we would love to have you on your talked about it, you're always welcome in "fox news @ night." most-watched, most grateful you spent the evening with us, for "fox news @ night," i'm shannon bream. ♪ >> good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight, professional reality show contestant and former white house aide omarosa manigault this back in the news, this time as a pundit. here is her latest critique of vice president mike pence, watch. >> as bad as you think trump is, you would bebo worried about pe pence. it's scary. and just a moment, piers morgan joins us with a reaction to that. they competed on the celebrity years ago. he says it she offered him to win and attacked him and his t

family when he turned it down. if not the strangest thing that happened in washington right now. tonight we have more on the ongoing saga of the trump dossier. senators chuck grassley and lindsey graham launched a probe into national security advisor susan rice. in the very final minutes of the obama administration just afternoon on inauguration day on 2017 come out rice sent herself an email on the white house computer system. in it she described a meeting she attended two weeks before. atic that meeting were president obama, vice president joe biden, fbi director jim comey, deputy ag sally yates and susan rice herself. according to rice in this email, obama instructed the officials in the room to consider withholding national intelligence from the incoming trump administration in case they were compromised by russia. in other words, almost two months after the presidential

election, barack obama viewed trump not as is democratically elected successor but as a traitor and a russianan spy. obama viewed himself as someone who had the right to withhold government documents from an elected president. it's not the behavior of someone who believes in democracy. that meeting set the tone for that year and all subsequent arguments since. democrats have treated trump and his election as illegitimate everth since then and at the het of their case against trump and this administration is the steel dossier. it's the only publicly available document that details alleged collusion with russia. we talked a lot about the dossier on this program but relatively little about what is in it. what does it claim? is in the event true? after more than a year of probing by politicians and intelligence agencies and a journalist, here is the sum total of what we actually know about the document that started all of this. we know it was compiled by

christopher steele acting as a contractor of fusion gps with funds supplied by the hillary clinton campaign and the dnc. it was a form of opposition research designed to be used against trump in the presidential campaign. it was not an intelligence document,, it was op po. it claims that russian intelligence cultivated donald trump as a kind of asset, a one-man sleeper cell for more than five years. you could say there's no evidence of that. the dossier also claims the kremlincl fed the trump team inl reports on hillary clinton for years, there's no proof of that either. if it says he was favored by lucrative russian real estate deals as part of his cultivation, that sleeper cell, no proof therehe either. according to the dossier, they were exchanging intelligence

with each other for at least eight years. the dossier goes on to describe a clandestine meeting in prague between trump's lawyer michael: supposedly that took place in august of 2016. this is one of very few claims in the dossier that has been conclusively checked and it's false.e he wasn't even outside of the u.s. at the time the meeting took place. in sum, the steele dossier is absurd. the closer you read it, the more absurd itur is. as you read it, ask yourself who would believe something like this? is so transparently partisan and unlikely and a stupid and flimsy and reads like a parody of a badly writtene spy novel, at the same time he was firing people on the apprentice, he was working with vladimir putin to subvert t america? it's hard to say it with a straight face, it's that stupid. keep in mind this is a document to the fbi used to justify spying on american citizens.

these are the claims thates democrats in congress repeatedly cited as the reason t to stop te normal functioning of government in order to investigate the administration. this is the famous dossier that even today progressives in the media are spending millions in an attempt to corroborate and it's all a stupid joke. amazingly a lot of people in power fell for it. congressman ron desantis is a republican rep resetting the state of florida, thanks for coming on. the meeting that susan rice describes in her email between the president and the vice president is really .evealing trump was accused of considering obama foreign but obama turned out did consider trump foreign a foreign agent. can a sitting president deny government documents, intelligence to an incoming president? >> i don't see how you can do that. think about what gates was onto at the time, that was one of the reasons why she sent the fbi

agents to phlegm, creating some type of bogeyman out of acting like an incoming national security advisor. >> tucker: a president's authority and legitimacy comes from voters -- how can one president tsai i don't think the next guy should have this, i don't think he is worthy of this information. doi think it's improper to that, this january 5th meeting -- what did he do it the very next day. he wentim to trump tower, he showed them the dossier, that got leaked to cnn. also during this whole transition time, you had an unprecedented campaign of leaking classified information designed to put a cloud over the incoming presidency. i think susan rice has a lot of questions she is going to have to answer. why would you would you all of a sudden right as you're leaving

the white house to that email saying obama said do it by the a book. it's an odd thing to do, she was trying to create a record. why did she feel the need to do that? it was clear, by the time trump got inaugurated, you had the permanent bureaucracy and the holdovers, they were feeding information on a daily basis. the first two or three months of his administration was constant bombshell reports all based on anonymousny sources. all based on former or current u.s. officials. e that started from the day he got elected all the way to theel appointment of robert mueller as special counsel. >> tucker: the dossier itself which was the center of all of this claims that trump was cultivated by russia intelligence for five years prior to becoming president. is there evidence that'sde true? >> think about what they used for carter page. the idea that russian oil

companies with were going to give him a 10% stake or 20% stake in a company that is so have beenwould $10 billion that they were going to give to carter page and the fbi used that to get t surveillance. the only thing that has definitely been corroborated is carter page did travel to russia during the campaign. none of the other key facts have been corroborated at all. >> sean: am i overstating it when i say as a normal person reading the dossier seems absurd. you would have to be a moron to take it at face value it, is your reaction? >> i think it's spectacular, i think it's something that comey is right about. salacious but unverified. >> tucker: and richard goodstein aned attorney, he has advised both of hillary clinton's campaigns, joins usat tonight.

this dossier is at the center of everything, it comes from both speed, they now have apparently hired a former fbi official and others to travel the globe and try to corroborate it so without success. those fetus at the center of this -- o they use this document to justify spying on an american citizen. i'm wondering, where there are other documents? 31 slightly weird things all girls do in the bathroom but don't talk about, was that in anyta way part of this investigation? >> anything else you want to talk about that's relevant? this will assist twisted, the fbi shielded donald trump because they briefed the v president of vice president about in the susan rice memo about the fact that russians had interfered and they went outside their rules to go after hillary clinton. can we at least have that is a

premise? > the premises this. allegations were made against the trump campaign, very atspecific ones that they collud with the russian government to win the election. and moreover the president had been a long time russian agent. those are very serious allegations, he considered withholding intelligence from the incomingpr president. if you make allegations like that you have any obligation to prove them? >> let's put aside this whole five year business. what we know is michael flynn was a foreign agent. >> tucker: of russia? >> of turkey, we know that. he didn't disclose what he was being paid by russia or turkey, we know that. we know because of the wiretaps that he asked kinsley act go easy, were going to not proceed with the sanctions. we just saw that in the past two

weeks. >> tucker: am i misremembering this, did he campaign on that, i think he campaigned on that in public, is that a policy position you could be against sanctions against russia sim and not be a russian agent? >> i think any official would be derelict if they knew the national security advisor come again could be compromised, he had lied about the fact that he was not a foreign agent and guess what, just like rob porter wasn't subject to blackmail, so was michael flynn. you're putting this as trump, what the president was saying in the susan rice memo is we have a guy who is going to be sitting steps from the oval office who is a foreign agent. we know he has got these ties to russia. we can't trust that he won't approach that is more secretive than sanctions. >> tucker: are you allowed to have a different view on

sanctions and the one barack obama had or is it criminal? doou you realize you were going insane on tv right now? you are saying things that not only legal but totally legitimate. you're acting as if they are moral. >> what's insane is that it is normal you would have as a national security issue a foreign agent, that's what we had. >> tucker: actually we didn't at that point, as i've said 100 times on this show it was wrong of mike flynn to take money from the government of turkey. when he showed up to work at the white house he was not a foreign agent atat that point. a lot of people in washington, he took money from a foreign government to change american policy, i think it's wrong. it happens every day. our policies are driven from that fact. >> in the white house, he used his authority to push policies that are going to benefit turke turkey. he told susan rice don't go into

rocca, it's adverse to turkish interests. you talk about traders, that's a traitor. >> tucker: traitor is in, we are coining a new word. let me ask you this, none of that gets to the point -- you're saying he had taken money from the turkish money, that's wrong, i agree with you on that. none of this hasas anything to o with the core claim which is wrecked our government for over a year. at a certain point you feel like you are responsible for this insanity which is in destroying the concept of due process making it possible for anyone to think clearly. >> let me make four points and ten seconds. the russians said to the trump people, we can help you. donald trump jr., love it, bring it on. if the russians did it with wikipedia and a trump use at 100 times in the campaign trail encouraging the russians to steal from hillary clinton. that is a problem. >> tucker: does it bother you

that the hillary clinton campaign paid through a foreign intelligence agent russian sources to gather russian government information to use against their opponents donald trump, i'm not sure what it's so different. >> the russians stole and what hillary clinton did was get information that was a matter of public record. >> tucker: it's a matter of public record that truck was working for the russian government? >> we will see what's fact and what's not. we can laugh. >> tucker: i may have to leave the country, if all this is true, that nothing i believed in the nothing that seem real is. piers morgan made a stunning claim that theor former white house aide on semi professional television figure omarosa offered him and return for helping her win

"celebrity apprentice," that's not the only crazy thing she is up to. she will join us next to confirm or deny. >> tucker carlson's brush to my pacific life, protecting generations of families for 150 years, that's the power of pacific. you can't always predict them, but you can game plan for them. for 150 years, generations of families have chosen pacific life for retirement and life insurance solutions to help them reach their goals. being ready for wherever life leads. that's the power of pacific. ask a financial advisor about pacific life.

♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: longtime reality star omarosa manigault old who worked at theey white house at r americans who want the president impeached, be careful what you wish for. in an appearance on another n reality show which happened last night, she blasted the vice president as a religious extremist, watch. >> as bad as you think trump is,

you would be worried about pence. we would be begging for trump back if pence became president. he is extreme, i'm christian, i love jesus. but he thinks jesus tells him to say things. it's scary. >> tucker: meanwhile over on "the view," the hosts characterize the vice president's faith as mental illness. >> i'm catholic, i'm a faithful person, i don't know all if i want my vice presidents speaking in tongues. >> it's one thing to talk to jesus,s it's another thing when jesus talks to you. that's mental illness if i'm not correct. >> editor at large at

dailymail.com he joins us. what do you make of this? both of the latest incarnation as a political pundit and of the dismissal of religion is mental illness. >> i find it absolutely ridiculous that we are at havio discuss omarosa and a political context, shen was allowed to hae an office in the west wing of the white house for nearly a year. i don't know why donald trump would have ever let her in there, she's already behaving exactly how she i would've pred she would c behave, she was goig to. she's omarosa, she's a reality television star who was a poisonous viper who is spreading innuendo and terrorizing everyone in her wake. first question, what was she doing there? >> tucker: it for all the time

spent on the russia's story, omarosa worked in the white house, really? democrats didn't notice, she seems normal to them. > we have all this stuff about rob porter which is a very serious matter and it's quite clear that he shouldn't have been there either given what we now know about him. there are questions to the administration about who knew what, where and when. if we are going to apply that logic and judgment to him, where was that logic and judgment about omarosa. who was the president surrounding himself with? i met donald trump when i took part in "celebrity apprentice" with omarosa, he's got to have better people around him in the white house the types of people we see with rob porter. >> tucker: i think she probably is in her own category,

i've been over there a few times it's not chock-full of omarosas but she did work there. she became famous for being horrible. you worked with her on the apprentice, what's she like? >> she is absolutely appalling, one of the worst human beings i have ever encountered in mync l life. i have encountered a lot of bad people. she has no saving grace, she was vicious, conniving, scheming, plotting, treacherous. her first gambit to make him day one, first challenge. she sidles up to me, we should have a show manse. i said what's a showmance? everyone has sex together, we could sell it and make lots of money. weeds go away. she said what's the matter with you, are you? just because i don't want to

have sex with you on this show doesn't make me gay. i'm a victim of omarosa. she gave me four or five weeks unrelenting 5 barrels of abuse, tirades, vicious nasty stuff. i couldn't believe it. she gotten beaten in the show, i ended up winning it. if that stuck in her mind as well, cut forward to the campaign in the middle of 2016. i suddenly read she's going to be working for donald trump the candidate, how can that make any sense. then i hear one he wins, she's going to be in the white house.i i have a lot of respect for donald trump, i'm afraid with her it makes no sense at the time, now she has left, she is apparently achieved absolutely nothing in herse time in the white house other than disrupting everybody. you can bet your life she was there listening, plotting,

scheming, we're not going to have celebrity big brother and all the stuff on that. then the lifetime movie at which point you went i are going to have to leave the country because it is so ridiculously absurd. is one of thet most vivid descriptions of anyone i've ever heard. i suppose you are not texting each other. >> we have not stayed in touch. i did bump into her at a wwe wrestling event. the nausea i felt on the exact moment she made that proposition to me all came flooding back. i literally had to run to the restroom and regurgitate exactly what i had done all those years befored. she is beyond any reproach. she is a professional edge tour of epicas proportions, the least trustworthy human being ever conceived on god's earth. for her to be laying in on mike penceel about religion when

in religion somehow created this monster is beyond any sense of realism you could ever wish to have britt >> tucker: what a life you lead, running into omarosa at wwe -- come back any time it's great to see you. democrats are pretending anymore,e, dick durbin just said it we need to import more peasants so employers can save on wagers. it's true, in its detail, next so graceful. the corkscrew spin, flawless... ...his signature move, the flying dutchman. poetry in motion. and there it is, the "baby bird". breathtaking. a sumo wrestler figure skating? surprising. what's not surprising? how much money heather saved by switching to geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. stay at la quinta. where we're changing with stylish make-overs.

then at your next meeting, set your seat height to its maximum level. bravo, tall meeting man. start winning today. book now at lq.com

it can power your apps with public services without starting from scratch.

it brings your business up to speed, doing more with systems you have in place. it can bring all your apps to life and run them within your data center. it is... the new ibm cloud private. the cloud that's designed for your data. ai ready. secure to the core. the ibm cloud is the cloud for smarter business. we are the tv doctors of america, and we may not know much about medicine, but we know a lot about drama. from scandalous romance, to ridiculous plot twists. (gasping) son? dad! we also know you can avoid drama by getting an annual check-up. so we're partnering with cigna to remind you to go see a real doctor. go, know, and take control of your health. it could save your life. doctor poses! dad! cigna. together, all the way.

>> tucker: democratic senator dick durbin of illinois was surprisingly forth right this week about >> tucker: democratic senator dick durbin of illinois was surprisingly forthright this week about why we need to mass tomm united states. immigrants provided the low-paying serf labor that american labor so desperately want, watch. >> the next time you go into a nice restaurant in chicago, look at who cleaned the dishes off the table and when the door swings, look at who is in the kitchen doing the dishes. by and large it's going to be immigrants were doing thosemi things. not many of us say to our sons and daughters i'm hoping the day will come when you decide to go and pick fruit for a living. you hardly ever hear that because we know it's hard to back breaking work and immigrants to the work. many jobs they feel are jobs that americans aren't jumping to fail. >> tucker: fruit is picked by machines, but whatever. brian, thanks for coming on.

it's so striking for someone as old as i am to see a democrat to make case.ca there are millions of americans who can't get by, have the country can't get $400 in a days notice, they don't have any money.wh what they need are higher-paying jobs. here you have a democratic senator saying no, the point is making sure that employers can pay as little as possible, we need to import aa lot of people from third world countries who work for less. how does that help americans? and why is it the emphasis on raising their wages? >> i think what i would suggest senator durbin was leaving out, twice as many citizens start businesses, they come over, they try to bring their families to start a family. join families of faith and many are working in our fields and our agricultural industry would

not survive if it were not for three quarters of immigrants working in that industry just like in many cities. >> tucker:ti i don't know if your facts have caught up to current reality which is agriculture is increasingly mechanized. it takes far fewer people. overwhelmingly mechanized. what's the single most common job for daca recipients, working in restaurants. you're talking about low-wage i'm a low skilled jobs and you're talking about people who are less educated than average native born americans, only 5% of daca recipients have college degrees. that's exactly the group of jobs that are going away because of automation.. it has been a lot of study on this, it's weird to me that he would import millions of people to do jobs that are disappearing, why would you do that? >> the more immigrants that come here, the more jobs are created. the rhetoric is good, i am here in kentucky, we are a poor stat

state. i worked on a farm when i was growingen up. i know what kind of backbreaking labor that is. the truth of the matter is, what we are talking about here is been the backbone of our entire country since the beginning. it's always been family-based migration. >> tucker: i realize that you are a minister and you are making a kind of moral argument, i'm making an economic argument. do you know what supply and demand is? it's the never changing rule that if you have an overabundance of something its value falls. if you bring in a million new laborers every year what happens to wages at the low end? they go down. >> all of the data is suggesting on the hole, wages go up on that economic argument. >> tucker: is an economic

matter, how did we suspend the law of supply and demand when it comes tomi immigration it applis to everything else in life. send us cheap because there's a lot of it but that's not true forau immigrant labor because of why? >> the more human beings are in a place, the more they can buy your products, the more human beings grading business, the more business and entrepreneurship you have, that's been theas trick for allf american history, that has made our economy so vibrant. >> tucker: i don't think you have the facts on your side but as a theoretical matter but if low wage labor makes you rich, why isn't mexico richer than the united states? >> first of all i can you can go to define american.com/facts matter and you can see -- >> tucker: if importing poor people makeses you rich why hast it worked for the rest of the

world? >> why is the america that was good enough for my great grandfather who didn't have the marriage that you're talking about, why is that no longer the america that's good enough for -- >> tucker: i would say you know nothing about my great grandfather, and i would say because the economy hason chang, it's 2018. we are in a postindustrial part of the economy. it's a lot easier b to get here whatever it wasn't mckenzie just estimated by 2030 we are going to lose 73 million jobs, you see not concerned by that. i bet you if i looked at your donors they would be big businesses who want cheap labor. you are knowing facts that are relevant to modern america. >> i'm supporting those facts. we ought to be concerned with the mechanization of labor. immigrants are not creating that.lo you look at all the businesses that have been created by immigrants in silicon valley that would not be here literally if the current plan on the table of the senate is looking at in the trump administration is

proposing were to be passed. >> tucker: i'm not here to defend the congress or trump, i want to defend the country and say why wouldn't we lament all future immigration to immigrants with the same profile of the people who started those businesses in silicon valley. >> that's not what the current plan suggests. >> tucker: if you have degree in engineering you can come here. if youou have a high school education, you can't, would that work?id >> do you have an engineering degree at a graduate level. >> tucker: i was born here, i don't have to justify --ho we gt to decide whether they come or not. why wouldn't we get people who are more impressive? why would we bring people who got fifth grade educations? >> in our most prominent harbor, it reads give us your tired, poor, huddled masses. >> tucker: you don't have an

economic argument but you're going to use a moral blackmail based on a hundred-year-old program by a socialist. a los angeles judge handed a big win and a big setback to the rest of the country, will give you the details next. (female vo) breaking news from washington as lawmakers;

(male vo) raging wildfires continue to scorch parts; (male vo) allegations of misconduct; ♪ oh, why you look so sad, ♪ the tears are in your eyes, mvo: how hard is it just to take some time out of your day to give him a ride to school and show him you support him. ♪ and don't be ashamed to cry, ♪ let me see you through, ♪ 'cause i've seen the dark side too. ♪ ♪ when the night falls on you, ♪ you don't know what to do, mvo: when disaster strikes to one, we all get together and support each other. that's the nature of humanity. ♪ i'll stand by you,

♪ won't let nobody hurt you. ♪ i'll stand by you, ♪ so if you're mad, get mad, ♪ don't hold it all inside, ♪ come on and talk to me now. ♪ hey, what you got to hide? ♪ mvo: it's a calling to the nation of how great we are and how great we can be. ♪ i'm alive like you. ♪ when you're standing at the cross roads, ♪ ♪ and don't know which path to choose, ♪ ♪ let me come along, ♪ 'cause even if you're wrong ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ i'll stand by you.

♪ won't let nobody hurt you. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ even in your darkest hour, ♪ and i will never desert you. ♪ i'll stand by you. you may be at increased risk for pneumococcal pneumonia, that can take you out of the game for weeks, even if you're healthy. pneumococcal pneumonia is a potentially serious bacterial lung disease that in severe cases can lead to hospitalization. it may hit quickly, without warning, causing you to miss out on the things you enjoy most. prevnar 13® is not a treatment for pneumococcal pneumonia... it's a vaccine you can get to help protect against it. prevnar 13® is approved for adults to help prevent infections from 13 strains of the bacteria that cause pneumococcal pneumonia. you should not receive prevnar 13® if you have had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients. if you have a weakened immune system, you may have a lower response to the vaccine.

the most common side effects were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, limited arm movement, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, less appetite, vomiting, fever, chills, and rash. help protect yourself against pneumococcal pneumonia. ask your doctor or pharmacist about prevnar 13®. ♪ >> tucker: a federal judge has issued a ruling suggesting that a core part of isis immigration enforcement is unconstitutional. u.s. district judge who of an obama appointee said the l.a. county sheriff's department violated the rights of immigrants instead of granting the bail, they are entitled to monetary damages financed by taxpayers, thanks for coming on.

you have a left-wing federal judge who has declared that illegal immigrants once they sneak in have a right to be unmolested by federal legal authorities and if americans try to do something about it, they are theri criminals. >> the characterization you make is incorrect. these are not people who snuck in, the majority of these people are individuals who were here ow a work visa that had expired. some of them were u.s. citizens were just born in a foreign country. what happened here, it's a practice that has been going on for many years now in different parts of the country. in this situation it was a los angeles sheriff's department which i was surprised by. typically you see this and more obscure places. >> tucker:r: let me be clear about something. the american citizens born in other countries, that's a mistake. that's not germane to the policy or germane to the debates. they were accidentally picked up and they shouldn't have been. >>at they were plaintiffs who sd

and actually one. >> tucker: what is true is the judge's order pertains to people who are here illegally. it doesn't matter how you got here, the question is -- >> one person was a u.s. citizen. >> tucker: u.s. citizens have a right to live here by definition. >> what was illegal, if i coulde state this, was how los angeles sheriff's county department was operating. they were getting retainer requests, it's a request but not a requirement for them to act in accordance with. it's voluntary ony their part, they are not required to act on this. they were rounding up and picking up people simply on these requests which did not have any probable cause. that's what the judge found. there was no probable cause for these requests.

>> tucker: do we have a right to tell people who are not here legally to leave and to make themle leave? >> what you you need to walk ay with is undocumented immigrants have legal rights. what was happening here is completely illegal. >> tucker: what are our rights as americans, do we have a right to tell people who are not here illegally to leave? >> i'm glad you brought this point up it's very pointed. we have a right to make sure that our tax dollars are not being directed toward chasing people who are here and matters who are to be dealt with. these are not crimes. being here because you overstate a visa is not a crime, it is a civil offense. to be dealt with in the immigration courts. >> tucker: you can try to out shout me, but i would like to get a clear answer on this. does the country have a right to

determine who from other countries gets to stay here and to say you are not allowed to be here, you didn't go through the process the congress designed. and now you have to leave. what you're saying is we don't have that right. >> i'm not saying that. l >> tucker: you've devoted time to stripping us of that right. >> i'm not an immigration attorney, i do not devote any time to what you are stating. the court found is that these are matters that have to be resolved. this is important, this is the core question. does the country have a right to tell people who are here illegally to leave? you are saying no. the entire left is sayingin no. i'm not saying no, neither is the left. we have laws that provide protections. if you want to deport someone you don't go to a criminal court you go to immigration court.

jurisdiction. >> tucker: tell that to the attorney general and california. >> in the immigration courts it has been established, we as taxpayers pay for. when i take money out of your paycheck. >> that goes to the legal defense of illegalsan who worrid we are being mean to. we spend more time think about the rights of an american citizen. >> i'm an american citizen and i think about my rights. we protect those who have constitutional rights. >> tucker: a princeton professor has been forced cancel his class on that free speech after his students couldn't handle speech. at that story with brit hume next 'sup, world? it's the box with 30% savings for safe drivers.

coming at you with my brand-new vlog. just making some ice in my freezer here. so check back for that follow-up vid. this is my cashew guy bruno. holler at 'em, brun. kicking it live and direct here at the fountain. should i go habanero or maui onion? should i buy a chinchilla? comment below. did i mention i save people $620 for switching? chinchilla update -- got that chinchilla after all. say what up, rocco. ♪

♪ >> tucker: a professor at princeton has just discovered the limits of >> tucker: professor at princeton has just discovered the limits of academic freedom, the fragile feelings of student students. the professor called lawrence rosen asked students whether it was worse for a white man to physically attack a black man or use a racial slur. students didn't react well, at least one got white in his face and screamed to the f word, he has now canceled his class. senior political analyst brit hume went to i college when it was different, he joins us .ow >> don't ask me how long it's been. >> tucker: i want. what i thought was striking about this was this class was about speech, what speech was offensive, it was an anthropology class. how odd is it that princeton

students couldn't handle it? >> we are talking about the n-word which is one of the ugliest words in the language and we don't go around using it for that reason and it'ss offensive. however, i would cement there is a difference between using the word in mentioning the word. there is a difference between usingng the word, calling someoe that and speaking with others and saying that they are that and mentioning and discussing the word. a class devoted to this very subject of language and what's offensive and what is not, you want to be able to mention the word and in so doing say the word. the professor wasn't calling anybody by that name, he was simply discussing the word itself. that's a distinction that has been lost in this wave of political correctness in which somethings are are unsalable. to me it makes no sense.

>> >> tucker: like most people i hate that word and i don't want to hear it. i would think of princeton students want to be rational enough, we are having that discussion of speech and of violence and this is a horrible thing to say, but here it is that they would be able to track with that. they don't seem like they were. >> i think one of the problems here is america is a passionate country and we want to be sensitive for other people's feelings. if you're a victim in any of these areas, it's kind of a good deal. you get a lot of consideration, you get a lot of sympathy. it seems to me it we have reached a stage in america wereo half people going around and applying victim status. we can yell f-bombs at college professors.

i sense it is utterly regrettable if you see the sensitivity going on all the time. this is what we mean when we talk about snowflakes. our colleague guy benson ran into resistance up at brown university. where people said it was offensive and wrong for him to be able to speak there. this is all part of the same phenomenon, it is very widespread, very disturbing. it has been widely reported on and i think most people in america disapprove of this. the responsibility falls upon the university administrators and the faculty which put up with this and have it for long time. >> tucker: to guide benson, in a 20 seconds we said, would you be worried about sending that child to college? >> i have an 18-year-old granddaughter who was at college, i am pleased to say there hasn't been many reports

of this kind of stuff going on. i am concerned about it and i have another granddaughter coming along in a couple of years who will be headed off to college and i hope she will choose a college. was not i hope by that time that attitudes about this will change and college administrators will begin to grow some backbone. >> tucker: thank you very much much. cnn it is ubiquitous in airports, why is america's least impressive cable channel dominating the least pleasant locations. i looked into that question, we have findings for you next. your sleep number setting. does your bed do that? right now, save 50% on the ultimate limited edition bed. ends soon. visit sleepnumber.com fora store near you.

we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪

when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night. hold on dad... liberty did what? yeah, liberty mutual 24-hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. my dad says our insurance doesn't have that. don't worry - i know what a lug wrench is, dad. is this a lug wrench? maybe? you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. >> tucker: well, if you have ever been to an american airport, you may have noticed something. everyone is watching cnn. they tonight have a choice. that may have made choice 20 se0

years ago. these days the channel has strayed so far to the left and wacky left conspiracy superiors and strange advice from chris cuomo, have you got to wonder what's going on. airports are like an lesser version of hell food and propaganda posing as food on cnn. why is this network, this channel in every airport in america? we decided to find out. and surprising large number of cases the reason is that cnn is literally paying to have you watch them. cnn has a special package called cnn airport it combines news, sports, and travel in at least 60 airports cnn has signed agreements t >> in at least 60 airports, in miami, for example, cnn airport pays the airport authority a minimum of 150 grande year. in minneapolis, the airport authorities there told us c nchl n pays for the cost of the infrastructure, ask pays for the opportunity to be in our facility. which raises the question, how much would you have to be paid

to watch cnn? if the answer is no amount would be enough? we don't blame you. unfortunately at the airport, you don't have a choice. but if given a choice, people don't watch. good night. over to sean hannity in new york city >> was that a rhetorical question? you can't pay me to watch cnn? >> hannity: we have a ton of new breaking information for you tonight. according to a new bombshell report, the house intelligence committee is honing in on former obama intelligence officials, brenner and clapper on how they may have polticize and weaponized this phoney fake news dossier to go after donald trump. there are also questions about john brennan. did he commit perjury over comments he made under oath about whether he knew that hilary clinton had funded that dossier filled with russian lies. also, breaking, senators grassly and graham are demanding answers about a mysterious email that suzanne rice sent to herself on president trump's