pennsylvania. live coverage here tonight on fox news as the results come in. we'll be watching rick saccone's headquarters and connor lamb's headquarters. tuck is up next. have a good night. >> this is a fox news alert. the polls just closed. we're awaiting results in pennsylvania's 18th district special election. it's between connor lamb and rick saccone. ed henry has more. >> the district went to president trump by 20 points. should be easy picking for his party. his tariffs on aluminum and steel are very popular. means jobs. but the democrat have this candidate cut from central casting. connor lamb is all but running from national democratic leaders. he has made a direct appeal to

the union workers that snubbed hillary clinton last time around. the president labelled the democrat lamb the sham at a raucous rally saturday night slamming lamb. but republicans are nervous about rick saccone. he brought in donald trump jr., vowing the drain the swamp. if lamb takes this gop district, the media will have their narrative that the gop is easy pickings in the november mid-terms. if saccone wins it, it suggests the president's coat tails stronger than democrats thing. we'll have more at 11:00. stay glued to fox because tucker is awesome. >> tucker: you're a great reporter, ed. good to see you. president trump traveled to the state of california today to review eight separate prototypes for his proposed wall along the

u.s. mexico border. while there, he said this. >> the round piece that you see up here or you see more clearly back there, the larger it is, the better it is. it's very hard to get over the top. it's a deterrent from getting over the top. who would think? who would think? getting over the top is easy. these are like professional mountain climbers. they're incredible climbers. they can't climb some of these walls. some of them they can. those are the walls we're not using. >> democrats in congress oppose providing funding for the wall but some go further than that. recently some on the left have called for ending all federal border enforcement period. senator camel harris of california says that ice should be abolished entirely. "the washington post" editorial agrees. how is that distinct from having open borders? it's not clear. henry fernandez joins us tonight. thanks for coming on, henry. >> good to be here, tucker.

>> tucker: so there's obviously a lot of concern about illegal immigration, whatever you think the best solution is. what do you think the down side for american citizens is of illegal immigration? >> well, let's start with this wall that trump wants to build and let's remember that he first told us that it was going to be built and paid for by the mexicans. they said they won't do that. >> tucker: i'm sorry. i don't want to cut you off. i'm happy to talk about the wall. first, the predicate for the concern, which is the concern about illegal immigration. why should we be concerned about it? what are the down sides of illegal immigration for american citizens? >> you're the one that has the big concern. undocumented immigration, people coming into the u.s. without documents or overstaying visas, they're all way down. they've been down every year for some sometime now. so it's actually not a very significant problem. instead, this is something that trump is drumming up in order to

scare people. it doesn't have much basis -- >> tucker: so you don't think that when people come over because people do come over. there's a lot of people apprehended at the border and more than 10 million illegals in this country. you don't think that american citizens are hurt by that or have any legitimate reason to be concerned by it? >> again, i'm trying to understand what the big concern is here. what we're talking about is a border wall that would cost somewhere between 60 and $120 billion, money that would just be taxpayer dollars wasted for something that won't work. the solution -- >> tucker: hold on. >> how do you overcome a 30 foot wall with a 32 foot ladder -- >> tucker: i wonder if you're concerned at all about the effects on employment? so just to give you one among many examples. there's seven million american

primates, working men, that dropped out of the labor force. they tell -- there's a report by the fed on this. they tell researchers that the wages that they're competing for are too low and one of the reasons is because of competition from immigrants. you don't think that's a concern at all? that doesn't bother you. should people be worried about it? >> i think if we look at economic analysis, no. that should not be a significant concern for people. immigrants help build the economy which raises wages. what we've seen is wages are now, as unemployment has come down close to 4%, wages are starting to raise. that's what we would expect. this economy or any economy -- >> tucker: then why -- >> immigrants are essential to growing the economy. >> tucker: let me ask you, why, if we have approximately 11 million people here illegally and we have just to name one of them seven million american citizen men of working age not working, why wouldn't we prefer the citizens to be working

instead of the people here illegally? should we give priority to our citizens? do you think we should? >> i really feel like the premise of the question is missing just basic economics. if we want to create jobs, we need robust -- robust entry of immigrants into this country. that's what allows us to grow jobs in this country. >> tucker: but we have 11 million at least, the number may be higher. the baseline is 11 million illegal alien workers in this country. we still have one of the highest work force nonparticipation rates in history. so how many illegals will we need to help american citizens? what do you think the perfect number would be there? >> again, this is -- i just reject the entire premise of the question. you can keep asking it. >> tucker: no, i'm trying to get to what you're saying. we have 11 millions.

how many more -- >> tucker, i'm trying to answer the question the only way i can based on facts. the fact is that immigrants help grow the economy. that's what brings people in to the work force. that's what creates jobs. >> tucker: i'm just -- >> if you -- >> tucker: i'm responding by actual facts by telling you that doesn't work. so if you say we face no threat at all from illegal immigrants and our fears are rooted in bigotry, they're rationale -- >> your word. >> tucker: that's the supposition. why wouldn't we follow the lead of a lot of your fellow democrats and abolish ice? are you for that? >> certainly if we look at the fact that we haven't had ice -- why didn't have ice prior to 9/11. >> tucker: we had ins. same thing. >> it wasn't part of this super

agency at dhs, which creates real -- what we've seen in the transition to ice is a real cowboy behavior. this sense of people acting on their own outside of constitutional requirements. i can see absolutely why senator harris would raise such a concern. >> tucker: so you think it's a legitimate thing to say let's a polish ice? yes or no. you think it is. >> i think i answered it. i think serious issues were raised and it should seriously be considered. >> tucker: good. look, i don't want to misquote you. our viewers and the country should know what the progressive left is on ice. you explained that. thank you, henry. >> okay. thank you, tucker. >> tucker: a video going viral on the left shows a mother being arrested by ice. the cowboys you just heard of.

a pretty upsetting video. for that reason, it's getting wide play on the left. the key detail is being left out. the woman in the video is not some random illegal alien pulled off the street by the cowboys. she's suspected by the feds of organizing a human trafficking operation. mark kekorian is here. this is the definition of propaganda. if you show that video and take out the context, it's like showing man standing in tiananmen square. >> this is -- this happened near the border about ten miles north of the border. illegal immigrants all over national city, california where this happened. the border patrol, if they wanted to randomly arrest illegals, which they don't waste their time, they wouldn't have

done this. they knew this woman was involved in a smuggling ring, and they saw her out, they tried to get in touch with her before. she didn't rerespond. apparently when they confronted her on the street, she tried to flee. she tried to get in a car and drive away. so, you know, she's resisting arrest as you can see here. the border patrol did its job here. yes, it's an unsetting video because everybody is yelling and screaming. but this woman put herself in this situation by working with these criminal smuggling rings. >> tucker: apparently -- i don't think is -- the case has reached its conclusion. the point would be there was a reason for this. >> right, right. >> tucker: she wasn't just a hapless victim of the street. you just heard the head of the immigration studies say we ought to get rid of ice. what would happen if we did that? >> what would happen -- who

would be enforcing the immigration laws? that's the real question here. the border patrol does its job well. they'll probably call for getting rid of the border patrol next. the border patrol does a good job at and near the border. but most immigration enforcement happens in the country. who does that? ice does that. so what they're saying, once you get passed the border patrol, you should be home free. this isn't some new things. this is essentially what hillary clinton and bernie sanders said during the campaign. that any illegal immigrant that gets into the united states who doesn't actually kill somebody, isn't convicted of a violent felony, the way she put it, should be allowed to stay. this is not some off beat outlier opinion. this has become the position of the standard of the left and it shows how radicalized the

democratic party has become. >> tucker: is that their reason for eliminating all border security? >> of course not. >> tucker: and democrats won't run on this, will they? >> some of them might. generally no. that's the reason why the republicans are the stupid party and the democrats are the dumb party. it's not like they would exaggerate or use hyperbole. they just need to let the progressives say what they actually think. >> tucker: i agree. i'm talking an affirmative position in favor of our enemies. how is this different? i don't think it is. >> they don't believe in borders or immigration reform. >> tucker: i'm glad they're saying it. it's worth it to be honest. >> me too. >> tucker: secretary of state rex tillerson has become the latest departure from the trump administration. what does it mean going forward? does it have mean something brit hume is next.

what is the power of pacific? it's life insurance and retirement solutions to help you reach your goals. it's having the confidence to create the future that's most meaningful to you. it's protection for generations of families, and 150 years of strength and stability. and when you're able to harness all of that, that's the power of pacific. ask a financial advisor about pacific life. this one's below market price and has bluetooth. same here, but this one has leather seats! use the cars.com app to compare price, features and value. allergies with sinus you won't find relief here. go to the pharmacy counter for powerful claritin-d... while the leading allergy spray relieves six symptoms,

claritin-d relieves eight, including sinus congestion and pressure. claritin-d relieves more. we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield.

that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ you know what's not awesome? gig-speed internet. when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids,

and these guys, him, ah. oh hello. that lady, these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them. uh huh, sure. still yes! xfinity delivers gig speed to more homes than anyone. now you can get it, too. welcome to the party. >> tucker: i made a mistake in the last segment and i want to correct it. senator harris of california did not call for ending ice. she might have mounted a defense of ice as a former prosecutor. others on the left have called for it. we shouldn't have said that she has. polls have now closed in pennsylvania. we're watching for the results. we'll keep you apprises on fox. today secretary of state rex tillerson become the latest departure from the trump administration. president trump announced his firing via a morning tweet.

the president says he plans to nominate mike pompeo to be the new state department secretary and gina haspel will be nominated to run that agency. after ward, the president had this to say about rex tillerson. >> rex and i have talked about this awhile. we got along quite well but we disagreed on things. look at the iran deal. i think it's terrible. he thought it was okay. i want to break it or do something. he felt a little bit differently. so we were not really thinking the same. >> tucker: secretary tillerson himself said this. >> my commission as secretary of state he terminate at midnight march 31. between now and then, i'll address a few administrative matters related to my departure and work towards a smooth and orderly transition for secretary

of state designate mike pompeo. >> tucker: brit hume joins us tonight. an awful going on. i want to go in order. first tillerson, what do you make of this? >> well, it does show you cannot disagree with the president on major foreign policies and list forever. and the state department can be a bulky place. this president is not the first president getting his arms and it and getting control of it. there's a good argument of whether tillerson did either over there. but there's always this question with secretaries of state, are they representing the state department to the white house or the white house to the state department. the feeling in this white house is that tillerson was a creature of the building, although he

wasn't thought to be all that popular. so his days were probably numbered. it's regrettable. it means we'll have a period of delay while mike pompeo gets installed. the same will be true for his deputy who is supposed to take over at cia. and that leaves a period in which the agencies are not functioning in the way their new leaders will want them to. it's regrettable at the early stages that they're still getting the right people in place. >> tucker: yeah, it is regrettable. what do you make of the report the republican -- majority report from the intel community yesterday that found no collusion between the trump campaign and putin? >> i think it's probably correct that committee did find no collusion. i would note, tucker, this is in the face of the criticism that the house intel committee and its majority have received that meanwhile over in the sainted

senate intelligence committee, richard burr of north carolina, republican, said to a television interview in the last day or so, that that investigation, which has been thought to be very much more sober and bipartisan and better had come so far and essentially the same conclusion. there's a good reason for that. in all likelihood, there was no collusion. there's been no evidence of it so far and i think that piece of their conclusion is probably correct and i notice that even adam schiff of california who has been a dogged dissenter and a very partisan one on the house committee, even he denouncing the conclusions, all he said is the investigation should continue. he didn't say he or the committee has evidence that would dispute or even refute the committee's conclusion on collusion. >> tucker: a good point. he called it a tragic milestone but didn't explain why. finally, the special election in pennsylvania. a district outside pittsburgh

the president won by 20 points. seems tight tonight. what does this mean? are we inflating it? >> it's an election that i would hesitate to draw major conclusions from. the sign could be the protest vote that will come out to vote for the democrat because mr. trump. there's not much question about that in addition, they have this young attractive candidate on the democratic side, somewhat dowdy character on the republican side. this is conducted in the shadow of the departure of the previous incumbent that left them in a sex scandal. that casts a shadow over the part nominee. so bear this in mind, this is an election to fill a seat between now and november in which there will be a new district because of redistricting and this district will go away. so legislatively, it's pretty insignificant but will be seen as a bellwether depending who wins, no doubt about it. >> it's interesting the democrat is running away from the gun

issue, which i think a lot of democrats think is a winner for them. but not this one apparently. >> yeah, he is. he's saying he won't back nancy pelosi for speaker. he's trying to convince the people in the district, that it's a majority democratic district, it's been hospitable for republicans for a long time and a safe red district. he doesn't run away from the party on everything. i gather he did not support the tax cut, which the benefits of which may be starting to be felt in that district. so we'll see what effect that has. a lot of cross currents here, tucker. it's an unusual race. >> tucker: brit hume, the voice of reason in a turbulent world. thanks. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: and hillary clinton touring india and revealing what she thinks about you. pretty astonishing next. -ahh. -the new guy. -whoa, he looks -- -he looks exactly like me. -no. -separated at birth much?

we should switch name tags, and no one would know who was who. jamie, you seriously think you look like him? uh, i'm pretty good with comparisons. like how progressive helps people save money by comparing rates, even if we're not the lowest. even if we're not the lowest. whoa! wow. i mean, the outfit helps, but pretty great. look at us. why people everywhere are upgrading their water filter to zerowater. start with water that has a lot of dissolved solids. pour it through brita's two-stage filter. dissolved solids remain? what if we filter it over and over? (sighing) oh dear. thank goodness zerowater's five-stage filter gets to all zeroes the first time. so, maybe it's time to upgrade. get more out of your water. get zerowater.

looking for a hotel that fits... get more owhoooo.our water. ...your budget? tripadvisor now searches over... ...200 sites to find you the... ...hotel you want at the lowest price. grazi, gino! find a price that fits. tripadvisor. we the people... are defined by the things we share. and the ones we love.

who never stop wondering what we'll do or where we'll go next. we the people who are better together than we are alone... are unstoppable. welcome to the entirely new expedition. >> tucker: the polls have closed in the special election in pennsylvania. we're waiting to see who won. the results are coming in now. hillary clinton thousands of miles away in india. she figures it's safe to say what she really thinks about you. watch. >> his whole campaign make america great again is looking backwards. you didn't like black people getting rights. you don't want women getting jobs. you don't want to see the indian american succeeding. whatever your problem is, i'm going to solve it. we don't do well with married

white women. and part of that is an identification with the republican party and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should. >> tucker: notice who hillary clinton did not blame for her loss. herself. or her ideas or anything she's ever said or done. but it is a mistake to make this about hillary clinton. she's a figure of the past. her ideas are very much a feature of the present. the clip you just heard precisely sums up the view of the left in america right now. a bigoted middle class is holding back progress. they belief that. so the democratic party, voters in the middle of the country don't have legitimate views or aspirations. they only have ugly gut reactions. they're racist and white people.

white women, hillary clinton says, can't think for themselves. they're attached to the stubborn little cells of independence called families. nothing stands in the way of power like families so they must be smashed. that's the message. hillary may be washed up but she understands what the goals are. and julie is here. thanks for coming on. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: i don't want to beat up on hillary. >> you don't? i thought that's why you brought me on. >> tucker: i'm sincere. she lost. i feel sorry for the loser. i think she's become less popular among democrats and humiliating herself. i don't want to pound on her. i do want to talk about the ideas. i'm struck. she's the perfect embodiment of an attitude that pervades the democratic party. we lost and it's your fault. you're bigots and you're standing in the way of progress. what do you think of that attitude? it's everywhere. >> i don't think it's a fair

attitude. one valid point that a lot of people make when talking about a lot of the statements that hillary clinton makes is she doesn't necessarily talk about the tactical errors that her team made as far as campaigning and appealing to the middle of the country. so while i certainly am personally against the administration that is currently in office and a lot of the things they stand for, i think that the democrats also need to account for the errors that they made in the 2016 election. >> tucker: i hear that a lot. a lot of top people in the hillary campaign are smarter than i am. they had a billion dollars. there wasn't a lot of tactical thinking that they were not aware of. they did the tactics right. >> i don't know that they did. i'm not to argue about the problems of the democratic party. >> tucker: could the problem have been that they didn't understand that the middle class of the country was dying in absolute terms and felt hated

and dismissed by them? that maybe was the problem. don't you think? >> when i talk about a tactical issue, not appealing to the middle part of the country, not delivering the economic messages that would resonate with those people, yeah, that was a tactical error. yeah. >> tucker: it's a deep error. what do you think of hillary's line -- again, i'm not beating up on her. but this gets to a core contradiction in modern feminism. white women that she said with disdain voted for trump because they were pressured by their husbands and sons. she thinks that women are so weak-minded that their bossed around by their sons in the voting booth? doesn't that tell you a lot? isn't that revealing? >> as much as i hate that sound bite, it makes it sound as though women are incapable of making their own decisions when it comes to the voting booth. as much as i wish this weren't true, there's data to back that up. there's a study by oregon state

university that said women, white women, are unduly pressured by their partners when it comes to making political decisions and generally that women happen to -- basically when, when they're unmarried, they tend to vote with the good of their gender in mind. whereas once they're married, they are more likely to vote in their husband's best economic interests. this is largely because women hold less money and earn less money and hold less power in this country and there's evidence to back up the fact that women when married and specifically white women tend to vote with their husband's economic interests in mind and that is perceived to be for white women at least voting republican. >> tucker: so if you have a group of people, married white people and you spent like a huge amount of time attacking them on the basis of their race and their marital status as the

democratic party and -- >> they attack married people? >> >> tucker: yes. it's not their constituency. the policies are aimed at the unmarried people. >> think that's vastly untrue. >> tucker: last week chuck schumer sad he wasn't going to support a federal judicial nominee because he was white. i wonder, is that -- what do you think the net effect of that is? is that good for the country, for politicians to say that kind of thing out loud? >> you're mischaracterizing the fact that democrats are not trying to appeal to married people. i think they're trying to appeal to an ideology adopted by married and unmarried people. >> tucker: i like married women. i think i have a higher opinion of women than you do and i'm not a feminist. i think they vote the way they want to vote. ones i know do. >> i think that that is by and large true. some of the things that she said oversimplified it in that

particular instance. there's some data to back up what you said there. >> you're a brave woman to say that on tv. >> thanks. >> tucker: a handful of powerful and omni present tech companies don't just dominate the marketplace, they control our lives and what we think and what we're capable of thinking. is it time to break them up? one writer that studied the issue says yes, it is. he jones us next. and the results are coming in. we'll update you on the special election after this. who's the new guy? they call him the whisperer. the whisperer? why do they call him the whisperer? he talks to planes. he talks to planes. watch this. hey watson, what's avionics telling you? maintenance records and performance data suggest replacing capacitor c4. not bad. what's with the coffee maker? sorry. we are not on speaking terms.

what's with the coffee maker? we rbut we are not victims.ack. we are survivors. we are survivors. we are survivors. and now we take brilinta. for people who've been hospitalized for a heart attack. we take brilinta with a baby aspirin. no more than one hundred milligrams... ...as it affects how well brilinta works. brilinta helps keep platelets from sticking together and forming a clot. in a clinical study brilinta worked better than plavix®. brilinta reduced the chance of another heart attack. or dying from one. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor,... ...since stopping it too soon increases your risk of clots in your stent,... ...heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily,... ...or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers,... ...a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. slow heart rhythm has been reported. tell your doctor about bleeding,... ...new or unexpected shortness of breath, any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. if you recently had a heart attack, ask your doctor about brilinta. my heart is worth brilinta.

if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca... ...may be able to help. was a success for choicehotels.com badda book. badda boom. this year, we're taking it up a notch. so in this commercial we see two travelers at a comfort inn with a glow around them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com". who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. nobody glows. he gets it. always the lowest price, guaranteed. book now at choicehotels.com [seen it. covered it. n. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ ♪ get outta my dreams ♪ get into my car ♪ get into my car ♪ ♪ get outta... applebee's to go. order online and get $10 off $30.

now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

and get $10 off $30. doespeninsula trail?he you won't find that on a map. i'll take you there. take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales. oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. (avo) get 0% apr financing on all-new 2018 subaru outback models. now through april 2nd. >> tucker: if you grew up in this country, you heard the stories of the old robber barons from the 19th century that crushed the aspirations of ordinary people. rockefeller, standard oil, carnegie. the companies were massive and powerful and at the time they seemed to bend the entire country to their will.

but that is over, or is it? today amazon, google and facebook and apple are not just richer and more powerful than the old monopolies that have existed throughout history, they have far more control over our daily lives. what should we do about it? scott galloway is here with us. he just wrote a great piece of esquire calling for the breakup of the tech titans biggest companies. thanks for coming out, scott. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: so you took a look at these companies and their effect on the american economy, american life and your conclusion was break them up? >> that's correct. i think we're at a part of the economic cycle, the economy needs to be oxygenated again. i don't think they have done anything wrong, if you will. i think the economy of innovation that we have become dependent upon has gotten to a point that small companies have difficulty getting out of the crib and big companies are being euthanized before they should because these companies choke

off capitol. so i think it's time. >> tucker: we have a lot of laws against that, federal laws. so google, for example, which has a choke hold on human information, everything you know is on google and they have an effective monopoly on search. that seems like too much power for any organization to have. they have to misuse it. why hasn't congress done anything to reduce that power and the threat to us? >> that's the correct question. google. 92% of the market that is bigger than the entire advertising market of any nation with the exception of the u.s. and probably blow by the ad market of the u.s. in two years. basically because current antitrust law is based on the premise that if it's good for the consumer, it's good for society. most people would have a

difficult time arguing that google isn't good for the consumer. the problem is we don't know what we don't know. we don't know what companies would have emerged if we don't have a duopoly. if you didn't work for one of the two, you joined magazine and newspapers and you're in a big that is in structural decline. >> tucker: so between facebook and google, all digital news is really controlled, the purse strings are controlled by two companies. that's not a threatening concentration of power? >> i believe it is a threatening concentration of power. if fox or news corps that were weaponized by the russian government, they would have been abandoned. in the case of facebook, you have two companies that control almost all traffic and e-commerce and your presence on the web. and advertisers have no choice.

so there's too much power in the hands of these companies. i don't think they're evil. i don't think they have done anything wrong. i think they do what companies are supposed to do they're growing earnings. but at some point referees need to step in, throw a yellow flag. they would be better for the economy if there were 11 or 12 companies instead of the four we're discussing today. >> tucker: i don't think there's a serious conversation about that on capitol hill about that. but i hope you spark one. thanks, scott. >> i appreciate that, tucker. >> tucker: thanks. the u.k. is welcoming home isis fighters literally people that fought for isis but the u.k. will not let conservatives visit the country. i'm not making that up. we'll be right back. [phone ringing]

need a change of scenery? the kayak price forecast tool tells you whether to wait or book your flight now. so you can be confident you're getting the best price. giddyup! kayak. search one and done.

you totanobody's hurt, new car. but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance.

>> tucker: after 14 months, republican members of the house intelligence committee said there was no collusion between donald trump and vladimir putin during the 2016 campaign. phillip mudd spends a lot of time passing judgment on the report or in general. it was not the first time. watch this. >> if this report were written on toilet paper, i wouldn't stoop to wipe my [bleep] with it. congress will have to transition to how do we understand what the president of the united states says to understanding that these are circus clown remarks. >> i'm a proud [bleep]. my family was called [bleep], [bleep] and i'm proud of that. we came when people from ireland and italy were seen as dirty people. dirty catholics that didn't belong in a protestant country.

>> tucker: whoa! next time you hear some idiot reporter lavishing praise on the so-called intelligence community and reminding you what is unpatriotic to question their conclusions, phillip mudd is the one they're talking about. he's the one that we're trusting with our most sensitive secrets. there's four former cia officers running as democrats. liberals couldn't be more thrilled. suddenly they love the cia. they love large secretive agencies that undermine democracy. and the u.k. says conservatives could be hazardous to the nation's diversity. this past weekend brittany pettybone and her boyfriend were barred from entering the u.k. because they planned to interview tommy robinson.

monday, british police halted her on the grounds that she was a radical christian and possibly a terrorist. meanwhile, radical muslims, more than 400 former isis fighters were welcomed. katie wrote the book "rude" and joins us now. katy, great to see you. only a country that hits itself, its heritage, honey people that would act like this. >> it's madness, tucker. i cannot tell you. for the regular british man or woman in the street, they're shaking their heads and say what has this country come to? we're welcoming back the jihadists and they have done their work in syria. they're not that good at jihads. you're supposed to blow yourself if you come back, you probably

weren't that good in the first place. we're turning away conservatives that want to stand up for being christian conservatives. and our government has sided with the islamists loosers. we have laws here in the u.k. that we didn't know about that are being enforced. >> blasphemy laws that are being applied to christians but muslims. christianity was spread and now they won't let the same people in their own country. what animates this? why the change? why do they feel this way? >> there's this thought that spread amongst liberals, among the labor party, the democrats and the conservatives. we have a conservative government in power. you wouldn't believe it. it seems to be that being white is considered wrong. being christian is considered

wrong. trump is wrong. there's a lot of right answer. islamic is right. jihadists is right. we shouldn't pros cute them, we should embrace them. we're up there on the endangered species, to be a white christian conservative woman. i'm right up there on the endangered animal list with the black rhino and the black rhino has an advantage because he's black. >> and the u.k. is a democracy purportedly. you voted for brexit. you still get to vote for the time being. the majority of your population i bet you my card does not agree with the policies i just described. why are they putting up with them? >> there's this sense right now, this place, this country, has never been this tense. it feels like a pressure cooker. someone is screwing down the lid. there's going to be a tipping point. that feeling of people rising up

to say no more of this. we will not be silenced anymore. and the thing is people hold on to certain voices. there's a lot of support for these youtubers that you spoke of that were banned. when you start silencing the people that are finally speaking out, people like myself in fact, i'm surprised i'm still here. i'm surprised i haven't been deported. you know, then people -- there will come a point when enough is enough and there will be some kind of uprising. watching conservatives being detained for two days, being charged or detained on terror when they're just young conservatives with a passion for their culture and a passion for their country, it is such a disappointing time for the u.k. i do think there needs to be much more of an attitude where we stop tip toeing around the cultures that choose to join us and start defending the culture they have chosen to join. >> tucker: used to be a free

country. that's authoritarian what you're describing. thanks for telling us about that. sounded familiar. votes are coming in tonight from the special election in pennsylvania. polls closed 51 minutes ago. we'll discuss the results and implications with bret baier that joins us next.

the more you know the the commute is worth it.me, for all the work you pour into this place, you sure get a lot more out of it. you and that john deere tractor...

so versatile, you can keep dreaming up projects all the way home. it's a longer drive. but just like a john deere, it's worth it. nothing runs like a deere. now you can own a 1e sub-compact tractor for just $99 a month. learn more at your john deere dealer. whoamike and jen doyle?than i thought. yeah. time for medicare, huh. i have no idea how we're going to get through this. follow me. choosing a plan can be super-complicated.

but it doesn't have to be. unitedhealthcare can guide you through the confusion, with helpful people, tools and plans. including the only plans with the aarp name. well that wasn't so bad at all. that's how we like it. aarp medicare plans, from unitedhealthcare. yes or no? do you want the same tools and seamless experience across web and tablet? do you want $4.95 commissions for stocks, $0.50 options contracts? $1.50 futures contracts? what about a dedicated service team of trading specialists? did you say yes? good, then it's time for power e*trade. the platform, price and service that gives you the edge you need. looks like we have a couple seconds left. let's do some card twirling twirling cards e*trade. the original place to invest online.

we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ >> tucker: this is a fox news alert. results are coming in from the

special election in the 18th district outside pennsylvania. bret baier has been following this from the beginning. he's the anchor of "special report" and our chief political anchor. what does this mean? >> only 12% in now. a lot of votes coming from allegheny county, which in this particular district, pennsylvania 18, is the bleed-over from the pittsburgh suburbs. right now the democrat, connor lamb, is doing well there. he's outperforming where many people thought he would be. the real question is, how will he do in the more red districts. this district is more red. president trump won it by almost 20 points back in the 2016 election. >> tucker: so what are the issues that divide these candidates? the president has been front and center and taken a referendum on him. maybe it is. are there other issues at play? >> there are in just how they're pitching themselves.

but connor lamb, the democrat against rick saccone, connor lamb is running away from nancy pelosi saying he's a gun rights supporter and pro tariffs like president trump is putting forward and has the support of unions. rick saccone saying connor lamb is essentially a wolf in sheep's clothing and he would vote with the democrats. that's the separation. this is not a race that has been like the georgia race where democrats bombarded hollywood-types and came in there with big names. this has been connor lamb running his own race. different than the national democratic party has. >> tucker: yeah. smart. that's probably wise of him. republicans have put an enormous amount, washington republicans, into this race. how much? >> well, if you add it all up, it's upwards of $15 million. in one house race. the interesting thing about this is that if the districts hold as they were redrawn in

pennsylvania, if that's not overthrown by the courts, you're talking about a district where they're going to spend millions and millions on both sides that will eventually disappear and will no longer be a congressional district. so i think that this is just a narrative setting. if democrats do win tonight, they're going to say this is the wave that they were looking for. >> tucker: huh. what is turnout like? do we have any indications what the result would be other than the polls? >> it's early. allegheny reports that the numbers were up, the lines were long. if they were in line by 8:00, they were able to vote. in allegheny county, that's significant. we'll see what the turnout is in the redder parts of the district. probably in the next hour or so. >> tucker: you'll be up late. thanks, bret. stay with fox for election coverage throughout the night. that's about it for us tonight. tune in every evening, 8:00 p.m. to the show that is a sworn

enemy of smugness and group thinking. which is everywhere right now. good night from washington. sean hannity is next. hi, sean. >> sean: hi, tucker. great show as always. the polls are closed in the pennsylvania's 18th district special election. we'll have updates throughout the hour and what it means. we also have major developments breaking news. president trump scoring another big win after visiting california and viewing border wall prototypes. that means he's one step closer to fulfilling his campaign promise and yeah, building the wall. also tonight president trump blasting the governor of california and the liberal mayor of oakland for protecting criminal illegal immigrants that are posing a serious threat to you, the american people. we have all of that and plus self stunning new revelations about the clinton dossier tonight. according to a new book out today, barack obama's 2012 campaign, they hired fusion gps, the form