display but not subjected on the dna test. it's been a blast sitting in for my friend shannon bream. thanks for washington. watching. good night from washington. i mike emanuel. ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight" and happy presidents' day. you may have noticed an accelerating cycle in washington lately. here's what it looks like. the permanent class hates donald trump. they attack them as racist, criminal, a foreign spy looking to destroy america. trump, because he watches more bad television than is healthy, sees these attacks and responds with hostile tweets. m his critics point out those tweets as evidence that trump is every bit as bad as they said he was and so on. the latest installment of the saga took place over the weekend.

cnn political analyst warned that trump's criticism of the media improves he's a would-be dictator. >> discrediting mueller, discrediting what may come out of the justice department, discrediting the press of what mueller does, this is what splits a country apart and this is the beginnings -- in many other countries it is the beginnings of enough authoritarian rule. >> tucker: that's kind of hilarious. the irony of course is that he spent much of his own career in government, not simply criticizing reporters by actively lying to them, as is custom. was that the behavior of a despot?o pretty funny. pause and consider this a seriously for a minute. authoritarianism, that is what our ruling class says they fears. they tell us that all the time. let's say you really were an authoritarian and wanted to weaken american democracy and oppose an oligarchy on the country. how would you go about doing that?

you'd probably start controlling what people say and think. it's a dissented from the mandated orthodox that they consider unauthorized ideas, you target them and shame them on social media, you'd shut them down in public and get them fired from their jobs, you make sure everybody is afraid to disagree with you. after that, you would work to disarm the population. take their guns away, that way they'd be entirely dependent on you for their safety, not to mention unable to resist your plans for them. just to make sure you quelled all opposition, you would systematically target anyy institution that might oppose or put brakes on your power. you would be especially concerned about churches, the family, and independent businesses. you'd be certain to underminehu and crush those using laws and relentless propaganda. if, despite all that, if election results didn't go your way, you'd use an entrenched bureaucracy to neuter any leader you had it handpicked yourself. you'd be shaken by an election like that and would

resolve. to make sure of that, you'dha worked tirelessly to replace the old and ungrateful population with the new and more obedient one. that's what you do. sound familiar? we are not talking about donald trump. for all of his faults, trump isn't doing any of that. our ruling class is, and that's what all these issues are really about. the speech codes, the calls for gun control, the demands for unlimited mass immigration. none of that is designed to help you.u. none of that will make you happier or more prosperous. that's not the point. the point is to make you more dependent on the very people who are yelling at you right now on cable television. they are the authoritarians. mark steyn joins us tonight. authoritarians, it's a little ironic. these people are calling the population that while simultaneously trying to control the population by any means necessary. >> exactly.in in fact, the reason they wound up with donald trump getting elected president is because they got a long tradition of

doing this to any republican. they did it to bush, they did it to mitt romney, who is a very definition of a milquetoast, and yet they managed to claim that he was some kind of nazi because he drove the dog to canada or whatever it was. in the end -- in the end, trump was the only guy who could withstand the kind of careless demonization that goes on. it's interesting, you gave all those examples of the authoritarian trends on the left. there's lots of other ones, too. david gergen didn't get upset when sheldon whitehouse, a democrat senator, proposed that people that disagree with his views on climate change should be subject to criminal prosecution. he didn't worry about the authoritarian temptation when the democrats in the senate

voted effectively to neuter the first amendment. he didn't bemoan the trend towards authoritarianism when the previous administration weaponized both the justice department and the irs to go after its ideological enemies. worst of all, he didn't bemoan the trend towards authoritarianism when dozens of democrat legislators, before trump had even set foot in the office, decided to boycott his inauguration, which is the very defining act of a free society, the peaceful transfer of power. david gergen didn't whimper a word when dozens of democrats decided they were going to boycott the inauguration. >> tucker: he seemed deeply unconcerned. i was thinking, what do all these issues have in common? gun control, mass immigration,

attacks on the nuclear family. we all headed households the patriarchy. they never let up with that. what is that about?mi it seems to me that the family is the final bulwark against this threat of government power. when you are stopping loyalty to your family first, you could be controlled. >> i would say that one of the most disturbing trends, there is an indian professor in bangalore who bemoans the way western leftists have nationalized the family. they started off by nationalizing the mines and car industry. when all that didn't work, theyu actually figured out it's best just to cut to the chase and nationalize the family. what matters in any society is the intervening institutions between the individual and the government. you mention the family, you mentioned the church, it is also

things like town government and county government.t. when you have serious resolutions like the soviets and the french, they abolish all those. the soviets did go very far to abolishing the family. we've got something slightlyar different, as we've seen in florida. you essentially have got government social services, you got government police agents at multiple levels monitoring someone, and they are actually -- these things are not as effective as in fact a functioning family and letting parents raise their children, as opposed to having doctors determine that your 7-year-old is going through bit of a phase, so let him get transitioning to a girl.im they are at war with all the intervening agencies between centralized power and the individual. >> tucker: it's not anwe accident. brilliant analogy. thank you very much. >> thanks a lot, tucker. >> tucker: this past week it

was not a high point for responsible political analysis, to put it mildly. robert mueller's indictment onon russians for muddling during the last election. president trump tweeted, "obama was president up to and beyond the 2016 election. why didn't he do something about russians meddling?" b it's a fair question. the media were not impressed at all. various russia experts competed to see who could find most over a top analogy to express their outrage. "the washington post" nearly won with this one. >> you look at the president's tweets this morning and try to imagine if franklin d. roosevelt after pearl harbor had gotten on the radio and said that tokyo was laughing at us, to use a little less crude phrase than he did. that's not what is called upon a president to do right now. >> you know will happen, someone on fox news will take what you just said and say how dare you compare this to pearl harbor. >> it is an attack on our

country. it is an attack on our country with use of 21st century means. it is definitely a national security threat. >> tucker: [laughs] yes, someone on fox news might be reasonable and subject the analogy to critical analysis. pearl harbor was a sneak attack by the japanese that killed almost 3,000 americans and lead to four years of global war.of yeah, that's almost identical to russians taking on facebook ads for the next election. over on twitter, "the washington post" compared the whole thing to 9/11, who tweeted "imagine if after 9/11, the president saw the attack as a political embarrassment to be minimized rather than a national security threat to be combated. that's roughly where we stand after the second worst foreign attack on america in recent decades." after 9/11, we gave up on 9 standing civil liberties and invaded two countries and hadd minor interventions across the

globe that have killed thousands of u.s. soldiers and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people. if he had his way, we would have attacked iran also. we may still come as he's urgin urging. is it suggestion that we bomb moscow? let's pause and think about this in a nonhysterical way with facts, if possible. obviously, we have to acknowledge that russia is trying to meddle in our elections because they did. but scale matters here and everywhere. here's what actually happened during the 2016 election. according to facebook, their own numbers, russian companies spent a total of $46,000 on ads before the election. that's less than what it cost to buy a new chevy suburban, by the way. by contrast, the trump and clinton campaigns spent a combined total of $89 million. that's not including the online advertising by interest groups such as the nra and

planned parenthood. russian spending did not amount to much, but it was also badly targeted, comically so. five times as many russian ads were run in maryland, a bright blue state, as in wisconsin, a which was on the line. most of the facebook ads in wisconsin went up prior to the wisconsin primary and none of those ads mentioned trump. details matter. washington, d.c., is the single most democratic place in the country, more than 90% for hillary, received more targeted ads from the russians than pennsylvania. in the end, that when the trump, and sons on. as any political consultant could tell you,he this accomplished nothing. the russians weren't effective more off-line. the rallies they organize on facebook attracted almost no attendees with one exception. an anti-trump rally that was organized after the election solely for the sake of undermining results of that election. this is a minuscule operation that succeeded only by the complicity of our news media.su the goal was to undermine american society by fueling political division.

the russians must be pleased bya their handy work, not because trump was elected but because our talking heads share their faith in an election. chris hawn is a former assistant to chuck schumer and he joins us tonight. chris, if you look at the actual facts here, this is not a defense of anybody meddling in our system, which is universal as you know. it's everywhere. i'm not defending it. i'm just saying let's be real. they did not a single thing of any effect at all. they spent more in d.c. than pennsylvania. what? >> the ads are just part of what they did. they had thousands of fake identities on facebook and twitter that were rallying against the election of hillary clinton. i'm not saying that that determined the election, but they surely were meddling in the election, and that's why 530 out of 535 members of congress overwhelmingly voted53

for sanctions against russia as a result of this, and thesi president, to this day, still has refused to enact them. >> tucker: look. those are two separate questions. how honest you want to be about the extent to which our policies determined by the priorities of other countries? let's be totally real. the fact that the majority of congress voted on anything is not a sign it a good idea or if good response. sanctions against russia are a good idea if they help america's strategic priorities, and a bad idea if they don't. let's address the facts. a what specific did the russians -- and i'm not defending the russians, compared to what the chinese or the saudis? you want to talk real interference in our country? seriously. >> they were spending over a? million dollars a month in violation of our campaign finance laws. they were involved in our election. whether or not they had an effect, i don't know. they were meddling. h.r. mcmaster agreed they were

meddling. the only person that doesn't seem want to take action on this is the president of the united states. >> tucker: let's just be real. i want to say for the record that i am totally opposed to this. for any critics saying, you never criticize the president. let me criticize the president by saying what we are doing in syria is contrary to american interest, we just killed a bunch of russian citizens in syria. is that enough? does not make you feel better about him not being a russian agent? we are killing russians! >> you know what i think the response needs to be very similar to the response we had with the sony hack where we responded proportionally with other cyber methods, which this country is perfectly capable of doing, and there are sanctions that the congress voted on that the president should an act. >> tucker: don't ignore my point because it's a real one. isn't it a little implausible to describe the president as a tool of putin when we are killingn' russians in syria and opposing -- russia's only base

outside of its own border is in syria. we are challenging that militarily.at is that not significant to you? >> we are not intentionally engaging russians in syria. >> tucker: that's not true. >> to the extent any russians not an attack on the united states of america. >> tucker: they were killed by a drone and it was clear that it was russian military equipment they were in and they were russian contractors. we killed them. the left wants a war with russia. i'm against it. >> i don't want a war with anybody. >> tucker: we are getting one thanks to the lunatic rhetoric of the left, which is pushing this administration into a totally counterproductive -- >> 530 members of congress are not the left, tucker! they are mostly republicans because they mostly control congress. >> tucker: it doesn't make their judgment wise.e. i don't care if it's every single member of congress or -- i don't care.be

you can't justify that on the grounds that it helps america because it doesn't. >> every intelligent agency in this country says that the russians are still meddling in our democracy. let me tell you something, the next time it might not help your side. it might be -- t >> tucker: it's not about helping anybody side. do you think the saudis are meddling in our democracy more or less than the russians? what about the chinese? >> i don't know and i don't want to guess. i would assume that they are. >> tucker: they are. if you compare the money -- oh, should we do sanctions against saudi arabia? >> we should because we don't need their oil anymore because we got our own fuelea source. >> tucker: what about china, who has hacked into every mainframe the u.s. government maintains? should we impose sanctions against them? oh, no, we can do that. speak of the president and his campaign he said he would act

against china, yet he hasn't. >> tucker: do you think we should impose sanctions on china right now? >> if they are engaged in cyber warfare, we should respond in kind and impose sanctions. we should bring into the the table to get them to stop. >> tucker: should we kill chinese soldiers, do you think? >> no! i don't think we should kill anybody. i'm not for hot war with any of these people. >> tucker: but your for sanctions -- >> you have a president -- the president is right when he says that they are laughing at us in moscow. they are laughing that they continue to do it and nobody is doing anything about it. >> tucker: russia is basically a third world country that poses no longterm threat to us. china is taking over the world because we are ignoring it. >> it's funny what you can do with a laptop and a troll farm. >> tucker: thank you, chris hahn. the president has fixated on guns, but it could be our own media who is turning into violence killers. not a crazy idea.

♪ . sfx: muffled whistle text alert. i'm your phone, stuck down here between your seat and your console, playing a little hide-n-seek. cold... warmer... warmer... ah boiling. jackpot. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, you could be picking up these charges yourself. so get allstate, where agents help keep you protected from mayhem... ...like me. mayhem is everywhere. are you in good hands? trust #1 doctor recommended dulcolax. use dulcolax tablets for gentle dependable relief. suppositories for relief in minutes. and dulcoease for comfortable relief of hard stools. dulcolax. designed for dependable relief. he gets the best deal on the perfect hotel by using.

tripadvisor! that's because tripadvisor lets you start your trip on the right foot... by comparing prices from over 200 booking sites to find the right hotel for you at the lowest price. saving you up to 30%! you'll be bathing in savings! tripadvisor. check the latest reviews and lowest prices. they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again

♪ >> tucker: last week's shooting in parkland, florida, has sparked new demands for gun control across the country. the course, america's gun ownership rate used to be a lot higher than it is today. deadly school shootings are mostly a recent phenomenon. what has changed? could it be our overall culture has undergone a toxic shift? thee governor of the commonwealh of kentucky and suggested that violent video games and tv shows have created an "desensitize

culture." d the governor joins us. thanks for coming on. >> agreed to be on with you, tucker. >> tucker: that is kind of the questionld. fewer american households owned guns then 50 years ago when we didn't have school shootings. what do you think the difference is between then and now? >> i think we had to ask ourselves what has changed. your point is well taken. of gun ownership itself has not changed, and if, in fact, there are more gun restrictions now. there are more rules about who can and can't own a gun or how a gun might be acquired then there were 50 and 100 years ago.ul and yet, children did not slaughter children at school. what has changed? it isn't the gun. something culturally has changed. i would suggest that we have become significantly desensitized to death and violence. we are training children, whether we intend to or not,re whether it's anyone's desire or not, through video games, through movies, through musical lyrics, through television shows, increasingly during prime time.

the amount of violence is increasingly realistic, increasingly graphic. there is a cost to this. you couple that with the number of psychiatric drugs that children and adults are on. the number of warnings about depression and suicidal thoughts, you couple all of that with the fact that our societyty have shifted to the degree that they are largely nonexistent. we know longer have these delineated boundaries. everything is somewhat gelatinous. these children are increasingly coming from broken homes as well. they find themselves rudderless. you are a father and you understand it's important, what happens at home is a profound impact on what your children do out there. too many children don't have the blessing of having a stable environment at home. we have to look at what has a changed in society and not have a knee-jerk response that another rule and another regulation is the answer.

>> tucker: everything you'verk said makes sense. i don't know the social science on it, but it doesn't sound crazy at all. it seems kind of obvious. sum up quickly why you you think what you just said gets a hostile reaction from some people. f why do they hate to hear that? >> it does not fit the narrative people want. for a thousand reasons, people have a preconceived notion that another gun restriction, another rule or regulation or governmental intervention of some sort is the answer. when in fact, nobody wants to look at what they have to look at if it's not that. that is, what our responsibility is in society as individuals, as parents, as teachers, as educators, as people in the churches and civic organizations and youth organizations, what are we not doing that was done a generation ago to provide the type of guidance that young people need as they grow up?

not the least of which is how you deal with differences ofou opinion. i will tell you one other thing i've not said but i'm sure this will make people's heads explode. we are lionizing some of the children that we do this. not anyone's intention, but we are making heroes of a child who has no business to have their face put out there. another young person who is in the balance, psychologically unbalanced will say why not? i will get my 15 minutes of fame. if we don't think there is a copycat mentality, we are not paying attention. >> tucker:r: that's the nature of the internet. that was interesting, thank you. dave grossman is the author of "assassination generation" and he joins us tonight. thank you for coming on. >> thanks for having me on, tucker. you know, you just said you haven't seen the social science on it yet. here it is. >> tucker: that's why i want to talk to you. this is the kind of idea that

gets dismissed as crankish by people who know nothing. >> the ruling class. >> tucker: what is the social science? >> surgeon general after surgeon general has made statements where matters came before the supreme court, california law to regulate children's access to video games. the video game industry has found 82 journalism -- 82 media professors that told the supreme court there is no scientific proof. it was academic malfeasance. our entire medical community screaming from the mountainside. one of the dissenting justices in the supreme court that i'm not a medical expert but i know who is.i it's not 82 journalism professors. it's the entire medical community, thousands and thousands of scholars telling us. >> tucker: i can't imagine as anyone i'd rather less take advice from thin journalism

professor. i can't imagine a dumber group of people. unbelievable. [laughs] >> the malfeasance of journalism professors making a joint statement to the supreme court -- here's what's important. look at this. it was 2002, an identical crime happened in germany, 19-year-old high school dropout murdered 17 people in school. identical crime. germany, 2002. it is not about the guns. germany can't stop it. we saw this weekend, a massacre in a church in russia. russia is a totalitarian nation. they tried to confiscate every gun for a century and they can't stop people from getting guns. the most horrific juvenile massacre in history, a 17-year-old kid in 2009 in germany murdered 15 people. germany can't stop it. russia can't stop it. it's not about taking away guns. it's about giving people more rights. >> tucker: i noticed that.

why are the media so hesitant to go after the big businesses that are profiting from this garbage? that's a question i'd like to explore. >> it's their donor base and their voter base. they know that they've lost the gun owners. they know they lost those votes. to attack the gun owners, and especially to protect the video game industry, this iswn their donor base. >> tucker: that's exactly right. thank you. i appreciate and agree with you. >> one last thing, we are teaching the kids that we don't need more wolves. we don't need more sheep. we need sheepdogs. the whole sheepdog -- we are changing the world. there is hope for america and it begins with you. thank you for what you do. >> tucker: i appreciate it. thanks.. the left is extolling russia's meddling as a hyperefficient hacking effort. data suggest they were actually deeply, deeply incompetent. that story is next. ♪ pass please. i'm here to fix the elevator. nothing's wrong with the elevator.

right. but you want to fix it. right. so who sent you? new guy. what new guy? watson. my analysis of sensor and maintenance data indicates elevator 3 will malfunction in 2 days. there you go. you still need a pass. there you go. in your noise cancelling trheadphones?ry maybe not. maybe you could trust you won't be next to a loud eater. (eating potato chips loudly) or you could just trust duracell. (silence) ♪

when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly... ...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want.

don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices.

woman: where are we taking him? i have no clue. we're just tv doctors. if this was a real emergency, i'd be freaking out. we are the tv doctors of america. together with cigna reminding you to go, know, and take control of your health. schedule your annual check-up today. >> tucker: former hillary clinton campaign chairman john podesta had a hilarious exchange this weekend on cbs. they asked why the russians seem more capable of targeting swingr states than the hillary campaign did. watch this. >> how is it thatss these russin operatives knew to focus on purple states like michigan or didn't? >> of course we spent a lot of time and energy in all the states. >> hillary clinton did not spend much time there. >> at the end of the day, we fell short in those states, and

i think this active measureses effort by the russians could have tilted the election in donald trump's favor.rt >> tucker: [laughs] keep telling russians turned out to be not very good campaign operatives and were terrible at targeting swing states. according to robert mueller's indictment, they didn't even know what a purple state was until 2016. just a few hundred bucks were spent on key states like michigan and pennsylvania. thousands are wasted in states like california and maryland, obviously were going democrat from day one and did. an attorney a renowned campaign finance expert who has been on a long time joins us in the studio.in if you were attempting to defeat donald trump, or rather hillary clinton in favor of trump, would you have w done wih the russians did? >> i would've spent a lot more than $46,000 or whatever number it is. the senate intelligence committee heard testimonies from facebook that they can only account for $46,000 total.

>> tucker: why are we hearing a million dollars? >> i heard today too. it's a democratic talking point. they keep having to change the fact so they can make it look like there is a lot more. >> tucker: does that number come from anywhere? >> not from what i have seen. the testimony from facebook is $46,000. testimony before the senate intelligence committee, the hearing was that it was in the neighborhood of $100,000 total. >> tucker: total. so this was the most expensive presidential campaign ever waged by anybody in the history of the world. 46,000, put that in perspective. if i were running for wyoming's one congressional district seat, would i spent 46,000? >> no, you would spend a lot more than that. look, the campaigns together spent $81 million on facebook on social media.

that doesn't count all the super pacs, all the party committees, just the two campaigns. the money that was spent on the russians on social media was a drop in the bucket. as the deputy attorney general as the deputy attorney general said, there's no evidence itit influenced the outcome of the election. >> tucker: how many lobbyists here in washington do you know that spend more on lunch every year? >> i don't get their lunch -- >> tucker: it's a lot. i'm against foreign intervention in our elections, in our policies. though it's universal. would do you say compared to the efforts of other governments to influence the way this countryd operates, that this is a big effort or small effort? >> you know what, tucker, that's afr really good question. frankly, i think andy mccarthy at "national review" over the weekend made a really good point, which is why is this being treated as a lawsuit.

this is counter intelligence. this is what should be dealt by our defense and intelligence agencies, not by a prosecutor filing a criminal indictment against people that are not in the united states, and this is never going to go to trial. >> tucker: because it's inherently political. it's making the ruling class feel better about themselves. >> they should feel worse because it shows -- the president's right. it does not show any kind of collusion, cooperation whatsoever with the trump campaign. the only collusion there might o be is what's going on with the left and the russians since the election. >> tucker: how about since 1917? some of us remember. great to see you. the next u.s. census is just two years away and could be having your voting power diluted by illegal immigrants. that's a real thing. we will explain how it works next. ♪ friends, colleagues,

gathered here are the world's finest insurance experts. rodney -- mastermind of discounts like safe driver, paperless. the list goes on. how about a discount for long lists? gold. mara, you save our customers hundreds for switching almost effortlessly. it's a gift. and jamie. -present. -together we are unstoppable. so, what are we gonna do? ♪ insurance. that's kind of what we do here.

♪ >> tucker: at least one politician in europe is fearlessly raising an alarm about the kind of society european elites want to create. one that is rejected unanimously almost by their citizens. in a speech yesterday kicking off the party's bid for reelection, hungarian prime minister warned politicians that they will destroy western civilization with their enthusiasm for mass migration. left unchecked, he said europe could end up with a muslim majority while the continent's christian population would be blotted out. it's not crazy on a mass level here. the birthrate is not high. it wouldn't take a huge wave of immigration from muslim nations to overrun and eventually obliterate a culture that's been there for thousands of year. in america, that is considered a small point. who cares. if you've been there for a millennium, maybe you do care. they show that most europeans agree with that.

last year majorities in germany, france, belgium and several other countries said they wanted a total freeze on immigration from muslim countries. naturally, e.u. leaders denounce victor or brown asm authoritarian. heldld areas. considering their source. their motto effectively is do what we tell you or you hate democracy. how is that orwellian? this country is said to have its next census in 2020. we have to every ten years. p unless policies change, the census will be counting illegal aliens the same as everybody else. the census hasn't asked about citizen status since 1950, so a lot of people get a boost of representation because of the 1 illegal immigrants in their state. this is a problem. it's not democratic. kansas secretary of state says it is time to change that and he joins us that tonight. mr. secretary, thank you for coming on.re the constitution says you have to have a census. the only people whose information matters are citizens.

it matters whether citizens or not. >> think of it this way, there several hundred 10,000 people who are represented in congress. if you live in a district of maxine waters, half or more of your district is probably illegal aliens. you may have 350 citizens voting in your district, and thoses citizens vote counts twice as much than my vote for your vote in a district that doesn't have tons of illegal aliens. i you have vote dilution where some people's votes matter more than others because if they have tons of illegal aliens. >> tucker: the liberals are always yelling about how every vote counts in every vote should matter the same as any other h vote. why would they be for this? >> i think it's a dirty little secret they don't want to talk about. you're absolutely right. the 1964 decision of the supreme court voting dilution is unconstitutional. you can't have one congressional district where there are fewer voters than there are in another district. c because of illegal immigration,e we have crazy disproportion.

extraordinary numbers. in a midwestern seat, you might have to get 120,000 votes to win your election. in another district, you might only need 40,000. >> tucker: the answer is really simple, check a box, are you a citizen or not? are you allowed to vote legally? what's the argument against that? >> the only argument i've heard is a really lame one. they said people would be afraid to answer the census form if it asked the citizens or question. it's ridiculous. t we already ask the citizens question on the american a community survey, which about 1% of the population gets. this is in spiro -- the census bureau asks about that. the democrats never complained about that. only when we talk about the citizenship status on the census

to the left start. >> tucker: why should we care people who aren't allowed to vote in our elections is supposed to answer a census? >> if you are illegally in this country, we shouldn't be considering you a resident anyway. you can leave and go home any day. you could be deported and go home. why in the world will be be worried about them? >> tucker: why would your feelings matter more than a fair election? >> it's not just fair election. government needs thisio information. we can't accurately count the registration rate.'t unless i know how many citizens i have. i don't have real numbers. >> tucker: secretary kris kobach of kansas, thank you for joining us. we are not huge fans of maxine waters, but truly she doesn't tolerate suicide bombers. she's not that crazy or anything, or maybe she is. that story is next. ♪ uh! ♪i used to be spellbound hello again. ♪i used to be spellbound hi. ♪i used to be spellbound that's a big phone. ♪in your arms. [screams] ah, my phone. ♪you built the flame ♪that warms my heart, ♪but lying and cheating

♪has torn us apart ♪and i'm moving on.

you totanobody's hurt, new car. but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.

♪

>> tucker: we've had a lot to say about congresswoman maxinene waters on the show, but somehow she keeps giving us excuses to say even more. in 2002, she attended nation of islam convention, not much happened really except this. shortly after celebrating, louis farrakhan began praising palestinian suicide bombers and then praised iran for having armed them. waters wasn't bothered by this. of course not joins us tonight. the editor in chief of "campus reform" joins us tonight. [laughs] this story -- it's like you can't even believe it's real. i don't think this is going to run in "the new york times" tomorrow. l why is that? >> of course it's not. with the left, they have double standards on what actually is hateful and racism. they have double standards. this shouldn't be surprising about the nation of islam because they have been known to rape women within the religion.t they dislike people that leave the faith.

just ask malcolm x who got assassinated because he decided to leave the faith. this is the pattern with this organization. the left has different standards of what they feel is hateful. what they teach on the college campuses today is that if you are not in power, which they consider a minority not in power, then you can't be racist. this is going to be something that goes on for a long time because no one is standing up for free speech.ta no one is standing against this hateful rhetoric. we tried to report it every day at the leadership institute campus reform, but a lot of the mainstream media is not covering this. >> tucker: i should just say in the interest of total disclosure and honesty, i know some people in the nation of islam who are really nice guys.w there is no defending their core beliefs, which are racist by definition. they think that god is going to kill all white people.

that's racist, i would say. isn't it a little patronizing for the press to give maxine waters a pass in associating with something like this as if it doesn't matter? they have so low expectations for her that they don't call her on it? is patronizing i think. >> it's not just patronizing. it would be different if they were silent on all these instances of racism. when it comes to donald trump, he doesn't have to say anythingc that's actually racist. in their minds, they can form something that is racist. you are told that he spared and if you support him, you are a hateful person. now you have clear evidence of racism and they are completely e silent on this.nd it's a bunch of hypocrisy with the press.s. that's why their approval rating is so low right now with the american people because they don't trust the press. >> tucker: it's like ted kennedy could kill a woman and still be considered a great feminist.il here's this picture from obama

with farrakhan that was headed from publicc view. it was considered too inflammatory for the rest of us to see.. the press hid it from us. don't you think we should have had the opportunity to make our own judgments about that? >> we should have had the opportunity.e the media around chicago knew about this. the nation of islam headquarters is in chicago. they were known to hang out with these elected officials. the question is, not only did they shield this photo, but why did the press refused to report onse it? anybody that worked in chicago knew that they hung out together, but they refused to tell the american people. >> tucker: obama had -- according to a nation of islam guy we talked to, had a nation of islam guy working for him and his senate office in illinois. >> it's well-known. >> tucker: exactly. thank you for that, lawrence. great to see you. the national anthem somehow has become a divisive topic in neck the past year, but the

pop star fergie managed to unite the whole country behind it and never letting her sing it again. that story is next. ♪ riously hurt. it was the worst time in my life... until i met tank. you really could say hes a rescue dog. so when he got heavy and his energy slumped, it was my turn to be there for him. thats when i found freshpet. he seemed to love it! and sure enough he got down to his ideal weight. freshpet put the puppy back in my dog and gave me back my best friend.

when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly... ...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want.

don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices.

♪ ♪ for the land of the free ♪ and the home of the brave >> tucker: the national anthem has depressingly been a divisive topic in this past year. no more.he singer fergie sang the anthem sunday at an nba all-star game

and gave a strange, slowed down jazz rendition that was so off-putting that everybody is america is united in opposition to it. even fergie, who did try hard, but she's apologized saying "i'm a risk-taker but i love this country and i honestly try my best." it is of sweet actually. look at the bright side.he we are not debating the anthem itself and not people protesting during it. we close tonight show with one final thought on the gun control debate. t conservatives are demanding a crackdown on guns. "the washington post" as a second has become a suicide pact, not sure what that means. brett stephen says the second amendment should be repealed out right. regulations will stop shooting, they believe and put money by those regulations are coming. the meme makers of the internet have the same thought and a memh

like this one is making its rounds. if we make guns illegal, no onei will get shot anymore, that's how we stopped everybody from doing drugs. [laughter] so true.e.ry thanks for a great show. sean is next. >> sean: great show. welcome to "hannity." a hannity investigation. a foreign national is trying to impact an election, if it's a crime, hillary clinton, fusion gps, former british bikers first deal, they should all be very concerned. we will explain all of those. brand-new tonight, the president plastering the current media, the democrats, after the special counsel's indictment of 13 russian nationals confirmed everything he's been saying. they arens not telling you thi. there is no trump-russia conclusion. the interference did not impact the election outcome.on we have a report tonight come out byron york laying out why the media and democrats are over blowing what is muller's indictment. his analysis tonight will stun you. the russians spent as little