bring in our media panel. we have a media reporter for the hill. and a fox news contributor.
8:45 am
judy, this podcast is something that was put together by a bunch of former obama administration officials. they invited jimmy kimmel on and he says that if you are going to be a tv talk show host late night and you have to be intelligent and conservatives need not apply. >> liberals will find it funny. conservatives find it predictable and outrageous. i think jimmy kimmel should be working at msnbc which has an obviously anti-trump left of center open and obvious point of view. but look, i may agree with jimmy kimmel on the sorry state of our healthcare system and i may agree that our gun laws are outrageous but i think that suggesting that people who are conservative are not intelligent is over the top and over the line outrageous and smacks of the smug satisfaction that helped elect donald trump.
8:46 am
so i hope the hillary clinton viewers are happy but everybody else take note. this kind of smugness really is going to backfire. >> jon: one way to ensure you don't last long in network television is insult half your audience. >> he said it requires a certain level of intelligence. it requires a certain level of conformity. if i watch kimmel, colbert it's all the same thing. there was a great story last week that said is television headed for a dump on trump overload? perhaps we are. how many times can we just do the same thing one trick pony over and over again. to judy's point to say she agrees with jimmy kimmel on healthcare. she doesn't agree with jimmy kimmel. according to the daily beast they did a great report that kimmel gets his talking points for his monologue on healthcare directly from chuck schumer's office.
8:47 am
could you imagine johnny carson getting talking points from daniel patrick moynihan? carson didn't keep it political and why he didn't lose half his audience. kimmel has said i don't care if trump supporters watch. they are appealing to half the country and they don't seem to care. >> jon: there weren't a lot of barack obama jokes that kimmel passed along. >> this kind of openly political and partisan late night talk show host is what is driving young people away from late night tv and toward social media. less and less towards television. and i think that people like kimmel, he is talking to his audience which is liberal. if he wants to write off half of the country that's fine. have we gotten to the point where you can just write off people? ultimately they bite back and i think kimmel will see that in
8:48 am
his ratings eventually and as we all know, in tv that's what counts. >> jon: meanwhile criticism of the media from a member of the media, michael goodwin, who calls himself a liberal, wrote this in his latest column. he says thanks to the battle over the memo, that's the nunes memo, we also know with 100% certainty that the mainstream media is part of the swamp. the efforts by "the new york times" and the "washington post" among others to keep the memo from ever seeing sunshine were appalling before it saw the memo the times editorial page called it proof of the republican plot against the f.b.i. a post columnist warned president trump he would be making an historic mistake in releasing it. judy, you did say before this memo came out that you were concerned about it releasing sources and methods. did it do that? >> i don't think that it did. you know, jon, it is very hard to know that. what we do know is that the
8:49 am
f.b.i. said that the memo wasn't accurate. you could expect them to say that since it's critical of the f.b.i. but even trey gowdy said it did not show what donald trump said it showed, which is vindication of him. look, i think we have gotten to the stage now where things are so partisan that a grandstanding show like this really distracts us from what the committee, what robert mueller is supposed to be looking at, which is to what extent did the russians interfere in our election. and i think this is a very sad state of affairs. now the democrats want their response to the republican memo released. i think that ought to happen but this is all a side show. >> jon: and it could happen perhaps those wheels will get turning later today. joe, interesting right now there is the movie "the post" about the "washington post" and "new york times" uncovering government secrets. as michael pointed out they were advocating maintaining government secrets prior to the
8:50 am
release of the nunes memo. >> highly secretive pentagon papers around the vietnam war. it is supposedly an excellent movie. i quote the "wall street journal." having been in journalism all my life have never, ever seen the press corps fight so hard against transparency. we want to know if russians obviously meddled in our election. we do know they did. we do know the dnc and clinton campaign paid a foreign agent to obtain information from the russians to put into a dossier that was later presented to a judge under false pretenses not explaining exactly the political ramifications behind it to secure a fisa warrant. that's what we know right now. yet we barely hear anything about that side of the story and i understand it's because hillary clinton is not the president but still, it deserves to be covered. >> jon: more to come on that score. thanks very much joe and judy.
8:51 am
8:54 am
pushing for a vote on their own memo on fbi surveillance, chuck schumer saying not releasing it would confirm america's worst fears. so will the president okay its release. plus a bipartisan bill today? exactly one month for dreamers expires. it does not include the border wall, so will they go for it? >> all that, plus #oneluckyguy. we haven't had him for a while.
8:55 am
we' we're excited and pumped for his return. right now, a celebration 58 years in the making, with eagles fans taking it to the streets of philadelphia after they won their first super bowl championship last night. new york city newsroom with more on this. molly. >> you said thousands of eagles fans took to the street, causing damage and pretty riotess free-for-all super bowl victory. the big win happened out in minneapolis. crowds poured out of the crowd, including under the city's iconic broad street. streetlights were toppled, outside the ritz, a throng of people, windows smashed, including at the macy's, where glass littered the sidewalks. it was a long time coming.
8:56 am
the eagles last won in 1960. minor injuries reported, but no one was killed. the mayor's office released a statement, reading, tens of thousands came out and celebrated this amazing victory, and but for a handful of bad actors, it was peaceful and jubilant. only three arrests. the city is now planning a parade to celebrate the score of 41 eagles, 33 patriots, first major victory since the phillies won in 2008. >> melisa: it was a great game, molly, just a few bad actors. they're getting, you know, a bum wrap, but i don't know, it looked kind of violent from the video. we'll see. we're happy for the city of philadelphia, though. i'm wearing my green. all right, molly, thank you. a growing showdown on capitol hill over dueling memos from the house intelligence committee. will democrats get their investigation out in public?
8:57 am
r visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah! now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com. my dbut now, i take used tometamucil every day.sh yeah! now business is rolling in. it traps and removes the waste that weighs me down, so i feel lighter. try metamucil, and begin to feel what lighter feels like.
9:00 am
>> melisa: what a great game, my 7-year-old is an eagles fan, we had to all root for his team for sure. >> jon: came through. >> melisa: thanks for joining us. >> jon: outnumbered starts now. a vote could come as early as today to release a democratic memo on the fbi. democrats say it counters much of what was put out in the republican memo last week. if they release it, it will of course be up to president trump to decide whether to block it or not. this is "outnumbered", i'm sandra smith, trish regan, also from fbn, host of kennedy, kennedy, and joining us on the couch, chief national correspondent, ed henry is here, and he is outnumbered. >> this is great. here for the new set.
120 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on