♪ >> kimberly: i'm kimberly guilfoyle along with juan williams, brian kilmeade, dana perino and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five" ." yet another storm in washington over one of president trump's nominees. this time, gina haspel under the microscope at her confirmation hearing wednesday. the cia director nominee appeared on the hill today to meet with senators in advance of the hearing. administration sources confirm gina haspel is willing to withdraw about the controversy of her role in the cia's controversial interrogation program. the white house is firmly standing behind her.

>> she deserves quick confirmation without partisan theatrics. the bottom line, acting director haspel has an unparalleled understanding of the cia and is the right person to lead them during these dangerous times. she wants to do everything she can to make sure the integrity of the cia remains intact, isn't unnecessarily attacked, and if she felt that her nomination would have been a problem for them for the agency, then she wanted to do everything she could to protect the agency. at the same time, she wants to do everything she can to protect the safety and security of americans, which is why she is 100% committed to going through this confirmation process. >> kimberly: the president tweeted his support earlier. "my highly respected nominee for cia director, gina haspel, has come under fire because she was too tough on terrorists. think of that, in these very dangerous times, we have the most qualified person, a woman, who democrats want out because she is too tough on terror. win gina!"

even people who used told us role think she's the right fit for the job. >> with a president who doesn't always attach his decisions to the real world, to data, evidence, gina haspel is the one woman i want in that room when everyone else will be going into saying you are right, boss. gina haspel won't. >> kimberly: coming out in strong support of gina haspel saying this is the exact person you want in the room and making the decisions in these tough times, dealing with terror. >> greg: i would call that a backhanded compliment. we need to have her because the president is crazy is basically what he said. i wonder, what do the democrats want? they never want an adult. who do they want? dr. phil. apparently they don't think a woman who can do the job. if they can do that to republicans, republicans can do that back. this is a byproduct of team

sport politics. the other team cannot make it easy for your nominations to get through. it has nothing to do with qualifications, expertise or talent. they have to do it because you are not on the same team. the other thing, the long-term consequences of stuff like this, you will be punished in the future for the brave choices you make in the past. how will it influence present-day patriots when they have to do with really, really tough choices in terms of people being threatened or it could be an impending attack and you have to decide well, am i going to sacrifice my future and make a decision that could be looked upon later as illegal? or do i just not do that and just make the world less safe now? that's the thing that scares name. >> kimberly: so true. what are they expecting, the democrats. going to make a choice that perhaps they think is okay because someone who is put in charge of terrorism and making sure we keep america safe seems

too tough on terrorists? >> dana: i think the president has his finger on the pulse of were the american people are on this. we have proven that again and again, being tough on terror. john brennan, who was a superior to gina haspel, was confirmed to be cia director, and he did not go through this kind of scrutiny. on so the fact that she has come under president trump does leave a lot of room for questions and homes of the strategy politically. just a moment to talk about her. after 9/11, she was one of the men and women that were asked to do really tough things. she wasn't the lawyer. she was the intelligence operator. the lawyers at the justice department deliberate over all of this, and they say here's where the law is. i can't think of a better way to empower terrorists than to take our men and women in intelligence, what greg was saying, basically make them second-guess themselves.

should i, can i, what i? they had the legal clearance. they did really tough things. they caught people, i don't want to call them terrorists, like collegiate mohammed. there were three terrorists who went through the waterboarding. it's no longer available to be used unless this president or this justice department or congress decides to change it. the senator from oregon said why her? so many women who could do this job. actually, exactly her. 33 years dedicated to public service. she asked to be transferred to counterintelligence. she was transferred on septembe. doubts her first day on the job. i think they deserve a lot more of our support than this condemnation decades later. i do think she will be confirmed. the democrats are choosing a

really unfortunate reason to try to put her through the ringer. let her get through. she is going to be confirmed. steve that it's a good point you make. she should be respected, chosen, based on the majority of her body more, protecting the country, working at and undercover operations. >> dana: i hope i can add one more thing. i don't usually like to say this but what it means for women working in government for her to stick to it, take the support of the president, go forward and be confirmed is so important. she spent 33 years there. it takes a long time for women in government to get to these positions but government is where women can really make a difference in leadership. her going forward, standing tall. she has nothing to be ashamed of. she has everything to be proud of. it means a lot for women behind you coming up through the ranks if you go through this confirmation.

>> kimberly: i dedicated -- i dedicated career. they don't get paid much. they work very hard, make sacrifices. she should be chosen not because she is a woman but because she is the best choice in candidate. >> brian: president obama comes in. eric holder says we're going to go after the enhanced interrogation. leon panetta says back off. then people say wait a second. doing something the justice department allowed me to do to stop the next attack. if you read jose rodriguez's book, you read what the cia men and women did. no doubt they stopped the next attack. not only do i hope she embraces her role in the black sites and enhanced interrogation. i think she should do it with pride. i think she should invite people to have this dialogue. i did what i was supposed to do. i am proud of what i did as an american. i follow the law. i am very proud of it. for 32 years, to get to the point where i am deputy, now

acting. if you want to give me the job, do it. if you don't like what i did, he should've stopped, you shouldn't have allowed us to do the program because it was signed off by everyone. it comes down to votes. rand paul, he was an eye doctor at the time. perfectly qualified to comment on this. he doesn't want to vote for her. if the others have any hope of holding onto their seats in red states, they better vote for her. for her to say i don't want to be ronny jackson on wednesday and then have to run to the cia to say come on back, we are going to fight for you. it shows me the white house was slow to back her. they did not get the campaign going. if pompeo couldn't get 60 votes, she is saying why do i want to not only not get the job at room and my reputation at the same time. i am horrified and embarrassed for lawmakers who will not run to her defense right now. >> kimberly: you are right. she should be celebrated, say what a strong, outstanding choice the president made, and

she is willing to continue to serve the country faithfully despite the efforts of those trying to besmirch her reputation. >> brian: she stopped the next attack. she was part of black sites. >> kimberly: women and young girls growing up should look up to someone like this to say i can be anything i want in life. look at the strength who have come before me. >> brian: if i could add one more thing, of all the acting director's bacteria. brennan, clapper. leon panetta, hayden, mcglocklin. >> kimberly: let's see if senator rand paul and mccaskill will come forward. >> juan: i think you should get pom-pom's. you could be the cheering squad. lacks coherence because you have military people who have said we oppose gina haspel. why would 100 of our american

military personnel oppose gina haspel when all the insiders, people i know in the intelligence community, people who have been absolutely demonized by the trump administration, now everybody is pro-cia. the insiders love gina haspel, trust or come think she's competent, denser drywall. but when you come down to this issue, it's not about having everybody on the inside say yeah, we like our fellow insider. it's about american values. in terms of american values, someone like john mccain, who was tortured, says i can't do that. dianne feinstein who is definitely a woman indefinitely open to having a woman, first woman run cia says the more i read, the more disturbed i am. >> brian: where was she when this was happening? >> juan: let me just finish up. what you have is a situation where marc short and sarah huckabee sanders had to go to ca because the impression is in a

51-49 republican to democrat senate, right now there are not votes to approve gina haspel. you don't have rand paul. you don't have mccain. >> kimberly: it doesn't mean you won't have them. standby appeared wait-and-see. ric grenell did not have those votes either. >> juan: and how long did it take him? i think gina haspel doesn't want to go through that. the question is whether or not she can say listen, it's in the past. arguably she is the perfect person to say you know what, that was a mistake. i have been through it. let's move on. >> dana: i wouldn't call it a mistake. >> kimberly: she doesn't have to say anything. >> brian: there are people who support her who want her to say what juan said and i think it would be a big mistake. >> kimberly: she should not back down. >> greg: unless she winks. a >> kimberly: not supporting her for other different

ideological -- >> juan: this is about american values. we don't torture people. we don't think that's good. >> kimberly: legal. >> brian: isn't one of your friends that had a choice to jump out of a building or burn alive? if you want to stop the next attack from happening, that's what she had to deal with. she was one of the people that made it work. she should get a medal and the position. >> kimberly: why we are able to sleep peacefully at night. she was making decisions and participating for 33 long years helping keep us all safe. it should be commended. it should not be smeared. >> juan: 9/11 happened so i i don't know if it's where all safe. it's destruction of the tapes also. why senator feinstein missing, the lawyers say go right ahead. if you --

>> dana: eric holder, the attorney general, obama asked him please can you do this review. does the review, declined to prosecute. at what point does the legal system or the justice department, who gets the final word? >> juan: the final word as we are not going to punish people in the prior administration. >> dana: so does she not fall into that category? >> juan: the top job at caa. >> dana: is -- there is no proof. no proof she participated in the enhanced interrogation. >> brian: she was there. because of her, she stopped myriad of attacks. khalid sheikh mohammed.

>> kimberly: she did not personally participate. >> juan: she ran the station. >> greg: the escape hatch in the argument is always, it does not reflect our values. that's an emotional feeling. it's not based on any facts. the facts are our values survive because of our willingness to try and prevent the evil actions of people who want to destroy the world. that reflects our values. to say it's beneath us, please. we did bad things in wars to preserve our freedom. our values are the willingness to protect this country. >> juan: yeah, and we have a large military and we do it but we don't torture people. >> brian: enhanced interrogation. >> juan: it's called torture. >> kimberly: no. you have to follow the law. it was legal, vetted, something that was approved. on the books. she did not commit crimes. she did not engage in any kind of misconduct whatsoever. she followed the law.

will president trump plead the fifth and the russia investigation? his new lawyer isn't ruling it out. that's next. the first survivor of alzheimer's disease

is out there. and the alzheimer's association is going to make it happen. but we won't get there without you. visit alz.org to join the fight. that you don't think about is very much. counties it's really not very important. i was in the stone ages as much as technology wise. and i would say i had nothing. you become a school teacher for one reason, you love kids. and so you don't have the same tools, you don't always believe you have the same... outcomes achievable for yourself. when we got the tablets, it changed everything. by giving them that technology and then marrying it with a curriculum that's designed to have technology at the heart of it, we are really changing the way that students learn.

and i can't wait for ten years from now when i get to talk to them again and see, like, who they are. ♪ so allstate is giving us money back on our bill. well, that seems fair. we didn't use it. wish we got money back on gym memberships. get money back hilarious. with claim-free rewards. switching to allstate is worth it.

oh hi sweetie, i just want to show you something. xfinity mobile: find my phone. [ phone rings ] look at you. this tech stuff is easy. [ whirring sound ] you want a cookie? it's a drone! i know. find your phone easily with the xfinity voice remote. one more way comcast is working to fit into your life, not the other way around.

♪ >> juan: president trump's new attorney rudy giuliani is raising all kinds of questions after his latest media blitz. the former mayor, now saying that the president may not comply with a special counsel subpoena. >> we don't have to. he is the president of the united states. we can assert the same privileges other presidents have. president clinton negotiated a deal when he didn't negotiate the effectiveness -- >> juan: layer giuliani is unsure if the president will plead the fifth. >> are you confident the president will not take the fifth in this case? >> how can i be confident of that? what i -- when i am facing a situation with the president and all the other lawyers are. they think he would be a fool to testify. i have a client who wants to testify. >> juan: mr. trump's attorney not ruling out if michael cohen made payments to other women on

behalf of the president. >> if it was necessary, yes. he made payments for the president or he conducted business for the president which means he had legal fees, monies laid out, and expenditures. which i have on my bills. to my clients. >> juan: is rudy giuliani helping or hurting his client, the president? i will ask you to start us off. >> brian: i think the tone he is setting is exactly what the president wants. he's aggressive. enough sitting on my hands. you want a million pieces of paper? you can have it. i hope you don't call me for a meeting. you're interviewing my friends. you are hassling my family. it's okay. those days are over. what rudy giuliani has to do is inform people about what he's doing. even if he has the best or worst plan, everybody needs to know. the communications department didn't know what he what -- but he was doing and the rest of the team didn't know. i think president trump and

rudy giuliani knew what they were doing. i don't the key was that surprised. i talked to dan for a half-hour on radio, half an hour on "fox & friends," 20 minutes on the phone the day before. there was no panic, know what have i done here. he felt as if he was on path. what he has to do is come back and say we have to speak with one voice. in one way, i think he had set the tone which was positive and in another way, he set them back on the stormy daniels situation. >> juan: dana, i think you were struck by the things that brian just had. folks at the white house were like, we didn't know this was coming. all kinds of shock at this. in addition to which the suggestion there may be more payments came as an absolute unsettling factor. >> dana: there is a school of thought among some people that it's better for the press secretary are people doing communications, for them not to know certain things because it protects them from something. i've never subscribed to that theory but i know it exists. it will turn out however it

turns out. the only thing i am focused on is something that i asked the legal scholar at berkeley. very accomplished lawyer. he knows a lot about the branches of government and how they have to interact. i said what is the settled law of whether a president can ignore a subpoena from the judicial branch. he said it's the one thing that's never been decided by a supreme court. could be the first time it's decided. >> juan: the court said you have to give them the documents. the question is about the testimony. by the way, kimberly, you hear the president say rudy is new to this. he will get his facts straight. well, is rudy on the page or not? >> kimberly: rudy is on the page. that's actually a vote of confidence. they are very close. he relies on his counsel. he's come onto the case quickly. he is catching up, getting a beat on everything.

he's going through it. protect the president, protect the family. he's trying to be forthright and transparent means the questions. not ruling anything out or in. a smart lawyer doesn't close doors. evaluate it. case-by-case determination and bases here. in terms of whether or not the president would have to testify or take the fifth, there are other legal hurdles and challenges. you've had some key rulings that have benefited the president where you've seen the federal judges put a stop to some of the nonsense, saying it's too wide a scope. we want to see the memos. can't just engage in a fishing expedition and try to reel in the president of the united states, his family members, and anyone else who might have communicated with or have knowledge of this. i think there's going to be some legal hurdles. not to mention how many people he might have coming forward with testimony better going to have no credibility whatsoever

in terms of the mueller investigation. i think that's going to be important. who is going to be left to testify who hasn't made inconsistent statements or resign from the fbi or written a book? >> juan: two people left out of this. one, apparently jared is disposable. ivanka is off limits. don't go after ivanka. michael collins has yesterday, michael cohen may be cooperating with mueller. >> greg: i watched a lot of the coverage when i'm at the gym, not by choice. the reason why i hate it so much and most of america hates it, it's lawyers interviewing lawyers about what a lawyer said. what are the legal ramifications of what they said? we are not sure. let's get a panel and talk about it. this story is self fueled hysteria generated by those in the media who feed off it inside their bubble and they don't care that outside the bubble america

really doesn't give a damn. we don't care. they wake up in the morning, tv executive saying should we do stormy or mueller? somebody said something about storming. let's get a panel and to talk about it. let's get the legal panel to parse the words. then we get the next panel for the political ramifications. while this is all going on, someone else will start the process over again by saying something about mueller so that you can switch from stormy to mueller. meanwhile trump's numbers continue to go up. america gets incredibly fed up and burned out by this and i'm telling you there's going to be a rebound to this that's going to help trump because people are tired of hearing about lawyers and experts talk about subpoenas and summarizing facts that we don't give a flying crap about. >> brian: those judges who made those comments, they came on said you don't want paul

manafort. you want trump. the other one says you had an indictment. one you produce the evidence for the indictment? i'm not giving you any more time. the ig report is going to be very revealing. >> greg: i still don't care. sorry. >> juan: we've got to go. we have to sell some ads. former first lady michelle obama not happy president trump's in the white house and now she is creating some waves by questioning a large chunk of his voters. that's next on "the five" ." people said it just made a mess until exxonmobil scientists put it to the test. they thought someday it could become fuel and power our cars wouldn't that be cool? and that's why exxonmobil scientists think it's not small at all. energy lives here. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms

including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase. the best simple salad ever?d great tasting, heart-healthy california walnuts. so simple, so good. get the recipes at walnuts.org.

do ndo not misjudgenity quiet tranquility. with the power of 335 turbo-charged horses the lincoln mkx, more horsepower than the lexus rx350 and a quiet interior from which to admire them. the lincoln spring sales event is here. for a limited time get 0% apr on the lincoln mkx. plus get $1000 bonus cash. >> greg: in the latest installment of what happened in an election that occurred a year and a half ago, michelle obama was asked how trump won, and she lay the blame on hillary. just kidding. she blamed sexism from women against women. >> in light of this last election, i am concerned about us as women and how we think. if we are not comfortable with the notion that a woman could be

our president compared to what? you know, we have to have that conversation with ourselves as women. >> greg: maybe so, but her analysis seems a symptom of a greater problem that contributed to her party's loss. goes back to seeing the group another person. i call it identity politics blindness. they lost not just hillary was a woman, they lost because all they saw was a woman. meanwhile trump took nothing for granted. as many voters would have happily voted for a woman, just not that one because unlike trump, she didn't speak to their concerns. she only spoke of her entitlement. she just assumed that she had the votes. just assuming a woman must vote for a woman seems pretty insulting from a man. humans are more complex, surprising, and interesting than liberals give them credit for. more than anything, trump's election is a lesson in effort. he showed up, he fought. hillary didn't. if democrats learn from that, they can win.

if they continue to dwell in this narrow minded and tolerant universe where people sit in their own identity buckets and their behavior is fixed forever by or race, they will lose. and then what group will they blame next? what do you think, kimberly? do you think michelle obama would feel differently if she were a left-wing woman? it's not really about gender. >> kimberly: i don't think it's about gender. you hit the nail on the head when he said it's about the candidate. making choices based on the qualification, the merit of the candidacy. what you saw during this past election, the working men and women across the country felt this was movement they wanted to be part of. blue-collar workers, families, not be left behind. if a fantastic female candidate who went out there to campaign and hit all the spots you are supposed to and spoke to the people in that way, i 100% believe they could prevail. perhaps someday michelle obama would run for office.

i think she would do quite well. i think oprah winfrey would do quite well. it's a measure of what you have to offer, what's going on in the country, how you speak to the issues. hillary has given us quite a few excuses as to why she did not prevail in the campaign, and one of the latest that we discussed on the show was who she said she felt the people thought she was a capitalist. they didn't relate to her. perhaps that's the case. she did not make the case to the everyday man and woman effectively or persuasively, and that's -- enough to get them to choose her. >> greg: dana, france. as a woman, not as a human being, but as a woman. >> dana: let me out of my bucket. there is an interesting debate about demographics going on right now on twitter but basically saying that for a long time, demographers have been saying that country is changing and the democrats are going to run away with it if the republicans don't figure it out. it's been going on for 26 years and it hasn't happened. maybe it will happen in the

future but at the same time, the sand is shifting the need the democrats' feet. there's a new coalition built in 2016, and i don't see what the democrats are doing to try to win back the blue-collar workers. we have a segment coming up talking about economics which is something that's quite remarkable with the left is coming up with when it comes to talking about capitalism or not. the thing is i would say the republicans are probably not doing enough yet to figure out how to keep the coalition in their corner. >> greg: juan, we get into this. i say humans are more complex and interesting than identity politics would imply and you say but we do the same thing, or the republicans do the same thing. >> juan: we are in an era of white identity politics as represented by president trump like we've never seen. but i want to come to the point, i think what michelle obama said really appeals to the basis of your argument. she said this was about credentials. that clearly we had the better

credentialed, experience in terms of preparing to be president. and look what you objected. someone who has no experience, who is chaotic and impulsive and all the rest. remember you have 52% of white women who voted for trump. she is saying why is that? previously, mrs. obama has said you can't wait for the next person to save you. you've got to do it yourself. women who are voting against women because they are woman or don't trust a woman, there is something negative in there. >> brian: you are making it too complex. president obama left very popular but his policies weren't paid for eight years, the more frustrated. people were unmotivated. all he did was gradually lose the entire party and not fund the dnc and build himself up. people didn't like his administration, didn't like the way it was executed. if you have someone who is a veteran, understands people, has

a lot to offer, it would be different. she did not lose because she was a woman. she didn't get the votes because she was a woman. in the end, it was two candidates and they took the person who they thought would be most dramatically different from president obama and they got it. >> kimberly: it's a good head-to-head. >> brian: that's the future. can we save this show? >> greg: know, annie show you are on, we burn it. >> juan: >> greg: gun owners in illinois are stealing a page from the playbook. ♪

this is a story about mail and packages. and it's also a story about people. people who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams they're handing us more than mail they're handing us their business and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country,

we never forget... that your business is our business the united states postal service. priority: you ♪ same thing with any dent or dings on this truck. they all got a story about what happened to 'em. man 2: it was raining, there was only one way out. i could feel the barb wire was just digging into the paint. man: two bulls were fighting, (thud) bam hit the truck. try explaining that to your insurance company. woman: another ding, another scratch. it'll just be another chapter in the story.

every scar tells a story, and you can tell a lot more stories when your truck is a chevy silverado. the most dependable, longest-lasting, full-size pickups on the road.

♪ >> dana: five illinois counties are flipping the script on the left, declaring thinks restarts for gun overs if the state moves to pass restrictive gun control laws. here is the state attorney in

one of those counties. >> there was a thought, why don't we make this a sanctuary county like they would for undocumented immigrants? we did flip the script and i think it's what's caused this outpouring of support and also against what we are up to. >> dana: greg, this was your idea. >> greg: i said. what is good for the goose is good for the gun owner. if you decide to exempt a group of people from loss, why can't anybody do it? why are you special? if you said i want a sanctuary city for unborn children, at the same time, a gun owner sanctuary where you could block people from going to abortion clinics. armed people could do that. that's what you're talking about. once you make it okay for one group to do it, it could be civil war. that's why you have lost. >> dana: kimberly, what happens with the law?

>> kimberly: the whole situation i think is tough because you have people on both sides of this i can be very polarizing because you want to be sympathetic but at the same time you have to uphold the rule of law. doesn't it make sense? we can't decide to legislate based on popular emotions or sentiments of the time. that's not how a lawful society works. it's just not to. you have people with very strong opinions, very heartfelt. they want to be heard. let's let them be heard. but you have to change the laws on the books. you can't just choose to ignore them. >> dana: right. juan, what do you think about the strategy of flipping the script on the left when it comes to sanctuary? >> juan: [laughs] it's great. it's cute. like saying we can do it. if you do it, we'll do it. to mean, the sanctuary idea comes from the catholic church. the catholic church that come in, to the illegal immigrants, and we will protect families. i can't imagine they are going to say if you want freedom to carry, conceal and carry.

come on in. they don't feel that way. >> dana: but the concept is the same. the principle is the same. >> brian: we didn't elect the pope. i did not see him on the ballot but i will say i am outraged by this. i did think this was a slippery slope although no one was asking me at the time because i wasn't on "the five" that day. but i do think it's a bad sign. 11 states has basically let's vote on getting out of the union. one state says let's open up our borders, let everybody in. the other state goes, the other part of illinois says i need a gun. i don't want to ban bump stocks. it's not up to you. you have to elect people to represent you. you can't go wildcat on loss. we have to stop it. if it has to stop on "the five," let's stop it right here. >> greg: in new jersey, there is a kilmeade free zone.

>> dana: it can go the other way. i read the article about several sheriffs across the country ignoring local and state laws and saying they only are responsible to enact the constitution. so we will find out. will republicans benefit out from the democrats hard left tun and head the midterm? amanda's mom's appointment just got rescheduled - for today. amanda needs right at home. our customized care plans provide as much - or as little help - as her mom requires. whether it's a ride to the doctor or help around the house. oh, of course! tom, i am really sorry. i've gotta go. look, call right at home. get the right care. right at home.

prepare for your demise, do your worst, doctor. i will. but first, a little presentation. hijacking earth's geothermal energy supply. phase 1. choosing the right drill bit. as long as evil villains reveal their plans, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. i am totally blind. and non-24 can make me show up too early... or too late. or make me feel like i'm not really "there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424. let someone else do the heavy lifting. tripadvisor compares prices from over 200 booking sites to find the right hotel for you at the lowest price. so you barely have to lift a finger. or a wing. tripadvisor.

>> brian: socialist bernie sanders pushing the party to take a hard left turn for a change. he wants health care for all come education for all. he also wants jobs for all at $15 an hour. bernie wants the government to guarantee a job for every american willing and able to work. it sounds good but will it be a disaster for the free market and free economy? is going to be outlining it in a big speech in maryland today. dana, $15 an hour. we have 3.9% unemployment but he says everyone should get it. he provides no evidence of how this is going to be funded. >> dana: it's interesting when you have the head coach of capitalism, president trump, who is saying look at what i have done here. see the results. then you have someone like bernie sanders who still has a

very strong following. coming forward with all of these programs that are not free market oriented that would put, slam the brakes on the growing economy. they never have to talk about how they would funded. they just say it will work out. >> brian: from the federal government, administered locally. they are going to clean up vacant lots. they're going to oversee programs for new mothers, treeplanting, and whether rising homes. it turns out there might even be ads for these. right now, that need to be filled. they can't fill, fulfilled our staff to work in restaurants but bernie sanders is going to fund these jobs. >> juan: i don't know how he's going to fund them but the fact is you go back and look at something like the new deal, we created jobs. >> brian: there was 20% unemployment then. >> juan: we created jobs as the government. then we had a war. military jobs. if you wanted to go that far. but the difference here is how many people -- >> brian: you can't like this.

>> juan: i don't know to like it or dislike it but i think the objection would be how much will it cost and the potential for inflation and everyone has medicare. we don't know. if you offer them a job for 15 bucks, they wouldn't take it, a lot of people. >> brian: bernie sanders is in the wrong country. he has to leave. we don't have to change. >> greg: my name is greg. >> brian: thank you. then i will go to kimberly. >> juan: you can't disk my man man. -- dis my man. you are going to hurt his feelings. >> brian: he has no feelings. >> greg: wait until "one more thing." >> kimberly: i have an answer for you. he is an avowed socialist, communist. he wants to make sure and guarantee these conservatives . it's beautiful and lofty. how are we going to pay for it?

there is no free market, no capitalism involved in this whatsoever. based on our constitution, based on our system of governance, based on capitalism and free markets in this country. it's unworkable. if you want to take a look at venezuela and you think that is winning, go ahead. >> juan: hillary clinton said so many of these bernie populists didn't like the fact she was a capitalist. >> brian: wants to give free community college, larry hogan. this is right on the maryland platform. >> greg: all of these exist because they are half a plan. you have free health care, free education. but they don't come up with the second part of it except to take money from somebody else. if you want an example with minimum wage. when you raise it to $15, that's the bottom rung which means

inflation, prices go up, and the job market shrinks because you can have as many jobs. that heightens the unemployment for white teenagers, black teenagers, all teenagers. you have to read thomas soul's book. looks at the effects of minimum wage. before minimum wage, there was almost near full employment for teenagers. once minimum wage was introduced, it destroyed. >> brian: because it's a free market. >> dana: governor hogan of maryland, there's a defensible explanation for that, free college tuition. it's a cost benefit and the long run because you have to get people hopefully able to graduate high school with a little bit of skills they can get good jobs. >> brian: dana, there is not one person out there that wants to go click to community college they can't afford it. there are so many programs. "one more thing" is coming up next. (vo) dogs have evolved,

but their nutritional needs remain instinctual. that's why there's purina one true instinct. real meat #1. a different breed of natural nutrition. purina one true instinct. now, try new purina one true instinct treats.

let's do an ad of a man eating free waffles at comfort inn. they taste like victory because

he always gets the lowest price on our rooms, guaranteed, when he books direct at choicehotels.com. or just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com the full value of your new car? you're better off throwing your money right into the harbor. i'm gonna regret that. with new car replacement, if your brand new car gets totaled, liberty mutual will pay the entire value plus depreciation. liberty stands with you. liberty mutual insurance. >> i time now for one more thin. >> join me in celebrating world war ii 96-year-old veteran. he got his associates degree from use of toledo. had came 68 years after he took his last class. he did have enough credits in order to graduate. he got to get the cap on and

he got to get the cap on and he said i will be proud to hang that diploma on the wall. very good advice. >> thank you for that. very good one. >> something very important. can we roll this please? brian kil killmeade news. it's his birthday. >> i got you a few gifts. >> we have new books. you can order that. i got the bible unspeakable truths. you'll like in one as well. how to be right. this is the book that came out two years ago. "how to be right." not cool. one of my personal favorites. there you go. >> happy birthday brian.

>> i'm assuming you can read. >> greg was going to get you cake. we hate eating on air. >> thank you very much. >> this is sister -- first lady melania trump unveiled new platform of initiative to help children. it will address the well being of children. positivity on social media and fighting opioid abuse. here she is discussing why she has been so fiercely committed to tackling these issues. >> i feel strongly as adults we should be educating our children about the importance of a healthy and balanced life. so today, i'm very excited to announce the best an awareness

campaign dedicated to the most valuable and fragile among us. our children. >> this is something the first lady has been passionate prior to becoming first lady. i commend her for her choices. >> talk about too much winning. a texas woman yet unnamed $1.2 million on saturday. here's her picture. she platessed bet at a racetrack in salem, texas. see bet $18 on a pick five and included the derby winner justify who was favorite. he bet long shot winner. the woman won just about as much as the owners of the horse who won the kentucky derby >> it's always about race with you. >> go brian. >> i'll try anyway. there's going to be a rambo five. maybe wonder if there's a hockky

three. would hulk hogan beat sylvester stallone today? the problem is, tmz had the sound. >> brian happy birthday, after book for up. happy birthday. the wait is over. president trump says he will announce his decision on the iran nuclear deal tomorrow. the president blast former secretary of state john kerry for trying to save the iran agreement. where are the votes on the president's pick to run the cia? this is "special report." good evening welcome to washington i'm bret baier. we are just hours away from learning whether the u.s. will stay in the iran nuclear clear that was the main foreign policy legacy of