>> "america's newsroom," sandra is live from windsor castle with a wedding coming up. >> i think somebody is getting married. >> great to be with you. we'll cruise, see you tomorrow. "happening now" starts right now. >> jon: we begin with a fox news alert on fallout from north korea threatening to scrap that summit between president trump and kim jong-un. good morning to you. ifm owe jon scott. >> julie: i'm julie banderas. north korea canceling talks with the south and now the north said it could withdraw from the singapore meeting. the white house says president trump is ready for some very tough negotiations. >> they are exercises legal and planned well in advance. we haven't heard anything from that government or the government of south korea to indicate that we would not continue conducting these

exercises or that we would not continue planning for our meeting between president trump and kim jong-un next month. >> julie: team fox coverage. chief white house correspondent john roberts live with the president's reaction but we begin with greg palkot who joins us live in london. hey, greg. >> some familiar but now alarming words coming from north korea in a statement the regime's leader, the junior foreign secretary saying, we're no longer interested in negotiations that will be all about driving us into a corner and making a one-sided demand to give up our nukes. went on to say this could force kim jong-un to reconsider next month's planned summit. they blasted the u.s./south korea aviation exercises. they called off a meeting for today and blasted president trump's national security advisor john bolton branding

absurd his idea that north korea could give up its nukes like libya did a few years ago. now, most analysts we've been talking to and seeing don't necessarily think north korea wants to pull out of the summit. they kind of see this as posturing, positioning trying to call out rhetoric and actions they don't like but it does call into question a bit their alleged commitment to denuclearization and there is a history on the north korea side of pulling out of deals and commitments. the first chance we'll get to see how hard this break could be or how serious the forward motion is with diplomacy will be next week. they, north korea, have planned to publicly dismantle their one known nuclear test site. if that goes forward maybe this is a tricky ploy. >> jon: in washington says it's hopeful the kim/trump summit

will take place as planned but if not the u.s. will continue their maximum pressure campaign on the regime. >> we have the expected arrival of the president of uzbekistan. we'll keep you updated on that. meantime one of the reasons why north korea says it might put this summit in jeopardy is the joint exercises militarily between the united states and south korea. the other is pointing to something john bolton, the national security advisor, said back on april 29th when he was sitting down with chris wallace mentioning a word that strikes terror and apparently anger into the hearts of north koreans, libya. listen here. >> we have very much in mind the libya model from 2003-2004. there are differences. the libyan program was much smaller. that was basically the agreement that we made.

and so we will want to test north korea in this first meeting for evidence that they have made that strategic decision. >> just a refresher what happened in libya, with libya gadhafi gave up his nuclear program and shipped all his materials to tennessee. that was back in 2003. eight years later gadhafi was overthrown and murdered in the streets. while there was no direct link between the two things it was the arab spring that gave rise to his overthrow kim jong-un is worried about suffering the same fate. they have a longstanding feud with john bolton and said unkind things about him in 2003 when in charge of arms control and international security at the state department. the white house hoping that cooler heads prevail. officials here say they saw it coming and it's typical north korean behavior. >> this is something that we

fully expected. the president is very used and ready for tough negotiations and if they want to meet we'll be ready. if they don't, that's okay, too. we'll continue with the campaign of maximum pressure if that's the case. like i just said if they want to meet, the president will certainly be ready and we will be prepared. if not, that's okay. >> later today after the summit with the president of uzbekistan president trump hosts a round table with officials from several cities in california who are bucking california sanctuary cities law. the president has been making a huge push to eliminate sanctuary cities. the department of justice, of course, has filed a lawsuit against california's sanctuary laws. the president embracing cities opposed to that policy. >> we have to enforce the laws that are on the books. people don't get to decide -- cities don't get to pick and choose which laws they want to follow.

just because it's california doesn't mean you get to decide you don't want to participate in our government and in our system. >> something else going on today. we're hearing from donald trump junior this morning after the senate judiciary committee released hours of testimony from many of the participants in the june 6, 2016 meeting at trump tower. he said i appreciate the opportunity to have assisted the judiciary committee. the public can now see that for over five hours i answered every question asked and was candid and forthright with the committee. i want to thank the members of the committee and their staff for their courtesy and professionalism. 2500 pages of testimony. a long read but john, we're wading our way through. >> jon: you will have a day full of study. >> unlike every other day. >> jon: john roberts. thank you. >> julie: for more on this let's bring in michael mccaul, chairman of the homeland

security committee and serves on the foreign affairs committee. a lot to talk to you about today. i want to start with north korea. thank you for talking to us. north korea is once again playing games. are you surprised the white house was caught offguard by the north pulling out of the summit with south korea? >> i don't think they were caught by surprise. this is a tactic of north korea over the last three presidency, north korea has tried to test us. try to bring us into negotiations and have concessions before we meet at the table. john bolton and pompeo and the president are standing firm that we aren't going to make concessions just to get to the negotiating table. i think that's been the fatal flaw that has happened over the last previous three administrations where the north koreans have played us and continued their nuclear weapons program. >> julie: you know, by threatening to cancel the summit with president trump, pyongyang is sending a clear

message. he thinks he holds the cards. and once eventually has final word the president of this united states is going to follow suit, that's not how this is going to work. kim jong-un does not hold the cards. he needs to understand that. if he keeps down this road, what does the president need to do to show him who is steering the ship? >> the campaign of maximum pressured as opposed to what president obama did with iran to appease them. president trump is putting on maximum pressure through sanctions and china. they have been very helpful in this respect. china does not want north korea to pull out of these negotiations and these talks. i think leveraging china, sanctions, not giving in to this -- kim jong-un is just testing president moon and south korea to see if he will concede on these routine

military exercises. i would advise and caution not to give in to their concessions before you even get to the negotiating table. you want to negotiate out of strength, not out of weakness. >> julie: north korea's vice foreign minister accuses the u.s. of making reckless statements and harboring sinister intentions pointing the finger to john bolton who said recently that north korea could follow a libya model, verifiable denuclearization. pyongyang knows what happened when gadhafi gave up his nuclear program. he was killed. does mike pompeo step in to convince kim jong-un he won't suffer the same fate? mike pompeo has worked hard to bring talks to the table and it could be washed away. >> mike pompeo is a colleague of mine and i have tremendous respect for them. he is the chief diplomat here.

the military works to get the diplomats to the table working together. so i have every faith and confidence that mike will be able to pull this off. there will be a june 12th summit. you know, again, like president kennedy said, let us not fear to negotiate but let us not negotiate out of fear and let's not let kim jong-un bully the united states around. we are a super power and won't stand for a nuclear north korea and to the credit of the maximum campaign we have seen signs of the missiles not being fired and by satellite imagery dismantling some of these nuclear facilities. that's a big step forward. >> julie: right. i want to switch gears now. the senate judiciary has just released transcripts, over 2,000 pages. we're getting through them. i've read some of them. certainly not 2,000 of them. it is regarding the june 2016 trump tower meeting from donald

trump junior's testimony to the committee back in september of 2017 he said he went into the meeting with, quote, skepticism and he said he never told his father about that meeting. that is one of those issues that john mueller has been wanting to harp on. what did you make of that testimony? >> i don't want to comment on mueller has his investigation. certainly with that kind of testimony it's very difficult. as a federal prosecutor, very hard to prove collusion on the part of the father when the father had no knowledge, that being the president. >> julie: all right. thank you so much, sir, for talking us to. we appreciate it. great to have you on. >> jon: well, the u.s. takes new action against iran a week after pulling out of the nuclear deal. as iran's president says president trump might have miscalculated its next move. we'll explain. plus deadly spring storms pounding a large part of the country with powerful winds downing trees and power lines and the danger is not over yet.

>> saw the sky get all black. looked out the window. next thing i knew a tree crashed and sky lit up blue. >> that's all you have to be thankful to god you made it through. you're okay. we're safe. tare. psoriasis does that. it was tough getting out there on stage. i wanted to be clear. i wanted it to last. so i kept on fighting. i found something that worked. and keeps on working. now? they see me. see me. see if cosentyx could make a difference for you- cosentyx is proven to help people with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis... ...find clear skin that can last. don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting cosentyx, you should be checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms. or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. if you have inflammatory bowel disease,

tell your doctor if symptoms develop or worsen. serious allergic reactions may occur. never give up. see me. see me. clear skin can last. don't hold back... ...ask your dermatologist if cosentyx can help you find clear skin that lasts. ...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. i'll take that. [cheers] 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. new ensure max protein. in two great flavors.

new ensure max protein. a cockroach can survive submergede guy. underwater for 30 minutes. wow. yeah, wow.

not getting in today. not on my watch. pests never stop trying to get in. we never stop working to keep them out. terminix. defenders of home. >> jon: fox news alert. as you might have heard the senate judiciary committee has released thousands of documents regarding the 2016 meeting involving donald trump junior and others including representatives from russia inside trump tower. joining us now senator james inhoff, republican from oklahoma. he sits on the armed services committee and chairs the subcommittee on transportation and infrastructure. not on the judiciary committee, senator but the documents are coming out of the judiciary. do you want to characterize what you have heard so far of

what transpired at this meeting or the testimony about it? >> jon, oddly enough and coincidentally i was there in october in the trump tower. there is not a part of that meeting and i don't know what all was released and so until i see what was released, i would hesitate to talk about it. again as you accurately pointed out i'm not on judiciary and so i would know what everybody else knows. >> jon: one of the things that is coming out according to others who were in the room is that donald trump, junior said to one of the russian representatives there, we hear you have some information on hillary clinton and how money is getting funneled into her campaign and the answer was no, i don't have anything on that. i'm just a russian lawyer. where upon donald trump lost interest in the meeting. that was supposed to be the whole impetus for the meeting.

>> it could have been, jon. as i say, oddly enough i was there but not in that meeting and i honestly don't know what -- since it's breaking news right now what will develop from it. sorry about that. >> supporters of the president and the trump campaign are saying this amounts to a great big nothing burger. let's talk about iran for a moment. still in the headlines. i heard that the administration had decided to slap new sanctions on a couple of iranian officials. i thought what is the big deal? these are two individuals. it turns out that one is the head of the central bank. the other works in the international division of iran's central bank and if you sanction those two individuals, any money that they are trying to move around the world on behalf of the iranian

government gets sanctioned, do i have that right? >> you have that right. i have had people call me and say does it really make any difference? you are only -- the brits, french and germans are not a part of this thing so sanction wouldn't effect it. any one doing business with iran would be going through the banks and that would be sanction. it's a heavy sanction and one that will work and overdue and i believe that if you look at what netanyahu said just two weeks ago, he was very emphatic about what hasn't been done that they agreed they would do way back when this thing was put together. i remember that so well. how many people remember today about the 1.3 billion dollars that were passed through to iran that i have every belief was used to advance their -- finance their terrorism? these things are going on. i think we know, it has been -- it is almost as if they're

saying well, they weren't warned of this. we were warned. we were warned in october and january when our president said he is reluctant to continue and not re-certify this. they were warned at that time. they want the sunset provisions they agreed with before. that's not a part of this thing. the real inspections of the non-declared sites. that's not even mentioned. advanced centrifuges. all these things that we were assuming -- i wasn't assuming. this was back during the administration with john kerry at the helm. i wasn't assuming any kind of success at that time. but all these things we know that they've been doing. they have not stopped doing it and so it's a different game in town now. it's -- this president is standing behind the things that he said not only during his election, but as they developed. so i'm very proud of him and i

think the sanctions will work. >> jon: you're saying we know that britain, france, germany, they still maintain relations with iran under the framework of the nuclear deal. you are saying that if french, british, german companies want to do business with iran, these new sanctions that have been imposed would allow the administration to sanction those companies as well? >> that's what i'm saying. i'm saying it does affect them and i think those three countries are very much aware of that. they weren't quite forward enough to come out and say the same thing that i'm saying right now and that our president said. but yes, sanctions are going to affect them and the information or the questions that i get are, are you sure they will actually be affecting those countries? they are going to be. the central bank is significant. anything that's a transaction will be go through the central bank. >> jon: interesting if they

want to do business with the u.s. or the iranians. >> yes, that's a choice. >> jon: good to have you on. thank you. >> julie: intense flames ripping through a historic church dating back to the 1800s. how much damage this fired caused and what we know about how it started. plus two trump-backed candidates winning primaries in nebraska and pennsylvania. what are their chances in november? >> one vote can mean the difference. just one vote can mean the difference between the direction that our country is going, and going back to where we came from. ce there was an orm so small no one thought much of it at all. people said it just made a mess until exxonmobil scientists put it to the test. they thought someday it could become fuel and power our cars wouldn't that be cool? and that's why exxonmobil scientists think it's

not small at all. energy lives here. wi'm really grateful that usaaq. was able to take care of my family while i was overseas serving. it was my very first car accident. we were hit from behind. i called usaa and the first thing they asked was 'are you ok?' they always thank you for your service, which is nice because as a spouse you serve too. we're the hayles and we're usaa members for life. see how much you could save with usaa by bundling your auto and home insurance. get a quote today. never owned a business.e term "small business," there's nothing small about it. are your hours small? what about your reputation, is that small? when you own your own thing, it's huge. your partnerships, even bigger. with dell small business technology advisors you'll get the one-on-one partnership you need to grow your business. because the only one who decides how big your business can be,

is you. the dell vostro 15 laptop, with 7th gen intel® core™ processors.

>> jon: a fire causing major damage to an historic church in milwaukee. flames broke out yesterday afternoon starting on the roof

where construction was taking place. that fire caused it to partially collapse. no injuries reported. that church dates back to 1878. >> julie: wow. trump supporter congressman lou barletta claiming victory in pennsylvania last night. he is now set to challenge incumbent senator bob casey in november in what will likely be one of the biggest races of the mid-terms. senior correspondent eric sean is live in pennsylvania. >> you know, it was a big night for women in pennsylvania. seven women snagged the lines for congress. it could mean the male-dominated. completely male congressional delegation of pennsylvania could be broken in november. monday we ran into and talked with one of those women,

madeleine dean. as far as the senate race, it will be a doozy. lou barletta set to face casey. he was a mayor, made national headlines in 2006 for his tough stance on illegal immigration. he was endorsed by president trump who urged him to run. last night addressing his supporters he portrayed himself as a blue collar working class politician who will reach out to reagan democrats and independents. >> i'll appeal to those democrats and independence in pennsylvania who voted for donald trump. if you were a democrat and independent and voted for donald trump you can't vote for casey who will stop every thing you voted for and the agenda this country is on and the progress we're making in america today. >> casey is a three-term senator one of president trump's harshest critics and called on the president to

resign from office based on the allegations of sexual misconduct. his campaign issued a statement that said in part quote it will be a choice between a candidate who has made it his mission to protect social security, medicare and medicaid and a candidate who has spent years working to undermine, privatize or slash those programs. a choice between a candidate who stands up to president trump when he is wrong and a candidate who believes president trump can do no wrong. as for president trump, he tweeted support and congratulations to barletta calling him a good friend and a special guy. barletta will campaign only as lou so i guess you could say the showdown is going to be lou versus bob in this hard scrabble state. quite a showdown coming here in pennsylvania. julie, back to you. >> julie: thank you. >> jon: this is a busy day for the senate intelligence committee. first it voted to approve gina haspel's nomination to become

the next c.i.a. director. now members are holding a closed-door heating with some high-profile witnesses and the state department pushes back against criticism that opening the new u.s. embassy in jerusalem caused an explosion of deadly violence along the gaza border. >> let's remember how hamas continues to insight violence. if they really wanted peace they would call for peace. we don't see them doing that.

>> jon: a closed-door senate committee hearing underway right now with former top intelligence officials testifying on russian meddling in the 2016 election. peter doocy is live outside that hearing. peter. >> jon, the first update we got came to us from democratic senator joe manchin who said the obama-era intel chiefs who are inside the secure room right now are not talking very much about russians colluding with members of the trump campaign. instead, they're focusing on russian social media activity. >> we've always known russians were involved and active from the 60s, 70s on up. when did they double down? when did they really go after what we found that they have done? we never had social media to this extent in any other election before.

>> today's guest the former c.i.a. director john brennan, former director of national intelligence james clapper and mike rogers. they are here to tell lawmakers where they got the information that came out in january 2017 alleging russian actors interfered in the 2016 election to help candidate trump. rogers says that some of that intel came from the so-called dirty dossier filled with explosive and unverified information compiled by a former british spy named christopher steele. the former c.i.a. chief brennan says the opposite is true and that the dirty dossier did not help american spies arrive at that. somebody not attending is former f.b.i. director james comey who tried to get more money to speed up the russia

probe was invited to come but his lawyer told the committee that comey had a previous engagement. if lawmakers have any questions about russian interference in the election from comey's perspective that aren't answered in his book, they will have to wait. >> jon: any chance you can sneak into that hearing, peter? >> not without getting arrested. >> jon: all right. peter doocy. >> julie: come on, live a little. >> jon: always doing a good job. >> julie: violence escalating between israelis and palestinians. while placing blame on hamas, the terror group that rules gaza. >> we have watched the demonstrations over the past six weeks. these demonstrations are nothing new. our embassy was set to open for quite some time when the

president announced it late last year. other countries as well have that announced they're opening they are embassy as well. if hamas wants to use it as an excuse to rile people up and to encourage violence, that's their choice. it is an irresponsible choice. >> julie: let's bring in walid phares fox news national security and foreign policy expert. thank you, walid. these are very complicated times and that has been the case for decades now. the question is, is the force used by israel too much force? that's what the international community is questioning. how do you believe israel handled this and what do you believe of the international community who is calling upon israel to use restraint? >> first of all the images that the international community, the media, all of us have seen of civilians being shot or being wounded obviously are emotionally very much aggressive. and that explains why the international public opinion is trying to find answers.

however, the matters that aren't answered is who organized that? it wasn't israel who went to gaza to organize that. it was hamas who organized that. it is very simple. thousands and thousands of people, civilians and militants cannot leave their homes on the morning, go onto buses and go to the frontiers that are divided into large group and engage in the demonstration and the israelis responded when there was a fire against them. without an organization. in the middle east everybody knows this is hamas. the big question is what does hamas want from those kind of violence that they begin and, of course, with the rules of engagement we end up with these civilians being killed or maimed. >> julie: we know that hamas is using gaza and its two million people as a defense mechanism. they're using them and sacrificing them in order to continue this battle that has been going on for decades and

decades. the question now is what is the next step forward? how does the u.s. mend its conflicts with arab allies in the region who believe that perhaps israel should use restraint? as we know, hamas will continue and continue to sacrifice these protestors' lives. at what point does it stop? >> if i may address one matter has to do with the hamas strategic intention why they're doing this. i don't believe it's about the opening of the embassy. if that was the case, then you -- we would have seen demonstrations, aggressive ones in the west bank. what happened? they aren't there. or hezbollah, an ally to hamas massing on the lebanese, israeli borders or from jordan. why hamas is doing this, it is an ally to the iranian regime. in my projection this is response by iran to the united states and has to do more with

the iran deal than with the opening of the embassy in jerusalem. >> julie: tuesday marked catastrophe day, anniversary which the palestinians mark of israel's occupation in 1948 when it became a state and palestinians had to flee. if palestinians feel they have nothing to lose at this point, how does the international community even begin talks for peace? >> first of all, you have to remove the card hamas has in its own hands. they eliminated the palestinian authority from gaza 10 years ago. what needs to be done is take the words that have been said at the united nations. if i'm the one who would make the suggestion, all right, united nations, why don't you deploy between israel and gaza, take 10 kilometers wide band. will hamas except that? no. they want the borders to continue the pressure for higher designs.

>> julie: walid phares, great to get your insight. thank you for joining us. >> jon: a massive cloud of ash prompting a red alert for airplanes flying over hawaii. what experts are saying about the potential for another eruption. plus president trump about to hold a white house round table on sanctuary cities as he calls for tougher enforcement of immigration laws. details on that just ahead. >> president trump: ms-13 gang members called for the assassination of new york city police officers so the gang could, quote, take back the streets. they got it wrong. we are the ones who are taking back the streets.

>> julie: and we're going to take you to the white house now as president trump is about to greet the president of uzbekistan.

these two basically bilateral talks. nothing major expected to come out of this meeting but a meeting we need to take note of. >> jon: we'll take you back there live as soon as the president of uzbekistan arrives. >> president trump: we are calling on congress to secure our borders, support our border agents, stop sanctuary cities, and shut down policies that release violent criminals back into our communities. we don't want it any longer. we've had it. enough is enough. >> jon: president trump wants to get tougher on illegal immigration as he prepares to host a white house round table with california lawmakers on that state's sanctuary policies. let's bring in our panel.

kris wilson was a campaign pollster for ted cruz and part of opinion research. scott bolden is former chairman of the democratic party in washington, d.c. thank you both for being here. scott, wouldn't you love to be a fly on the wall at that meeting between the president and a bunch of representatives of the state of california? >> it will be a love fest for them and they would sit around the table and convince themselves of what their positions are, then go forth, young men and women. reality is i think that some of the dems and those who support sanctuary cities to have a thoughtful dialogue should be in on that meeting not to argue but be constructive about how this is going to happen. the lawsuits will resolve it legally but as a practical matter the states do have jurisdiction over how they interact with their folks and whether they cooperate with ice or not. the feds have control over immigration and they have sole

control over that. this has to be resolved. both sides don't want criminal illegal immigrants in their communities but there is a divide when it comes to immigrants who are illegal solely because they came across the border looking for the american dream. >> jon: the president's position seems to be that exactly what you get if you establish a sanctuary city or in this case a sanctuary state. you get violent criminal illegal aliens flocking to certain places where they won't be subject to a lot of scrutiny. >> the first part of your statement isn't true. i don't think anybody listening or on this program believes that every immigrant that comes over the border illegally is a violent criminal. i don't want violent criminals here either and not one democrat wants them here either. >> jon: that's not what i'm saying. those who are violent and have criminal backgrounds will flock to the places where they know they won't get a lot of scrutiny from local officials. >> ice has jurisdiction over that. i don't think people who are

violent criminals, they ought to be stopped and sent back. under the barack obama administration, he was not popular with the hispanic americans in this country, either. he was the deporter in chief. this is a tough issue politically but we have practical problems with this border control but also what we do with the kids who are with their parents and really their parents who are looking for the american dream and need to come in legally. if they can't and want asylum. lots of different issues. dems and republicans have to get together on it. >> jon: chris, tough issue politically. this president was elected clearly with a very tough anti-illegal immigration component to his platform. >> he was. if what scott was saying is the position of most democrats we probably could agree. where he is probably not that far from where i am but not where the democratic party is or the position of the left. i think the fact that left is fighting so strong to try to take immigration off the table as an issue and making it about

breaking up families. it isn't. when they come to the united states and are a criminal they should be deported. constitutional authority gives authority over immigration to the federal government. would be tantamount to washington, d.c. where scott was democratic chairman nobody in washington has to serve in the military. that is not the way the constitution works. the federal government has control over it and cal is skirting the laws. it is a sign of how broken the left is that they can't do what scott did is come and try to find common ground. they fight donald trump every step of the way. what he is trying to do are reasonable changes. not much more than what barack obama did to say let's take the cities that are protecting the illegal immigrants. let's make sure ice has authority to take them and deport them out of the united states. that's pretty simple. >> jon: i want to play a bit of an exchange between senator

harris of california and nielsen, the homeland security secretary. >> your agency will be separating children from their parents. >> what we'll be doing is prosecuting parents who have broken the law as we do every day in the united states of america. >> i can appreciate that. but if that parent has a 4-year-old child, what do you man on doing with that child ?ao >> it goes to hhs for care and custody. >> they will be separated from their parents. >> like we do every day. >> jon: somebody in this country native born american robs a bank, let's say it's a woman. they'll take the child away if that woman goes to prison. >> not necessarily. as a former prosecutor let me say this. the big difference is these are either folks who are u.s. citizens or here legally or even here illegally if they're in the system and daca folks those kids aren't being separated from them. they can go to a family member.

here even at the border if you're separating them because donald trump wants it to be a deterrent to tell illegal immigrants if you come across the border you will be separated from your kids. guess what? that policy isn't working. even when they do separate the kids, there was a report last year by dhs that said we lost track of 20% of the kids that were separated. guess what? illegal immigration is up. so that policy is not working. people are facing wanting the american dream faster and harder and as much now as ever despite donald trump. you cannot take these kids from these illegal parents bringing them here. you can't do it. it is not the american way. >> scott and harris are not the same. she is saying regardless of the crime an illegal immigrant commits they shouldn't be separated from their child. someone robs a bank in the united states even if they're a united states citizen is separated from their child. that's the way the law works.

california is again trying to stop that from being the case with illegal immigrants giving them superior rights to american citizens. >> not more rights. they shouldn't -- >> if they commit a crime they should >> absolutely. >> they go to jail. that's not what harris? . >> i don't think that's her position. that can't be per position. she is a former attorney general. at the border they shouldn't be separating them. get kamala harris on your show next time. >> jon: good discussion, thank you both. >> julie: they're set to walk down the aisle just days from now but there is new drama surrounding the royal wedding of prince harry and meghan markle with her father not showing up and that's not all. next.

and don't worry i have everything handled. i already spoke to our allstate agent, and i know that we have accident forgiveness. which is so smart on your guy's part. like fact that they'll just... forgive you... four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allstate is worth it. >> tech: don't wait for a chip like this to crack your whole windshield. with safelite's exclusive resin, you get a strong repair that you can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace.

>> jon: a fox news alert and just a moment ago the president of uzbekistan arrived at the white house. there is president trump to greet him. you don't hear a lot about uzbekistan but it is a neighbor of afghanistan. for about four years in the early 2,000s the u.s. flew out of an air base in uzbekistan. we were kicked out of that base but the president would like to keep relations good with a country neighboring afghanistan. that's part of the reason for this meeting and we'll keep an eye on it and let you know what transpires if we get any word. >> julie: new drama days ahead of the royal wedding all coming from the bride's side. what else is new? with meghan markle's family providing a lot of tabloid fodder. jonathan hunt is live in los

angeles. if people cared about my wedding i had more drama going on than this family. what did her dad do? >> julie, this wedding may be in windsor but the drama is 6,000 miles away south of where i'm sitting across the border in mexico where meghan markle's dad, thomas, lives and has been at the center of a will he, won't he saga? meghan wants her dad to walk her down the aisle. first saying he would, then deciding he wouldn't in the wake of a bizarre story involving him staging some photos of himself with paparazzi, then saying he would again because he wanted to be part of history. that's a quote. now he is probably maybe, possibly, definitely not going because he told his chosen media outlet tmz he is undergoing heart surgery today and won't be able to fly. meghan markle's half sister blamed the tabloid press for hounding her 73-year-old father while meghan's half brother

called thomas wrote an open letter to prince harry warning him to call off marrying meghan. it caused some brit to roll their eyes as the american reality show nature of the markle brits. they hope they can rise above the past behavior of their parents. my mom says, the arbiter of all things royal, she just wants harry to be happy. that's the final word from mom. >> julie: i love seeing average people like these people -- not really. keep it right here for all the news about the royal wedding. our special coverage of the big event begins at 6:00 a.m. on saturday anchored by sandra smith and shepard smith at windsor castle. >> jon: the senate judiciary committee releases testimony of

donald trump, junior about the meeting at trump tower. what has he told investigators? that's ahead on "outnumbered." eyes. i know, i know what a bath is... smile honey. this thing is like... first kid. here we go. second kid. you coming in mommy? ahh not a chance! by their second kid, every parent is an expert and more likely to choose luvs than first time parents. luvs with nightlock plus absorbs wetness faster than huggies snug and dry for outstanding overnight protection at a fraction of the cost. live, learn and get luvs.

mitzi: psoriatic arthritis tries to get in my way? watch me. ( ♪ ) mike: i've tried lots of things for my joint pain. now? watch me. ( ♪ ) joni: think i'd give up showing these guys how it's done? please. real people with active psoriatic arthritis are changing the way they fight it. they're moving forward with cosentyx. it's a different kind of targeted biologic. it's proven to help people find less joint pain and clearer skin. don't use if you are allergic to cosentyx. before starting cosentyx you should be checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. mitzi: with less joint pain, watch me.

for less joint pain and clearer skin, ask your rheumatologist about cosentyx. that skills like teamwork, attention to detail, and customer service are critical to business success. like the ones we teach here, every day.

>> thanks for joining us on this weekend. >> "outnumbered" starts now. >> harris: fox news alert. we are waiting for possible reaction from president trump as he meets with the president of uzbekistan in the oval office right now. one of the most pressing issues for the trump administration is north korea threatening to walk away from the summit. a short time ago, the white house said they are moving forward as planned. this is "outnumbered". i upon melissa franzis. we have katie pavlich, host of kennedy, kennedy herself. and leslie marshal and joining us on the