most watch, most trusted, most grateful you spent the evening with us. good night from washington, for "fox news @ night," i'm shannon bream. ♪ >> tucker: we start with the fox news alert. a rented van plows into a crowd in canada, killing nine people, injuring more than a dozen. a suspect has been captured tonight. good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." beliefs are looking for a motive behind this deadly attack. dan bongino and mark steyn with us in just a moment. first we go to jeff harrington life for us in toronto. >> the suspect at this point has been identified as 25-year-old alex minassian. he is from richmond hill, ontario, just north of toronto. it 's linkedin account says he a student at a college here in toronto. tucker, let's talk about that confrontation with police, when police got up with the alleged

suspect, alex minassian. it appeared that he may have had a gun pointed at police or a cell phone, the other report going around, it will take some time to get that confirmation. tucker, he was even shouting things, "shoot me, kill me," that willt be part of the investigation as to whether there may have been mental health issues at play here. says atdian government this point, the 25-year-old alex minassian is not associated with any terrorist group and so as such, there is no national threat here tonight in toronto. >> tucker: thanks a lot for that. dan bongino is a former secret service agent and an nypd officer and he joins us tonight. dan, you just heard that, the government of canada saying there is no connection, no obvious connection, and therefore there is no national threat. how do you assess that? >> well, you never know, tucker.

you don't know how many of these statements are political and how many a are based on investigatie leads. it is sad that we even have to think like that. when it comes to incidents like this, there is a reluctance -- and i understand, i get at that you don't want to get people -- you don't want people to be may be.whatever it we shouldn't be letting politics get in the way. if it turns out to be a mental health issue, it's as tragic either way, but he's not connected to a larger terror group that's fine. i don't think being cryptic about it really helps. >> tucker: why would that make us less afraid? there seems to be a theme here. every big city in america, certainly on the coasts, is packed with w people with mental illness, diagnosed or undiagnosed, living on the street, and crimes -- it's not an attack on anybody, and acknowledgment of reality, this kind of thing is increasing. why are we not treating it like a crisis? >> we should do. you're right.

the intent, i think from this case, is clearly there, regardless -- let's separate check on things, tucker. intent and motive. motive is up in theve air. maybe mental health, may be terrorism, may be neither. but the intent is clearly there. two things jump out to me from the publicly available or partnering. the witnesses said he hit "every single thing." if your contact points are people onhe the curb and you managed to hit every single one of them, clearly there is some evidence of intent there. secondly, there is no evidence there of any screeching brakes, any effort to slow down whatsoever. so clearly, we clearly know there was an intent to harm, and you are right. this is a big deal. we've seen an uptick in the use of vehicles to kill people in these horrible attacks. again, being cryptic in the law enforcement arena, i just don't think helps them as a new social mediaia era. >> tucker: attacks using

vehicles have been increasing in frequency around the world. i wonder if there comes a point where even the people in charge of our country admit that limiting access to the weapon, in this case a vehicle, isn't really a rational response. at some point, you have to talk about, why are people doing these things? you think this will spur that conversation finally? tucker, i hope so. we have focused way too long on kind of a dull mic and environment approach. putting out these fires afterwards with ridiculous mom measures outlaw inviting people don't worry about. we've seen it in the gun-control arena. you have to focus on an arsonist approach, we should be starting investigatory fires, doing better control at our borders. we should be generating better surveillance capabilities on some of these people. we should develop a better warning system for mental health

problems. instead, you see these kind of, you know, after the and they are just absurd. you've seen it in the gun-control debate over and over. >> tucker: mindless cable news chatter. focusing on the weapon to the exclusion of the motive. dan, thank you. great to see you. there is a lot to assess in the wake of this attack. we don't we don't want a motive for what happened but we don't need to to draw larger conclusions. people didn't use to drive vehicles onto crowds, they didn't used to shoot up schools either. easily. available tf up and stod out because of what happened today are what happened in this country for years. that and theyrive use to come if people have guns, that is not the point, no matter what they telloi you. more people want to hurt strangers than ever before for some reason. the bronze that holds society together are obviously fraying. why is that? you think our leaders would be thinking up to my cart about these questions since it's the

only question that matters and staying up late to do to make a solution since that is their job. instead, they are obsessing over fill in the blanks, creating a diversion. creating atr diversion. instead, they are seizing the moment, trying to strip our rights. some wacko martyrs in a sense, you are no longer allowed to defend yourself in your own home.ge that is the left. ice is recruiting on the internet, a perfect pretext to t down twitter accounts we disagree with or do you monetize your youtube channel. instead of fighting extremism, the left uses the existence of extremism to shut down legitimate dissent and self-defense. in other words, for the crimes of a few, all of us suffer. meanwhile the people in charge become more powerful. that is the scariest part of maybe the whole point. author and columnist mark steyn joins us to break down what is going on. at some point, do you think the conversation becomes, why would someone want to kill strangers? wire an increasing number of people wanting to go strangers? why aren't we having that conversation?

>> because i think the people who run, not only canada, but the entire western world now, i don't want to admit that they no longer have control over the situation. this part of toronto, which happens to be my hometown, i was in his neighborhood a couple of weeks ago for a bar mitzvah, all of the streets have english names. the school is named after a commander of british forces during the great war. they've got streets called princess and empress and there is one named after the governor general of canada. you can't find anybody with names like that in that neighborhood now.. it's become largely chinese, korean, there is some iranians, there's moroccans, jewish people, in this case, somebody with an armenian name. if you look on a society has just one big stamp collection, and it's nice to have one of

, then the modern western city is a great place. but in these multicultural hot spots, grievances developed, regardless of whether it is a global phenomenon like jihad or peculiar mental health issues. and then you have a situation where the jihad guys have a lot of mileage of taking trips, driving them on the sidewalks, killing large numbers of people. you can't reasonably expect that to be confined to muslim jihadists, sooner or later, and armenianit name, armenia is 99.% christian, i think there's -- last time i was there, 600 muslims in the whole joint. when people see that a car can kill large numbers of people,

you can't expect people to say, oh, that is just a muslim weapon. that is for the jihad. eventually, other people start renting cars and driving them on the sidewalks. >> tucker: if you are running a society, and benefiting from it disproportionately as our leaders do, wouldn't you spend a little bit of time thinking about how to hold it together? what makes a cohesive, successful society, society that will for example wage a war on its own behalf with the foreign adversary? why wouldn't you think about that? i don't get the sense anyone thinks about that at all. >>al they actually think in opposite terms. in canada particularly, you saw last year, in fact, for the dominion of canada 150th birthday, justin trudeau celebrated it by awarding $10 million to a jihadist sprung from gitmo who killed an american. in other words, multiculturalism lets you decide which side of the war you want to be on,

whether you want to be on the home team or the away team. that is how good multiculturalism is. you talked about how they use these incidents to take away our rights. and some sense, it is actually more basic than that even. setting the rights to one side, i notice now n when you are in london, and berlin, and brussels, and paris, and now presumably in toronto, they are trying to put bollards over every strip ofg raised pavement so that cars can't get up onto the sidewalk to kill people. so the price we pay, in effect for not having bollards around the national border, we now have two ugly up our alaris cities and have bollards around everything, on the new york bike path. everywhere you go around any western city, looking uglier and

uglier because our leaders have in a sense established ugliness as the organizing principle of the multicultural city in the 21st century. >> tucker: that's right. this is what happens when you put can security consultants, rather than have a tell mike an end thinking about what it takes to have a happy, cohesive security. >> i would like us to soften the target, think about the issues in a bigger picture sense, not just bollards around everything in sight. >> tucker: that's right. mark steyn, thank you. that was deep and interesting. mark will be back to react to kanye west's endorsement of "dilbert" endorsement cartoonit adams. plus a college professor in nebraska using her free time and her state subsidized salary to harass the children of an nra employee. why should you and me and every other taxpayer in this country

be forced to flaunt her lifestyle? a job for much she can never be fired. that story and many more next. ♪ ter than all the rest ♪ ♪ better than anyone ♪ anyone i've ever met ♪ i'm stuck on your heart, the best just got bigger. ♪ i hang on every word you say applebee's new bigger bolder grill combos. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

sometimes you need an expert. i got it. and sometimes those experts need experts. on it. [ crash ] and sometimes the expert the expert needed needs insurance expertise. it's all good. steve, you're covered for general liability. and, paul, we got your back with workers' comp. wow, it's like a party in here. where are the hors d'oeuvres, right? [ clanking ] tartlets? we cover commercial vehicles, too. i think there's something wrong with your sink. we cover commercial vehicles, too. with tough food, your dentures may slip and fall. new fixodent ultra-max hold gives you the strongest hold ever to lock your dentures. so now you can eat tough food without worry. fixodent and forget it.

hey, want thedone.est internet? and now, xfinity mobile is included. you can get up to five lines. you can save 400 bucks or more a year, which you can spend on a funk-tastic music video. ♪ dance party boom. ♪ simple. easy. awesome. come see how you can save $400 or more a year with xfinity mobile. plus, ask how to keep your current phone. visit your local xfinity store today. >> tucker: a fox news alert. president trump and >> tucker: a fox news alert. president trump and first president macron have departed for mount vernon in virginia. they had dinner there. tomorrow the president is scheduled to hold a joint press conference with his french counterpart as well as stage a state dinner. we'll continue to follow the events of the french presidents state visit to washington. america's public politicsin

receive hundreds of billions of dollars in government funding. what is that money being used for? in many cases, to employ radicals whose main job is attacking this country and the rights of normal people who live here.. at the university of nebraskars for example, anaglyph professor took time off to stock nra employee chris cox to his family home in alexandria, virginia, where he lives with his wife and small children. she staged a protest outside of cox's house, she had a sign that read "chris cox's profits off dead kids." we reached out to the university of nebraska, who gave a cowardly and meaningless response, saying we don't know anything about that. we don't care, it's not our business. jason nichols is a professor and he joins us tonight. professor, is this okay? is it okay to decide that, because you disagree with someone, you can show up at his house and scream at his wife and kids? >> is it okay to stage a

protest? absolutely. >> tucker: at someone's home? >> obviously she was not there for any kind of conflict. you remember the nra -- a member of the nra, i'm assuming he's armed. >> tucker: i'm a member. way too. it's not about being armed too. i hope that we are not suggesting -- i am asking a philosophical question. we disagree, is it okay for me to give your home address out for my viewers who disagree with you to show up and talk to your kids about how much they disagree with you? >> if they want to protest something they believe -- >> tucker: the answer by the way it is no. >> you putting my address out -- if you wanted to come directly and stand outside of my house with a sign and look like pretty much ttiavted a -- that will bo you. >> tucker: how do you think your family would feel about that? people with signs attacking you as a kid killer were screaming outside your house, how would they feel about that? >> again, i don't have many of the details, so i don't know how

far of a distance she was away. >> tucker: right outside the house, old town alexandria. >> she was not on the doorstep, i know, because then you could call the police. >> tucker: the principal -- i just want to make sure that i'm hearing this right. you are defending the idea -- we are not talking about rights. she has a legal right to do this. a right to scream at nuns and to give the finger to elderly women if you want. you can do that. the question is, should you? is it okay? do normal, decent people do that? do you think it's okay to do this? i think it crosses a reallyar clear line into indefensible behavior. you are asking me am i going to show up at some right-wing politicians house and stand outside with a sign saying "baby murderer" no. i'm not going to do that. do i think that that person, what i'm talking about is their first amendment rights -- >> tucker: your forgetting the love doesn't forget about the

first amendmentr: breaks because that's absurd. >> tucker: look at the polling. the majority of college students believe the first amendment is not absolute and it's less important than preserving the feelings of others. the left does not believe in the first amendment. the polling shows such. >> i disagree with that. at least the people that i know are 100% open to people's right -- >> tucker: again, that's not the question. by the way, there was someone arrested for vandalizing the house. >> that person deserve to bearor arrested. >> tucker: is this a new precedent?pr we got into a point where the left as a side of the personal is political and vice versa. there are no real limits. why wouldn't you screamld at someone at a restaurant? >> i think screaming at somebody at a restaurant, that is not legal, that's not a legal protest. >> tucker: actually, it is. >> that's harassment. if you are across the street with a sign and you are staging a protest, i've seen protests --

>> tucker: s i've seen a lot of protests -- >> planned parenthood -- >> tucker: i'm not against that. but if you showed up at somebody's house with his kids home, that is a threat. you know where the nra headquarters is, everyone does, there is a massive building, go there whenever you want. you find somebody's house, can you say unequivocally it's wrong? >> i can say that i agree with you that that is not the way i was stage a protest. i believe absolutely they should have gone to the place of business. however -- >> tucker: why should we subsidize this? why should taxpayers -- >> they are not subsidizing her. >> tucker: of course they are. spades 70 grand a year. she works very little because she is a professor. i'm serious. compare the hours the average person in her position works compared to the average person and most other jobs. >> we are not subsidizing her protest. we arere subsidizing whatever it is she does of the university. >> tucker: how about this. if this college professor from

the university of nebraska whom again, the college, and a very cowardly way, refused to comment on, if she were out of staging a protest in favor of the confederate flag, and she were coming up to the home of a black lives matter member and waving the flag and screaming, would you say, that is freedom of expression, the college should not get involved. >> as long as it wasn't a threa threat. >> tucker: can you sincerely sayre this? if milo yiannopoulos had a teaching position -- i'm serious -- >> that would be a problem. >> tucker: oh, it would be a problem because you don't agree with him? >> not because i don't agree with him, because he doesn't have the qualifications that it takes to teach. >> tucker: oh, the qualifications. >> tucker, if you want to teach -- >> tucker: have you been to a college recently? >> tucker, do you want to teach at the university of maryland? i will help you get that position braids. when i am not qualified, as you know. >> i believe you are.

>> tucker: if milo yiannopoulos -- he only uses soe because i know he is reviled on the left -- if he got the qualifications, whatever parchment or whatever, and got a job at a college, and was leading this protest, you'd be cool with that? >> if he was leading his protest from -- >> tucker: on college campuses in his spare time as ae college professor -- [laughs] >> one of the things we found that studies show is that -- and there is a study of 7,000 college students. it showed that the views of the professor have no effect on the views of of the student. >> tucker: i just want to note for the record you are not affirming milo's right to work at a college, subsidized by taxpayers and espouse his views in -- >> if tucker carlson wants to come to the university of maryland, i would absolutely support that. you have the right. >> tucker: what an interesting conversation. professor, thank you.

>> always fun. >> tucker: almost two years of searching has produced still no evidence of collusion with russia during the 2016 campaign. the dnc has filed a lawsuit over it nonetheless. we'll explain why they did that coming w up. ♪ erse. yes. do you think it's going to surprise your daughter? absolutely. wait, is mom here yet? where's mom? she's in this car. what the heck? whoa. yo, whose car is this? this is the all-new chevy traverse. this is beautiful. it has apple carplay compatibility. do those apps look familiar? ohhhhh. do you want to hit this button? there's a hidden compartment. uhh, whoa. mom, when i'm older can you buy me this car? i wanna buy me this car.

>> tucker: >> tucker: a russian attorney, if you recognize the name, that is because in 2016, she became famous for meeting briefly with donald trump jr. your number this was a smoking

gun of russian collusion that you heard of four months and months on cable news. that one meeting was going to influence it, if you were to conduct an investigation intoow the election, she would be one of the first people you would talk to. i was as far weird? in a recent interview with the washington press, she said that she was never even contacted by of special counsel robert mueller. she's done no interviews with federal investigators. that is what she said. how cann that be? if it's true, it's shocking, but only shocking if you still think this investigation is actually about russian collusion. if it is, ignoring veselnitskaya does not make sense. this investigation isn't really about pollution are russia and it never was. it was an attempt to unseal election results from day one.. we did not want to think that, didn't want to come to that conclusion but now, it is too obvious to ignore. joel payne is a former director

of the american advertising for hillary for america and he joins us. thanks for coming on. there's a lot we don't know. i'm taking veselnitskaya, whom i've never mind i know nothing about, at her word, that she wasn't contacted by investigators. if that's true, stipulating, there is no other explanationex other than mueller isn't really after more than a year and a half looking into russian collusion because how could you skip? >> if we will take this lawyer afterward, we have to take robert mueller at his word, he has been very responsible with the investigation, and there is probably a reasonba why she hast been contacted yet. the investigation is not done. if she has something material to the case, they will talk to her. >> tucker: material to the case? she is the case, as least as that's been understood publicly. there's been a ton of leaks. we know a lot. she met with the president -- >> we usually don't like leaks. >> tucker: i'm a journalist. i like leaks.

i want them. they discredit investigations. i always want to know. here's the point. ignoring her isn't possible if what you are trying to discover is whether or not the russians played a role in the outcome of the 2016 election. i think we know for searching this investigation,in whatever else it is, it's about something else. shouldn't we just pause and say, wait a second, what is this? >> tucker, i got to disagree with you. mueller, even the parts of this case i don't have to do with collusion, he is referred to the appropriate jurisdictions, the southern court in new york, you know that. robert mueller is a man of high regard. he's been lauded by democrats and republicans alike -- >> tucker: i don't care. >> it shows that he has manage this case the way that he should manage it. let's not -- >> tucker: you're making it personal. just to be clear, i'm not

attacking mueller. i have never wants to talk to him, i never will attack them cost to do it. i am concerned that the rest of us were solo me idea that we needed to investigate whether russia hacked our election, hacked our democracy. the other channels want wall-to-wall for over a year, telling our country,al we went o war with russia as a result. now it is starting to look like that's not even in play, it was not even relevant. why shouldn't i feel lied to? >> you shouldn't be like to because three larry significant members of the campaign team have already acknowledged that they had a role in wrongdoing. >> tucker: colluding with russia? >> we don't know exactly -- >> tucker: i read the indictments. members, whatever, papadopoulos papadopoulos -- here's the point. none of them pointed to anything

having to do with russia collusion. i've come at the end of all of this, we discover that nobody is charged for colluding with russia,y and there is no actual evidence that russia colluded, won't you have cost if you lied to? >> no. i know you want to talk about the dnc lawsuit, and i will bring it up in this regard. the dnc is trying to push the discussion, the public dialogue about making sure that we never have a situation like this happen again. we had a foreigngn government ty to compromise the results of our election. we will never allow that to happen. anybody, regardless of who you voted for, should care about that. >> tucker: so then why does the dnc push electronic voting? the only way to secure your voting against foreign interference in a foolproof way is with paper ballots. yet the dnc consistently pushes against that. they don't care at all about foreign interference. this has nothing to do with that. if they cared, they would be for paper ballots but they are not. why not?

>> i disagree with that. voting is not the issue. >> tucker: yes, it is. every state -- >> you are conflating apples and oranges. >> tucker: you are saying i should be concerned about foreign governments hacking our elections. i'm saying the number where they do is electronically. why don't we have paper ballots? every security person says this. >> i'm not blaming the fact that there is a light out two blocks away, i'm blaming the fact that somebody loved me and i want to figure out why they did it and they want to get to the bottom of it. >> tucker: maybe you should stop, to continue metaphor, stop taping $100 bills to your forehead because it increases the risk. if you really are afraid of foreigners hacking our election -- insecurity -- let me ask you>> this. the dnc is taking a position that it ought to be illegal to publish accurate information if that information has been taken from an email account. that would have prevented the pentagon papers, it was private information published publicly, it was accurate.

why would the dnc be attacking freedom ofof the press in this way? there is no way to read this. >> again, tucker, you know they are not doing that. the dnc is trying to do with the president is decided not to do, get to the bottom of why our election -- >> tucker: not taking the position -- >> any other take him out aser deflection. >> tucker: hold on. the dnc is saying and are to be illegal to publish these emails. i think that is what they are saying. >> in the absence of presidential leadership, we are going to push the issue -- they've done this before. they did it against nixon. they've sued to learn information about what happened in presidentiall campaigns befoe campaigns before. >> tucker:ug should be illegal for news organizations -- >> that is not with the dnc is suggesting. >> tucker: i'm taking it at face value. literally, they are saying that. >> tucker, you know go down while the dnc does not disagree with freedom of the press. >> tucker: oh, okay.

they are just calling for criminalizing it. i was easily misled. former u.s. attorney joe digenova weighs in on the dnc lawsuit and a possible prosecution a fired fbi deputy director andrew mccabe coming up next. ♪ you won't see these folks at the post office

they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again

♪ >> tucker: millions and millions of dollars have been spent, taxpayer dollars, our attention has been focusing on actual matters of state or significance, but on the collusion story, that apparentld swung with 2016 election. now we find out that the singular person at the center of this, this russian lawyer, veselnitskaya, has never been interviewed. she says by the independent cou. how cannot be? what does that tell us about the nature of its investigation? joe digenova has been watching carefully. he joins us tonight.

i just want to say, i don't have any information, she says she's not been interviewed. if that's true, what is that tells us? >> it tells us that this a fraud.tion has been it has nothing to do the collusion by the russians and they knew that from the very beginning. mr. manafort knew that from the very beginning because he knew that there was no basis for any of the fisa warrants. no foreign agents of the russian government involved from the beginning and that is why he refused to brief the gang of eight on capitol hill about the existence of the russian probe and the dossier for months and months because he knew if he briefed them, he would have to answer specific questions about the basis for the investigation and no basis existed. >> tucker: as a procedural matter, it's meaningful, can be fbibi director say no to congres when they say, tell us about something? can he say no? >> he kept it from them. they didn't know the russian probe, the counterintelligence probe, existed.

he kept it from them. if they had asked them, he have lied about it because he's lied about it ever since the opportunity arose. he unfortunately was confronted by the existence of the investigation and the failure to disclose that by a congresswoman during the initial investigations into this when the whole thing blew up. >> tucker: unbelievable. i would think that both parties, democrats think they will take control of the government at some point and theyde may, they have an interest in having an fbi that they can trust, that we can all trust. why is nobody on on the left calling for charges to be filed against the former deputy director of the fbi who, according to the ig, lied? isn't that perjury? what in that warrant a prosecution? >> there is no doubt that mccabe should be prosecuted. whether he will be remains to be seen. i think it's impossible not to know that they have charged michael flynn with lying and george papadopoulos and all ofrg these little people who have done absolutely nothing wrong. there is no way you can't charge

andrew mccabe. remember, he's a senior government official, senior law enforcement official, lied under oath three times according to the inspector general, no way be charged. >> tucker: we can be certain when the ig of the fbi issues its report that we can trust that, right? >> absolutely. i don't think there's any doubt that mr. horwitz has done an incredible job, no reason to doubt. in addition, the internal watchdogs of the fbi themselves, their own office of professiona, responsibility, the ethics watchdogs, said he lied to them. >> tucker: if you have a senior law enforcement official who lied under oath repeatedly about a criminal matter, why would he be defended by liberals? where are the civil libertarians on the left? >> the liberals are liberals anymore. they are progressives. it was the progressives who created the horrible movements in the 1920s and '30s. these people no longer think they are reacting, they hate the president, there are no principles anymore.

they believe that everything should be sacrificed for the thrill of having power and doing whatever you want to do to shove down the american people's throat. they have abandoned all pretense of believing in free speech, and believing in accountability, and believe it or not, they have become proponents of the fbi being aniz organization that lis to the american people. >> tucker: maeve spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to a senior law enforcement official who was fired for lying under oath on the left are supporting it. >> they are supporting it because i hate this president so much that they are willing to sacrifice the constitution and any core belief a that you haves a real liberal. >> tucker: unbelievable. really distorting a lot of people. joe digenova, thank you for your perspective. milo yiannopoulos was chased out of a bar by a mob over the weekend. a journalist who is having lunch with him joins us in a minute to tell us what that was like. stay tuned. ♪

child: bye, grandpa! and if you have heart failure, entrusting your heart to entresto may help. entresto is a heart failure medicine that helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. in the largest heart failure study ever, entresto was proven superior at helping people stay alive and out of the hospital compared to a leading heart failure medicine. don't take entresto if pregnant. it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or if you've had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto. and help make more tomorrows possible. entresto, for heart failure. entresto, we just switched to geico and got more.

more? they've been saving folks money for over 75 years. a company you can trust. geico even helped us with homeowners insurance. more sounds great. gotta love more... right, honey? yeah! geico. expect great savings and a whole lot more. ancestrydna has 5x more detail ...and it's now on sale for just $59. it can lead you on an unexpec ted journey... ...to discover your heritage. get ancestrydna for just $59. the lowest price of the year.

♪ >> tucker: you may have mixed feelings about milo yiannopoulos. many people do. if you are on the left, a you really hate them. you have never hated anybody, for some reason, as much as milo yiannopoulos. the effect is, milo yiannopoulos can't even go to a bar without getting driven out by screaming people. happened over the weekend. he went to a restaurant in manhattan. a crowd associated with the democratic socialists of america most ofs whom seem like rich kids, gathered, around him to chant "nazi scum, get out! >> nazi scum, get out! nazi scum, get out! nazi scum, get out!

nazi scum, get out! nazi scum, get out! nazi scum, get out! >> tucker: i wonder how many of those democratic socialists have their own student loans. probably none. they claim that the label is justified because some of philo supporters once made a nazi salute. though it's not clear that he did that. the mob included an editor at the nation magazine and also a gizmodo writer. we contacted him and his editor and they sent us the statement, which they were printed on the phone, "go f yourselves." chadwick moore is a new york journalist and he joins us tonight. here's the amazing thing tonight to to me. this was a restaurant called turtles, named after winch and churchill. it's on park avenue in new york, it has $16 sam appetizers and

that this was the venue the socialists chose to meet at? >> notice of a nationalistic british flags hanging around. they might have come for the crash of my craft beers. surelyly without this place woud be safe. we made reservations, we just wanted a simple sunday roast, we were looking forward to this. he's british, he probably hasn't had a good roast in a very long time.me we encountered, of all the gin joints in the world that we had to walk into the one with the socialists. >> tucker: they started screaming at you and calling you names, and what happened? >> we stepped outside for a moment and on our way back into our table, theyon were shouting, they would not let us go back to our table. we figured we -- we left our bags so we would see if we could just get our bags and leave out of respect of the staff. the other customers, you can see the videos, were scared, and running out with their children.

we tried to go back to our tabl table, they gathered around him, would not let us go back to our table, and then a very large, i think it was a woman, look like a womanish, shoved milo, that is when we realized it was going to get violent. it was just the two of us. we ask the staff of they would retrieve ourur bags of a dead vy and milo said i was a very big trump supporter and this is what that's about. the waitress was very confused. clearly not of the staff or patrons knew what was going on are understood to this. we were just two guys trying to have turk have a lunch. >> tucker: did you know that it was the meeting was in progress? >> i did not know they knew where park avenue was. their parents dow certainly. we made reservations at several days in advance, we just wanted an english roast. this place had come very highly

recommended. that was the end of it. i see on twitter, because the optics of this are so terrible, and they know how awful they look, i see on twitter, they are trying to say that we had planned this. certified salon reporters with the blue s jet checkmarks sayit milo brought his husband out, they kept trying to say that they did have some purpose, no. >> tucker: here's one of the revolutionaries, brendan o'connor, works at gizmodo, the kid we wanted to have on tonight. areas. he's obviously acting on behalf of the global proletariat. this is the kid who says he is a journalist but was there on behalf of the socialists. we checked, needless to say, from one of the richest suburbs of new jersey,f went to a $50,0 a year boarding school apparently. was he one of the people screaming at you? >> yes.

he a marched outside and try to doorstep milo. he shoved a recorder in his face and started asking questions about h month-old news stories that involved him and other things that had been debunked and veselnitskaya was very polite and said,lo i'm here with my friend. it if youfr want to interview m, please send an email to me and we'll set something up. he would not drop it. he didn't know what he was talking about, clearly nervous and fumbling. probably had no idea what to ask milo. finally, milo said "leave me alone, i'm here with my friend. get your facts straight. i will gladly give you a proper interview. then we have this "nation" editor, who admitted she runs the twitter handle for it, -- >> tucker: another worker! >> another worker. it is important to note, i don't have to tell you this, they were all white obviously. so she has been going on a storm on twitter, standing up for the working class, all those

precious -- >> tucker: there was a time when the t socialists cared abot economics and had an actual case to make. ii didn't agree with it but they had a reason to come a thought out case. it was fundamentally an economic case.fu then rich kids like this got involved and it became all about race and gender like everything is. chadwick, thanks for joining us tonight. is appreciated. we've we've invited brendan o'connor on and we hope you'll come on from gizmodo and hopefully he will come on tomorrow night and explain what heig was doing at churchill's, scene of the resolution revolu. up next, kanye west has come out as a supporter of "elder" creator scott adams because the world is weird enough as it it is. we'll discuss it with mark stey steyn. flonase sensimist.

this one's below market price and has bluetooth. same here, but this one has leather seats! use the cars.com app to compare price, features and value. happy anniversary dinner, darlin'. can this much love be cleaned by a little bit of dawn ultra? oh yeah one bottle has the grease cleaning power of three bottles of this other liquid. a drop of dawn and grease is gone.

tso why binge in here, when you can do it out there. with this clever little app called audible. you can listen to the stories you love while doing the things you love, outside. everyone's doing it she's binging... they're binging... and... so is he. so put on your headphones, turn on audible and binge better.

you agreed to never give up. to ask, what else can i do? you agreed to remember the good people who rise with every challenge, to remember their strength. to serve, with grit and grace. you made a promise. we did too. the all-new ram 1500. ♪ >> tucker: rappers love to collaborate but kanye west's latest collaborations are striking in bold new territory. he tweeted an endorsement of

candace owens. in response, "dilbert" creator scott adams created a videoed declaring that "kanye showed the way to the golden age." "new ideas will no longer be condemned by the masses. we are on the frontier of massive change." mark steyn hosted the show last week when i was gone and did a fantastic job. he joins us tonight. what do you make of this? >> i think one of the privileges of mega-celebrity like kanye west is that you be should allowed to be wacky. celebrities can be wacky. elton john was sitting on a balcony in rome and the wind was much and he called up the hotel manager and asked him to turn the wind down. the manager explained politely he didn't have the power to turn

the winds over italy down. you're supposed to be able to do that. you can be as wacky as you want except if you were to tweet out i got a bit bored with msnbc the other night so i tuned over to tucker carlson for a couple minutes. he was quite amusing in small doses. the left would go bananas. you can be as wacky as you want except for the ideological b straitjacket they demand you stay in. kanye west is simply getting itchy. he calls it mental slavery, and he's right about that. there's no point being the wealthiest person, most successful celebrity, a household name, on magazine covers, if you can't issue a seven word tweet without peoplem demanding that you withdraw it and denounce the person you are tweeting about. he is sick of it, and the wonder is only that more celebrities

don't get that sick of it as quickly as he has. >> tucker: the fully emancipated mark steyn. thank you. that's it for us. we will be back tomorrow. "hannity" right now. >> sean: welcome back. we missed you. welcome to hannity. we have huge developments to bring you surrounding the fbi's investigation into so-called trump-russian collusion. according to devin nunes, no actual intelligence was ever utilized to start the russia probe. none. that's right. it's day 341 of mueller's investigation and questions still surrounding why the fbi's initial inquiry into the trump campaign was kicked off in the first place. t an incredible development. so much for fair, open, transparent system of justice. also tonight, james comey is on the second week of his book tour and he finds himself in big trouble. according to the office of the inspector general, the disgraced former fbi directois