him. tell us what you think. in the meantime, most watched, most trusted. have a great weekend. good evening from washington. i'm shannon bream. >>good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. a pretty sad story tonight. one person is dead. the alleged killer may soon be roaming the streets free because members of the democratic party are starting to believe that illegal aliens have more rights than american citizens. look at this picture. this is ivan zamarripa-castenada. there is a tattoo on his face. but that's not the problem. first, he's an illegal alien. second, over the weekend in

denver, he got drunk and slammed into a semitruck. rather than stay at the scene, he fled the scene. now he faces charges of vehicular homicide. and then politics got involved. federal authorities have asked denver to detain this man so he can be arrested on federal charges and deported backs to mexico. but they can't because denver is a sanctuary city. and that means democratic politicians there are protecting the loose killer even if it means he's loose in denver. if he posts a bond, he will be free to go until his court date. that's if he shows up to court. why would he? he snuck into this country. they believe illegal aliens accused of murder deserve to be

protected from you more than you deserve to be protected from them. they're ignore and undermine federal law on his behalf. would they do that for you? i don't think so. attorney general jeff sessions has filed suit to stop insanity like this. they're suing california,i . democratics in california are outraging by what the attorney general has done. they're calling him the real criminal. watch. >> what sessions said is simple not true and i call upon him to apologize to the people of california for trying to insert discord and division. >> how dare you vilify members of our community by trying to

frighten the american public by thinking that all undocumented residents are dangerous criminals? >> how dare you? this is how the left has begun to think. if you believed accused murderers shouldn't be in this country and should go back to their own countries, you're the one out of line. if you believe in borders, you're a monster. this isn't you're country. >> thanks for coming on. >> thank you. >> so this is -- i think it's fair to say an emergency. in a city government is making it possible for an accused killer to come through simply because they're morally opposed to federal immigration law, that's setting up a conflict. >> american people have got to speak first and foremost to these governmental leaders. it's unacceptable to take this case in denver that you just cited where the individual will be released from jail. i.c.e. officers are not going to stop looking for him.

they'll go out to find him. they'll be at greater risk to try to make an arrest there when they could have been safely picked up in the custody of the denver authorities. so this situation is very, very serious and it represents a commitment from the hard left, these activists groups, to open borders in non-legal enforcement of immigration. it cannot be the policy of the united states of america. >> some say the states are not obligated to carry out federal law. but then others, including the mayor of oakland, have gone farther and actively tried to subvert federal law by warning people that federal agents were coming. does that constitute obstruction of justice and should she be prosecuted for that? >> we're looking at that. they're keeping us posted on what's really happening there. those kind of things depend on the law and the facts and we'll

evaluate them at the department of justice. but this is a radical ideology. it's contrary to the american law. the supreme law of the land is american immigration law. and it must be enforced. >> well, we have open borders in effect in a lot of ways. now we're getting something that looks like insurrection in a lot of ways. the biggest state saying we're going to actively work to undermine federal law. >> i think this is an extreme act. when i was in california, i heard countless people tell me they were embarrassed and outraged about what was going on. i think these people have just been able to get away with it, not been challenged, not been challenged intellectually as to the meaning of what they're doing, how radical it is, how unacceptable it is, how it places the lives of american police officers and i.c.e. officers at greatest risk, as

well as our communities at greater risks because we keep criminals in the country that are due to the deported. >> do you see how if you're looking on as an observer of this, it does seem like the federal government is toothless in the face of this challenge? with impunity, it does seem like the mayor of oakland has more power than the feds. >> well, tucker, we want to use every lawful tool we have to push back against this activity. you can be sure of that. i will say, however, that ultimately, in this country, the american people have the final word. and they have got to analyze what their leaders are doing. and if they're promoting these kind of unlawful, unwise, and dangerous policies, they need to be held to account. and when the political needle starts moving, i think you'll see politicians start changing. >> the attorney general you

replaced, one attorney general before that, eric holder, has endorsed this. do you think it's odd that a former chief law enforcement officer in the country would be endorsing ignoring federal law? >> he's being hired by the state, paid a legal fee to represent the state of california. but i totally believe that this policy that they are defending in california is unwise and in many places clearly illegal. and we're going to challenge its legality and wisdom and we're going to defend federal law officers and state law officers out there trying to do their duty every day and are being placed at much greater risk because they won't even let the police talk to the federal officers who are the only ones that can actually deport a criminal alien. >> just to switch gears, i think a lot of our viewers have lost confidence in law enforcement because they think they've been used for political purposes to spy on americans

without real cause. and carter page would be at the top of that list. don't you think it would go a long way to restoring confidence in those agencies if the rest of us had some sense about the fisa warrants on carter page. >> it's my responsibility to make sure it's carried out law fully and with integrity. they're going to work on this and get to the bottom of it. >> but could we see -- there's so much lying about this from partisan lying. maybe from both sides, i know from one. about why the court granted the government the right to spy on this american citizen. wouldn't it dispel the myths if we could see the basis for it? >> well, we've never produced publicly the fisa warrants.

but i have to tell you, we've produced more documents, in this case, more information to the congress and to the public than i think any attorney general's office in history has. we're going to go as far as we can go to make things public and we're going to ensure that -- >>so you don't think we need a special prosecutor to look into this. >> it could be one day that a special prosecutor would be required. but we'll look at this with attorneys and within the inspector general's office. >> you're giving a speech tomorrow essentially about the rule of law to the federalist society. and it raised a question in my mind about judges. shouldn't the congress act as a counterbalance against judicial overreach? if there's a judge clearly not consulting the constitution and making law, why wouldn't the congress try to balance that out. >> it's gotten to the point

where congress has been too willing to cede its powers. when i'm finding single judges, 1 out of 600 issue as executive order, a court injunction against executive orders of the executive branch of the united states, it may take 18 months to get them back to the supreme court. it is disrupting the ability of this government to function. and i'm really concerned about it. it's time for the nation to reconsider these injunctions. >> that's not democracy. that's a monarchy or something. thank you for joining. i appreciate it. well, reyes is an attorney and a columnist. thanks for coming on.

let's talk specifics about denver right now. an illegal alien has been charged with vehicular homicide. and for idea logical reasons, the city is saying if he posts bail, he's going to walk free. hard to see how anybody could support something like that. why wouldn't we deport someone who's been credibly accused of murder? >> the problem here is that i.c.e. did not issue a warrant for this individual. they issued a detainer. in colorado, they issue between 35,000 and 40,000 detainers a day. they say they don't have the time to fill out the paperwork to fill out the additional request involved with a warrant. that's the problem. >> oh, okay. so i guess if someone's accused

of homicide, that would put them right at the top of the priority list. >> absolutely. >> and the people in charge in denver are saying his rights are more important than those of american citizens who live in denver who will be exposed to this guy when he walks out of jail after posting bail. who's looking out for their rights? >> i think our constitution is looking out for their rights. and the fact is all people, including the undocumented, do have certain rights under our constitution. most specifically, i think the mendoza case that says these local jurisdictions will be at risk of a liability for double jeopardy if they pull someone for a second time. >> that's -- we both know -- and i just want our audience to know, what you're saying is disingenuous. it has nothing to do with their

fealty to supreme court decisions. those are a joke to the left, as you know. are you actually arguing that the federal government has no right to take someone into custody when they know for a fact that he is breaking federal immigration law? >> they have the right to take people into custody, provided they follow the proper procedure. and their statute in this instance requires that they fill out the forms for a warrant. they did not do that. they only issued the detainer and that's why he was released. >> you're wrong. let me say that. this has been going on for a long time in precisely the way i described this. it's been thwarted by politicians who want votes. >> they don't want the financial liability. >> does it bother you that a

guy credibly accused of homicide is going to walk out when he shouldn't have been here in the first place? >> of course it does, sure. i also trust that they're following the processes prescribed by law. they do not want to face lawsuits from these different individuals. they don't want lawsuits of advocacy groups. >> whatever. >> why wouldn't the denver sheriff's department call i.c.e. and say, he's getting out now. he's walking out the front door. grab him. which they're allowed to do. >> they did not do it because i.c.e. did not issue a warrant. >> there's no difference. i.c.e. does not need a warrant to pick that guy up off the street. sorry, you're wrong. >> we're talking about two separate things. you are correct. they don't need a warrant to pick someone up. >> i know i'm correct.

if you really care -- >>beyond the prescribed term. >> let me ask one last question and then i'll let you go. if you really cared about the safety of american citizens in denver, which the left doesn't care about, but let's say you did for the sake of argument, why wouldn't you if you're the denver sheriff's office, call and say, "this guy's leaving at this hour. be waiting for them." why wouldn't they do that? >> they issue on a weekly basis between 35,000 and 40,000 of these detainers. >> why wouldn't they do it in this specific case? >> the reason they did not was because, again, i.c.e. did not make him a priority by failing to get the warrant for it. >> they don't need a warrant to -- okay. now you're being disingenuous. >> that's based on the men doe

as a case. >> they're not doing it because they don't care. thank you. >> thank you, sir. >> there's a hostage situation taking place at the nation's largest veterans home. police have locked down the facility. they're attempting to negotiate at this hour with the attacker. so far we don't know anything about the motive or the identity of the suspect. obviously, we'll follow this story as it continues to evolve and bring you details. president trump heading to unexpected summit with the leader of north korea. make that the dear leader. many in the press are racketing with consternation. hmm, does this deserve more credit than it's getting? the people criticizing it the same geniuses who made mistakes and never admitted it? interesting question. we'll get to it after we come back.

hey, what are you guys doing here? we're voya. we stay with you to and through retirement. so you'll still be here to help me make smart choices? well, with your finances that is. we had nothing to do with that tie. voya. helping you to and through retirement.

aah! ...i would have said you were crazy. but so began the year of me. i discovered the true meaning of paperless discounts... and the indescribable rush of saving drivers an average of $620. why does fear feel so good? i fell in love three times -- once with a woman, once with a country, and finally... with myself. -so, do you have anything to declare or not? -isn't that what i'm doing?

-so, do you have anything to declare or not? you know what's not awesome? gig-speed internet. when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids, and these guys,

him, ah. oh hello. that lady, these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them. uh huh, sure. still yes! xfinity delivers gig speed to more homes than anyone. now you can get it, too. welcome to the party. >>well, in a pretty unexpected twist, the president's decision to ridicule the leader of north korea as little rocket man turns out to be kind of working out. north korea has proposed a face to face meeting between the leaders. if it happens, it'll be the first ever summit between the sitting american president and dictator from north korea. in response, a lot of our foreign policy geniuses melted down. >> i think it's a dangerous gamble and a bad idea and in some ways i can't believe i'm saying that because for years i've been arguing that we need

direct talks between the u.s. and north korea. >> i'm in more of the "you must be kidding" camp. we've just given kim jong-un something for nothing. >> it was a breathtaking gamble, accordingly to one report. do you agree? >>i do. it is a roll of the nuclear dice. >> thanks for coming on. >> thank you for having me. >> i'll be honest. i have no idea what this will lead to, if anything. you can see it going wrong or taking unexpected and positive directions. who knows? what i know for certain is that almost everybody you just saw on tv is dumb, has a long track record of -- >>one of them is my best friend actually. >> i'm sure. every one has foreign policy disasters. why are we still listening to these people? >> well, i think it was

surprising everybody. and i think president trump that definitely has an i told you so in him. but i think he has a fair number of people who work for him to say i told you say. i don't think they saw this coming or thought that the language last year, the tweets were a good thing. so what he did he did instinctively on his own to the extent that the establishment got it wrong, if they got it wrong. we'll see. but it's nonpartisan. people just -- >>i totally agree with you. >> and i happen to -- i've always thought, when i worked for the obama administration, i hated the way we handled north korea and bush. it was always treating them like an equal. i thought we should ignore them. i at one point wanted to say, if you can't launch a rocket that can't reach the outer atmosphere, we're not going to talk about you. but president trump inherited

something a little different. he inherited north korea at a time when they have been harder to ignore. they have clearly made technological advances. and six months ago, i would have told you that if we weren't alive in a year, north korea would have something to do with it. >> a lot of people felt that way. and to be fair, and i just want to be honest, you're right. a lot of people at his own state department would have agreed with you after two drinks in private for sure. so maybe the lesson of all of this is you don't necessarily need to insult foreign leaders, even evil ones, but maybe think more broadly. what we've been doing isn't working and nobody in washington is willing to acknowledge that because they're implicated in past bad decisions.

>> to the extent that our -- and you spend a lot of time focusing on immigration and there have been times in the last month where you have not like what the president said on immigration, that the republican party has not like what they hear from him, including on tv. this is going to be pretty similar. not that it'll be on tv. let's all hope it will be. but there are a lot of stakeholders here. for america, we're all one at this point because if kim does something crazy, he's going to grow us up irrespective of what party we're part of. but you have the south koreans, you have the japanese and the chinese. this is a problem. if he goes in there and he says, i'm a great deal maker, you have to look at what deals he's made in his life.

he tends to overpay. if he overpays for this deal, someone's going to suffer. it'll probably be someone other than us. >> i agree, this is complex. what we know is that previous strategies failed, which is why we're here in the first place. i have an open mind. thank you. i appreciate it. newly released radio transmissions from the parkland shooting so more bungling by the people supposed to be aiding. will anybody be held accountable for that? that's next. ing us money back on our bill. well, that seems fair. we didn't use it. wish we got money back on gym memberships. get money back hilarious. with claim-free rewards. switching to allstate is worth it.

it can power your apps with public services without starting from scratch. it brings your business up to speed, doing more with systems you have in place. it can bring all your apps to life and run them within your data center. it is... the new ibm cloud private. the cloud that's designed for your data. ai ready.

secure to the core. the ibm cloud is the cloud for smarter business. copdso to breathe better,athe. i go with anoro. ♪go your own way copd tries to say, "go this way." i say, "i'll go my own way" with anoro. ♪go your own way once-daily anoro contains two medicines called bronchodilators, that work together to significantly improve

lung function all day and all night. anoro is not for asthma . it contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. the risk is unknown in copd. anoro won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition, high blood pressure, glaucoma, prostate, bladder, or urinary problems. these may worsen with anoro. call your doctor if you have worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain while taking anoro. ask your doctor about anoro. ♪go your own way get your first prescription free at anoro.com.

>> tucker: newly released radio reportings from the parkland >>newly released police radio recording from the parkland massacre appear to show more. hey, matt. >> tucker, we know about every officer that responded to the shootings with potentially risk their lives and there are many stories of heroism emerging from that day. but the commanding officer and some of the first responders focused on blocking traffic and setting up a perimeter instead of rushing in to kill the shooter, which is what they're trained to do. the responders that day should

have said, "you take the first floor, i'll take the second, you take the third, and we won't stop until we kill the shooter." in a portion of the adi audio ye about to here, it's the disgraced school resource officer. you're also going to hear the female voice of the female officer, her two audible commands about the perimeter, not killing the shooter. t it seems officers did not know where the shooter was for a long time after the officers prioritized the traffic with one officer saying there might be more bullets coming from a window. >> do not approach the 12 and 1300 buildings. stay at least 500 feet away at this point. >> i know there's a lot going

on. do we have the perimeter set up? i want to make sure the perimeter is set up and all the kids are getting out. we need to shut down around the schools. >> is he still shooting? >> 54. we're trying to locate. we don't know where he's at. >> we've got gunshot holes either coming into or out of the building on the west side third floor. >> one ranking law enforcement officer that just listened to the audio we did sent a response to fox news. "it was very difficult to listen to. we failed in many ways." the entire community of parkland parents are irate. >> lives are being lost while the deputies who were on site were more concerned about closing off roadways than going

into the building and stopping the shooter and saving lives. >> today rick scott >>the president of the broward county police association. thanks a lot for coming on. you heard matt finish read the email he received from an officer. you probably know the person saying he was heartbroken to hear that tape. what was your reaction to it? >> well, i listened to the tape and i'm in receipt of a chronology of events. >> how did this happen? i don't understand how people, authorities with firearms on the scene never entered the building

while people were being murdered. do you? >> no, i can't explain that. >> can you guess what might have happened? >> no. i don't understand why the one video has the school resource deputy at the building and then heading towards building 12 and taking up position outside of building 12. that's on the chronology of events and also on the video. >> it seems like at least some of these guys knew there was shooting inside the building. you don't want to impugn people's motives, but other than cowa cowardice, what would be the explanation for that? >> i don't know. the coral springs police department were getting the 911 calls. if you're in the city of park la land and you dial 911, it goes

to coral springs dispatch. so all the live intel was going to the coral springs police officers. and the chronology that i have shows that coral springs and broward sheriff's officers simultaneously entered the structure and started clearing. >> do you think it's a little weird that the sheriff of broward county, now that we know that his department failed, is telling me that i need to surrender my gun rights. that's the lesson? >> i'm sorry. say that again. i'm sorry. >> why isn't the sheriff of broward county being held accountable for this? >> i can't answer that. there -- >>we talked to cathy. now some have decided we need to abolish all sexist language and

make it a crime. she'll join us next with her view of that. stay tuned. ♪ no, please, please, oh! ♪ (shrieks in terror) (heavy breathing and snorting) no, no. the running of the bulldogs? surprising. what's not surprising? how much money aleia saved by switching to geico.

fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more.

your heart doesn't only belong ♪to you. bye grandpa. and if you have heart failure, entrusting your heart to entresto may help. entresto is a heart failure medicine that helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. in the largest heart failure study ever, entresto was proven superior at helping people stay alive and out of the hospital compared to a leading heart failure medicine. don't take entresto if pregnant. it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren. if you've had angioedema while taking an ace or arb medicine, don't take entresto. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto. and help make more tomorrows possible.

♪ >>well, a belgium man has been convicted of a dastardly crime and ordered to pay almost $4,000 dollars. what did he do? he said something sexist. and belgium has a law against that. now that law has been put to use for the first time. cathy is our sherpa into progressive america. she thinks this might not be a bad idea for our country. so you think that we could learn something from belgium that maybe we should criminalize sexist speech. would we also criminalize sexist thought? i'm just trying to get the parameters here. >> i would say it's hateful speech and thoughts and people with those hatefuling thoughts

go onto commit hateful crimes. so why don't we nip it in the bud? >> so we're going to create a new class of thought crime. you said guys. would it ever conceivably apply to women. i was watching the bachelor last night. would they be up for sexism charges in your world? >> absolutely not. you know that. women as a minority in this country. and it's hard to be a sexist and put the majority down when you're still considered the minority. so, no, women cannot be sexist. no, we are the victims of sexism. >> what if you were like anna wintour and you had a magazine wholly devoted to exploiting women's bodies and eating disorders. because you're a woman, you

can't be sexist? >> believe it or not, the highest paid women in the world are models, unfortunately the only way women can make money through men are through modeling and through these magazines. she actually did a favor to women by showing them in these magazines. >> interesting. so sexist speech and thought would be criminalized. what would the be punishment be? would these be misdemeanors or felonies? >> should we listen to people when they're saying hateful things. yeah, they get a felony. put them away, make them learn their lesson. when they come out, they'll be better people. teach them a lesson. >> maybe they would come out as sad and broken people. would that bother you? >> it would not upset me if they're sad, no.

they're sad but they're not aggressive and violent. >> so, so be it. >> since sexist thought would be illegal, how would we determine -- >>sexist language, not thought. >> can we define sexist? >> hurtful to women. >> but all women don't have the same standard of what's hurtful. >> i think if a woman is offended, then yeah, it might be the wrong thing to do. so sexism, it's hard to tell, but women who are aware of it, feel it, understand it, and yeah, sexism is alive and well. and those of us who realize it want an end to it. we want to be treated equally. we have to teach these people that that is wrong. and this person in belgium did call the police officer better suited for another job because

this was a woman. it was a police officer. and that was sexist. the things he said were awful and he should be put away. >> it sounds like he's being punished. if we're creating a whole class of crime, obviously we're getting rid of the first amendment. but we would also need to hire a whole new class of law enforcement obviously to enforce these laws. what would that be like? where would there be speech police in public places? could they come into your home? how would you do this? >> this country already has it. there are profanity laws. they're according to municipalities and states. you can't say bad words in public within an officer or children's earshot. we already have these laws in our country. move on from words that offend to actions and concepts that

offend and that are violent. >> what's going to happen to rap music? >> rap music? well, i think teenagers are going to continue to enjoy it and parents are going to continue to hate it and hopefully the rap stars will learn to rap about nicer things or not teach such hatred. >> they better or they'll be in prison. cathy, thank you very much. good to see you. well, we had big news last night. but fear not, the quiz returns after this. and it's good. ♪ burned me up and down, shno way to cool it. ♪ ♪ ♪ every time you kiss me it's like sunshine and whiskey ♪

applebee's handcrafted burgers. any burger just $7.99. now that's eatin good in the neighborhood. so we know how to cover almost we've anything.st everything even a "red-hot mascot." [mascot] hey-oooo! whoop, whoop! [crowd 1] hey, you're on fire! [mascot] you bet i am! [crowd 2] dude, you're on fire! [mascot] oh, yeah! [crowd 3] no, you're on fire! look behind you. [mascot] i'm cool. i'm cool. [burke] that's one way to fire up the crowd. but we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪

♪ >> tucker: final exam >>final examas was cancelled la night due to breaking news from

north korea. but we still held the competition. here's what happened. oh, you're out of time. it's time for final exam where two news professionals face one another in a battle of knowledge. you can play along at home as they do. joining us tonight, fox chief national correspondent ed henry. he won the battle of defending champions last week. he gets to return. as challenger this week, jillian turner. you both know the rules, for the sake of consistency, here they are. hands on buzzers. i ask the questions. first one to buzz in gets to answer. every correct answer is worth a point. if you get it wrong, we deduct a point from your total. best of five wins. >> it's international women's day. i just thought you might want to mention that.

>> absolutely. here's the first question. after winning the academy award for best actress on sunday night, frances mcdormand had something unusual happen to her oscar. what happened? >> some guy stole it. >> did some guy steal it? >> this morning, terry bryant isn't celebrating. instead, charged with grand theft larceny, after allegedly swiping the best actress oscar from frances mcdormand. >> what's the long-term plan when you steal an oscar? hope your friends don't notice you didn't win? >> i'm mad i didn't get that because i watched the oscars for the first time in years. >> the larceny didn't happen in

realtime. >> question two, one of the world's most popular sodas announced this week they'll soon be selling their first-ever alcoholic drink. what company is it? a soda maker selling booze? care to guess? >> can you give us a hint? >> it is -- that's -- that's -- the judges have a hint but i think it's too. based in atlanta. >> coca-cola. >> is it coca-cola or could it be 7-up? >> something's brewing. coca-cola launches an alcoholic drink in japan. >> and of course it was in japan. >> right, but i didn't say that. >> no, you didn't. but you got coca-cola. >> yeah, because i asked for a hint. [laughter] >>you both got the hint, to be fair. by the way, i am rooting for

you. question three, at saturday's gridiron dinner, the president roasted washington elite. he zeroed in on one congresswoman. what member of congress did he target? >> nancy pelosi. >> you're saying she claimed that we can tighten our borders by mowing the grass? >> we all have a responsibility to protect our borders. should there be fencing? should there be technology? should they mow the grass so that people can't hide in it? >> wow, she really said that and we have the tape. okay. you can still turn it around, jillian. >> i just can't answer any more because i'll lose points. >> question four, a zoo in

indonesia is being criticized by animal rights activists. a video showed an orangutan at the zoo showed doing something typically only humans do. what was it? hint, the surgeon general disapproves. >> smoking? >> he was smoking. >> you knew that. >> an orangutan is called smoking a cigarette at a zoo, puffing away like a serious smoker. he knows what to do. it's crazy. officials say he likely learned how to smoke from watching humans. >> but who gave him the cigarette? >> i don't know, but they're hassling him. >> if you drive by mcdonald's today, you might see the golden

arches turned upside down to form a w. who is the fast food chain honoring? >> women. >> you don't think it's george w. bush? >> it might be. but i'm going with women. >> today is international women's day. there it is on your screen. mcdonald's has flipped the arches. they've turned the m upside down. it's a w for women. >> as a woman, did you eat a big mac today. >> i did not. but i was touched. >> wow. this is one of those games that had it gone on one more round, it might have been a little different. >> you mean it wasn't rigged? >> you were great. >> i studied. >> all the answers were in there. you're the only person with that book. >> they're an insubscription. "to ed, 9-11, 2003. to a reporter i do not want on

my tail." >>15 years ago. by the way, speaking of journalism, we're going to give you the coveted eric wemple mug. >> thank you. >> yeah. please come back, jillian. ed, we'll see you next week. ed's on fox and friends on the weekend. see if you can beat the pros. we'll be right back.

whatever you're doing to stay healthy... there's something you may be missing. a key part of your wellness that you may be... overlooking. it's your eyes. that's why there's ocuvite, from bausch + lomb. as you age your eyes can lose vital nutrients. ocuvite helps replenish those nutrients. ocuvite has lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega-3. nourish your eyes to help them be their healthy best. ocuvite eye vitamins. be good to your eyes.

theseare heading back home.y oil thanks to dawn, rescue workers only trust dawn, because it's tough on grease yet gentle. i am home, i am home, i am home

mikboth served in the navy.s, i do outrank my husband, not just being in the military, but at home. she thinks she's the boss. she only had me by one grade. we bought our first home together in 2010. his family had used another insurance product but i was like well i've had usaa for a while, why don't we call and check the rates? it was an instant savings and i should've changed a long time ago. there's no point in looking elsewhere really. we're the tenneys and we're usaa members for life. usaa. get your insurance quote today. >> tucker: it's been about 14 months sin >>it's been about 14 months since obama left the white house. do you miss him? do you miss him explaining how it was impossible for russia to rig an election. netflix is willing to gamble you

do. apparently the company is negotiating a deal to pay him and his wife for a show so they never have to stop lecturing you. have a great weekend. hannity is next. >>and welcome to the special breaking news edition of hannity. we have a ton of brand-new information tonight. and for the hour we'll be focusing on stories that media always ignores. does that mean finally this corrupt crooked witch hunt could be coming to an end? i have my beliefs and i'll tell you in a second. also,