have the same thought and a memh like this one is making its rounds. if we make guns illegal, no onei will get shot anymore, that's how we stopped everybody from doing drugs. [laughter] so true.e.ry thanks for a great show. sean is next. >> sean: great show. welcome to "hannity." a hannity investigation. a foreign national is trying to impact an election, if it's a crime, hillary clinton, fusion gps, former british bikers first deal, they should all be very concerned. we will explain all of those. brand-new tonight, the president plastering the current media, the democrats, after the special counsel's indictment of 13 russian nationals confirmed everything he's been saying. they arens not telling you thi. there is no trump-russia conclusion. the interference did not impact the election outcome.on we have a report tonight come out byron york laying out why the media and democrats are over blowing what is muller's indictment. his analysis tonight will stun you. the russians spent as little more than three grand on

facebook ads. in key swing states that hillary clinton wasn't even bothering to campaign. this election meddling shouldn't be of surprise, which we will explain. it has been going on for decades. just ask president barack obama. we have damning videos to showsa you. breaking news from attorney general jeff sessions. he is saying that the doj abuses and the bought and paid for dossier will be investigated finally. first, tonight's opening monologue. tonight we start with president barack obama ignoring a major warning in 2014 that russia would try to r in fact interfere in the elections. what did obama do in 2016, 2015, 2014? did he even try to stop it? absolutely not. instead, just weeks before the i election, listen to what then-president obama said. >> i have never seen in my

lifetime or in modern political history any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the elections process before votes have even taken place. it's unprecedented. it happens to be based on no facts. there is no serious person out there that would suggest somehow that you could even rig america's elections. there is no evidence that that has happened in the past, or that there are instances will happen this time. i'd advise mr. trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes. g >> sean: no serious person,ry really, barack obama? he owes you, the american people, tonight an explanation. why didn't he know?

better yet, how did he not know when he was warned in 2014? that sounds like a dereliction of duty. it's time for president obama to start talking maybe under oath. now that you have the importanta background information, it makes sense why the president is firing back against this completely biased news media and the democratic party that haveat wanted to destroy him from day one over this phony russia collusion conspiracy theory. the facts do not matter for the left. they've convinced themselves by repeating their talking points in their echo chamber that somehow in some way, president trump colluded with the russians, even though as we have repeatedly pointed out, long over a year, to this day, there is no evidence of trump-russia collusion. the only concrete evidence of collusion with russia we have is hillary clinton and her boughtsi and paid for dossier that's filled with russian lies, russian government lies, and propaganda and salacious details

that were never be verified. she used that and try to influence an election with it. just like he always does, president trump is fighting back and is fighting back on twitter to react to mueller's indictment of these 13 russian nationals for 2016 electionfo modeling. the president writes, "how funny that the fake news media doesn't want to say the russian group was formed in 2014, long before my run for president. maybe they knew i was going to run even though i did not know." robert mueller's indictment clearly lays out that this russia attempt to influence the election that started in 2014, under obama's watch. and he was warned.d. he did nothing to stop it. in fact, by the way, go back to 2012, during a presidential debate. remember barack obama mocking mitt romney for saying russia still posed a very serious foreign policy threat. mitt romney was right. obama was wrong. the media ignored all key facts in the mueller indictment.

you corrupt people in the media need to listen closely, very closely to what the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein said while announcing the charges on friday. pay very close attention. you may actually learn something. >> there is no allegation in this indictment that any american was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. there is no allegation in the indictment that the charged content altered the outcome of the 2016 election. after the election, the defendants allegedly staged to rally support for the president while simultaneously staging rallies to protest his election. for example, the defendants organized one rally to support the president-elect and another rally to oppose him, both insi new york on the same day. >> sean: did i just hear it? no americans were wittingly involved in this russian effort.

this was used to sow political discord. after the election, these russian cyber trolls were trying to undermine thehe president-elect, donald trump. they were organizing dueling trump rallies in new york city and an anti-trump rally in charlotte, north carolina. instead of focusing on what is actually in the mueller indictment, what rod rosenstein said, that corrupt media of yours is trying to use it to further their fake news, russiaa conspiracy narrative. take a look. we have the proof. >> the goal here was simple. damage hillary clinton and elect donald trump. these russians allegedly went to great lengths. >> he's found this incredible network of meddling.ia he has a stronger basis on whic to go on collusion, the emails. and the issue of the obstruction of justice. >> what is going on here is establishing an ongoing crime and how it will be conspiracy to obstruct or collude.

>> there may well be information and a lot of evidence that there was not only unwitting but witting assistance from the trump campaign. >> i think the president has continued to advocate responsibility here about leading the country in response to an attack on the most core fundamental part of our democracy, are free and fair election. >> sean: he is the dumbest attorney on tv. what the destroy-trump-media also most rookie points and pieces of information about what is not in the mueller indictment and has nothing about donald trump colluding with the russians. by the way, we still have zero evidence. i'm waiting. it says nothing about members of the trump campaign colluding with the russians. it says nothing about donald trump jr. colluding with the russians. it says nothing about the president obstructing justice. the liberal media, are you paying attention? do youn? care about the truth? president trump has been saying that over and over and over

again. take a look. >> there has been no collusion between the trump campaign and russians or trump and russians. no collusion. but bottom line, they also there is no collusion. there is no collusion.e there was absolutely no collusion. everybody knows it.us >> let's put it this way. there is absolutely no collusion. that has been proven. there is absolutely no collusion. i didn't make a phone call to russia.. i have nothing to do with russia. everybody knows that. what has been shown is no collusion. no collusion. there is beenn absolutely -- there's been absolutely no collusion. >> sean: s the president also tweeted this weekend... then he added...

think about it. the president is right. for over a year, russia has in fact been laughing at us. democrats, the media have been playing right into putin's hands by creating chaos and political discord, just what they wanted. frankly it's working better than russia could have dreamed of. that is what this russian effort was about, causing chaos, political unrest in this country. the "washington examiner"'s byron york will join us later tonight. he is out with a great article, which is entitled "a nonalarmist reading of the mueller russia indictment." in the piece, york makes some very key points. namely, russians and started all of us in 2014. donald trump wasn't running. the focus was on damaging hillary clinton because everyone

thoughtev she was going to win. all of you in the media, you were laughing at the idea of donald trump running. by year and rock also cites figures from the senate intelligence committee that in the key battleground states, the russians only spent $3,000 on facebook ads. also the indictment is very vague about how much these russian trolls spent on social media ads. it only says they spent "thousands every month." that number is small when you compare it to the combined $2.4 billion that the clinton and trump campaigns spent during the election, mostly clinton. that is not that much money. also tonight, a facebook executive, he is sounding offut about the russian investigation. his name is rod goldman, the to vice president of advertising at facebook. he set the record straight on twitter this weekend, saying...

then he goes on... >> sean: evenn facebook is throwing cold water on the media's fake news mayor to have about mueller's indictment. let's get back to obama's failure. congressman devin nunes back in 2014, he raised a red flag that vladimir putin need to be watched closely. obama didn't seem to care. even two weeks before the election, he's lecturing trump, stop whining, it could never happen here. remember, as nbc news pointed out, obama didn't do more to combat russia.

he thought hillary was a shoe in. why interrupt this? what's even more disturbing is that there were even earlier warning signs from russia. we have been telling you on this program how vladimir putin had russian operatives inside america right here on our soil and how they were involved in a sophisticated plot that started in 2009. it had a main objective to get a foothold in america's uranium market.s we actually had an fbi informant and now know his name, douglas campbell. we've been telling you about this guy. this guy has testified for three congressional committees and literally was uncovering at the time in 2009 and 2010 that putin and his operatives were involved in bribery and kickbacks and money laundering and racketeering and extortion, all while corrupt uranium one deal was all being approved 18 months later. he couldn't understand why they didn't take his intelligence. that gave russia a hostel fore n

actor, control of 20% of america's uranium, who would be this stupid to do this? apparently obama and hillary clinton and eric holder and at the time the fbi director robert moeller. either way, mueller, when are you going to answer questions about this? america already, we don't have enough uranium, the foundational material for nuclear weapons. why would we give 20% to a hostile nation, russia, and a hostel actor, putin? and never made sense, it doesn't make sense. here we are years later in the media, the democrats, they are shocked. they are just flabbergasted that russia would ever even dared to try to influence our election, even though as i just explained, they were easily able to be involved in bribery, extortion, kickbacks, money laundering, and secure 20% of america's uranium. why would they stop? they know we are being stupid. plus has a left forgotten what president obama tried to do to

israel? influencing elections is wrong? tell that to the israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu, america's closest ally in the middle east. the congressional investigation found in 2014, an israeli political group used 300,000 taxpayer dollars, the obama state department in our grant to create a political apparatus to try and defeat our closest ally in the middle east, the israeli prime minister, netanyahu. it doesn't stop there. the u.s., efforts are wrong, we've been involved in influencing elections that dates back to places like italy, iran, guatemala, chile, nicaragua, just a few examples. take a look at what a former cia director told laura ingraham about the u.s. and how we interfere in foreign elections. take a look. >> have we ever try to modelfo d other countries elections? >> come probably. but it was for the good of the system in order to avoid communists from taking over, for

example in europe, the greeks and italians -- >> we don't do that now? >> well... only for very good -- >> sean: can we do a video of that of the former cia director. >> only for a very good cause. >> sean: let me be clear. i'm not saying america should not be doing this. i do believe we ought to be doing this on a regular basis. i believe in intelligence. i believe in covert operations, plausible deniability, i believe in at all. i think that we have good people. the cia, the intelligence committee, fbi, military that are doing this every day. but it's beyond naive to think that this wouldn't happen to us especially given russia's success with uranium one back in 2009 end '10. another, by the way, acting surprised by the russian election meddling, all these people in the media, they are either flat out lying to you or

they are just totally ignorant. you pick. the eve of the obama administration was not preparedm for russia trying to interfere in our election or his administration made a choicein o ignore the threat, probably the latter. probably because they thought hillary was going to win. it's that simple. that is why president obama tonight, if you really care about this, owes you the american people, and explanation. a also breaking at this hour, now that robert mueller hasn't tiedh to the 13 russian nationals, very serious legal questions are being raised about hillary clinton, the dnc, the law firm, fusion gps, the former british spy christopher steele. think about this. look at this headline fromis the website law and crime. "does moeller indictment meanic clinton campaign can be indicted for christopher steele? "wait a minute, is there a double standard? the article makes some fascinating legal points. for example, robert mueller and i to the russian trolls in part

for failingti to register as foreign agents for not reporting their actions to the federal election commission's. okay, if that's a legal standard, fine. the special counsel should also be looking into hillary clinton, the dnc, fusion gps, and christopher steele. here's why. steele is a former citizen, a former british spy. he was paid by fusion gps through that law firm tied to the clinton campaign and the dn dnc. we have not seen anything to suggest that steele was a registered foreign agent, that he reported to the fcc, that he was being compensated. if that is all true, given that information, that would mean that fusion gps, the law firm, the dnc, the concert campaign, and christopher steele should all be in serious legal jeopardy. at a very minimum, mueller should be m investigating them r is there a double standard, mr. mueller? there's already been a complaint filed with the fcc echoes the clinton campaign andgn the dnc

accusing them of failing to disclose up to $12 million that were shelled out two from thesi dossier. we know the dossier was used to influence the election. thatat was the whole point, to utilize to manipulate you, the american people. we also, know now it was also used by the fbi to get the fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign in an election year, an opposition partyty candidate. that is the only evidence we have after over a year, going on a year and a half. russian pollution in 2016 that we know exists. here is a reaction, fox news contributor investigative reporter sara carter. civil rights criminal defense attorney david chon. fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. what about that legal argument? >> that robert burns was making? a great legal argument. it's going to end badly for glenn simpson and fusion gps. w they well knew that they were taking money from a political

campaign. they were paying it to a foreign national, christopher steele, a violation of the campaign laws and is also a conspiracy to engage illegally with an unregistered foreign agents. so he's in big trouble, fusion gps, christopher steele. the question is did hillary clinton actually know this along with the dnc? >> sean: that's her campaign money. >> that's right. she would claim that she didn't know how her money was spent. she will always claim -- >> sean: sara, i want to bring you into this and then we will get david's take on this. you have a piece about andrew weissmann. i also -- i also want to investigate robert mueller not because that is the argument that that are no mike they are using against the russian nationals, why wouldn't it appld look at the team he appointed, you're breaking news article about andrew weissmann. >> that's correct, sean. if you look at andrew weissmann,

the case of it on its face, we have half of the special counsel, half of the people appointed by robert mueller were openly donors to hillary clinton. we know that for a fact. two, andrew weissmann was reprimanded inin the past quite extensively, and one case, 1997, by george were withholding exculpatory evidence. if we look at andrew weissmann, he also attended allegedly hillary clinton's party on election night. he was also very supportive of sally yates, who basically t stated that she wasn't going to follow through with president trump's orders. there's a long list of reasons why people should be concerned about the makeup of the special counsel. >> sean: david, you actually met -- we expect it inspector general report by mr. horwitz to come out next month, maybe in a couple of weeks. you met with him and you have actually spoken at length with law enforcement officials about

the tactics of what "the new york times" calls "robert miller's pit bull, andrewll weissmann. >> i met with the inspector general a couple of years agogo actually about arrid on mike broad set of problems involving andrew weissmann and his colleagues in the eastern district of new york who secured convictions of people who were not guilty of the crimes they were convicted of and frankly, the evidence overwhelming that mr. andrew weissmann knew that the time. can you imagine, i'm thinking as i'm listening to you, with the secrecy surrounding a warrant application to the fisa court, to have someone who's fellow traveler of these folks submitting applications, we know something from the nunes memo m about what was omitted from those applications -- >> sean: they didn't tell who paid for it, did they? >> that's right. we may know more. i know that congressman nunes has asked the fisa court to

provide additional information on the underlying documents -- >> sean: go ahead, finish your thought. to speak of the court said this is a novel i issue, they want to think about it. go to the justice department. we want them to turn over those documents, too. i think the problem is here, if you have a person with an agenda like andrew weissmann who, in i the normalal scheme of things, r example, in the eastern district of new york court case that i told you about in which the judgeld recommended him, suggesd he be sent for disciplinary action, that was withdrawn at the request of the u.s. attorney, which gave weissmann license to continue with all the evidence. >> sean: you can't withhold exculpatory evidence. >> and you can't deceive a court and lie to a judge and that is what appears to have happened at the hands of james comey, andrew mccabe, rod r rosenstein, and sally yates. they signed off on thees documes verifying their truth and authenticity.th it appears that that was all a

lie, and that is six different felonies, perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, abuse of power, it goes on and on trade >> sean: thank you all. it's amazing. when we come back. mine. mine. and it always will be, forever and forever. the new rx 350l with three rows for seven passengers. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.

even if you're trying your best. a daily struggle, along with diet and exercise, once-daily toujeo may help you control your blood sugar. get into a daily groove. ♪let's groove tonight. ♪share the spice of life. ♪baby slice it right. from the makers of lantus, toujeo provides blood sugar-lowering activity for 24 hours and beyond, proven blood sugar control all day and all night, and significant a1c reduction. toujeo is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash, or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be life threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision.

check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor about all your medicines and medical conditions. check insulin label each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins like toujeo may cause heart failure that can lead to death. find your rhythm and keep on grooving. ♪let's groove tonight. ask your doctor about toujeo. ♪share the spice of life.

♪ >> sean: following friday special counsel indictment of 13 russians,tm the liberal mainstrm destroy trunk media went out of their way to attack the president as they usually do. they cast an ominous shadow over the future of the trump administration. doom, gloom, hysteria daily, and they have been wrong all time. >> it's now obvious that the russians were trying to interfere in our election. >> well, it appears the stress might be getting to him.

>> this is getting closer and closer to the trumpeter circle. are the white house staff getting more and more worried about that? is this just donald trump freaking out about it alone? >> it may just be donald trumpig freaking out about it alone but his staff has to be freaking out about his freak out. to speak of the big stuff is probably yet to come. indeed, it seems as though mueller is beginning to lay the groundwork. stay tuned for more. >> what concerns me is that donald trump seems to be more upset about the mueller investigation and what came out from that than these kids who were shot. >> i think trump has got some problems. i don't think mueller would have taken the case if he didn't see a serious problem here. >> sean: some of the dumbestem people work in this profession. joining us now, michelle malkin. okay. hillary rodham clinton paid for russian and russian government lies to live the american people in the lead up to the election. then it wasn't verified, it was used to get a fisa warrant

because they never told the judge the truth. and we have hillary clinton and eric holder, barack obama administration. we have putin operatives involved in money laundering,rt extortion, kickbacks, and bribery, and they got 20% of america's uranium. nobody in the media is telling their viewers about these important things. why? speak up because it doesn't fit their narrative. they arere going to go kicking d screaming like toddlers and a tantrum, as long as they can to deny the truth that you are reporting nightly, y sean. the reaction and the responses you showed in the wake of this underwhelming indictment on friday show that so much of the opposition media is part of their own 4h club. you mentioned hysteria, also hyperbole, hyperventilation. also hypocrisy.

when they are plain, obvious, neon flashing signs and evidence of foreign modeling and corruption, not just the uranium one deal but so many others of the structure of both republican and democrat administrations, this 4h club of the opposition media has been nowhere to be found. you have to have a little bit of historical perspective here, too, sean. these are the same people that looked the other way at walter duranty and the clear and convincing and overwhelming infiltration of communist agentt during the roosevelt administration. these are people who have looked the other way at saudi and chinese and mexican meddling in our elections. so the idea that they care now, and are touting this indictment as somehow on the order of 9/11 or pearl harbor, as some of these more hysterical

journalists have done, please! the air hypocrisy is showing and it's the true colors of this media. they don't care about foreign modeling in this election. they care about bringing down president trump. >> sean: it's always been about that. you know what i have never understood about mueller? one guy in the world, julian assange. he knows where he got his information from, doesn't he? in terms of the dnc. now if they wanted to find out the leak and wear that -- they would ask him, at least asked, at least try to talk to the guy. that has never happened. so what i see about mueller is here you have all of this other evidence, mueller was the fbi director when we had an informant inside of the actual operation of vladimir putin in this country, and the fact that the media is acting all surprised and feigning such moral outrage, it is just one huge massive lie.

it's not true, michelle, because he got 20% of our uranium. how stupid are we that he got 20% of our uranium? we handed to him and we knew these crimes were committed on our soil and they did nothing! >> yes, that's right. in 2009 a came out of the book called "culture of corruption," and i pointed to all of the ways in which chicago and the potomac and the obama administration were endangering our national security, public safety, every last pillar of civil order in our country. i feel somewhat vindicated but i'm not going to cheer about it. the deep state has posed the greatest amount of threat to the fabric of our nation and we certainly didn't need 13 russian trolls to so that division and chaos because so much of it has been advanced not just by the obama operatives that remain in the deep state, for goodness'

sakes, there are clinton and carter era barnacles still in the deep state ended foggy bottom and embedded in the law enforcement agencies. the biggest sewer of division and american soil are those operatives in the so-called mainstream media. >> sean: is so corrupt and it's all boomer ringing back. i said 2018 will be the year of the boomerang as it relates to these issues. michelle, as always, thank you. when they come, the attorney general tonight made a huge announcement about potential obama era surveillance abuses. we'll explain how to create ♪ my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done.

it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

the more you know the the commute is worth it.me, for all the work you pour into this place, you sure get a lot more out of it. you and that john deere tractor... so versatile, you can keep dreaming up projects all the way home. it's a longer drive. but just like a john deere, it's worth it. nothing runs like a deere. now you can own a 1e sub-compact tractor for just $99 a month. learn more at your john deere dealer.

♪ >> sean: the attorney general jeff sessions made a major announcement yesterday in an interview on the fox news channel. sessions told maria bartiromo that the justice department will be investigating potential fisa

abuses committed by the obama administration. finally. take a look. >> are you, sir, investigating the fact that the fbi used the dossier to get a wiretap against trump associates and they did not tell the fisa court that the democrats and hillary clinton paid for that dossier? >> let me tell you, every fisa warrant based on facts submitted to that cord has to be accurate. that will be investigated and looked at and we are not going to participate at the department of justice and providing anything less than the proper disclosure before they issue a fisa warrant. >> sean: with reaction from the "washington examiner," fox news contributor byron york. formerer deputy assistant to the president, sebastian gorka. it's very interesting because we learned first, and we broke it here on this program, sebastian, that jeff sessions never recused

himself from the uranium on issue. if you would expect, lo and behold, we had another indictment. everyone thought that was a dead issue. hillary's talking point is that has been adjudicated, wrong. that is ongoing and he is saying here, i think, what i'm hearing, is if you lied to a fisa judge, he withhold information, a footnote that says it might have some political connections is not that the other candidate paid for theseer lies. i took that to be a very serious shot across the bow. >> absolutely, sean. everybody is talking about the 13 indictments. byron just wrote a very good piece about it. but the real story -- the real story that we have to get to the bottom of, are the leaks out of the white house, the 27 referrals, criminal referrals of the doj looking into the leaks including the leak of the phone conversation between michael flynn and the russian ambassador, serious national security investigations.

secondly, uranium one, absolutely strategic level. this -- it's hard to imagine something largerhi than the sale of 20% of our uranium when we have laws on the books right now, sean, that say america must be self reliant on uranium. we must not imported from anybody else, and hillary clinton approved the sale of uranium as her husband was getting half a million dollars speaking fees. there is the outcome of the clinton foundation, just the tip of the iceberg. these things take time. rest assured, justice will be done. >> sean: let me go to byron. you had a great call about last night. by the way, your website, it's horrible! i had to get you to cut and pasted and sent it to me. every time you click on it, antismoking thing comes up again and again and again and it drives me nuts. but i want you to go through this because if you really look at at the mueller indictment the way you are looking at it, it's

not what people think, is it? >> i think you need to look at this indictment in conjunction with the testimony of facebook and other social media executives on capitol hill a few monthses ago. there's a lot of stuff they talked about that is not in the indictment. what they basically talk about as some of the scale of those russian operation. they talk about the russians spent about $100,000 on facebook ads, that compares to $81 million that the clinton and trump campaign spent on facebook ads. they talked about how just 44% of those ad impressions, when they are up on the screen somewhere, 44% of those were before the election.e 56% were after the election, where they obviously had no chance of influencing the election, and the amount of money that the russians spent in some key states because as you know in the indictment, talks about how the russians became sophisticated, they learned what

purple states were -- >> sean: ominous. >> they were directing there efforts, and a state of pennsylvania, according to facebook, they spent $300. in michigan, they spent $823, and in wisconsin, they spent $1,979. the problem was, all but $54 of that was before the primary. not in the general election. so all of that is testimony that we had before congress that is really relevant to the indictment. >> sean: facts and context, they mean an awful lot, except it doesn't fit a median narrative. great reporting on your part. let me go back to you, sebastian. this is now what goes to the heart of this it for me. everybody so sanctimoniously and in their pompous arrogance talks about this russian influence. okay. we can't talk about russian influence and ignore uranium on uranium one. we can't talke. about russian influence and ignore the

hillary clinton bought and paidv for russian government dossier, can we? >> [laughs] we have got to stick to the facts of the matter. the opposition research file that hillary and the dnc paid more than $12 million for, one file was used to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant against anin american national during a presidential campaign. that is the enormity. it makes watergate pale by comparison. it's a massive scandal. >> sean: last word, byron. >> i think we will just i see me and more information about this. as a matter of fact, we will see the house intelligence committee asking for more information from a variety of current and former officials about what did they know about this dossier, when did they first hear about it, when did they first learned that it was a supported and bankrolled by the hillary clinton campaign in the dnc?

these are very basic questions and we still don't know the answers. >> sean: your reporting has stood very much independent and apart from the herd, if you will, of those that live in the media bubble. thank you, both. we appreciate it. when we come back, rush limbaugh on what the russia probe is really all about. you don't want to miss this next. ♪

>> sean: rush limbaugh sat down with an interviewer on fox news sunday yesterday where he had some very strong words about this russian probe and what he believes is the real reason for this. take ada watch. >> i think this is all politics and, chris, it hasn't changed from the get-go. it is about protecting hillary and obama. obama is a primary person beingd

protected because all of this spying and collusionon to destry trump happened with his knowledge and probably encouragement. and the reason hillary isn't charged is because that would mean obama would have to be exposed asbe participating in ts scheme, too. >> sean: dead on. former secrets service agent, dan bongino and darrell park joins us. russian involvement of united states, does that bother you? >> of course it bothers me. >> sean: does it bother you that hillary's campaign and the dnc paid $20 million for what it turned out to be rationalized to manipulate the american people before an election? does that bother you? >> if that's true but i don't think it's true. i really don't think it'ss true. >> sean: the russian dossier filled with lies about donald trump. that was never verified. it was used for a fisa warrant. does that w part of the russian interference bother you, that

she paid the russian government sources for those lies? does that bother you? >> is not the issue whether it bothers me. the issue is the indictment -- >> sean: i'm trying to find consistency. does it bother you that hillary clinton, barack obama's administration, that we knew putin had operatives in america? doesn't bother you that putin and his hostile regime got 20% of the uranium rights in america and that the clintons got a lot of money in their coffers? should we be concerned about that russian interference? doesfe that bother you? >> i think -- what is the connection to the clintons and the uranium money. you haven't shown that yet. >> sean: bill clinton doubled his speaking fees and all the people involved in the deal kicked back money to the clinton foundation. dan bongino. >> it's coincidental, by the way, that much of the peoplet involved in the uranium one deal if there were paid massive speaking fees and also president clinton pays a trip to gaza ask dan as a deal for that,

it takes place with a who later donates a large swath of his proceeds to the clinton foundation. the hypocrisy is fascinating. we know the source of the dossier was the russians and the clinton campaign. nobody is bothered by that at all yet it this case of a fairy tale russian collusion with the trumpmp team, no one cn show you who the polluters are or how the collusion happened. >> sean: isn't it interesting at the bank that is paying clinton and is connected to russia, the nuclear group they have there, isn't it interesting they doubled bill clinton's speaking fee for that speech at that very critical time? that doesn't seem fishy to you? is it not seem fishy to you that all the people involved in that deal in canada, all these other people, that they were throwing money at the clinton foundation and they needed hillary to sign off on that deal that gave

uranium one, 20% of our uranium control to putin? >> i think you gotta be careful, sean. >> sean: what do i have to be careful about? i'm telling the truth. >> the problem are the connections that mueller's finding between the trump administration and russia. >> sean:th you only care about -- i think what i'm hearing is you only care about trump and russia. you have any evidence that you can tell dan bongino tonight -- any evidence, proof that all of trump-russia collusion? it's been a year of of the hou. give me the evidence. what is it? >> 37 pages of the indictment tells all the story we need to hear. it speaks for itself. >> daryl, where in the indictment is a point to anyone who wittingly colluded? wittingly means knowingly. where does it show that? as a matter of fact, if you read line 53 -- are you a lawyer? if you read line 53 indictment that said they supported groups,

one of whom was called support hillary, save american muslims. did you see that? is line 53. >> i think the indictment lays out to russia supported. that is what it does. >> through a support hillary group. did you read the indictment? >>pe i read all 37 pages. >> wow, you must have managed to line 53 where it's at a support hillary, save american muslims. did you see that one? >> i think without question for those people who read the document -- >> you keep saying that but you must not have read it. >> support hillary, save american muslims pray that is in the indictment, what you didn't read it and you said you did. nice work, though. >> i did. >> you missed line 53. go check it out and come back. >> you got to read the whole document. >> [laughs] are we in bizarro land? is an indictment on national television. you think i'm making this up? look it up. >> sean: you want to have a bet on this?

>> [laughs] i don't want to take his money. >> sean: if after 18 months you can't give me evidence of trump-russia collusion, can you? >> you got to be careful. you use the word collusion -- >> sean: that is what they are -- that is with the media has been telling us. give us any evidence you got. >> you got to be clear. collusion is not a legal term that would fit the situation. >> sean: the bottom line is you have none. you don't have any. >> he wants a legal investigation. >> sean: our video of the day, the hannity hotline, we'll wrap things up coming. they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale

go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again

go to stamps.com/tv and never go to - chris domine is a husband, father, and athlete because a kidney transplant gave him a second chance at life, made possible by an organ donor. imagine what you could make possible. learn more and sign up as a donor. go to organdonor.gov. >> sean: time for a video of the day. when you book a cruise for a family vacation you expect sun and fun and assuming, some tropical drinks. but you probably don't expect a massive brawl to break out because that's exactly what happened on board a cruise ship in the pacific last week. according to the witnesses, the

massive fight, which banned on and off for over three days, what are they doing? involved 23 people and guess what? they were all reportedly from the same family. finally after three days of chaos, the cruise stopped early in australia and police had to remove all 23. [laughs] you can't make this up. oh, time for the hotline. let's see what you got.

>> sean: thank you. by the way, i started as a dishwasher then cooked, then busboy, then bartender, then construction worker. we will always be fair and balanced. let not your heart be troubled. we will always be fair and balanced. call us, 877-225-8587. katie pavlich standing by tonight. good to see you. friends and see pac this week. >> katie: see you there down in d.c. welcome to "the ingraham angle" from new york, i'm katie pavlich into the night for laura, who is all for the holiday. a terrific show for you this evening, and the pressure is mounting on the fbi to explain how it failed to prevent last week's florida school massacre. president trump lays into former president obama for failing to stop russian election meddling. plus, political hackery meets presidential history. so-called experts in "the new york times" say trump isn't just bad, he's the worst president ever. but first, the fallout from the shooting