change this is you either have inside reform, where suddenly they are making decisions about its values and ethics, or you do it by disrupting. >> sean: i will be in the alps, unavailable. thank you. good night from washington. here's sean. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." we are following six major breaking news stories tonight. a great one, mark levine, tomi lahren, reince priebus will be here. a massive development. the fbi may have in fact broken the law and violated their own protocol when getting a fisa were introduced spy on carter page. this according to a brand-new letter out tonight from the house intelligence committee chairman devin nunes. also tonight, the important questions are being asked. we should have answers very soon. also tonight, trump-russia collusion crusader adam shifts, he is admitting, we have the tape, he has seen no evidence that this collision exists.

former clinton advisors says robert mueller is way beyond his mandate. it is proof that the investigation has been and continues to be a witch hunt? also breaking right now, vladimir putin, he is in failing nuclear he claims that can avoid detection. we look slain by the liberal media, democrats, hillary clinton, are all to blame. the liberal mayor of oakland, california, under fire for aiding and abetting criminal illegal immigrants. he's actually warning them about federal i.c.e. raids. it is the mayor putting law enforcement and american lives in danger? the short answer, yes. also, fox news reporting that the commanding officer during the florida school shooting ordered some deputies on the scene not to enter the school. this answers a ton of questions. a lot of breaking news. we get started in the breaking news opening monologue. ♪ these are massive and huge breaking developments tonight

about what is severe obama era fisa abuses. this letter just released tonight to the attorney general jeff sessions, the house and talk chair, devin nunes, violated the law when surveillig trump campaign associate carter page. in this letter, nunes points out specific doj guidelines when it comes to fisa surveillance. he writes, "under this subsection fisa verification and accuracy procedures, the fbi itself acknowledges this importance, the accuracy of information contained within fisa applications is of the utmost importance, only documented and verified information may be used to support fbi applications, fisa warrants, to the courts. given this new information, chairman nunes is now demanding the doj explain if, in fact, these particles are in place. we know the answer.

they never verified this. if they are, the chairman wants to know how officials will be punished for violating this law, lying to a fisa judge. not following protocol. this letter also points out how using this false information in a fisa court could violate several laws. look at them on the screen. 18 usc 242. using color of law to contact t and investigation. then you have surveillance conducted under color of law in a manner not authorized by a fisa conspiracy, construction of justice, contempt of court. the scandal is getting bigger and bigger, unlike an abuse of power we have seen in the history of this country. that is why we are on peeling layer of the layer this onion. the great one, mark levine, jason chaffetz, sara carter, gregg jarrett, they will all

have reaction. the democrats trump-russia collusion is a total farce. democratic congressman adam schiff, the ranking member of the house and talk committee come a long time professional trump hater, he's now admitting that this gary, damning, earth shattering information that he's been playing up for a year is already in the public domain. really? wears it. watch this. >> you said that you had more than circumstantial evidence of treasonous collusion with russia. what specifically were you referring to and please be specific because of its true, i do believe americans have the right to know a year later what that is. >> well, i certainly said there is ample evidence. i've never used the word treason, only steve bannon used that word. but if you look at the facts that are already in the public domain, they are pretty damning. >> is it enough for mueller to bring charges? >> this is a very important

question. that is, what is mueller's drop in what is our job. bob mueller will make the decision whether there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt to indict and convict people. it is not his responsibility to help the country what happened. >> sean: amazing job, meghan mccain. the translation: adam schiff is accusing trump of collusion with little more than speculation, rumor, and a phony russian dossier that was never corroborated or verified. do you see how severe this is? we may well find out in coming weeks or months that his constant anti-trump five alarm fire is has been nothing more than political hyperbole meant to damage a sitting president that you voted for so he could win favor with his liberal base and get hired by conspiracy tv msnbc. it's probably why according to the rnc, schiff has appeared on television 227 times since president trump's inauguration. it's only a matter of time

before nbc hires in. maybe he will take over for matt lauer, who's been out for a while. also brand-new, robert mueller now facing criticism from somebody who has intimate knowledge of special counsel investigations, kenneth starr, you might your member, independent counsel responsible for investigating bill clinton any '90s. he is saying that mueller might be crossing the line. watch this. >> bob mueller looking into trump's business dealing before 2016 to see if they were potential opportunity for exertion of influence by russia, any kind of actors on my part, fair point? >> i think it is beyond his mandate. the mandate is what happened during the 20 2016 election in terms of collusion. i think the indictment almost two weeks ago of the 13 russian nationals and the three companies suggests there was no collusion.

my sense would be, but i don't have all the facts, bob, i love you, but let's just stay focused on what the issue is, and that is collusion in the campaign. >> sean: he went on to explain that while mueller's investigation must remain narrowly focused, it's up to the deputy attorney general. he's right, rod rosenstein, who is overseeing this case, to keep mueller on task. remember, this whole witch hunt was supposed to only be about trump-russia collusion. that evidence does not exist. all of this time. speaking of russia, think about this. with all of this talk, we have another major breaking news story tonight, and that is the russian president, the bad actor, vladimir putin. that's right, the guy that obama said wasn't a bad actor. tell vladimir all have more possibility after the election. he's claiming he is brand-new nuclear weapons that can penetrate america's defenses. putin made the announcement during a state of the nation speech. he detailed how these new weapons literally including

nuclear power cruise missile into new hypersonic muscle antinuclear power underwater drone. u.s. officials are casting a lot of doubt on his comments, saying that his new cruise missile is still in the test phase and has crashed a few times. okay. here's my point. the liberal media and the democrats obsessing, totally obsessed over a conspiracy theory, trump-russia collusion, even though we have zero evidence. putin, every single day, as we are doing this, is getting stronger. and the left and the media are literally playing right into putin and rush's hands. putin's entire goal, what is that? to sow political discord in america. that exactly with the media is doing by going down the russia collusion rabbit holes no evidence. then there is barack obama and hillary clinton. remember obama, mocking mitt romney for daring to call russia a threat and then ignore specific threats in 2014 from devin nunes and others on the

house until committee? he told president trump, stop whining about the election, election interference, days before the election. hillary clinton stupidly, we remember the silly reset button? she will reset relations with russia? and she helped to prove, giving russia and putin control of 20% of the uranium. then she paid for the russian dossier filled with russian government lies. great job, media and democrats. you've done a great job dividing the country and lying to the american people without evidence and pushing baseless conspiracy theories because you hate donald trump and vladimir putin is getting stronger. we have more breaking news tonight. the story is outrageous. the department of justice is trying to determine if the mayor of oakland, if she literally obstructed justice, warning criminal illegal immigrants about i.c.e. raids. this liberal mirror, she took to twitter on saturday and to alter illegal immigrants and worn them

that federal immigration authorities are preparing to conduct operations. that acting head of i.c.e. is blasting her, saying that her stunt allowed 800 criminal illegal immigrants to avoid arrest, and he also said this on "fox and friends" this morning. >> but she did is no better than a gang look out yelling "when a police cruiser comes in the neighborhood except she did it to the entire community. it's beyond the pale. i've been doing this for 34 years and this is a whole new low to intentionally warn criminals that law enforcement is coming. being a law enforcement officer is already dangerous enough, but to give the criminals a heads up that we are coming in the next 24 hours, increases at risk, the american heroes defend this nation, and to tell the criminals we are coming, it's incredible. >> sean: beyond incredible. the mayor of oakland is aiding and abetting criminal illegal immigrants and of course, she is defending her actions, writing on twitter, not talking about

the consequences, "i don't regret sharing this information. it is oakland's legal right to be a sanctuary city and we have not broken any laws. we believe our community is safer when families stay together. okay. they did break laws. we have laws on the books. it's pathetic. with the mayor is not saying unclearly obviously doesn't realize or care, is that not only is she putting immigration authorities' lives at risk, she is doing the same thing for american citizens in her community. i.c.e. is saying, all they are trying to do is get the bad people off the streets. guess what? if any of the criminal illegal immigrants should have been detained commit a crime, then the blood will be on her hands. literally, she will be responsible for whatever happens. she owns this. we have a major update tonight on the florida school shooting. fox news reporting the commanding officer, we are now confirming tonight, on the scene during the rampage, literally

ordered to some the first responder deputies to set up a perimeter instead of confronting and neutralizing this madman come, this gunman. this new piece of information is beyond stunning. the broward county sheriff's policy for dealing with active shooter situation success first responders may go into a building to save lives without permission. the policy does not appear to mention anything about setting up a perimeter. if that is the case, then the question is, why did at least four per hour broward county sheriff's deputies not to rush into the school like the neighboring community, coral gables officers to disable life? fox news is also reporting that there were delays in allowing emts to go inside the school. remember, we are talking about kids, literally, moments, precious seconds, save lives. we also know that there were dozens of missed warning signs prior to the shooting by the fbi and the broward county sheriff's office. this is one huge, massive, big

government bureaucratic failure at every level. the government failed the people of florida, and as we have been telling you, broward county sheriff scott israel is refusing to accept even an ounce of responsibility. he is also saying that he likely will not release video of how deputies responded, so that we come to you, the american people can see exactly what happened. shameful because a tragedy could have been prevented. back to the top story. joining us tonight, fox news contributor sara carter. fox news contributor jason chaffetz. fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. gregg, it's your night. this released letter by devin nunes tonight, when you are now questioning whether or not the fbi, not only followed protocol, but whether they broke the law. we will have an answer. you are demanding one within seven days. >> there is a set of guidelines, a book, relieve the bible for the fbi, they have to memorize

it. it says with a can and cannot do. on the one hand, when it comes to a criminal investigation, they cannot open it unless they have articulable basis for it. they have gone here, yet they opened the criminal probe of the trump campaign. the second is, and a counterintelligence probe, they have to submit evidence for surveillance warrants that it is corroborated and verified. again, it is in the dialogue. >> sean: don't we know it was never verified? in january, jim, he goes to trump tower and says, it's salacious, and it's not verifie verified. this is months earlier. he's now admitting months later it was never verified. >> that's right. >> sean: and using it is a violation of at least six diffey statutes. you notice on that devin nunes has pointed out, the ones that you and i were talking about, plus a couple of others.

he mentioned the abuse of power. i think perjury. false and misleading statements. fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. all of these are serious crimes punishable by five, ten years behind bars. if you deceive a court and conceal evidence from a judge in order to spy on americans, that is a whole set of problems. >> sean: this will come due. this is happening. congressman, let me go to you. then i'm going to bring sara in. we know that before the nunes memo, they waited until the very last day, and hours before the deadline to release the information, it then became the nunes memo. we know that rod rosenstein went in to speaker brian office, don't give the information that has been subpoenaed. i want to know, rod rosenstein, he had 70s to explain this, and i suspect he's not going to want to answer again, and he's a guy that appointed mueller. how should this be handled from

a legal standpoint when you have separation of powers, when you have oversight authority, as he once did? >> look at my devin nunes and trey gowdy and the crew is doing exactly the right thing, giving seven days, a very specific question, allow them to come up -- i'm proud of the fact that speaker brian is backing them in supporting. i would also encourage devin nunes to look for security clearance of their people. why do these people still have security clearances? you don't have a security clearance, you don't have a job. with these people, they are given great latitude, but the law and the guidance, as gregg pointed out, is very clear, and it looks as if it was clearly broken. >> sean: i want you to weigh in on all of this, but also the point that kenneth starr made earlier, an important point. he was accused of the same thing. going beyond the mandate of what the special counsel is. literally every day, i see and i believe my gut.

the special counsel, there is somebody in there that is leaking, because they don't like the fact that they are being covered and uncovered in the sense that, look at the people that robert mueller hired. so when kenneth starr says it's beyond the mandate, how far beyond the mandate have we gone here? >> i think we've gone extremely far beyond the mandate. remember kind of starr also argued that he was told by janet reno to go those perjury charges against president clinton. so his mandate was expanded by the attorney general at that time. i think that is important to note. would we have to ask ourselves here, is there one specific question -- i just want to go back to chairman nunes' letter -- that says when has the doj and the fbi done to bring these people to investigate them, or to bring charges against them, we want to know what is going on here. if you go to the special counse counsel, and you see the expansive nature of this special counsel, and you know here adam

schiff saying that basically there is no real evidence of collusion. it's all out there. it's speculative. we may never know. >> sean: what is out there? nobody can answer that. where is the collusion? what is it? >> there is no collusion. as of yet, there has been no proof whatsoever that president trump -- >> sean: listen, if he doesn't have that answer and he says is already out there, what is it? somebody needs to ask him as he goes on 272 shows auditioning to be the next rachel maddow or lawrence o'donnell. >> there is going to be charges. i believe right now chairman nunes, as well as senator grassley, our right over the target. i keep hearing this over and over again. this is going to need to be investigated. they are going to be answers to these questions. i am telling you, there will be answers to these questions. remember the inspector general's report is coming out, sean, and

that is going to reveal a lot. i think it is going to be very soon. it is supposed to be this month. i am hearing that it could still be possibly this month. they may extend it april but we don't know yet. >> sean: we need it sooner rather than later. gregg. >> here's the problem, in order to bring these people to justice, you have to have the department of justice prosecutors investigate and bring the case. jeff sessions, here's what -- he has no indication. >> sean: the inspector general's report comes out, then we get reports of possible crimes, then we hire -- then the doj lawyers will look at it, and then we will have a special counsel. >> it will start all over again. it is such a waste of time. >> sean: don't we have enough investigation that warrants the appointment of another special counsel to investigate the eight investigators? >> congress ask for it last jul july. jeff sessions has been utterly

in his responses. >> sean: jason chaffetz, should there be a second special counsel and do we have to wait for the ig then the doj attorney and then the special counsel? is that when mean know laws have been broken? we have irrefutable evidence at this point. >> you have an attorney general who is recused himself out of the very job. i've been saying for a few months, it is time for -- i'm sorry, jeff sessions is a good, honorable person. but he's not up to the job. he doesn't have the guts that needs to be done. you don't need a special counsel if you have an attorney general who can actually, you know, move the ball forward and do what he is supposed to do and administer justice but he is nowhere on this. if you will keep the attorney general, then go get a second special counsel. >> jeff sessions is not the attorney general. he's the ag in name only. it's being run by other people -- >> sean: rod rosenstein. >> largely rod rosenstein. sessions is kept out of the dark

come out of major decisions, he doesn't have a clue. i get that from people in the doj. >> i do, too. and so does sara. i wish we had more time. when we come back, reince priebus, also the great one, mark levan, will analyze all of the new information. stay with us. this news breaking addition of "hannity" continues. empowering. downright exhilarating. see for yourself why chevrolet is the most awarded and fastest growing brand, the last four years overall. switch into a new chevy now. current qualified competitive owners and lessees can get this 2018 chevy equinox for around $199 a month. chevrolet. find new roads.

>> she is fiercely loyal. she said perhaps problematically before the house com >> she's fiercely loyal, perhaps problematically, before the house committee yesterday. she tells white ladies on behalf of the president. i assume that she will continue to defend him and do what she can to protect him wherever she may be. >> it is up to all of us saying define whitefly, nonsubsidence. >> hope hicksit had elevated position with trump, and her loyalty helped garner that.

this is not a battle-testedhe person. >> things are about to get pretty ugly in the white house. the question is for hope hicks,o why did you stay that long? she's got to get ready for mueller, gotta get ready for trial. i mean, things could get ugly. >> sean: joe has lost his mind. the destroyed trump media,ng having their field day following yesterday's announcement that hope hicks was resigning as white house communications director. joining us now, he was thereus himself, former white house chief of staff reince priebus. first of all, all of these phony, overpaid so-called journalists, hypocrite colleagues that are lazy beyond belief. this is a white lie. the president would love to be on with the liberal joe. he's busy that day. meaning the president has no intention. or reince priebus, your tie actually looks great tonight when i really think your tie looks hideous. >> [laughs] >> sean: that is a whitefly.

>> this is part of what is driving money in the media. it's trump world, trashing trump. it is all part of what has been happening since day one with the president. you look at what it's like in the white house, you are working like a dog, getting destroyed in the press, many of these people are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on lawyers and you look at the results and they're good but you have to have to go to hell and back to s get there, sean. >> sean: the media will say, okay, donald trump is never going to be somebody that he's not. he's not going to be the president, the mainstream establishment present they wanted, they would've had that with hillary. he's his own man. if the president events or tweets that he's annoyed with something, is that how he makes

decisions or is it part of a process? >> that's just it. to the american people voted for a disrupter. what i was trying to explain to people all the time is that the media is obsessed with the decision-making process. who's in, who's out, who's up, who is down, a tweet of the day. but this is how a president makes decisions. he measures things out, he puts really smart people that might not agree with each other in the same room. what i always tell people, focus on the results. look at the results. remember four things. federal judges, neil gorsuch, isis, regulations, tax cuts. if you look at the results of what this president has accomplished, and you ignore the the palace intrigue, ignore the media wants to talk about that reallybo doesn't matter -- >> sean: energy independence -- >> you can't find a hole like that hasn't been accomplished.

>> sean: a 49 year low? here's what i want to ask you. >> look at the heritage foundation. >> sean: 65% -- ofe his agenda. >> the heritage foundation, they were no big pro trump organization when donald trump went on that escalator. it is not like they are trump cheerleaders making these numbers up. it is actually true. >> sean: adam schiff -- i thought meghan mccain destroyed him on "the view." we showed the clip. i a give her all the credit in e world. you did a phenomenal job. adam schiff -- "oh, it's all in the public arena now about trump-russia occlusion." i'm like, is there any evidence? have you ever seen anything? i haven't. >> i've never seen anything. i have been told by high-ranking

members of the fbi, as i've mentioned before, i want get into it again. they flat out told me that one of those articles, the original "new york times" article that apparently won and award the other day for journalism, was overstated, untrue, and many other things about it. these were people from the fbi that told me this. i've never seen it. i know the president hates it. he hates it watching it. >> sean: last question. just because the president bends as he's making a decision, i think i want to hire that person, what is the real process? does he do it when he says it? is a part of a process? >> listen, there is a process. there was a process when i was there, the same process that was followed by ronald reagan and bush 43. there is a principals committee, where major decisions are brought through with all of the principles of the white house,

major departments, general counsels, they all have a decision memo and hand presented to the president for a decision. now there are some things, though, that the american people understand that the president at times gets tired of waiting on. if he knows what he's going to do, about the issue in regard to state transgender in the military, he'll make a decision. he's been talking about steel tariffs since the 1980s. i may not be a big fan of steel tariffs but this is about president trump's agenda is all about. the staff is charged with executing the agenda of the president and the agenda of the president is i getting done and it's working for the american economy american economy. >> sean: reince priebus dominic, always good to see you. when we come back, the great one, our top story, yes, the fbi could have committed crimes and broken protocol. the great one, mark levine, response to all of that. that is straight's ahead. ♪

♪ >> sean: as we continue on as we reported in the opening monologue, the house until committee chair, devin nunes has sent a letter tonight to attorney general sessions that says the fisa surveillance application for carter page, campaign associate for the trump campaign appears to be a clear violation for fbi rules for submittinga evidence to the fisa court and may also violate criminal statutes. mark levin's legal foundation, the landmark legal foundation, has also filed a motion asking the fisa court to do something about the suspected abuses allegedly committed by the fbi and the doj. he's also the hostls come with w collie, we are proud to have him, that is "life, liberty, buy levin . "this nunes memo that i have here, that the fbi could have

committed crimes, and that they brokelr protocol, don't we alrey know, when you don't tell a fisa judge, and your initial and subsequent applications, that hillary bought and paid for the dossier and it was never verified, and the law specifically says to verify it. don't we know they violated a law? mark levin? constitutional scholar? >> you know, sean hannity, let me tell you something. the judges on the fisa court so far have gotten away with helping scrutinize. if you are a federal judge, forget about the fisa court, federal district judge, appellatepr court, supreme cour, and you know as a matter of fact that you were misled, i want everyone to listen to this, you know as a matter fact that the information that was provided to you or the information that wasn't provided to you, led you to issue a warrant to spy on an american citizen under the idea that the american citizen was an

agent of russia who was likely to commit a crime, and by the way, that citizen, carter page, last time i checked, he hasn't been charged with anything. if you are a judge, and we've had to successive judges in this fisa court over a period of one year, and you don't do something about it, congress needs to look into this! i do not expect the department of justice to investigate the department of justice. i just don't. i don't expect the fbi to investigate the fbi. but i well expect federal judges serving as fisa judges to make sure that conduct wasn't committed in front of them. let me tell you something. last april, landmark legal foundation filed secretly with the fisa court because we don't have any -- nobody has standing. nobody reallyws knows how this works. we said to the court, hey, court, hey, judge, guessed what just a placek in your court roo. here's what we said.

you have the inherent jurisdiction to order an investigation ofio the fbi to gt answers to this. number one, last april, half this court's order or orders been used by intelligent and law enforcement entities of the federal government, as the subterfuge to derail private citizens and at least one united states senator, we were thinking of sessions at the time, for politicalss purposes? number two. that g government officials seek one or more national security warrants from this court as a pretext to conduct an investigation for the purpose of effecting an ongoing national presidential campaign and subsequent transition of an incoming president. last april. number three, when applying to this court for one or more warrants in this matter, did the fbi inform this court that it apparently paid the expenses of a former british spy who prepared the dossier, reportedly relied on, in its application to

convince this court to issue a warrant? number four. when applying to this court, to the judge, for one or more warrants in this matter, did the fbi inform this court that the dossier is reportedly presented, if pursued one hour more warrants, had originally been prepared by the former british spy for a washington research firm conducting opposition research against the republican nominee for president of president of the united states, donald j. trump. this is important. landmark legal foundation riff respectfully requests the court, the judge, the fisa judge, sitting by herself, that she should direct the government to complete its investigation and report its findings to the court within 90 days. the court should also consider whether it's appropriate to issue in order to all relevant federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to show cause as to why they should not be held in contempt for failing

to protect the secrecy of classified information obtained pursuant to the court orders. do you know what the judge said in response? i want you to y listen. april 25th, 2017. this is rosemary collyer, the presiding judge. they are picked by the chief justice of the supreme court, district court judges for the most part. they are existing federal court judges. she wrote in this little order, the court has received a pleading titled motion for leave to appear as -- on april 20th -- >> sean: explained that. >> she says, although presented as a request to appear, there is no matter pending before the court with respect to which such an appearance would be proper. listen to me. this warrant was extended three times.nt that matter was still appearing before this court. that's number one. number two.

the court has ongoing jurisdiction to supervise the conduct of attorneys, the fbi, the justice department, beforeay the court. contempt may reach backwards, even after a case has been concluded. in other words, this fisa judge, quite frankly, wasas misdirectig when she said the matter was not before them anymore when it was still before them and thishe court, like any federal court, still has the power to reach back and hold people accountable. she did nothing. she did not call in the fbi as far as we know. she did not d call in the justie department. she did not ask for answers. she did not ask for an investigation, she didn't call a contempt hearing, nothing. you know what that tells me? something smells likee a rat, which means this -- >> sean: let me ask youk this. this is all great information. mark, this is how i see this. remember the grassley-graham memo? they said the bulk of the fisa

application consisted of what we now know to be on verified information. fusion gps, cofounder glenn simpson, never verified it. the fbi, never verified. the deputy fbi director andrew mccabe literally said, non. dossier, not even an application. you're right. it's renewed. every 90 days. if you have an opposition party candidate using on verified russian lies in the lead up and postelection to undermine the president, and what we know as of now is none of it is true, is this based on your knowledge of history, at least the biggest abuse of power and corruption in your lifetime? to me, this is watergate -- are you kidding? this is watergate times a thousand me.e. >> when you when i spoke way back in march of last year, and we laid this out, we were called

kooks, conspiracies, conspiracy theorists -- we didn't have a lot, we are pulling it together, and i was focused on the fisa court because there were leaps about the fisa court. i want to underscore something tonight, shawn, and it is this. these federal judges sitting on the fisa court act like they have no role in this. >> sean: baloney. t >> they were abused, the court was abused, misled, people should be held to account. they read the newspaper is not, they watch television now, we presented this judge with the it!ence and filed congress needs to find out now why these judges, even today, aren't holding these people accountable! >> sean: remember, comey said to trump in january of 2017 at trump tower, oh, it's salacious and it's on verified. the fisa application, the first one, was three months earlier. he, by his own words, is

admitting he violated, as gregg jarrett said earlier, these are felonies, mark. you don't fly before a judge, nor do you -- >> i'm talking about a court needs to protect itself. >> sean: agreed. >> any federal court in america, if somebody lies to a court, omits material facts to a court, information is not presented to the court, a court misled, federal judges every day, they hold people to account! these judges in the fisa court have not! let me just say this quickly! it is time to abolish the fisa court! is time to create a new counterintelligence related court! itrt should not consist of existing federal judges!ho they should be confirmed! not for life terms! the fbi and the justice department, when they go into that court, should not be alone anymore! there ought toht be in office within the federal government that is there to ensure that civil liberties are protected! there are things we need to do

with this court right now! >> sean: life, liberty, levin, sunday night, 10:00 eastern. who is your guest? >> we have a full hour with chairman nunes. >> sean: i loved waffle williams this past weekend. number one in the ratings, awesome job. great fun. good to see you. when we come back, tomi lahren, you don't want to miss that. we will get into the oakland mayor. this is unbelievable. putting people's lives at risk for a law♪ enforcement, straight ahead. ♪ my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

>> sean: joining us with >> sean: joining us now with more on the outrageous story, this oakland mayor warning residents beforehand that i.c.e. agents were targeting illegal

immigrants. joining us now fox news contributor tomi lahren. from catalinam magazine, do you believe in the rule of law? >> of course i do. >> sean:t federal law says that you are not allowed to enter a country illegally. >> right. >> sean: especially in the case of criminal aliens that committed crimes, do you think it's a good thing that the oakland mayor, that she warns criminal aliens in some cases -- oh, i.c.e. is coming -- >> i wouldn't say she is warning criminal aliens. a >> sean: she warned them. >> i wouldn't call themin criminals or aliens. i would say they are undocumented immigrants. >> sean:ra forget the wordsmithing. >> taxpaying family members -- >> sean: did they break themu law? when they enter the country, they are not breaking laws. when they enter the country

illegally, by not going through the normal process, is that illegal, yes or no? >> i'm not saying the entered illegally. they may have at a work visa, they may have been invited in by a company and they decided -- >> sean: what about the people that are here illegally. you are being stubborn. >> i'm a not being -- >> sean: are there people here illegally? some people enter this country -- >> sean: is that illegal? >> it may be frowned upon. undocumented. >> sean: this is the party -- it all depends on the meaning of the word. i can't handle this. it's obviously illegal. the thing that bothers me, tomi, thatat mayor is putting law enforcement lives in jeopardy by giving them a heads up. >> not only law enforcement, but american lives, residents of oakland, their lives are on the line. the democrats talk time and time again about not wanting to break

up families.ie i would ask them, what about the families of kate steinle, killed by illegal immigrants? what about them? today matter? you are putting a lot of lives on the line. this may or,r, if one of those illegal immigrants goes out and harms someone or kills someone, she has blood on her hands. i hopefully she sleeps well at night. >> violent crimes have gone down -- >> sean: k answer the question about kate steinle! >> there are so many people that have died at the hands of non-hispanic, white men in this country. c let's deport all white men. >> sean: would kate steinle be alive if there wasn't an illegal immigrant that we knew was in my country -- >> would millions of people be alive if we didn't have white men committing these -- let's department. >> sean: tomi. >> wait, wait. illegal immigrants have no legal right to be here, and know you are changing the argument that wein should deport white americm men because they commit crimes?

let's talk about that. illegal immigrants have no legal right to be here. >> they pay taxes, they are contributing to this country. >> what happens one of these individuals doesn't contribute? what happens if they harm someone? >> there is always a bad apple. let's get rid of every contributor in our community, every person that is with theer family, helping the children, every hard worker because of one bad apple? >> sean: my blood pressure is going up. >> laws matter. >> and the mayor knows her city. >> sean: checkmate, tomi lahren on this one. we have the video of the day in the hannity hotline straight ahead. ♪ to wait for the future.

i destroy brain tumors with nanoparticles. i see breast cancer others can't. i create a biotech revolution with smart cancer drugs. i speed life-saving discoveries to life. i am the miracle of science with soul. and i live in city of hope.

>> sean: so earlier today on "the view" condoleezza rice delivered a very >> sean: earlier today and "the view, condoleezza rice delivered a simple but powerful message to adam schiff, who has spent monthss and months making his grandiose claims about trump-russia collusion.

watch this. >> i spent a lot of time in washington, and i know you've got a really hard drop and i appreciate what you're doing for the country but i really hope we can wrap it up. the country needs to get back to business. that is my greatest hope. >> sean: he admitted, we don't have any evidence. time for the hannity hotline. take a a listen. >> sean: [laughs] i can't, laura ingraham has the slot. she took it for s me.

this is the first night, all the calls were nice. you want to sound off? like me, hate me, doesn't matter. "the ingraham angle" ." 877-225-8587. we are fair and balanced. we are not the destroyed terms of media. where does, laura ingraham? in. we already know she can beat you in tennis badly. that sounded, that voice, sounds a little bit like you, hannity. that's really bad when your family has to call. in. >> sean: you are so mean. all i am is nice to you and every night we come on, you are so mean to me. i don't understand. be mean to the liberals and the corrupt media. >> laura: i have a question. do you have like a big basket like a big baby basket business kerr basket with footballs in it and sign it with all your fans and give them to them. do you do that like sit there all day. >> sean: all i can say is pay back is coming. it's coming.