he said he would shake things up. i mean, this might come as a shock to you, but -- >> have you looked at the news? now things are worse. >> not on the real news. >> oh, puh-lease. >> sean: we are out of time, laura ingraham in the house, how are you? >> laura: your interview with mercedes schlapp was awesome. she should be the next white house communications director. she is fantastic. >> sean: i love her, i love matt, and i think she is a good choice. >> laura: she knows him, she knows the terrain. >> sean: even what you get paid, and do get paid a lot. >> laura: i have seen that project of yours. sean, thanks so much, sean. i'm laura ingraham, and this is "the ingraham angle." we have some huge developing stories tonight. orange county, california, has

just become ground zero for an uprising against sanctuary state policies, one of the officials behind that fate is here tonight. plus, at best the watchdogs of the department of justice is launching a probe into the alleged fisa abuses by obama administration officials. and anger mounts over the death of an unarmed black man by police officers in sacramento. so good this controversy put liberal activists in a major bind? first, hollywood discovers america. that's the focus of tonight's "angle." ♪ on the surface, roseanne barr seems like an unlikely conservative superhero, but there she was last night, reviving her eponymous tv show that went off the air 20 years ago. now, she is playing her old character, at this time as a true blue trumpster dealing with

a family member. >> i know so many families that are divided over the election still, and they still are fighting and stuff, so we wanted to show that and how our family it deals with it, and we all have the hope that people will start talking to each other again, because that is what we need. >> laura: did you see joy behar's face? she wasn't buying that at all. when the original sitcom "roseanne" debuted, think about this, reagan was finishing his last year in office, and the nine seasons later, bill clinton was in the middle of his second term in office. oh, my goodness, how things have changed for america in the interim. i have to tell you, it didn't surprise me one bit. i think we predicted it last wednesday on the "angle" when the ratings came in ensuring roseanne had absolutely crushed it, nabbing 18 million viewers with the debut. that's awesome. now, for years, the

entertainment industry has moved ever further to the left, pumping out films and television series that often offend or they just simply don't resonate with millions of americans with a slightly more traditional sensibility. and it's producers push the envelope on political issues and depictions, even during the so-called family hours on television. well, they may have create some favor with the viewers on the coast, but i am telling you, they lost many others. and the people they lost? they needed a reason to return to broadcast television. and last night, "roseanne" gave it to them. you know, i have long wondered why the decision-makers in hollywood hadn't seen the writing on the wall sooner. how is it good business to deliver good content that, right off the bat, half of the country is going to be repelled by? member, 14 years ago,

mel gibson's "passion of the christ," its premier and ultimately racked up over $600 million in total domestic and foreign box office. evangelicals and catholics flocked to the film over the easter weekend, many seeing it more than one time. it was an absolute tour the force. so one would have thought that the industry would have seen that success and tried to replicate it, but they didn't really do that. it was almost as if the entertainment executives force themselves to look at the other way and write off conservative success in their world as some kind of strange anomaly. but roseanne barr took the audience seriously, and she was willing to reflect who they are fairly, even their politics. >> i think the voice of working people is absent from televisio television, and i think we always had that, and we have it again, and there's nothing on

television like it. it reminds me a lot of when we first started, there was nothing on television like our show, and it's still that way. >> laura: she is a true innovator. and roseanne shows us that trump voters, they are not monsters, they are not deplorable for os, and, no, they are not stupid. they are real people with the real james who get into real fights and they grapple with health crises and money trouble. and what about the show "the middle," that's another big hit, another middle-class family, they go to church and they love each other no matter their dysfunction. and who can forget, oh, my gosh, i loved "everybody loves raymond." that ramp are nine hilarious seasons. and then, of course, remember tim allen started in that well-rated "last man standing" which was curiously canceled last summer despite the fact that it outperformed on friday night. it, too, skewed conservative.

but let's face it, for too long, many of you have felt increasingly isolated from the popular culture because the popular culture seems to have nothing but ridicule and disdain for you. so not surprisingly there was a pent up her yearning for exactly the type of show that roseanne barr produced. we'll families, families, real problems, and real intrafamily l laughter. so will be huge success of "roseanne" mean we can expect to see similar efforts on other networks? i wouldn't hold your breath. over the years, i have had the chance to meet some of the folks whose job it is to green light some of these series, and they actually admit that they have alienated a wide swath of the american public, but they don't really seem to care. they seem more worried about what their friends and their colleagues will think of them, maybe at cocktail parties,

dinner parties, if they back a conservative-themed show. so despite all the talk of diversity and inclusion, and giving each other ribbons and awards, hollywood remains stille of the most intolerant industries in the world. and insular as well. you try going on in addition, being known as open the conservative? good luck. the liberal dogma is extremely difficult to crack, and the powers that be make exceptions once in a while, but it's usually for only those stars with huge names, people like jon voight or sylvester stallone or roseanne herself. in the meantime, millions of tv viewers are voting with their eyeballs, and they are looking forward to see where ms. barr takes this working-class narrative, maybe right up till 2020. and that's the "angle." we are going to unpack the

reasons for this ratings bonanza and are seen and unseen segment coming up with raymond arroyo, but meanwhile, the conservative enclave of orange county california has just become the epicenter of the fight over the sanctuary state policy. yesterday in an amazing move, the orange county board of supervisors voted to condemn california sanctuary law and is now joining a u.s. justice department lawsuit that claims the entire system out there is unconstitutional. joining us now with the reaction is orange county supervisor michelle steele, a legal immigrant who, get this, was called a racist b word over her willingness to cooperate with i.c.e., along with a former california justice commissioner. great to see both of you. let's start with you, michele. when i read what they said about you with your background, i'd

like to say i was surprised, but i wasn't, because if you book the liberal trend in california on an issue like immigration, they feel like they have free license to call you any name in the book. tell us how your life has been in the 24 hours since this decision was made. >> come my god. i'm very happy about it because i was the one that actually introduced the resolution, because our local police and law enforcement agencies, their hands had been tied, so we really have to work because, as the supervisor, orange county the public safety comes first. because it is interesting, you can hear that i speak korean, japanese is my second language, english is my third. i went through the legal process as a legal immigrant, and i was called racist b, when you get called these names, you have a long line, , life, so i'm goingo

have a long life. >> laura: i know you don't support calling michele names, i'm not dragging you into that -- >> thank you. >> laura: that's terrific, i know you condemned that let's talk about what happened since the big face-off with the trump administration. california is sitting on large company, 3 million people, revolt against that. do you blame orange county for voting the way they did given that they don't want orange county to turn into san francisco, meaning, they don't want to hypodermic needles in the streets, they don't want the homelessness problem, and they don't want to crime, they don't want one san francisco has clement doubled the rate of the state crime rate. >> in san francisco's defense, we don't want any of that stuff either. but as far as what orange county is doing, this, i think, is just another political stunt.

it's a lot like what the federal government is doing. i question whether or not the supervisor's resolution will get past the attorneys on this. the lawsuit that was followed by i.c.e. was filed on preemption issues, that the federal law preempts state law, i think that law has been settled. nobody is arguing that state law preempts federal law. i think what the feds are saying is that we are interfering by telling our citizens and by telling our state representatives not to enforce immigration law, and i think the only way the defense is going to win on that argument is if there is some sort of federal argument attached to it, otherwise i don't see a way of winning it. as far as orange county is concerned, they don't have jurisdiction here because preemption is not their argument. >> laura: if we get into preemption, we'll lose the entire viewing audience here. let's get right to the nut of what is going on here. we have a resolution in

orange county that now requires that you announce, michele, correct me if i'm wrong -- -- u announce when a prisoner is released, correct? you announce it so people know when they will be released. why would anyone be against tha that? >> the last three months, we had 172 criminal aliens who were released on the street. as a supervisor, i already told you, and it's the public safety that comes first. immigration is under federal law, and then this is totally unconstitutional law in the state that they just created. they created chaos between local government and federal government working together. so this one has to be stopped. that's the reason that jeff sessions sued, and now we are -- >> laura: it's about safety, let's just boil this all down, guys. this is about safety. this is about security.

this is about the well-being of citizens, and citizens of the united states and illegal immigrants. i want to play for you, this is xavier beccerra talking about this yesterday. >> state law is state law, and it is my job to enforce state law, and i will do so. we want to make sure that every jurisdiction including orange county understands with state law requires of the people in the subdivisions of the city of california. >> does that mean a lawsuit against the sheriff's departmen department, or? >> laura: so i'm picturing this, because we have had these types of horrific crimes. an illegal alien rapes a 10-year-old girl and does his time and then is released. there are sanctuary politicians who believe the federal government should not be notified and that individual should be put back out in the street in a sanctuary state.

joe, is that when you are in favor of? >> no, no. if you are talking talking abot somebody who has been tried and convicted, i am not one of those people who believes that should be back out in the streets. that, to me, is a violent criminal. what we are talking about though is due process, because a lot of the people, the supervisors are talking about, being released on jail, and some are being released on bail, o.r., these are people that have been arrested, not prosecuted and dried. people in the united states, unfortunately unfortunately for i.c.e., it requires that people be tried -- >> laura: but joe, they're in in the country illegally. they become an immediately deportable alien. they are in country illegally. they announced it, then i.c.e. can pick them up and get them out of the country. we ask like these people we are

talking about are american citizens. they are not citizens. this is not their country. they came in illegally. now they want the red carpet rolled out. michele, go ahead. >> we can go back to san francisco, because sanchez, convicted seven times, who was deported five times, the city of san francisco refused to transfer him to i.c.e., and guess what happened? kate steinle got killed. that's why we want to get out of the sanctuary state and against the sanctuary states orange county can be safe. we always want to become safer, decide to put the list of inmate released release. >> laura: x information.

>> it's almost ridiculous. >> laura: the sequence of the se going to get arrested and illegals will get a released. the illegal immigrants get to go free. final point, go ahead. >> the sheriffs will have to follow state law, and the county -- if orange county wants to challenge state law, they should file a separate lawsuit. i don't think this is the right place. i think this is a political stunt. as far as the kate steinle case, horrible, horrible circumstance circumstances -- >> laura: how many americans have to be sacrificed for this fantasy that open borders is a good thing? i keep asking, how many americans have to die in duis, be brutalized, women be abused, domestic abuse, children be, horrible things be done to them, how often does this have to happen until people say, no more, cannot do it anymore.

>> citizens and not do citizeno that. >> laura: like san francisco doesn't have enough trouble with the homelessness crisis, with the filth in the streets, the report that came out a couple of weeks ago. if i'm san francisco, i want to try to clear our act here, but you want to bring more people in who cause more problems. i don't understand that, i will never understand that. we are out of time, guys, joe, we appreciate it, michele, thank you very much. up next, the doj is saying it's going to investigate whether the fbi broke the law when it spied on american citizens. will we finally get answers on how obama's fbi expired on the trump campaign? details i had photo and got an estimate in 24 hours. my insurance company definitely doesn't have that... you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™

liberty mutual insurance. ♪ directv now gives you more for your thing. your letting go thing. your sorry not sorry thing. your out with the old in with the new, onto bigger and better thing. get the live tv you love. no bulky hardware. no satellite. no annual contract. try directv now for $10/mo for 3 months. more for your thing. that's our thing. visit directvnow dot com doespeninsula trail?he you won't find that on a map. i'll take you there. take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales.

oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. (avo) get 0% apr financing on all-new 2018 subaru outback models. now through april 2nd. at a comfort inn with a glow taround them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com." who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom.

book now at choicehotels.com.

>> laura: wow, it's a big nose rattling washington tonight. the department of justice department of justice's inspector general is officially investigating whether the fbi or the doj broke laws when it used pfizer warns to spy on an american news investigation, most likely carter page. reverse learned of this when the house and talk many memos declassified, it details how the fbi used an unverified dossier funded by the democrats to spy

on mr. page. i've long so the inspector general is key to getting to the bottom of what happened here, and to discuss further, let's bring in bob goodlatte, republican from virginia, here reporting on that, byron york, chief political correspondent and fox news contributor. big news tonight, congressman goodlatte, there has been stonewalling taking place for months and months and months. 3 million or 1.2 million documents, you've got 3,000 documents. maybe it's just too many documents you want. maybe the copy machine is broken. what is the justification for this delay? >> well, the department does not have a good justification for the delay. the attorney general and the director of the fbi, christopher wray, have both acknowledge that to me. they now say they are hard at work getting those documents ready for us.

the requirement of the subpoena that i issued last thursday is that those documents get to us by next thursday. in the meantime, we are pleased that the inspector general has announced that he will also look into this matter. but two things. one, the inspector general can't look at it from the same perspective that congress can or from the perspective that an independent special counsel can. and secondly, the inspector general should get out his report with regard to the investigation he has been conducting for the past year with regard to how the fbi has handled the clinton email investigation first. we need that information out now. then he can go on and look at the other matter. in the meantime, we need the documents that we have subpoenaed. >> laura: byron, i want to go to you on this. jeff sessions has kind of come around on this. this has been going on -- this rigmarole, as my mother used to say, has been going on for a

long time. >> very little trust going on, because this has been going on a long time. remember paul ryan said the fbi was stonewalling to house intelligence committee months and months and months ago. >> laura: why does jeff sessions now see it as a problem? >> i think there are a couple of reasons. you know the texts between lisa strzok and carter page, saying they were having an affair, we had to reject the personal stuff, well, a couple of members of the house judiciary committee had been going over and looking at fuller versions and finding out that some actual real official material evidence was left out of those, was redacted, so there was zero trusts there, and i think the fact that the judiciary committee is sending people over to look at this

stuff has probably told the fbi they are not going to give up. >> laura: chairman goodlatte, when you think about these texts and "news tonight" broke that denis mcdonough, of course, the white house chief of staff for barack obama, was mentioned, and at least one, looks like more, texts between strzok and page, and i guess the concern is, what? the concern is the white house was not just kept abreast of this investigation of the trump campaign, but you see it online, people were wondering, were they directing it? if so, that's a big problem. >> it is a very big problem. we are not passing judgment on that at that point, but you can't make a decision in the congress about what is material over at the justice department. we have another example. we know that peter strzok and

lisa page were talking by the federal page who was appointed to the fisa court and mr. strzok said, oh, he's a friend of mine, i'm going to meet with him. we don't know if anything wrong took place in whatever meeting they had, but that was material that was withheld from us by redacted materials. we need the unredacted material. >> laura: there are too many instances of either an appearance of a conflict, perhaps an actual conflict, political affiliation going back to hillary or the clinton foundation and now this. contrary contreras is a friend e and strzok. i'm telling you, this gives everybody a sense that this investigation from the beginning was the insurance policy, was an insurance policy in the fall of 2016, heaven forbid, should something happen with hillary,

maybe her health, or who knows, maybe donald trump was going to win even though they didn't think they would come up because when you see dennis mcdonough on those texts? >> a lot of them thought republican president, republican congress, than the justice department will cooperate with the republican congress, and that didn't happen. what they didn't realize, apparently institutional prerogatives and back-covering back-covering -- >> laura: it's called the deep state. >> they were stronger than any desire to actually cooperate with the republican congress. you have seen this adversarial atmosphere develop between people in the same party. >> laura: there is one other saying, and i want to play it over, but senator blumenthal was on cnn today. i would love for you, chairman goodlatte, to respond to this. this is about the expulsion of the russian diplomats. let's watch. >> do give the president credit for but many say is a very strong step, stronger than what

president obama had done. >> i give the president credit for expelling 60 russian intelligence officers. i think it is diminished in its force by the president's failure to, himself, break his silence on vladimir putin instead of pushing back as aggressively as he should. he congratulated putin on his election. >> laura: they have to keep on this narrative. the meal investigation, russia, prussia, russia. chairman goodlatte, you close this out. >> this is far beyond what a few democrats think of donald trump, this is about how the government, including possibly the white house and the obama administration, but certainly the federal bureau of investigation and the justice department, may have subverted justice in a dramatically different way than what they handled the hillary clinton email investigation and how they attempted to conduct an

investigation into the trump campaign. it is stunning how that contrast takes place here. and both republicans, democrats, and independents -- everyone should be concerned about this, because we don't want the same thing to happen in the next election. you can't have the most important law enforcement organization in the world conducting itself in the manner did in 2016 and on into 2017. >> laura: will look at a lot more news coming tomorrow night, and we're going to bring that to here on "the ingraham angle." 18 million people watched "roseanne" last night, breaking all records. why did it work" "seen and unseen" segment with raymond arroyo next.

i look like most people. but on the inside, i feel chronic, widespread pain. fibromyalgia may be invisible to others, but my pain is real. fibromyalgia is thought to be caused by overactive nerves. lyrica is believed to calm these nerves. i'm glad my doctor prescribed lyrica. for some, lyrica delivers effective relief for moderate to even severe fibromyalgia pain. and improves function. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions, suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worse depression, unusual changes in mood or behavior, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects: dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain, swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who've had a drug or alcohol problem

may be more likely to misuse lyrica. with less pain, i can do more with my family. talk to your doctor today. see if lyrica can help. pssst. what? i switched to geico and got more. more savings on car insurance? a-ha. and an award-winning mobile app. that is more. oh, there's more. mobile id cards, emergency roadside service... more technology. i can even add a new driver... ...right from her phone! geico. expect great savings and a whole lot more. termites, we're on the move.24/7. roger. hey rick, all good?

oh yeah, we're good. we're good. termites never stop trying to get in, we never stop working to keep them out. terminix. defenders of home.

>> this is the first dinner together we've had as a family we've had in a long time. let's try to survive it. first let's say grace. jackie, would you like to take any? >> i should have tried to understand why you voted the

crazy way that you did. >> and i should have understood that, you know, you want the government to give everybody free health care because you are a good-hearted person who can't do simple math. >> laura: at [laughs] as we mentioned at the top of the show, the "roseanne" reboot generated 18 million last night, finding what can happen when hollywood makes programming that is not condescending. join joining me to analyze this, in our "seen and unseen" segment, raymond arroyo, go out and get a little wilder. fantastic, let's going on with "roseanne"? >> is a safe, fun place for people to have a political conversation. i would caution you, she is not a traditional can't know my conservative. she voted for trump, she they e

dealing with the surrogacy, a daughter who wants to engage in surrogacy, a grandson who is cross-dressing, they are dealing with a lot of subplots here. this is not straight down the middle conservative to some, but that is what made it work. it's not predictable, it's not -- but look where it resonated, laura. tulsa, oklahoma, cincinnati, ohio, 29% of kansas city, missouri. 29% of that city. >> laura: remember that book that came out all those years ago? >> it hit middle america. >> laura: because middle america, and as i said in the "angle," feels tuned out and turned off to what is happening in popular culture. it doesn't reflect who they are. >> and this does, problems or hitting them, the american dream is something of the way it's supposed to. just to give you a sense of context, 18 million people watched it. when "will & grace" premiered, 10 million people watched it.

it's down to 4 million oh week. >> laura: the reboot, more of a liberal -- >> more people saw this then the stormy daniels interview. >> laura: it reminds me of what happened when "duck dynasty" came on, they were sitting at the table praying, they cared about each other, they thought, but it reminds me a little bit of that. >> laura: where whether it "roseanne" or "blue bloods," that is what it is. >> laura: "blue bloods?" >> tom selleck show." >> laura: oh, . sweet jesus ice cream? >> a lot of groups are up in arms, they want to boycott this, a canadian firm that is reaching out now into baltimore and minnesota, this is one of their ads, it looks like the little girl is a cannibal, but look at

the logo, it sweet jesus up top, and most of the logo, the suite has an upside down cross for the t, and that little -- see that, you see that lightning sign, that, some say, is a demonic sign referencing when lucifer fell from heaven like a lightning bolt, and so it -- >> laura: is it good ice cream? >> i haven't tasted it, i'm not sure if i want to. they are creepy and many of them anti-christian. they take biblical verses, turn them on their ears. things like "love is patient, love is kind, but you can't lick it." >> laura: it's always during holy week. you can get away with trying to intimidate and silence questions, insult them, intimidate talk show hosts because we have a certain point of view, some of us. the effort to silence or demean those with whom you disagree at -- >> the owners of the company say, we chose sweet jesus

because that was the explosive reaction people had when they tasted it. imagine if your reaction was holy mohammed, would you be able to put that? spoon quickly , going to netflix. >> she is the first person i think of. >> laura: her interviews on all of those sunday shows, that was entertaining. >> and the obamas are not going to netflix, barack obama is going to be doing, it looks like a talk show about issues, and michelle obama may be doing a type of show that you might like. >> that would be good. a lot of people are saying no to netflix as a result, i saw that trending, it has a hashtag, i just don't like a lot of the shows. >> i don't like the politicization. entertainment should be neutral, common ground. i think that's what people want. >> laura: will it hold next week? >> i think it will hold.

"roseanne" had a huge following before, like "the middle," like "everybody loves raymond," and if they stay true to the characters -- >> laura: you know what you want to hear, norman lear, i like to see what he has to say. >> his show was just renewed with rita moreno, solo, all of these shows -- >> laura: everything that is old is new again. raymond arroyo, everyone go out and get this, all smiled back. up next, protests over the police shooting of an unarmed black man in sacramento. the full story in moments. you could have money for repairs within a day. wow! that was really fast. that's insurance for the modern world. esurance, click or call.

this one's below market price and has bluetooth. same here, but this one has leather seats!

use the cars.com app to compare price, features and value.

>> laura: tensions are running high in sacramento, california, tinnitus protesters are demonstrating over the shooting death of a 22 -year-old black man, stefon clark. march 18th, two officers fired at clark over 20 times, believing him to be an armed burglary suspect. police thought he hadn't gone, but he was only holding a cell phone. the officers have been placed on paid administrative leave. since then, protesters have caused major disruptions to the capital, shutting down interstate 5 during rush hour last thursday, i'm two occasions, blocking the entrance to the city's nba stadium. at last night's game, the estimated 4,000 were in attendance, and marina that hold

17,600. yesterday's city council meeting also evolved into chaos with stephon clark's brother charting profanity is at the city's mayor while demanding justice. the unfolding situation, let's bring in retired lapd detective mark fuhrman. mark, walk us through the incident that night that resulted in this young man's death. 20 shots? i mean, i'm not the expert you are, but i find that to be appalling. >> we'll get to that, but i think it would be excessive for the situation that we are in. i think what's interesting for everybody to understand, this is a property crime the officers were pursuing a suspect, a property crime where, so far, we only know that vehicle windows were broken and one sliding glass door. no actual people were involved

as being victims. that's where we start. an air unit was actually above the officers, directed them to a front yard. initially they got the suspect to halt, but he took off running again into a backyard. that backyard was his grandmother's. now we pick up this whole incident on a body cam of the officers. what is really interesting to me is, the officers had a place of tactical advantage and cover at the corner of the house and they see the suspect who was in the open in tall grass and they say, "let me see your hands," and then without even hesitation, it is almost a run-on sentence, "let me see your hands" ," gone, gone, gone, and the fire starts. i do not like the situation with

the property crime escalating this quickly with the advantage of cover for the officers and an air unit that is above them using imaging to actually watch the whole situation. >> laura: yeah, they were watching it unfold, from above, unfold. >> yes. so the suspect is not going to get away. this is personal from my experience in the lapd, our tactics would be, get on the ground flat with your arms outstretched. you don't ask a suspect to see his hands. that's what he did. he showed in his hands, he had a cell phone. when you say "gun, gun, gun," he might think that is a gun and he might take some force, the ultimate tactical measure, but

the other officer also has to observe a threat before he can initiate deadly force himself. and they have to be responsible for each and every round that they fire, what they are seeing. but tactically it sounded like a rapid succession with no let up to evaluate the situation or the suspect, if he was down. >> laura: so, mark, for our viewers, the police need to perceive an imminent threat of bodily harm to themselves in this situation to justify that use of force? is that what they need to, in that moment, establish? >> every officer -- and i'll give you an example, laura. if you have a suspect coming out of a bank robbery, and one officer says "gun," that doesn't mean the other ten officers get to shoot.

every officer has to see something that he deems to be the action of deadly force needs to be used to overcome that threat. it's not, one person sees a gun. >> laura: mark, i have to ask you the race question, because the race question is what's motivating, i think, these protests, they are getting mild out there. people are very upset, and i would be upset if this were a relative of mine. but his race at the heart of this, do you think, knowing what you know now? there was a black police officer involved and a weight off police officer or is this, perhaps, bad police? >> they have an air unit directing them to a suspect tht is committing crimes. they have note self initiated contact with the suspect or a decision which to choose or who

to try to stop. at the moment of the shooting, you have a black officer and a white officer and the act exactly the same. it would be very difficult to call this a racial incident. >> laura: mark fuhrman, awesome as always. joy behar, of course, at it again, this time attacking melania. i'll respond next that five stars, two thumbs up, 12-out-of-10, would recommend thing. because if you only want the best thing, you get the #1 thing. directv is rated #1 in customer satisfaction over cable. switch now and get a $200 reward card. more for your thing. that's our thing. call 1.800.directv ( ♪ ) stop dancing around the pain that's keeping you awake. advil pm gives tossing and turning a rest

and silences aches and pains. fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer with advil pm. i'm the one clocking in when you're clocking out. sensing and automatically adjusting to your every move. does your bed do that? i'm the new sleep number 360 smart bed. let's meet at a sleep number store.

♪ >> laura: joy behar is something you can't shut off. shortly after offending christian center for their beliefs, "the view" liberal attack dog is at it again, this time melania trim. the stormy daniels controversy has, not surprisingly, captivated the critics, but ignore the impact it has had on the family, especially the first lady and her 12-year-old son, but enjoy's twisted view, expecting political opinions in the past for leads you from giving an ounce of empathy in the present. >> i can't really like her 100% because she is a birther like her husband. i interviewed her on my hln

show, i asked her that, , and se is on the same page as him on a lot of issues. >> laura: that hln show, i am so bummed it's off the air. by that same standard, no one can ever let joy off the hook for her list of insane political opinions and controversies, right? look, this is political hatred by association, pure and simple. enjoy it is not alone. attacks against the trump family have become the left's favorite activity. >> i know, we're, like, totally bugging us also. >> piece in the middle east, slapping him on the back. >> always estranged with a new york real estate sign, like they were going to solve middle east peace. >> let's go to the donald trump jr. story -- that sweet thing is such red meat for

everybody to mock and ridicule, we'll let it speak for itself. >> laura: well, that's not even a fraction of a fraction of them. i have to stay on air until next easter to play them all. have at it, enjoy, but to crucify them over things that happened long ago or to attack them for their last names is neither fair nor joyful. we'll be right back. i'm very proud of the fact

that i served. i was a c130 mechanic in the corps, so i'm not happy unless my hands are dirty. between running a business and four kids, we're busy. auto insurance, homeowner's insurance, life insurance policies. knowing that usaa will always have my back... that's just one less thing you have to worry about. i couldn't imagine going anywhere else. they're like a friend of the family. we are the cochran family,

and we'll be usaa members for life. save by bundling usaa home and auto insurance. get a quote today. ( ♪ ) only tena intimates has pro-skin technology designed to quickly wick away moisture to help maintain your skin's natural balance. for a free sample call 1-877-get-tena.

>> laura: before we go, a couple of tweets about tonight's show caught my eye. this twitter user wrote this about orange county getting tough on illegal immigrant criminals. "there are some great people in the oc. keep up the good fight because you are on the right side of the law and you will prevail." amy shared her thoughts on the "roseanne" reboot, tweeting, " "roseann was portraying trump followers as white trash. good writing but not positive." what's wrong with white trash?

she's cool on the show. i like all of your opinions. keep tweeting me. shannon bream is up next. shannon has lindsey graham on friday will be a great show, as always. shannon? >> shannon: he spent the day with the president. he will fill us in on that, laura. thank you very much. let's get you caught up on three breaking stories tonight. the inspector general at the justice department is starting an investigation into what republicans contend is bias at the doj and fbi and the russia collision investigation and those fisa warrants. we are learning that president trump has fired his veterans affairs secretary dr. david shulkin. senior north and south korean officials are just launching high-level talks to set up a planned summit in april with president trump. team coverage tonight, tomlinson standing by at the pentagon with why dr. david shulkin was locked up into his -- let's go. we begin tonight with chief national correspondent ed henry following the new pressure on the fbi.