i will find a way to shut up a little bit. we will always be fair and balanced. we are not the destroy trump media. let not your heart be troubled big interview tonight. thanks for sharing a preview of the interview with mayor rudy giuliani. >> laura: i thought you were going to say a convicted felon or a liberal?e the convicted felon looks pretty good. >> sean: i have a really good story asking me if your kids were this and this and this, i said i don't care as long as they are not a liberal. >> laura: good evening. this is "the ingraham angle." buckle up. we have a huge show. in just a moment my exclusive. interview with rudy giuliani. the president's senior legal. counsel. he has a message from bob. mueller and new details about.

his team's legal strategy. first the resistance for. america's failure. that's the focus of tonight's. "angle." kim jong-un is threatening to. cancel the june 12th peace. summit. democrats rejoiced. yes, they did the north korea. dictator's foreign minister is. taking issue with u.s. military. exercises under way with south. korea. even though these are exercises. that are conducted every single. year. the north koreans are agitated. that the hermit kingdom should. commit to a complete. denuclearization similar to.

libya in 2004. that really set the north korean foreign minister off. he said it is essentially a manifestation of a sinister move to impose the destiny of iraq due to the yielding of their whole countries to big powers. north korea's varicy location is expected. what i saw and what i heard when i woke up this morning was eveni more disturbing than what north korea is pulling here. american commentators wearing their see, i told you so smirks reveling in what could be bad news for their own country. they were dancing on the grave of the peace summit. and why? for the sole reason that it

would embarrass president trump. >> if you would look at history, he would be a little more, what's the word, careful about bragging. >> donald trump has an aversion. he's allegerric to complexity and allergic to history. >> north korea can sense that desperation on trump's part. >> i think there was a tendency to be doing an end zone dance in anticipation of having scored something. he's doingoi it on his own 20-yd line. >> do you think he ever played football? >> laura: johnyo brennan with hs disingenuineness chimed in saying this turn of events is unsurprising since donald trump seems ready with a fire, aim

process that is fraught with pitfalls, potential disasters? to me it sound like the cia under brennan's leadership. if the media weren't so into white house rivalries, maybe they could see how petty and, yes, unamerican they seem today. we are talking about the possibility of doing something profoundly good for the united states and for our allies throughout asia, achieves peace and bringing north korea out of the dark ages of human rights, that's a critical objective. trump has already done the unexpected. he has helped liberate american hostages from north korea's hand and opened up the possibility for real peace. he's changed the dynamic.

the state department said they have no official indication from north korea that the summit is off and the president is planning to be there. every united states citizen regards will of their political party or personal feelings towards the president should want the summit to happen. and, of course, for it to be successful. the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent people are potentially at stake here, ending the possibility of thermonuclear war? that's more important than scoring cheap political points a president you didn't vote for, don't you think? and that's the angle. and now my interview with rudy giuliani. we are joined with rudy giuliani. you made a lot of news last time

you were on this network. what was the issue? reimbursement of payments to michael cohn forim the stormy daniels' settlement. now we find out the president did disclose this. was this done a couple of weeks because you knew this was coming out? >> sure, absolutely. the president was aware of it. we wouldn't do it without him. the obe, office of government ethics agreed with us that it has been fully disclosed. i have little disagreement with him, i don't believe it had to be disclosed at all. >> you say it's an expenditure. >> they say it's a liability. >> which is important for campaigngn finance? > disclosure purposes.

we are going to disclose t. >> this is what he said, oge concluded that the payment made byt mr. cohn is reported to be a liability. the information provided in the note sheet meets the disclosure. >> we agree with that. we do not agree, i don't agree that it's a liability. i know the nature of it. it doesn't matter at this point. >> laura: another former ethics officer says this is tantamount to a criminal referral. >> no, it's not. >> laura: walter schwab is saying our government ethics officer has gotten him. this is tantamount to a criminal

referral. >> he can't disclose more than he knows. it vindicates our original strategy and the fact that mueller should bring this to a close. it's been a year, he's gotten 1.4 million documents, interviewed 28 witnesses and he has nothing. that's why he wants to bring the president to an interview. tell uss what you have to get from an interview that you don't already have. he has all the facts to make a decision. >> laura: why would you agree to an interview now? given everything that has been discovered about documents and the possible an must toward the president, why would you agree under any circumstances to allow president trump to go in there? >> there would be a narrow area where wegr might agree if they could tell us why they need it. they have 1.4 million documents, witnesses.he if they disbelieve him, they

disbelieve him. the fact is we would have to know what is it you want clarified. if we knew that and they told us, if we gave the explanation, they were going to end it, fine. this is not good for the american people. the special counsel's office doesn't have that understanding that they are interfering with things much bigger than them or us. >> laura: you said there is a plan b and c if mueller doesn't wrap this up. you are aware how much time this takes to answer this, ongoing investigation, bill clinton found that out. what is plan b and c? >> we are going to demand an answer. we cooperated beyond any other president cooperated, all those documents, 1.4 million. >> laura: what's the plan b and c? firing mueller? >> we start from day one again. what we are going to do, we are going to see what kind of legal

remedies are available to us including, if they subpoena us, challenge the subpoena. the same reason they can't indict him. >> laura: which mueller agreed. >> i don't think they agreed to the process question. they can't issue a subpoena to him. remember, clinton opposed the subpoena and then voluntarily complied. heub didn't give up presidential prerogative. >> laura: your old pal, michael on msnbc said the following. >> these folks can't get their stories straight, they can't figure out what they want to do. what they should be doing is telling theul truth. mr. giuliani asti recently as a week ago has been lying to the american people how this occurred, because according to today it occurred in 2017.

>> i don't think i ever changed that. the payment to her took place in 2017. the reimbursement is 2016. he is a make believe lawyer. >> laura: california bar is now investigating him. >> i don't want to talk about him. i want to talk about mueller. >> laura: you are not worried about cohn? >> we are completely uninvolved in that. we are gotten assurances we are not involved in that. it's only about mueller getting this over with. >> laura: the head of that left leaning ethics group crew, committee for responsible ethics in washington has said because we just learned about this liability recently that the president disclosed, we are wondering what other liabilities

are out there. they issued a long statement. they were involved in filing tht action that led to the disclosure of the statements. >> i don't know what he's talking about. >> laura: other liabilities he may have taken on. >> i can't respond to the president's enemies. their statements are not worth anything. everybody t knows they have this annimous to the president. >> laura: how many letters do you have? >> we have two. things we need to know. we have no response from them. >> laura: you are asking for -- >> we are asking for what do they really need to know, what kind of assurances to we have that we'll get it over quickly like they did for clinton. we didn't ask, although i wanted to, they overruled me.

i wanted to ask for hillary clinton treatment, the report two weeks in advance clearing my client. i wanted an interview, questions in advance. >> laura: there is concern that the d.o.j. is not turning over documents unless they are threatened with contempt of congress. deven nunes has been maligned by the media. what is your sense, given your background as u.s. attorney, your vast experience as a u.s. attorney, what's going on -- >> i was the associate attorney general. pretty much the role that rosenstein has. i can't imagine not complying with a request for such sensitive documents with congress. they won't give up the authorization to proceed against

maniford. judge ellis layed into them pretty hard. they are the darlings of the media. all of a sudden their inten grayty is put in question about kind of the tactics they have used indicting manafort. 2005, president didn't know manafortrt in 2005. if he did, there was no meaningful relationship. >> laura: you follow the story that was broke about the russian ologarc. he had a diplomatic visa. and he's visited by the fbi, very well sourced. and they say we have this idea that paul manafort was colluding with the russians for the trump campaign and implicit do you

want to help news the conversation. and darapasca, who can't stand manafort, he laughs him out of the room. what does that tell you that the fbi is controlling this theory? >> they are doing what they are used to. one of their principal litigators was held to be responsible for not turning over exculpatory evidence. if we walked into a hearing, i don't know what they wouldn't tell us. they have all the exculpatory evidence. look what he's accomplished with all this on his back, it's like a bigs weight on his back, kore,

china. >> laura: ongoing. > iran, doing away with that ridiculous sell-out agreement. >> laura: marco rubio was asked about this push to use this oligarch an he said this. >> if there is a conflict of interest, it would jeopardize the investigation. >> that's right. what about placing a spy in the trump campaign. >> laura: do you believe that happened? >> i don't know. >> laura: does the president believe thatt happened? >> i don't think we want to believe it or not, people who break into manafort's home in the morning in a white collar case when he was producing documents, and breaking into cohn's law office? i never did that. i also had the benefit of an interview in deciding whether tt prosecute. these guys are going way beyond.

it's a shame to the justice department because they are politically frightened, and say you have to abide by our rules. >> laura: stay right there. more of my interview with rudy giuliani in just a minute. you got to hear his answer to this. do you have a sense how these things tend to do that there is any chance that bob mueller gave immunity to jim comey. in the aisle - without starting any conversations- -or paying any upcharges. what can i say? control suits me. go national. go like a pro.

>> ♪ >> laura: welcome b >> laura: welcome back. more of my interview with the president's attorney, rudy giuliani. even buried in the new york times piece today, nothing publicly disclosed ties the trump campaign or the president

himself to these dealings with the russians. you have to look past the headline all the way to that. >>ne that's been true from day one. it's true today. they are not going to be able to invent any evidence of that. it's a shame that they have -- plus they won't answer congress on how much money this is costing the american people. it's costing a fortune.ti these guys, they can't get a good job. >> laura: you get the sense they are going to focus on an obstruction claim. >> to recommend impeachment? they get to send a report to rosenstein on what they found. they could include a recommendation. butlu really, they shouldn't. >> laura: or the facts that would indication or facts amounting to -- >> a memo thatrebuts them all a

thousand percent. >> laura: trump tower meetings. >> which he wasn't present at. >> laura: don trump, jr., the transcript notes of his talk with the senate came out.ee he said he it not have a memory about talking to his father with it specifically. then they are focusing on this blocked call he made that day, he doesn't remember if it was to his father orth not. that's the theory they are spinning out. >> since i believe it took place in the office, it would have been easy for him. >> laura: june of 2016. >> that's about when he joined the campaign. nobody is going to focus on a russian woman who says she has information about hillary, turns out she wants to negotiatens sanctions and they throw her out. to meet again, they don't want to meet with her. i remember that. k i have people saying all sorts

ofar things about hillary. >> laura: the headlines, cnn, don, jr., admits he was looking for dirt on hillary. >> and they weren't looking for dirto. on donald trump? there is nothing illegal about that. even if it comes from a russian or german, doesn't matter. and they never used it is the main thing. they rejected it. if there was collusion with the russians, they would have used it. >> laura: do you think in the end when you look at all the main flash points, trump tower meeting, stormy daniels payment, the raid on manafort, raid on cohn, is there one thing that is more concerning? >> inability to reach a

conclusion and unwilling to recognize the damage this does to our country. there is no reason for this investigation. this was engineered by comey with the report, not the report, the interview thing that he wrote that he should have never revealed,ul which he illegal, through a professor. >> laura: d.o.j. is releasing those documents on that particular professor. >> comey should be under investigation. the clinton people wanted him fired before we did. then this argument she shouldn't be prosecuted. >> laura: do you have any information or sense given your background how these things tend to go, that there is any chance that bob mueller gave immunity to jim comey? >> i don't.

i have no idea if he gave him immunity. i haven' no idea why he's not being investigated. that troubles us. a lot of the president's statements contradict comey. if you want to believe comey, you are walking him into a trap. and comey has not been investigated. i don't think we would sit him down for an interview unless comey was investigated. >> laura: this it lawyer -- >> jay goldberg. >> i told him i didn't think that giuliani was the right person for him to select. i thought that there were much better people that he could use in terms of negotiating with mueller. >> i guess i beat him too many times. [laughter] jay is get a little old. probably are better people. a the only thing that i have is

the president trusts me and i trust the president and i have his back in the right way. i would represent any president put through this kind of torture. this is not right for our country. i'm doing it pro bono. i'm doing it because i believe this is just plain wrong. >> laura: the family, the stakes on the family. you mentioned ivanka. you said jared is disposable. >> no, i was kidding. jared loved it. he said did my wife tell you to say that? no. i'm 'tis poseable, too. >> laura: you are not worried about that exposure because of the meeting with the russian banker? >> none of it was about getting herr e-mails. it was about dirty information they alleged to have. they didn't have it. so end of story. >> laura: i'm talkingng about te meeting jared had back in

december. >> totally different business thing. has nothing to do with the russians. >> laura: i think if youu orderd a white russian at the tea room. >> i haven't been to russia in four, five years. >> laura: do you have any concern that there is no real way at this point to get a fair outcome by a special council that many very well respected lawyers think was begun, named on spurious, fraudulent grounds? >> i'm confident if we have to, i would be vindicated in court. i'm still hopeful that when it comes down to it, they are not going to impair their reputations. >> laura: you are not going to court, he's going to be interviewed. he's going to be in congress. >> i'm challenging the

legitimacy of their authority and the way they spanned it out so much. >> laura: you maintain that the expansion of this probe as it's been expanded is illegitimate. >> what they did with manafort, cohn, possibly placing a spy in the trump campaign, all these things are areas where indictments have i dismissed. i do not understand what bob was thinking of hiring these people. >> laura: are you concerned about any of the former trump white house staffers? i know hope hicks, her name was thrown around, the statement about the trump tower meeting, are you worried about her conversations with the special counsel? these are young kid. >> give me 1,001 prosecutions. they are false statements not under oath. that would be really cheap. >> laura: he's turning the

screws on people, not because he cares about manafort, 2004, 2007 banking issues, he cares about getting at trump. >> how could manafort, 2004, 2005 activity have anything to do with it. >> laura: but manafort is different from a 30-year-old or 25-year-old, who is like i'm not going to lose my lifely hood. you know how they operate. >> i worked with hope. >> laura: she's fantastic. she's not going to lie. >> you know what they can do. you know how they work. you said this here, i have an e-mail here. then all of a sudden you are shaking. >> if they did that to her, then the justice department would have to step in and act. it would be total injustice. have done a few injustices. >> laura: what is your t time le to wrap this up? >> today.

as soon as possible. they have the facts from which they can write the report. if you can write a fair report, write it. if you can write an unfair report, we'll combat t we are ready to rip them apart if that's what we want. we would rather peacefully settle this and get it over with. >> laura: rudy giuliani, always great to see you. stay right there, we have expert legal analysis on what we just heard coming up. our own brett bear and the white water prosecutor who grilled president clinton join me, next.

>> ♪ >> laura: welcome back. let's get reaction to my exclusive interview with rudy giuliani from our own all-star panel. earl, bret baier in new york tonight. the author of the huge new soon to be best seller "new york times," 3 days in moscow. ronald reagan and the fall of

the soviet empire. and former whitewater counsel, sal. sal what did you take away from that interview with rudy? >> well, i look at everything like this as an interview as the performance level and the substantive level. at the performance level, he did a very good job. this is what he should have done from the beginning. he was much more polished, he knew more. that was good. many statements were incorrect and some were preposterous and some were arguments and opinions. there is no way that the person under investigation or his attorney getson to say it's beea year, that's too much. but again, in terms of performance, i thought he did pretty well. >> laura: let's play the first sound byte from this interview with the question whether thees

president himself can be indicted. reason they can't indict him, they can't issue a subpoena to him. clinton opposed the subpoena. his administration said they m can't do that. >> laura: brett, it's interesting, the judgege made a point earlier today. he said when mueller said we are not going to indict the president because we are going to stand by this justice department advisory opinion that you can't indict a sitting president. this was in 1999 advisory opinion, it wasn't binding. so if mueller wanted to change his approach on that he could, which i found interesting. >> i thought that was a fascinating part of the interview. rudy is hanging on to that, that the team may have told him that about the indictment and staying

to the guidelines from the clinton years. his answers suggested they are getting ready for a fight over a possible subpoena and whether that's legitimate and how they can fight that if they don't want the president to sit down under the guidelines they have set up. >> laura: and you heard, let w them put on the table what they have. we are going to take them to court on these issues. we'll rip it apart and rip them apart. that's kind of like one-ups-manship. whatn about the substance on the subpoena? >> he's o completely wrong. i mean, the first subpoena issued and served on a president was by john marshall on thomas jefferson in 1807. there was a subpoena served on madison. we know about18 the subpoena served on president nixon and

the supreme court ruled that the president had to obey it. so he's completely wrong. the olc opinion, to my knowledge, only talks about whether or not you can indict a president. president clinton didn't fight the subpoena from judge star. heud asked us to withdraw it and said he would come if we did and that's what happened. we don't know if we would have fought it, i don't think he would have fought it. if he is subpoenaed. and invokes executive privilege,s that president trump, and a court ruled against him, he can say you have made your law, see if you can enforce it. supreme court said twice that orders have to be obeyed. cooper versus aaron and u.s. versus nixon. he can say i'm the president, i'm not going to do it.

then we have an interesting constitutional crisis on hand. >> laura: i brought up the issue of staffers. we know that special counsel brought in a number of the close staff, former staff of the president of the united states, and this is how the discussion went. let's watch. >> arere you concerned about any of the former trump white house staffers? i know hope hicks, her name was thrown around and working with don, jr., on the statement about the trump tower meeting. are you worried about her statements? >> that would be cheap. >> laura: he's turning the screws on her. >> the justice department would have to step in and act. >> but listen, you have jim comey who told me he didn't know what this whole thing about michael flynn was. but lawmakers saying he told them that the fbi agents didn't believe that michael flynn was

lying.g. yet, the screws were put on to michael flynn and he eventually pled guilty. it moved forward. so you can imagine the screws being put potentially to a lot of these other staffers who have done interviews. i think the politics of this is interesting. i can see the comfort that president trump has and rudy ruy being a fighter for him. michael horowitz may have a lot of details that have yet to be revealed. >> laura: your book, three days over moscow, the president, president regan, he goes to moscow in 1988. he gives a speech. think about korea, whether the summit will happen or not happen, i wonder if there will be a day, it would be great, if we could have president trump go

to north korea or unified korea and speak to a mixed group of students from the north and south. think about how wild that would be. no one thought it was possible to go to moscow. >> it was only dreamed about. he's a president that was talking about anticommunist feelings and thoughts even back when he was screen actors guild president. and here he was delivering a speech in moscow. i think it's possible.om it's touch and go with this jun. this is the north koreans as you said at the beginning. it's part of laying the ground work for what they are trying to get done. >> laura: thanks so much. why are a group of republicans trying to give nancy pelosi run of the floor? steve scalise gives us the inside story on this threat to

the president's agenda.

disbhnch ♪ >> the house is now just five bop votes away from bringing several daca bills to the floor. it's a parliamentary tactic to get around the g.o.p. leadership that we told you about last night. so-called moderate republicans and democrats are working together to advance a bill that would give amnesty to dreamers. that's their ultimate goal. speaker ryan calls it pointless because the president would veto it. let's get the details from house majority whip, steve scalise. this is upsetting to a lot of us. in 2007 the amnesty thing went down in flames. 2014, 2018, it was so bad. now here we are in the midterm

elections, we need everybody unified. and these open borders republicans are pushing this move. what's happening? >> first of all, good to be back with you. i don't want to see this discharge petition move. i'm a sponsor of a bill which does address all of the different pillars. >> laura: chain migration. >> secure the border and address daca, which was a problem that barack obama created. he said bring your kid. it's still illegal, we'll just look the other way and let somebody else fix it. president trump wants to solve this problem and we are working to getwe a solution. but blanket amnesty with no border protection and no wall is not the answer. >> laura: you had a big meeting yesterday, it got heated. that's the feeling? is this a big divide? >> immigration has always been a complicated issue. you can see the different

approaches we want to take. >> laura: what did the president run on, law and order on the border, and congress passes a bill that doesn't fund the wall. the president was led to believe it did. >> there's about 110 new miles of wall.wa but what we want is a long-termg solution, the full funding for the wall. but the other issues are important, too. that's interior enforcement. secretary nielsen will tell you, these catch and release, a fellen can come out of prison and she can't deport him. we need to end those problems. friend of mine have worked hard on those provisions to make sure we can get back to rule of lawe and secure our border.o that's the approach we would like to take working with president trump who wants to solve the problem. >> laura: this is what nancy pelosi said about this. >> bring up the bill. bring p all the bills. we believe this bipartisan bill

that the members have put together who share the value protecting the dreamers is the bill that would win. we have an answer, there is as path, let's get it done. and if not, why not. >> laura: everyone watching should know the 20 republicans pushing this discharge petition are with the person you just saw on the screen, nancy pelosi. that is shocking. we have 40% of americans, congressman scalise, who says the country is going in the right direction. >> and the number is growing. he's getting the economy going, working with issues that are the most meaningful. you look at nancy pelosi, she s said she would raise taxes and try to undo the tax cuts. when nancy pelosi was speaker, she never tried to fix this problem.

it wasn't until they lost the majority, they never tried to solve daca. we want to solve the problem but in a way that restores rule of law and builds the wall. >> laura: you and mccarthy have been holding the line on that, reflecting the will of the people. jeff, big liberal republican, i'm suree he's a friend of your, he was on the tucker show tonight and he said this is the way to deliver a solution to tha president. the president want a solution, this is the answer. he said there are a lot of bills are possible, but we are delivering a solution that will stop the 500,000 people a year crossing the border. >> jeff is a friend, but we disagree strongly. that's the wrong approach. wes want to work with president trump to find a solution. proposing some idea that's going to bring the dream act to the

floor and possible something like the dream act which is bank equity amnesty for more than 3 million people, that's not only the right answer, but president trump would veto the bill. >> laura: why are they doing it? >> we try to get a solution to president trump. >> laura: are they trying to embarrass the president? >> at the come from districts where they want to do different. >> laura: you are too nice. i'm fromre connecticut. >> we have street brawling, too. at the end of the day, we want to get this problem solved. >> laura: great to see you. come back soon. we h have been telling you about the growing wave of opposition to the california state sanctuary law. >> for me and my constituents, these are democrats, republicans, independents, they don't want to see another

filing. >> laura: state assembly woman joins us for an inside scoop on the meeting with the president. stay there. including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist. ♪ most people come to la with big dreams. ♪ we came with big appetites. with expedia, you could book a flight, hotel, car, and activity all in one place. ♪

>> ♪ >> ♪ >> laura: at the white house >> laura: at the white house president met with city, county leaders fighting the state sanctuary law. >> thank you for inviting us.s. there are more people in california than you know who support what you are doing, from san francisco to los angeles. of people whoons want to see that our borders are secure and our neighborhoods are safe. >> we have a lot of folks in california, they don't talk about it, but they want the walm up. >> laura: let's find out what

happened. california assembly woman, melissa, it was quite a group. all of you from california, all of you are unified against this sanctuary state law. what was the president's reaction? all behind you, unified feeling? >> a little bit of love-fest. it wasul nice to have a roomfulf peoplera that feel the same way. we are sympathetic. but we want the laws enforced and everybody to follow the laws. >> laura: what's next for you? you have your votes and you feel good in the moment.en then what happens? >> i have been in the legislature for five years, governor brown i has never once invited a republican to come in and talk about these issues. president trump has been in office less than two years. ien don't think president trumps going to take his foot off the

gas. >> laura: was there anyny democrats in the room? >> no. >> laura: it wasn't a big bipartisan group, it was republicans and we are seeing the results of essentially a super majority state in this country, which is the way california works. >> hopefully not for long. >> laura: how does this play with your electorate? you saw that california berkeley poll that came out, 59% of californians think it's somewhat or very important to do deportation. it's a great issue. >> i think the democrats are overplaying their hand. i do a town hall every month, i have legal immigrants who come and they are angry. i think the democrats, the they aren't holding town halls. if they were, they would hear from people who say knock it off. >> laura: you are hurting

communities, you are hurting law enforcement, people aren't going to step forward to report crime. >> that's a bunch of baloney. that's their way of protecting the way they want to conduct their lawlessness. >> laura: what's in it for them? >> i don't know. a lot of people say it's the votes. >> laura: you think they are voting in elections? >> it seems unusual that every other law in california they want you to follow except for immigration laws. >> laura: you have a lot of laws, try to start a small business in california, see how easy it is. we'll be back in a moment withid something that didn't get the attention that it deserved. ♪ stay together with a $0 copay, you've got zero reasons to leave, and every reason to stay. lantus is used to control high blood sugar in people with diabetes. do not use lantus

to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar which can be life-threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose of insulin .. each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins like lantus may cause heart failure that can lead to death. stay together with the lantus $0 copay. ♪ let's stay together talk to your doctor or visit saveonlantus.com.

>> there was a touching moment from the annual peace officer's memorial service at the capital.

embracing donald trump in this photo was adriana malloy, mother of nypd detective familia killed in the line of duty last year. god bless her. is that a picture that did not get enough attention. that is all the time we have tonight. shannon bream is up next. shannon: donald trump's attorney rudy giuliani made major news, we have instant reaction tonight. the california rebellion against the resistance comes to washington, prominent rebels to tell us if the pres. is giving them the help they need when it comes to sanctuary state policies. and benefiting palestinians in need, largely funded by the us. millions of your dollars