>> sean: wow. a joyful day in the life of joy behar. usually megan mccain who is doing a good job. that's all the time we have left. we are not the destroy trump media there she is. laura. >> laura: i think the earth is opening up, like the sky is going to fall in. you said something nice about joy. this could be the beginning, you have kim jong un, and trump, june 12. you enjoy touring the country. i would buy tickets to that. >> sean: the last time i was on that show. >> laura: they love you there. >> sean: i love woopy goldberg.r i think megan mccain is doing a good job. it was a screaming match and barbarara walters couldn't stop it. i don't need the headache.

four hours is enough. >> laura: hugh jackman was on before me. >> sean: your ratings have been phenomenal, congratulations. and all your wins, you have been a great addition to our lineup. >> laura: thank you so much. good evening from washington, i'm laura ingraham. president trump basks in the glow with his latest triumph at a make america great again. >> president trump: remember people saying he's going to get us into a nuclear war. you know what gets you into other wars? weakness. >> laura: plus, there's evidence that may prove collusion between mueller and comey? we are going to share the details.

cnn's favorite porn star lawyer denies democrats are paying their fees. why are a group in such a hurry to get amnesty for the dreamers. we'll tell you him first, a tale of two confirmations are cia director, john brennan and gina haspel. that's the focus of tonight's angle. let's takee a trip back to 2013 when democrats actually supported what they now oppose. on march 7 of that year the senate confirmed obama cia director nominee, john brennan. he was previously director ofev the national counter terrific centerm and a supporter of enhanced interrogation. 13 republicans voted to confirm brennan including lindsey graham

and john mccain. now, the issue of brennan's involvement in enhanced interrogation didn't concern the democrats on the senate intel committee back then. of the 50 democrats who voted to confirm brennan in 2013, 36 are still in office. during brennan's confirmation hearing in 2013, weaponnize drones were the big issue. this is how the question of water boarding was addressed. >> what steps did you take to stop cia from moving to these techniques? >> i did not take steps. i was not in the chain of command of that program. i expressed my objections and views about certain of those where i professed my personal objections to it. i did not try to stop it because

it was something that was being done in a different part of the agency under the authority of others and it was something that was directed by the administration at the time. >> laura: and that was that.ha move on. well, it wasn't until decembernt of 2014 when the senate intel committee released a report criticizing enhanced interrogation describing thetu techniques as torture, that anyone began to care that much about it. during a press conference, brennan reversed course, defended the program and refused to label techniques like water boarding torture. even the media seemeds sympathetic. andrea mitchell lobbed this at the cia director. >> do you think the bin ladenbu case can be acontributed in some part to enhanced interrogation techniques or torture? >> the detainees who were

subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques provided information that was useful and used in the ultimate operation to go against bin laden. >> laura: well, not only did he go on the record defending the bush administration's tactics, he also reportedly objected to the obama administration's decision to release the bush interrogation memos. apparently he did think the program had value what it led to the elimination of bin laden, who knows. brennan was the cia's deputy executive director when the techniques were being used. and he still was confirmed as cia director by democrats. brennan was also on the superior to ginals haspel, now president trump's nominee to become cia director. >> were you involved in any way in the creation of the enhanced

interrogation program? >> senator, i was not. and i was not read into the program until about a year into its existence. >> laura: guess who learned about the enhanced interrogation at about the same time as gina haspel? congress. yes. fast forward to today. suddenly nancy pelosi and her fellow democrats pretend they hold the world high ground against torture? where were their objections when they were being briefed on these techniques? instead,ni democrats and republicans like mccain and paulan are using the haspel's involvement in the program to try to block her confirmation as cia director. boy, what a difference four years makes. >> mr. brennan is without a doubtt qualified for this position. people who have worked closely

with him regularly cite his work ethic, determination. john brennan will be a strong leader. while many nominees have classified backgrounds, you are unique. were you an advocate for destroying the tapes? did you oversee the enhanced interrogation of al nashiri which included the use of the water board as reported? >> laura: what was to that first one? why do the democrats who supported brennan now oppose gina haspel? what's changed. very confusing. i will tell you what's changed, donald trump is now president. and the democrats, he must be stopped at all cost. and he must be denied the personnel to help him advance his agenda. you see, it's not a tale of two confirmations.

it's a tale of the two faces of the democratic party. one face says it supports a robust national security and the other will do whatever it takeso to stop trump and then regain power. and that's the angle.le joining us for reaction from boston is jeff beatty, a retired officer who worked as a counter terror official. in idaho, mike baker is with us. and with me here in washington is rosa brooks, a former obama official and current senior fellow at the new america foundation. great to see you. mike, i believe you trained with gina, correct? you can give us a little insigha into her and her experience. we demonstrated how they supported brennan, now gina haspel is a problem.

but gina haspel, her work experience, who she is as a person, you know this well. >> we were in training at the same time at the beginning of our respective careers. she has excelled where mine was somewhat mediocre. what you should do is put this on a continuous loop. it's absolutely correct. the idea that somehow they were able to now draw a sharp dividew between the confirmation process for john brennan, who i have a lot of respect for, unless they have some different standard for a male director designation and female director designate, how do you explain this other than, as you pointed out, the difference is trump. i found most interesting of the open questions that were asked yesterday and the open session of the hearing, these questions about how did you feel about it?

what did you think about it? what really counts when you are talking about the intel community and military and law enforcement, what are the laws on the books at that time. how somebody feels about it, frankly, i don't care. i don't think the american public cares what the feels are. if you can imagine if your operation people go out and pacecally are making their decisions based on how they might feel about t. >> laura: rosa, i want to go to you. even people who are critical of this president, phil is a cia analyst on cnn and he was asked about the values question. did t you think this is moral wt was being done? she stayed on the morality question. >> do you believe that the previous interrogation techniques were immoral? >>ra she spoke about american values and rule of law.

she can vote however she wants. i don't appreciate the collective amnesia. >> laura: obviously referring to the democrats, who voted for john brennan. > laura, i think you are highlighting that these are bipartisan vices. i think she didn't answer a straight question. she dodged that one completely. you are right. the obama administration soft-pedaled this issue, we are now seeing scrutiny of gina haspel. the irony here is that democrats like the fact that gina haspel is a professional, she is wants to advance the america agenda. democrats like that a lot more. but the downside is that if you want that, you got to embrace

somebody who seems to have embraced torture. >> laura: she didn't design the program. >> i have to pose the challenge flag. >> laura: jeff is coming in on this. >> i got to throw the challenge flag there, rosa. torture is a propaganda word. that is a propaganda word and it's chosen to evoke an emotional response. it's chosen to conjure up images of people on the rack or cutting off fingers or limbs. >> it's also international laws. >> you train your people too use propaganda terms, i don't allow my students to use loaded language like that. it's not the rack, it's not cutting people's fingers off or limbs off. it is water boarding. you want to talk about water boarding, let's talk about it. let's not go from the specific

to the general and the general is a lot more heinous. >> laura: i think what rosa is saying there is a convention against torture. however, we shifted our understanding of what that means. and after 9/11 we wanted the information. your former experience, we wanted the information to stop these attacks. if any one of us had a kid being kidnapped and one person knew where a child was, do whatever you have to do to get that information. we knowio that. >> yes, you would. it's like having a pet dog and you train the dog to bring the paper to you and the dog does what you t want it to do, follos your instructions. now years later you beat the dog with the paper. it's like is it legal, was it legal? it was and she did. legal procedure. it was investigated twice and found to be legal.

>> laura: she's eminently qualified to be cia director by any fair indication or examination ofin her background. what she feels as a person is frankly not relevant to her job as a person in charge of the thailand black site. her feelings, that's such a democratic lib way, your feelings. rosa has to get back in. >> this is not my propaganda word. there's a real irony, funny how we talk about the world war ii generation as the greatest generation. when we faced the threat, we prosecuted japanese soldiers for water boarding u.s. soldiers and we called it torture then, the same we have called it torturew consistently. there was a brieft. period in te bush administration with some of dicdick cheney's lawyers wantedo

change it. >> laura: cheney still says we should be doing water boarding. >> i can't believe a term that was applicable at the time. >> laura: you got to speak at one time. let's get to mike first. >> thank you. i can'tmi believe that we are going through this and relitigating again with somebody who is qualified for thisn position as gina haspel is. what they did so well all those years ago, this was the front w burner topic, the far left, they seized the moral high ground and said everything except talking to a detainee is torture. everything. now, i understand, it's ad, subject, but frankly, that's nob the case. there are areas, like everything else, not this or that. there are areas, they referred to it as enhanced interrogation

techniques. the department of justice,, office of legal counsel, weighed in on this repeatedly andnd clearly. and now the information passedse to the general counsel. there is a worn path, a well-worn path between langley, where the cia headquarters is and capitol hill in 2002, 2003, going up and talking to -- >> laura: i made that point. nancy pelosi learned about it the same time gina did. jeff. >> it's it' important to recogne another aspect of what you brought out in the angle. talking about this is more about donald trump than gina haspel. even to the republicans involved in this, salute to senator mccain, he encouraged me back in the day to run for senate, which i did. maybe i should be mad at him for

that. but i have the highest respect for him. i think he's letting his annamous bleed over. f he has a strong dislike for president trump. i'm afraid he's so respected, out of respect to him other republican senators may accede to his wish, that this nominee of president trump not get confirmed. i think it's a mistake, i hope he will change his mind about it and i hope his colleagues will recognize. she's professional. you got a great group of people, you want somebody how to best use them. we heard today she's going to respect the law. >> laura: we could have an hour conversation about this and so many other intel topics. we appreciate it. after all this time, we may have evidence of collusion between

trump and the russians? no. between mueller and comey. we'll explain in moments. stay there. 100% clear skin wi. up to 90% of those with moderate to severe psoriasis had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. most people were still clearer after one year. with taltz, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. ready for a chance at 100% clear skin? ask your doctor about taltz.

oh hi sweetie, i just want to show you something. xfinity mobile: find my phone. [ phone rings ]

look at you. this tech stuff is easy. [ whirring sound ] you want a cookie? it's a drone! i know. find your phone easily with the xfinity voice remote. one more way comcast is working to fit into your life, not the other way around. >> laura: we say this a lot, but documents obtained by judicial watch may confirm collusion. between mueller and comey. in the e-mails, fbi officials advise james comey to consult with mueller before comey testified tons congress. what? that substancates he met in june of last year. joining us with more is tom fitten. we are joined by saul wisenberg

alongg with rc dylann. great to see all of you. tom, boy, it's tough to get documents out of this justice department. you had to file how many suits to get this nugget about comey and muler? >> two freedom of information lawsuits. we began august of last year and we got 15 or so pages in the last couple of weeks. james comey was fired, he's communicating with the fbi. you see the e-mails, dear jim, hi, jim, can we coordinate. what information do you need. me to have. >> laura: we have a couple off the full screens of the e-mails up there. yeah, director, in response, we have consulted with executive management including general counsel and recommend the

following, that your counsel -- it is a mistake. consult with special counsel mueller to determine the timingy the timing should be worked out with mueller. >> that's right. >> laura: is there any benign explanation for this? >> typically there would be some coordination. what comey said was beyond the pale. certainly, if you are an fbi director an you are having meetings with the president of the united states, the agencies tell you, you are not allowed to talk about it. you are not allowed to talk about the documents you created. comey had free reign and it wasa blessed by the fbi, it looks like, and by mr. mueller. >>by saul, this is curious. they are also, as they refer to in this e-mail, there are

institutional prerogatives that may be presented by any such testimony. so the fbi, messaging comey, we wantof to coordinate about the concerns. i don't know, the institutional privileges, the things comey wouldn't have to reveal presumably on capitol hill. do you see any problems of this, the appearance of coordination? >> i don't see any problem for mueller. to me, this isn't new news. i think comey at the time announced he was going to consult with mueller. it's clear that comey had a man crush on mueller and wants to wrap himself in mueller's glory. i haven't read these latest e-mails that tom got. i don't think there is anything wrong with comey going to mueller and saying i'm going to testify, do you have any problem with what i'm going to say or how i'm going to say it. do we know that mueller blessed

anything? or somebody's surmise. nothing surprises me about jim. comey. i don't think it should be used to smear mueller. >> laura: here's another big story. so deven nunes and trey went to the justice department. they said we had a productive discussion with department of justice, fbi, we raised questions related to the information requested from the intel community. the officials committed to holding further discussions of these matters. we look forward to continuing dialogue. thisbl follows nunes threatening contempt of congress. where is this going? >> this is bad for the reputation of the department of justice and fbi. it takes repeated threats. like those movies where the villains are chasing the train

and throwing stuff off the back to delay them. but eventually they have to pay the piper and come forward with this information. they are doing it slowly. there is something they have to hide. if they didn't have something to hide, what's ironic is that the department of justice is not in the constitution. it's an inferior branch of government created by congress. for them to say they are above congress iss outrageous. the president wants them to cooperate. they put out the story that the white house is on board with what they are doing. t but then the white house put out a statement, we want you to cooperate. what we have seen from redactions in the past is that they were nothing. they were there to protect the doj. >> laura: they were exculpatory, snonot for the doj.

>> they were trying to hide something. >> laura: there is always a war between congress and the executive branch. but this does take it to a new level. kim has an interesting analysis. tonight in the wall street journal, she says it's about the fbibo source. we know mr. nunes' request deals with a top secret intel source of the fbi and cia who is a u.s. citizen and involved in the russia collusion probe. we might say the cia had a person on the payroll who used his or her credentials to interact with the trump campaign. she has incredible sources, i know that. she seems to be indicating there could haveom been someone inside the trump campaign from the fbi spying on the trump campaign.hi

we'll see if any of this pans out. >> we had information that there was a counter intelligence committee. >> laura: how does that play out, wire taps? >> what did the program entail. this justice takes the approach of the modified limited hangout. for four months they sat on the fact that they had the pages an- we found out about the clinton dac dossier. >> laura: other shoes will drop. >> i don't believe there is that information. >> laura: if, saul, i know you love if's as a white collar litigator, let's go back to law school. if the fbi embedded someone inside the trump campaign and

they believe for legitimate purpose if russia was trying to throw the election, they put someone inside the trump campaign, we are working in one of those little cubicles with his or her ear out, what is the problem there? >> there is a big problem unless you have the same kind of problem whenn you search a lawyer's office. you better have something really good. there is an old saying, before i go any further, give credit to john you are lichtman. i wouldn't want to leave him twisting slowly in the wind. the wages of crying wolf. so for me, put her finger on it. we have seen too many instances where they said we have to redact this because it could

endanger national security. we have seen times when it'sg. unredacted and it's embarrassing. people are going to stop believing you and we lose all credit wilt. >> we saw last weekend where they redacted the select committee report. and they revealed two incredible things. one, that the fbi think that mike had lied. we heard about that. >> huge. >>ho shockingly, that the underlying crime mike flynn was being investigate would for is the logan act. it's been a dead letter for over 200 years. it's really shocking that sally yates would approve and green

light investigation of anybody for violating the logan act. >> laura: we are way over here. but sally yates, that little hissy fit of a resignation letter.er that whole thing smells like a big fat setup to me. yates marching -- don't have any business going to that interview. of course, they didn't give him notice. mike flynn shouldn't have did anything. i want to do an hour. i need a five hour show. i love my guests. another claim by stormy daniels' attorney.e we'll address the question of who is bank rolling avonati. polident's 4 in 1 cleaning system consists of 4 powerful ingredients that work together to deep clean your denture in hard to reach places.

it kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and it helps to remove stains. polident should be the first choice of every person that wears a denture, to clean their denture.

>> laura: avenatti is on other networks, and he's often treated more like an investigative

journalist or impartial analyst than the lawyer representing a porn star who is accusing the president, et cetera, et cetera. but an op ed raises a serious question. who is paying michael avenatti? mike penn noted it took a long time to find out that the clinton campaign paid for the fusion gps dossier, a fact that was only disclosed after the damage was done. avenatti shot back in a tweet that insisted they all come from donations or clients. but penn cited a tweet admitting that she's not paying her lawyer. let's look into this with ari fleisher. let's start with you, ari. avenatti is pretty much a co-host of various other shows all day long.

i don't know how he does any legal research or memos or work. he's always on television. he says that's the way he gets tips and he gets info because people see him and then they him. we have legal issues because he received this banking information from michael cohn. on this issue of payment and who pays him, do you boy he's crowd funding his fees? i know what lawyers cost and they are experiencive. >> i think it is possible. he'sss also looking at this as a big pay day. he's getting this publicity. when he says he's not paid by big, rich people, that's what he says. either he's lying or telling the truth. i don't think he has reason toul lie about who is paying him. what bothers me is that he comes across as a political operative.

his client already received $130,000, she spilled the beans. i don't legally understand what other issues she has that he represents her for. he just seems to have a vendetta for president trump and comes across more as a political operative, just like he was a contributor on the other networks. >> laura: i want to play something for you from march 25 when he was on 60 minutes. let's watch. >> in college, in law school, you did opposition research for a democratic operative. some people would say you are politically motivated. >> i haven't done anything in politics in 20 years. >> but it sound political. >> no, it sound righteous?

>> how so? >> my client is credible. >> she didn't have an affair, broke her agreement and asked for $130,000 from cohn. here's what his political donations were. bash bra boxer, gave a thousand, john kerry for president, 2,000. 1250 to again hart. $6,000 in contributions. they went back to 2007. he got the 20 years wrong. is there any doubt in your mind that thiss is a democrat lawyer who is advising a client to break an mdm and seek fame and glory against donald j. trump. >> who cares. i'm more interested in who is paying michael cohn. iey wish you would same that spd

time on donald trump, on his dealings. >> laura: i don't like the swamp whether it's in new york or washington at all. i didn't like it when john and the padestas cashed in on their connections with the clintons. if someone cashing in is going to throw people in jail just for wanting to cash in on it, you are going to have jails full all over washington and new york. that happens all the time. if there is a quid pro quo for propsed action, someone could be in trouble here. what we are hearing from the counsel representing the president is president didn't know who his client were, who he was representing and at&t basicallyer used him and said hs not getting anything out of it. >> this is about a lawyer. this is about a president who struggles mere and more. >> laura: why is he getting more

popular? >> it's about financial records. health record, whether it's about having an extra marital affair. this is what this is about a president that cannot tell the truth. >> laura: why are his numbers going up? >> i'm sure the president is goings to see numbers go up and down. >> laura: why have they been going up? the more the other cable channels are obsessed with stormy, 24/7. the north korea story is an after thought. why do 57% of americans say we are going in a positive direction now, cnn poll? >> why do they want to know more what happened with the bob mueller investigation? >> laura: the president is responding to the will of the people,e peace and prosperity. there areim always people claimg this happened, a porn star, did

michael cohn throw the election. ari fleisher, look, avenatti, we have seen this type running around for decades. there is always someone an operative or lawyer who is going to make a lot of money and get a lot of fame out of trashing written ton otrashingclinton or. your thought gnaw that he has a saars banking record, he actually hadta copies of those. is there any possible problem of his receiving those copies? >> well, certainly there can be. if he was the recipient of something illegally derived. he's an officer of the court, that was obtained against the law, that is private financial

information that michael cohn is entitled to. private citizens should not be able to get that. the other issue he has, the kit glove treatment he's given, when nbc came out with that false report that said michael cohn is wire taps, they had to walk it back. then he did interviews after the walk back. t nobody challenged him on it. you said yesterday it was a fact. why did you say that? it's easy to be a trump critic because you can go on those shows and they are so anti-trump. >> the 0% of the coverage isiv negative. when he was asked earlier tonight, whether they made a mistake with michael cohns, he said we didn't get confused. he had another michael cohn listed on the payment and it

wasn't the michael cone of new york. >> had know idea he was going to be there. is he going against trump? >> joel, you can talk over me, but it doesn't change the facts. the president of the united states, his approval numbers, which you guys hang your hat on when they are down, are going up as the media are obsessed by a couple of topics, mueller and daniels. that's what they go with morning, noon and night. p the american people are tuning it out.bs we should talk about north korea, ari, they see through someone like avenatti. he already said he wants a cable show. he will entertain offers to get his own cable show. some republicans are trying to pull an end run around the president's plan to secure the border. we'll get the inside scoop from

dave brat, next. i'm alex trebek, here to tell you

about the colonial penn program.

if you're age 50 to 85, and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget, remember the three p's. -the three p's? -what are the three p's? the three p's of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can't increase, and a price that fits your budget. i'm 65 and take medications. what's my price? you can get coverage for $9.95 a month. i just turned 80. what's my price? $9.95 a month for you too. call now about the #1 most popular whole life insurance plan, available through the colonial penn program. no medical exam, no health questions. your acceptance is guaranteed. so call now for free information.

>> laura: a few more liberal republicans are pushing a bill through the house to legalize daca. paul ryan says he wants a bill the president can sign. the bill is at odds with conservatives. let's discuss, this is like a three-card monte going on. dave, this is wild. because people were talking about this, this moderate, liberal republican push for a daca bill and saying that's the pathway to the good lap bill. it's a nightmare. >> there's this complicated technical thing, queen of the hill. it won't pass. what does pass? the dreamer bill. the dreamer's 3.6 million

dreamers, 10 million j illegals. pathway to citizenship. that's what's in play. speaker ryan said we'll pass the good lap bill. members of the committee said it hasn't passed out of committee. if they want to whip it, they can get it passed. >> laura: what everyone t watchg need to know is that paul ryan, we like paul ryan, but he's on his way out, has not moved this bill in the committee. the committee has to move it out to consider a vote on the floor. the nat is not going to approve it. you could use i i it for the midterms. can i play something for you? the president was in indiana, this made me smile. let's watch. >> president trump: joe donnelly voted against enhanced vetting. think of that. what in the world would anybody be doing voting against enhanced

vetting? why? >> that's exactly right. >> laura: for people come into thee country. who they are, why they are here, the refugees. >> and it does everything we want. solves the border, builds the wall. senator obama was for all of that in '05. >> laura: oh, yeah, he was a border hawk. >> it's a compromise. 700,000 daca's, get them out of the shadows. s we said okay, we'll compromise with you. trump offers 2 million, democrats say no. now we have got 25 republicans doing an end run with 200 democrats. if the people at home missed the main t point, it's 25 republicas leapfrogging over leadership. >> laura: all they knowy is 25, we can a go with the democrats,

and daca is the law of the land. so that's the problem. everybody watching understand, we need the good lap bill. it's a trick pony,. >> it's a trojan horse. >> laura: from every equine reference here. are we kantering toward -- he's gone. that's bad. always good to have you on. next, we'll take you on a tour beyond the headlines and tell you about the story about a controversial ice raid. don't go away. melatonin is the body's own sleep ingredient. only remfresh uses ion-powered melatonin to deliver up to 7 hours of sleep support. number one sleep doctor recommended remfresh-your nightly sleep companion. available in the natural sleep section at walmart.

>> laura: now let's take you on a little journalism field trip. sometimes the real story isn't in the headlines. the lead is buried to hide the

real story. for instance, look at this headline from tuesday's san diego union tribune, caught on video, father arrested by ice officers. until you read further down, then you discover that 31 alberto was convicted for beating his wife in 2007. according to ice, he's illegally reentered the country 16 times since 2003. notun until we get several paragraphs deeper do we get theo real story from ice. when officers tried to arrest him, he fled back into his house and hid upstairs with his family. off thers gooffofficers got an . cornell university student presentstu thesis in bra,

underwear to protest against oppressive beliefs. actually, latisha wasn't fighting that. a few days before, the student's professor expressed shock that the girl would offer a draft of her thesis wearing cutoff shorts. so the student retallated, stripping down to her underwear and bra to deliver her actual thesis presentation. she claims her mother who is a sexuality professor would be fine with her in shorts. we have a student protesting p basic decency. then willing to defame her professor to drum up mediadi support. there is a happy ending. she encouraged other students to strip as supporting her, come on, stay with me, strip.

but they insaid went on facebook and supported their professor. sometimes decency does prevail. we'll be right back. mbc doesn't take a day off, and neither will i. and i treat my mbc with new everyday verzenio- the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. in fact, verzenio is a cdk4 & 6 inhibitor for postmenopausal women with hr+, her2- mbc, approved, with hormonal therapy, as an everyday treatment for a relentless disease. verzenio + an ai is proven to help women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. diarrhea is common, may be severe, and may cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infection

that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms may include tiredness, loss of appetite, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising more easily than normal. blood clots that can lead to death have also occurred. talk to your doctor right away if you notice pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain or rapid breathing or heart rate. .. or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low red and white blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. i'm relentless. and my doctor and i choose to treat my mbc with verzenio. be relentless. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio.

>> time for the last bite. in indiana, donald trump hit a homerun with his 2020 campaign slogan. >> my new slogan in 2020, you know what it is? keep america great because we are doing so well that in another two years when we sought a heavy campaign, make america great again wouldn't work out too well. it is going to be keep america great because that is exactly

where we are heading. >> the pres. also said people pay millions of dollars with slogans and campaigns, what was hillary's stronger? he said i paid zipoh, he paid nothing. he is his own campaign consultants. shannon bream is up with a fantastic show, she is killing it. take it away. >> those hats will have 2 change but that will be round 2 of the hats. i am sure they will be bestsellers. big news beginning with this fox news alert, the pres. rallying thousands in indiana spelling out exactly how he feels about a slew of topics including north korea. a showdown between top house republicans and the justice