hillary clinton book to her appearance. remember that. >> tucker: killed them dead. mark steyn, as always, great fall. that's it for us. join us tomorrow for the show that is a sworn enemy of lying come up from sworn enemy, pompy pomposity, and." groupthink. >> sean: breaking news, president trump refusing to back down in his efforts to secure america's borders. the president is demanding of all be belted he's revealing his details tonight about his plan to send the national guard out of southern border. the president is blasting unlawful sanctuary cities in the state of california when the mayor of oakland, california, who has shielded criminal illegl immigrants. we have the details and also look, tonight, fox news confirming deputy attorney general rod rosenstein has received chairman devin nunes' letter from the house until committee demanding that rosensteinin stop stonewalling record requests.s

be transparent with the american people. we have all of that plus tonight we are going to name names and expose who is the biggest liar in congress. which liberal democrat is at? we'll tell you later. we'll reveal that. and we have now even more explosive text messages just released a few minutes ago between the fbi lovebirds, trump haters, peter strzok and lisa page. catherine herridge reportingha that one text message indicates that peter strzok actually travel to london in early august of 2016 to interview a key witness. we'll have all of that and all of the details in tonight's important "breaking news opening monologue." ♪ as a president once again leading from the front. how refreshing. frankly, he's been dragging the weak republican party with him. he now tries to keep the promises he made tea you on the campaign trail, you, the american people. instead of being content with congresses inability to get things done, president trump

once again pressing ahead, trying to enact his agenda. this now includes renewing the calls for america to get much tougher, t much smarter on illel immigration, securing our country. here is what the president said, blasting these very weak, and effective immigration laws. here's what he said. >> we had very, very weak laws. we have the worst laws. you think catch and release, which we are terminating very quickly, we are doing it in pieces. a 1 foot hits our country, we have to take those people gently register them, and release them. we will release them essentially. we release them. and then they are supposed to comem. back for a court case. we hire more judges. we are trying to hire thousands of judges. no other country in the world -- we hired judges so that these people will come back. if you have a baby on our land,

congratulations, that baby is a united states citizen. we are the only one. i will tell you what, the laws of this country have to be strengthened andnd toughened up because it's crazy. we are going to have our wall and get it very strongly, the military is going to be building some of it but we will have very strong borders, and we have to change ourng laws. >> sean: the presidentnt is so right. right. so ridiculously idiotic, foolish, outdated, and they are constantly being abused. now there's a reason why just about every other country on the face of the earth, they do things differently. they are a lot tougher on illegal immigrantsme and mexico leads the way. the president is now taking matters into his own hands. last night, he signed the proclamation to send the national guard to the southern border to assist our border patrol with security until we can build the wall. today the president's income of between 2,000, 4,000 troops will be sent down to protect the southern border.he great idea, we will get that

done. a liberals of course are furious, even though there is a long established precedent for doing this. that's right, barack obama and george w. bush, they did the same thing. doesn't seem to matter toat the left in this country because they just oppose everything that president trump does. the liberal or oregon governor, kate brown is saying she will refused as a national guard troops from her state to the border if she's asked by president trump. the montana governor is saying he will never deploy the national guard. here's a question. do any of the states have opioid problems? in other words, drugs coming across the mexican border? watch this show on showtime called "trade." it gives you a lot of detail on where they come from. a battle appears to be brewing between the trump administration and the sanctuary state of california over whether california will comply with the president's plan. as we have been reporting on this program, california is ground zero for the left is resistance to thesi president's

attempt to combat illegal immigration. blasting sanctuary states like california and this corrupt aiding and abetting criminal behavior mayor of oakland. take a look. >> if you look in california, it's incredible phenomenon because injury cities, it's the worst. basically l a city can protect a lot of people that are bad people. how about the mayor of oakland? she tells a t thousand people to get going, law enforcement is coming to get you. this was all planned. many of them scattered. it was pretty much a failure. i mean, to me, that is obstruction of o justice. something should happen there.

it hasn't and i don't know why it hasn't but something should happen there. >> sean: yeah, that is obstruction of justice. that is called aiding and abetting criminals. by the way, it is not a daca. it is not dreamers. these are illegal immigrants in the country committing more crimes. she gave a warning to these criminal illegal immigrants that they were going to be deported by i.c.e. and give them the warning. because of the actions, we know that hundreds of people were able to avoid being apprehended. of borderoid being apprehended. patrol in jeopardy because your don't know what is going to happen after you warn them that they will be rated. also, liberal members of the mainstream corrupt media are losing their minds over the president's comments today about sexual assaults, rape, and violence that our committed by some illegal immigrants against migrant women. watch this. >> remember my opening remarks at trump tower when i open, everybody said, oh, he was so tough, and i used the word rape. o yes, yesterday, it came out come of coming up, women are rape-90 at levelss no one has ever seen before. they don't want to mention that. >> sean: here's a question for the left liberal democrats, all

these people that support illegal immigration in this country. all right, can you explain to the members of this country and our community and our family in america how it is so outrageous for the president to actually speak about the violence that is being committed by some against migrant women? think about this. if one american woman get rape-80, isn't that too much? if one american woman, let's say kate steinle gets murdered, isn't that one too many? and nobody seems to be saying that, all these people across the border, they are guilty of this. no one is sayinge. that, it's nt all people. we know people come across thee border, they want a better life, for their children, grandchildren. we're just asking, come legally. since the media is impervious to truth and facts, let us educate them as we always need to. earlier this week, the "los angeles times" reported on the caravans that moved through latin america and they founder

that robberies, rapes, assaults perpetrated by strugglers, cartel members, and mexican immigration agents are common in one incidence they pointed to a number of years ago, 72 kidnapped migrants were killed by a cartel in northern mexico. look at this report, same here. as many as a six of every central american women and girls are raped as they tried to cross into the u.s. amnesty international reports this. these numbers are disturbing. then there's the human smuggling, the trafficking. we play the tape numerous times, 642,000 crimes charging against illegal immigrants against americans in one state. that is, and, crimes against texas. including the most violent t crimes. for all the information we have, it is a very serious problem that is impacting people in our country.

what is so inexcusable about all of this is the left refused to respect america's right to sovereignty and security. not their families that are dealing with this, apparently. by the way, this includes all the facts and evidence. listen to this. under president trump, border crossings are down over 70% but congress refused to build the wall, we are beginning to see an uptick at the border. take a a look at this headline. illegall immigration of 200% ovr the past month in march after a senate legalization debate. people trying to come into the country illegal, guess what, there is nothing stupid about what they are doing. i especially people want better life. they know america's back door is wide open. and they know they can essentially walk and whenever they want. it also means people that are criminal elements, they come too, can walk in. that means gang members can walk in. that means people, even terrorists, can walk in. every american is in jeopardy. according to the department of

justice, asylum-seekers have an 88% percentage chance of avoiding expedited removal by claiming they have an "incredible fear." there is a reason why president trump's poll numbers are surging. why? isua very simple. he's actually keeping his word. his campaign promises. the american people like it, and they are responding positively, no matter how much they lie about him, attacked him on basically everything. this is a model for the rest of the g.o.p. and republican party. you want to win in 2018? keep your promises. fight for the american people. just basic, simple common sense and good business. we also have tonight huge developments in the house intel committee, chairmango devin nunes trying to get to the truth about the corrupt russia investigation.n. the fbi is finally responding tonight to chairman nunes and his request for congress to see an unredacted revision of the original document that set off this phony rush appropriate

misstatement, the fdic, they received a letter from chairman nunes and they are reviewing it. a general matter, before fbi records may be released outside the fbi to include congressional committees, they must first undergo our standard review and reduction process to ensure that statutorily restricted information, such as grand jury material, classified material, sensitive laww enforcement material, and other privilege material is not improperly disclosed. okay. they first requested this in august of 2017. they've had plenty of time to do their job. by the way, you want to protect classified information? why did you give hillary a pass? why did you exonerate here without investigating her? it sounds like you're the fbi is going to again refused to comply with the request to turn over the documents.

german nunes has given them until next week and he will subpoenas.week and he will how about we hold rod rosenstein in contempt of congress? he's the one stonewalling. never seen such a level of stonewalling. it's being led by rosenstein and it's reachingre unprecedented levels. seems that rosenstein is terrified that the american people will find out the truth about all of these nefarious activities, top ranking fbi doj officials during against the trump campaign. in other words, his friends. remember, rosenstein, he's a guy grovelingja for paul ryan in january, begging the speaker to prevent nunes from seeing the documents that later became the nunes memo. rosenstein clearly has his way, we wouldn't know anything about rampant fisat abuses. he has a major conflict of interest in all of this, he should have recused himself and he should be removed now. that is by congressman nunes is doing, you know, these things, which are so important.

the fbi, rod rosenstein, if they want and continue to obstruct congress from conducting oversight, then nunes needs to issue more subpoenas and hold these people and contempt. the deep state is scared to death because they know the truth is now being uncovered and what they did is now being exposed and also, we know it to be illegal. also tonight, house judiciary committee aid is telling fox news again, the doj has failed to meet, in this case, chairman bob goodlatte's deadline to turn over 1.2 million documents. this is now obstruction on their part. congress has a constitutional role. it is called oversight. it is called checks and balances. it's called coequal branches of government. remember? this is why it is critical that congress keep pressing for answers. one of the biggest liberalso trying to block this from happening, oh, our friend, democratic congressman, wannabe msnbc conspiracy host, adam

schiff. he is by far the biggest flaw you're in the united states congress. we have the evidence. here's why. for over a year, shifty adam schiff has been purposefully and maliciously misleading the entire country about what is really going on with her russia investigation. you don't believe it? take a look. his ever-changing talking points. you can't make this stuff up. he doesn't even room for his own lies. take a look. >> what what you got hard? >> unfortunately i can't go into the evidence. >> do you have something hard that you can't reveal? >> i can't reveal that, chris. >> there is one thing to say there is evidence, there is another thingro to say we can prove this or prove it beyond a reasonable doubt or if there's enough evidence to bring to a grand jury for i purposes of a criminal indictment. >> i don't think we can say anything definitively at this point. we are still at the very earlyn stages of investigation. >> we haven't seen in the actuao proof of cooperation and collusion. whatat am i missing?

>> i think you have to look at the pattern and chronology. the russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. the russians gave help, and the president made full use of that help, and that isni pretty damn damning. >> last march, you said you had more than circumstantial evidence of treasonous collusion with russia. please be specific. if it's true, i believe americans have the right to know a year later what that is. >> i certainly said there is ample evidence of collusion. i've never used of the word treason, only steve bannon used that word. if you look at the fax order in the public domain, they are pretty damning. >> the american people need to know if the russians have something they can hold over the president's head thehe united states. our work is not done. i can say with confidence that there is significant evidence of collusion between the campaign and russia. >> sean: collusion is not a crime. you are supposed to be a congressman.

nothing but a national embarrassment. you've had 14 months. this guy is pathetic. he can't keep its own story straight and he looked stupid on "the view," which by the way is a spectacular achievement. at this point, congressman adam schiff has zero accountability which makes him a perfect ability to be a cnn contributor. also, catherine herridge has recovered newly released text messages between the fbi lovebirds, professional trump haters peter strzok and lisa page and they indicate that strzok went to london in august of 2016 to interview a key witness days after the fbi opened russia investigation. interesting. he's the guy at the heart of all of this. according to these texts, the trump-hatingng fbi official, it appears to be, he and his lover debating what they will reveal to their bosses at the fbi when strzok gets back to washington, d.c. what do we tell them? how about the truth. aa week later, the texts seem to

reference a series of high-profile briefings beginning at the obama white house and on capitol hill. could the question is, who was strzok interviewing in great britain? could have been christopher steele? will continue to stay on that story. finally, hillary clinton needs to goo away. you know what? she can't except she's lost. she's regularly adding to this very,f very long list of people, places, and things, her stunning election defeat.e here's a horrible candidate, no message. it is pathetic at this point. i almost, not quite -- almost feel sorry for her. take a look at this list of hillary can't stop blaming. she's got a problem. it's scary. instead of constantly whining and complaining about losing, hillary is actually now trying to take credit. hillary clinton, for starting the me too movement. i didn't make this up. take a look.

>> i believe that it was a wave that was building and building and building. i think by losing probably accelerated it. but the wave was coming. >> sean: she's as delusional or maybe she thinks we are justa too dumb and will actually believe her. here's a news flash for hillary, she was best friends with serial abuser harvey weinstein, who has been accused of sexual misconduct by all of those women and according to the center for responsive politics, weinstein donated $44,000 to the clinton campaign, gave an additional 15 grand to a super packed, super pacs, ties to the clintons. so, hillary, no, you didn't have anything to do with the me too movement. instead, you kind of propped up people like weinstein and then there's this little uncomfortable truth that you viciously smeared, hillary,

slandered, hillary, and trying to discredit your husband's accusers. you threaten gennifer flowers, saying he would crucify her in a courtroom? you claimed that monica lubinski was a narcissistic looney tunes and refused to deny that you said it years later in an interview with diane sawyer? of course, you intimidated one need a broader after she accused your husband of raping her in a hotel in arkansas? we can forget how her family foundation took tens of thousands of dollars from all these countries that abuse women. hillary, we know you are better about what happened. here are some free advice. go fishing. stop talking. with reaction, nra tv contributor, former secret service agent, dan bongino. author of the best-selling book, "geraldo: the geraldo show." this comes down to a very fundamental issue as it relates to the president. there are people that have crossed with border, those weak

borders, and have raped people. nobody is saying majority. mostte people want jobs in a better opportunity. i've been down to the border, i've been to mexico. other people like kate steinle have been murdered. isn't one murder -- isn't one rape enough? the numbers of violent crimes are in the hundreds of thousands, geraldo, over the years. >> first of all, sean, we had a little earthquake here in california today. 5.3 on the richter scale. your opening monologue was a loy tougher than the earthquake. i also want to say before i start that i share your enthusiasm back to the president's approval ratings have now picked up and indeed, at least one survey, are about 50% for the first time during his presidency. >> sean: 51. one. >> 51. i do believe that this is where we disagree, i disagree with most of the audience watching this right now, i think this

immigrant crisis is manufactured. i think it is an overreaction to that so-called caravan of 1,000 that has now been broken up in the southern city of oaxaca. they are all seeking asylum in mexico. they are not coming this way. >> sean: you've seen the tape.ta in sat through a security briefing, and a seven year period of time, including root retail mike murder, rape, 642,000 crimes in total. you've seen me play the tape. how could you say that that is being overstated? >> i say it with absolute certainty. i say it, illegal immigration across the southern border is near 46 year lows. we did have a spike in march. probably having to h do with the demand for agricultural workers here in the south -- >> sean: let me bring down. if one woman gets rape ed, or oe

kate steinle get smarter, isn't that enough that we protect our americans first? >> sean, and absolutely is. i was listening to mark steyn the other night, he had a great comment. he said if you're an american citizen entering back into america at an airport, you get a cavity search. and then you have people who just casually walk across the southernut border, narco traffickers. we know terrorists are aware of the southern border. i know geraldo and i had a beef about this the other day but it's true. it's a fact. i know they are aware of the southern border. people have died and sean, there is a real price to illegal immigration.hy i don't know why geraldo keeps denying that. >> that is not fair. i do not deny that there is crime committed against these poor, vulnerable people coming from the south, fleeing

disrupted economies, drug cartels, gangsters, murderers, seeking a better life -- >> sean: we got to break. thank you both. the great one, mark levin, coming up. so i go national, where i can choose any available upgrade in the aisle - without starting any conversations- -or paying any upcharges. what can i say? control suits me. go national. go like a pro. and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll

everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

for nearly 2,000 severely injured veterans everyday life has become filled with barriers. day-to-day simple tasks can become pretty daunting. i have to carry my chair up two flights of steps or have somebody do it for me. what scares me the most is just the falling. when i'm struggling with my house, i think, you know, to have that one great barrier just knocked down, i mean, it's crucial. homes for our troops is a wonderful nonprofit that builds a mortgage-free, fully adaptive, handicap-accessible house. and there's no catch. it'll be our very first home that we've ever owned. this is a game changer. this is where your life begins again. we need you to join us in completing this important mission. please visit hfotusa.org

and help build homes and rebuild lives. because of you, everything's gonna be okay.

we are told that mueller wants to interview the president of the united states who knows nothing, who has been a witness to nothing, who , who knows nothing, who has been a witness to nothing, who is not a target of the investigation. what we are seeing now is conduct by took a public. robert mueller and rod rosenstein, that is unethical, unprofessional, and embarrassment to the united states government, and is undermining equal enforcement of the law. this is a perjury trap. plain and simple.

this is absolutely outrageous. it should end right now. >> sean: former u.s. attorney jojo jennifer on the program last night eviscerating deputy attorney general rod rosenstein and robert mueller.ea joining us now, george washington university law professor jonathan turley, a great columnme on "the hill," entitled "when will the media except that trump is not a terminal, criminal target." i will let you enter your own question. they seem not to want to accept that reality. it's been overn a year we've ben looking into this in a lot of varying ways. troublingys. pathology in the news, where people seem to be unwilling to cover what is positive news for president trump. there is not positive news, as well. rather, one-sided account is getting increasingly alarming. the fact is that there is not a strong, credible case of crime

that is emerging from this investigation. afterun a year, after hundreds f thousands of documents that have beenve turned over, after multie cooperating witnesses, after dozens of criminal counts, none of those filings have created a nexus between a criminal act and the president, or even the campaign for the most part -- >> sean: and collusion, professor, is not a crime, is it? >> it's not. we went through months were people were arguing, talking as if there was a collusion crime. the interesting thing isco collusion and obstruction, you have an exceptionally weak case that has emerged so far. i'm collusion, therere is an absence of evidence, and absence of anything connecting the president or the campaign, the last major filing said that no trump official knowingly engaged to russians in their hacking aspect of the intervention. there could be new evidence but we haven't heard of it. on the issue of obstruction, i think the president has what may be insurmountable defenses.

he could easily argue that he fired comey for cause. >> sean: rod rosenstein could be witness number one. let me ask you this. if there is no underlying crime professor, what you are saying and asserting there isn't, and he has the right to fire anybody, and there is no crime of collusion, and why would any lawyer allow a sitting president to be questioned by a special counsel? >> sean, first of all, we need to be careful. obviously, we don't know whatth mueller has. there may be more crime evidence. there may be more allegations to make but we haven't seen them so far and that is quite telling. the president's status hasn't changed in a year. he was a subject before, he still is a subject and not a target. as for the sit down, it's very hard for the president not to do that. the good news is that mueller is

asking about four categories where i think his defense -- the president's defenses are the strongest.t. the frontal attacks where the armor is the thickest. i think he could sit down and threaded that needle if he listens to his counsel and prepares for it. >> sean: why should he have to is the question? i'll ask mark lubin. what about article one that literally empowers congress for oversight purposes of the government? i only have about 25 seconds. doesn't the doj have to cooperate? thesee subpoenas went out in august of 2017. >> i agree with you on that. i have been a long advocate of congressional oversight authority. i think congress rolls over too readily. this has been too long. that material should have been turned over. i'm not too sure why it has not. at some point, congress has to think about using some of its inherent authority to say this is not a voluntary act.

we are an equal branch of government. >> sean: coequal, supposedly. professor, good to see you. >> thank you. >> sean: when we come back, the great one, mark lubin, weighs in on whether the president should ever talk to robert mueller. that's next.er. when you think of miami you

think of,you know,rich,glamour but 5 miles away from the beach there's people who have never seen a beach. i was confused why somebody was in this situation especially in america. ♪music:oooh,oooh,oooh so when i started joshua's heart foundation

it was a key thing to be able to engage youth in the foundation. to help them participate. ♪music:oooh,oooh,oooh i think passing on the torch and lighting a new flame in another person to do good is probably the point of the bigger missions i have. ♪music:aha,aha,aha so we are each making a bigger difference. ♪music:oooh,oooh,oooh that's it! just giving back and producing love for everybody.

♪ >> sean: joining us now the host of cr tv and a host of "life, liberty levin,," right on fox tv.ea governor palin will be your house this weekend. i look forward to watching. the big question now is with the president needs to do.ot apparently the president's lawyers are negotiating with a special counsel over the idea that the president would speak with robert mueller. the president himself says he has nothing to hide that he would speak with him. ifpe there is no underlying cri, if collusion is not a crime, and

the president has the right to fire otm or anyone else, and coy admitted as much, then the question is, if they want to get into the president's mind-set, you are thoughts can't represent a crime in my opinion. you are the constitutional expert. would you allow, if the president with your client, would you allow him to speak to robert mueller? >> no. i would not allow him to speak for his sake and for the sake of the office of the presidency. this is a rogue prosecutor. he's investigating nothing. you understand that? is investigating nothing. there is noer underlying crime. when he got his appointment, that by the deputy attorney general, the deputy attorney general did not provide any basis for theas appointment. that is, he didn't say, here are the criminal statutes they want you to investigate because there aren't any. i want to make a point that i don't believe anybody else hase made and this is very, very important for the president and the president's lawyers in nation. the official position of

united states department of justice under a democrat administration and w republican administration was set out by the office of legal counsel, the constitutional office within the department of justice, and two memorandum. these memoranda say that iff the president of the united states cannot be injected while he is in office. cannot. be indicted while he is in office. so he can't be a criminal target. the president of united states can't be a criminal target indicted. can't be that is the official position of mr. mueller's bosses overr there at the department of justice. is number one. number two, i keep hearing but what if he subpoenaed to appear before theap grand jury? subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury, then you go to the federal judge and you say to the federal judge, your honor, my client can't be indicted for you that is the position of his bosses. why is he going in front of a federal grand jury? we need him as a witness. a witness to what? what criminal statute or what

criminal violations do you think he was a witness to that he needs to testify to? we think he may have committed obstruction. even though we may not charge them -- excuse me, mr. mueller, this is a criminal grand jury. this isn't being done so you can issue your report. there are many constitutional obstacles, of course, to this argument that the president obstructed justice. so firing al subordinate as obstructing justice? that's absurd. if that is obstructing justice, when mr. mueller fired mr. strzok, maybe that is obstruction of justice, interfering with an investigation.at what i'm saying is, when i watch people come on tv and say, he could be subpoenaed. anybody cannot know mike could be subpoenaed. he's the president of the united states and you better have a strong reason for trying to drag him in front of a grand jury, number one. number two, a federal judge is not going to accept that kind of a spectacle. mr. mueller knows that way that is why they are trying to negotiate the kind of a deal. they will drag a president, who is dealing with all these issueg all over the world, who is dealing with china and russia, north korea, iran, so forth, and

bring him in front of a grand jury? the judge does not want that kind of aa constitutional crisi. that is why mr. mueller is trying to get wow negotiate some basis to interview mr. trump. if i were mr. trump, i would say, i didn't do anything wrong and that is exactly why i'mid nt talking to you. number one. i will protect this office for democrats and republicans who -- and you have crimes that you want to prosecute? go for it, baby. i did not commit a crime. i want to be indicted. i won't be dragged in front of a federal grand jury, and that's that. that's with the president should say. >> sean: let me ask you the next question. i think this is key. there is been very few of us that have done this deep dive into this, i would argue, corrupting that my robert mueller has put together. everyone has said that he is beyond reproach. i look at his handling of the anthrax case placed post 9/11. "whitey" bulger in boston, four innocent people went to jail,

100 plus million dollar settlement, two of the four died in jail. then you have the guy, andrew weissmann, "the new york times" calls him mueller spitball. that is the guy that as a result of his actions, twice was excoriated by judges for evidence by judges for evidence, tens of thousands of jobs were lost at andersonlp accounting for no reason, overturned 9-0 in the supreme court, you and i both know that doesn't happen a lot and a guy that spent four mural executives to jail for a year and that was overturned by the fifth circuit. wait a m minute, why would robert mueller, with his background, reappointing only obama, only hillary, only dnc donors, and corrupt people like andrew weissmann to be his team to be a spiteful? >> what are the democrats so keen on him and the media so keen on him? there's lots of leaks coming out of that operation, among them to "the washington post" the other day. he wants to put a report out by

june or july, where they will probably suggest the president committed obstruction of justice. not only is that outrageous, to the extent he does a report, it is supposed to be to the deputy attorney general on the crimes he is founder of the crimes he's prosecuting. he's not supposed to give opinions. let's be clear about something. the media treats this guy like he is a judge. he's not a judge. he's a prosecutor. there's two sides to every argument. number one. number two, he's going to put out a report accusing the president of the united states of obstruction of justice? when in fact that means the president of the united states will be accused of obstruction of justice for impeachment purposes? that should tell the president everything he needs to know, which is that mueller is out to destroy him. out to write a report a to givet to the democrats in the house of representatives. >> sean: we only have a little over a minute left. i would argue, he stepping into a perjury trap. there is no underlying crime and a candidate for president. >> defend the office of the

presidency and defend yourself. >> sean: well said. that's why t we call you the grt one. rodd rosenstein, he shouldn't even be in this position. number one. number two, isn't he conflicted out if he is the number one witness as it relates to obstruction with comey because he wrote a letter recommending that and in fact he extended the fisa warrant himself, knowing that this was bought and paid for hillary propaganda, russian lies, and appoints mueller? out iss a get away with that i o you see him in all this? >> i see him as very bizarre and really out of line. in addition to everything you have said, we now know that when mueller went into mr. paul manafort's apartment at five or six in the morning when he had his wife were invited, the fbi hadd their guns drawn, a warrant from the federal judge, when he went in there, gather information, and then he goes to thes deputy attorney general a

week later to have his authority expanded to cover what he had just done a week before. so mr. rosenstein expands his authority to cover the tracks for mueller who was doing things you should not have done. the reason why this is important, america, is this. mr. rosenstein is not the attorney general of the united states. he's acting like it. >> sean: sunday night, 10:00 p.m., governor palin will be mark's guest and you don't want to miss it. i'm watching every week. thank you, i great one. when we come back, incredible ugliness from thee left. he won't believe what they are saying about president trump, republicans, this crosses even a new line. newt gingrich is next. straight ahead. ♪ when trying to save

for the big things in life, we tend to start small. less of this. cut back on that. but if it feels like a lot of effort for a little gain, change that. start with something that makes a big difference... ...your student loans.

refinancing with sofi could save you $30,000. it's an easier way to reach your life goal sooner. we've helped over 195,000 people. we want to help you too. find out how much you can save in just two minutes at sofi.com/save.

♪ >> sean: the left's hatred for republicans in president trump, it knows no bounds. thousands into what what california senator kamala harris joked about with ellen degeneres earlier today. >> if he had to be stuck in an elevatorre with president trump, mike pence, r jeff sessions, who would it be? >> does one of us has to come out alive? [laughter] >> sean: does one of us have to come out alive? yesterday robert de niro was asked about the success of the "roseanne" reviewed. he took a shot and said "we are at a point a with all of this where it is beyond trying to see another person's point of view. there are ways you can talk about that. but we are at a point where the things that are happening in the country are so bad and it comes from trump. so many people that have left this administration, it's a serious thing. i don't care about "roseanne." "it sounds like dinero isn't

happy that there is a tv show happy that there is a tv show they want to watch. with reaction, author of the best-selling book "vengeance," he's been incognito, missing in action, former speaker of the house, newt gingrich. welcome back, sir, how are you? >> good to be with you. the fact i is, we are in the middle of a cultural civil war, and the language is the language of a civil war. people say horrendous things ani they mean them. i think on the left, all of the hostility, every single zone, if you look at people like marco rubio being charged with -- he is responsible for murder if he takes money from the nra. i mean, this is the kind of horrific language that makes it impossible to bring people together because they really are that far apart. >> sean: so the president is not. a target. we learned that and we know that "the washington post" is

reporting -- mueller is unlikely to indict trump, a sitting president. collusion is not a crime. and i am watching all of this unfold and he's going to issue a series of reports and all others. and then we see this whole other side where hillary steals a primary and hillary has the fixed income but we know she deleted, acid washed subpoenaed emails, breaks of different devices come all that happens, then we find out she's the one that paid for the phony russian dossier. you have a cover-up of the crime she committed with comey, strzok, mccabe, loretta lynch, they lie to a pfizer card. we have real evidence and proof. no evidence of trump-russia collusion. that is all the media talks about. of course, the president has a lot of success stories. nobody talks about that either. why? >> let me go back to a very simple model. we are in a cultural civil war. left, you never talk about your sites weaknesses

and you never acknowledge the other side's strengths. and of course, what's happening to the left is if you are an average american, you see more jobs every month, more investment every month. you see trump doing what he promised he would do. you see him standing up for america, and your choice is, left-wingers who think it's okay to have thousands of people cross the border versus protecting america. inch by inch, trump is actually organizing exactly like andrew jackson, a majority that i think we'll get him reelected, and that will actually be decisive in changing america's future. >> sean: you wrote a column, mitch mcconnell out there saying, republicans will face strong headwinds. we hear from anyone else in the media, a big blue wave is coming in b november. you believe republicans can win back in november. i think there is a lot at stake, not the least of which because

not the least of which because they wouldn't want to impeach donald trump and w then make upa reason if they have to. the reason is, what are the republicansub need to do to enact? >> let me remind everyone, having spent a lot of years as an old friendf campaigning, i ws behind 51-37 in september and my third campaign, having lost twice. i won that election 54-46. george w. bush, he was behind in may by 19 points, he won in november by six. that means one out of every five americans switched between may and november. by the way, we are a long way from the 2018 election. if we end up with the antitax cut democrats, the anti-semitic democrats, the socialist democrats, the nutcase democrats, the people who have

no positive solution for anything, if they end up being what the issue is about, we are going to win a shocking election. if we are passing slow and stupid and we allow them to define the election, we could lose. as it has for the republican party. the lead, greatest test of our lifetime. can we tell a simple story? trump today in west virginia did a good job. again, i'm an old-fashioned, tough -- i i believe in fightin. i believe in a real campaign. if we can have a real campaign, we'll do surprisingly well this fall. >> sean: mr. speaker, good to have you back. you've been spending a lot of time, your wife obviously is the ambassador to the vatican. thank you for being with us. whenwh we come back, our video f the. day. "hannity hotline," straight ahead. ♪ my name is jeff sheldon,

and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

( ♪ ) dr. mark shrime: five billion people around the world don't have access to safe, affordable surgical and anesthesia care. it's not something that we can ignore and hope that it fixes itself. don stephens: mercy ships is a unique organization. we bring all of the infrastructure services that we need to operate a world-class hospital, on a ship. it's a powerful tool. ( ♪ )

dr. glenn strauss: we experience how lives have been changed, how people have been transformed simply with the gift of surgery.

>> sean: all right. >> ary early early today i'm a fan of corn mc gregor involved in's strange backstage after a

press conference. it was not another fighter he was mixing it up with a bus. i'm not sure, take a look. >> i think he won. bus lost. time for the hannity hot line. you are an embarrassment to the irish ways and to the republican party. >> sean, do me a favor, what reading your love letter at the end of your show is kind of puky read the other once not just the love letters? >> whatever he is drinking i want some.

and whatever. doesn't matter. follow us on instagram on twitter and that's all the time we have left. we will be fair and balances let not your heart be troubled. you like brian. you are on every show. >> i'm doing my best you learn fru. have a great show, katie. >> thank you. >> good evening i'm katie in tonight for laura ingraham this is the ingraham angle. freaks out about trump sending tropes to the border. speaking of get being stories wrong did the obama administration put out a false narrative about the pulse night club terror attack? >> a town in illinois troying to ban assault weapon system that what the west wants for the count row? first the revolt against sanctuary policie