tv Hannity FOX News March 27, 2018 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT
10:00 pm
we are doing our best to resist. jennifer palmieri from the clinton campaign has a new book out. she is going to join us tomorrow night. that will be fun. good night from washington. sean hannity is next. >> sean: hey, tucker. great show as always. welcome to "hannity." multiple breaking news stories to bring you tonight. showdown brewing at this hour in the sanctuary state of california some now revolting against thatat state's insane policies that literally shield criminal illegal immigrants. one california county has a new plan to buck the golden state policies and actually help i.c.e. enforce america's immigration laws. the under sheriff from orange county who is fighting back will join us exclusively tonight. plus, we'll show you all out hysteriacoming from the left after the commerce department announced that the 2020 census will actually asky respondents if they are d citizens. citizens questioned on the
10:01 pm
census. the horror. the american left is in a complete meltdownn after all but guaranteeing a wall on the southern border, the president is now closer tonight than you think to fulfilling that important campaign promise. we have those details andfugn also trump is getting tough on russia. the mainstream media is spinning ina. circles. didn't they claim he wouldra never get tough on russia? we have brand new discoveries tonight to bring that you could reveal even more bias and corruption, believe it or not, at the highest levels of the fbi.or sit tight. we have a lot of information that we're going to get in tonight. jeff zucker, i hope you are watching tonight's breaking news opening monologue. ♪ radical left wing california governor jerry moon beam brown signed a law making california a sanctuary state. california's lawless lawmakers are now literally barring police fromm determining the citizenship status of anyone charged with a crime thereby preventing the federal government from effectively deporting criminal illegal immigrants and enforcing federal law. but now some localities are
10:02 pm
starting to fight back. now the city los alamitos, that is in orange county california, they voted earlier this month to actively defy the states sanctuary status. earlier today, origin counties supervisors followed suit and have voted to join president trump's lawsuit against california. in the meantime, the county sheriff's office have wanted a new plan to skirt california's insane sanctuary laws. they're actually going to assist the federal government in deporting illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes and, of course, those standing in the way of the rule of law. now, the plan is reallyf simple. the orange county sheriff's office will now make the names and release dates for every prisoner publicly available in an online database called whose in jail? this will allow i.c.e. to cross-reference identities and deport those illegal immigrants that are convicted of crimes and, ofre course, a threat to society. and in response, the attorney general of california, well, he is now
10:03 pm
issuing a veiled threat toto those that challenge california's sanctuary status which, of course, defies federal law. watch this. >> i have to take a closer look at what orange county is saying and possibly doing.g. state law is state law. and it's my job to enforce state law. i will do so. and we want to make sure that every jurisdiction, including orange county, understand what state lawin requires of the people and the subdivisions of the state of california. >> sean: i actually dare the state attorney general of california to do this. if he does, that means the oakland mayor can be arrested by the federale government for aiding and abetting federal criminal aliens by tipping them off that they're going to enforce the law. now, we'll have a lot more on this later in the show when the orange county under sheriff will join us. s also tonight, the california lunancy continues. that state is now set to sue the
10:04 pm
trump administration again, this time over a question on the upcoming 2020 u.s. census. the census will ask non respondents or those that want to respond are you a u.s. citizen? that's it careful attorney general said the question is not just a bad idea also illegal. mr. attorney general, i beg to differ. there was even more hysteria of course in the left wing, abusively biased so-called mainstream media. watch this. >> what do we want from the census? we want an accurate count. let's defer to the experts.he will this help with accuracy? w it will not. people will not answer the question. >> let's be realistic about do we think this is about getting an accurate view of the census and protecting voting rights or is it to and in fact suppress minority voting? >> the justice department's motivation here seems to betm quite so a ruse for adding a question that could veryin seriously depress participation and result in
10:05 pm
a failed census all together. >> what do you say to critics who argue that this will ultimately target immigrants. fewer resources for immigrant communities? >> sean: the main goal ofse the census has been to determine demographico information about the population that lives inside the united states. but, the left, members of the biased press, they want you to believe that we aren't allowed to determine how many citizens versus noncitizens are actually living here. that makes no sense m considering congressional districts are literally made up of what the populationgr is. nothing says that responsible immigration policy, you know, like well who is living in your w country, really hard question. we'll have more on that in a second. when it does come to the wall on the southern border, there is big news out of washington. according to reports, the president will use military and national defense funding to cover initial construction cost of the wall, citing
10:06 pm
what is a clear national security risk presented by unprotected borders. this is a huge step forward for the administration and it would be a political victory and serious progress reports to battle and secure our borders. now, here's what the deputy white house press secretary hogan gidley had to say about this on "fox & friends" earlier today.. >> the president is now saying, or kind of hinted around at least on twitter over the weekend, that he could use all of that military funding, there was a lot of military funding going into the pocketbooks of those men and women fighting for our country, but there is a loft extra money to be used, more than what they asked for. more than what the white house asked for, so there is talk that he might use that extra money to build the wall since he didn't get the funding, he only got 1.6. >> that was his twitter. >> his twitter was saying might use this funding to build the wall. >> i don't want to get ahead of his announcement. d i can't say, this is one reason -- >> what announcement? >> if he makes an announcement, how he will spend the money to
10:07 pm
build the wall. i will say it's one of the major victories for the american people in this legislation, which was actually building a wall. >> sean: when the funding becomes reality, president trump will be fulfulling a major campaign promise. the president has already started to look for prototypes for this wall. all right, another top story tonight, the destory trump press spent a year saying russia, russia, russia collusion.ld the narrative is crumbling right before their eyes. the left saidd president trump would never, ever be tough on russia. you might remember the daily hysteria, take a look. >> i think he is afraid of the president of russia. >> why? >> i think one can speculate as to why, that the russians may have something on him personally.he that they could always roll out and make his life more difficult. >> it's so clear at this point that vladimir putin and his associates, somebody has something on donald trump. >> that may be something d that turns the key in the russia probe is figuring outth why this president is so deferential to putin and to
10:08 pm
russia and if there is some sort of kompromat that they have on him. >> donald trump is afraid, a political hurricane is out there at sea for him. we will call it hurricane vladimir. the whole russia thing. >> they make these decisions time and time again in a way that makes it appear that they are hostages. that he is vladimir putin'spp hostage. >> sean: that was just last week. "they have something on trump. he can't act against putin." yesterday, the trump administration, they announced tough new actions against vladimir putin and his regime in response to the poisoning of a former spy and his daughter in great britain. oh, the trump policy includes the expulsion of 60 russian diplomats, the closure of russia's consulate in seattle. pretty tough. make no mistake. this is a very aggressive move against putin's regime. it sends a powerful message that the united states and our allies are not going to bow down to moscow. i guess they don't have anything on trump.
10:09 pm
even former cia director turned cnn shill michael hayden, he's praising president trump. wow, hell has frozen over. let's look. >> felt familiar. felt a bit like old times. look at what just happened. we are tough on russia. we acted in concert with allies globally. the united states took a leadership role. very untrumpian. i'm very happy to see it. >> sean: glad we can make you happy. general hayden is right. some in the media are still doing whatever they can to discredit president trump's latest move. by the way, obama never did anything this tough. he was telling dmitry medvedev, "tell vladimir i will have more flexibilityty after the election." watch this.ll >> it was almost like the old days where the united states and allies something of a position. not so good part of this, joe, foreign policy on autot pilot. we still could have done a lot more. if we really want to hurt
10:10 pm
the russians and putin specifically, you go after the banks here, where there is still a lot of russian money being housed. >> i think what's happened is the allies have kind of shamed the president into this action today. we would be standing alone very obviously if we didn't do something. it allows the president cover. he can say, look, i'm tough on russia. putin is laughing at trump tonight because he knows he has license to do whatever he wants. >> did the administration send a strong enough signal? >> not yet. if you want to send a strong signal, i think at some point, you've got to look at some money sanctions.an you have got to get at putin and the individuals around him. >> sean: you mean like president trump pursuing l energy independence? that is the heart of the russian economy? and guess what? that will hurt vladimir putin and any economicat chances or growth that he has. i told you journalism is dead and buried in this country.
10:11 pm
so it's not surprising to hear the media bending over backwards to bash president trump even when he does something tough and strong and good. you will not hear this from the so-called journalists over at these other networks. but it is important to remember this is the latest tough action from the trump administration because they won't tell you, but earlier in march, the president announced critical newew economic sanctions against russia in response to election meddling in february. around 300 kremlinin linked russian mercenaries were killed or wounded by the u.s. military. that following russia's aggressive actions near a base in syria where americans were stationed. i and, of course, this all comes after president obama essentially did nothing but appease and ignore and suck up to vladimir putin year after year. now, tonight russia is vowing to retaliate against the trump administration's tough actions, oh, maybe they will release the information they have on trump but unlike the obama administration, president trump, well, he is not going to take hostile actions byby russia very lightly. and meanwhile, now that the media is russia, russia, russia narrative has fallen
10:12 pm
apart, it's stormy, stormy, stormy, and more stormy taking center stage. desperate to find some kind of division between president trump and his supporters. cnn actually amazingly held a focus group, they did it withd christian female trump supporters. they wanted to get theiro reaction to anderson cooper's really, really bizarre and creepy interview with stormy daniels and, of course, karen mcdougal. unfortunately for fake news cnn, the group session didn't exactly go as they hoped it would and you can actually see the reaction in their so-called journalists. take a look. >> what was your first impression of stormy daniels? >> i feel sorry for her. >> my heart hurts for her. >> this is a porn star. why are we giving it any credibility? >> exactly. >> why would she come out and give this interview if she wasn't telling the truth?h? >> money and more money. >> do any -- based on thisas interview, do any of you believe that stormy daniels did have sex with donald trump?
10:13 pm
>> i don't believe it because i haven't seen any hard proof.en >> i know that when i voted for him, i wasn't voting for a choir boy. >> he hasn't changed as a person in order to become a president. stormy daniels, if you -- the lifestyle she is leading now, i wish she would turn her life over the way trump has. >> sean: yikes. that didn't work out the way they had planned. over at cnn, the king of porn soon to be really scandal plagued jeff zucker, just saying by the way, we know, best friend of matt lauero it's an open secret and the chief of fake news, and his number one news anchor anderson cooper, they are now desperately trying toin rehabilitate their reputation tonight after jerry springer jr., anderson creepy cooper, had his interviews with karen mcdougal and stormy daniels.
10:14 pm
>> would he call you? >> i would call him, he would call me. >> were you attracted to him? so the sex was consensual? did he actually try to hand you money? did he bring up his wife? would he talk about his child? his son? were you in love with him? >> i was, yeah. um-huh. h >> and do you think he was in love with you? did donald trump ever say to you that he loved you?ou did he have any nicknames for you? what did you think of the apartment? and he showed you around the apartment? how did you feel being in his apartment? did he ever compare to you any of his kids? did he ever use protection? >> told donald trump turn around and take off his pants. >> yes. >> did he? >> yes. he pulled down his underwear. he had his underwear on and i gave him a couple swats. >> this was done in a joking manner. >> yes. >> did you have dinner in the room? >> yes. >> what happened next? and had you sex with him? >> yes. >> you were 27. he was 60. were you physically
10:15 pm
attracted to him? >> no. >> not at all? >> no. >> did you want to have sex with him? >> no. but i didn't say no. i'm not a victim. i'm not. >> it was entirely consensual. >> oh, yes. >> in an industry where condom use is an issue, did he use aa condom? >> no. >> did you ask him to? i >> no. a >> after had you sex, what happened? he definitely wanted to continue to see you. >> oh, for sure. >> it wasn't at that point a business meeting, it was watching "shark week."ew >> sean: jerry springer has a lot of new competition. the reviews by the way have not been pretty for the fake news network. unfortunately, we hear there is a lot more bad newsws coming.rs just a few minutes, the great one mark levin is going to weigh in on all things fakee news cnn and of course their new low. of course also tonight congressman mark meadows and the congressional investigators, they are making very important discoveries on a real news story with damning, potential implications for james comey and bias at some of the highest levels at the fbi. over the weekend,
10:16 pm
congressman meadows tweeted out a shocking text between the disgraced anti-trump fbi love birds lisa page, peter in the exchange page sends a link to an article writes "ha, first line made me smile." first line of that article frome july 28, 2016, "potentially unpleasant news for jim comey. we need to you intervene in the 2016 election again." as meadows points out, it's pretty important to note this text came just days after the fbi began their russia investigation and right after they exonerated hillary clinton. this an eerie and potentially damning new discovery. by the way, just the lateston reason why a second special counsel needs to be appointed to investigate the investigators. they cannot investigate themselves. now, remember, this is what attorney general jeff ito sessions said during his interview with our own shannon bream earlier this month.
10:17 pm
this is important. pay close attention. >> i have appointed a person outside of washington many years in the department of justice, to look at all the allegations that the house judiciary committee members sent to us. we are conducting that investigation. >> sean: every day we have more and more information coming out about the deep state forces that are working against president trump. of course, with their friends, the compliant news media. also tonight, the house judiciary committee chairman bob goodlatte, he is demanding answers, rightly so. late last week he issued aly subpoena to the doj, citing the slow pace of cooperation from the fbi,f information related to the bureau's clinton investigation and documents explaining why andrew mccabe was fired.e earlier tonight, the fbir director wray has responded to this request, promising toto speed up the production ofro documents by doubling the amount of staff, working on the request, and he wrote, "up until today we have dedicated 27 fbi staff to review out records that are potentially responsive
10:18 pm
to chairman goodlatte's request. the actual number of documents responsive to this request is likely in the thousands. regardless, i agree that the current pace of production is too slow. accordingly, i am now doubling the number of assigned fbi staff for a total of 54 to cover two shifts per day, 8 to midnight, to expedite completion of this project. there are 1.2 million pages involved. in this program, we had promise you had to not stop our digging for truth and for answers. because you, the american people, deserve that. you deserve that and so much more.nd which brings us to our next story tonight that is now breaking from sara carter. according to her sources, the special counsel, robert mueller has finally literally complied with the judge's order to hand over all of the evidence in mueller's case that he has against general michael flynn to authorities and attorneys. this comes as some have now speculated that mueller intentionally withheld information that would be exculpatory to flynn in
10:19 pm
order to garner a plea deal. we reached out to the special counsel's office for comment on sara's reporting. of course they denied comment.in she joins us now. fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett and investigative reporter sara carter. this is huge. the judge we are talking about is the judge that was involved in the ted stephens case. he is the one that found that exculpatory evidence was withheld in that case. we know that both weissmann and robert mueller have in their history withholding exculpatory evidence. this judge sounded ticked off. he wants to make the decision, does that now mean general flynn might be withdrawing that plea and maybe even exonerated? >> that's what we don't know. what we do know and what's really fascinating, sean, is that the judge mandated this order after flynn pled guilty, which is highly unusual. he did it after the guilty plea.il
10:20 pm
that means that this order supersedes the plea agreement that flynn had with mueller. and what they asked for was all evidence, all information, even that which would be favorable to flynn. they also said and the judge stipulated this, that even if you believe the evidence that you have obtained has nothing to do with this case, you still have to turn it over to me. and then i will make the decision whether or not to turn that information overot to flynn's attorneys, robert kellner. the judge is taking this very seriously. they wants all of this -- they wanted him to turn over all of this information. he has complied, according to the sources i have spoken with and as you have said special counsel has not commented on this. neither has robert kellner, i don't know where is he going to go forward. we know in may they will go before the judge again and then they are going to arrange what we believe to be was a the sentencing hearing. but right now it looks like anything can happen and maybe flynn can even withdraw that plea. at least that's what i'm hearing from a lot of people with a lot of hope. >> sean: even strzok and
10:21 pm
comey didn't think flynn lied. so either this was -- >> correct. >> sean: we'll go after your soi or you agree to this or they just made it up. gregg? >> there was a lot of pressure. they put a lot of pressure on him and probably twisted his arm. i mean, this is what they do. >> sean: this is what they do. >> for the past few weeks with weissmann and mueller. right now, we know for a factwe that peter strzok, based on former fbi director james comey's testimony before the house intelligence committee -- >> sean: they believed him. >> they believed flynn. >> why would he plead guilty? >> the two agents who interviewed michael flynnci are percipient witnesses. w they are very important in any case against flynn. if they walked out of that interview as we now know and told the attorney general yates and james comey, there is no crime here by flynn,ya he's telling the truth, his recollection may be slightly different than we interpreted the transcript of his conversation with the
10:22 pm
russian ambassador, but that's not a crime. mueller thought he knew better. he wasn't in on that interview. if flynn's lawyers didn't know of the exculpatory evidence.e. >> sean: the judge's language sc firm, "i will decide what's exculpatory."l what do you make of these new texts and, by the way, we were going to have breaking news tomorrow.we i only have a preview tonight. it's going to be pretty damning as it relates to the love birds. what we do know that mark meadow's office pulled out,t what is this "again," you are going to have to get involved "again" in the -- >> they knew that james comey had for political reasons, at their behest by the way, had thrown the hillary clinton case clearing her. and then peter strzok is the guy who signs the papers opening the fraudulent investigation of trump-russian collusion without collusion being a
10:23 pm
crime. >> sean: you are the only one that pointed out collusion is not a crime,e, which is fascinating. >> every time i do, i get a lot of heat and fact check organizations go to these obscure professors from universities never heard of and they sort of begrudgingly say, well, that is true but, there might be three or four other crimes.ru and they cite those crimes. >> sean: are they cnn contributors? i can't help myself. >> i look up crimes and have no relevance toto collusion in a political campaign or facts relating to this. >> sean: sara, i hear there is a lot more coming, this is only 3,000 pages that they keep going back to and finding little nuggets. how many more pages are going to be available? >> imagine that. out of 1.2 million or more documents, pages, that the inspector general michael horowitz has collected and has used for his investigation,t so this is just the tip of the iceberg, sean. and you know as far as like
10:24 pm
going back to flynn, remember, mccabe was the one that ordered them to go interview flynn. g so this is going to be very interesting to see what they get. >> sean: all right. thank you, both. we have a jam packed line up tonight. geraldo rivera, dan bongino, the great one mark levinin weighs in on stormy stormy story and phony fake news straight ahead. ♪ my name is jeff sheldon,
10:26 pm
and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.
10:28 pm
♪ >> sean: welcome back to "hannity." here now with reaction to my opening monologue, nra contributor and former secret service agent dan bongino. also with us -- this book is amazing. and geraldo has lived a thousand lives in one. your stuff about war and your background. nearly 50 years in media and it's just incredible and so many memories i have in this book and i congratulate you.
10:29 pm
>> thank you, brother. >> sean: out in bookstores everywhere, amazon.com. okay. so the president, is it not a national security issue? >> now we will fight. >> sean: probably. >> i love you like a brother. >> sean: is it not national security to stop drugs, gangs, and potential terrorists from entering our country? >> yes. >> sean: so the president, as commander-in-chief, should have the authority to fund the wall with national defense money. >> the problem is when you are now messing for the allocation for the department of defense, this is not specifically their bailiwick, it would require, not a bad idea, and not a bad justification, ethically speaking. >> sean: he's the commander-in-chief. >> you need a congressional law apportioning where thehe money goes.. >> sean: national defense. >> if he could get congress to agree to pass a law, then i would agree. not by executive fiat. >> sean: dan bongino, he is the commander-in-chief, not
10:30 pm
paul ryan or chuck schumer or anybody in congress. he is the commander-in-chief and he deems this is a national security issue which it is, he would be able to appropriate those funds, and i think he will do it. >> any rational person will confirm this is a national security decision. it's not a secret to anyone other than blind liberals that international terrorists have been taking advantage of our porous nearly nonexistent in some cases southern border. this is a ground ball bunt decision. i applaud him if he decides to go forward with it it's the right decision. >> i have one thing to say about the law. i was at cleveland cavaliers game, go cavs.th they have a t-shirt gun that they shot up into the upper deck. build this 25 billion-dollar wall and some drug dealer get one of those t-shirt guns shoot the piles of fentanyl over the wall. the wall won't stop the drug
10:31 pm
it will stop the apricot picker. >> geraldo, that argument is not used for anything else. we don't say that about homicide laws. well, you know, homicide law is going to cause a slight obstruction, if you kill someone they may have to spend some time in prison, too.ct you don't enact a law for the purpose of absolutely black and white stopping an activity.bl you make it more difficult. so that argument that, oh, they are just going to build a ladder. okay, build a ladder and we will build a higher wall and you build a higher ladder. that's how this works. it's not a black and whitend issue. >> i said to the president of the united states himself, i said, you can make a deal voters and the majority of states said build the wall. get the 25 billion-dollar to build wall and give me 1.6 million dreamers a path to citizenship. >> sean: already offered that. >> that was a deal that can behi made today. today, but everyone started adding stuff, chain migration
10:32 pm
and cutting down illegal immigration and one -- they larded it up. they should make a deal today. a lot of people want the wall.ul build the wall if you want to spend the 25 billion instead of on schools and highways and so forth. i'm okay with it as long as you give these kids some security. >> trump didn't run on daca. he ran on building the wall. this is no mystery. you know what, i know it. >> sean: the democrats were offered daca. one thing about fentanyl being shot over with the cleveland cavaliers' t-shirt, it's funny but here's the thing, the wall, according to agents and the president is looking at prototypes, t they will be able to see through and they will be able to know if they are on the other side. if they are on the other side, our agents will be all over them. >> don't you agree?ov why not make a simple deal? you got the dreamers, which are going to be a sore on the president's side forever. >> sean: democrats do not want a deal. they want to run on it in 2018. >> because the republicans have offered them a three year amnesty for the dreamers, not a path to citizenship.
10:33 pm
>> sean: president offered daca in exchange for three things. chain migration, visa lottery, we know there are flaws in it because of recent attacks and he says he wants the wall. >> i want to say something that we all agree on now. i think i caught theim "new york times" in one the most egregious acts of partisanship you will ever hear about and i think too many people let this go unnoted.d. the headline in yesterday's "new york times" about stormy daniels reads "adult film star feared for safety of daughter after trump threat." headline, front page, "new york times," not after," "alleged" trump threat, notep after "reported" trump threat. not after "supposed' trump threat. it said after trump threat. the "new york times" has
10:34 pm
abandoned all pretense off objectivity toward the 45thns president of the united states. you can disagree about walls and so forth, but this is absolutely scurrilous. >> sean: last word, dan? >> geraldo, on the path to citizenship part, i don't know why you should assume that should be part of anything.ze you enter the country illegally.f i always asked this question. i will ask it of you. think about this when you are sleeping tonight,lee geraldo, what do you tell people like my wife who came to the country legally and busted their butts and thousands of dollars and lawyers. >> sean: how long did it take her? >> a long time.id awful process. what do you say to those people they get to come here illegally and gotten the exact same thing? >> kid comes 6 months old innd his mother's arms. has nothing to say about it. grows up -- >> sean: not talking about thebo kids. >> are you going to throw this kid out to a country the kid never knew? >> parents shouldn't have brought them here. times." >> shame on the "new york times." thank you. >> sean: thank you, dan. as we have been explaining the media has proven they will stoop to new lows as geraldo was just describing,g,
10:35 pm
to destroy and of course delegitimize donald trump's presidency and the stormy daniels hysteria is the latest example. here to weigh in on all of this, the host of crtv's "levin tv," the host of life, liberty and levin" the great one i call him. number one in his show's time slot. thank me. look, this is too serious. i'm watching anderson cooper. we did a side by side. jerry springer, cooper. because he asks the same questions as jerry springer asks.r and they have done this 24/7 for weeks, the same network that never interviewed juanita broaddrick until october of 2016, mark. this is not tabloid, this is agenda-driven, zucker-driven dribble because he has an agenda against donald trump. >> well, and they are getting ratings. you see what "60 minutes"
10:36 pm
did.s. they got the greatest ratings. >> sean: cnn doesn't have those. >> exactly. the truth is if donald trump's last name was kennedy we would not be seeing a thing of this. they would be covering it up. here's the difference. number one, why is it assumed that the porno actress and ex-"playboy" bunny are telling the truth and would why are the media focused on this? take a look at bill clinton. bill clinton was accused of sexual assault in the ovalbi office. bill clinton was accused of having sex with an intern in the oval office. bill clinton was accused as attorney general in an official position of raping juanita broaddrick. bill clinton was governor of arkansas, accused of using his position to try and get sex and exposing himself to an employee, paula jones. donald trump isn't even close. even if you believe all of this, he isn't even close to all this stuff. john kennedy had an affairir with a mob boss' girlfriend.
10:37 pm
john kennedy had a relationship with an east german spy. john kennedy had sex with an intern in the white house pool. i mean, so many examples, l.b.j. was said to be worse than john kennedy. i can go on and on and on. now media will sayay well, that's a diversification. i will tell you what's a diversion. the media have ignored the rogue activity the highest levels of the fbi. the media have ignored russian's influence in the election. we now know that the obama administration knew about it, susan rice knew about it, i told people to stand down. we got these lectures from mark warner and adam schiff, unbelievable they said the russians would get involved in our election. they are right. now that we know that the obama administration knewhe about it, vertically, horizontally, departments and agencies and did nothing about it. moreover, we know that lies were told to a federal judge at the fisa court to get a warrant to spy on an american citizen and then
10:38 pm
for a year they got threefo extensions. the media do not care about that.te so what do the media care about? the pornification of the media. last week it was donald trump is mentally ill and dragged out this professor from yale and pranced her one station to the other. before that kook with book michael wolff. nobody trusted him. anyway, he was good for a week. then we get to hear from this idiot for a week. it goes on and on and on. the media obviously hate trump. here what happens they are trying to do. they know trump supporters are not going to be persuaded by any of this. what they are trying to do is get the people out there t who don't really pay a lot of attention, who may not be trump supporters and keep driving the stake in, driving the stake in. grabbing anything they can, including a porno star who i've never heard of any of these people before. now they are presented to the american people as truth tellers. this anderson cooper -- i didn't
10:39 pm
watch this. you showed this on your showhi earlier, the questions he was asking.r has he no shame? is he not embarrassed? the children of this country to listen to a reporter go on and on about the kind of sex and when you had sex? >> sean: it's creepy. >> it's sick! it's sick. and i'm starting to think some of these reporters are enjoying sitting at their computers doing research on daniels, whatever her name is, smoky daniels. >> sean: stormy. smoky, stormy, no difference. >> i don't know, they aree starting to get a kick out of it anyway, it's really pathetic. >> sean: i'm actuallyy crying. you know, jerry springer, we did last night a side by side, i think we have it in our control room. let me play this for you. this is a gift for the great one, mark levin, because i know you were busy last night. watch this. >> you told donald trump to turn around and take off his pants? >> yes. >> and did he? >> yes.
10:40 pm
>> you are young, you like to have fun.es >> yeah.ou >> you are a party girl, et cetera. so what's the story here? >> oh, lord. >> and you had sex with him?e? >> yes. >> do you want to be with her boyfriend? >> no, it's a one time thing. >> did you want to have sex with him? >> no. but i didn't say no. >> you are not interested in being with him, he is just a customer, right? >> oh. >> or are you interested inst being with him? >> he ended up taking me home. >> you work in an industry where condom use is an issue. did you use a condom? >> no. >> did you ask him to? >> no. >> so you had sex with him. >> yeah. >> sean: i don't even know what to say. that wasn't hard to do. and by the way, if they want to fight, i'm just starting. i think this will be more fun than i have ever had on tv or radio in 30 years. >> you know, sean, on aad serious note.w, the media in this country is as low as i have seen it before.
10:41 pm
it's not really the media. you've got a lot of people who've poured into the stations important to these newspapers that have minimal experience, very thing backgrounds, ideological agendas. we have north korea that is threatening us with nuclear missiles. we have iran trying to get nuclear missiles. we have russia not only interfering in our elections. we have rogue top officials at the fbi. rogue officials at the doj. we have this special counsel running around mr. closeau he who can't find the actual russian interference and obama administration standing down when all that took place, america is in a tough place right now. we are in a tough placeto right now, because the job of the media is to protect the people from the government. what the media are doing, what i call the praetorian guard media, they're the mouth pieces and scribes for the ideological left, for the democratic party. they are embarrassing themselves. anderson cooper will never live down that interview. e cnn will never live down that interview. the more they chase these
10:42 pm
sort of things and they are not serious, it's one thingng to have differences of opinion on substance and the more they bring out her slip and fall lawyer to go out there and make the arguments he makes, the more they degrade themselves. >> sean: well said, the great one, mark levin, sunday nights. 10:00 eastern. "life, liberty, levin." god bless us. when we come back, the under sheriff of orange county, california, he is defying california's lawlessss sanctuary policies. he joins us next. also, we sent tomi lahren out on the street to see what they thought of the sheriff's bold move. that's next. ♪
10:47 pm
♪ >> sean: all right, yesterday, the orange county sheriff's office announced they will reject california's sanctuary laws and actually help i.c.e. agents and enforce federal law. we sent our own tomi lahren to orange county to ask residents what they think of the undersheriff in this move, take a look. >> i can tell by your shirt that you are probably pretty excited about the orange county sheriff who is making the list of criminal inmates available upon upon their release, making it easier for i.c.e. to do their job. >> i support the enforcement of law and i want to see that happen, that's an important thing to our community.
10:48 pm
>> we should do as much as we can to find out certain criminals that are here illegally, they should follow the law. >> it's a bad idea. i think being a sanctuary city and all, we are supposed to protect, you know, each other and we're supposed to build bridges, i believe in building bridges and not walls, you know. >> i think we should be paying our immigration officers to do probably more to go ahead and do their job. >> what about making it easier for them to find criminal illegal aliens that are coming out of prison? >> yeah. should be extremely easy to do that. >> i guess if they are violent, sure. what if you had a ticket crossing the street like jay walking or something? >> coming out of jail though. >> you can go to jail for all kinds of things here. if you have unpaid traffic violations, you are going to land in jail. >> those people have that many kind of traffic violations are those the type you want living in your country that have no right to be here in the first place. >> most people don't want california to be a lawless sanctuary state. they want to be protected.
10:49 pm
they want the laws enforced. >> sean: joining us live from orange county, california, fox news contributor tomi lahren. orange county is not california. orange county is a more conservative area. but, if they go after this sheriff, this is where it gets serious and you heard the attorney general today, i wonder does that then mean that the oakland mayor aiding and abetting criminal illegal immigrants by telling them that they were going to be arrested and giving them an opportunity to get away? now they are going to be reciprocity? this could be an all out battle. >> i think if the citizens of california, wherever they are honest with themselves, they want to be safe and secure in the state of california. again, talking to people on the streets today, that's what you heard. this community, even though it is somewhat conservative in orange county, where we is an immigrant community as well there are a lot of immigrants here.
10:50 pm
some of legal, some of them illegal. the illegal immigrants i spoke to although want what's best for fellow immigrants. they believe in the rule of law and want to be safe in their community they feel they're americans. that's what i heard today. >> sean: remember, the president said i want to build a big wall on the southern border with a big door. but just asking people to do illegally. >> that's what i have been asking people for weeks now. the left has dominated conversation about the wall and it's become a talking point at this point. if you break it down, people want security and safety they want immigration process to be reformed. they want common sense and the wall is common sense. the left has dominated this conversation and made the wall some kind of a demon object and it's not. it's for the safety of americans. >> sean: all right. thanks so much, tomi, for doing that. joining us with more on that california, under sheriff don
10:51 pm
decision is the orange county, california, under sheriff don barnes is with us. sir, first, i want to applaud you secondly i took what your attorney said in california as a threat. in other words, he would almost insinuated he might try to arrest you for just putting out who is in jail and when they are getting released. isn't that legal? >> well, it is completely legal. under the law was passed under senate bill 54 there is a provision clearly cannot do. we cannot communicate with immigrations and customs enforcement, but it says we can make this information available to the public, which is exactly what we have done. we are following the law and have an obligation to follow the law. >> sean: doesn't the state of california, oakland mayor, i.c.e. was trying to enforce laws against criminal illegal immigrants. those who committed other crimes beyond that which was not respecting our laws and sovereignty. if i were to give people a warning that you were about
10:52 pm
to go in and hold them accountable for crimes, would i be abetting and obstructing justice? >> potentially. that would be a little bit of a stretch. this is what we are very clearly doing, we are going after very serious offenders who are in custody in our jail. being convicted of very serious crimes. sb-54 allows to us notify i.c.e. on those under the trust act which was passed in 2014, previously passed legislation, and that's what we are doing. we are still notifying i.c.e., the sheriff has that discretion. last year we turned over 580. we have 57,000 bookings. so that's a small percentage or actually just 58,000. this year we have already turned over 181. but 244 individuals were not turned over to i.c.e. and that's what we're concerned about. so they are very serious crimes and they are be being returned back into the community. quite honestly, back into the communities they preyed upon and committed their crimes to begin with.
10:53 pm
we are trying to help the community to be safer by turning these individuals over to i.c.e. and not letting them return to the communities and commit more crime. >> sean: do you have a response to the attorney general and the comments that he made tonight? because i took them as a little threatening towards you. >> well, they were threatening. i would say my hope would be that he would read the language of the law that was passed. it very clearly says in there what we can and cannot do. we cannot communicate with i.c.e, in and of itself, returning us back to a pre-9/11 condition legislatively where we can't talk with other federal law enforcement agencies. that's problematic on its face. but it also has a provision where we can't make this information available publicly. it's information made available publicly and every inmate within our custody of the jail who has a sentence expiration date. not those here illegally. every inmate in our care has that information posted online.
10:54 pm
we are not designating anybody. anybody can sift through that information. >> sean: sheriff, if he does do anything, i promise you i will do everything in my power to help mobilize people to assist and help you in any way we can. thank you for standing up for the rule of law. >> you are welcome, sean, thank you for having me. >> sean: renee come back an incredible display of emotional camaraderie. it will break your heart. that's next. just one free hearing test at
10:56 pm
just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter... music... life. call now! for a limited time, you can get $500 off miracle-ear hearing aids!
10:58 pm
they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again
10:59 pm
>> the video of the day depicts a heartbreaking display of comradery. thousands of new york city firefighters and firefighters from all-around the country, theyrk lined the streets of new york city today, to pay tribute to one t of their own who died while battling a five alarm fire last week. 37-year-old michael davidson. 15-year veteran firefighter fighting a basement fire on a movie f set in harem in new york on thursday night. according to the new yorkni pos. davidson got separated from the rest of the unit, after they were forced to retreat, due to the severity of the flames. davidson ran out of compressed air and collapsed while trying toed escape. during the funeral service held at st. patrick cathedral remembered "hero of the highest order" he sadly leave bez hind a wife and four children. hed is an american hero. and our thoughts and prayers are with him and his family. if there is a good fund me page
11:00 pm
or scholarship, we will let you know. go bless that family. very hard. anything to say, we'll see you back tomorrow. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham is standing by. >> laura: thanks so much. i'm laura ingraham. this is "the ingraham angle." we have a line-up not a single moment. the trump administration is causing democrats to lose their minds again. announcing its plans to ask, wait for it---- a citizenship question on the 2020 census. how dare they. plus a de beloved figure on the left is revealing what we already know and we know liberals think deep down about guns and the 2 nd amendment. and the pc mob puts one of america's most important historic figures at the top of its target list. but first the all
156 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Fox News West Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News ArchiveUploaded by TV Archive on