if the answer is no amount would be enough? we don't blame you. unfortunately at the airport, you don't have a choice. but if given a choice, people don't watch. good night. over to sean hannity in new york city >> was that a rhetorical question? you can't pay me to watch cnn? >> hannity: we have a ton of new breaking information for you tonight. according to a new bombshell report, the house intelligence committee is honing in on former obama intelligence officials, brenner and clapper on how they may have polticize and weaponized this phoney fake news dossier to go after donald trump. there are also questions about john brennan. did he commit perjury over comments he made under oath about whether he knew that hilary clinton had funded that dossier filled with russian lies. also, breaking, senators grassly and graham are demanding answers about a mysterious email that suzanne rice sent to herself on president trump's inauguration day about an important meeting

president obama had with f.b.i. director james comby a number of days earlier. and james comey told lawmakers he didn't think lieutenant general michael flinn, in fact, lied to the f.b.i. we'll also get to a big hearing on capitol hill with intelligence officials, and that's all coming up in our breaking news opening monologue. we start with a stunning piece of investigative reporting from paul sperry, now we've told you the two republican memos about severe fisa abuses, and we've give en you the details and the spying on the trump campaign. we've told you this is just the beginning of what is coming. tonight there is a new development in this massive scandal. now according to sperry, the house intelligence committee is focusing on several key, former, obama intelligence officials which include john brennan and james clapper and their connections to the steal dossier that was filled with hilary clinton bought and paid for russian lies. let's start with the former cia

director john brennan. now according to paul sperry's new reporting, the house intelligence committee is investigating whether or not brennan committed personally while testifying under oath about the dossier. back in may of 2017, pay close attention. >> director brennan, do you know who commissioned the steele dossier? >> i don't. >> do you know if the bure rowe ever relied on the steele dossier as part of any court filings, applications, petitions, pleadings? >> i have no awareness. >> did the cia rely on it? >> no. >> why not? >> because we didn't. it wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. it was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. it was not >> hannity: so we're to believe

john brennan the former head of the cia claiming under oath he had no idea hilary clinton and the dnc paid over $12 million to finance the salacious, unverified dossier that used russian government sources? that was in may of 2017. we now know from the gop memos 17 months earlier in october of 2016, the f.b.i. and doj were using that dossier as the bulk of the fisa application to get the warrant to spy on carter paige. now we've also discovered the f.b.i. and doj lied to the fisa court judge. they never said, never told the judge, although they knew it, that clinton paid for the dossier. instead they thought they were clever. they put a footnote in the application about the dossier perhaps having some political affiliation. so brennan was either the most uninformed cia director in the history of the country or was he lying to congress? now that's the start of brennan's problem is. now paul sperry is also

discovering how brennan pushed this information about this dossier to the f.b.i. and democratic leaders. now a congressional source telling sperry john brennan did more than anyone to promulgate the dirty dossier. he polticize and effectively weaponized what was false intelligence against donald trump. and paul sperry gives further details about brennan's efforts to damage the trump campaign with the phoney dossier. and according to numerous reports on august 25th, 2016, brennan briefed the former senate minority leader harry reid about what he said was russia trying to help trump win the election. two days later, senator reed fires off a letter to james comey to investigate the trump campaign for cluing with the russians. now reed wrote, in part, the evidence of the connection between the russian government and donald trump's campaign continues to mount. and reid goes on to specifically mention an allegation from the phoney dossier about a trump campaign associate going to

moscow in july of 2016. we know who that person was. that was carter paige. the how would then senator reid have known that? did brennan a couple of days earlier brief reid about the fake news document put together by christopher steele that was paid for by hilary clinton? now reid pubcly encouraged the f.b.i. to investigate the campaign. now that called, the way i look at it, trying to influence an election. but that wasn't reid's only attempt to do so. the former senator put out a second letter to comey before the election in october of 2016 and he writes this, in my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between donald trump and his top advisors and the russian government. okay. who are the top officials harry reid's talking about? was it brennan? we know from reports that reid was briefed by the former cia

director, and that was before the election. now as for after the election, paul sperry is reporting that brennan had information from the steele dossier, included in the president's daily intelligence briefing. now those details were then leaked to the press and cnn, the washington post, new york times, they all reported on it. months later when testifying, brennan then said that details from the dossier weren't good enough to include in the january 2017 intelligence community report about russian election interference. okay. they used it in october to get the fisa warrant. so despite all these facts, all this information, brennan still appears to be claiming he knows nothing about the dossier. now here's what he said on meet the press earlier this month. take a close listen. >> when did you first learn of the so-called steele dossier and what christopher steele was doing? >> well, it was not a very well-kept secret among press circles for several months before it came out. it was in late summer of 2016 when there was some various u.s

outlets who asked me about my familiarity with it. i had heard just snippets about it. i did not know what was in there. i did not see it until later in that year, i think it was in december. but i was unaware of the providence of it as well as what was in it. it did not play any role, whatsoever, in the intelligence community assessments that was done that was presented to then president obama and president elect trump >> tonight brennan clearly has some explaining to do. if brennan didn't know much about the dossier and didn't see the entire thing until a month after the election, why was harry reid specifically referencing it in august of 2016 after being briefed by brennan? and why according to sperry did brennan insist that information about the dossier be included in president obama's daily intelligence briefing? now those are just some of the major burning questions that john brennan has to answer

tonight. now, paul sperry is also reporting that the former director of national intelligence, james clapper is now facing scrutiny. serious questions will being raced about what clapper cnn told about the dossier back in october of 2017. let's watch him >> with respect to the dossier itself, the key thing is it doesn't matter who paid for it. it's what the dossier said and the extent to which it's corroborated or not. we had some concerns about it from the standpoint of its sourcing, which we couldn't corroborate. but at the same time some of the subs and content, not all of it, but some of the content of the dossier we were able to corroborate in our intelligence community assessment, from other sources which we had very high confidence for. >> hannity: that's fascinating, because it looks like going back october, there is clapper, trying to lay the ground work for the argument oh, it doesn't rally matter that hilary clinton paid for the russian dossier

with russian government lies all in an effort to lie to the american people and influence an election. it appears clapper is also trying to cover his tracks because the obama administration knew well before then that clinton shelled out over $12 million dossier dollars for christopher steele to write this russian propaganda. the other fascinating aspect, clapper claims that some parts of the dossier were corroborated. all right. the question is, which ones and how? now remember the house intelligence committee memo exposes how in their application for that fisa warrant that the f.b.i. says it verified the dossier with the yahoo news article written by michael iscough, and michael is cough's source was christopher steele. so the f.b.i. never actually independently verified any of this. so is that what clapper is talking about? so it's time for brennan and clapper to face congress. they now need to go back under oath and talk about what they

knew, what they found and when they found it. we did reach out to harry reid, john brennan and james clapper for comment, they didn't get back to us. i'm not going to hold my breath. also, tonight, pressure is mounting on suzanne rice to start answering questions. why did she email herself on president trump's inauguration day about an important meeting president obama had with former f.b.i. director comey way back 15 days earlier on january 5th. now senators grassly and graham are out with a letter that rice explain herself. according to senators, they discuss the january 15th email as a national archives request between meetings between president obama, and james comey regarding the bureau's russian investigation. so in the email to self, self, let me send an email to self, which graham is calling disturbing, rice writes president obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue

was handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities by the book. the president stressed that he is not asking about initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. he reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book. from a national security perspective, however, president obama said he wants to be sure as we engage with the incoming team that we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to russia. hmm, what's his role in this? now the next part is redacted. then before we continue, why would the president not want to share information with the trump transition team? what does he think might have happened? who told him what, when and where? remember, obama did ah mend the executive order, 12333 that allowed the wide sharing of nsa raw information across 16

intelligence agencies but he didn't live with that rule under his administration. rice continues, the president asked comey if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. comey said he would. on a statement to fox news.com, seuss an rice's attorney is claiming tonight that what she did is not unusual, it was merely an attempt for rice to memorialize the meeting for the record. 15 days later. okay. and rice's attorney also attacked grassly and gramp for daring to ask the question. it's all very strange. there is more to this story, i can promise you, and eventually we'll unpeel that onion. it will be investigated. also, great reporting from the washington times. he's highlighting all the allegations in this phoney dossier that have yet to be verified 20 months later. and scar broing is writing how it's been 20 months since former crith british spy christopher steele first went to the f.b.i. and points out ten major

accusations from the dossier that have never been verified. we'll give you the top 5 for the constraints of time. the trump campaign launched an exentive conspiracy with the creme lynn to intier fear in the election. scar broing rightly notes it hasn't been verified. he maintained an eight year relationship with give and take with russian intelligence. not verified. mr. trump and senior campaign aids actively support the russian hacking of democratic parties stolen emails. never verified. carter page and campaign manager paul man fort personally conspired with moscow to hack the democrat's computers. that wasn't verified either. and by the way, the hacking started in 2015, and neither paige and manahfort weren't part of the campaign then and both denied the doss in an in that case. the last one, discussing bribes for working to lift economic

sanctions. and scarborough writes that carter testified under oath that he never met or talked those people and page has also filed libel lawsuits. those are just some of the allegations never verified in this phoney dossier. so though i understand people are being paid to verify it to this day. the bulk of that fisa application consistes of this unverified dossier, and james comey and the f.b.i. never bothered to verify it. neither did fusion gps. nobody verified is it. we can't verify any of it until this day, though a lot has been proven false. now also breaking this hour, byron york has a stunning headline. comey told congress the f.b.i. agents didn't think michael flynn lied. according to biron york during a march 2017 briefing, comey said the f.b.i. agents who interviewed lieutenant general michael flynn did not think that he lied or that any inaccuracies in his statements were

intentional. then comey added that the agents didn't think flynn would be charged with a crime related to the interview. so why months later was flynn charged with a crime of lying to the f.b.i.? remember, it was peter struck who, in fact, interviewed general flynn. that's a question, we the american people, you the american people deserve to know the answer to. here with reaction. so many requests tonight. former deputy assistant to the president fox news strategist. james, i've known you a lot of years and i have nothing but the deepest respect for all law enforcement. they risk their lives, they keep our country safe. they do it because they love their country. as a former top f.b.i. guy, you're watching all of this. what are your general thoughts? >> well, i agree with what you just said, sean, and yeah, we've known each other for a long time, and we both respect,

certainly, my 27 years and the people i worked with. yes, we did risk our lives from time to time, and we came to work every morning because it was the right thing to do to protect the american people on a whole host of jurisdiction that the bure rowe had, and also working with the state and local law enforcement. i've been extremely, extremely upset about this. i mean, a year and a half ago i started to watch what jim comey was doing and it made no sense. what he was talking about was way outside the boundaries of what the f.b.i. actually does, the procedures the f.b.i. goes through in investigations. it was clear to me that he was playing with a different drummer, let me tell you that >> hannity: let me ask you, in all your years in the f.b.i., did you ever hear of an exxonration months before the principals, some 18 of them, including the main principal, is ever interviewed? did you ever hear of an fisa court being handed information

that they know is political and who paid for it and not telling the fisa judge and not verifying it? >> absolutely not. i mean, that never took place. i was involved with numerous, numerous fisa ryders when i was the head of the f.b.i. in new york and when i was an agent, and it just doesn't happen. it never happened. it's pathetic what went on. i believe what happened, sean, we're talking about a small number of people. comey brought in the psycho fants and put them together on the 70th floor of the hoover building, and took the investigations out of the field offices, new york, and little rock and other places and they conducted a sham investigation. >> hannity: was comey -- >> was comey not smart enough when he was dancing with the devil that the music was going to stop some day? it did, and then he had that pathetic press conference that

was so far out of bounds. of course all we know now since then, just pathetic. >> hannity: doctor, we've got this new information, paul sperry tonight, which i think is fascinating. comment on brennan clapper and seuss an rice's email. but we haven't gotten to the bottom the unmasking, the leaking of raw intelligence, which we know a crime was committed on general flynn. at least i do for somebody who served our country for 30 years of his life. what do you think of these new developments? >> finally we get to find out who is behind the curtain, and it's going to the very top of the last administration. we've been talking about fisa-gate or memo-gate. we'll probably talk about obama gate. look at the facts already. sean brennan, google who this person is. john brennan in 1976 voted for

gus hall, the communist party candidate for american president, and then he joins the cia four years later. then obama eventually makes him director of the cia? a man who voted for the communist party to take over america? look at susan rice. >> hannity: i'd never heard that by the way. that's news to me. i'll dig deeper >> it's on cnn. >> hannity: if it's on fake news cnn, it's got to be true. >> it's on the washington examer and cnn. he got in trouble because he didn't know if he was going to pass his polygraph in 1980 when he joined the cia. this is the kind of people who ran the obama administration >> hannity: what do you make of susan rice? that is the biggest cya i've ever seen in my life >> but look at the arrogance of it. it's not even subtle. it's straight out of shakespeare. the lady doth protest too much.

when have you ever sent an email to any of your colleagues in your whole career where you say by the way, let's make sure we're doing everything legally just like we've been doing, wink, wink, know what i mean? >> hannity: yeah. last word, jim? you get the last word. >> just one thing, the unmasking part of all this, that is the big story. the u.n. ambassador, ah soman that pow samantha power, at lea 260 unmasking requests? why? in a year? >> hannity: we're going to get to that too. last word, jim? >> yeah, i agree, is he bastian, absolutely. we're just the tip of the berg here, sean as you've mentioned for months now. this unmasking is a big thing. uranium one. even ben gauzy. obama basically turned loose to

conduct all this fraudulent crap around the election to not have trump be elected and it continues to this day, this phoney investigation. >> hannity: i've got to run. one of the reasons we're getting to the truth and i think our audience needs to know this, because there are good and honorable people. most of them. the vast majority. the 99%, and the f.b.i. and the intelligence community, they're fed up with this. they're now talking and stepping up. thank you both. it's been a while. when we come back, ed henry and newt gingrich straight ahead. my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh

the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free. (announcer) purchase $699 or moret tat helzberg diamonds and get a free megablast waterproof speaker with built-in amazon alexa. a $339.98 value.

>> it's a busy day in our nation's capitol as the heads of the intelligence agencies were on capitol hill where they briefed lawmakers on a wide range of national security issues. live from washington with more,

ed henry. the only frustrating part was every time they said we'll talk about that later in closed session. i want to hear it now. >> there are certainly things you want to hear about, and other things you can't hear about because it might be classified. and they did have a classified session later. and as you noted, a lot of major ground cover as the nation's top intelligence officials ran threw a litany of security threats. many of the senators wanted to talk about russia, russia, russia. sounding the alarms with north korea being potentially serious about using their nuke later weapons. >> they they should not believe the smile campaigns despite the gushing headlines they've seen in the media outlets. they also warned about the media threat of islamist militants, and cheaply made fen ten knowledge being smuggled into the u.s., because the open yawed

crisis is killing thousands here in the u.s. every year. though those were not mentioned until the write-up of this hearing because senators tried to hammer president trump about alleged conclusion in 2016 as the intel officials warned of the legitimate threat of russia trying to disrupt the 2018 midterms. though they mentioned that chip ah, iran, and north korea are also >> the president continues to deny the threat posed by russia. he didn't increase sanctions on russia when he had a chance to do so. >> my problem is i talk to people in mane ma maine who say the whole thing is a witch hunt because the president told me. >> do you believe there is an actual or appearance of a conflict of interest when the president is put in charge of declassifying information that could complicate an ongoing investigation into his own campaign? >> hannity: this hearing was damaging for the trump administration when the f.b.i. director, christopher ray

testified under oath that his agency delivered the background investigation on white house aide rob porter in january. that directly contradicts claims that the background check was still happening when he stepped down over domestic abuse allegations. but a top white house official tells fox tonight that john kelly's position is still rock solid as chief of staff despite speculation to the contrary, sean >> a lot of speculation out there. >> hannity: thank you, ed henry in dc. joining us now author period of time new york times bestseller vengeance. mr. speaker, i can't get over two very important things here. and that is comey and strop's exxonration before investigation. and a fisa memo they know hilary bought and paid for, that is presented to a fisa court, and they don't tell the fisa court that hilary bought and paid for the russian lies.

this is about impacting the incompetent at theing ritt of the elections of this country >> i think we're in george orwell territory. this is why he wrote 1984. he was terrified as he thought about it, about the power of a state to begin to change history and to force people to learn a fake history. what you're seeing here is every -- you don't have time for this. every day something new un-ravels. something falls out. you see things, and who would have dreamed of susan rice writing a memo to herself the way she did after a meeting. the memo sounds like a whitewash memo, let me write this down so if anybody asks it will look

correct. >> who would have imagined as we're writing more and more about the former director of the cia who certainly sounds like he is the worst possible person to have been in charge of the cia during that period. now, every time we turn around there is some new, and i think very sobering revelation that doesn't fit the world you and i thought we lived in. >> hannity: why would i read susan rice's memo. do i read into that oh, oh, there might be something else, and that's why the cia was done 15 days later? then i see the involvement of brennan and clapper, then i look at comey, and exonerating. this whole thing was rigged. james is right. then, of course, the fisa memo. >> look, i continue to tell people i think the most fascinating single thing is the text message to his girlfriend or vice versa that they have to

prepare this briefing for comey, because comey's going to brief obama, and the president wants to know everything. now, i never heard comey said he'd briefed the president of the united states. it strikes me it's pretty easy to say to congress, you've got to bring comey back in under oath. how often do you brief the president? what did you brief him about? what was he concerned about? i mean we're at the edge of senator howard baker saying the question is what did the president know and when did he learn it? >> hannity: it really has taken a turn in that direction. >> then you bring the president down to loretta lynch who is meeting with bill clinton the week that his wife is going to be interviewed. interviewed being a phone phoney term by comey who is writing her exxonration for two months before the interview. i mean, you couldn't make this up as a serious novel because

there are so many pieces here that are illegal that you couldn't imagine senior people doing this >> hannity: every night on this program i'm adding new information and still, because the story is getting so big and impacting so many people, you kind of have to build the bridge every night so everybody understands what the new information is. but i want to stay focused on the fides ah for a second. it was unverified by gps. unverified by the f.b.i. they knew hillary bought and paid for it, and they didn't tell the fisa judge. it wasn't done just once. they attempted it in july. they didn't get it. in october, they got it. they renewed it three times, and the bulk of information that was presented was that clinton bought and paid for dossier that they never informed the judge about. if i'm that fisa judge, i'm calling those people back in yesterday. >> well, look, at this point you

also have to say when is the congress going to call in the fisa judge? what was the fisa judge thinking? why did he do it? why didn't he ask these questions? i mean, it's not implausible to say to the f.b.i., gosh, where did you get this dossier from? how was it produced? have you validated? i mean, apparently the f.b.i. validated nothing. they took this document and walked in and gave it to them without any validation >> hannity: yeah, unbelievable. i agree with you, mr. speaker. just last question, historically, i keep saying it is so much bigger than watergate because of the use, the highest levels, the highest echelons of intelligence, the f.b.i., the doj, and the absolute abuse of

power, the intelligence weaponry we have and also the deception to the fisa judge. >> look, i believe this is the clearest example we've had of the danger of a deep state. here you have beaurocrats out of control with the power of the government, threatening, i think, to undermine the entire process including blocking trump from being president and protecting hillary. and it's only an accident. let's not kid ourselves. a very small number of people in wisconsin, michigan, and pennsylvania changed history or we would have learned nothing about this. >> hannity: well said. mr. speaker, take care of the cough. i've had it for a week myself. feel better. when we come back, the ladies of the view taking a nasty shot at

the vice president and his faith. jesse waters, it's his world straight ahead.

the more you know the the commute is worth it.me, for all the work you pour into this place, you sure get a lot more out of it. you and that john deere tractor... so versatile, you can keep dreaming up projects all the way home. it's a longer drive. but just like a john deere, it's worth it. nothing runs like a deere. now you can own a 1e sub-compact tractor for just $99 a month. learn more at your john deere dealer.

>> hannity: it's no secret that the liberal co-hosts at the view on abc, they'll stop at nothing to trash all things donald trump. but today they may have hit a new low with donald pens, suggesting his relationship with god must be crazy and dangerous >> i think what's interesting is she says that jesus tells mike pens things to say. >> when was she around mike penns though? >> obviously she was around him. >> when you have a mike penns that now puts this religious veneer on things and now calls people val use ce that now puts this religious veneer on things and now calls people val use voters. >> look, i'm catholic, but i don't know that i want my vice president speaking in tongues. >> it's like i said before. it's one thing to talk to jesus.

it's another thing when jesus talks to you >> exactly. that's different. >> that's what mental illness, if i'm not correct, hearing voices. >> my question is can he talk to mary gag did a lynn without his wife in the room? >> the reaction, the co-host of five and jesse waters, and jessica, by the way, jesse's world, even though i'm on the road today and we all live in it. >> i can still feel it. >> you're not feeling it? rather, let me start with you. why is there over the years i've watched and i've seen this all the time, there is this compulsion on some on the left, not everybody, but many, but to insult and demean people's deeply held religious values and views. here's a vice president that is a christian. the lord's prayer says, you know, thy kingdom come, thy will be done. it doesn't say mine. it doesn't say mike pence, it doesn't say anybody else.

he never said anything to the contrary. why is it that it's okay to demean those values? why do i believe if you demean other people's values that you're going to get a very different reaction? >> i don't think it's okay to do that. what i wish the co-host of the view had done is talk about how un-christian the chk, let's talk about the budget that slashes medicaid. refugees, mike pence doesn't want them. i believe we're supposed to take them in. talk about taking away health insurance from women. and this is a man who was appalled from the access hollywood tape. >> hannity: you're going back to the talking points. >> no, that's the original. >> hannity: this is why i think the left, and the democratic party in general will have problems with red state america because they're constantly insulting and demeaning the deeply held values of many people. >> this is like crumbs, this is the deplorables. abc has a real problem on their

hands. imagine if joy behar said this about muslims? she'd be canned in a second. for her to say that christians are mentally ill, i think it was her friends that were screaming at the sky and behead page donald trump. let me make one thing clear. democrats are okay with reverend wright speaking to barack obama, but they don't want jesus talking to mike pence? this is how insane this is. >> hannity: you want to respond? >> well, i think one is an actual person that can walk into a room and one is somewhere up above. i'm not a christian. >> people who listen to god and hear god when you're in church. you don't believe this is okay, jessica? >> this is all from comments that ohmrosa made here. someone who is out for self-promotion, if you watch any of the big brother stuff. >> right, so why is the view denigrating omarosa when she gets canned, calling her a liar and pa ryia, and then using her

as a source? >> for rates. everything is for ratings always, jesse >> right, i feel like i need to go to confession after watching the view, because it feels like listening to joy is a sin. speaking of sin, omarosa said she wanted to sleep with pierce morgan for ratings, and called him gay when he denied her. the whole thing is disgusting, and i need to wash my hands after this segment. >> think how i feel every day. >> hannity: let me go to susan rice. when somebody says 15 days after a meeting, oh, barack obama said do it by the book. oh, barack obama said do it by the book. oh, barack obama said do it by the book. why do i read that and say, okay, barack obama didn't say do it by the book. i don't believe it. that memo is so suspicion, the biggest cya i've ever read in my life, and i think there might be something on the other side of that. jessica, are you going to defend

that? >> i am, and i'm going to use newt gingrich to help me out because this morning on fox & friends he had a different analysis with that than he did this evening with you. he said to the host this morning that he's done that himself, and gone back to something that's happened weeks before and wrote a memo >> hannity: that's not what he said tonight on my show. he was talking about 15 days later. i don't know anybody in the final minutes in the white house, their final act, let me say barack obama said we're going to do this by the book. i sense a lot of fear in that memo >> yeah, it's crumbling down. she's a liar. she lied about ben gauzy. she lied about burkedaal, she lied about the unmasking. comey lied to the fisa judge and lied about when he melt with barack obama. brennan's a liar, and he lied about the dossier and whether it was used to justify the wire tapping. the whole thing is crashing down, and the demes are scrambling and can't contain the fallout. >> hannity: thank you both.

jessica, i hope you enjoyed jesse's world. you lived in it. >> i did. i shall come again >> hannity: when we come back, the immigration battle in washington, d.c. you don't want to miss that next. you won't see these folks at the post office they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras

including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again go to stamps.com/tv and never go to (al♪rm sounds) oooooooooh! you sleep on a poorly crafted mattress, you might find yourself sippin' a hot cup of mud, too. you need a ghostbed™. the only mattress with cooling latex over gel memory foam to give you the deepest sleep. delivered to your door. in a box. at a great price. because you shouldn't have to pay a lot for a great night's sleep. order your ghostbed™ today and receive $100 off plus two free ghostpillows. ick! ghostbed™. amazing mattress. unreal sleep.

>> sean: all right, this morning president trump weighed in on >> hannity: this morning president trump weighed in on the daca debate. saying republicans want to make a deal. democrats say they want to make a deal. wouldn't it be great if we could solve the daca puzzle. this will be our last chance. there will never be an opportunity march 5th. immigration attorney francisco hernandez. francisco, you have said that you support building a wall. want to build a wall, build a wall. you've said that many times. the president has said a wall with a door, and we get to --

people get to come in this country if they get to do it legally. i'm sure you probably have no problem with ending chain migration, and no problem with the visa lottery. is it worth, do the democrats really care about daca, because if they did, they'd sit at the table, wouldn't you take that deal? >> me? yes. take any deal that you can, absolutely. just put it on the table because the house is going to ruin it. the house is going to depart from donald trump as quick as you can. carlos moore told me the democrats have to come to the table. but the republicans will run because they're scared and they'll abandon a voter base. my father has voted republican since the day he became a citizen. you know what he says, guys, we are leaving them on the table >> hannity: all right, i don't think the democrats want to deal, dan. they'd rather run it to 2018.

they don't want to deal. okay >> they don't. >> hannity: go ahead, dan. >> yeah, they absolutely don't want to deal. what francisco is not telling you is barack obama had an operational filibuster proof majority for months in the early days of his campaign. the democrats could have done it with no republican help at all, francisco. you know what they did, zip-o >> i got it. i agree with you >> no, i'm not done. they did nothing. listen, there are a number of republicans, by the way, me included, who don't believe in amnesty. i don't believe in breaking the law and rewarding it. but there are a number of republicans -- francisco, hold on, who absolutely support a daca deal. i'm not one of them. >> mr. hannity, you and i have gone 17 years, mr. hannity, you and i have gone 17 years. this is the perform storm. we either cut a deal or we don't. >> hannity: look, i'm with dan. i wouldn't support it. >> build a wall. who cares. give it all he wants >> hannity: this is the

problem, dan, you always get the spending increases, you never -- i'm sorry. you never get the spending increases. you always get the tax increases. you never get the wall built. you always get the amness fee >> build the wall. > hannity: in 1996, in 2006, if the president does any deal, he better get the money up front because they'll never fund the wall. >> yeah, and what happened to mexico paying for it? build a wall? we'll have to legalize 100,000 mexicans to build it, and that's a darn good start. >> hannity: okay. >> i'm mexican, i can say that. it's okay. >> we already saw this with simpson-miss stoley in the regular an years. we're promised a bunch of stuff in exchange for amnesty, and you never get the border security in the future. francisco, with all due respect, it's amazing how you're so quick to throw the republicans under the bus here, when it's a republican president on his own twitter account offering a deal. it's the democrats walking away

from it. >> i didn't throw the republicans under the bus. >> hold on, time out. >> i didn't. >> are you going to let me finish a sentence here? are you thinking about this rationally or emotionally? >> yeah. >> the republican president of the united states has offered you a deal. just take the deal, democrats. take the deal >> take the deal, except the republican house will run from it. that's what you get. the democrats are idiots, and the republican house will run for it. pass it in the senate. put it on the table, let's go. mr. hannity, you and i have been to the border. we have done this. we have looked at it >> hannity: thank you both. we'll come back. our hannity hotline video of the day. (announcer) dance to your own beat this valentine's day.

purchase $699 or more at helzberg diamonds and get a free megablast waterproof speaker with built-in amazon alexa. a $339.98 value.

♪ last night took a l, but tonight i what's an l? ♪ the rap singer took a loss and now he's ok again. right. yeah you can get a mortgage that avoids pmi, but there's no way to avoid mip on... . hey! this'll help. rocket mortgage by quicken loans makes the complex simple. so, origination fees... this takes care of it, thank you. understand the details and get approved in as few as 8 minutes. by america's largest mortgage lender. bounce back, right right right, i get it now. ♪ i woke up in beast mode, with my girl that's... ♪ >> host jimmy kimmel has developed "a reputation for him

to use the show to seize the moral high ground on his favorite liberal positions." last night he cracked some jokes at the north korean olympic cheerleading squad >> the stars of the olympics so far are the cheerleaders from north korea. have you seen them? it doesn't seem like they know what they're cheering. the north korean women lost to switzerland, they cheered the zamboni machine when it came out. seriously. they're cheering like their lives depend on it because they do. they literally do. >> okay. you guys try it. ready? okay. okay, great. they villi well done >> all right. jimmy, you shed a lot of tears on your program over the past year. do you have any sympathy for the

numbers, hundreds of thousands of north koreans that have beenen slafbed by their government, killed by their government, the population that's been starved by their government? i'm not so sure that fits with your liberal mindset. time for the hannity hotline. take a listen >> sean, you need to be on valium or some kind of downer. >> you're an idiot, end of story. >> if i were you i'd get the first right on the movie called dossier. you'll make billions. >> unbelievable. do you have anything to say? doesn't matter. nice, mean, hateful? you want to talk about laura ingraham? now, tomorrow night, we're digging deeper. we'll have tick-tocks and breaking news tomorrow night that i know is coming. and now we have obama and susan rice, and brennan, and clapper, we're just beginning to touch the surface. all right, remember, this show will always be fair and

balanced. we hope you'll set your dvr to never miss an episode. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham is standing by >> what are you giving up for lent? you're going after poor old susan rice and brennan. can you say those names backwards really fast? >> hannity: what are you giving up? maybe i'll give up the e-cigs that i got ridiculed for using for giving up cigars >> are you a vapor, sean? are you veeping? >> i'll give up that and my beer at the end of the night. just ruin my whole life >> no, sean, that was a great show tonight, awesome as always. thank you so much. we'll see you back here tomorrow night. all right. >> tonight. you're not going to want to miss a moment. andy mccarthy is going to explain why senate investigators are calling an email from susan