that's it for us tonight. tune in every night at 8:00 to the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. it's an abundance right now. good night from washington. sean hannity, secure in new york city, awaits your viewing! >> sean: tucker, lying, prosody, smugness, groupthink. goty it. good show. welcome to "hannity." this is yet another insane breaking news night, buckle up. it is now tonight day 365 of the mueller witch hunt.t. president trump and his legal team, they are fighting back in a huge way against this corrupt special counsel investigation. we have a massive development from the president's attorney, rudy giuliani, telling "the washington times" that mueller isil now agreeing to narrow the scope of those questions that he wants to ask theag president, the former new york city mayor will join us right here on this program, but the great one, mark levin, he was correct from the get-go. the constitution of this country

is on president trump's side. he'll explain. president trump is now reacting to "the new york times," inadvertently confirming our year-long reporting that in fact the obama fbi, well, and one part, spied on his campaign, now he's calling the scandal bigger than watergate and the president's right, as we have been telling you. we also have an explosive report tonight, knew details from sara carter reporting the doj, ig report on the corrupt handling of theru client an email investigation is "extremely long and thorough." it could in fact lead to the recommendation ofd criminal charges. there's a big catch. some of the deep state actors in the doj, they'll be able to review, possibly redact, or ultimately released to you, the american people. we'll explain why they might not get away with that. also major developments in the nuclear showdown with kim jong un and north korea, we'll tell you what president trump is saying about the upcoming meeting with kim jong un.

all of that, buckle up, glad you are with us, tonight's breaking news opening monologue. ♪ huge developments. president trump's attorney rudy giuliani will be joining us interest a few minutes. he is telling "the washington times" of a special counsel robert mueller is agreeing now, finally, rightly, to limit the scope of potential questions he wants to ask the president. the former new york city mayor is also saying that this could result in a possible july interview. mueller issuing a final report by labor day. of course before the midterm elections. if true, that would be a wooden rack for the president. the original questions were completely ridiculous, and insane. obviously a perjury trap. "what were you thinking"? it doesn't matter what he was thinking. the one-year anniversary of the mueller witch hunt, and so far the special counsel has not provided a single shred of evidence of any collusion and collusion is not against the law. special counsel has been so abusive, so corrupt, they are so

conflicted that the president and his legal team, they are now rightly going on offense to combat the illicit deep state scheme. the president tweeting earlier today... it's been a year and so far, all mueller is doing is trying to get paul manafort to flip. bringing up completely unrelated tax charges, dealing with ukraine from 200,522,007. it has nothing to do whatsoever with the trump campaign. if that's not embarrassing enough, look at the mueller's embarrassing case against the 13 so-called russian bot companies. that is falling apart. how is it possible, with all of these great attorneys like andrew weissmann, that he indicted a company that didn't

exist at the time? h great job, guys. also james comey telling congress he didn't think michael flynn lied to the fbi. whited toti mueller charge genel plan anyway? there is something very off about what is happening with general plan. this is a monumental abuse of power. it is unlike anything this country has everf seen, and the media has been m.i.a. it's costing you, the american taxpayers, president trump is paying the cost, operates in about $10 million. because of all of these facts, president trump's legal team ise no longer sitting back and watching mueller and his deep state operatives and this whole disaster unfold. yesterday, we did learn that the special counsel is no longer considering indicting the president.t. okay. we've been telling you this over and over and over, it's impossible for constitutional reasons, as we have explained. although this is impossible, there is no constitutional precedent to ever even consider this. there are long-established doj

guidelines that we have explained already in place. former new york city mayor, the president's lawyer, rudyk giuliani, also pointing out that mueller might not even be able to issue a subpoena because the president's legal team has already handed over over 1 million documents. inea other words, mueller alreay has everything that they have requested. the only point of a presidential interview is to set a perjury trap. this witch hunt is now a direct threat to those american republic.n mueller is causing irreparable damage to the rule of law in this country. also tonight, "the new york times" confirming our reporting that we've had over a year, and part of it is just recent, the obama fbi did inin fact have a mall inside the trump campaign. watergate, the break-in was a big deal? "the new york times" did not do this on purpose. they suddenly decided that they wanted to tell the truth for once? this was not a simple accident,

as evidenced by "the new york times" purposely, as andy mccarthy said, burying the lede of the story, while trying to spin and cover up for those people that they wouldn't cover for an entire year, those that are involved in all of this illicit activity. what's happening now is that of a deep state, they know they are about to be exposed, like we are expecting the ig report, after the ig report, we will get the 1.2 million documents that the ig looked at, that will follow, and i believe what is happening is very obvious and transparent. they are leaking information to try to get out in front of this scandal that we have been exposing on this program.n in other words, the information they have ignored as they talk about russia, russia, stormy, stormy. the doj is trying to protect themselves, leaking this information to friendly media. oh, "the new york times" is nobody friendlier. "the wall street journal"'s kimberley strassel pointed out, she broke the story last friday, pointing out these leakers are trying to literally get a head

of devin nunes of the house intel committee, and congress, o they can make all of us sound, it's not that bad, we knew about this. congress hasn't been able to see this information. why? the deputy attorney general totally conflicted for numerous reasons, rod rosenstein refusing to fork over what is rightfully congress' role in oversight. he won't hand over, they are obstructing. here's what we mean from his "new york times" report. "the fbi. phone records and other documents using national security letters, obtained by subpoena, and at least one government informant met several times with carter page, papadopoulos, current and former officials said." so we have a secret type of subpoena, the obama fbi used to spy on the trump campaign. that is on top of the fbi, they doj, longing to a fisa judge in an original application and three subsequent applications about the clinton bought and

paid for dossier put together by a foreign national using russian lies to getdo a warrant to also spy anna trump campaign. are you keeping up with me? this is the united states of america. in otherer words, you have all f thesea. top people, they doj, ad the fbi, not rank and file, the top people, making sure he had every base of their is covered because their goal was to get trumped by any means necessary after they helped hillary rig an investigation. exoneration before investigatio investigation. former new york city mayor, rudy giuliani, saying this information could in fact blow up the entire mueller investigation.p he's right. watch this. >> in this case i think we have to look into whether we can challenge the legitimacy of the entire investigation. maybe it's special prosecutor, special counsel never should have been appointed, not based on an illegal leak, not based on a set of facts that go back to -- i am shocked to hear that

they put a spy inn the campaign of a major party candidates. it may be two spies. now i'm going through my brain, as you know, i was a big part of that campaign, trying to figure out who was the spy. now i'm wondering, this person, that person? if there is a spy, they got nothing from it. they would be able to bring their case right now if the spy had any incriminating information. >> sean: the mayor will turn it's in a second. here's another consequential piece of information from that "new york times" article that we know was leaked, days after they closed their investigation into hillary clinton's illegal use of a private email server, agents then, the same people, the ones that helped exonerate hillary before investigating her, and rigging the investigation, then they began to scrutinize the campaign of her republican rival. that would be donald trump. just like we have been saying, the small group of deep state actors, they put the fixed income of the exonerated hillary clinton, we know she committed felonies, the evidence is overwhelming,

incontrovertible, would have put everyone of you in jail. then days later, the same people, they went after donald trump. they all thought they knew better than the american people. that means you. if all of that isn't enough, well, this part is shocking, could have serious criminal implications. "top australian officials broke with diplomatic protocol allowing the ambassador, alexander downer, to sit for an fbi interview to describe his meeting with campaign advisor george f papadopoulos. those quoted in order for that of a medic protocol be broken, that means that john kerry, anda state department, from the get-go, had to be involved, they had to know from day one, and that means the obama white house had to sign offba on it from day one. no one else in the media is reporting this. so clearly, this goes way beyond comey and top level fbi doj state agitators.

so the big question for barack obama and john kerry, they need to explain under oath what did they know and when did they know it. we raise that question in the past.w now we have a real reason to ask. there isit no way that would hae happened without their approval. as for the doj, the ig report that we just mentioned that's coming out, sara carter also with us tonight, breaking huge news. a draft of this highly this highly anticipated report on the fbi and the doj's handling of the printed email investigation, exoneration before investigation, has been sent to congress, finally, 14, 15 months.4 she says in reports tonight, it is extremely long and extremely thorough. sara is also reporting that this draft does not contain referrals but of course, that would come after, like in the case of andrew mccabe. this is a big development. by the way, it does come with gotsmall catch that we've to pay very close attention to. fox news reporting that the fbi and doj, we now know they have it. they are now being allowed to view the ig's draft.

that means they will maybe offer instances where they want to redactct information. that means that the deep state would be able to at least attempt to try and hide the truth. this is rod rosenstein and the doj's ammo. what do they do? a slow walk, stonewall, and when that doesn't work, they redact under the false guise of national security, so disgraceful. but we know that everything they redact so far has nothing to do with national security, has to do with embarrassing details, like, oh, james comey and the fbi didn't think general flynn lied. we've been saying this for a while, for the longest time, this is why we need a second special counsel that is completely independent fromt the fbi and the doj. when push comes to shove, at the end of the day, they are not capable of holding themselves accountable. the inspector general needs to hold firm on his report tonight. also tonight, robert mueller,

the scope of memo of his investigation, andrew weissmann leading the team, mueller spitball, got excoriated by the judge two fridays ago, and went after mueller's team. why? they are going after paul manafort. on march? 2005, already investigated tax fraud issue, had nothing to do with the election, with the campaign, or even russia itself or the russia investigation. the same judge blasting the manafort, trying to get manafort to flip. judge ellis says, they want to put the screws to him. and make him sing so they can either prosecute or impeach president trump. also following tonight, one of the most egregious examples of media bias. that is destroy-trump-media, the press claiming that president trump called illegal immigrants "animals." okay. it's not the case. he was talking specifically about members of the deadly

ms-13 gangs. look at these headlines from so-called news organizations. they knowingly, purposely took the president out of context to try and smear him yet again. it shows why i have said over and over, news media, journalism in america is dead. then there's this utterly shameful media coverage -- i can't believe this poses as news in the united states, but supposedly it does. take a look. because the president of the united states has to measure his and be more comfortable at what he said. it's a very slippery slope when you start to dehumanizing people. it is what the nazis did, it is what slave owners did for you. >> the president is dominating the headlines after referring to immigrants as animals. >> these aren't people, these are animals.. that was doing a white house meeting on sanctuary cities, the comments came after someone remarked about ms-13 gang members. the president did not make it clear about whether he was talking about gang members or immigrants in general.

i gotta say, immigrants can hear this as a dog whistle and they y this is downright dangerous language. >> sean: let's go to the videotape what did the president actually say clark's to? he was talking about this vicious gain, known as ms-13. take a look. >> and ms-13 gang member, i know about, if they don't reach a certain threshold, i cannot tell i.c.e. about. >> weel have people coming into the country, trying to command, we are stopping a lot of them, and we are taking people out of the country, you wouldn't believe up bad to these people are. these are two people. theseop are animals and we are taking them out of the country at a level and rate that hasn't happened before.th because of the week laws, they come in fast, we get them, we release them, we get them again, to bring them out it's crazy. >> sean: today the president responded to this abusively biasedndnt news media take a lod

>> you know i am referring to the ms-13 gangs that are coming in. i was talking about the ms-13 and also, if you look a little t bit further on, you'll see that. i'm surprised you are asking this question because most people got it right. i'm seeing the ms-13 -- you don't have that where you come from, these are animals, they are coming into our country, we are getting them out, they come in again, we are getting them out, so when the ms-13 comes in, the other gang members come into the country, i referred to them as animals, and guess what, i always will. >> sean: media bias is not the only thing the president is weighing in on today. he was also asked about north korea's threat to pull out of the nuclear summit, here's what he had to say about that. >> nothing has changed with north korea as we know, we have not been told anything, if it does, it's fine, if it doesn't come i think we will have a very successful meeting. we have not been told anything. just reading stories like you are. we've heard certain things from

south korea, which will see what happens. we are continuing to negotiate in terms of location. the location as to where to meet, how to make him our rooms, everything else. they've been negotiating like nothing happened. if you read the newspapers, maybe it won't happen. i can't tell you yet. i will tell you very shortly.e' we'll know very soon. >> sean: the president is not my thing is now. joining us with reaction, fox news contributor, former u.s. attorney, "national review" contributing editor, he has been amazing in his writingng on topf his game, andrew mccarthy, and the author of the upcoming book, i love the title, "the russian hoax," fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. andy, i am on radio, calling it cross fire hurricane each edition of the sean hannity radio show. i'll be playing that music in the minutes. you wrote to the same thing today. i want you to go into what the e

times" was doing yesterday, why they tried to get ahead of this. >> i think, sean, what they are burying, the birds that you almost never see in the whole article is counterintelligence. and the reason is, the scandal here is they had a case in which they didn't have a criminal predicate, and they didn't even reallydi have the predicate you would need to invoke national security powers to conduct this kind of an investigation, and they used their counterintelligence powers to conduct not only an investigation on american citizens, but it was the incumbent democratic administration employing these extraordinary tactics that are meant to protect america against foreign enemies, and they employed them against their political adversaries in the trump campaign. that is a story. >> sean: as you said, rightly so, they buried the lede. i did give you attribution, by the way, a goodd line. let me go to sara.

this is interesting. you know have gotten at leastyo some feedback on what we can expect for michael horowitz's report. i want to add to that, now we know that the actors that were investigated, will weigh in on it. does that mean they can use phony rejections? does that mean they can add or trynd to get the inspector genel to change what he wrote? >> they can certainly respond. this is current officials and formerer officials, from the fbi and doj, and what they are going to do is take a look at this report, remember, nobody has seen this. the t people the inspector genel has given us to come by the fbi and doj, current and former officials, people within congress, which i have been told how to sign nondisclosure agreements so they wouldn't release any of the information. before the people in the report had a time to respond. what will happen is, they all respond to that, but will be attached to the report, and whether or not there is reductions, conversations before that report is released, that

will happen. we don't know yet what will be -- one of the things, sean, i think they will be looking at, as well, as the scope of the hillary clinton investigation. this is a full scope of the bureau'ss investigation. like you said, millions of documents over a year of investigation into this. it will take about three to four weeks before it will be made public. >> sean: and then the 1.2 million documents should follow. we should have access to those. i thought buried in the "the times" report was an interesting point, gregg jarret gregg jarrett. if they got permission to interview the australianrr diplomat, that had to go through the state department, no? wouldn't that have been known from the very beginning by the john kerry state department and probably the president himself? >> the answer is likely yes but we don't know because they have

been so secretive about everything, the fbi, department of justice has been covering up everything. the use of this confidential informant by comey and his minions at the b fbi, it should embrace any any doubt that americans have that this is an agency of the government that has used its power in an attempt to frame donald trump and destroy him. they were trying to entrap people in the trump campaign to say something incriminating, and of course they were never charged withg collusion, so they said nothing of the sort. >> sean: collusion is not a crime. that's the irony here. andy, i know you've been doing great writing. am i wrong? hillary clinton committed crimes, they exonerated before investigating, then it's the phony dossier, then a spy in the campaign, then the fisa courts being lied to for an entire year with unverified,ur uncorroborat,

and they never, by omission, they lied by not saying that hillary paid for it. is n anything wrong in the statements, sir? >> i don't think so. this is such an expansive, complicated story that you always need a hook that people can wrap their brain around to understand it and the only hoax that i keep coming back to is that there is no objective person of good faith left or right, whatever your ideology, party, who could look at these two investigations, and say that equal justice was done. it is simply not possible. what happened here is they bent over backwards to not make the case against mrs. clinton and then they scorched the earth to invent a case against donald trump. >> sean: that's the name of gregg's book, and in a nutshell. andy, great work. welcomee aboard, by the way. we look forward to you being our colleague. we appreciate you being with us. when we come back,

president trump's attorney rudy giuliani is next. you don't want to miss the great one, mark 11, he was right about the constitution favoring the president. ♪ ["cross fire hurricane" playing] as a control enthusiast, i'm all-business when i travel... even when i travel... for leisure. so i go national, where i can choose any available upgrade in the aisle - without starting any conversations- -or paying any upcharges.

what can i say? control suits me. go national. go like a pro.

they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again

go to stamps.com/tv oh hi sweetie, i just want to show you something. xfinity mobile: find my phone.

[ phone rings ] look at you. this tech stuff is easy. [ whirring sound ] you want a cookie? it's a drone! i know. find your phone easily with the xfinity voice remote. one more way comcast is working to fit into your life, not the other way around. >> sean: the hurricane >> sean: this cross fire hurricane e edition of "hannity." welcome back. joining us now is the former new york city mayor, president trump's attorney, rudy giuliani. you spoke today, i watch the interview with laura, a great interview, i want to narrow the focus today. you spoke with the manafort, talking about narrowing the questions, and my question is, why would the president ever talk to somebody that is using the tactic that he's using and higher andrew weissmann? >> you know the president as

well as i do in the president has a great desire to come forward and tell the truth, if he gets a t fair hearing. our job is to make sure he gets a fair hearing, jane and marty and me, our job is to make sure he gets a fair hearing from mueller. now we are not convinced he will. but we had the first hopeful communication with him last night, as a result of our saying that we put in five letters to them, never got a response, we finally did. i don't want to do dismiss it because i think it was a good faith attempt to really narrow the focus quite dramatically in questions. >> sean: why would i give the president -- you've handed over everything, you've been transparent, why notr just answr the questions written? let the president take his time and not have a perjury trap. >> that could still be 1,001 if there were written answers and it would probably be under oath.

of course they could be more carefully done, and you could avoid some of the traps. if we thought there was any kind of drab, he's not doing it. there is a whole argument that there is a trap here. frankly, they could write their report right now today. they have all the facts, 1.4 million documents, 28 witnesses, several interviewed more than once, and every explanation that they need is already given by president trump and interviews. how about the lester holt interview he explains precisely why he fired comey for a noncorrupt reason? by the way, he didn't have to have a reason for firing comey and everything we learned since then, my goodness, he should've fired him earlier. >> sean: mr. mayor, this is where rosenstein is conflicted, that and the fact that he signed off on one of the subsequent fisa renewals. let me ask you this. look at judge alice two fridays

ago, they are using a 2005 case of paul manafort, this was supposed to be about the t trump-russia collusion, to put the screws to manafort so that he will sing so they can either prosecute or impeach the president of the united states.e i'm sorry, i have serious ethical issues with the entire process involved in this. >> let's go to "the new york times" today, which really gave most everything we need to know about how illegitimate this investigation was from day one. i mean, this goes back 100 days before the election. they had spies in the trump camp. i'm trying to figure out who it was, sitting next to me on the airplane. here's the thing the spies found out. there was no collusion with the russians. i repeat, there was no collusion with the russians. >> sean: collusion is not a crime, mr. mayor. >> if you collude for criminal purposes, then it's conspiracy.

no such thing happened. no such thing happened, sean. the president has been saying, this is a witch hunt, today's headline in a "the times" should have been "comey witch hunt." >> sean: okay. well said. but if i wanted to get information, if i was working for your campaign, you are running for president, i wanted to get information and somebody told me, i've got information on your opponent, your opponent is hillary clinton, doesn't matter who it is? if i sit down and say that? >> no. responsible. how would you even know where the person got it? they want to tell you. they will tell you, this is what we got and you will accepted or rejected. in the case of this campaign, the one time that happened without russian woman, it turned out she didn't have any information down she was trying to negotiate sanctions, and they basically threw her out. >> sean:on they wanted to talk about russian adoption. let me ask you this. you said last night, hillary did

commit felonies. you don't delete emails and acid wash a hard drive and that's not obstruction. do you believe, as i believe, that when they wrote the exoneration before the investigation that it was rigged? do you believe that when they used the dossier to get a fisa warns that it was illegal, and they did at four times, rod rosenstein also signed off on it, never verified, corroborated, never told the judge is hillary paid for it, and the other part of it, now we know there was a spy in the trump campaign. mr. mayor, sir, this is the united states. >> you did it right, that's watergate compounded by the fact that we are many years after watergate, we didn't think it could happen. this is a far worse crime, and intrusion on democracy, then a non-russian conspiracy. who's investigating it? i hope that this is turned over criminal referral. i hope for once the justice

department wakes up and investigates something other than, you know, and powering mueller to an illegitimate investigation. it is illegitimate. >> sean: mr. mayor, long before you saved new york city, did an amazing job, i was here, i watched it, i can describe it in detail, i don't have time tonight. you are also a prosecutor. i'm asking this question about prosecutors. they have a responsibility to handle subpoenaed documents. they are slow walking, they are claiming they could redact in the name of national security, and there's no need for it, but they are not cooperating and they are obstructing. what should be the next step? should the president follow jim jordan and ron desantis and mark meadows a advice and handed over? >> i have no problem with that. they have no reason not to handed over to congress. l just like they are intruding on articles or go with witch hunt

investigation, they are intruding now into article one, the congressional power to have oversight. they have no right to be at war unto themselves. that is what they are doing. >> sean: mr. mayor, we always appreciate it. this iss our cross fire hurricae edition of "hannity." when we come back, mark levin has been right from the get-go, the constitution of the united states is on the president's side.e. to the great one, mark levin, next. ♪ melatonin is the body's own sleep ingredient. only remfresh uses ion-powered melatonin to deliver up to 7 hours of sleep support. number one sleep doctor recommended remfresh-your nightly sleep companion. available in the natural sleep section at walmart.

>> it's been the position of united states department of justice under republicans and democrats, in a 1973 memorandum in october memorandum under the clinton administration that you must not, cannot indict a sitting president, not that this president would become of that is not my point. as a matter of constitutional interpretation, for 44 years, that has been in it, law

professors, homeless people, all over tv and radio talking about obstruction of justice. we fed media types talking about it. members of congress talking about it. it doesn't matter. the official position of the justice department is we don't charge a sitting president with a crime. >> sean: all right, the great one mark levin on our program, june 20th, 2017. he worked as a chief of staff, the attorney general, disclaiming explaining department of justice policy. mark broke it right here. he joins us now. host of crt b's "life, liberty, and levin," the number one show on sunday nights, the great one, mark levin, how are you from my friend? i'm getting really ticked off because you are right, you have all of these people, they say, vagueness, they can't indict a sitting president, no kidding. you've been saying it for over a year. we pointed out repeatedly.

the media has gotten every aspect of this wrong. they'vef ignored the real crime, the real abuse of power and corruption scandal in this country and they've been on a witch hunt that is now going on over a year. toto me, this has to come to an end and some truth needs to come out, sir. >> this been an investigation oddly enough, sean, has disclosed, has revealed, that the greatest perpetrator of cash against the american people was the federal government. the greatest perpetrator of the american people was the federal government, fbi, cia, national intelligence director. >> sean:te not rank-and-file. >> of course not. i want to take this to the next level. the president of the united states will not be indictedl. and if he is, he will take it to the supreme court and to heal win. all that is that now, we cannot allow this to happen again. we saw our federal government being used by the prior administration, head of the cia,

head of the fbi, head of national intelligence, and many, many others, used it to try and destroy the candidacy of an opposition candidate and another party, donald trump on the republican party. that is the president's administration, the existing administration interfering in the elections. we've never seen anything like this before in american history. so here's what we need to do. we now know that the obama administration spied -- if the obama administration, he is the president, the buck stops at his desk. he may be playing around with his library in chicago and going off and writing a phony book and everything, he needs to be held responsible and his surrogates should be held responsible. the fisa court failed us. the fisa court failed us. we have these national security letters that are supposed to be used in extreme circumstances being used. a cabal of fbi agents who took it upon themselves to investigate a candidate and his campaign, and then we have of

course actual spies, one or more, and the trump campaign. what is this? this on the stomach soviet union, venezuela? at the united states of america. let me say this. once mr. mueller turns over his report to mr. rosenstein, the president should do two things. he should pick his favorite united states attorney, not favored because they are cows, most confident they can, give them an assignment. i don't care what jeff sessions does. he is the president. tell him, i want you to t investigate the activities that took place in this election, let the chips fall where they may come of the interference of a selection by the fbi, the cia, national intelligence, i want to know what genre and ended, i want to know it collaborated, i want to know what comey did, not because i'm going to punish them, you'll make determinations about them.m. >> sean: susan rice. >> something is terribly wrong. >> i would also tell him, i've said this before, we need to fix this.

we cannot have another election where the federal government, our united states government, is interfering with an election! gives her what i think the president needs to do is appoint a commission of five or seven people, i told you this on your show a long time ago, top-notch men from prior administrations, and women, and appoint them and say, fix the fbi at the top, fix the cia, fix the intelligenceie agencies, we cannot allow this to happen to another president of the united states. sorry jeff sessions, all these other people, the president should take the responsibility -- >> sean: don't apologize. >> you are talking about spies in the trump administration? that failed the fisa court? this is incredible stuff. >> sean: mark, you talk about the spies, it wasn't just one fisa court judge that was given phony information that was never verified, never corroborated, never were they told that

hillary bought and paid for ths information with a foreign agent.d where is congress? why won't congress bring these fisa judges before them and demanded to know how they feel about being lied to? >> i will tell you why. because unlike the democrats, the republicans are scared, like rats. they scatter. you have certainin republicans o go with the democrats because they want to destroy this president. they can't get over the fact that he got elected and they can't get over the fact the american people didn't follow them. people don't evenel know who thy are. i want to emphasize something here so your guests in the future can repeat what i'm going to say, which isom this. we need anit accounting of what mr. john brennan did and what mr. clapper did, and what mr. comey stated, an accounting of what susan rice did, what to cement stood, we haven't even gotten to the unmasking stuff yet. not because we want to get even, because we need an accounting, people need to be held to

account.et number one, number to call, we need to fix these departments of agencies. >> sean: mark, if we don't fix them, we lose our country. not a joke. you once wrote, a post-constitutional america, it is getting scary now. great one, "life, liberty, and levin," don't miss it, sunday night, ten eastern on fox. when we come back, dr. sebastian gorka, dan bongino, the media is shameful, horrific, dishonest act today on the president. we'll show you straightk ahead. we had long deployments in iraq. i'm really grateful that usaa was able to take care of my family while i was overseas serving. it was my very first car accident. we were hit from behind. i called usaa and the first thing they asked was 'are you ok?' they always thank you for your service, which is nice because as a spouse you serve too. we're the hayles and we're usaa members for life.

see how much you could save with usaa by bundling your auto and home insurance. get a quote today.

not the conservative guy, travis allen. what about this john cox? talks a big game... but what's he done? a chicago lawyer? huh? thirteen losing campaigns -

seven in illinois? cox lost campaigns as a republican... and as a democrat. gave money to liberals. supported big tax increases. no wonder republicans say cox is unelectable in november.

>> this is one of the >> this is one of the most vicious and deadly gangs that operate by the motto of control

and kill. the media and liberals want to destroy ms-13, frankly, i don't think the term the president used. ms-13 used heinous act. it took an animal to stab a man 100 times and decapitate him and ripped his heart out. it took a to an animal to beat a woman 28 times, and ending part of her time. it took an animal to kidnap, drugs, and rape a 14-year-old houston girl. frankly, i don't think the term animal goes far enough. >> sean: van. sarah sanders beat down about the medias reaction to president trump's contact dominant comments when he was talking about ms-13 gang members as animals. here with us, dr. sebastian gorka. nra tv contributor, former secret service agent dan bongino. this was a lie from the get-go. this is what the media does every single day, they seem to get away with it, dr. gorka.

>> yeah, i think it's the beautiful irony that the left-wing media invented the phrase "the fake news" on the president has turned it around like jiu-jitsu and he's using it against them every day, and they never learn their listen. this tells you everything you need to know, the fake news from the dnc wants to protect criminals. the president wants to protect americans from criminals. ms-13, they are not just animals, sean. they are subhuman. they dehumanize their adversaries, and they wish to perpetrate crimes on u.s. soil. this president to stop that. i leveled he said today. it was absolutely epic when he said, i call them animals and i am always going to call them animals. that is who donald trump is. >> sean: dan, the same reaction as dr. gorka. i mean, really?

sarah going through it, that is only the short list. we can give you the big list. sean, the media dictionary is kind of interesting. americansan are referred to as deplorables, illegal immigrants as dreamers, nra members as terrorists, and yet ms-13 gets called animals by president trump and visa suckers in the media get bated into defending ms-13. how do you think that sounds to the average american living in a middle-class community, may have some crime problems, how do you think that sounds when these clouds in the media with the bow ties and the coastal bubble go out there and defend ms-13 in these communities. they sound like the clouds they are paid a total joke. >> sean: the thing is, this is serious in these communities. you know what, innocent people are dying because of these gangs,s, dr. gorka. >> we have, this is one example i used to get when i was training fbi agents in mexico

south of the border on a saturday night, at the local drug cartels, in the middle of the discotheque, rolled severed heads onto the dance floor. these are the people that nancy pelosi today described as having a spark of divinity as human beings with dignity. they decapitate their fellow man and roll their heads onto a danceeei floor. god bless nancy pelosi because in november,ls the president wil be writing his own red wave back into the white house. >> sean: is this election, dan bongino, at the end of the day going to come back to this? the c great success on the economy, nancy pelosi wants to raise taxes, and they want to impeach as president. i think this is going to be one of the most important midterm elections in our lifetime, if not our history, based on what the democrats want to do. >> yeah, sean, they don't have much of an agenda based on we are not donald trump, but at the

end of the day, people vote for kitchen table issues. when their wallets get fatter and their jobs and promotions start coming down that pipeline, that is going to have a deep impact on how they voted. i think -- there may be a blue wave, i can't deny that there is some anti-tribal animosity, but i certainly think it. is not going to bel to the degree the media is hyping it. >> sean: good to see you both. when we come back, fake new cnn, there anti-trump so-called journalist ada agitator jim acosta, made probably the most ridiculous comment about his coverage of the president. do you want to see this next. ♪ for leisure. so i go national, where i can choose any available upgrade in the aisle - without starting any conversations- -or paying any upcharges. what can i say?

control suits me. go national. go like a pro. (group conversation) ♪wooooo oo waa ahhh ♪it's a beautiful mornin' thank you ♪ahhh, ah ahhh ♪each bird

go >> ♪ >> ♪ >> sean: cnn fake news cry baby jim acosta, a big liberal that anything for attention. he went on jimmy kimmel live last night. >> are you their least favorite

of all? >> probably but it's as fdr once said i welcome their hatred. and when i covered president obama i was just as tough on him. >> sean: take a look at this hard hitting question from 2015. >> i want to ask you about what people are calling you about your best week ever. you had two supreme court decisions in support of the affordable care act and of gay rights and you delivered a speech in charlton that was warmly received. it seems you have built up remaining capital. how do you want to use it? what hard things do you want to tackle at this point? >> sean: only thing missing are the pom-poms. that's all the time we have left

this evening. set your dvr, we are always fair and balanced. let not your heart be troubled. that was a great interview with rudy last night. i'm glad you asked all those questions. i had the new news with rudy. >> laura: that acosta, they were practically swooning in that question. how great are you, president oba obama? i think you're great. but your legacy. oh, my god, erecting a statue to him. >> sean: why not just admit he is a leftist who hates donald trump. let stop the pretense. >> laura: move on dot org is looking for a copy righter. "the new york times"