foxnews.com, shows, then the story. send us an email or a tweet. tucker carlson is coming up next. have a great night, everybody. we will see you back in new york tomorrow at 7:00. ♪ >> tucker: good evening, and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." we've got some stunning news for you about the ongoing russia investigation. news that will challenge everything you thought you knew about the story. yesterday, we show you the terrifying extent to which vladimir putin's sinister tendrils have encircled the america body politic, crushing the very life from this republic. russian agents are so intent in undermining our democracy, they've taken to promoting our own bill of rights back to us. the second amendment specifically. we admit, we aren't exactly sure how that's bad. but adam schiff has assured us it is. because schiff is a prominent

member of congress and believes stomach appears on cable news, we believe him. tonight, we've learned the foreign subversion goes deeper than that. the russian conspiracy is so subtle, so crafty, such a hall of mirrors, the people warning us about russia are key players in russian conspiracy. the leaders of the witch hunts are witches. sound impossible? listen to this. last year, the director of national intelligence released a definitive report on the russia product propaganda efforts in this country. the force of that is from the russian television channel rt, which is run by the putin government. they engage in anti-u.s. messaging likely aimed at undermining the u.s. trust in democratic procedures." our government considers rt so dangerous that the channel has been forced to register as a foreign agent. artie employees who fail to register could face prison time.

no outlet in this country has been ever required to be doing that. who would go on to a channel like that, one whose sole agenda is to discredit and destroy thee american experiment? no one other than adam bennett schiff of burbank, california. you know him as adam schiff, the leading man of the -- and yet, adam schiff was part of that machine. seriously. here's an actual screenshot. we are not making this up. we can assure you that is indeed adam schiff, the one and only. in our appearance that we've reviewed, adam schiff's appearance, schiff promoted conspiracy theories of the government, that the men and women of our allies who lay their lives down -- here's a quote. we only see what the

intelligence community sees what we want to see. adam schiff said that on russian television. there must've been applause in the kremlin when he did. but schiff is not alone. congress men jim hines of connecticut also appeared on vladimir putin's television channel. on one occasion, he said this about the men in uniform and their civilian leaders. "the invasion of iraq, the great foreign policy mistake of the century." in that background, you can almost hear vladimir putin cackling with glee. here you have two prominent members of congress voluntary appearing on foreign propaganda outlets in order to undermine america's core institutions. as they may put it, doing the bidding of a hostile foreign power. tokyo rose went to prison for that. we aren't commending prison at this point. that something grand juries will have to make after an investigation into all of this. that could take years, not that justice has a timetable. in the meantime, schiff and

hines both are crews themselves immediately from any role in the russian investigation, including appearances on msnbc's primetime lineup. the special counsel will also take up the mysterious troubling case of the nonexistent photographs, this story broken by the daily mail hours ago. adam schiff had a phone call with russian pranksters who promised him compromising photographs of donald trump with the russian mob. schiff said his office was not fooled by the brink. the phone logs show otherwise. after the call, schiff's office contacted somebody they believe was ukrainian politicians seeking to set up a meeting at a foreign embassy where they could obtain those documents. huh! let's see. setting up meetings with foreign operatives with politically damaging information about a political component? we thought that was treason. adam schiff told us it was.

congressman marco can is a colleague of mr. schiff. thank you for coming on. >> glad to be here, tucker. >> tucker: the intelligence committee, our intelligence committee described him as a key component of the russia propaganda machine. here you have one of the leaders, grand inquisitors of the russia investigation appearing on it willfully being used by the russian government to propagandize our people, to undermine our democracy, to hack our way of life. why should he not recuse himself immediately from the investigation on the basis of that? >> i assume from the whole intro, you are doing that tongue-in-cheek. clearly, as you know, politicians are on many, many networks. i don't think he, as you are trying to describe, saying that rt is trying to undermine american democracy. i got the point. i get the point. i think we all get the point. >> tucker: i'm using the standard that everybody is using, the leaders of your party are using.

if you have contact with the russian government and particularly if you willingly participate in russian propaganda efforts -- -- >> tucker, you don't honestly believe that someone being on a network doing in appearance... you could've been on sugar content and food -- feeling it was on american intelligence gathering. i watched it today. is going on -- >> tucker, you're comparing that to what we know ultimately happened. there are people who set up meetings with the trump family in order to get information and you are trying to compare that to rt. i don't think that's very effective. >> tucker: adam schiff did exactly that last year. >> are you honestly -- if i go on fox network, therefore i'm tainted by fox forever? look. that wouldn't make a lot of sense. this is a >> tucker: he shook the hands with the russian ambassadors for the whole thing is a joke. we might as well if we are going

to use the standards keep to them. >> tucker, but i will agree with the joke, this memo that devin nunes after being forced to recuse himself from the investigation after doing, like, small town community theater, the one that he got out of the car, went to the white house to get info. the next day, "i got info" and he gave it to the white house? the fact that he directed this memo which we all know there is in that, i think that is more substantive than you making a tongue-in-cheek -- >> tucker: i'm not here to defend devin nunes. i think it raises important questions about what the criteria are the government is using to spy on americans. they are clearly quite low. >> tucker, the might find some agreement. along with many republicans and democrats, we have problems with fisa because we want to keep it tighter. i just think some of the people now trying to use the memo, if they knew it at that time, why

did they allow the reauthorization -- began, one more reason why that memo is such a joke. >> tucker: i'm with you on that. it doesn't discredit the memo, but to the real question. i want to ask you a real storage is broken in the daily mail that shows that adam schiff had a phone call with two comedians who believe that they were russians and they offered him photographs of donald trump with the russian model. he thought it was a prank. it's clearly a lie because he dispatched a member of the staff, rihanna will . she emailed them and said this. "i understand mr. schiff had a productive meeting for what would you like to make material available to mr. schiff through your embassy?" then she said, "let me know the best way to pick up those materials in washington." she emailed back the next day. "do you know we will have the meeting in washington to pick up the materials"? how was that not adam schiff's' office coordinating with foreign

agents to get damaging material on a political opponent? isn't that exactly what trend is being attacked or? >> not even close. but i think you ought to bring them in and ask him that. >> tucker: he accused me working with putin and never would come on again. how is that -- i was that okay? >> what they are significantly different. this is one of the issues -- nobody likes to be political -- the meeting they had at trump tower with the russian individual. i said it's mostly true. they came in the back door and we couldn't verify that they came in the back door. >> tucker: we talked about that forever. >> is a completely different situation! are you actually equating the two? >> tucker: i'm asking a very straightforward question. >> yeah, are you equating the two? because i don't. >> tucker: it doesn't even matter how it compared to anything else. in its own terms, is it all right for a ranking member, and ranking member of the intel community -- >> i think you need to ask him

so he can explain if it was what i believe see in your intro was that you said it was a comedian. >> tucker: he had the emails from his staff. >> he would be a great staff as to try to book on it. you are equating -- be when you can talk about what donald trump jr. did. >> you are equating it to a meeting that's very well-publicized that we know about now. we learned about it today. the other one, we've known forever. >> tucker: he was trying to get information from a boring government -- it's right here! let's put it on the screen again. >> if the best we have is rt and the russian comedian, is that really the best? >> tucker: we have an intel committee staff -- this is like >> devin nunes could do this. i'm surprised you are. i have a lot more respect for you are. >> tucker: you aren't going to engage? >> it's kind of ridiculous.

it really is. so far, what you're putting up today -- seriously, when you have the intro when i watched it, i thought it was tongue-in-cheek to prove a point. >> tucker: the first part was. but the democratic party has lost its mind. it is conducting a mccarthy- mccarthy-ite which witch hunt. >> you're saying that committing treason... >> tucker: i'm here to defend the basic civil liberties i grew up with. >> i think you and i probably have some agreement on that. >> tucker: why don't you get on this and talk about it later. >> i will take that later. >> tucker: appreciate it. spats over russia are distracting from the real issue of the nunes menu i they show that i can send hosting the full measure has herself said she was the of government surveillance. michelle, thank a lot for coming on. you spent years on this question with basically no support from

their colleagues in the media or relatively little. are you surprised by the posture in the press which is, it is wrong to want to know more about who the government is buying on? >> well, i'm not. as i've written in the last couple of years and spoken to, i think the press while there are still many good reporters doing independent reporting, it's getting harder. we've invited some of the propaganda into our newsrooms, we allow them to dictate the talking points and messages du jour. it's difficult to find down the middle, unbiased reporting. >> tucker: should and the default position of a journalist be more information rather than less? we learned last week of the possibility that the u.s. government spying on a u.s. citizen on the basis of pretty flaky information, was it weird to see reporters stand up and say, tell us no more! we don't want to know! you are unpatriotic if you don't want to know? >> i've never seen anything like it. i've never in my lifetime seen open government groups and that

journalists so incurious and begging not to be told about alleged or supposed violations of citizens rights. this leads into a much larger picture of surveillance and abuse that occurred over the past 10-20 years involving citizens, politicians, journalists. >> tucker: just to do the opposite of putting our fears to rest, this is not as uncommon as we hope it is, is it? >> i think not. long before trump announced running for president, i had intel contacts who i'm still in touch with who have said that for a long time there has been a presentation of bad evidence from the fisa court to justify warrens, there has been a reverse engineering when political figures want to target people illegal. they find someone in their orbit they can target and capture them incidentally and then accidentally capture their data and unmask them acting surprised that's who it was when that's the target they intended to capture all along.

>> tucker: that's totally wrong. you are the first to call attention to one of this thing. we are grateful for that. thank you. >> thanks. >> tucker: david garo is a historian who's written excessively on the fbi in a number of different books. in a piece for today's "wall street journal," he says some members of congress and some democrats think we are reverting to the j. edgar hoover era in the treatment of the fbi. make it for coming on. we searched -- >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: the last honest liberal who will commit to the -- when you hear people say the fbi would never do that, you are attacking our guardians by asking that question, is there some historical precedents? >> i'm very worried, tucker, about how people are giving up their principles, their civil liberty principles because of the intensity of their partisan hatred for president trump. as you know, i'm a liberal democrat.

but what we've got here is democrats forgetting the history of the fbi. and taking up these anti-civil liberty stances defending the fbi simply because of how intensely opposed they are to president trump. the fbi does not have a good pedigree on electronic surveillance practices and everything i'm aware of as a liberal democrat is what the bureau has been really deceptive with the foreign intelligence court in applying this extended electronic surveillance of carter page, the volunteer trump advisor. liberals and progressives should oppose the fbi's behavior targeting mr. page. >> tucker: on civil liberties grounds, having nothing to do with the larger investigation, but any american citizen is having their civil liberties

violated. liberals should care, recollect mexico based primarily mexico based and extensively it appears on the dodgy dossier. the steele dossier is c-r-a-p. the fbi relied on that's going to federal judges to survey all american citizens, that's offensive to me as a liberal democrat. >> tucker: david garo, author of the definitive biography of the last president barack obama. thanks to the -- will it make democrats reconsidered, and some republicans, their support for the fecteau open borders. we will find out next. stay tuned.

what is the power of pacific? it's life insurance and retirement solutions to help you reach your goals. it's having the confidence to create the future that's most meaningful to you. it's protection for generations of families, and 150 years of strength and stability. and when you're able to harness all of that, that's the power of pacific. ask a financial advisor about pacific life.

on the only bed that adjusts on both sides to your ideal comfort, your sleep number setting. does your bed do that? right now, save 50% on the ultimate limited edition bed. ends soon. visit sleepnumber.com fora store near you. ♪ wild thing ♪ applebee's handcrafted burgers. any burger just $7.99. now that's eatin good in the neighborhood. smile dad. i take medication for high blood pressure and cholesterol. but they might not be enough to protect my heart. adding bayer aspirin can further reduce the risk of another heart attack. because my second chance matters. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen.

youyou know what's not awesome? gig-speed internet. when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids, and these guys, him, ah. oh hello. that lady, these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them.

uh huh, sure. still yes! xfinity delivers gig speed to more homes than anyone. now you can get it, too. welcome to the party. >> tucker: nfl player edwin jackson of the indianapolis indianapolis colts appears to be the next high-profile crime crime us here illegally. his ridesharing available was hit by a twice deported guatemalan immigrant who was driving drunk without a license. no reason to say that these countries politicians are steadfast and determined to let him stay. a recent chart by axial's hands at y. democrats are dominant in districts that have a high immigrant population. they know the math, they know they've animated middle america,

they cannot win without it. the democrat representing seattle, washington, joins us tonight. congress woman, thank you for coming on. >> happy to be here. >> tucker: you recently said of the trump immigration proposal targets "people of color" and it advances hayfield agenda. i guess i'm willing to believe that. but the proposal would give amnesty, then citizenship, to about 2 million immigrants here illegally. almost all of them people of color. how is that whites are premises? >> well, let me just start by saying what he's proposing. first of all, trump is the person who actually made 1.8 billion 1.8 million people the portable. before he rescinded daca, they all had -- then he said, okay, i'm going to take this group of young people hostage. across the country, one 90% of americans believe there should be a solution for these

dreamers. he said, i'm going to hold them hostage. the ransom is going to be an ever moving target, the latest target is we are going to cut legal immigration by 22 million, we are going to have to get rid of the diversity visa. we are going to need to get $20 million on the border. all of a sudden, 1.8 million immigrants he made the deportable to trade them for -- but when we are getting breaking news that immigration >> tucker: to clear, for most of american history, we have not had a million illegal immigrants coming to the country every year. that has not been the rule for our history. even close to it. if the stomach what you referred to became law, we get the 1990s level of illegal immigration. his bill clinton a white the

pharmacist too? >> the cornerstone has always been -- the republican party used to be a party of family values. i don't know if anybody's claiming that today. the reality is immigration is all about making sure that we continue to have people here who can do the work we need to do, have done who can contribute to the diversity of the country, their skills -- be when that sounds reasonable. why not judge people on that basis? i think they are related to someone here. we don't look for the most talented people -- do you have a relative who lives here? he would never hire your congressional staff on that basis. you never say, hey, i'm going to take your cousin because he's her cousin. >> that's a faulty premise, because you are assuming they don't bring anything other than being a relative of a family. >> tucker: no, no, and the electorate look, i think it's great when families are unified. i am very pro-family. when you're trying to make the

country as impressive as you possibly can. why would you choose the most impressive, possible people -- >> we are bringing the most impressive people. if you look at technology companies, the enormous number of people who are immigrants who started those covenants, small businesses, same thing. you look at any field of science, research -- me when i'm not arguing against started those covenants, small >> tucker: citizens who came in here and their parents, and their siblings, possibly their grandparents and uncles too. >> that's not too. what you said is not true but we don't allow grandparents into this country. we don't allow countries to to my cousins to come in. we don't have any categories along that. if you listen to your show, the people on fox news, to donald trump -- hold on, tucker. let me finish my point. if you listen to just what's going on, you would think the family immigration system is somehow out of control.

it's not. it took me 17 years to become a u.s. citizen. by the time i could become a u.s. citizen, my parents were already elderly and it would've taken another -- be when you met with my mr. -- >> that's just not what we are talking about. we are talking about -- no, it's not. what i'm saying is, we need to have an immigration system that actually recognizes the needs of our economy, the needs of our communities. >> tucker: is there any other country that should have its standards apply to it quite makes because there's plenty of countries. you look at canada. they have a very substantial family-based immigration system. they allow a lot of refugees and immigrants. they have different systems all over the world. >> tucker: the congress woman, we're out of time. give me one more sentence.

>> i will quote lindsey graham, we can cut illegal immigration immigration. >> tucker: american is in an idea. it's an actual people. i'm not an idea. i am a person. >> i think the idea of who we are and what we bring with our diversity and people all over the country, all over the world -- >> tucker: that's a decision americans can make. i appreciate you, congresswoman, coming on the show. >> thank you. [phone ringing] need a change of scenery? the kayak price forecast tool tells you whether to wait or book your flight now. so you can be confident

you're getting the best price. giddyup! kayak. search one and done.

like you do sometimes, grandpa? and puffed... well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. it can be hard to get air out, which can make it hard to get air in. so i talked to my doctor. she said... symbicort could help you breathe better, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement

of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort contains formoterol. medicines like formoterol increase the risk of death from asthma problems. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. you should tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggies! get symbicort free for up to one year. visit saveonsymbicort.com today to learn more. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. in your noise-canceling trusteheadphones? maybe not. maybe you could trust your flight attendant won't be the chatty type. hello everyone, welcome aboard, i'm jason with a y. maybe you could trust your seatmate will be an introvert. i've been to south america, i've been to mexico, i've been to... maybe you could trust everyone will settle in for 10 hours of peace and quiet. (baby crying) (ice rattling) (singing & drum banging) i got to tell you i'm excited for these long flights. i love them because it gets me out of the house.

or, you could just trust duracell. (silence) (♪) >> many of you who read my book about what happened, i think my size and knee and sexism was part of that campaign. it was one of the contributing factors, some of it was old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women, and the equality of women's leadership. >> tucker: even a majority of american women voted for a trump all women lost when hillary did. just yesterday, blaming sexism for her 2016 defeat which is still on top of her mind. just days after she was denounced tolerating sexual harassment on her very own campaign team. watch. >> the use of my email account

was turned into, you know, the biggest scandal since lord knows when. >> i was on the way to winning until a combination of jim comey's letter on october 28th, and russia liquor wikileaks were scared off. if you look at facebook, the vast majority of the news items posted were fake. there's all these stories about guys over in macedonia who are running these fake new sites. he certainly interfered in our election. it was clearly interfered to hurt me and to help my opponent. there was a voter suppression. people trying to prevent other americans from being able to vote. i also think i was a victim of a very broad assumption i was going to win. i inherited nothing from the democratic party. look, i take responsibility for every decision i make, but

that's not why i lost. >> tucker: it's possible it's easier to find public appearances by hillary clinton that don't involve blaming everyone in every place from manhattan to macedonia. we haven't found one yet. brit hume is a senior fox clinical analyst and he joins us tonight. nothing feels more empathetic to hillary clinton, brit, then appearances like this because this is someone who will make with no one in her life to pull her back and tell her how she's coming off to other people. >> tucker, she reminds me of other prominent people i've known who have made a terrible mistake, had a big failure. run into trouble. they have a very hard time, some of them, owning up to it and admitting they were involved in a colossal failure and they are to blame. when you think about her failure, her failure to win this particular election, she was up against donald trump, a man who who's favorable ratings were deep underwater throughout

virtually the entire campaign. the electoral college math appeared to favor her ongoing overwhelmingly. it didn't seem possible she could lose. and yet she did. that is a very, very hard thing to face up to. i think she is doing her best to find a way to look at this and the way to frame it that makes it appear that she wasn't really all the blame. otherwise, i don't know what she would do if she didn't have this crush she is developed, all sorts of other reasons. >> tucker: you've lived in a time. don't you think that when you accept blame us things, it's liberating, it will make you feel better when you do that. >> i agree with that. now again, i will get asked to make a graduation speech, my message is the same to young people. own your mistakes. admit them, first of all to yourself, than anybody else who might be involved. it is liberating.

the peculiar fact of it is the country contrary to how and my feel to you, it makes people feel better to you than less. i think in her case, the burden of this is so great. the burden of acknowledging that in the end, it was hard to win the election engine failed to do so against a candidate who looked like he could possibly win. i would also say, by the way, tucker, those most recent remarks, the ones she made yesterday. i don't think it's the case that america is not ready for female leadership and for a woman president. they were just -- the country turned out not to be ready for this woman to be president. remember, she turned out not to be as she refuses to admit a very effective candidate and she comes with tremendous baggage which she's always been hesitant to recognize as well, going back to her days in arkansas and right through her husband's presidency and beyond. >> tucker: america's pretty open minded, open-minded enough

to elect the right woman, i would say. brit, good to see you. big tech companies know everything about you, but they want to know more. we will see google's plans to spy on your children -- for real -- next. anniversary. anniversary. aw. sorry. we've got other plans. your recurring, unpredictable abdominal pain and diarrhea... ...may be irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. you've tried over-the-counter treatments and lifestyle changes, but ibs-d can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi,... ...a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage... ...both abdominal pain and diarrhea at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have no gallbladder, have pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a bowel or gallbladder blockage.

pancreatitis may occur and can lead to hospitalization and death. if you are taking viberzi,... ...you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi... ...include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d with viberzi.

you for four years. you named it brad. you loved brad. and then you totaled him. you two had been through everything together. two boyfriends, three jobs... you're like nothing can replace brad. then liberty mutual calls... and you break into your happy dance. if you sign up for better car replacement™, we'll pay for a car that's a model year newer with 15,000 fewer miles than your old one. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.

we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ ♪ >> tucker: we've been telling you months now for the growing power of the big tech companies whose brand surveillance capitalism has come to shape our politics and culture. in ways many people don't receive. let me give you a specific example of that, looking into the near future and a terrifying illustration of the control of these companies seek over our daily lives. we recently reviewed several patents filed by google. we describe them, ask yourself if you are comparable giving this much power to unelected technocrats who you've never met. in the first filed in december 2016, google envisions how it could send you personalized advertising based

on what a camera observes in your home. an illustration that google submitted to the federal government, the patent office, and camera in your bedroom sees a "godfather" novel on your bed and uses that to steer you to watching the movie. if you think that's creepy, prepare yourself. it gets a lot creepier. in another patent application in 2016, google imagines how it can take control of your parenting, the relationship to your children. google's smart home system can detect children in your liquor cabinet or in their parents bedroom. they quote, "when mr. witt is occurring deliver a verbal warning." a hypothetical child called benjamin, google's cameras would be watching benjamin at all times. using electronics, using information to sell things at some point because of the whole point, google. the same patent also discusses how the smart home could coach families on areas of

improvement. if a family does not spend enough time together, eating together, in google's estimation, google might school them and suggest they set a goal in eating more often together. that is google's description. not ours. we are assuming it was a person, not a robot, replied this way. "we filed patent applications on a variety of ideas our employees come up with. some of the mature into a product or. some don't." in other words, don't worry. we aren't spying on you, next to it we just have a patent on it. of course, tech is also dangerous because it's deeply addictive. more than anything, it's deeply addictive. a group of early google, facebook employees are teaming up to check the companies they helped create. john harris is a former google employee, heads of the new group, the center for humane technology. jim stier is the founder of common sense media which advocates for children. they join us tonight. thank you, both, for coming tonight. he described these products as

addictive. what do you mean by that? >> most people don't realize, they see addiction and they think it happens by accident. we are addicted to a lot of things. we were worried about our kids in the 1970s, we were addicted to gossiping on the telephone. what this misses, there are 100 engineers whose entire job, not because they are evil, they have to figure out how to get back to the products. snapshots want to put the number of days in a row, something called a streak, next to every single person in your kids contacts. they say, if you got 30 friends, here is the number days in a row you've sent a message to each friend. it keeps each of them hooked, because the business model must so long as it's advertising, how do i hold on to your attention. the entire talk stock price is linked one-to-one with how much attention i get. >> tucker: we know, jim, screen time has huge consequences. >> huge because once it is. >> tucker: it hurts children.

>> it can. >> tucker: there are disturbing metrics, some of them are linked to tech use. why has there been no public recognition? >> i run common sense media. it has taken time. part of it is we got so excited about the incredible technological innovations. we aren't anti-tech. we aren't anti-tech at all. common sense helps you find the good stuff. but there is clearly been no regulation whatsoever, and no real discussion. i think what's happening, you are a dad just like i am. i'm not sure i want this in my life all the time. i don't want this coming year. he just told you addiction is, but 60% of kids in the united states believe they are addicted to their cell phones. >> tucker: so you worked in here. are they aware -- they must be aware. the design must be addictive. do they have moral qualms about this?

>> in 2013, i created a presentation, the first google memo, saying we have a moral responsibility as google. because no matter what we do, we bump our elbows, a billion people's attention because that way, a billion people's attention because that way. how do you ethically steer 2 billion people, actually, their thoughts, when they look at a smartphone or if you'd? from the moment we wake up in the morning to 150 times we check per day, it's never been easier if it's been a kid. you see photo after photo with your friends not having fun with you. is that how we want to ethically care for all these millions and millions of kids? >> tucker: do you think, jim, there's enough people at these companies who can see clearly enough to pull back from this a little bit? >> this is the cigarette case all over again. we were just with a group of engineering colleagues saying enough is enough.

the key is the leadership at the top. i tell you this is a major challenge now to the people at the very top of the key tech companies at the united states. when values do you have? is about how much value you make, how much attention, the arms race of attention you could win so you can monetize it by selling ads? or is it for value? by the way, this is not a partisan issue, by the way. everybody all across the country. >> tucker: it's reckoning society. i couldn't be rooting for you guys more. godspeed. i hope you come back. >> thank you. >> good to see you, tucker. >> tucker: we got another exquisite report on google coming tomorrow. pretty shocking to make sickly. we will show you in detail how the company is tracking you without your knowledge. we tested it today. #metoo is coming to fast food. is it time for feminist chips? we will meet a feminist chip

eater next. claire could only imagine enjoying chocolate cake. now, she can have her cake and eat it too. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day, all-night protection. can you imagine 24 hours without heartburn? there's somethingdoing toyou may be missing. a key part of your wellness that you may be... overlooking. it's your eyes. that's why there's ocuvite, from bausch + lomb. as you age your eyes can lose vital nutrients. ocuvite helps replenish those nutrients. ocuvite has lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega-3. nourish your eyes to help them be their healthy best. ocuvite eye vitamins. be good to your eyes.

don't we need that cable box to watch tv? nope. don't we need to run? nope. it just explodes in a high pitched 'yeahhh.' yeahhh! try directv now for $10 a month for 3 months. no satellite needed.

>> tucker: we might not have separate bathrooms for men and women anymore, but we might have separate snack foods. in an interview, the ceo of pepsico suggested doritos could be more female friendly. the comments sparked a backlash on social media, as everything does, which forced pepsi to clarify today there are no plans for women specifically doritos. cathy areu, our spirit guide to the dark recesses of the left. kathy, great to see you tonight. i'm trying to parse, what the

setting of ladies prolific doritos? my only conclusion would be they suggest there is some inherent difference between men and women, which i think is illegal now? >> what's upsetting is they were saying that women are different than men in the way that they eat, that women would like to crunch, they would like to lick their fingers when the e doritos but they don't because women don't feel culpable in society doing these things. for doritos to even think that way, to think we do not they want to silent us, that's completely wrong. they are trying to silence women do not let us crunch in public. >> tucker: keep the crunch. vulgarity and rudeness are feminist victories. if a woman took her cheetah pace and rubbed it through her hair and belched at the table, those would be feminist victories, right? >> a feminist victory would women being allowed to do what men do with their doritos. if men are licking their fingers, women should be allowed to do so as well. the ceo was saying that women

don't do those things. don't feel comfortable doing those things but wants to do those things. to allow them to enjoy the doritos, they were going to create lady friend the doritos. >> tucker: you think, it's a good thing, as a victory for the feminist ideal one women are as repulsive as men are. would you dip tobacco ever? if a man does this, i'm doing it? >> why do you get to be gross and we don't get to be gross? it's a victory when women get to be equal to men anyway. in the 1700s, women couldn't walk in the grass because it was seen as dirty, but men could walk in the grass. it's the same concept. why do we have to be so prim and clean question makes me when i'm not imposing my values on anyone, i'm wondering where these rules come from. >> men. >> tucker: a lot of these rules are actually formulated and enforced by women for just a guess having lived here for 48

years. do you think there's any truth and that? >> man's running thing. even the women are the majority, men are the majority, when are the mariner e >> tucker: what if women are the majority, which they are, what they change the calculation. >> unfortunately, they are still making 77 sense -- the one you mean the statistic that's totally >> tucker: do female specific products always bother you? does it bother you that bras are for sale? is that a slap to women question mike eye shadow? >> products that women need -- no, there's nothing wrong with those products where there's no need to make a chip that lets us dirty or fingers. but man buy eye shadow.

in 2018, men are buying the same products that women are buying. >> tucker: does it bother you that women's razors are pink? >> women's razors can be blue as well. >> tucker: okay. last question. when you are having dinner out with friends, whatever, nondetermined gender, doesn't matter. do you ever think yourself, i'm going to be disgusting. i'm going to eat with my hands. i'm going to drink the soup from the bowl. just as a way to express your liberation as a woman? >> tucker: you can do that's vehicle you can do that and get away with it. women, we are not there yet. we aren't allowed to be -- >> tucker: you ever pulled your pizza like -- if you are eating a big mac and fewer than three bytes? >> if i want to be equal and we treated equally, i will start to do that. >> tucker: you're a feminist, cathy areu! i love that about you. canadian foreign minister justin

trudeau did some mansplaining about sexism to a woman! it's getting weird in canada! that next. . .

♪ ♪ there are two types of people in the world. those who fear the future... and those who embrace it. the future is for the unafraid. ♪ ♪

on the only bed that adjusts on both sides to your ideal comfort, your sleep number setting. and snoring? does your bed do that? right now during the ultimate sleep number event, save 50% on the ultimate limited edition bed with adjustable comfort on both sides.

ends soon. visit sleepnumber.com for a store near you. so we sent that sample i doff to ancestry. i was from ethnically. my ancestry dna results are that i am 26% nigerian. i am just trying to learn as much as i can about my culture. i put the gele on my head and i looked into the mirror and i was trying not to cry. because it's a hat, but it's like the most important hat i've ever owned. discover the story only your dna can tell. order your kit now at ancestrydna.com. and when you switch to esurance, in the modern world, it pays to switch things up. you can save time, worry, hassle, and yup, money. in fact,

drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved hundreds. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance. an allstate company. click or call. >> tucker: well, today, prime minister justin trudeau isn't just a case of nepotism gone wild though, of course he is. before using his father's name to take power i was a drama teach and can't resist the urge to lecture people. during a town hall he interrupted a woman and corrected her for using a sinister sexist word mankind. >> maternal love is the love that's going to change the future of mankind. >> we like to say peoplekind not necessarily mankind. it's more inexclusive. >> there we go. exactly. [cheers and applause] >> yes, thank you. >> we can all learn from each other. >> tucker: we can all win from each other. he can't win in the modern world he helped create. denounced him for man splaining. evolution eats itself.

the show that's the enem sworn enemy of lying smugness and group think. good night from washington. sean hannity is next. hey, sean. >> tucker, thank you. in my hands tonight vindication breaking right now at this hour blockbuster developments. key parts of the second memo from senator chuck grassley and senator lindsey graham right now right here have been unredacted. the information is beyond stunning it offers more evidence more proof that the fbi lied to the first fisa court to get the warrant to spy on the trump campaign and it was the bulk, the biggest part of their application. now, we are going through this all very slowly tonight. that's our breaking news opening monologue. in my hands brand new at this hour bombshell revelations from the grassley memo. major parts fro