greg: one participation in the lumix and the other where his leather pants. special thanks to terry, shawn, kept sam's and tyrus in the studio >> welcome to "watters' world", i am jesse watters. life warning signs. at this point hoeven is a details of the perkins school shooting. the less separate facts from section. for big lies you've probably heard over the last few days. number one, there been 18 school shootings in 2018 alone. this has been repeated by democrats on television and shared millions of times on social media. the statistics came from bloomberg anti-gun group. but the statistic is bogus. the washington post calls the number, flat-out wrong.

there were anything like accidental firearms discharges in school parking lots. late at night while no students were present and no one was injured. second lie, the shooter, nikolaus cruz, was member every white nationalist group in florida and participate in paramilitary drills. this was based on some racist comment looking for attention here but the media ran with it without fact checking. police say there is no connection with the shooter in this white nationalist group. line number three, how many times have you heard the, these types of mass shootings only happen in america, outline? let's look at statistics. the debts from mass shootings were over 15 people are killed are higher in europe, africa, india and pakistan. line number four. the shooting is the presidents fault. here is jimmy kimmel.

>> he still not done anything about, nothing, you have literally done nothing! you like to say this is a mental health issue. but what of your very first actions as president was to rollback regulations that were designed to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill. you do that. your party voted on that. i agree this is a mental illness issue. because if you did i think that we need to do something about it, you're obviously mentally ill. >> that is propaganda. three major news networks like abc, cbs, nbc pushing the same thing. the president and the republican party made easier for mentally ill people to purchase guns. why would they even do that? it does not make sense! because it is false. let's say a 65-year-old collect social security disability benefits. and someone else can manage those benefits. the obama administration wanted to prohibit that person from

buying a gun. because they did not control their own finances. so they cannot protect themselves? even the aclu, americans association people with disabilities said this was unconstitutional. and now, to the warning signs. a few months ago nikolaus cruz wrote a comment under a youtube video that read, i am going to be a professional school shooter. the man who posted the youtube video contacted the fbi. the fbi did not contact nikolaus cruz. we will have that tipster here in a moment. in addition, on january 5, of this year, in other tipster close to nikolaus cruz called the fbi tip line and reported that he owned a gun, wanted to kill people, was exhibiting erratic behavior, posting disturbing things on the internet and warned that he may shoot up a school. the fbi just released a statement. under established protocols, the information provided by the caller should have been assessed as a potential threat to life.

the information then should have been forwarded to the fbi miami field office where appropriate investigative steps would have been taken. we have determined that these protocols were not followed. this is a sickening incompetence by the fbi. the fbi has a very poor track record when it comes to missed signs. hernando knight clenching the fbi investigated the terrorist for 10 months before the attack. but they said he never broke the law so they did not do anything. the boston marathon bombing. the fbi received a tip from the russians that the brothers were radicalized and training for attacks. the fbi never visited their mosque. never interviewed the wife were friends and never shared information with local law enforcement. they close the case and two years later bombs went off in boston. in the south carolina church shooting. dylann roof should never have been able to purchase a weapon. but the fbi examiner conducting a background check failed to

get the police report that showed he had a conviction for drug possession. and the fort hood shooting. army made have been emailing with a known terrorist overseas. and had been radicalized but because of political correctness, the fbi dropped the ball. hindsight 2020. now, there's a very clear pattern of the fbi missing warning signs and that is unacceptable. join me now, the blogger that notify the fbi about cruz. then, you see this comment on the youtube video this is i want to be a professional school shooter and you contacted the fbi. what happens next? >> after i contacted the fbi, i contacted the local office because i could not find an email address. they sent to agents out right away. the two agents came to my

office and gather the information that i had to offer. they took a copy of the screenshot and i thought initiate a investigation. >> and you never had any more contact after those fbi agents. there was last you heard from law enforcement on the issue? >> until the day of the shooting. that is correct. >> okay. so, what happened on the day of the shooting? you are contacted again? >> on the day of the shooting, the fbi agent that came to help us in september contacted me and asked if they could meet and him and his partner came to my house and asked more questions to see if i had further information about the subject. that is when they told me that the subject had the same name as the comments on the video. >> all right, your expectation when you dropped the dime on cruz was that the fbi would

follow up and contact cruz. my understanding is that you go to youtube and say hey, youtube, i need information about this commenter. he has a very strange spelling of his name. i think one of only eight names elba got in the country. can i get an ip address so i can track this guy down? is that we think they would do? >> you know, i do not want to speculate on how the fbi conducts their investigations. i know in the digital world that we live in, people get tracked down on a regular basis. >> they do get tracked down on a regular basis. there is another disgusting facebook page, people want to kill republicans. it is all over the internet because of what happened in this shooting in florida. it is on facebook, i mean, you're a guy that chaffetz and youtube and social media. what type of responsibility to these sites have when they host this kind of hatred?

>> well, you know that is a very touchy subject with -- we have freedom of speech. people can say a lot of things. and that is covered under freedom of speech. but i think when you make threats, serious stuff like that, they definitely need to be investigated. >> all right, he did but the best that you could and thank you for keeping an eye out. and good luck with everything and i appreciate you coming on. >> all right, thank you. >> china with former deputy assistant to the president and fox news contributor, doctor sebastian. you heard my word at the soccer was pretty much laid out how the fbi dropped the ball twice in this flourish in them into the history of other mass shootings and terror attacks. what is your opinion on the fbi is performance? >> jesse, this is a very personal subject for me.

before i cancel my house i spent 12 years traveling the country, going to field offices across the america. training people that keep us safe every day. i have a massive respect for them. it is absolutely incredible that in less than 72 hours the fbi has a ready-made to massive failure. and any threat assessment, it doesn't matter whether you're staring down north korea or whether you're staring down hitler for the soviet union or future terrorists or mass school shooter. it is a simple set of questions that you have to ask. does the individual threat, the person, organization, have the capability to do damage? and second, doesn't have the intent?in this case, it was clear the individual had both the intent and as he posted on social media as someone close

to him till the fbi. and if you look at his firearms history, he had the capability as well. >> i mean he had the guns on all social media pages. i think we have some pictures. he is posing with all sorts of ammunition and targets and he has a space disguise. we know that he had been torturing animals. we know that he sipped his dog on pets from neighbors. and his house had called the police what was a, 19 times in a few years? >> 39 times. >> 39 times! when you look at the threat matrix, he is in a comment has been expelled from school, he has two tipsters out there. the blogger and the person close calling it in. how does the fbi not see this, dr. sebastian gorka? >> clue they saw something because they went to meet the blogger. you just had on.

after that they talk about protocols and a statement. what is the protocol that says, we don't look at this case anymore? we need to find out who made the decision in san bernardino with the boston bombers, with this attack. >> i want a full audit on everything! if there is a company that goes bankrupt or makes a bad trade, people are held accountable specifically. and you know the person in charge. we had it all run down at the top. the boston marathon bomber. now in fort hood, that guy did not do a correct background check. >> hang on. fort hood, great mention in your monologue. it is even worse in fort hood. he was not just in contact with one of the top al qaeda guys. this was lands for investigations. this was played for the fbi. and if you read the official report, the former director of

the fbi, justice webster wrote the real report on this. get this. the criminal investigation said, there is a quote - in the email. we are not going to investigate major because an investigation of the major now could adversely affect his military career. >> who cares! he shot like a dozen people at the base! unbelievable! let me ask you this, let's look at the big picture. we have lots of resources going into this up trump/russia collision investigation.a lot of manpower and a lot of money. now special counsel. there is more evidence that the fbi has missed on domestic terrorist attacks and mass shootings in this country than there is actual evidence that trump could with the russians. it is like they are wasting a lot of time and energy on something where we have seen on numerous occasions, it has been based on lies!

and propaganda! do you see it this way? is it fair to make that assessment? >> there are two really big issue strategically. number one, political correctness is getting in the way of doing business. whether it is the boston bomber, the fort hood should or maybe this is just as well, some protocol may have been affected by political correctness. so they are not doing their due diligence. when it comes to russian collision, i have a newsflash for adam schiff. a newsflash. russians have been messing up other peoples elections since 1917. since the soviet union was created. great! let's find these people, is prosecute them. it has nothing to do with donald trump. it has nothing to do with paul manafort, advising ukrainians and not disclosing his wire transfers. >> yes, years ago. >> come on! >> we are just learning now that there are a bunch of indictments that have been

dropped on some russians that were in the united states and masquerading as american citizens and trying to divide the election. they were doing pro trunk rallies, antitrust rallies. and i'm glad that the russians are being mischievous and breaking american law. it does not sound like anybody on the trump campaign was indicted. where is it, where is the evidence dr. gorka? >> can i quote the most relevant personnel? i was in the oval office with the president in june. he was frustrated with all of the bogus fake news. he said to me, they will not find anything because there is nothing. there is no russian collision any trump campaign or trump administration. the fact is, they want to undermine us. have been trying for the longest time. and that can be dealt with by our counterintelligence capacities that the fbi and

intelligence community. but robert mueller, you will not find anything. i am sorry! >> democrats are allowing the russians to achieve their goal. because they have put so much emphasis on russian interference and this alleged collusion in this investigation. they are sowing the discord that the russians have been trying to accomplish. >> beyond actually colluding themselves, jesse. >> we look for the money went, you had to pay for russian lies to get a wiretap. >> and illegal wiretap. that is the disturbing thing. because the fbi and doj did not tell the fisa judge. we do not do in america. that is illegal. >> it is illegal. okay dr. gorka, thank you very much. >> thanks jesse. >> up next the vicious attacks against christians. so, from the two trucks over here...

i want you to pick a new truck for your mom or dad, knowing that they could possibly pass it down to you one day. cool. but before you decide, you should know that chevy silverado's are the most dependable, longest lasting full-size pickups on the road. which means that ford f-150s are not. (laughs) which truck would you pick? the chevy. the chevy. the chevy. there you go. boom. that was obvious. plus it looks cooler. no doubt about it. now they know what to get me. (laughs) >> breaking news this weekend.

deputy attorney general rod

rosenstein announcing new indictments in the robert mueller russia probe. 13 russians, charged with interfering in the election. the interference did not affect the outcome. >> there is no allegation in this indictment that any american is a knowing participant in the illegal activity. there is no allegation in the indictment that the charge conduct affected the outcome of the 2016 election. in the nature of the scheme was to take extraordinary steps to make it appear they were ordinary americans. even going so far as to base their activities on a virtual private network here in the us. so if anyone kissed the back of first jump they would appear to be americans. we are still waiting for the trump indictments, right? laney davis served under bill clinton. and the author of the unmaking of the president 2016. i am looking at this announcement here. we are reading through it and

we are trying to see where is trump involved in the russian indictments? i do not see it. >> in latin indictments. and even there is a contradiction election and all allegations. >> the russians tried to interfere in the election but he is never believed that they affected the outcome. >> he actually has denied that the interfered and has never said interfered. so call the white house and i have a better line than i do. donald trump has never admitted, in fact he is contradicted the intelligence communities finding that the russians -- >> don't you see why though? he has a clear victory in the electoral college over hillary clinton. and he had said there that would undermine his credibility. >> use the word because of fear that is not what i said.you

can have your opinion of something being because of. i said that donald trump has never confirmed that the russians interfered in the election. that is a fact. now we contradict that statement? >> i will not contradict the statement here what i want to talk about is the indictment because you guys keep moving the goal post. first it is collusion and obstruction and now you have after this is something donald trump may or may not have said and he wanted to admit it. that's fine. let's look at the indictment. a bunch of russians get fake ids and go on twitter and tried to pay someone at a rally to hold up a gallery for gel sign and that is what robert mueller has been working on this whole time? it seems like after all this morning and manpower this is

all that they have? of course we know that the russians are messing around! >> first of all, i do facts, you do rhetoric. that is what we both do.>> i mean that was a fact cited from the indictment. >> actually, nothing in the indictment are facts, there allegations that need to be proven in court. these people are innocent until proven guilty. >> that is not what you said about donald trump. you have accused him of you know being guilty of obstruction and collusion. all of your friends, love to do that. i'm glad that trump is innocent until proven guilty. >> i don't know if there's a change of name you are my friend. i never do that. you know that.>> i will give you the benefit of the doubt. go ahead. >> my book is about a statistic. that on october 28 in the morning, hillary is winning by a large margin and three days after the james comey letter is written she's just to drop like a rock. now, james comey, there's one thing that donald trump and i and you agree on. he should have been fired. i think for a different reason than donald trump.

but what i wrote the book about is not to say anything was because of. you cannot prove russian metal enclosed clinton to lose. it clearly had an impact when you cannot prove that. but you can prove that statistically, after the letter hit by james comey that rod rosenstein said was a reason for him to be fired. and i agree with that. >> yes, you and i agree that he botched the clinton investigation for you probably disagree with the way that he botched it than i do but of course it is true that she started to draw forth she had been dropping a little bit and then he announced about the email server on anthony weiner's laptop. but she does have to take responsibility. james comey would not have made the announcement she had not set up a private server and then deleted all of those emails and cause all of the problems to begin with. >> cristobol, she had taken responsibility for a mistake on the use of email. that can be true. it can also be true that if not for that james comey letter she

would win. i think i put that in my book statistically. at least we both agree that james comey botched his professional duty. it was not to hold a press conference he is not an elected official. he thinks he is an act that he is but he is not. he deserved to be fired. >> i agree and if hillary did win she would have canned him as well? let's take a look back at the summer, 2016. you can argue that he let her off the hook and that there was evidence that could have been used to recommend an indictment and the languages softened by peter strzok. a pro-hillary supporter at the fbi. and then she was exonerated before she was in an interview. there is a lot of evidence to suggest that in the summer, james comey let her off the hook! >> i cover that and thank you for asking that. i cover that in my book. 33,000 emails, not one, was identified as classified. not one ever found. >> there were classified

emails, or private server. >> i said by the stamp that is a positive carpet every classified document be that is the reason why there can be no criminal case. and james comey was correct and then it was a chance of there being a criminal case without a classified stamped email. >> lanny davis, left to run. your book looks like it will be a big one. it will have to compete against james comey spoke. hopefully people have enough money in the economy to buy two books! >> i want to company that have watched you grow up on television behind the scenes in on camera. you are a great i think, a great television person. i take some credit for your success. [laughter], thank you very much because i used to book your cars and preinterview you years ago when you come on fox. thank you for being on "watters' world". >> thank you. >> we will be right back.

you won't see these folks at the post office

they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again >> you would be worried about

him.

he is extreme. i love jesus, i am christian. but he thinks jesus tells him to say -- [laughter] i said jesus didn't say that! >> that is omarosa, former white house aide taking a stab at their vice presidents faith. he got one from the ladies of the view. >> argument another woman vice president speaking in tongues. >> like i said before, i don't know if i want -- it is one thing to talk to jesus and another thing when jesus talks to you. >> exactly! >> well -- [laughter] >> that is called mental illness if i'm not correct. >> what concerns me is how long the conversation? >> can you talk to mary magdalene with out his wife in the room? >> and abc maintain a broadcast forum that compared

christianity to mental illness, is just wrong. and it is an insult, not to me but to the vast majority of people that cherish their faith. it is simply wrong. for abc. a television program that expresses that kind of religious intolerance. >> here with reaction, fox news contributor, tommy. what you think about that? it is just outrageous! >> the ladies of the view, it is pretty much par for the course care what i think is interesting about the ladies as they talk about being loving and tolerant. they are tolerant of everything and everyone. they are tolerant of every other religious belief. they are tolerant of no religious beliefs at all. except if you are conservative christians in the mafia, they make fun of it, they laugh about it, it is for their josephine really, but all vice president that is disturbing and disgusting. i surprised that abc is okay

with it. >> what you think reaction from abc would have been if joy behar had said, believing in a lot and being muslim? that that would be a sign of mental illness. >> i don't think that she would ever set up if i were on the view for example and i would've said that, i would be on the chopping block for sure! and ridiculed up and down like i already am for many other things anyway. beyond that it goes to show that the left can get away with anything. and they do that by calling themselves comedians. look at chelsea handler, joy behar, they say it's okay, we can do whatever we want because we are comedians. they allow it, people left and they go about and do it again next week. >> i tried to use the allah, i was just joking, they never let me got away with that. i want to ask you to react to this video. this is joy a little while

back. let's see what she had to say about god then. >> tell us. >> i am being told by god to save the country. >> so she herself listens to god speak to her. unbelievable! we do find these things. >> again, it is the left because they believe they are almighty and they believe that unlike the vice president, the lord is allowed to talk to them, god is allowed to talk to them. it will save the country, they will save the country from fox news, from donald trump, from christians. that is what they really believe and they are empowered to do so because people laugh at their jokes and they get away with it time and time again. but i think this time it might be different because there are a lot of questions in the country that are not happy about the comment. >> they got a lot of grief. especially megan mccain. i would think that if god did talk to joy, he would tell her, love thy enemy. because there's a lot of hate on that show.

and megan is the only one fighting the good fight. tomi, thank you very much. >> of course. >> does posing nude and power women? we debate it, up next.

>> the latest for sports illustrated news hits the stands. but a fight broke out over one of these photos produces aly raisman with #me too all over her naked body. and why does a woman have to

pose nude to feel empowered? is it more empowering to keep their clothing on? in a classroom like everyone's an excel? swimsuit desperately wanting to compete with ig models with gimmicks. and a pro golfer in one of the women in the issue, there she is. took offense to your comments writing, but women feel empowered in different ways. and it is not right to tell someone what they can and cannot do. it is more about the person that you are and not the clothing you decide or not decide to wear. my body, my choice. that went on for a while. and we are joined now two talk about this. and then at the end they say thanks i will end this flashing alaskan over here. throwing it back in your face. there it is.what is the

problem? are you call now or not? >> mildly. it's funny i actually got a lot of tweets from gentlemen on that site saying that you got more news that we did valentine's day week. my whole thing, i do not even know that she was in the magazine. she's a former golfer, she is a beautiful woman and i told her that. and everyone watching the second analogy of the right to feel sexy, just the way you want and if you want to take all of your clothes off, that is your prerogative. the issue that i have is that sports illustrated decided to capitalize on the #me too movement and they are caring about. this is still a very profitable partner sports illustrated announced a 10 percent of the magazines revenue. just one magazine. for the whole year peers they really want to cash in on that and for me, aly raisman, the gymnast that stood in front of the pervert, larry nassar stood up for women, strong, empowered, dress professionally. that did more for women's rights than getting naked.

and she did not have to get naked to do it. that is my point. >> so you see no problem with using this #me too movement as a way to discuss sexual boundaries and women's empowerment. when you combine that with taking up all of your clothing. so emily, do you see a problem with getting completely naked or just stripping down to a bikini in order to sell this movement for in order to just feel empowered as a woman? >> readycome i feel it differently and that being empowered is being able to make a choice or decisions autonomously. an independent choice, free of fear or pressure. so taking aly raisman for example, she was told for years what to do with her body by larry nassar and team usa. and she was being subjected to random sexual abuse. so her decision not to participate in sports illustrated campaign take the

photograph and it is absolutely empowering. because it is coming from an autonomous place and is entirely on her own. as you stated earlier, i was an nfl chiller for many years but i was captain, i went around the world and visited the troops. all the while i was a practicing attorney. in my swimsuit photo was on sports illustrated online, maxim.com, all of these things. and it was crazy to me the 1/100 people would come up and make some type of blanket generality statement to me about my position as a role model or lack there of in their eyes. i felt intellectually lazy frankly. someone would make that type of judgment or global judgment. >> is a woman or professional woman with a great legal career, it is her decision to take her clothes off or to wear a bikini and that is her decision. that does not make her as a

woman, less, have less integrity. >> i think that we disagree then because you know, personally, i made an effort to not have anything depicted in a bikini or such overtly sexual photos on my social media pages because i know i had to go into the workplace the next day. and if i want to be taken seriously, just as a man would want to be taken seriously, i can say this about men. chris hemsworth, he is very good looking and he is naked with words and his pelvic bone. i will not be thinking about equality. it is a visual means. >> that is why i don't like to put a lot of pictures of me in a bathing suit on social media. i just think it takes away my intellect. and i really want people to respect that. emily, do you see what she is saying here, you want to be able to work into a room as an attorney and not have naked photos in your past floating around.

where people on the other side, defense attorney or prosecutor. with a little wink and a nod and taking that seriously work may be joke and it diminishes your credibility. you see that point? >> yes. and just to make clear there are no negative photographs. and the nfl cheerleading team they take photographs. i do think that there is a larger conversation here. and one character can be impugned numerous ways. but if a woman chooses to pose discreetly, it is her choice to do so. she feels empowered by owning what she does with her body and owning the message that she sends because it is her choice to do so, then to meet up point remains. in the whole point about the interpretation being construed differently. that is exactly the point. it is separate from the

original issue.>> i understand. and i want to make it clear to the audience that we did invite page on the show to be fair and balanced in debate. but she chickened out. i'm just kidding, she just said she did not want to do it. i don't know why. but i wanted to make sure everyone knows. i have to run. thank you very much and have a great weekend. >> thank you for having us. >> thank you. >> up next, the obama portraits. i cannot wait to hear what they have to say. with expedia, one click gives you access to discounts on thousands of hotels, cars and things to do. like the occidental at the xcaret destination for 32% off. everything you need to go. expedia. >> this week the official

portraits of the former president barack obama and his wife michelle were revealed. but the modern paintings elicited mixed reviews. joining me now we have thoughts to my favorite ladies, diamond and silk. ladies! let's take a look at the picture of barack obama. what do you see right away with this lovely green monstrosity? >> it looks almost like a photoshop. i was thinking the garden of eden with the snakes or may be hiding in the thick of things.

because it is so thick and i know that some are saying that allegedly he may be behind some of this unmasking. so that was what i was thinking about that. >> and apparently, the artist that did the portraits, kehinde wiley, i am ms. pronouncing the name. is famous for doing portraits of black women beheading white women. you see the very similar floral backdrop. i mean, i do think they chose this artist to begin with? they just wanted to be different? i mean, have you ever seen a normal portrait of a president? it does not look like this. >> i have no earthly idea! but i do know that obama was in awe and we would like know that doesn't even look like you! that was photoshop. and then we look at michelle obama -- >> that is a president with a bunch of other presidents.

it looks out of whack. look at michelle here. what strikes you here? >> that is not her! who is that woman? >> who is that woman? >> we do not know who she is. that does not look like michelle obama. i don't know what that artist was thinking. >> you don't think that the face resembles michelle at all? >> number i could have did that right there. that does not look at michelle obama. i can't believe that they are like all my god, these are nice! no! >> b when someone takes a picture of you on their phone as you look at it and you say -- what is that? [laughter] real quick, i know you are russian icons. i want to get your take on this new trend. men wearing dresses. >> i am not for emasculating men and making men appear to look weak. you know, my man, i want him to

wear a suit or some pants. i do not want him just like me, i don't want him getting his nails are like me, i'd wanted putting on no wig like me! i wanted to be all man. >> and thank god this will fade away very fast. >> i know how much you love me. you are saying even if i were a judge he would turn me down? >> women are not going to like that. women do not want their man dressing in dresses, no! >> listen, you can catch the ladies and their beautiful outfits when they go on tour and check out their website diamond and silk. thank you very much! >> thank you for having us. >> up next, last call.

my name is jeff sheldon, and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free. >> four last 12.

road rage involved and then from time to time but i don't did you ever seen anything like this. [video] >> oh my god look at this -- he said -- all my god! oh -- this is awesome! he rolled down the window. he spit at him! oh -- oh my god! >> he flipped it. bad move. that's all for us today. follow me on facebook, instagram and twitter. "justice with judge jeanine" is next. remember, i am watters and this is my world.♪

♪ [music] >> hello and welcome to justice live from nations capital. i am jeanine pirro. you for being with us and thank you for making justice number one again last saturday. doctor ben carson, and more on deck +1 of the presidents top spokespeople standing by live. but first, my opening statement. the fbi needs a complete overhaul cleansing. any company or organization that runs afoul of its mission or is tainted by corruption in politics, the ceo and the board of directors will go.